Wavefront-guided Laser In Situ Keratomileusis Research Articles

Clinical outcomes and higher order aberrations of wavefront-guided LASIK versus SMILE for correction of myopia: A systemic review and meta-analysis.

To systematically evaluate the clinical effect of wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis (WFG-LASIK) and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in terms of refractive errors and high-order aberrations. A systematic literature search of PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science and China National Knowledge Internet was performed to identify studies evaluating the clinical outcomes of SMILE and WFG-LASIK ended in May 2022. Meta-analyses were performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. The risk of bias of the RCTs was evaluated using the Cochrane Handbook criteria, and the quality of the non-randomised controlled studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. In total, 1385 eyes (SMILE group, 750 eyes; WFG-LASIK group, 635 eyes) from 12 studies were included. The meta-analysis demonstrated that spherical aberration was smaller in the SMILE group than in the WFG-LASIK group (standardised mean difference [SMD]: -0.34, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.47, -0.22; p< 0.00001), and that the postoperative values of vertical coma (SMD: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.63, 1.03; p< 0.00001) and trefoil (SMD: 0.37; 95% CI: 0.02, 0.72; p=0.04) were higher in the SMILE group compared to the WFG LASIK group. There were no significant differences in the clinical outcomes and the values of induced total higher order aberrations between the WFG-LASIK and SMILE groups (SMD: 0.05; 95% CI: -0.09, 0.19; p=0.47). Both SMILE and WFG-LASIK were found to be safe, effective, and predictable. SMILE may induce more vertical coma and trefoil, whereas WFG LASIK may induce more spherical aberrations, but no significant differences were found in the total higher order aberrations between SMILE and WFG-LASIK.

Corneal Sensitivity and Patient-Reported Dry Eye Symptoms in a Prospective Randomized Contralateral-Eye Trial Comparing Laser In Situ Keratomileusis and Small Incision Lenticule Extraction

To prospectively compare corneal sensation and patient-reported symptoms of dry eye in individuals undergoing laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). Prospective randomized contralateral-eye clinical trial. 80 eyes of 40 patients with myopia at Byers Eye Institute at Stanford University were randomized to receive wavefront-guided femtosecond LASIK in one eye and SMILE in the fellow eye. Cochet-Bonnet esthesiometry was performed to assess corneal sensitivity preoperatively and at the 1-, 3-, 6-, and 12-month postoperative visits. Participants also completed questionnaires at each visit to determine the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI). Eyes that underwent LASIK compared to SMILE demonstrated more corneal denervation at the postoperative 1-month (mean 2.1 vs 3.6 cm, P < .001), 3-month (3.5 vs 5.4 cm, P < .001), and 6-month (4.7 vs 5.7 cm, P < .001) visits. At the 12-month visit, both groups had returned to baseline corneal sensitivity (5.9 vs 5.9 cm, P=.908). There was no difference in OSDI between the 2 groups at any visit. Mean OSDI improved from the preoperative to the postoperative 12-month visit in both LASIK (15.3 to 8.6, P=.020) and SMILE (15.1 to 9.5, P=.029) groups. LASIK resulted in greater corneal denervation compared to SMILE in the early postoperative period, though this difference was no longer apparent after 12 months. Despite this, there was no difference in self-reported dry eye symptoms between the 2 groups. Patient-reported dry eye symptoms improved after both LASIK and SMILE procedures.

Functional optical zone after wavefront-optimized versus wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis.

Many studies have used functional optical zone (FOZ) as a measure to compare different refractive laser treatment modalities. However, to our knowledge, no study has compared wavefront- optimized (WFO) and wavefront-guided (WFG) laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) using FOZ. We compared the FOZ after WFO versus WFG LASIK in patients with myopia and myopic astigmatism. In this prospective comparative study, we included 100 myopic eyes of 50 patients with or without astigmatism. They were divided into two groups according to the platform used: WFO or WFG femtosecond LASIK. Using Holladay's equivalent keratometry reading (EKR) report of Pentacam HR, FOZ was defined as a zone centered on the pupil center with a standard deviation (SD) of 0.5 D, around the mean EKR. The differences in FOZ between the two platforms were analyzed at 3 months postoperatively. Visual acuity, refractive error, corneal asphericity (Q-value), and root mean square of higher-order aberrations (RMS for HOAs) were evaluated and compared. The mean (SD) of patient age was 26.64 (5.67) years. The preoperative characteristics of the two groups were comparable (all P > 0.05). The intended optical zone (IOZ) was 6 mm in both groups. The mean laser ablation depth was significantly greater in the WFG group (18 µm per D) than in the WFO group (16 µm per D) (P = 0.035). At 3 months postoperatively, the mean (SD) of FOZ diameter was 4.32 (0.94) mm (71.99% [15.68%] of intended optical zone) in the WFO group and 4.16 (1.13) mm (69.33% [18.78%] of intended optical zone) in the WFG group, with no significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.622). The change in corneal asphericity was greater in the WFG group than in the WFO group (P = 0.034). Postoperative mean corrected and uncorrected distance visual acuity, manifest refraction, and RMS for HOAs showed no significant difference between the two groups (all P > 0.05). We found that WFG LASIK resulted in greater ablation depth and change in corneal asphericity than WFO LASIK at 3 months postoperatively. However, there was no significant difference in FOZ diameter, refractive error, and RMS for HOAs between the two groups. Further research is needed to confirm these findings.

Prospective, Randomized Contralateral Eye Comparison of Wavefront-Guided Laser In Situ Keratomileusis and Small Incision Lenticule Extraction Refractive Surgeries

Wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis (WFG-LASIK) and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) are keratorefractive surgeries that can improve uncorrected visual acuity in myopic patients. Comparison of visual outcomes in myopic patients treated with LASIK and SMILE is needed. Prospective, randomized contralateral eye-controlled trial. We performed a single-center prospective, randomized contralateral eye comparison of WFG-LASIK and SMILE (NCT03067077). Myopic patients with low levels of astigmatism were treated with WFG-LASIK in one eye and SMILE in the fellow eye from March 2017 to March 2021. Treatments were randomized by ocular dominance. WFG-LASIK and SMILE were performed. Postoperative evaluation at 1 day consisted of uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), wavefront aberrometry, and a slit-lamp examination. On subsequent postoperative visits at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months, UDVA, manifest refraction, 5% and 25% low-contrast visual acuity, wavefront aberrometry, and slit-lamp examination were performed. The primary outcome measure was UDVA at 12 months. Eighty-eight eyes of 44 patients with myopia were enrolled in the study. Seventy-four eyes of 37 patients had successful treatments and completed 12 months of follow-up. At postoperative month 12, there were a significantly higher proportion of WFG-LASIK eyes that had ≥20/20 UDVA compared with SMILE eyes (94% vs 83%, P < .05). There was no difference between spherical equivalent between WFG-LASIK eyes and SMILE eyes (-0.17 ± 0.25 vs -0.29 ± 0.38, P > .05); there was no difference in higher order aberrations, including coma, trefoil, and spherical aberrations (P > 0.05); and there were a significantly higher proportion of WFG-LASIK eyes that had improved 5% and 25% low-contrast visual acuity compared with SMILE eyes (P < 0.05). WFG-LASIK and SMILE both offered marked improvements in corrected distance visual acuity and excellent predictability in both eyes. Compared with SMILE, WFG-LASIK resulted in faster visual recovery, better low-contrast visual acuity, and greater gains in uncorrected visual acuity.

Higher-order aberrations following wavefront-guided photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis

Background: We aimed to evaluate higher-order aberrations (HOAs) following wavefront-guided photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) and laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in patients with myopia and myopic astigmatism.&#x0D; Methods: This retrospective observational case-control study included patients who underwent wavefront-guided PRK (40 eyes of 20 patients) or LASIK (40 eyes of 20 patients) between August 2018 and November 2018 at the refractive surgery unit of Kayseri City Hospital Eye Clinic, Turkey. The corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), manifest refraction, corneal topography, and HOAs were evaluated preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively in all patients.&#x0D; Results: The mean age ± standard deviation (SD) was 27.13 ± 5.54 years and 29.10 ± 4.38 years in the PRK and LASIK groups, respectively (P = 0.06). Both groups had a mean CDVA of 1.00. The mean ± SD of spherical and spherical equivalent values was -2.09 ± 1.56 diopter (D) and -3.03 ± 1.72 D in the PRK group and -2.23 ± 1.69 D and -3.35 ± 1.71 D in the LASIK group, respectively (P = 0.58). When the preoperative and postoperative HOAs and root mean square (RMS) values (for a 6-mm pupil diameter) were compared in the PRK group, a significant difference was found in vertical coma and total RMS values (P = 0.003 and P ˂ 0.001, respectively); in the LASIK group, there was a significant difference in preoperative and postoperative vertical coma and total RMS values (P = 0.0.001 and P ˂ 0.001, respectively). There was no significant difference in preoperative and postoperative vertical coma values between the two groups (P = 0.735 and P = 0.583, respectively).&#x0D; Conclusions: In terms of HOAs, total RMS values decreased significantly and vertical coma values increased significantly at 3 months postoperatively in both PRK and LASIK groups. However, there were no differences between the two groups.

Wavefront-guided myopic laser in situ keratomileusis with a high-resolution Hartmann-Shack aberrometer and a new nomogram.

To evaluate visual, refractive, aberrometric, and patient-reported outcomes of wavefront-guided (WFG) myopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) using a high-resolution Hartmann-Shack aberrometer (iDesign Advanced WaveScan system) with a new nomogram and to determine whether the new nomogram resolved the mild undercorrection that occurs with the manufacturer's default settings. Three private LASIK practices. Prospective, open-label, noncomparative, multicenter study. One hundred ninety eyes of 95 patients underwent bilateral WFG LASIK for the correction of myopia or myopic astigmatism. A new nomogram was used, which effectively adjusted the wavefront-measured refraction sphere up or down to equal the manifest refraction sphere. Patients were followed up for 6 months. Eighty-four patients completed the final follow up. At 6 months, 162 (96.4%) of 168 eyes achieved monocular uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/20 or better. No eye lost 2 or more lines of corrected distance visual acuity. The safety and efficacy indices were 1.12 and 1.09, respectively; 164 (98%) of 168 eyes had manifest refraction spherical equivalent within ±0.50 diopters (D) of emmetropia, and 154 (92%) of 168 eyes had residual manifest refractive astigmatism of 0.50 D or less. Fewer patients experienced burning, stinging, soreness, and irritation postoperatively than preoperatively. Eighty-one (96%) of 84 patients reported improved quality of life. WFG myopic LASIK using a high-resolution Hartmann-Shack aberrometer and a new nomogram resolved the undercorrection with the manufacturer's default settings. The treatment was safe and effective with excellent visual and refractive outcomes, high patient satisfaction, and improved quality of life.

Visual and Refractive Outcomes with a New Topography-integrated Wavefront-guided Lasik Procedure

ABSTRACT Purpose To evaluate the clinical outcomes of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) using a new approach for the calculation of the ablation profile based on wavefront vertexing from pupil plane to corneal. Methods One hundred eyes of 50 patients (age, 21–41 years) with low and moderate myopia were enrolled in this prospective case series. All of them underwent topography-integrated wavefront-guided (TI-WFG) LASIK using the STAR S4IR excimer laser platform (Johnson & Johnson Vision). Visual, refractive, ocular aberrometric, ocular scattering index (OSI) and patient satisfaction outcomes were evaluated after a 90-day follow-up period. Astigmatic changes were evaluated by vector analysis. Results A significant reduction in sphere and cylinder (p < .001) was observed, with a significant improvement in uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) (p < .001). Postoperative spherical equivalent was within ±0.50 and ±1.00 D in 91.1% (82/90) and 98.9% (89/90) of eyes, respectively. UDVA was 20/20 or better in 98.9% (89/90) of eyes. A total of 50.0% (45/90) of eyes gained 1 line of CDVA. Mean postoperative astigmatic correction index and angle of error were 1.01 ± 0.56 and 0.17 ± 0.18º. Postoperative high-order aberrometric coefficients were below 0.50 μm in 92.2% (83/90) of eyes. Mean postoperative OSI was 0.71 ± 0.44. All patients referred to be satisfied with the final outcomes and would recommend the procedure to their friends and relatives. Conclusions TI-WFG LASIK is a new approach for myopia and myopic astigmatism correction, with preservation of the ocular optical quality and high level of patient satisfaction associated.

Pyramidal Aberrometry in Wavefront-Guided Myopic LASIK.

To evaluate measurement repeatability and clinical results for pyramidal aberrometry in routine myopic wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). Results from 265 consecutive eyes treated with myopic wavefront-guided LASIK using the Amaris 1050RS Excimer Laser and Peramis pyramidal aberrometer (SCHWIND eye-tech-solutions GmbH) were reviewed. Limits of repeatability were calculated for the aberrometric refraction spherical equivalent and higher order aberrations for the Peramis aberrometer using results from three consecutive scans acquired preoperatively and postoperatively for the first 100 eyes treated. The 95% limits of repeatability for pyramidal aberrometric measurement were: 0.3 diopters (D) for sphere, 0.2 D for cylinder, and 0.1 D (dioptric equivalent) for 3rd and 4th order aberration indices. A total of 95% of eyes were within ±0.50 D of the manifest refraction spherical equivalent target postoperatively. Uncorrected distance visual acuity was 20/20 or better in 96% of 232 eyes with a plano refraction target outcome. A total of 97% of eyes had a refraction cylinder of 0.50 D or less. No eyes lost one or more line of corrected distance visual acuity. These data demonstrate good measurement repeatability, safety, and efficacy for pyramidal aberrometry in routine myopic LASIK. [J Refract Surg. 2020;36(7):442-448.].

SMILE, Topography-Guided LASIK, and Wavefront-Guided LASIK: Review of Clinical Outcomes in Premarket Approval FDA Studies.

To review clinical outcomes of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration premarket approval (PMA) studies of the three recently approved refractive surgery platforms for the correction of spherocylindrical myopia. Clinical outcomes and vector analysis of astigmatism were reviewed and compared between wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) (WFG group) (STAR S4 IR with iDesign aberrometer; Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc., Santa Ana, CA), topography-guided LASIK (TOPO group) (Allegretto Wave Eye-Q laser; Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, TX), and small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE group) (VisuMax laser; Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany). The number of eyes included was 304, 249, and 334 for the SMILE, TOPO, and WFG groups, respectively. The WFG group had the highest preoperative spherical equivalent refraction (-6.21 ± 2.78 diopters [D]), followed by the SMILE (-5.39 ± 2.30 D) and TOPO (-4.61 ± 2.43 D) groups. At 6 months postoperatively, 83.7%, 88.9%, and 82.6% of eyes in the SMILE, TOPO, and WFG groups, respectively, had uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) of 20/20 or better. SMILE showed slower visual recovery at early postoperative examinations, whereas the WFG group had a decrease in UDVA over time due to refractive regression. The mean refractive cylinder changed from -1.53 ± 0.70 D preoperatively to -0.22 ± 0.33 D at 6 months postoperatively in the SMILE group, -1.19 ± 1.23 to -0.19 ± 0.30 D in the TOPO group, and -1.77 ± 1.65 to -0.33 ± 0.36 D in the WFG group. With all three procedures, undercorrection of refractive cylinder was seen with increasing attempted correction. All three procedures demonstrated excellent outcomes, considering differences in attempted correction between studies. No obvious superiority of one technique over the others was found in astigmatic correction. [J Refract Surg. 2019;35(11):690-698.].

Prospective, Randomized, Contralateral Eye Comparison of Wavefront-Guided and Wavefront-Optimized Laser in Situ Keratomileusis

To compare outcomes in wavefront-optimized (WFO) laser insitu keratomileusis (LASIK) to high-resolution wavefront-guided (WFG) LASIK. Randomized, fellow eye controlled, clinical trial. A total of 200 eyes of 100 patients with myopia or compound myopic astigmatism undergoing bilateral LASIK between October 2015 and February 2017 underwent wavefront-optimized (WFO) LASIK in 1 eye and wavefront-guided (WFG) LASIK in the fellow eye. Each eye was evaluated for uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), contrast sensitivity, refractive error, and wavefront aberrometry. Outcome measurement primarily UDVA at 12months. Secondary outcomes were safety, predictability, stability, refractive error, CDVA, contrast sensitivity, and higher-order aberrations at 12months. WFG LASIK had higher levels of supervision and better contrast sensitivity compared to WFO. Both types had excellent postoperative UDVA results, without a significant difference in either mean UDVA or frequency of achieving a specified UDVA, for example, 20/16 or better (all P > 0.05). The mean gain in lines of CDVA was significantly higher in the WFG than in the WFO group (0.80 ± 0.75 vs 0.62 ±0.72, respectively; P= 0.04). The WFG cohort had significantly better contrast sensitivity for mean and frequency of achieving >20/40 for <5% low-contrast sensitivity (37.1%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 27.5-46.7 vs 24.7%; 95% CI, 16.2-33.3, respectively; P=0.01) and >20/32 for <25% low-contrast sensitivity (10.3%; 95% CI, 4.3-16.4 vs 4%, respectively; 95% CI, 0.0-8.1, respectively; P= 0.04). The WFO group had a significantly higher frequency of <0.25 diopters (D) of refractive astigmatism at 12months (82.5%; 95% CI, 75.0-90.0; vs 72.1%, respectively; 95% CI, 63.2-81.2; P= 0.02) but not <0.50 D (95.6%; 95% CI, 91.9-99.8; vs 96.9, respectively; 95% CI, 93.5-100; P= 0.61). The WFG group was significantly closer to emmetropia for both sphere and spherical equivalents at all time points. Trefoil was significantly lower in the WFG group and was also significantly lower than preoperative measurements. Wavefront-optimized and high-resolution wavefront-guided LASIK achieve excellent visual outcomes. Nonetheless, treatments based on a high-resolution aberrometer appear to offer superior results in some regards.

Dissatisfaction After Trifocal IOL Implantation and Its Improvement by Selective Wavefront-Guided LASIK.

To evaluate a substantially improved wavefront acquisition technique (Peramis; SCHWIND eye-tech-solutions, Kleinostheim, Germany) for selective wavefront-guided aberration correction to improve satisfaction after implantation of trifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs). Of 213 eyes from 108 consecutive patients receiving cataract surgery with multifocal IOL implantation (FineVision; PhysIOL, Liége, Belgium), 56 eyes (26%) of 42 dissatisfied patients were treated with selective wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) (Amaris 1050; SCHWIND eye-tech-solutions) free of cost with a follow-up of 12 months. Selective wavefront-guided ablation corrected for all aberrations except spherical aberrations to preserve the apodization and therefore to enhance the multifocal effect. The degree of satisfaction after trifocal IOL implantation, its increase after selective wavefront-guided LASIK, and the refractive error (spherical equivalent, refractive astigmatism) before and after selective wavefront-guided LASIK were evaluated. Refractive astigmatism of greater than 0.50 diopters (D) was the most frequent residual refractive error (63%), followed by myopia (45%), hyperopia (20%), and increased ocular higher order aberrations (13%). After selective wavefront-guided LASIK, the refractive target (±0.50 D) was achieved in 98% and refractive astigmatism was 0.50 D or less in 93% of the eyes operated on. The overall satisfaction score in dissatisfied patients increased from 2.1 ± 0.8 preoperatively to 3.6 ± 0.8 (out of 4). Eighty-eight percent of initially dissatisfied patients would choose this procedure again. Selective wavefront-guided LASIK reduced refractive errors and significantly increased spectacle independence and satisfaction, which may lead to a better acceptance of trifocal IOLs. [J Refract Surg. 2019;35(6):346-352.].

Patient-reported vision-related quality of life after bilateral wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis

To evaluate functional vision and quality-of-life outcomes after bilateral wavefront-guided laser insitu keratomileusis (LASIK). Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA. Prospective case series. Visual acuity, refractive error, and aberrometric measurements were obtained preoperatively and 1, 6, and 12months after bilateral wavefront-guided LASIK. The Refractive Status and Vision Profile questionnaire scores were completed at each timepoint and compared with baseline scores. The study comprised 84 eyes of 42 patients (aged 24 to 47years). At 1year, 76 eyes (90.5%) had an uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/20 or better and 88.1% of patients were satisfied with their vision without correction. Total refractive status and vision profile scores improved significantly from a mean of 30.9 points at baseline to 20.7 points 1year postoperatively (P<.001). The visual function, perceptions, and problems with corrective lenses subscales statistically significantly improved from preoperatively to postoperatively (all P<.001). In contrast, the driving (P=.286) and visual symptoms subscales (P=.199) did not show significant changes from baseline to 1year. Wavefront-guided LASIK not only afforded clinically measurable improvements in vision but also significant improvements in subjective functional vision and vision-related quality of life 1year after surgery.

Recent advances in wavefront-guided LASIK.

Laser vision correction remains an active area of research, and there have been many recent advances in the field. The purpose of this review is to provide an update on the recent advances for one of the most common methods of laser vision correction, wavefront-guided laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK). Recent technological advancements in wavefront aberrometry are largely responsible for the improved visual outcomes that have been recently reported. In addition, improvements in femtosecond and excimer laser technology, used in flap creation and corneal ablation, have been shown to provide superior results when compared to microkeratomes and earlier lasers. Wavefront-guided LASIK appears to have advantages over some other keratorefractive modalities in terms of visual acuity, predictability, astigmatism correction, and subjective visual symptoms. Nonetheless, there may be some limitations in highly aberrated corneas, and also in biomechanical stability relative to other available platforms. Improvements in wavefront aberrometry, and also femtosecond and excimer lasers, have continued to improve our ability to correct refractive errors. Wavefront-guided LASIK remains a well tolerated and effective keratorefractive procedure, with a trend toward superiority. Nonetheless, further studies comparing this modality to others are needed to define the role each can serve.

Comparison of optical quality after implantable collamer lens implantation and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis.

To compare the optical quality after implantation of implantable collamer lens (ICL) and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis (WG-LASIK). The study included 40 eyes of 22 patients with myopia who accepted ICL implantation and 40 eyes of 20 patients with myopia who received WG-LASIK. Before surgery and three months after surgery, the objective scattering index (OSI), the values of modulation transfer function (MTF) cutoff frequency, Strehl ratio, and the Optical Quality Analysis System (OQAS) values (OVs) were accessed. The higher order aberrations (HOAs) data including coma, trefoil, spherical, 2nd astigmatism and tetrafoil were also obtained. For patients with pupil size <6 mm, HOAs data were analyzed for 4 mm-pupil diameter. For patients with pupil size ≥6 mm, HOAs data were calculated for 6 mm-pupil diameter. Visual acuity, refraction, pupil size and intraocular pressures were also recorded. In both ICL and WG-LASIK group, significant improvements in visual acuities were found postoperatively, with a significant reduction in spherical equivalent (P< 0.001). After the ICL implantation, the OSI decreased slightly from 2.34±1.92 to 2.24±1.18 with no statistical significance (P=0.62). While in WG-LASIK group, the OSI significantly increased from 0.68±0.43 preoperatively to 0.91±0.53 postoperatively (Wilcoxon signed ranks test, P=0.000). None of the mean MTF cutoff frequency, Strehl ratio, OVs showed statistically significant changes in both ICL and WG-LASIK groups. In the ICL group, there were no statistical differences in the total HOAs for either 4 mm-pupil or 6 mm-pupil. In the WG-LASIK group, the HOA parameters increased significantly at 4 mm-pupil. The total ocular HOAs, coma, spherical and 2nd astigmatism were 0.12±0.06, 0.06±0.03, 0.00±0.03, 0.02±0.01, respectively. After the operation, these values were increased into 0.16±0.07, 0.08±0.05, -0.04±0.04, 0.03±0.01 respectively (Wilcoxon signed ranks test, all P<0.05). At 6 mm-pupil, the induction of total HOAs was not statistically significant in the WG-LASIK group. ICL implantation has a less disturbance to optical quality than WG-LASIK. The OQAS is a valuable complementary measurement to the wavefront aberrometers in evaluating the optical quality.

Comparative analysis of outcomes after wavefront-guided and wavefront-optimized laser in-situ keratomileusis in high myopic eyes

Purpose The aim was to evaluate and compare the clinical outcomes after laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in high myopia using wavefront-guided (WFG) and wavefront-optimized (WFO) ablation profiles provided by two different excimer laser platforms. Patients and methods Prospective, consecutive, comparative, and masked clinical trial including 41 high myopic eyes treated with WFG LASIK using the Advanced CustomVue system (WFG group) and 40 eyes treated with a WFO profile using the Allegretto EX-500 platform (WFO group). Visual, refractive, contrast sensitivity (CVS-1000), and aberrometric outcomes were evaluated in both groups of eyes during a 6-month follow-up. Results The efficacy index was significantly better in the WFG group compared with the WFO (1.01±0.11 vs. 0.96±0.12, P=0.038). The safety index was also significantly better in the WFG group (1.03±0.12 vs. 0.94±0.11, P=0.011). All eyes achieved postoperatively an uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/25 or better in the WFG group, whereas 87.5% of eyes achieved this uncorrected distance visual acuity in the WFO group. More eyes gained one line of corrected distance visual acuity in the WFG group (36.5 vs. 15.0%, P=0.015). Significantly lower postoperative manifest refraction spherical equivalent (P=0.045) and cylinder (P=0.005) were found in the WFG group. Manifest refraction spherical equivalent was within ±1.00 D in 90.3% and 80% of eyes in WFG and WFO groups, respectively (P=0.001). Contrast sensitivity decreased significantly only in the WFO group (P≤0.0397). More significant increase in high-order aberrations was found in the WFO group (P≤0.005). Conclusion WFG LASIK provides better efficacy, safety, predictability, and preservation of visual quality in high myopic eyes than WFO LASIK.

Vector analysis of astigmatic changes and optical quality outcomes after wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis using a high-resolution aberrometer

To assess the ocular optical quality results as well as theastigmatic changes after wavefront-guided laser insitu keratomileusis (LASIK) in eyes with myopic astigmatism. Instituto Clínico-Quirúrgico Oftalmológico, Bilbao, Vizcaya, Spain. Prospective case series. Thirty-three eyes having wavefront-guided LASIK with the Star S4IR excimer laser combined with the iDesign system were enrolled in the study. Changes in visual acuity, refraction, higher-order aberrations, and ocular scattering index (OSI) were evaluated during a 3-month follow-up. The Alpins method was used to analyze the astigmatic changes. A significant reduction was observed in refraction (P<.001), with significant improvement in uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuities (P<.001). All eyes had a spherical equivalent within ±0.50 diopter (D) and UDVA of 20/25 or better at 90days after surgery. A total of 27.3% of eyes gained lines of CDVA. No significant changes were observed in primary coma and spherical aberration (P≥.551). Likewise, no significant changes were observed in OSI (P=.361), with a mean 90-day postoperative value of 0.66±0.58 (SD). A significant change to negative values of the magnitude of error (P=.007) and a significant decrease in the correction index (P=.004) were observed during the follow-up, with mean 90-day postoperative values of -0.24±0.28 D and 0.86±0.17 D, respectively. Wavefront-guided LASIK using a high-resolution aberrometer provided safe and efficacious correction of myopic astigmatism, with preservation of the ocular optical quality.

Vector analysis of astigmatic changes after small-incision lenticule extraction and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis

To evaluate and compare the efficacy of the astigmatic correction after wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and in myopic eyes. Prospective case series. Horus Vision Correction Center and Ellite Vision Correction Center, Alexandria, Egypt. Myopic eyes with astigmatism up to 4.00 diopters (D) had wavefront-guided LASIK or small-incision lenticule extraction. Visual and refractive changes were evaluated during a 6-month follow-up. The astigmatic changes were evaluated using the Alpins method. The study evaluated 107 eyes (55 patients), 52 eyes havingwavefront-guided LASIK and 55 eyes, small-incision lenticule extraction. No statistically significant differences were found in the 6-month postoperative sphere between the 2 groups (P=.652). The postoperative manifest cylinder and spherical equivalent were significantly lower in the wavefront-guided LASIK group (P<.001). The 6-month postoperative cylinder was 0.50 D or less in all eyes in the wavefront-guided LASIK groups and in 79.8% in the small-incision lenticule extraction group (P<.001). Vector analysis showed a significantly higher difference vector (P<.001) and angle of error (P=.021) and a significantly lower correction index (P=.001) in the small-incision lenticule extraction group. The mean magnitude of error was -0.07±0.20 (SD) and -0.20±0.35 in the wavefront-guided LASIK group and small-incision lenticule extraction group, respectively (P=.012). Wavefront-guided LASIK and small-incision lenticule extraction were safe and effective for the correction of myopic astigmatism, although there was a trend toward undercorrection with small-incision lenticule extraction.

Comparative analysis of the efficacy of astigmatic correction after wavefront-guided and wavefront-optimized LASIK in low and moderate myopic eyes.

To evaluate and compare the efficacy of the astigmatic correction achieved with laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in eyes with myopic astigmatism using wavefront-guided (WFG) and wavefront-optimized (WFO) ablation profiles. Prospective study included 221 eyes undergoing LASIK: 99 and 122 eyes with low and moderate myopic astigmatism (low and moderate myopia groups). Two subgroups were differentiated in each group according to the ablation profile: WFG subgroup, 109 eyes (45/64, low/moderate myopia groups) treated using the Advanced CustomVue platform (Abbott Medical Optics Inc.), and WFO subgroup, 112 eyes (54/58, low/moderate myopia groups) treated using the EX-500 platform (Alcon). Clinical outcomes were evaluated during a 6-month follow-up, including a vector analysis of astigmatic changes. Significantly better postoperative uncorrected visual acuity and efficacy index was found in the WFG subgroups of each group (P≤0.041). Postoperative spherical equivalent and cylinder were significantly higher in WFO subgroups (P≤0.003). In moderate myopia group, a higher percentage of eyes with a postoperative cylinder ≤0.25 D was found in the WFG subgroup (90.6% vs 65.5%, P=0.002). In low and moderate myopia groups, the difference vector was significantly higher in the WFO subgroup compared to WFG (P<0.001). In moderate myopia group, the magnitude (P=0.008) and angle of error (P<0.001) were also significantly higher in the WFO subgroup. Significantly less induction of high order aberrations were found with WFG treatments in both low and moderate myopia groups (P≤0.006). A more efficacious correction of myopic astigmatism providing a better visual outcome is achieved with WFG LASIK compared to WFO LASIK.

Visual, aberrometric, photic phenomena, and patient satisfaction after myopic wavefront-guided LASIK using a high-resolution aberrometer.

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the visual, refractive, and aberrometric outcomes as well as the level of patient satisfaction and photic phenomena after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery using wavefront-guided (WFG) ablations based on measurements obtained with a high-resolution aberrometer.Patients and methodsThis study was a prospective analysis including 253 eyes of 127 patients (aged between 19 years and 54 years) undergoing WFG LASIK using the STAR S4 IR Excimer Laser System combined with the iDesign System and iFS Femtosecond Laser. Visual, refractive, and aberrometric outcomes during a 2-month follow-up as well as patient satisfaction and photic phenomena were evaluated by means of a questionnaire.ResultsA total of 85% (215/253) and 99% (251/253) of eyes achieved a postoperative (Postop) uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/16 and 20/20, respectively, and all eyes achieved an uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/25. Postop spherical equivalent values were within ±0.25 D and ±0.50 D in 97% and 100% of eyes, respectively. Likewise, manifest cylinder was <0.25 D in 97% (245/253) of eyes. A statistically significant reduction was found in the total root mean square (P<0.001) and in the level of primary spherical aberration (P=0.001). Postop difficulties related to vision were graded as minimal, with low levels of photic phenomena and high levels of patient satisfaction. The level of difficulty to perform daily activities and the level of glare perceived by patients while driving car were significantly decreased (P<0.001).ConclusionWFG LASIK surgery using the technology evaluated is predictable and effective for the correction of myopia and leads to high levels of patient satisfaction.

Comparison of Higher Order Aberrations after Wavefront-guided LASIK and PRK: One Year Follow-Up Results.

Purpose:To evaluate the changes and predictability of higher order aberrations (HOAs) after personalized laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and personalized photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for simple myopia and compound myopic astigmatism.Methods:In this prospective cross-sectional study, 100 eyes were included. A total of 50 eyes underwent personalized LASIK and 50 eyes underwent personalized PRK. Preoperative and postoperative wavefront data were compared between the two groups. The influential factors and predictability of HOAs were also assessed.Result:Total HOA increased in the amount of 0.01 ± 0.14 μm for the 5 mm pupil (P = 0.55) and 0.08 ± 0.22 μm for the 6 mm pupil (P = 0.02) after PRK; however after LASIK the corresponding values for the 5 and 6 mm pupil sizes were 0.05 ± 0.12 and 0.15 ± 0.18 μm, respectively (P < 0. 001). Mean changes were not significantly different between the PRK and LASIK groups for both 5 and 6 mm pupil sizes (P = 0.21 and P = 0.13, respectively). Spherical aberration increased following LASIK more than following PRK (P < 0.001). Changes in the root mean square (RMS) of total HOA had a statistically significant negative correlation (P < 0.001) with its preoperative value. HOA and spherical aberration reduced in majority of eyes when the preoperative spherical equivalent refraction was low.Conclusion:For the 6mm pupil size, the total HOA increased following both personalized PRK and LASIK with no significant difference between the two groups. Change of the total HOA RMS was influenced by the preoperative values. The known influencing factors could predict nearly 50% of the changes in total HOA.