Wave In Heifers Research Articles

Synchronization of follicle wave emergence before ovarian superstimulation with FSH and ovum pick-up improves in vitro embryo production in pregnant heifers

The objective of the present study was to evaluate effects of synchronization of timing of follicle wave emergence, before ovarian superstimulation and ovum pick-up (OPU), on ovarian response and embryo production in pregnant heifers. Pregnant (47–69 days of gestation) Holstein heifers (n = 64), 19.0 ± 0.3 months of age, were assigned in a completely randomized design to one of two groups: synchronization of follicular wave emergence using follicle ablation (Synchronized) or untreated control (Non-synchronized). Superstimulatory treatments consisting of 160 mg (280 IU) of porcine follicle stimulating hormone (p-FSH), administered in four decreasing dose treatments 12 h apart, were initiated 36 h after follicle ablation or at random stages of the follicular wave in heifers of the Synchronized and Non-synchronized group, respectively. Ovum pick-up was performed in all heifers 40 h after the last p-FSH administration and retrieved cumulus oocyte complexes (COCs) were subjected to in vitro embryo production (IVEP) procedures. Ultrasonography was performed immediately before OPU to determine number and size of ovarian follicles. Differences in treatment responses between groups were evaluated using generalized linear mixed models. Total number of follicles at the time of OPU was not different between treatment groups (P = 0.61), however, the number of small follicles (<6 mm) was greater (P = 0.05) in heifers of the Non-synchronized group, whereas number of medium size follicles (6–10 mm) tended (P = 0.09) to be greater in heifers of the Synchronized group. Heifers in the Synchronized group had a greater (P = 0.01) percentage of medium sized follicles and a lesser (P = 0.01) percentage of smaller sized follicles than heifers in the Non-synchronized group. There were no differences (P > 0.15) in total number of recovered COCs, or number of viable COCs between groups. Cleavage percentage (84.5% and 72.8%) and blastocyst percentage (48.2% and 33.4%) were greater (P < 0.01) in heifers of the Synchronized than Non-synchronized group, respectively. As a result, mean number of blastocysts per OPU/heifer was greater (P = 0.006) in the heifers of the Synchronized (8.9 ± 1.0) than the Non-synchronized (5.5 ± 0.9) group. In conclusion, synchronizing the time of follicle wave emergence in pregnant heifers, prior to ovarian superstimulation with FSH and OPU results in a greater superstimulatory response and oocyte competence leading to greater embryo production.

Blood flow to follicles and CL during development of the periovulatory follicular wave in heifers

The hemodynamics of the developing CL and the future dominant follicle (DF) was studied in 22 heifers during wave 1 on Days 0 to 5 (Day 0 = ovulation). Color-Doppler ultrasonography was used to determine the resistance index (RI) at the most prominent Doppler signal in an ovarian arterial branch before entry into the ovary; a decrease in RI indicates a downstream increase in vascular perfusion. The RI for each of four intraovarian patterns averaged over days was different (P < 0.05) from each of the other patterns as follows: DF–CL (DF and CL in the same ovary), 0.52 ± 0.02; CL alone, 0.60 ± 0.01; DF alone, 0.67 ± 0.01; neither DF nor CL, 0.78 ± 0.01. The differences in RI among intraovarian patterns began on Day 0 or 1, indicating that the extent of vascular perfusion on Days 0 to 5 for the various patterns may have been influenced by events that occurred before ovulation. The percentage of the DF wall with color-flow signals was greater (P < 0.05) in the DF–CL pattern than in the DF pattern on each of Days 2 to 5 and was greater (P < 0.0001) in the DF–CL pattern when the DF was adjacent to the CL (40.2 ± 2.0%) than when separated (24.5 ± 1.9%). Dimensions of DF (P < 0.01) and CL (P < 0.02) were greater when adjacent to each other. The results supported the hypotheses for wave 1 that (1) vascular perfusion is greater for the DF–CL intraovarian pattern than for the DF or CL pattern and (2) the extent of blood-flow Doppler signals in the wall of the developing DF is greater for the DF–CL pattern than for the DF pattern. Our preferred interpretation is that a change in vascular perfusion of the CL is accompanied by a similar change in perfusion of the DF when the two structures are in the same ovary especially adjacent.

Intraovarian effect of dominant follicle and corpus luteum on number of follicles during a follicular wave in heifers

The intraovarian relationships among dominant follicle (DF), corpus luteum (CL), and number of follicles between Days 0 to 5 (Day 0 = ovulation) in wave 1 (n = 65 waves) and Days 9 to 13 in wave 2 (n = 62) were analyzed in separate experiments in Bos taurus heifers. Ovaries were grouped into intraovarian patterns of DF–CL, DF alone, CL alone, and neither DF nor CL. In wave 1, the pattern frequencies of DF–CL or neither DF nor CL (34% each) were greater (P < 0.0004) than for DF alone or CL alone (16% each). The number of growing follicles ≥5.0 mm, was greater (P < 0.0001) in ovaries with the DF, even when the DF was removed from the tally (P < 0.03). In a factorial analysis of wave 1, there was a positive main effect of DF (3.9 ± 0.2 vs. 2.2 ± 0.2 follicles; P < 0.0001), but the main effect of CL and the interaction of DF and CL were not significant. In a factorial analysis of wave 2, there were more (P < 0.0001) follicles greater than 6 mm in ovaries with a DF when the DF was included and an approaching difference (P < 0.09) when the DF was excluded. The main effect of CL and the interaction of DF and CL were not significant. The hypothesis that both the DF and CL have a positive intraovarian effect on number of follicles in waves 1 and 2 was only partly supported; the DF, but not the CL, had an effect in the factorial analyses. Previous reports in cattle and sheep of a positive intraovarian effect of CL on number of follicles are questionable in that location of the DF was not considered.

Relationship between days of the luteolytic period and locations of the preovulatory follicle and CL in interovulatory intervals with two or three follicular waves in heifers

Diameter of follicles was determined every 12 hours and progesterone (P4), FSH, and LH concentrations were determined every 6 hours from Day 12 (Day 0 = ovulation) to the ovulation at the end of the interovulatory interval (IOI). Groups were assigned on the basis of an ipsilateral (Ipsi) versus contralateral (Contra) relationship between the preovulatory follicle and CL and two follicular waves (2W) versus three waves (3W) per IOI. Numbers of IOIs were Ipsi-2W (n = 6), Ipsi-3W (n = 6), and Contra-3W (n = 8). Normalization to the end of luteolysis (day that P4 was closest to 1.0 ng/mL) indicated for the first time that concentrations of P4 and FSH were greater (P < 0.05) in 3W IOIs than in 2W IOIs for the 3 days before the beginning of a P4 decrease. The beginning of a P4 decrease occurred about 5 days and 6 hours after emergence of the preovulatory wave at 6 mm in 2W and 3W IOIs, respectively. On the day of diameter deviation between the future dominant and largest subordinate follicles in wave 3 of 3W IOIs, the future dominant follicle had the following characteristics: (1) distribution of diameters differed (P < 0.01) from unimodality; (2) diameter was greater (P < 0.05) in the Contra-3W group (9.8 ± 0.4 mm) than in the Ipsi-3W group (8.8 ± 0.3 mm); (3) diameter was similar to the diameter at the beginning of the P4 decrease (9.6 ± 0.9 mm); and (4) diameter was as small or smaller than diameter of the largest subordinate in seven of 14 heifers compared with zero of seven heifers in wave 2 of 2W IOIs. The differences involving deviation may be related to a reported greater frequency of the Contra-3W group than Ipsi-3W group. Results supported the hypothesis that emergence of the ovulatory wave occurs well before the beginning of luteolysis in 2W IOIs and near the beginning of luteolysis in 3W IOIs.

Hormone concentrations temporally associated with contralateral and ipsilateral relationships between the CL and preovulatory follicle during the third follicular wave in heifers

Concentrations of circulating hormones after Day 14 (Day 0 = ovulation) were determined daily in 87 interovulatory intervals (IOIs) in heifers. The IOIs were grouped into four permutations according to an ipsilateral (Ipsi) or contralateral (Contra) relationship between the CL and the preovulatory follicle and two (2W) or three (3W) follicular waves per IOI. The number of IOIs per group differed (P < 0.005) from equality among the Ipsi-2W (n = 27), Contra-2W (n = 31), Ipsi-3W (n = 9), and Contra-3W (n = 20) groups. A continuous decrease in progesterone (luteolysis) began later (P < 0.05) in the Contra-3W group (Day 18.0 ± 0.4) than in each of the Ipsi-2W (15.4 ± 0.2), Contra-2W (15.6 ± 0.2), and Ipsi-3W (16.2 ± 0.5) groups. Concentrations of LH and estradiol began to increase near the beginning of luteolysis in each group. A minor FSH surge that did not stimulate a major follicular wave developed in about 50% of the IOIs in each group, except that none were detected in the Ipsi-3W group. The minor FSH surge reached a peak about 4 days before ovulation and several days after wave 3 had emerged. The hypothesis that luteolysis begins earliest in two-wave IOIs, intermediate in three-wave IOIs with an ipsilateral CL/follicle relationship, and latest in three-wave IOIs with a contralateral relationship was supported. The hypothesis that a minor FSH surge occurs most frequently in association with three follicular waves was not supported.

Contralateral ovarian location between the future ovulatory follicle and extant corpus luteum increases the length of the luteal phase and number of follicular waves in heifers

Location of the future ovulatory follicle and CL in the same ovary (ipsilateral) or opposite ovaries (contralateral) and number of major follicular waves (two or three) per interovulatory interval (IOI) was studied in 14 heifers. Follicle diameter and a blood sample for progesterone (P4) assay were obtained each day throughout an IOI. Heifers were partitioned into three groups: ipsilateral follicle/CL relationship and two follicular waves (Ipsi-2W, N = 5), contralateral relationship and two follicular waves (Contra-2W, N = 5), and contralateral relationship and three waves (Contra-3W, N = 4). Only one heifer had an ipsilateral relationship and three waves and was not included in the analyses. An unexpected observation was slower growth of the dominant follicle of Wave 1 in the Ipsi-2W group than in the Contra-2W and Contra-3W groups. Increased P4 production in the Contra-3W group compared with the Ipsi-2W and Contra-2W groups was indicated by significantly greater P4 concentration averaged over Days 0 to 20 (Day 0 = ovulation), longer interval from ovulation to the beginning of a decrease in P4 and to the beginning of postluteolysis (P4 <1 ng/mL), and longer IOI. The interval from the beginning of postluteolysis to ovulation was not different among groups, indicating that the prolonged IOI reflected the prolonged luteal phase. An effect of the follicle/CL relationship on length of the IOI was not detected in mares. Results supported the hypothesis that the prolonged luteal phase of the contralateral follicle/CL relationship favors the development of three follicular waves/IOI in heifers.

Effects of oxytocin on cloprostenol-induced luteolysis, follicular growth, ovulation and corpus luteum function in heifers

Twenty-five normally cyclic Holstein heifers were used to examine the effects of oxytocin on cloprostenol-induced luteolysis, subsequent ovulation, and early luteal and follicular development. The heifers were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 treatments: Group SC-SC (n = 6), Group SC-OT (n = 6), Group OT-SC (n = 6) and Group OT-OT (n = 7). The SC-SC and SC-OT groups received continuous saline infusion, while Groups OT-SC and OT-OT received continuous oxytocin infusion (1:9 mg/d) on Days 14 to 26 after estrus. All animals received 500 μg, im cloprostenol 2 d after initiation of infusion (Day 16) to induce luteolysis. Groups SC-OT and OT-OT received oxytocin twice daily (12 h apart) (0.33 USP units/kg body weight, sc) on Days 3 to 6 of the estrous cycle following cloprostenol-induced luteolysis, while Groups SC-SC and OT-SC received an equivalent volume of saline. Daily plasma progesterone (P 4) concentrations prior to cloprostenol-induced luteolysis and rates of decline in P 4 following the induced luteolysis did not differ between oxytocin-infused (OT-OT and OT-SC) and saline-infused (SC-SC and SC-OT) groups (P>0.1). Duration of the estrous cycle was shortened in saline-infused heifers receiving oxytocin daily during the first week of the estrous cycle. In contrast, oxytocin injections did not result in premature inhibition of luteal function and return to estrus in heifers that received oxytocin infusion (OT-OT). Day of ovulation, size of ovulating follicle and time of peak LH after cloprostenol administration for oxytocin and saline-treated control heifers did not differ (P>0.1). During the first 3 d of the estrous cycle following luteal regression, fewer (P<0.01) follicles of all classes were observed in the oxytocin-infused animals. Day of emergence of the first follicular wave in heifers treated with oxytocin was delayed (P < 0.05). The results show that continuous infusion of oxytocin during the mid-luteal stage of the estrous cycle has no effect on cloprostenol-induced luteal regression, timing of preovulatory LH peak or ovulation. Further, the finding support that an episodic rather than continuous administration of oxytocin during the first week of the estrous cycle results in premature loss of luteal function. The data suggest minor inhibitory effects of oxytocin on follicular growth during the first 3 d of the estrous cycle following cloprostenol-induced luteolysis.

Effect of LH or GnRH on the dominant follicle of the first follicular wave in beef heifers.

A study was designed to characterise ovarian follicular dynamics in heifers treated with porcine luteinizing hormone (pLH) or gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) on days 3, 6 or 9 (ovulation = day 0), corresponding to the growing, early-static, and late-static phases of the first follicular wave. Following ovulation, 65 beef heifers were assigned, by replicate, to the following seven treatment groups: 25 mg im of pLH on days 3, 6 or 9 (n = 9 per group); 100 microg im of GnRH on days 3, 6 or 9 (n = 9 per group); or controls (no treatment; n = 11). Ovulation occurred within 36 h in 67%, 100% and 67% of heifers treated with pLH and in 89%, 56% and 22% of heifers treated with GnRH on days 3, 6 or 9, respectively (treatment-by-day interaction, P < 0.09). Combined for all treatment days, ovulation rates were 78% and 56% in pLH- and GnRH-treated groups, respectively (P < 0.09). Overall, mean day (+/- SD) of emergence of the second follicular wave in heifers that ovulated was different from that in controls or in heifers that did not ovulate (P < 0.05). Mean (+/- SD) day of emergence of the second wave occurred earlier (day 5.6+/-1.2; P < 0.05) in heifers that ovulated after treatment on day 3 (n = 14) than in controls (day 8.7+/-1.6; n = 11); however, wave emergence in all heifers treated on day 6 (day 8.1+/-0.5; n = 18) did not differ from controls, regardless of whether or not ovulation occurred. In the heifers that ovulated in response to treatment on day 9 (n = 8), the emergence of the second follicular wave was delayed (day 10.9+/-0.4; P < 0.05). The day of emergence of the second wave in the 14 treated heifers that failed to ovulate, irrespective of the day of treatment (day 8.9+/-1.4) did not differ from control heifers. The emergence of the second wave was more synchronous in day 6 heifers (regardless of whether they ovulated) and in day 9 heifers that ovulated compared to control heifers (P < 0.05). Results did not support the hypothesis that the administration of pLH or GnRH at known stages of the follicular wave in cycling heifers would consistently induce ovulation or atresia and, thereby, induce emergence of a new follicular wave at a predictable interval. New wave emergence was induced consistently (1.3 days post-treatment) only in those animals that ovulated in response to treatment. However, 22% of LH-treated heifers and 44% of GnRH-treated heifers failed to ovulate. Treatments did not induce atresia of the dominant follicle or alter the interval to new wave emergence in animals that did not ovulate in response to treatment.

Follicular and hormonal dynamics during the first follicular wave in heifers

A few days after the first follicular wave emerges as 4-mm follicles, follicular deviation occurs wherein 1 follicle of the wave continues to grow (dominant follicle) while the others regress. The objectives of this study were to characterize follicle growth and associated changes in systemic concentrations of gonadotropins and estradiol at 8-h intervals encompassing the time of follicle deviation. Blood samples from heifers (n=11) were collected and the ovaries scanned by ultrasound every 8 h from 48 h before to 112 h after the maximal value for the preovulatory LH surge. The follicular wave emerged at 5.8 ±5.5 h (mean ±SEM) after the LH surge, and at this time the future dominant follicle (4.2 ±0.8 mm) was larger (P<0.001) than the future largest subordinate follicle (3.6 ±0.1 mm). There was no difference in growth rates between the 2 follicles from emergence to the beginning of the deviation (0.5 mm/8 h for each follicle), indicating that, on average, the future dominant follicle maintained a size advantage over the future subordinate follicle. Deviation occurred when the 2 largest follicles were 8.3 ±0.2 and 7.8 ±0.2 mm in diameter, at 61.0 ±3.7 h after wave emergence. Diameter deviation was manifested between 2 adjacent examinations at 8-h intervals. Mean concentrations of FSH decreased, while mean concentrations of LH increased 24 and 32 h before deviation, respectively, and remained constant (no significant differences) for several 8-h intervals encompassing deviation. In addition to the increase and decrease in circulating estradiol concentrations associated with the preovulatory LH surge, an increase (P<0.05) occurred between the beginning of deviation and 32 h after deviation. The results supported the hypotheses that deviation occurs rapidly (within 8 h), that elevated systemic LH concentrations are present during deviation, and that deviation is not preceded by an increase in systemic estradiol.

Effect of CIDR Treatment at Day 16 of Estrous Cycle on Follicular Growth in Dairy Heifers with Two or Three Follicular Waves.

To show the effect of intravaginal progesterone-releasing device (CIDR) on turnover of DF and follicular growth after CIDR insertion on day 16 of estrous cycle and to compare the follicular growth during CIDR treatment between heifers with two or three follicular waves, four heifers were given CIDR for 7 days at late luteal phase on day 16 of estrous cycle. The presence of CIDR in the vagina containing progesterone prevented for the animals to return to estrus at the normal time and significantly increased cycle length, as compared to the preceding cycle (26.3 ±0.5 vs 20.8 ±1.5 days, p<0.05). Ovarian follicular dynamics were characterized by waves of follicular development occurring at different times during the estrous cycle. In the stage 1, four heifers had two (n=2) or three (n=2) follicular waves per estrous cycle. However, during the cycle of CIDR treatment, all heifers had three follicular waves per cycle. The CIDR treatment caused an extension of dominant phase of the ovulatory DF selected in the third follicular wave in heifers with 3 follicular waves per cycle before CIDR treatment. In heifers with two follicular waves per cycle before CIDR treatment, after CIDR treatment the DF underwent atresia without delay and followed emergence of the new follicular wave, in which no extension of dominant phase of the DF or ovulatory follicle was shown. The CIDR treatment did not affect the follicular growth during the subsequent cycle. In conclusion, when CIDR treatment commenced at late luteal phase, CIDR may cause an extension of an interval from emergence to ovulation of ovulatory DF in heifer with three follicular waves. And also, the CIDR treatment does not delay atresia process of DF in preceding cycle and is developed the new follicular waves in heifers with two follicular waves per cycle before CIDR treatment

Relationship between follicular development and the decline in the follicle-stimulating hormone surge in heifers.

Experiment 1 was conducted to determine whether progesterone affects the pattern of the FSH surge or follicular development associated with a follicular wave in heifers. On Day 7 (Day 0 = ovulation), heifers were allocated into a group receiving prostaglandin F2alpha (PGF2alpha; n = 6) or a control group (n = 5). Twenty-four hours later, all detectable follicles (>/= 2 mm) were ablated (Hour 0). Follicular development was monitored Hours 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 16, at 8-h intervals thereafter until Hour 112. To monitor FSH concentrations, blood was sampled at Hours -24, 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, and 16, and at 8-h intervals thereafter until Hour 104. There were no differences (p > 0.05) between the PGF2alpha-treated group and controls in the patterns of the FSH surge or follicular development. Experiment 2 tested the hypothesis that 3-mm follicles do not have FSH-suppressing capacity and that suppression increases as follicles grow beyond 5 mm. Twenty-four hours after an injection of PGF2alpha (Days 6-8), heifers were subjected to either ablation of follicles >/= 2 mm or ovariectomy. Intact heifers were allocated into four groups (n = 5) in which all follicles of the new wave were ablated upon reaching either 3, 5, or 7 mm or were not ablated (controls). Blood was sampled at 8-h intervals to monitor FSH and estradiol-17beta. Averaged over Hours 8-120, FSH concentrations (ng/ml) were higher (p < 0.05) in the ovariectomized (2.02 +/- 0.05) and the 3-mm groups (1.91 +/- 0.05) than in the 5-mm (1.52 +/- 0.05), 7-mm (1.35 +/- 0.04), and control groups (1.33 +/- 0.05); and estradiol concentrations (pg/ml) were lower (p < 0.05) in the ovariectomized group (0.19 +/- 0.03) than in the 3-mm (1.48 +/- 0. 16), 5-mm (1.56 +/- 0.15), 7-mm (2.22 +/- 0.27), and control groups (2.55 +/- 0.49). In conclusion, the presence of endogenous progesterone did not affect FSH patterns or follicular development. Follicles </= 3 mm had no detectable capacity to suppress FSH. As follicles grew from 3 to 5 mm, they gained the capacity to suppress FSH; however, as follicles grew beyond 5 mm, FSH-suppressing capacity did not increase. The FSH decline was not attributable to an increase in circulating estradiol.

Extended function of the corpus luteum and earlier development of the second follicular wave in heifers treated with bovine somatotropin

Effects of recombinant bovine somatotropin (bST) on growth of the corpus luteum (CL) and development of ovarian follicles were tested. Starting at estrus (Day=0), the following treatments were administered: control (saline injected Days 0 to 19, n=5); bST[0–9] (25 mg bST injected Days 0 to 9, saline injected Days 10 to 19, n=5); bST[10–19] (saline injected Days 0 to 9, 25 mg bST injected Days 10 to 19, n=5); and bST[0–19] (25 mg bST injected Days 0 to 19, n=6). Blood was collected daily for progesterone analysis, and ultrasound examinations were performed daily for measurement of follicles and CL. Compared with the heifers treated with saline, those treated with bST had larger CL and more progesterone during the early (≤ Day 10) and late (Days 15 to 21) phases of the estrous cycle. At mid-cycle (Days 10 to 15), luteal tissue area and progesterone levels were similar for bST- and saline-treated heifers. Ovarian follicular growth was similar for bST- and saline-treated heifers during the first follicular wave. However, during recruitment for the second follicular wave (Days 10 to 14), second largest follicles emerged sooner (P<0.001), the number of Class-3 (≥10 mm) follicles was greater (P<0.01) and largest follicles were smaller (P<0.001) in bST than in saline-treated heifers. Estrous cycle length and ovulation rate were similar for each group. In conclusion, bST increased initial development of the CL and extended its function. Furthermore, the second follicular wave was earlier with bST.

Effect of estradiol valerate on ovarian follicles, emergence of follicular waves and circulating gonadotropins in heifers

An experiment was designed to examine the effect of estradiol valerate (EV) on the growth and regression of follicles of a wave and on the emergence of the next follicular wave. Twenty-six beef heifers were xamined daily by ultrasonography and randomly allocated to 1 of 4 treatment groups at the time of ovulation (Day 0): unterated control heifers and those that received 5 mg EV intramuscularly on Day 1, Day 3 or Day 6. Maximum diameter of the dominant follicle was greater (P<0.05) in control heifers than in heifers treated on Day 1 or Day 3. Mean day of onset of regression of the dominant follicle was later (P<0.05) in control heifers than in heifers treated on Day 1 but was not different from heifers treated on Day 3. In heifers treated on Day 6, cessation of growth, maximum diameter and onset of regression were not different from that of control heifers. The emergence of the next follicular wave was earlier (P<0.05) in heifers treated on Day 1 than in control heifers, whereas wave emergence was delayed (P<0.05) in heifers treated on Day 3 or Day 6. The mean day of maximum concentration of FSH prior to the emergence of the next wave was earlier in heifers treated with EV on Day 1 and later in heifers treated on Day 3 or Day 6 compared with that of the controls (P<0.05). Treatment on Day 1 or Day 3 resulted in a significant LH surge in 8 13 heifers, whereas no LH surges were detected in control heifers or in heifers treated on Day 6. The hypothesis that EV suppresses the growth of the dominant follicle, was supported. Estradiol valerate treatment resulted in early emergence of the next follicular wave in heifers treated on Day 1, but treatment on Day 3 or Day 6 resulted in delayed emergence of the next follicular wave.

A method for characterizing ultrasonically-derived follicular data in heifers

A method was developed for ultrasonically characterizing follicular waves in heifers without the necessity of maintaining day-to-day identities of individual follicles (nonidentity method). Results were compared to a method in which the identities of individual follicles were maintained from day to day (identity method). Data collected daily during 5 estrous cycles were processed by each method, independently, by different operators. The nonidentity method involved grouping and then profiling follicles in order of decreasing diameters without regard to day-to-day identities. The profiling scheme distinguished between follicles of the left versus the right ovary. The dominant and subordinate follicles were readily distinguishable in the nonidentity profiles. When successive dominant follicles developed in the opposite ovary, the follicles were profiled directly. When two successive dominant follicles developed on the same ovary, size information was obscured for a few days where the profiles for each follicle crossed, but continuity of the profiles on each side of the area of ambiguity was maintained. The nonidentity method seemed equivalent to the identity method in determining characteristics of the dominant follicle (e.g., maximal diameter, growth rate, regression rate). Day of emergence of a wave and day of divergence in diameters between dominant and subordinate follicles were readily determined by inspection of the nonidentity profiles. A greater number of subordinate follicles per wave was detected by the nonidentity method due to the inability to individually identify all detected follicles by the identity method. Regression of follicles from a previous wave into the subordinate follicles of a succeeding wave was apparent by either method. The nonidentity method seemed suitable for most needs, was less tedious, and required less skill than the identity method.