AbstractPoly(sucrose methacrylate‐co‐acrylic acid), P(SMA‐co‐AA), and poly(sucrose methacrylate‐co‐diethylene glycol methyl ether methacrylate), P(SMA‐co‐EG2MA), are synthesized by free radical polymerization using sucrose dimethacrylate as a crosslinker. The copolymers present one glass transition suggesting a random distribution of the comonomers. The copolymers–water interaction parameter χ is around 0.5, while Mc increases with SMA molar fraction. The kinetics of water swelling show a Fickian behavior for P(SMA‐co‐AA) richer in acrylic acid. The swelling is driven by the ionic character of the P(SMA‐co‐AA), except at pH = 2, and by the hydrophilicity of the SMA for the P(SMA‐co‐EG2MA). The temperature influences the swelling behavior of the P(SMA‐co‐EG2MA) due to the lower critical solution temperature (LCST) behavior. The pH‐ and thermoresponsiveness of the P(SMA‐co‐AA) and P(SMA‐co‐EG2MA) hydrogels are maintained by replacing the sensitive comonomers with SMA up to mass fractions of 85 and 20 wt%, respectively, ≈71 and 17 wt% of sucrose, a product from a renewable resource. The hydrolytic degradation of the hydrogels is more pronounced for copolymers richer in SMA and resulted in sucrose release. Hydrogels present viscoelastic behavior, and the P(SMA‐co‐AA) series is more resistant to compression. The xerogels of the copolymers richer in SMA show a foam‐like morphology with open cells.
Read full abstract