Most studies on EMC (Event mean concentration) and first flush are reported as local studies; however variations of EMC and first flush across catchments in different climate zones has not been studied. This research collected continuous flow and discrete water quality data and rainfall measurements from 17 catchments, EMC and rainfall data from 14 catchments, and an additional dataset where only average EMC values are reported (19 catchments). The data are from residential sites across temperate, tropical, dry, and continental climate zones and include water quality parameters in particulate (total suspended solids), mixed (total nitrogen and total phosphorus) and dissolved (orthophosphate and ammonium nitrogen) forms. Our study shows that EMC differs significantly between climate zones. The average EMC is highest in dry followed by continental and temperate, with lowest in the tropical zone. Pearson's correlation analysis revealed that the rainfall depth is negatively correlated with EMC for particulate and mixed form parameters for the tropical, temperate and dry zones, but positively correlated for the continental zone. The discrete time-series data from the 17 catchments were used to evaluate first flush and it was found that catchments in the tropics exhibit stronger first flush than temperate zone catchments, for all the water quality parameters with particulate showing a stronger first flush compared to dissolved forms. Based on the distribution of the data, new limits for very strong, strong, moderate, and very weak to no first flush are suggested for TSS for different climate zones. The new limits were quantified by fitting the function L^=V^bwhere L^and V^are the normalized cumulative runoff load and volume, respectively. For catchments in the tropics, this corresponds to b < 0.47, 0.6 > b > 0.47, 0.76 > b > 0.6 and b > 0.76, respectively. For the temperate zone, b < 0.5, 0.67 > b > 0.5, 0.85 > b > 0.67 and b > 0.85, are appropriate. From a design perspective, the FF20 concept defined as the load corresponding to 20% runoff volume, is often used. The ranges FF20 < 0.27, 0.36 > FF20 > 0.27, 0.45 > FF20 > 0.36 and FF20 > 0.45 and FF20 < 0.24, 0.31 > FF20 > 0.24, 0.31 > FF20 > 0.39 and FF20 > 0.39 are proposed for tropical and temperate catchments, respectively. Other limits for TP, TN, OP and NH4-N are also suggested. This is the first study of its kind and an expended dataset especially for continental and dry regions is needed to further validate the findings.
Read full abstract