Abstract Background Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease where accurate assessment of disease activity is essential for patient management. Endoscopy is the gold standard for evaluating mucosal inflammation, but non-invasive alternatives, such as transabdominal ultrasound (TAUS), are garnering interest. This study aimed to evaluate the sensitivity of rectal wall thickness measurement using TAUS to assess UC activity, comparing to endoscopic and histological findings. Methods In a prospective, observational study, we enrolled consecutive adult patients with UC who were referred to our tertiary center from May to October 2024. Eligibility required a scheduled TAUS before 30 days of a staging colonoscopy, without intervening therapy adjustments. Exclusion criteria included technically inadequate TAUS readings (e.g., due to anatomical variations or excessive gas interposition). In all patients we evaluated rectal wall thickness and laboratory parameters such as C-Reactive Protein and fecal calprotectin. Disease activity was assessed by endoscopist (MAYO score). Histological status (active/inactive) and additional clinical data, including disease duration, extent, and UC treatment, were recorded. Results We studied 29 patients (51.7% females, median age 55 years). The median UC duration was 10 years, and most patients had proctitis or left-sided colitis (37.9% each). Patients with an endoscopic MAYO score of 0 or 1 had a median rectal wall thickness of 4.7 mm (IQR 4.5-5.5), while those with a score of 2 or 3 had a median of 7.0 (IQR 5.3-7.4 mm, p=0.005). ROC analysis of TAUS rectal wall thickness revealed significant discriminatory capability for endoscopic activity (AUC: 0.833, CI 95%, 0.678-0.989), while the same figures for fecal calprotectin and C-Reactive Protein were 0.890 (CI 95%, 0.671-1.000) and 0.774 (CI 95%, 0.604-0.944), respectively. For histological activity, accuracy of rectal wall thickness, fecal calprotectin, and C-Reactive Protein were 0.796 (CI 95%, 0.620-0.972), 0.790 (CI 95%, 0.605-0.975), and 0.645 (CI 95%, 0.429-0.861), respectively. Conclusion This preliminary analysis showed that rectal wall thickness measured by TAUS has a high accuracy in identifying both endoscopic and histologic activities in patients with UC, positioning it as a promising tool to avoid endoscopy. Future studies with larger cohorts are needed to confirm these findings and further optimize the use of TAUS in this setting.
Read full abstract