Waitlist Outcomes Research Articles

The Association Of Intra-aortic Balloon Pump Or Impella Duration Of Support With Waitlist And Post-heart Transplant Outcomes

The Association Of Intra-aortic Balloon Pump Or Impella Duration Of Support With Waitlist And Post-heart Transplant Outcomes

(1235) Lung Transplant Waitlist Outcomes Before and after 2021 LAS Revision

(1235) Lung Transplant Waitlist Outcomes Before and after 2021 LAS Revision

(64) Emerging Racial Differences in Heart Transplant Waitlist Outcomes for Patients on Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support

(64) Emerging Racial Differences in Heart Transplant Waitlist Outcomes for Patients on Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support

Heart Waitlist Outcomes Differ Significantly Based On Criteria For Status Two Listing

Heart Waitlist Outcomes Differ Significantly Based On Criteria For Status Two Listing

Association of Body Surface Area With Access to Deceased Donor Liver Transplant and Novel Allocation Policies

Small waitlist candidates are significantly less likely than larger candidates to receive a liver transplant. To investigate the magnitude of the size disparity and test potential policy solutions. A decision analytical model was generated to match liver transplant donors to waitlist candidates based on predefined body surface area (BSA) ratio limits (donor BSA divided by recipient BSA). Participants included adult deceased liver transplant donors and waitlist candidates in the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database from June 18, 2013, to March 20, 2020. Data were analyzed from January 2021 to September 2021. Candidates were categorized into 6 groups according to BSA from smallest (group 1) to largest (group 6). Waitlist outcomes were examined. A match run was created for each donor under the current acuity circle liver allocation policy, and the proportion of candidates eligible for a liver based on BSA ratio was calculated. Novel allocation models were then tested. Time on the waitlist, assigned Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score, and proportion of patients undergoing a transplant were compared by BSA group. Modeling under the current allocation policies was used to determine baseline access to transplant by group. Simulation of novel allocation policies was performed to examine change in access. There were 41 341 donors (24 842 [60.1%] male and 16 499 [39.9%] female) and 84 201 waitlist candidates (53 724 [63.8%] male and 30 477 [36.2%] female) in the study. The median age of the donors was 42 years (IQR, 28-55) and waitlist candidates, 57 years (IQR, 50-63). Females were overrepresented in the 2 smallest BSA groups (7100 [84.0%] and 7922 [61.1%] in groups 1 and 2, respectively). For each increase in group number, waitlist time decreased (234 days [IQR, 48-700] for group 1 vs 179 days [IQR, 26-503] for group 6; P < .001) and the proportion of the group undergoing transplant likewise improved (3890 [46%] in group 1 vs 4932 [57%] in group 6; P < .001). The smallest 2 groups of candidates were disadvantaged under the current acuity circle allocation model, with 37% and 7.4% fewer livers allocated relative to their proportional representation on the waitlist. Allocation of the smallest 10% of donors (by BSA) to the smallest 15% of candidates overcame this disparity, as did performing split liver transplants. In this study, liver waitlist candidates with the smallest BSAs had a disadvantage due to size. Prioritizing allocation of smaller liver donors to smaller candidates may help overcome this disparity.

Effects of the implementation of acuity circle policy on waitlist and post-transplant outcomes of liver re-transplantation.

Acuity circle (AC) policy implementation improved the waitlist outcomes for certain liver transplant (LT)-candidates. The impact of the policy implementation for liver retransplant (reLT) candidates is unknown. Using Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing (OPTN/UNOS) data from January, 2018 to September, 2021, we investigated the effect of the AC policy on waitlist and post-LT outcomes among patients who had previously received a LT. Patients were categorized by relisting date: Pre-AC (Era 1: January 1, 2018-February 3, 2020; n=750); and Post-AC (Era 2: February 4, 2020-June 30, 2021; n=556). Patient and donor characteristics, as well as on-waitlist and post-reLT outcomes were compared across eras. In Era 2, the probability of transplant within 90days overall and among patients relisted>14days from initial transplant (late relisting) were significantly higher compared to Era 1 (subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR] 1.40, 95% CI 1.18-1.64, p<.001; sHR 1.52, 95% CI 1.23-1.88, p=.001, respectively). However, there was no difference by era among patients relisted ≤14days from initial transplant (early relisting; sHR 1.21, 95% CI .93-1.57, p=.15). Likewise, among early relisting patients, risks for 180-day graft loss and mortality were significantly higher in Era 2 versus Era 1 (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 5.77, 95% CI 1.71-19.51, p=.004; and aHR 8.22, 95% CI 1.85-36.59, p=.005, respectively); for late relisting patients, risks for these outcomes were similar across eras. Our results show that the implementation of AC policy has improved transplant rates and reduced waiting time for reLT candidates listed>14days from initial transplant. However, the impact upon early relisting patients may be mixed.

Center expansion of liver transplants using donation after circulatory death organs is associated with reduced overall waitlist mortality.

Waitlist outcomes in liver transplantation (LT) for individual recipients are improved by use of allografts procured through donation after circulatory death (DCD). However, the impact of increased DCD acceptance on overall center outcomes is unknown. Using the United Network for Organ Sharing database, 88 centers performing an average of ≥10 LTs/year between 1/2004 and 12/2019 were compared by percent DCD use quartile and categorized into four phenotypes according to temporal usage trends. Overall center median Model for End-stage Liver Disease at LT (MMaT), waitlist mortality, and waiting time were evaluated. The overall DCD rate was 6.1% (N=4906/80,709), ranging from 0% to 25.5%. Centers in the top DCD use quartile had lower MMaT (24 vs. 26; p<.001) and shorter overall waiting times (median 66 days vs. 90 days; p<.001) compared to bottom quartile centers. MMaT increased less over time at centers with increasing DCD use and was lower than at centers with declining DCD use (27 vs. 32; p=.017). Overall waitlist mortality between 2016 and 2019 was lower at increasing DCD use centers (17.8% vs. 22.5%, p=.034), yet did not affect 1-year mortality (p=.747). The improved waitlist outcomes at centers with expanded DCD use extend beyond DCD recipients alone without negative consequences to overall post-LT center metrics.

Practical application of the French two-score heart allocation scheme: Insights from a high-volume heart transplantation centre

BackgroundIn 2018, a cardiac allocation scheme based on an individual score considering the risk of death both on the waitlist and after heart transplantation was implemented in France. AimsTo analyse the practical application of the pre- and post-transplant risk score in a French high-volume heart transplantation centre. MethodsAll consecutive adult patients listed for a first non-combined heart transplantation between 02 January 2018 and 30 June 2022 at our centre were included. Baseline characteristics of candidates and recipients were retrieved from the national CRISTAL registry. Both scores were calculated at listing and at transplant. ResultsOverall, 364 patients were included. During follow-up, 257 patients (70.6%) were transplanted, and 57 (15.6%) died or were removed from the waitlist. Post-transplant 3-month survival was 84.8%. Total bilirubin and natriuretic peptides had the most important weight in the pretransplant risk score. This score had a major impact on waitlist outcomes: quartile 1 was characterized by low access to heart transplantation (58.2%) and risk of death on the waitlist (9.9%) compared with quartile 4 (heart transplantation rate 74.1%, mortality on the waiting list>20%). According to the post-transplant risk score, a minimal number of candidates were considered ineligible for heart transplantation (<1%), but 12.4% were contraindicated to at least one donor category. The number of contraindicated donor categories had a significant impact on waitlist outcomes. Although adequately calibrated, the post-transplant score had a limited discrimination (area under the curve 0.65, 95% confidence interval 0.59–0.71). ConclusionOur results highlight the major impact of pre- and post-transplantation risk scores on waitlist outcomes following the allocation scheme update.

Disparate Intent-to-Treat Outcomes for Pediatric Liver Transplantation Based on Indication.

The impact of indication for pediatric liver transplantation on waitlist and post-transplant mortality outcomes is well known, but the impact on intent-to-treat outcomes has not been investigated. Intent-to-treat survival analysis is important in this study because it is more comprehensive, combining the transplant outcomes of waitlist mortality, post-transplant mortality, and transplant rate into a single metric to elucidate any disparities in outcomes based on indication. Cox regression was used to analyze factors impacting survival in 8,002 children listed for liver transplant in the UNOS database between 2006 and 2016. The Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to assess differences in waitlist, post-transplant, and intent-to-treat mortality among the top 5 indications of biliary atresia, acute hepatic necrosis, metabolic disorders, hepatoblastoma, and autoimmune cirrhosis. When compared to the reference group of biliary atresia, multivariate analyses showed that every indication was associated with inferior intent-to-treat outcomes except for metabolic disorders. Hepatoblastoma (hazard ratio (HR): 3.73), autoimmune cirrhosis (HR: 1.86), and AHN (HR: 1.77) were associated with significantly increased intent-to-treat mortality. Hepatoblastoma was also associated with increased post-transplant mortality (HR: 3.77) and was the only indication significantly associated with increased waitlist mortality (HR: 6.43). Significant disparity exists across all indications with respect to an increased intent-to-treat mortality, along with an increased post-transplant and waitlist mortality, when compared to the biliary atresia reference group. If further studies validate these findings, a reexamination of the equitable distribution of allografts for transplant may be warranted as well as a focus on disparities in survival after transplant.

Impact of donation after circulatory death heart transplantation on waitlist outcomes and transplantation activity.

Donation after circulatory death (DCD) heart transplantation has been shown to have comparable outcomes to transplantation using brain death donors (DBDs). This study evaluates the impact of this alternative source of allografts on waitlist mortality and transplant volume. We compared waitlist mortality and transplant rates in patients who were registered before (2019 period) and after we adopted DCD heart transplantation (2021 period). We identified 111 patients who were on the waiting list in 2019 and 77 patients who were registered during 2021. Total number of donor organ offers received in 2019 was 385 (178 unique donors) versus 3450 (1145 unique donors) in 2021. More than 40% of all donors in 2021 were DCDs. Waitlist mortality was comparable for patients in 2019 and 2021 (18/100 person-years in 2019 vs. 26/100 person-years in 2021, p=.49). The transplant rate was 67/100 person-years in 2019 versus 207/100 person-years in 2021 (p<.001). After adjusting for acuity status, gender, blood type, and weight, patients listed in 2021 had 2.08 times greater chance of transplantation compared to patients listed in 2019 (HR 2.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.26-3.45, p=.004). Use of DCD donor hearts significantly increased heart transplant rate in our institution.

Functional status predicts pediatric heart transplant outcomes: A united network for organ sharing (UNOS) database study

Functional status predicts waitlist survival in adult heart transplantation and is an independent predictor of outcomes in pediatric liver transplantation. This has not been studied in pediatric heart transplantation. Study aims were to determine the association of: (1) functional status at listing with waitlist and post-transplant outcomes, and (2) functional status at transplant with post-transplant outcomes in pediatric heart transplantation. Retrospective United Network of Organ Sharing database study of pediatric patients listed for heart transplant between 2005 and 2019 with Lansky Play Performance Scale (LPPS) scores at listing. Standard statistical methods were used to assess relationships between LPPS and outcomes (waitlist and post-transplant). Negative waitlist outcome was defined as death or removal from waitlist due to clinical deterioration. There were 4,169 patients identified, including 1,080 with LPPS 80-100 (normal activity), 1,603 with LPPS 50-70 (mild limitations), and 1,486 with LPPS 10-40 (severe limitations). LPPS 10-40 correlated with negative waitlist outcomes (HR 1.69, CI 1.59-1.80, p < 0.0001). While LLPS at listing had no association with post-transplant survival, those with LPPS 10-40 at transplant had inferior 1-year post-transplant survival compared to those with LPPS ≥50 (92% vs 95%-96%, p=0.0011). Functional status was an independent predictor of post-transplant outcomes in patients with cardiomyopathy. A functional improvement of ≥20 points between listing and transplant (N=770, 24%) was associated with higher 1-year post-transplant survival (HR 1.63, 95% CI: 1.10-2.41, p=0.018). Functional status is associated with waitlist and post-transplant outcomes. Interventions targeting functional impairment may improve pediatric heart transplantation outcomes.

Greater geographic sharing and heart transplantation waitlist outcomes following the 2018 heart allocation policy

In 2018, a new heart allocation policy was introduced to reduce variability in access to and outcomes after transplantation, in part, through attempts at broader geographic sharing of donor hearts. We evaluated how this policy affected geographic sharing and waitlist outcomes by donation service area (DSA). This retrospective study of the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database included adult patients waitlisted between October 2016 and October 2020, stratified by policy period. Our primary outcomes were mean proportion of imported and exported hearts aggregated by DSA as well as time to transplant. Following the policy change, there was substantial evidence of sharing across DSAs. The mean proportion of imported hearts transplanted by a DSA increased from 32% (95% CI: 27%-36%) to 74% (95% CI: 71%-78%; p < 0.001), and the mean proportion of exported hearts increased from 37% (95% CI: 33%-42%) to 75% (95% CI: 71%-79%; p < 0.001). The mean sharing ratio, defined as the log-transformed ratio of imported to exported hearts per DSA, shifted from 1.15 (95% CI: 0.88-1.42) to 1.02 (95% CI: 0.96-1.07), with a 76% decline in the variance across DSAs. As sharing increased, time to transplant per DSA declined from 153.9 days (95% CI, 143.4-164.4 days) pre-policy to 89.6 days (95% CI, 83.1-96.1 days) post-policy (p < 0.001). A larger decrease in waitlist time was associated with a higher proportion of exported hearts. The 2018 heart allocation policy was associated with more uniform access to heart transplantation and improved waitlist outcomes.

Lung Transplantation Waitlist Mortality Among Sarcoidosis Patients by Lung Allocation Score Grouping

The Lung Allocation Score (LAS) system was designed to equalize and minimize waitlist mortality among candidiates for lung transplantation. The LAS stratifies sarcoidosis patients by mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) into group A (mPAP ≤30 mm Hg) and group D (mPAP >30 mm Hg). In this study, we aimed to analyze the effect of diagnostic grouping and patient characteristics on waitlist mortality among sarcoidosis patients. This was a retrospective review of sarcoidosis lung transplantation candidates since LAS implementation in May 2005 through May 2019 in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database. We compared baseline characteristics, LAS variables, and waitlist outcomes between sarcoidosis groups A and D. We performed Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and multivariable regression to determine associations with waitlist mortality. We identified 1027 sarcoidosis candidates since LAS implementation. Of these, 385 had mPAP ≤30 mm Hg and 642 had mPAP >30 mm Hg. Waitlist mortality was 18% in sarcoidosis group D and 14% in sarcoidosis group A. Kaplan-Meier curve showed lower waitlist survival probability for sarcoidosis group D than group A (log-rank P=.0049). Functional status, oxygen requirement, and sarcoidosis group D were associated with increased waitlist mortality. Cardiac output ≥4 L/min was associated with decreased waitlist mortality. Sarcoidosis group D had lower waitlist survival than group A. Decreased survival appears driven by mPAP; sarcoidosis group D, functional status, oxygen requirement, and cardiac output had significant associations with waitlist mortality. These findings suggest that the current LAS grouping does not adequately reflect the risk for waitlist mortality among sarcoidosis group D patients.

Center use of technical variant grafts varies widely and impacts pediatric liver transplant waitlist and recipient outcomes in the United States.

To assess the impact of technical variant grafts (TVGs) [including living donor (LD) and deceased donor split/partial grafts] on waitlist (WL) and transplant outcomes for pediatric liver transplant (LT) candidates, we performed a retrospective analysis of Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) data on first-time LT or liver-kidney pediatric candidates listed at centers that performed >10 LTs during the study period, 2004-2020. Center variance was plotted for LT volume, TVG usage, and survival. A composite center metric of TVG usage and WL mortality was developed to demonstrate the existing variation and potential for improvement. Sixty-four centers performed 7842 LTs; 657 children died on the WL. Proportions of WL mortality by center ranged from 0% to 31% and those of TVG usage from 0% to 76%. Higher TVG usage, from deceased donor or LD, independently or in combination, significantly correlated with lower WL mortality. In multivariable analyses, death from listing was significantly lower with increased center TVG usage (HR = 0.611, CI: 0.40-0.92) and LT volume (HR = 0.995, CI: 0.99-1.0). Recipients of LD transplants (HR = 0.637, CI: 0.51-0.79) had significantly increased survival from transplant compared with other graft types, and recipients of deceased donor TVGs (HR = 1.066, CI: 0.93-1.22) had statistically similar outcomes compared with whole graft recipients. Increased TVG utilization may decrease WL mortality in the US. Hence, policy and training to increase TVG usage, availability, and expertise are critical.

Reexamining the Impact of Insurance Type on Kidney Transplant Waitlist Status and Posttransplantation Outcomes in the United States After Implementation of the Affordable Care Act.

Using Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data, we assessed insurance type of waitlisted candidates pre- (2008-2014) versus post- (2014-2021) KAS/ACA using chi-square tests. Next, we performed a competing risk analysis to study the effect of private versus public (Medicare, Medicaid, or government-sponsored) insurance on waitlist outcomes and a Cox survival analysis to study posttransplant outcomes while controlling for candidate, and recipient and donor variables, respectively. The proportion of overall KT candidates insured by Medicaid increased from pre-KAS/ACA to post-KAS/ACA (from 12 667 [7.3%] to 21 768 [8.8%], P < 0.0001). However, KT candidates with public insurance were more likely to have died or become too sick for KT (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR] = 1.33, confidence interval [CI], 1.30-1.36) or to receive a deceased donor KT (SHR = 1.57, CI, 1.54-1.60) but less likely to receive a living donor KT (SHR = 0.87, CI, 0.85-0.89). Post-KT, KT recipients with public insurance had greater risk of mortality (relative risks = 1.22, CI, 1.15-1.31) and allograft failure (relative risks = 1.10, CI, 1.03-1.29). Although the implementation of ACA marginally increased the proportion of waitlisted candidates with Medicaid, publicly insured KT candidates remained at greater risk of being removed from the waitlist, had lower probability of living donor kidney transplantation, and had greater probability of dying post-KT and allograft failure. Concerted efforts to address factors contributing to these inequities in future studies are needed, with the goal of achieving equity in KT for all.

Prioritizing the Sickest Among the Sickest: A Matter of Tact and Moderation, but the Game Is Worth the Candle.

Prioritizing the Sickest Among the Sickest: A Matter of Tact and Moderation, but the Game Is Worth the Candle.

Waitlist mortality in pediatric liver transplantation: The goal is zero.

Waitlist mortality in pediatric liver transplantation: The goal is zero.

Waitlist and posttransplantation outcomes of lean individuals with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Lean individuals with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) represent a subset of patients with a distinct risk factor profile. We assessed the association between body mass index (BMI) on waitlist and postliver transplantation (LT) outcomes among these patients. We retrospectively analyzed the United Network for Organ Sharing data, including adult patients with NAFLD listed for LT between February 27, 2002, and June 30, 2020. We first used competing risk analyses to estimate the association of BMI with waitlist removal due to death or clinical deterioration. We then conducted Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox regression models to determine the impact of weight change during the waiting list on all-cause mortality and graft failure after LT. Patients with normal weight (BMI 18.5-24.9 kg/m 2 ) suffered higher waitlist removal (adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio 1.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.10-1.43; p =0.001) compared with patients with obesity class I (BMI 30-34.9 kg/m 2 ). Those who remained at normal weight had higher all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.61, 95% CI 1.32-1.96; p <0.001) and graft failure (aHR 1.57, 95% CI 1.32-1.88; p <0.001) than patients with stable obesity. Among patients with normal weight, those with the greatest weight increase (BMI gain ≥3 kg/m 2 ) had lower all-cause mortality (aHR 0.55, 95% CI 0.33-0.93; p =0.03) and graft failure (aHR 0.49, 95% CI 0.30-0.81; p =0.01) compared with patients with stable weight (BMI change ≤1 kg/m 2 ). Patients with NAFLD with normal weight have increased waitlist removal and those who remained at normal weight during the waitlist period have worse posttransplantation outcomes. Identifying and addressing factors influencing apparent healthy weight prior to LT are crucial to mitigate poor outcomes.

Rapid desensitization through immunoadsorption during cardiopulmonary bypass. A novel method to facilitate human leukocyte antigen incompatible heart transplantation.

Anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-antibody production represents a major barrier to heart transplantation, limiting recipient compatibility with potential donors and increasing the risk of complications with poor waiting-list outcomes. Currently there is no consensus to when desensitization should take place, and through what mechanism, meaning that sensitized patients must wait for a compatible donor for many months, if not years. We aimed to determine if intraoperative immunoadsorption could provide a potential desensitization methodology. Anti-HLA antibody-containing whole blood was added to a Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) circuit set up to mimic a 20kg patient undergoing heart transplantation. Plasma was separated and diverted to a standalone, secondary immunoadsorption system, with antibody-depleted plasma returned to the CPB circuit. Samples for anti-HLA antibody definition were taken at baseline, when combined with the CPB prime (on bypass), and then every 20min for the duration of treatment (total 180min). A reduction in individual allele median fluorescence intensity (MFI) to below clinically relevant levels (<1000 MFI), and in the majority of cases below the lower positive detection limit (<500 MFI), even in alleles with a baseline MFI >4000 was demonstrated. Reduction occurred in all cases within 120min, demonstrating efficacy in a time period usual for heart transplantation. Flowcytometric crossmatching of suitable pseudo-donor lymphocytes demonstrated a change from T cell and B cell positive channel shifts to negative, demonstrating a reduction in binding capacity. Intraoperative immunoadsorption in an ex vivo setting demonstrates clinically relevant reductions in anti-HLA antibodies within the normal timeframe for heart transplantation. This method represents a potential desensitization technique that could enable sensitized children to accept a donor organ earlier, even in the presence of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies.

Lung Transplantation for Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia

Patients with bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) have poor respiratory trajectories and are at increased risk of lung function decline with age. Lung transplant (LTx) is a possible treatment option for this growing patient population, but little has been published on LTx in this patient group. What are the characteristics of patients with BPD who are listed for LTx? How do waitlist and post-LTx outcomes for BPD compare with LTx for other diagnoses? The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) registry was queried for patients of all ages listed for or who underwent LTx (2000-2020). Descriptive analysis, waitlist outcomes, and post-LTx survival at 1, 5, and 10 years were assessed comparing patients with BPD vsLTx patients with other diagnoses. Post-LTx survival for patients with BPD born in the pre-surfactant era (pre-SE, before 1990) and those born in the post-surfactant era (post-SE) was compared. Propensity score matching was performed to control for the risk factors and match patients with BPD with other LTx patients on a 1:1 ratio. BPD was reported in 65 patients, of whom 32 (49.2%) underwent LTx. Patients with BPD at listing were younger than those with other diagnoses (median age, 21 [interquartile range, 5-31] years vs57 [45-63] years; P< .001), and more were likely to receive mechanical ventilation at listing (23%vs3.7%; P< .001). Patients with BPD had an FEV1 of 17%compared with 34%predicted in other patients (P= .002). Patients with BPD had an overall similar post-LTx survival compared with patients with other diagnoses (P= .106), even following propensity score matching (P= .41). LTx for BPD has increased over the last 20 years. Patients with BPD have similar post-LTx outcomes compared with those of other patient populations in the modern era. Thus, LTx could be considered for patients with BPD experiencing progressive respiratory deterioration.