Waitlist Mortality Research Articles

Outpatient mean arterial pressure: A potentially modifiable risk for acute kidney injury and death among patients with cirrhosis.

Mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), which decreases as portal hypertension progresses, may be a modifiable risk factor among patients with cirrhosis. We included adults enrolled in the Functional Assessment in Liver Transplantation study. We completed latent class trajectory analyses to define MAP trajectories. We completed time-dependent Cox-regression analyses to test the association between outpatient MAP and 3 cirrhosis-related outcomes: (1) stage 2 acute kidney injury (AKI), defined as a ≥200% increase in serum creatinine from baseline; (2) a 5-point increase in the MELD-Na score, defined as the incidence of increase from initial MELD-Na; (3) waitlist mortality, defined as death on the waitlist. For each outcome, we defined MAP cut points by determining the maximally selected Log-rank statistic after univariable Cox-regression analyses. Among the 1786 patients included in this analysis, our latent class trajectory analyses identified 3 specific outpatient MAP trajectories: "stable-low," "stable-high," and "increasing-to-decreasing." However, >80% of patients were in a "stable-low" trajectory. We found in adjusted analyses that outpatient MAP was associated with each of our outcomes: Stage 2 AKI (adjusted hazard ratio 0.88 per 10mmHg increase in MAP [95% CI: 0.79-0.99]); 5-point increase in MELD-Na (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.91 [95% CI: 0.86-0.96]; waitlist mortality (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.89 [95% CI: 0.81-0.96]). For each outcome, we found that an outpatient MAP of 82mmHg was most associated with outcomes ( p <0.05 for all). Our study informs the association between outpatient MAP and cirrhosis-related outcomes. These findings, coupled with the identification of specific thresholds, lay the foundation for the trial of targeted outpatient MAP modulation in patients with cirrhosis.

Outcomes following concomitant multiorgan heart transplantation from circulatory death donors: The United States experience

BackgroundDonation after circulatory death (DCD) has reemerged as a method of expanding the donor heart pool. Given the high waitlist mortality of multiorgan heart candidates, we evaluated waitlist outcomes associated with willingness to consider DCD offers and post-transplant outcomes following DCD transplant for these candidates. MethodsUsing the United Network for Organ Sharing database, we identified adult multiorgan heart candidates and recipients between 1/1/2020 and 3/31/2023. Among candidates that met inclusion criteria, we compared the cumulative incidence of transplant, with waitlist death/deterioration as a competing risk, by willingness to consider DCD offers. Among recipients of DCD vs. brain death (DBD) transplants, we compared perioperative outcomes and post-transplant survival. ResultsOf 1,802 heart-kidney, 266 heart-liver, and 440 heart-lung candidates, 15.8%, 12.4% and 31.1%, respectively, were willing to consider DCD offers. On adjusted analysis, willingness to consider DCD offers was associated with higher likelihood of transplant for all multiorgan heart candidates and decreased likelihood of waitlist deterioration for heart-lung candidates. Of 1,100 heart-kidney, 173 heart-liver, and 159 heart-lung recipients, 5.4%, 2.3%, and 2.5%, respectively, received DCD organs. Recipients of DCD and DBD heart-kidney transplants had similar likelihood of perioperative outcomes and 1-year survival. All other DCD multiorgan heart recipients have survived to last follow-up. ConclusionsMultiorgan heart candidates who were willing to consider DCD offers had favorable waitlist outcomes, and heart-kidney recipients of DCD transplants had similar post-transplant outcomes to recipients of DBD transplants. We recommend the use of DCD organs to increase the donor pool for these high-risk candidates.

Pre-operative assessment of living liver donors' liver anatomy and volumes.

Decades of experience supports LDLT as a favorable strategy to reduce waitlist mortality. The multiple regenerative pathways of hepatocytes and other hepatic cells justify the rationale behind it. Nonetheless, living liver donation is still underused and its broader implementation is challenging, mostly due to variability in practices leading to concerns related to donor safety. A non-systematic literature search was conducted for peer-reviewed original articles related to pre-operative evaluation of living liver donor candidates. Eligible studies were synthesized upon consensus for discussion in this up-to-date review. Review of the literature demonstrate that the importance of preoperative assessment of vascular, biliary and liver volume to ensure donor safety and adequate surgical planning for graft procurement is widely recognized. Moreover, data indicates that anatomic variants in vascular and biliary systems in healthy donors are common, present in up to 50% of the population. Therefore, comprehensive mapping and visualizations of each component is needed. Different imaging modalities are reported across practices and are discussed in detail. Lastly, assessment of liver volume must take into account several technical and donor factors that increase the chances of errors in volume estimation, which occurs in up to 10% of the cases. Experience suggests that maximizing donor safety and lessening their risks is a result of integrated experience between hepatobiliary and transplant surgery, along with multidisciplinary efforts in performing a comprehensive pre-operative donor assessment. Although technical advances have increased the accuracy of volume estimation, over- or under-estimation remains a challenge that needs further attention.

Validation of a novel donor lung scoring system based on the updated lung Composite Allocation Score

Lung transplantation (LTx) continues to have lower rates of long-term graft survival compared with other organs. Additionally, lung utilization rates from brain-dead donors remain substantially lower compared with other solid organs, despite a growing need for LTx and the significant risk of waitlist mortality. This study aims to examine the effects of using a combination of the recently described novel lung donor (LUNDON) acceptability score and the newly adopted recipient lung Composite Allocation Score (CAS) to guide transplantation. We performed a review of nearly 18 000 adult primary lung transplants from 2015-2022 across the US with retroactive calculations of the CAS value. The medium-CAS group (29.6-34.5) had superior 1-year posttransplant survival. Importantly, the combination of high-CAS (> 34.5) recipients with low LUNDON score (≤ 40) donors had the worst survival at 1 year compared with any other combination. Additionally, we constructed a model that predicts 1-year and 3-year survival using the LUNDON acceptability score and CAS values. These results suggest that caution should be exercised when using marginally acceptable donor lungs in high-priority recipients. The use of the LUNDON score with CAS value can potentially guide clinical decision-making for optimal donor-recipient matches for LTx.

Transplant benefit-based offering of deceased donor livers in the United Kingdom

The National Liver Offering Scheme (NLOS) was introduced in the UK in 2018 to offer livers from deceased donors to patients on the national waiting list based, for most patients, on calculated transplant benefit. Before NLOS, livers were offered to transplant centres by geographic donor zones and, within centres, by estimated recipient need for a transplant. UK Transplant Registry data on patient registrations and transplants were analysed to build statistical models for survival on the list (M1) and survival post-transplantation (M2). A separate cohort of registrations - not seen by the models before - was analysed to simulate what liver allocation would have been under M1, M2 and a transplant benefit score (TBS) model (combining both M1 and M2), and to compare these allocations to what had been recorded in the UK Transplant Registry. The number of deaths on the waiting list and patient life years were used to compare the different simulation scenarios and to select the optimal allocation model. Registry data were monitored, pre- and post-NLOS, to understand the performance of the scheme. The TBS was identified as the optimal model to offer donation after brain death (DBD) livers to adult and large paediatric elective recipients. In the first 2 years of NLOS, 68% of DBD livers were offered using the TBS to this type of recipient. Monitoring data indicate that mortality on the waiting list post-NLOS significantly decreased compared with pre-NLOS (p <0.0001), and that patient survival post-listing was significantly greater post- compared to pre-NLOS (p= 0.005). In the first two years of NLOS offering, waiting list mortality fell while post-transplant survival was not negatively impacted, delivering on the scheme's objectives. The National Liver Offering Scheme (NLOS) was introduced in the UK in 2018 to increase transparency of the deceased donor liver offering process, maximise the overall survival of the waiting list population, and improve equity of access to liver transplantation. To our knowledge, it is the first scheme that offers organs based on statistical prediction of transplant benefit: the transplant benefit score. The results are important to the transplant community - from healthcare practitioners to patients - and demonstrate that, in the first two years of NLOS offering, waiting list mortality fell while post-transplant survival was not negatively impacted, thus delivering on the scheme's objectives. The scheme continues to be monitored to ensure that the transplant benefit score remains up-to-date and that signals that suggest the possible disadvantage of some patients are investigated.

Two single lung transplantations from one donor: lung twinning in the LAS era.

The implementation of the Lung Allocation Score (LAS) in the Eurotransplant international collaborative framework decreased waiting list mortality, but organ shortage remains a significant problem. Transplantation of two single lungs from one donor into two recipients (lung twinning) may decrease waiting list mortality. We sought to analyze if this strategy can lead to an acceptable intermediate-term outcome. Since the LAS-implementation we performed 32 paired single-lung transplantations from 16 postmortal donors. Data and outcome were analyzed retrospectively comparing recipients receiving the first lung (first twins) with recipients receiving the second lung (second twins), left versus right transplantation and restrictive versus obstructive disease. Survival at one year was 81% and 54% at five years. Veno-venous ECMO had been successfully used as bridge-to-transplant in three patients with ECMO-explantation immediately after surgery. Bronchial anastomotic complications were not observed in any patient. First twins and second twins exhibited similar survival (p = 0.82) despite higher LAS in first twins (median 45 versus 34, p < 0.001) and longer cold ischemic time in second twins (280 ± 83 vs. 478 ± 125min, p < 0.001). Survival of left and right transplantation was similar (p = 0.45) with similar best post-transplant FEV1 (68 ± 15% versus 62 ± 14%, p = 0.26). Survival was similar in restrictive and obstructive disease (p = 0.28) with better post-transplant FEV1 (70 ± 15% versus 57 ± 11%, p = 0.02) in restrictive disease. Performing two single-lung transplantations from one donor can be performed safely with encouraging intermediate-term outcome and good functional capacity. Lung twinning maximizes the donor pool and may help to overcome severe organ shortage. This research is not a clinical trial. Thus no registration details will be provided.

Impact of new allocation policy on waitlist and transplant outcomes of adult congenital heart patients supported with ECMO.

The use of ECMO as a bridge to heart transplantation has been growing rapidly in all heart transplant recipients since the implementation of the new UNOS allocation policy; however, the impact on adult congenital heart disease (ACHD) patients is not known. We analyzed the UNOS data (2015-2021) for ACHD patients supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) during the waitlist, before and after October 2018, to assess the impact on the waitlist and posttransplant outcomes. We compared the characteristics and outcomes of ACHD patients with or without ECMO use during the waitlist and pre- and postpolicy changes. A total of 23 821 patients underwent heart transplantation, and only 918 (4%) had ACHD. Out of all ACHD patients undergoing heart transplants, 6% of patients in the prepolicy era and 7.6% in the postpolicy era were on ECMO at the time of listing. Those on ECMO were younger and sicker compared to the rest of the ACHD cohort. Those on ECMO had similar profiles pre- and postpolicy change; however, there was a very significant decrease in the waitlist time [136 days (IQR 29-384) vs. 38 days (IQR 11-108), p = 0.01]. There was no difference in waitlist mortality; however, competing risk analyses showed a higher likelihood of transplantation (51% vs. 29%) and a lower likelihood of death or deterioration (31% vs. 42%) postpolicy change. Long-term outcomes posttransplant for those supported with ECMO compared to the non-ECMO cohort are similar for ACHD patients, although there was higher attrition in the first year for the ECMO cohort. The new allocation policy has resulted in shorter waitlist times and a higher likelihood of transplantation for ACHD patients supported by ECMO. However, the appropriate use of ECMO and the underuse of durable circulatory support devices in this population need further exploration.

Hyponatremia in the Context of Liver Disease.

Hyponatremia is common in patients with liver disease and is associated with increased mortality, morbidity, and a reduced quality of life. In liver transplantation, the inclusion of hyponatremia in organ allocation scores has reduced waitlist mortality. Portal hypertension and the resulting lowering of the effective arterial blood volume are important pathogenetic factors, but in most patients with liver disease, hyponatremia is multifactorial. Treatment requires a multifaceted approach that tries to reduce electrolyte-free water intake, restore urinary dilution, and increase nonelectrolyte solute excretion. Albumin therapy for hyponatremia is a peculiarity of advanced liver disease. Its use appears to be increasing, while the vaptans are currently only given in selected cases. Osmotic demyelination is a special concern in patients with liver disease. Serial checks of serum sodium concentrations and urine volume monitoring are mandatory.

Revising model for end-stage liver disease from calendar-time cross-sections with correction for selection bias

BackgroundEurotransplant liver transplant candidates are prioritized by Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD), a 90-day waitlist survival risk score based on the INR, creatinine and bilirubin. Several studies revised the original MELD score, UNOS-MELD, with transplant candidate data by modelling 90-day waitlist mortality from waitlist registration, censoring patients at delisting or transplantation. This approach ignores biomarkers reported after registration, and ignores informative censoring by transplantation and delisting.MethodsWe study how MELD revision is affected by revision from calendar-time cross-sections and correction for informative censoring with inverse probability censoring weighting (IPCW). For this, we revised UNOS-MELD on patients with chronic liver cirrhosis on the Eurotransplant waitlist between 2007 and 2019 (n = 13,274) with Cox models with as endpoints 90-day survival (a) from registration and (b) from weekly drawn calendar-time cross-sections. We refer to the revised score from cross-section with IPCW as DynReMELD, and compare DynReMELD to UNOS-MELD and ReMELD, a prior revision of UNOS-MELD for Eurotransplant, in geographical validation.ResultsRevising MELD from calendar-time cross-sections leads to significantly different MELD coefficients. IPCW increases estimates of absolute 90-day waitlist mortality risks by approximately 10 percentage points. DynReMELD has improved discrimination over UNOS-MELD (delta c-index: 0.0040, p < 0.001) and ReMELD (delta c-index: 0.0015, p < 0.01), with differences comparable in magnitude to the addition of an extra biomarker to MELD (delta c-index: ± 0.0030).ConclusionCorrecting for selection bias by transplantation/delisting does not improve discrimination of revised MELD scores, but substantially increases estimated absolute 90-day mortality risks. Revision from cross-section uses waitlist data more efficiently, and improves discrimination compared to revision of MELD exclusively based on information available at listing.

Smart match: revolutionizing organ allocation through artificial intelligence.

In this transformative era of organ transplantation, integrating Smart Match and artificial intelligence (AI) emerges as a pivotal advancement, revolutionizing organ allocation processes. Smart Match employs AI algorithms, enhancing organ matching precision and optimizing transplantation outcomes. Leveraging machine learning addresses complexities in donor-recipient pairing, immunosuppression management, and post-operative care, promising to minimize waitlist mortality and improve patient wellbeing. The multifaceted potential of Smart Match lies in its ability to not only streamline current practices but also pave the way for future innovations in solid organ transplantation. As technology continues to evolve, the collaboration between Smart Match and AI exemplifies a beacon of progress, promising increased efficiency, equitable organ distribution, and improved patient care. This article delves into the paradigm shift facilitated by Smart Match and AI, emphasizing their transformative impact on the landscape of organ allocation and patient outcomes.

Improved Waitlist Outcomes in Liver Transplant Patients With Mid-MELD-Na Scores Listed in Centers Receptive to Use of Organs Donated After Circulatory Death.

Liver transplant (LT) using organs donated after circulatory death (DCD) has been increasing in the United States. We investigated whether transplant centers' receptiveness to use of DCD organs impacted patient outcomes. Transplant centers were classified as very receptive (group 1), receptive (2), or less receptive (3) based on the DCD acceptance rate and DCD transplant percentage. Using organ procurement and transplantation network/UNOS registry data for 20 435 patients listed for LT from January 2020 to June 2022, we compared rates of 1-y transplant probability and waitlist mortality between groups, broken down by model for end-stage liver disease-sodium (MELD-Na) categories. In adjusted analyses, patients in group 1 centers with MELD-Na scores 6 to 29 were significantly more likely to undergo transplant than those in group 3 (aHR range 1.51-2.11, P < 0.001). Results were similar in comparisons between groups 1 and 2 (aHR range 1.41-1.81, P < 0.001) and between groups 2 and 3 with MELD-Na 15-24 (aHR 1.19-1.20, P < 0.007). Likewise, patients with MELD-Na score 20 to 29 in group 1 centers had lower waitlist mortality than those in group 3 (scores, 20-24: aHR, 0.71, P = 0.03; score, 25-29: aHR, 0.51, P < 0.001); those in group 1 also had lower waitlist mortality compared with group 2 (scores 20-24: aHR0.69, P = 0.02; scores 25-29: aHR 0.63, P = 0.03). One-year posttransplant survival of DCD LT patients did not vary significantly compared with donation after brain dead. We conclude that transplant centers' use of DCD livers can improve waitlist outcomes, particularly among mid-MELD-Na patients.

The impact of socioeconomic deprivation on liver transplantation.

Despite global expansion, social disparities impact all phases of liver transplantation, from patient referral to post-transplant care. In pediatric populations, socioeconomic deprivation is associated with delayed referral, higher waitlist mortality, and reduced access to living donor transplantation. Children from socially deprived communities are twice as much less adherent to immunosuppression and have up to a 32% increased incidence of graft failure. Similarly, adult patients from deprived areas and racial minorities have a higher risk of not initiating the transplant evaluation, lower rates of waitlisting, and a 6% higher risk of not being transplanted. Social deprivation is racially segregated, and Black recipients have an increased risk of post-transplant mortality by up to 21%. The mechanisms linking social deprivation to inferior outcomes are not entirely elucidated, and powered studies are still lacking. We offer a review of the most recent evidence linking social deprivation and post-liver transplant outcomes in pediatric and adult populations, as well as a literature-derived theoretical background model for future research on this topic.

Impact of a positive crossmatch on pediatric heart transplant outcomes

BackgroundPediatric heart transplant (HT) candidates experience high waitlist mortality due to a limited donor pool that is constrained in part by anti-HLA sensitization. We evaluated the impact of CDC and Flow donor-specific crossmatch (XM) results on pediatric HT outcomes. MethodsAll pediatric HT between 1999 and 2019 in the OPTN database were included. Donor-specific XM results were sub-categorized based on CDC and Flow results. Primary outcomes were treated rejection in the first year and time to death or allograft loss. Propensity scores were utilized to adjust for differences in baseline characteristics. ResultsA total of 4695 pediatric HT patients with T-cell XM data were included. After propensity score adjustment, a positive T-cell CDC-XM was associated with two times higher odds of treated rejection (OR 2.29 (1.56,3.37)) and shorter time to death/allograft loss (HR 1.50 (1.19,1.88)) compared to a negative Flow-XM. HT recipients who were Flow-XM positive with negative/unknown CDC-XM did not have higher odds of rejection or shorter time to death/allograft loss. An isolated positive B-cell XM was also not associated with worse outcomes. Over the study period XM testing shifted from CDC- to Flow-based assays. ConclusionsA positive donor-specific T-cell CDC-XM was associated with rejection and death/allograft loss following pediatric HT. This association was not observed with a positive T-cell Flow-XM or B-cell XM result alone. The shift away from performing the CDC-XM may result in loss of important prognostic information unless the clinical relevance of quantitative Flow-XM results on heart transplant outcomes is systematically studied.

Using Photovoice to Explore the Lived Environment and Experience of Older Adults with Frailty on their Kidney Transplant Journey.

Older adults with frailty and kidney failure face higher waitlist mortality and are more likely to be listed as inactive on the kidney transplant (KT) wait list. Photovoice is a qualitative participatory research method where participants use photographs to represent their environment, needs and experiences. It offers unique insight into the lived environment and experience of patients and may offer direction in how to improve functional independence, symptom burden, and kidney transplant outcomes in adults with frailty. This photovoice study was embedded within a larger intervention adaptation project. Participants with pre-frailty or frailty awaiting a KT or recently post-transplant took photos with Polaroid cameras and wrote short descriptions for 11 prompts. Each participant completed a semi-structured interview wherein their photos were discussed. The team coded and discussed photos and interviews to determine overarching themes and implications. Focus groups were used to triangulate visual data findings. Sixteen participants completed both the photovoice and interview. Participants were a mean age of 60.5 years, 31.2% female, 43.4% self-identifying as Black, and 69% were frail. Outcomes were categorized into seven themes: functional space, home safety, medication management, adaptive coping, life changing nature of dialysis, support and communication. Visual data clarified and sometimes changed the interpretations of the text alone. Especially within the themes of home safety and functional space, safety hazards not previously recognized in the literature, like dialysis fluid storage, were identified. Photovoice contextualizes the living conditions and experiences of adults with frailty on the kidney transplant journey and could be a useful tool in geriatric nephrology and transplant. Addressing issues of home storage, organization, and accessibility should be explored as potential intervention targets. Incorporating participant values and goals into care decisions and interventional design should be further explored.

Bridging Over Troubled Waters-How the United States 2018 Heart Allocation System Altered Transplant Bridging Strategies.

As we approach the five-year anniversary of the 2018 heart allocation system in the United States, it is imperative to consider the changing landscape of mechanical circulatory support and the strategies used to bridge patients into heart transplants. This manuscript reviews the history of the heart allocation system, as well as the conditions that led to its multiple revisions. We discuss initial outcomes following the implementation of the new allocation system, including the impact on waitlist mortality and post-transplant outcomes. We also give special consideration to changes in bridging strategies using venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO), intra-aortic balloon pumps, and durable left ventricular assist devices (LVADs).

Elevated pulmonary vascular resistance is associated with increased lung transplant waitlist mortality among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and pulmonary hypertension: a retrospective cohort analysis

BackgroundThe latest European Society of Cardiology and European Respiratory Society guidelines have changed the definition of both pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension (PH) and severe PH in chronic lung disease. The clinical significance of these new criteria are unclear among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)-PH. We aim to examine the clinical significance of the new PH definitions with regards to lung transplant waitlist mortality amongst patients with COPD-PH.MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort study of adult patients with COPD-PH listed for lung transplantation. Kaplan–Meier survival analyses were performed comparing patients with newly defined pre-capillary PH to those without pre-capillary PH and comparing patients with severe PH, defined as pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) > 5 WU, to those without severe PH. Both mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) and PVR were analyzed for potential cut-off points associated with increased waitlist mortality. Predictors of waitlist mortality were identified via Cox regression.ResultsAmong 6495 patients with COPD-PH listed for lung transplantation, pre-capillary PH was not associated with increased waitlist mortality (logrank p = 0.43), while severe PH was (logrank p < 0.001). Both severe PH (HR 1.79, 95% CI 1.22–2.60, p = 0.003) and PVR > 3.9 WU (HR 1.49, 95% CI 1.14–1.95, p = 0.004) were independently and significantly associated with increased waitlist mortality.ConclusionsPVR may serve as a strong predictor of lung transplant waitlist mortality among patients with COPD-PH as compared to other pulmonary hemodynamic parameters when predicting transplant waitlist mortality.

The impact of high volumes of COVID-related lung transplant on waitlist mortality for non-COVID candidates in the United States.

Some patients with coronavirus disease 19 (COVID) develop serious, irreversible lung disease, including acute respiratory distress syndrome or pulmonary fibrosis. For select candidates, lung transplant is the only option to improve quality and length of life. Because of the severity of end-stage COVID-related lung disease, these candidates receive high allocation priority in the United States, including higher priority than many patients without COVID-related lung disease. This study assessed whether transplant centers with a large volume of COVID-related lung transplants experienced an increase in waitlist mortality for non-COVID transplant candidates. Nineteen centers were included as high-volume programs, defined as being in the top third of centers who transplanted COVID patients. Of the 2867 non-COVID patients waitlisted at these centers, there was no significant difference in waitlist mortalities of non-COVID transplant candidates between the pre-COVID transplant era (January 2018-February 2020) and during the period of high COVID transplant volume (March 2020-October 2022) (subhazard ratio: .92 [95% CI=.81-1.05], p=.22). Among high volume centers, the decision to transplant and to prioritize patients with COVID-related lung disease did not significantly impact the waitlist mortality of other candidates.

Heart transplantation from COVID-positive donors with 6-month follow-up: A case series.

Data on long term outcomes in heart transplant recipients from Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) positive donors are limited. We present a series of nine patients who underwent heart transplants from COVID-19 PCR-positive donors between November 2021 to August 2022 with mean follow-up of 12.12±3 months. All the recipients received two doses of COVID-19 vaccine and had at least 6 months follow-up. Eight recipients had acceptable long-term outcomes; one patient died during index admission from primary graft dysfunction. Details regarding donor and recipient characteristics, management and outcomes are provided. Two patients developed deep vein thrombosis, and one patient underwent pacemaker implantation for sinus node dysfunction. Among the surviving eight patients, none developed COVID-19 infection during follow-up period. There was no significant difference in outcome parameters when compared to patients who received hearts from donors who tested negative for COVID-19 during the same time period at our center. Keeping in mind the significant waitlist mortality in patients awaiting heart transplantation, COVID-19-positive donors should be considered for heart transplantation to help expand the donor pool and potentially reduce waitlist mortality.

Waitlist Outcomes in Candidates With Rare Causes of Heart Failure After Implementation of the 2018 French Heart Allocation Scheme.

In 2018, an algorithm-based allocation system for heart transplantation (HT) was implemented in France. Its effect on access to HT of patients with rare causes of heart failure (HF) has not been assessed. In this national study, including adults listed for HT between 2018 and 2020, we analyzed waitlist and posttransplant outcomes of candidates with rare causes of HF (restrictive cardiomyopathy [RCM], hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, and congenital heart disease). The primary end point was death on the waitlist or delisting for clinical deterioration. Secondary end points included access to HT and posttransplant mortality. The cumulative incidence of waitlist mortality estimated with competing risk analysis and incidence of transplantation were compared between diagnosis groups. The association of HF cause with outcomes was determined by Fine-Gray or Cox models. Overall, 1604 candidates were listed for HT. At 1 year postlisting, 175 patients met the primary end point and 1040 underwent HT. Candidates listed for rare causes of HF significantly differed in baseline characteristics and had more frequent score exceptions compared with other cardiomyopathies (31.3%, 32.0%, 36.4%, and 16.7% for patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, RCM, congenital heart disease, and other cardiomyopathies). The cumulative incidence of death on the waitlist and probability of HT were similar between diagnosis groups (P=0.17 and 0.40, respectively). The adjusted risk of death or delisting for clinical deterioration did not significantly differ between candidates with rare and common causes of HF (subdistribution hazard ratio (HR): hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.19-1.38]; P=0.18; RCM, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.42-2.58]; P=0.94; congenital heart disease, 1.82 [95% CI, 0.78-4.26]; P=0.17). Similarly, the access to HT did not significantly differ between causes of HF (hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: HR, 1.18 [95% CI, 0.92-1.51]; P=0.19; RCM: HR, 1.19 [95% CI, 0.90-1.58]; P=0.23; congenital heart disease: HR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.53-1.09]; P=0.14). RCM was an independent risk factor for 1-year posttransplant mortality (HR, 2.12 [95% CI, 1.06-4.24]; P=0.03). Our study shows equitable waitlist outcomes among HT candidates whatever the indication for transplantation with the new French allocation scheme.

Excess waitlist mortality among candidates for multivisceral liver-intestine transplant in acuity circle allocation

Candidates for multivisceral transplant (MVT) have experienced decreased access to transplant in recent years. Using Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data, transplant and waiting list outcomes for MVT (ie, liver-intestine, liver-intestine-pancreas, and liver-intestine-kidney-pancreas) candidates listed between February 4, 2018, and February 3, 2022, were analyzed, including model for end-stage liver disease/pediatric end-stage liver disease and exception scores by era (before and after acuity circle [AC] implementation on February 4, 2020) and age group (pediatric and adult). Of 284 MVT waitlist registrations (45.6% pediatric), fewer had exception points at listing post-AC compared to pre-AC (10.0% vs 19.1%), and they were less likely to receive transplant (19.1% vs 35.9% at 90 days; 35.7% vs 57.2% at 1 year). Of 177 MVT recipients, exception points at transplant were more common post-AC compared to pre-AC (30.8% vs 20.2%). Postpolicy, adult MVT candidates were more likely to be removed due to death/too sick compared with liver-alone candidates (13.5% vs 5.6% at 90 days; 24.2% vs 9.8% at 1 year), whereas no excess waitlist mortality was observed among pediatric MVT candidates. Under current allocation policy, multivisceral candidates experience inferior waitlist outcomes compared with liver-alone candidates. Clarification of guidance around submission and approval of multivisceral exception requests may help improve their access to transplantation and achieve equity between multivisceral and liver-alone candidates on the liver transplant waiting list.