Wait Anaphase Research Articles

The Bub1-TPR Domain Interacts Directly with Mad3 to Generate Robust Spindle Checkpoint Arrest

SummaryThe spindle checkpoint monitors kinetochore-microtubule interactions and generates a “wait anaphase” delay when any defects are apparent [1, 2, 3]. This provides time for cells to correct chromosome attachment errors and ensure high-fidelity chromosome segregation. Checkpoint signals are generated at unattached chromosomes during mitosis. To activate the checkpoint, Mps1Mph1 kinase phosphorylates the kinetochore component KNL1Spc105/Spc7 on conserved MELT motifs to recruit Bub3-Bub1 complexes [4, 5, 6] via a direct Bub3 interaction with phospho-MELT motifs [7, 8]. Mps1Mph1 then phosphorylates Bub1, which strengthens its interaction with Mad1-Mad2 complexes to produce a signaling platform [9, 10]. The Bub1-Mad1 platform is thought to recruit Mad3, Cdc20, and Mad2 to produce the mitotic checkpoint complex (MCC), which is the diffusible wait anaphase signal [9, 11, 12]. The MCC binds and inhibits the mitotic E3 ubiquitin ligase, known as Cdc20-anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C), and stabilizes securin and cyclin to delay anaphase onset [13, 14, 15, 16, 17]. Here we demonstrate, in both budding and fission yeast, that kinetochores and KNL1Spc105/Spc7 can be bypassed; simply inducing heterodimers of Mps1Mph1 kinase and Bub1 is sufficient to trigger metaphase arrest that is dependent on Mad1, Mad2, and Mad3. We use this to dissect the domains of Bub1 necessary for arrest, highlighting the need for Bub1-CD1, which binds Mad1 [9], and Bub1’s highly conserved N-terminal tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR) domain [18, 19]. We demonstrate that the Bub1 TPR domain is both necessary and sufficient to bind and recruit Mad3. We propose that this brings Mad3 into close proximity to Mad1-Mad2 and Mps1Mph1 kinase, enabling efficient generation of MCC complexes.

Efficient mitotic checkpoint signaling depends on integrated activities of Bub1 and the RZZ complex.

Kinetochore localized Mad1 is essential for generating a "wait anaphase" signal during mitosis, hereby ensuring accurate chromosome segregation. Inconsistent models for the function and quantitative contribution of the two mammalian Mad1 kinetochore receptors: Bub1 and the Rod-Zw10-Zwilch (RZZ) complex exist. By combining genome editing and RNAi, we achieve penetrant removal of Bub1 and Rod in human cells, which reveals that efficient checkpoint signaling depends on the integrated activities of these proteins. Rod removal reduces the proximity of Bub1 and Mad1, and we can bypass the requirement for Rod by tethering Mad1 to kinetochores or increasing the strength of the Bub1-Mad1 interaction. We find that Bub1 has checkpoint functions independent of Mad1 localization that are supported by low levels of Bub1 suggesting a catalytic function. In conclusion, our results support an integrated model for the Mad1 receptors in which the primary role of RZZ is to localize Mad1 at kinetochores to generate the Mad1-Bub1 complex.

Distinct Roles of RZZ and Bub1-KNL1 in Mitotic Checkpoint Signaling and Kinetochore Expansion

The Mad1-Mad2 heterodimer is the catalytic hub of the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC), which controls M phase progression through a multi-subunit anaphase inhibitor, the mitotic checkpoint complex (MCC) [1, 2]. During interphase, Mad1-Mad2 generates MCC at nuclear pores [3]. After nuclear envelope breakdown (NEBD), kinetochore-associated Mad1-Mad2 catalyzes MCC assembly until all chromosomes achieve bipolar attachment [1, 2]. Mad1-Mad2 and other factors are also incorporated into the fibrous corona, a phospho-dependent expansion of the outer kinetochore that precedes microtubule attachment [4-6]. The factor(s) involved in targeting Mad1-Mad2 to kinetochores in higher eukaryotes remain controversial [7-12], and the specific phosphorylation event(s) that trigger corona formation remain elusive [5, 13]. We used genome editing to eliminate Bub1, KNL1, and the Rod-Zw10-Zwilch (RZZ) complex in human cells. We show that RZZ's sole role in SAC activation is to tether Mad1-Mad2 to kinetochores. Separately, Mps1 kinase triggers fibrous corona formation by phosphorylating two N-terminal sites on Rod. In contrast, Bub1 and KNL1 activate kinetochore-bound Mad1-Mad2 to produce a "wait anaphase" signal but are not required for corona formation. We also show that clonal lines isolated after BUB1 disruption recover Bub1 expression and SAC function through nonsense-associated alternative splicing (NAS). Our study reveals a fundamental division of labor in the mammalian SAC and highlights a transcriptional response tononsense mutations that can reduce or eliminate penetrance in genome editing experiments.

The RZZ Complex Facilitates Mad1 Binding to Bub1 Ensuring Efficient Checkpoint Signaling

The recruitment of Mad1 to unattached kinetochores is essential for generating a “wait anaphase” signal during mitosis yet Mad1 localization is poorly understood in mammalian cells. In yeast the Bub1 checkpoint protein is the sole Mad1 receptor but in mammalian cells the Rod-ZW10-Zwilch (RZZ) complex is also required for Mad1 kinetochore localization. The exact function of the two mammalian Mad1 receptors and whether there is any interplay between them is unclear. Here we use CRISPR genome editing to generate RNAi sensitized human cell lines revealing a strong requirement for both Rod and Bub1 in checkpoint signaling. We show that the RZZ complex facilitates Mad1 binding to Bub1 and that a region of Bub1 overlapping the Mad1 binding site stimulates RZZ kinetochore recruitment. The requirement for RZZ in the checkpoint, but not Bub1, can be bypassed by tethering Mad1 to kinetochores or by increasing the strength of the Bub1-Mad1 interaction. Our data support a model in which the primary role of RZZ is to localize Mad1 at kinetochores allowing for the efficient checkpoint generating Mad1-Bub1 interaction. As such, the core checkpoint principle is conserved from yeast to man.

“Wait anaphase” signals are not confined to the mitotic spindle

The spindle assembly checkpoint ensures the faithful inheritance of chromosomes by arresting mitotic progression in the presence of kinetochores that are not attached to spindle microtubules. This is achieved through inhibition of the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome by a kinetochore-derived "wait anaphase" signal known as the mitotic checkpoint complex. It remains unclear whether the localization and activity of these inhibitory complexes are restricted to the mitotic spindle compartment or are diffusible throughout the cytoplasm. Here we report that "wait anaphase" signals are indeed able to diffuse outside the confines of the mitotic spindle compartment. Using a cell fusion approach to generate multinucleate cells, we investigate the effects of checkpoint signals derived from one spindle compartment on a neighboring spindle compartment. We find that spindle compartments in close proximity wait for one another to align all chromosomes before entering anaphase synchronously. Synchrony is disrupted in cells with increased interspindle distances and cellular constrictions between spindle compartments. In addition, when mitotic cells are fused with interphase cells, "wait anaphase" signals are diluted, resulting in premature mitotic exit. Overall our studies reveal that anaphase inhibitors are diffusible and active outside the confines of the mitotic spindle from which they are derived.

Cell division: Mitotic regulation comes into focus.

Structural studies provide insight into the mechanisms governing a checkpoint in cell division that prevents chromosomes from segregating before they are properly aligned on a structure called the mitotic spindle. See Article p.431 The spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) is a surveillance mechanism that detects incorrect chromatid kinetochore attachments and delays chromosome segregation by generating a 'wait anaphase' signal. It is activated via the mitotic checkpoint complex (MCC), which inhibits the anaphase-promoting complex (APC/C), a multimeric E3 ligase. Here, David Barford and colleagues use cryo-electron microscopy to determine near-atomic resolution structures of the APC/C–MCC complex. The structures reveal how MCC interacts with and represses APC/C by obstructing substrate recognition and suppressing E3 ligase activity.

Mad1 promotes chromosome congression by anchoring a kinesin motor to the kinetochore.

For proper partitioning of genomes in mitosis, all chromosomes must be aligned at the spindle equator before the onset of anaphase. The spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) monitors this process, generating a 'wait anaphase' signal at unattached kinetochores of misaligned chromosomes. However, the link between SAC activation and chromosome alignment is poorly understood. Here we show that Mad1, a core SAC component, plays a hitherto concealed role in chromosome alignment. Protein-protein interaction screening revealed that fission yeast Mad1 binds the plus-end-directed kinesin-5 motor protein Cut7 (Eg5 homologue), which is generally thought to promote spindle bipolarity. We demonstrate that Mad1 recruits Cut7 to kinetochores of misaligned chromosomes and promotes chromosome gliding towards the spindle equator. Similarly, human Mad1 recruits another kinetochore motor CENP-E, revealing that Mad1 is the conserved dual-function protein acting in SAC activation and chromosome gliding. Our results suggest that the mitotic checkpoint has co-evolved with a mechanism to drive chromosome congression.

The mitotic checkpoint complex binds a second CDC20 to inhibit active APC/C.

The Spindle Assembly Checkpoint (SAC) maintains genomic stability by delaying chromosome segregation until the last chromosome has attached to the mitotic spindle. The SAC prevents the Anaphase Promoting Complex/Cyclosome (APC/C) ubiquitin ligase from recognising Cyclin B and securin by catalysing the incorporation of the APC/C co-activator, CDC20, into a complex called the Mitotic Checkpoint Complex (MCC). The SAC works through unattached kinetochores generating a diffusible ‘wait anaphase’ signal1,2 that inhibits the APC/C in the cytoplasm, but the nature of this signal remains a key unsolved problem. Moreover, the SAC and the APC/C are highly responsive to each other: the APC/C quickly targets Cyclin B and securin once all the chromosomes attach in metaphase, but is rapidly inhibited should kinetochore attachment be perturbed3,4. How this is achieved is also unknown. Here, we show that the MCC can inhibit a second CDC20 that has already bound and activated the APC/C. We show how the MCC inhibits active APC/C and that this is essential for the SAC. Moreover, this mechanism can prevent anaphase in the absence of kinetochore signalling. Thus, we propose that the diffusible ‘wait anaphase’ signal could be the MCC itself, and explain how reactivating the SAC can rapidly inhibit active APC/C.

Nuclear Pores Protect Genome Integrity by Assembling a Premitotic and Mad1-Dependent Anaphase Inhibitor

The spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) delays anaphase until all chromosomes are bioriented on the mitotic spindle. Under current models, unattached kinetochores transduce the SAC by catalyzing the intramitotic production of a diffusible inhibitor of APC/C(Cdc20) (the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome and its coactivator Cdc20, a large ubiquitin ligase). Here we show that nuclear pore complexes (NPCs) in interphase cells also function as scaffolds for anaphase-inhibitory signaling. This role is mediated by Mad1-Mad2 complexes tethered to the nuclear basket, which activate soluble Mad2 as a binding partner and inhibitor of Cdc20 in the cytoplasm. Displacing Mad1-Mad2 from nuclear pores accelerated anaphase onset, prevented effective correction of merotelic errors, and increased the threshold of kinetochore-dependent signaling needed to halt mitosis in response to spindle poisons. A heterologous Mad1-NPC tether restored Cdc20 inhibitor production and normal Mphase control. We conclude that nuclear pores and kinetochores both emit "wait anaphase" signals that preserve genome integrity.

Mad2 and the APC/C compete for the same site on Cdc20 to ensure proper chromosome segregation

The spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) is essential to ensure proper chromosome segregation and thereby maintain genomic stability. The SAC monitors chromosome attachment, and any unattached chromosomes generate a "wait anaphase" signal that blocks chromosome segregation. The target of the SAC is Cdc20, which activates the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) that triggers anaphase and mitotic exit by ubiquitylating securin and cyclin B1. The inhibitory complex formed by the SAC has recently been shown to inhibit Cdc20 by acting as a pseudosubstrate inhibitor, but in this paper, we show that Mad2 also inhibits Cdc20 by binding directly to a site required to bind the APC/C. Mad2 and the APC/C competed for Cdc20 in vitro, and a Cdc20 mutant that does not bind stably to Mad2 abrogated the SAC in vivo. Thus, we provide insights into how Cdc20 binds the APC/C and uncover a second mechanism by which the SAC inhibits the APC/C.

Timing of anaphase-promoting complex activation in mouse oocytes is predicted by microtubule-kinetochore attachment but not by bivalent alignment or tension

Homologous chromosome segregation errors during meiosis I are common and generate aneuploid embryos. Here, we provide a reason for this susceptibility to mis-segregation by live cell imaging of mouse oocytes. Our results show that stable kinetochore-microtubule attachments form in mid-prometaphase, 3-4 hours before anaphase. This coincided with the loss of Mad2 from kinetochores and with the start of anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C)-mediated cyclin B1 destruction. Therefore, the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) ceased to inhibit the APC/C from mid-prometaphase. This timing did not coincide with bivalent congression in one-third of all oocytes examined. Non-aligned bivalents were weakly positive for Mad2, under less tension than congressed bivalents and, by live-cell imaging, appeared to be in the process of establishing correct bi-orientation. The time from when the APC/C became active until anaphase onset was affected by the rate of loss of CDK1 activity, rather than by these non-aligned bivalents, which occasionally persisted until anaphase, resulting in homolog non-disjunction. We conclude that, in oocytes, a few erroneous attachments of bivalent kinetochores to microtubules do not generate a sufficient SAC 'wait anaphase' signal to inhibit the APC/C.

Timing of anaphase-promoting complex activation in mouse oocytes is predicted by microtubule-kinetochore attachment but not by bivalent alignment or tension

Homologous chromosome segregation errors during meiosis I are common and generate aneuploid embryos. Here, we provide a reason for this susceptibility to mis-segregation by live cell imaging of mouse oocytes. Our results show that stable kinetochore-microtubule attachments form in mid-prometaphase, 3-4 hours before anaphase. This coincided with the loss of Mad2 from kinetochores and with the start of anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C)-mediated cyclin B1 destruction. Therefore, the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) ceased to inhibit the APC/C from mid-prometaphase. This timing did not coincide with bivalent congression in one-third of all oocytes examined. Non-aligned bivalents were weakly positive for Mad2, under less tension than congressed bivalents and, by live-cell imaging, appeared to be in the process of establishing correct bi-orientation. The time from when the APC/C became active until anaphase onset was affected by the rate of loss of CDK1 activity, rather than by these non-aligned bivalents, which occasionally persisted until anaphase, resulting in homolog non-disjunction. We conclude that, in oocytes, a few erroneous attachments of bivalent kinetochores to microtubules do not generate a sufficient SAC 'wait anaphase' signal to inhibit the APC/C.

P31comet acts to ensure timely spindle checkpoint silencing subsequent to kinetochore attachment

The spindle assembly checkpoint links the onset of anaphase to completion of chromosome-microtubule attachment and is mediated by the binding of Mad and Bub proteins to kinetochores of unattached or maloriented chromosomes. Mad2 and BubR1 traffic between kinetochores and the cytosol, thereby transmitting a "wait anaphase" signal to the anaphase-promoting complex. It is generally assumed that this signal dissipates automatically upon kinetochore-microtubule binding, but it has been shown that under conditions of nocodazole-induced arrest p31(comet), a Mad2-binding protein, is required for mitotic progression. In this article we investigate the localization and function of p31(comet) during normal, unperturbed mitosis in human and marsupial cells. We find that, like Mad2, p31(comet) traffics on and off kinetochores and is also present in the cytosol. Cells depleted of p31(comet) arrest in metaphase with mature bipolar kinetochore-microtubule attachments, a satisfied checkpoint, and high cyclin B levels. Thus p31(comet) is required for timely mitotic exit. We propose that p31(comet) is an essential component of the machinery that silences the checkpoint during each cell cycle.

Mad2 haploinsufficiency protects hematopoietic progenitor cells subjected to cell-cycle stress in vivo and to inhibition of redox function of Ape1/Ref-1 in vitro

Cell-cycle checkpoints guarantee movement through the cell cycle. Mitotic arrest deficiency 2 (Mad2), a mitotic checkpoint protein, appears crucial for generating the wait anaphase signal to prevent onset of anaphase. We evaluated effects of Mad2 haploinsufficiency on hematopoietic stem (HSC) and progenitor (HPC) function in response to stress. We studied effects of Mad2(+/-) on in vivo recovery of bone marrow HPC from cytotoxic effects and also effects of cytostatic agents on HPC growth in vitro using Mad2(+/-) mice. Mad2(+/-) HPCs were protected from cytotoxic effects in vivo of a cell-cycle-specific agent, Ara-C, events consistent with Mad2(+/-) HPCs being in a slow or noncycling state, but not from recovery of functional HPC after treatment with non-cycle-specific cyclophosphamide or sublethal irradiation. There were no differences in phenotyped HSCs in Mad2(+/-) &Mad2(+/+) mice, information confirmed by no changes in short- or long-term repopulating HSC assay. To better understand Mad2(+/-) HPC function, E3330, a cytostatic agent, was used to assess redox function of Ape1/Ref-1; colony growth was examined under 5% and 20% O(2) tension. Mad2(+/-) HPCs were less responsive to E3330 than Mad2(+/+) HPCs, and E3330 was more effective under lowered O(2) tension. Mad2(+/-) HPCs were not enhanced at lowered oxygen, as were Mad2(+/+) HPCs. Our studies have unexpectedly found that Mad2 haploinsufficiency is protective in the presence of a cycle-specific DNA synthesis agent in vivo, and Ape1/Ref-1 inhibitor invitro.

Removal of Spindly from microtubule-attached kinetochores controls spindle checkpoint silencing in human cells

The spindle checkpoint generates a "wait anaphase" signal at unattached kinetochores to prevent premature anaphase onset. Kinetochore-localized dynein is thought to silence the checkpoint by transporting checkpoint proteins from microtubule-attached kinetochores to spindle poles. Throughout metazoans, dynein recruitment to kinetochores requires the protein Spindly. Here, we identify a conserved motif in Spindly that is essential for kinetochore targeting of dynein. Spindly motif mutants, expressed following depletion of endogenous Spindly, target normally to kinetochores but prevent dynein recruitment. Spindly depletion and Spindly motif mutants, despite their similar effects on kinetochore dynein, have opposite consequences on chromosome alignment and checkpoint silencing. Spindly depletion delays chromosome alignment, but Spindly motif mutants ameliorate this defect, indicating that Spindly has a dynein recruitment-independent role in alignment. In Spindly depletions, the checkpoint is silenced following delayed alignment by a kinetochore dynein-independent mechanism. In contrast, Spindly motif mutants are retained on microtubule-attached kinetochores along with checkpoint proteins, resulting in persistent checkpoint signaling. Thus, dynein-mediated removal of Spindly from microtubule-attached kinetochores, rather than poleward transport per se, is the critical reaction in checkpoint silencing. In the absence of Spindly, a second mechanism silences the checkpoint; this mechanism is likely evolutionarily ancient, as fungi and higher plants lack kinetochore dynein.

Mad2 Haploinsufficiency Unexpectedly Protects Hematopoietic Progenitor Cells From Ara-C Mediated Cytotoxicity.

Abstract 2543Poster Board II-520Cell cycle checkpoints guarantee movement through the events of the cell cycle in the appropriate manner. The spindle assembly checkpoint helps to ensure the proper segregation of chromosomes into daughter cells during mitosis. Mitotic arrest deficiency 2 (Mad2) is a member of the mitotic checkpoint proteins and appears to be crucial for generating the wait anaphase signal to prevent onset of anaphase in the presence of microtubule disruption. We studied the role of Mad2 in hematopoiesis using Mad2-haploinsufficient (Mad2+/−) mice as a follow-up to our previous studies (Ito et al. Blood. 2007 Mar 1;109(5):1923–30), in which we found decreased numbers and cycling status of functionally assessed myeloid progenitors, effects we confirmed here. We examined different hematopoietic stem (HSC) and progenitor (HPC) populations by phenotypic analysis to determine if any differences occur in the phenotyped HSC/HPC populations in Mad2+/− mice compared to littermate control Mad2+/+ mice. Examining the lineage− sca-1+ c-kit+ IL-7Rα− cells (a population enriched for HSC), we observed no significant difference in this population in the Mad2+/− &Mad2+/+ mice. This data was confirmed by competitive repopulation assays in which we did not observe significant differences in the short (1 month) or long (6 months) term repopulating ability of Mad2+/− &Mad2+/+ HSC. We also looked at the common lymphoid progenitor, megakaryocyte/erythroid progenitor, common myeloid progenitor (CMP), and granulocyte/macrophage progenitor populations in both types of mice, and found that absolute numbers of CMP were significantly increased in the Mad2+/− mice. This difference did not translate into changes in blood counts or in total cellularity of marrow and spleen. Because of the importance of Mad2 in mitosis, we hypothesized that the hematopoietic system of Mad2+/− mice might be more sensitive than Mad2+/+ mice to the cytotoxic effects of irradiation and chemotherapeutic agents. We thus studied the effect of Mad2 haploinsufficiency on the recovery of bone marrow HPC from cytotoxic effects. No significant differences were observed in the recovery of functional HPC after treatment with cyclophosphamide (200 mg/kg, i.p.) or a high sub-lethal dose (650 rad) of irradiation, but we unexpectedly found that Mad2 haploinsufficiency protected the HPCs from the cytotoxic affects of cytarabine (Ara-C) (500 mg/kg, s.c.). The number of Mad2+/− HPCs, in contrast to the number of Mad2+/+ littermate control HPCs, does not decrease during the nadir period of recovery from Ara-C treatment, and thus these cells appear to be protected from the cytotoxic effects of Ara-C. Thus, our studies have unexpectedly found that Mad2 haploinsufficiency does not render the hematopoietic system more susceptible than control mice to the suppressive effects of cytotoxic treatment. In fact, Mad2 haploinsufficiency may be somewhat myeloprotective to a specific DNA synthesis inhibitor. The decreased percentage of cycling Mad2+/− HPCs compared to Mad2+/+ HPCs might in part account for the differences observed in the recovery of HPCs from treatment with Ara-C, which selectively inhibits DNA synthesis, mainly affecting rapidly dividing cells. The differences might also be due to the increased absolute numbers of CMP observed in Mad2+/− mice. Even though the Mad2+/− HPCs did not appear to be protected from the effects of treatment with cyclophosphamide or γ-radiation, they recovered in a similar manner to Mad2+/+ HPC, indicating that they are not any more sensitive to these cytotoxic treatments than the Mad2+/+ HPC. Disclosures:No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Spindle Assembly Checkpoint Protein Dynamics Reveal Conserved and Unsuspected Roles in Plant Cell Division

BackgroundIn eukaryotes, the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) ensures that chromosomes undergoing mitosis do not segregate until they are properly attached to the microtubules of the spindle.Methodology/Principal FindingsWe investigated the mechanism underlying this surveillance mechanism in plants, by characterising the orthogolous SAC proteins BUBR1, BUB3 and MAD2 from Arabidopsis. We showed that the cell cycle-regulated BUBR1, BUB3.1 and MAD2 proteins interacted physically with each other. Furthermore, BUBR1 and MAD2 interacted specifically at chromocenters. Following SAC activation by global defects in spindle assembly, these three interacting partners localised to unattached kinetochores. In addition, in cases of ‘wait anaphase’, plant SAC proteins were associated with both kinetochores and kinetochore microtubules. Unexpectedly, BUB3.1 was also found in the phragmoplast midline during the final step of cell division in plants.Conclusions/SignificanceWe conclude that plant BUBR1, BUB3.1 and MAD2 proteins may have the SAC protein functions conserved from yeast to humans. The association of BUB3.1 with both unattached kinetochore and phragmoplast suggests that in plant, BUB3.1 may have other roles beyond the spindle assembly checkpoint itself. Finally, this study of the SAC dynamics pinpoints uncharacterised roles of this surveillance mechanism in plant cell division.

The role of localization in the operation of the mitotic spindle assembly checkpoint

The mitotic spindle assembly checkpoint (MSAC) is an important regulatory mechanism of the cell cycle, ensuring proper chromosome segregation in mitosis. It delays the transition to anaphase until all chromosomes are properly attached to the mitotic spindle by emitting a diffusible “wait anaphase”-signal from unattached kinetochores. Current models of the checkpoint disregard important spatial properties like localization, diffusion and realistic numbers of kinetochores. To allow for in silico studies of the dynamics of these models in a more realistic environment, we introduce a mathematical framework for quasi-spatial simulation of localized biochemical processes that are typically observed during checkpoint activation and maintenance. The “emitted inhibition” model of the MSAC by Doncic et al. (Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102:6332–7) assumes instantaneous activation of the diffusible “wait anaphase”-signal upon kinetochore encounter. We modify this model to account for binding kinetics with finite rates and use the developed framework to determine the feasible range of the binding parameters. We find that for proper activation, the binding rate constant has to be fast and above a critical value. Furthermore, this critical value depends significantly on the amount of local binding sites at each kinetochore. The critical values lie in a physiological realistic regime (104–106 M-1s-1). We also determine the feasible parameter range for fast checkpoint activation of the “Mad2 template” model, for which the kinetic parameters have recently been studied in vitro by Simonetta et al. (PLoS Biology 2009; 7:1000010). We find critical values for binding and catalysis rate constants, both significantly higher than the measured values. Our results suggest that yet unknown mechanisms at the kinetochores facilitate binding and catalysis in vivo. We conclude that quantitative models of the MSAC have to account for the limited availability of binding sites at kinetochores.

Kinase Signaling in the Spindle Checkpoint

The spindle checkpoint is a cell cycle surveillance system that ensures the fidelity of chromosome segregation. In mitosis, it elicits the "wait anaphase" signal to inhibit the anaphase-promoting complex or cyclosome until all chromosomes achieve bipolar microtubule attachment and align at the metaphase plate. Because a single kinetochore unattached to microtubules activates the checkpoint, the wait anaphase signal is thought to be generated by this kinetochore and is then amplified and distributed throughout the cell to inhibit the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome. Several spindle checkpoint kinases participate in the generation and amplification of this signal. Recent studies have begun to reveal the activation mechanisms of these checkpoint kinases. Increasing evidence also indicates that the checkpoint kinases not only help to generate the wait anaphase signal but also actively correct kinetochore-microtubule attachment defects.

Spatiotemporal control of mitosis by the conserved spindle matrix protein Megator

A putative spindle matrix has been hypothesized to mediate chromosome motion, but its existence and functionality remain controversial. In this report, we show that Megator (Mtor), the Drosophila melanogaster counterpart of the human nuclear pore complex protein translocated promoter region (Tpr), and the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) protein Mad2 form a conserved complex that localizes to a nuclear derived spindle matrix in living cells. Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching experiments supports that Mtor is retained around spindle microtubules, where it shows distinct dynamic properties. Mtor/Tpr promotes the recruitment of Mad2 and Mps1 but not Mad1 to unattached kinetochores (KTs), mediating normal mitotic duration and SAC response. At anaphase, Mtor plays a role in spindle elongation, thereby affecting normal chromosome movement. We propose that Mtor/Tpr functions as a spatial regulator of the SAC, which ensures the efficient recruitment of Mad2 to unattached KTs at the onset of mitosis and proper spindle maturation, whereas enrichment of Mad2 in a spindle matrix helps confine the action of a diffusible “wait anaphase” signal to the vicinity of the spindle.