Volume Replacement Techniques Research Articles

Clinical and patient-reported outcomes in women offered oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery as an alternative to mastectomy: ANTHEM multicentre prospective cohort study.

Oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery may be a better option than mastectomy, but high-quality comparative evidence is lacking. The aim of the ANTHEM study (ISRCTN18238549) was to explore clinical and patient-reported outcomes in a multicentre cohort of women offered oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery as an alternative to mastectomy with or without immediate breast reconstruction. Women with invasive/pre-invasive breast cancer who were offered oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery with volume replacement or displacement techniques to avoid mastectomy were recruited prospectively. Demographic, operative, oncological, and 3- and 12-month complication data were collected. The proportion of women choosing oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery and the proportion in whom breast conservation was successful were calculated. Participants completed the validated BREAST-Q questionnaire at baseline, 3 months after surgery, and 12 months after surgery. Questionnaires were scored according to the developers' instructions and scores for each group were compared over time. In total, 362 women from 32 UK breast units participated, of whom 294 (81.2%) chose oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery. Of the oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery patients in whom postoperative margin status was reported, 210 of 255 (82.4%) had clear margins after initial surgery and only 10 (3.9%) required completion mastectomy. Major complications were significantly more likely after immediate breast reconstruction. Women having oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery with volume displacement techniques reported significant improvements in baseline 'satisfaction with breasts' and 'psychosocial well-being' scores at 3 and 12 months, but both oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery groups reported significant decreases in 'physical well-being: chest' at 3 and 12 months. Oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery allows greater than 95% of women to avoid mastectomy, with lower major complication rates than immediate breast reconstruction, and may improve satisfaction with outcome. Oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery should be offered as an alternative to mastectomy in all women in whom it is technically feasible.

Investigating the effectiveness and safety of volume displacement and replacement techniques in oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery

Investigating the effectiveness and safety of volume displacement and replacement techniques in oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery

Preventing Bird’s Beak Deformity: A narrative review of Innovations in Oncoplastic Surgery

Background: In the field of breast surgery, breast conserving surgery (BCS) is widely valued for its ability to preserve the breast while also achieving cosmetically acceptable outcomes and an overall survival rate comparable to that of total mastectomy. However, BCS has not always managed to achieved satisfactory cosmetic results. Among its challenges is the “bird’s beak” deformity, which is characterized by skin retraction and a downward deviation of the nipple areolar complex due to tissue excision from the lower pole of the breast. Methods: Various forms of oncoplastic surgery (OPS) have been developed to prevent bird’s beak deformity. These include volume displacement operations (such as superior pedicle mammoplasty, rotation technique and downward-mobilization procedure), as well as volume replacement techniques, including the latissimus dorsi mini-flap, thoracodorsal artery perforator flap, lateral intercostal artery perforator flap, anterior intercostal artery perforator flap, inframammary adipofascial flap and lipofilling. Conclusion: Choosing the most suitable approach for OPS requires careful consideration of various factors, notably the defect’s size and location, the size of the breast, and the thickness of subcutaneous fatty tissue. Further studies are required to firmly position these forms of OPS techniques in an evidence-based framework.

Oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery: evolution, techniques, and the emerging role of acellular dermal matrix

Oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery (OBCS) has revolutionized breast cancer treatment, aiming to achieve optimal oncological outcomes while preserving an aesthetically favorable appearance. This review explores the evolution, techniques, and outcomes of OBCS, with a particular focus on the emerging role of acellular dermal matrix in volume replacement techniques. We conducted a comprehensive literature review using PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane databases, focusing on studies published between 2010 and 2024. OBCS demonstrates comparable oncological safety to traditional breast-conserving surgery, with local recurrence rates ranging from 2.7% to 5.7% at 5 years. Patient satisfaction rates are consistently high, with 85% to 95% reporting good to excellent aesthetic outcomes. Volume replacement techniques using acellular dermal matrix show promising results, with one study reporting that 94% of patients were highly satisfied with cosmetic outcomes. Although the current results are encouraging, future advancements in OBCS may require innovative approaches, including the integration of robotic surgery and artificial intelligence technologies.

The Local Rhombus-Shaped Flap-An Easy and Reliable Technique for Oncoplastic Breast Cancer Surgery and Defect Closure in Breast and Axilla.

Primarily, breast-conserving therapy is an oncological intervention, but eventually it is judged by its cosmetic result. Remaining cavities from tumor resection can promote seromas, delay healing and cause lasting discomfort. Additionally, volume loss, dislocation of nipple/areola and fat necrosis lead to (cosmetically) unfavorable results, aggravated by radiotherapy. Oncoplastic surgery can reduce these sequelae. A local flap that has rarely been used in breast cancer surgery is the Limberg rhombic flap. The tumor defect is planned as a rhombus. The sides of the rhombus are of equal length and ideally have an angle of 60° and 120°. The flap that closes the defect is planned as an extension of equal length of the short diagonal. The second incision of the flap is placed according to the defect angle of 60°, running parallel to the defect at the same length. This creates a second rhombus. The flap is transposed into the defect, and the donor area is primarily closed. It is axially perfused and safe with a 1:1 length-to-width ratio. Compared to local perforator flaps, defect closure is easily managed without microsurgical skills. In the breast, the flap can be used in volume replacement and volume displacement techniques as an all-layer flap to cover defects, or it can be deepithelialized and buried. In the axilla, it can cover full-thickness defects when skin is involved. The advantages of the rhombic flap are its safety and simplicity to add volume and close defects, thus reducing the complexity of oncoplastic surgery.

Pedicled Descending Branch Latissimus Dorsi Mini-Flap For Breast Reconstruction: Shoulder Functional and Aesthetic Outcomes

Abstract Background The cosmetic drawbacks of BCT are asymmetry, nipple or skin retraction, and volume loss which results in an unsatisfactory cosmetic outcome. Therefore, many volume replacement techniques were invented to counteract this. The commonest volume replacement technique for breast reconstruction is autologous LD flap in which skin paddle and subcutaneous tissue are harvested with the flap resulting in increased donor site morbidity. Objective To evaluate the latissimus dorsi mini-flap (LDMF) regarding the cosmetic outcomes and patient satisfaction. Moreover, it will evaluate procedure related complications and the benefit of using this procedure as a volume replacement to large breast defect after wide local excision in different breast quadrants excluding the lower inner quadrant (LIQ). Patients and Methods Our study was conducted on 15 patients to evaluate post-operative complications and patient satisfaction primarily. The results have demonstrated the safety of this procedure which is associated with a low rate of complications. Our study was designed to assess breast-sparing approaches using LD mini flap (LDMF) for reconstruction of the breast after wide local excision of large breast tumors that would result in otherwise unacceptable deformity. Results The LDMF generally is not a time-consuming technique as the average operative time was generally less than three hours. This time included the time for resection and the time waiting for frozen section results. The LDMF reconstruction was associated with considerable sensory preservation. This technique not only preserves most of the breast tissue but also, it spares us doing additional procedures such as nipple reconstruction. Avoidance the use of an implant is an additional advantage to the LDMF as this decrease the rate of infection and decrease the cost of the procedure. Conclusion LDMF volume replacement extends the role of breast-conserving surgery to a group of patients who are traditionally offered mastectomy. Despite the increasing use of Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, some patients have a disease that fails to respond or extensive DCIS and can, therefore, benefit from this oncoplastic technique. Frozen-section analysis of the tumor cavity is essential for surgical decision making. Our study had demonstrated the safety of this procedure which is associated with a low rate of complications. This technique has a high patient satisfaction rate wit agreeable cosmetic outcome. This technique can be used as a volume replacement to large breast defect in different breast quadrant except in lower inner quadrant which was not included in this study.

Oncoplastic Breast-Conserving Surgery in African Women: A Systematic Review.

Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in women worldwide. Surgery is a major treatment modality for breast cancer, and over the years, breast-conserving surgeries with breast radiation have shown similar outcomes with mastectomy. Not much is known about the frequency and outcome of breast-conserving surgery in Africa. This systematic review provides a comprehensive summary of the evidence evaluating cosmetic and oncologic outcomes after oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery (OBCS) for breast cancer in African women. This review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Databases were systematically searched for studies on African women undergoing OBCS. The oncologic and cosmetic outcomes, as well as the localization and reconstruction techniques, were evaluated. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the frequency and proportions of the extracted variables. The literature search yielded 266 articles but only 26 of these were included in the review. Majority of the studies were from Egypt and South Africa. These studies collectively evaluated 1,896 patients with a mean age of 48.2 years and a mean follow-up period of 36.9 months. The most common histopathology was T2 (71.4%) invasive ductal carcinoma. Hook wire localization was the most common technique used for nonpalpable lesions in 85.3% of patients. Of the studies reporting oncoplastic technique, the latissimus dorsi volume replacement technique was the most reported (15%). Most patients were satisfied with their cosmetic outcome. Seroma was the most common postoperative complication (44.6%). Among studies that reported oncologic outcome data, the crude overall survival and disease-free survival were 93.1% and 89.4%, respectively. This systematic review revealed that the outcome of OBCS in African women compares with that in developed countries.

Combining Wise-pattern Volume Displacement and Autologous Volume Replacement to Facilitate Oncoplastic Breast Conservation

Background: Oncoplastic breast conservation has been classically divided into volume displacement (VD) or volume replacement (VR) techniques. There have been few descriptions of merging these two approaches. This report describes our experience combining Wise-pattern VD and autologous VR to repair extensive partial mastectomy defects in patients with ptosis. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed for patients who underwent combined Wise-pattern VD surgery and autologous VR by the author from June 2017 to June 2023, with at least 6 months follow-up. Patient demographics, oncological and intraoperative details, and complications were recorded. Results: Forty patients underwent Wise-pattern VD surgery combined with a medial intercostal artery perforator flap (five patients), lateral thoracic artery perforator/lateral intercostal artery perforator flap (18 patients), anterior intercostal artery perforator flap (five patients), or muscle-sparing latissimus dorsi flap (12 patients). The average tumor size was 4.0 cm (range, 1.5–9.1 cm), and specimen weight was 152 g (range, 33–415 g). Six patients (15%) required re-operation for positive margins. There was delayed healing of three (7.5%) donor sites. There were no flap failures. Two (5%) patients had clinically apparent fat necrosis without requirement for surgical revision. Conclusions: This report demonstrates the feasibility of combining Wise-pattern VD and autologous VR. We propose that oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery be no longer divided into two mutually exclusive approaches and that surgeons make liberal use of combining these approaches to address challenging cases of breast-conserving surgery.

Current practice and provision of oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery in the UK: results of the ANTHEM national practice questionnaire.

Oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery (OPBCS) may be a better option than mastectomy ± immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) for women with breast cancer but studies directly comparing the techniques are lacking. We surveyed UK breast units to determine the current practice of OPBCS to inform the design of a future comparative study. An electronic survey was developed to explore the current practice of OPBCS. This included the local availability of volume displacement and/or replacement techniques; number of cases performed; contraindications and approach to contralateral symmetrisation. Summary data for each survey item were calculated and overall provision of care examined. 58 UK centres completed the survey, including 43 (74%) stand-alone breast and 15 (26%) combined breast/plastics units. Over 40% of units (n = 24) treated more than 500 cancers/year. Most units offered volume displacement techniques (TMs) (97%). Over two-thirds (n = 39. 67%) of units offered local perforator flaps (LPF). Approximately a half of units (10/19) not performing LPF were planning to introduce them in the next 12-24months. A third (n = 19, 33%) of units routinely performed simultaneous contralateral symmetrisation mostly with two-surgeon operating. There were limited oncological restrictions to OPBCS with no contraindications for multifocal cancers in most centres; 65% of units (36/55) offered OPBCS for multicentric disease. Extensive DCIS was a contraindication in a minority of units. OPBCS is widely available in the UK but contraindications and approaches to contralateral symmetrisation were variable. Work is now needed to prospectively evaluate the outcomes of OPBCS vs mastectomy ± IBR to support informed decision-making.

Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy in Oncoplastic Breast Surgery: A Comparison of Outcomes.

A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent oncoplastic breast surgery with and without ciNPT in a single health system over 6 years. Oncoplastic breast surgery was defined as breast conservation surgery involving partial mastectomy with immediate volume displacement or replacement techniques. Primary outcomes were rates of clinically significant complications requiring either medical or operative intervention, including seroma, hematoma, fat necrosis, wound dehiscence, and infection. Secondary outcomes were rates of minor complications. ciNPT was used in 75 patients; standard postsurgical dressing was used in 142 patients. Mean age (P = 0.73) and Charlson Comorbidity Index (P = 0.11) were similar between the groups. The ciNPT cohort had higher baseline BMIs (28.23 ± 4.94 versus 30.55 ± 6.53; P = 0.004), ASA levels (2.35 ± 0.59 versus 2.62 ± 0.52; P = 0.002), and preoperative macromastia symptoms (18.3% versus 45.9%; P ≤ 0.001). The ciNPT cohort had statistically significant lower rates of clinically relevant complications (16.9% versus 5.3%; P = 0.016), the number of complications (14.1% versus 5.3% with one complication, 2.8% versus 0% with >2; P = 0.044), and wound dehiscence (5.6% versus 0%; P = 0.036). The use of ciNPT reduces the overall rate of clinically relevant postoperative complications, including wound dehiscence. The ciNPT cohort had higher rates of macromastia symptoms, BMI, and ASA, all of which put them at increased risk for complications. Therefore, ciNPT should be considered in the oncoplastic population, especially in those patients with increased risk for postoperative complications.

Application of volume replacement techniques in breast conserving surgery for breast cancer treatment

Objective: To examine the application of volume replacement techniques in breast conserving surgery for breast cancer. Methods: The clinic data of 76 breast cancer patients underwent a breast conserving surgery with volume replacement techniques at the Breast Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital, from June 2019 to June 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. All patients were female, aged (42.6±6.4) years (range: 32 to 56 years). Tumor staging inlcuded stage ⅡA in 36 cases, stage ⅡB in 24 cases, stage ⅢA in 12 cases, stage ⅢB in 4 cases. Three types of techniques included the lateral thoracic adipofascial flaps in 47 cases, the upper abdominal wall adipofascial flaps in 22 cases and the latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap in 7 cases. The specimen volume of tumor expansion resection in breast conserving surgery was measured, while the operative time used for volume replacement techniques, postoperative drainage retention time, postoperative complications and patients' satisfaction with the breast shape were recorded. Results: The specimen volume of tumor was (100.9±24.2) ml (range: 55 to 157 ml) in lateral thoracic adipofascial flap group, (88.4±14.5) ml (67 to 118 ml) in upper abdominal wall adipofascial flap group, (179.7±22.9) ml (range: 155 to 220 ml) in latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap group. The operative time used to restore the breast shape of the three groups were (52.9±9.0) minutes (range: 45 to 70 minutes), (63.2±8.8) minutes (range: 50 to 70 minutes) and (99.3±3.4) minutes (range: 95 to 105 minutes), respectively. The postoperative drainage retention times of the three groups were (8.6±1.2) days (range: 7 to 10 days), (9.4±0.9) days (range: 8 to 10 days) and (11.4±1.3) days (range: 10 to 13 days), respectively. All the 76 patients were evaluated for their satisfaction with the cosmetic outcomes, 64 patients (84.2%) were strongly satisfied and 12 patients (15.8%) were generally satisfied. The postoperative complications included fat liquefaction in 6 cases (2 cases in the lateral thoracic adipofascial flap group and 4 cases in the upper abdominal adipofascial flap group) and seroma in 4 cases (each 2 cases in the lateral thoracic adipofascial flap group and the latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap group). Conclusions: For patients with large tissue loss during breast conserving surgery, the corresponding volume replacement techniques, including lateral thoracic adipofascial flaps, upper abdominal wall adpofascial flaps and latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flaps, should be reasonably selected for repair according to the tumor site and the size of the intraoperative breast loss, which can ensure the original volume and shape of the breast, with controllable postoperative complications.

Comparison of Quality of Life and Cosmetic Outcome of Latissimus Dorsi Mini-Flap With Breast Conservation Surgery Without Reconstruction.

Latissimus dorsi mini-flap (LDMF) reconstruction after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is a useful volume replacement technique when a large tumor is located in the upper or outer portion of the breast. However, few studies have reported the impact of LDMF on patients' quality of life (QoL) and cosmesis compared with conventional BCS. We identified patients who underwent BCS with or without LDMF between 2010 and 2020 at a single center. At least 1 year after surgery, we prospectively administered the BREAST-Q to assess QoL and obtained the patients' breast photographs. The cosmetic outcome was assessed using four panels composed of physicians and the BCCT.core software. A total of 120 patients were enrolled, of whom 62 and 58 underwent LDMF or BCS only, respectively. The LDMF group had significantly larger tumors, shorter nipple-to-tumor distances in preoperative examinations, and larger resected breast volumes than did the BCS-only group (p < 0.001). The questionnaires revealed that QoL was poorer in the LDMF group, particularly in terms of the physical well-being score (40.9 vs. 20.1, p < 0.001). Notably, the level of patients' cosmetic satisfaction with their breasts was comparable, and the cosmetic evaluation was assessed by panels and the BCCT.core software showed no differences between the groups. Our results showed that cosmetic outcomes of performing LDMF are comparable to those of BCS alone while having the advantage of resecting larger volumes of breast tissue. Therefore, for those who strongly wish to preserve the cosmesis of their breasts, LDMF can be considered a favorable surgical option after the patient is oriented toward the potential for physical dysfunction after surgery.

Surgical Outcomes Following Partial Breast Reconstruction with Chest Wall Perforator Flaps

Introduction: In the last two decades, chest wall perforator flaps (CWPF) have become a versatile tissue replacement technique for partial breast reconstruction following breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in well-selected cases. We present the surgical outcome of 81 patients with chest wall perforator flaps used for breast-conserving surgery. Methods: We recorded the outcomes of three oncoplastic breast surgeons who performed partial breast reconstruction with chest wall perforator flaps from 1st January 2018 to 30th June 2022 at Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. Data were collected on patient demographics, including age, BMI, smoking status, bra size, previous treatments, type of CWPF procedure, tumor size (measured clinically, via imaging and histologically), biopsy results, specimen weight, margins involvement, re-operation rate, surgical site infection (SSI), flap loss, flap shrinkage, hematoma, and seroma rates. Results: A total of 81 patients were included in this study, with an average age of 55.7 years and a body mass index (BMI) of 26.7 kg/m2. The bra size varied between A to FF with A (7.4%), B (28.3%), C (38.2%), D (13.6%), DD (11.1%), and FF (1.2%). 14.8% of the patients had neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). For 45 patients, LICAP (lateral intercostal artery perforator), 16 AICAP (anterior intercostal artery perforator), 13 MICAP (medial intercostal artery perforator), and for seven patients, LTAP (lateral thoracic artery perforator) flaps were used. The average tumor was measured at 15.75 mm clinically, 19.1 mm via imaging, and 19.6 mm histologically. Biopsy showed that 16% of the tumors were ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), and 84% were invasive. 16% of patients had involved margins, and re-excision was required in 10 patients, and completion mastectomy was performed in 2 patients. A thirty-day SSI rate was 6.2%, with flap-related complications, including flap loss and shrinkage, at 3.7% and 4.9%, respectively. In addition, 3.7% had a hematoma, and 17.3% had other complications. Conclusion: Partial breast reconstruction with perforator flaps is an excellent volume replacement technique in breast-conserving surgery with acceptable complications in well-selected cases.

VALORIZATION OF DIVERSE SIZES OF COAL BOTTOM ASH AS FINE AGGREGATE IN THE PERFORMANCE OF LIGHTWEIGHT FOAMED CONCRETE

In recent years, research work on the use of coal bottom ash (CBA) as a partial alternative for aggregate in concrete is on the rise. This research is aimed at examining the characteristics of lightweight foamed concrete with CBA as fine aggregate to produce environmentally sustainable product. With the volume replacement technique, CBA was used as 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% replacement for conventional mining sand with different sieve sizes of smaller than 4.75, 2.36, and 0.6 mm in concrete. Water absorption, porosity as well as mechanical characteristics tests, including compressive strength, splitting tensile strength, and modulus of elasticity (MOE) were conducted and analyzed. X-ray diffraction and scanning electron microscopy microstructural investigations were also performed to correlate test results. The quality of concrete was investigated using a non-destructive ultrasonic pulse velocity test. According to the findings, the highest replacement level of CBA with a sieve size smaller than 0.6 mm had an impact in reducing workability. The effect of CBA particles on water absorption, MOE, compressive strength, and tensile strength depends on the size of the fine aggregate, the replacement ratio and the density. In general, substituting mining sand with CBA aggregate improved the mechanical performance of concrete, notably for the aggregate size of less than 0.6 mm. Moreover, the SEM images indicate that the addition of CBA particles decreased the size and quantity of voids in the foamed concrete.

An analysis of complication rates and the influence on patient satisfaction and cosmetic outcomes following oncoplastic breast surgery

This study aimed to evaluate complication rates, patient satisfaction, and cosmetic outcomes after oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery (OPS). Furthermore, outcome differences between volume displacement and volume replacement techniques and the effect of postoperative complications on outcomes were evaluated. This was a prospective single-center study addressing patients who underwent OPS from 2017 to 2020. The BREAST-Q was used to measure patient satisfaction, and cosmetic outcomes were assessed by patient self-evaluation and panel evaluation based on medical photographs. A total of 75 patients were included. The overall complication rate was 18.7%, of which 4% required invasive interventions. Median BREAST-Q scores ranged from 56 to 100 and cosmetic outcomes were scored good to excellent in 60-86%. No differences in complications were observed between volume replacement and volume displacement techniques. Following volume displacement techniques, patients-reported higher BREAST-Q scores for the domain "physical well-being of the chest" and lower cosmetic outcomes scores for "mammary symmetry." Patients with complications scored significantly lower on several domains of the BREAST-Q and in various cosmetic outcome categories. In this cohort, an overall complication rate of 18.7% was observed. Patients were generally satisfied, and most cosmetic outcomes were good to excellent. Volume displacement or replacement techniques were performed for different indications and generally showed comparable results. Expected differences in physical discomfort and symmetry between both techniques were observed. In addition, the occurrence of complications resulted in lower patient satisfaction and cosmetic outcomes. These findings emphasize the importance of thorough preoperative counselling.

Bilateral oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery with volume replacement technique using the omental flap: a case report

BackgroundMany oncoplastic volume replacement techniques have been reported, however, it is generally difficult to utilize a single distant flap for bilateral breast carcinomas.Case presentationWe report a case of bilateral multiple breast carcinomas successfully treated with immediate volume replacement technique with an omental flap. Bilateral partial mastectomies were performed for bilateral breast carcinomas (one in the left breast and two in the right breast). The pedicled omental flap was laparoscopically harvested, and divided at the mid-portion of the flap. The proximal half of the flap was used to fill the right defect, and the distal half of the flap filled two defects in the left breast. Cosmetic outcome was excellent with minimal donor-site scars.ConclusionsThe omental flap can be considered for highly selected patients with bilateral breast carcinomas.

Oncoplastic breast reconstruction: Principles, current techniques, and future directions.

Oncoplastic breast reconstruction has improved esthetic results after breast-conserving surgery with low complication rates and stable oncologic outcomes. Basic principles can be applied across different volume displacement and replacement techniques including restoration of breast shape and symmetry through esthetic incisions while eliminating dead space. Technique selection is guided by several factors including breast size, resection-to-breast ratio, and patient desires. A surgeon familiar with all techniques will allow individualization of treatment and optimization of outcomes.

Abstract P3-18-14: Assessment of quality of life and objective cosmetic outcome of breast conserving surgery with or without latissimus dorsi mini-flap in breast cancer

Abstract Introduction : Latissimus dorsi mini-flap (LDMF) with breast conserving surgery (BCS) was introduced as a useful volume replacement technique when the tumor is located in upper or outer portion of breast and the tumor size is large requiring extensive excision of breast tissue. However few studies have assessed quality of life (QoL) and objective cosmetic outcome of LDMF in breast cancer surgery. We tried to evaluate those in patients who underwent BCS with or without LDMF. Methods : This study was a prospective, single-center cohort study of patients who underwent LDMF and BCS between 2011 and 2018. As a control, patients who underwent BCS without any volume replacement and the tumor size equal to or greater than 2.5cm on the upper or upper outer of the breast on preoperative imaging. Breast Q questionnaire and body photo were taken at least 1 year after surgery. Two breast surgeons and one plastic surgeon who did not performed LDMF assessed the cosmetic outcome of the patients with photo. Results : 62 patients were in the BCS with LDMF group and 58 patients were in BCS-only group. Pathologic tumor size was significantly larger in LDMF group than BCS-only group (LDMF 3.89cm vs BCS-only 2.92cm, p= 0.001 ). Psychosocial well-being (P= 0.024), physical well-being (P= 0.000), and satisfaction with surgeon (p= 0.006) were significantly better in the BCS-only group than in the LDMF group respectively. But, there were no significant difference in neither sexual well-being (p= 0.286) nor satisfaction for breast (p=0.278) between BCS and LDMF group. In the physicians assessment, there was no significant difference in the cosmetic outcome score between the two groups (LDMF 2.56/4 vs. BCS-only 2.58/4, p= 0.884). Conclusion : In conclusion, physician assessed cosmetic outcome of LDMF was equivalent to that of BCS without LDMF although the tumor size was significantly larger in patients with LDMF. Some inferiority of QoL might be due to postoperative pain or arm movement discomfort. We are planning to evaluate objective cosmetic results using BCCT.core software. Citation Format: Jang-il Kim, Yireh Han, Changjin Lim, Jong-Ho Cheun, Ji Gwang Jung, Hong Kyu Kim, Han-Byoel Lee, Hyeong-Gon Moon, Wonshik Han. Assessment of quality of life and objective cosmetic outcome of breast conserving surgery with or without latissimus dorsi mini-flap in breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-18-14.

Reliability of Oncoplastic Breast Conserving Surgery for Management of Early Breast Cancer in Yemeni Patients

Background: Oncoplastic breast conserving surgery is limited in treatment of Yemeni breast cancer. The aim of this study is to evaluate the reliability and safety of oncoplastic breast surgery in Yemeni patients with early breast cancer. Material &amp; Methods: Patients with early breast cancer who underwent oncoplastic breast conserving surgery from July 2014 to July 2020 were included in this retrospective study. Data on the patient’s demographic, tumor characteristics, the type of oncoplastic technique performed, surgical margin involved, re-excision rate, complications, satisfaction, follow up and local recurrence rate were included to evaluate the results. Results: A total of 50 breast cancer patients underwent oncoplastic surgery by using different techniques. Volume displacement technique was the commonest technique used in 92% of the patients (local glandular flap in 64%, reduction mammoplasty in 22%, Grissoti flap in 4% and bat-wing in 2%) While the volume replacement (Latissmus dorsi flap) technique was used in 8 % of the patients with small breasts. 70% of the patients were less than 40 years old. The mean tumor size was 3.4cm. Most of the tumors (84%) was invasive ductal carcinoma. The overall postoperative complication was 14% [wound infection (4%), wound dehiscence (8%) and fat necrosis (2%)]. Re excision rate was 12% and complete mastectomy was performed for 2 patients. Patient satisfaction was 96%. Local recurrence rate was 4% with mean follow up of 23.1 (SD:16) months.Conclusion: The oncoplastic breast conserving surgery is reliable and safe with good oncological and aesthetic outcomes for treatment of early breast cancer in Yemeni patients.

Modification of oncoplastic breast surgery with immediate volume replacement using a thoracodorsal adipofascial flap

BackgroundThe treatment of early breast cancer using breast conservation therapy (BCT) commonly ensures local control and acceptable cosmetic results. We report a useful technique including the use of a thoracodorsal adipofascial cutaneous flap for reconstructing defects in the outer quadrant area after partial mastectomy, which achieved excellent results.MethodsDuring the past 15 years, some modifications have been added to the original method at a rate of one modification every 2–5 years. We classified these modifications into the original method and four modified methods. Modification I: addition of a crescent-shaped dermis on the distant edge of the thoracodorsal adipofascial flap (TDAFF), Modification II: addition of a crescent-shaped dermis on the proximal edge of the TDAFF, Modification III: addition of inframammary formation plus Modification II, and Modification IV: change of a crescent-shaped dermis to a Benz-shaped (shaped like the Mercedes Benz logo) one plus Modification III. We compared the plastic period, postoperative complications, oncological results, and cosmetic results among the original and four modified groups.ResultsThe patient number was 26, 9, 15, 23, and 10 in the original and Modification I, II, III, and IV groups, respectively. The median observation period was 115, 92, 67, 51, and 32 months, respectively. Postoperative complications were seen in 5 (19%), 0, 2 (13%), 1 (5%), and 0 patients, respectively. Local recurrence was seen in 3 (12%), 0, 0, 0, and 0 patients, respectively. Distant recurrence was seen in 1 (4%), 1 (11%), 3 (20%), 0, and 0 patients, respectively. Cosmetic results evaluated as good–excellent were seen in 19 (73%), 5 (56%), 11 (73%), 19 (83%), and 10 (100%) patients, respectively.ConclusionsOncoplastic surgery using an immediate volume replacement technique with a thoracodorsal adipofascial flap was improved by adding some modifications.