A multidisciplinary study, including stratigraphic, sedimentological, biostratigraphic, petrographic, magnetic fabric and SEM analyses, has been performed on six volcaniclastic layers (VLs) interbedded in the Burdigalian shelf succession of the Monferrato (NW Italy). The aim was to distinguish between the volcanic and sedimentary processes that produced these deposits, to suggest a depositional model for volcaniclastic sedimentation in a shelf environment and to discuss the use of VLs for stratigraphic correlations. Two kinds of VLs have been distinguished: single volcaniclastic layers (SVLs) and multiple volcaniclastic layers (MVLs). SVLs are single beds of well sorted vitric siltites, mainly consisting of volcanic components and minor terrigenous and intrabasinal grains; the vitric fraction mainly consists of blocky fragments. They show a very low magnetic anisotropy degree and a prominent magnetic lineation. These VLs are interbedded in outer shelf marls and are interpreted as primary pyroclastic fall deposits. MVLs, which can be up to 10 m thick, show limited lateral continuity and are made up of several-decimetre-thick graded beds, separated by erosional surfaces and consisting of vitric arenites and siltites with about 15% non-volcanic components. Two kinds of MVLs have been distinguished: (1) Type 1 MVLs, interbedded in storm-dominated glaucony-rich calcarenites and showing rough, low-angle cross-stratification (hummocky cross stratification), water escape and load structures. These deposits are characterized by a slightly foliated magnetic fabric and are interpreted as storm layers, deposited between fairweather and storm wave base. (2) Type 2 MVLs are interbedded in outer shelf marls, and are characterized by parallel lamination and by a well developed magnetic foliation. They are interpreted as storm-induced, distal shelf turbidites, triggered by storm activity acting in the more internal part of the shelf. The Monferrato VLs resulted from explosive eruptions of volcanic edifices, located outside of the basin, that produced an extensive tuff blanket that was uniformly distributed on a carbonate-dominated shelf. Above storm wave base the VLs were immediately reworked by storm activity, and the resulting deposits are type 1 MVLs. Below storm wave base, primary pyroclastic fall deposits were preserved, corresponding to SVLs. Storm-induced turbidity currents gave rise to type 2 MVLs, that were deposited below storm wave base. Preservation of VLs in a shelf environment is hampered by the high-energy conditions of the shelf. Consequently, these deposits are characterized by a restricted lateral continuity and their use as correlation tools may be misleading.
Read full abstract