I was astonished to come across an article in the August issue of Parasitology Today entitled `Why does Plasmodium have a pre-erythrocytic cycle?', by T.V. Rajan[1xRajan, T.V. Parasitol. Today. 1997; 13: 284–286Abstract | Full Text PDF | PubMedSee all References[1], along with `A response', by J.A. Stoute et al.[2xStoute, J.A. et al. Parasitol. Today. 1997; 13: 286–287Abstract | Full Text PDFSee all References[2] My surprise was due to the use of the word `cycle' in connection with the pre-erythrocytic (hepatic) stage of Plasmodium infection, as this hypothetical concept, originally used to explain malarial relapse[3xShortt, H.E. and Garnham, P.C.C. Nature. 1948; 161: 126Crossref | PubMedSee all References[3], is now outdated and incorrect. In the simplest terms, the immediate answer to the title question is `It doesn't.'Despite T.V. Rajan's assertion that `multiple rounds (P. vivax) of extra-erythrocytic schizogony [occur] in hepatocytes,' there is no good evidence that such a cycle exists, based on data from multiple experimental sources accumulated by the 1970s and early 1980s. In fact, P.C.C. Garnham himself, one of the two original discoverers of the pre-erythrocytic stage in primate malaria and co-author of the Shortt–Garnham theory of malarial relapse[4xShortt, H.E. and Garnham, P.C.C. Br. Med. J. 1948; 1: 1225–1228Crossref | PubMed | Scopus (27)See all References[4], had clearly identified insurmountable problems with the `cycle' concept as early as 1967 (Ref. [5xGarnham, P.C.C. Protozoology. 1967; 2: 55–64See all References[5]); he later collaborated with myself and others in experiments that finally did identify the true relapse stage, the hypnozoite[6xKrotoski, W.A. et al. Br. Med. J. 1980; 1: 153–154Crossref | Scopus (45)See all References, 7xKrotoski, W.A. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1985; 79: 1–11PubMed | Scopus (21)See all References, 8xKrotoski, W.A. Prog. Clin. Parasitol. 1989; 1: 1–19PubMedSee all References]. This collaboration and the still-current state of knowledge regarding the ontogeny of hepatic stages of primate Plasmodium spp have been reviewed in papers by Krotoski[7xKrotoski, W.A. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1985; 79: 1–11PubMed | Scopus (21)See all References, 8xKrotoski, W.A. Prog. Clin. Parasitol. 1989; 1: 1–19PubMedSee all References] and by Cogswell[9xCogswell, F.B. et al. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1991; 45: 211–213PubMedSee all References, 10xCogswell, F.B. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1992; 5: 26–35PubMedSee all References]. In addition to the capping discovery of the hypnozoite in 1979–1980, the grounds for refutation of the 1948 postulate (ie. the Shortt–Garnham `cycle') include the geographically based disparities observed in P. vivax relapse patterns[11xContacos, P.G. et al. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1972; 21: 707–712PubMedSee all References[11], in particular: the existence of strains consistently exhibiting delayed patency[12xTiburskaya, N.A. Med. Parazit. (Moscow). 1964; 33: 204–216PubMedSee all References[12]; the incompatibility of a `cycle' concept with the latter and with immunologic explanations therefore[13xSee all References[13]; the lack of any direct evidence to support the cycle theory, including the failure to demonstrate any `nests' of maturing tissue schizonts in experimental or clinical pathologic specimens[13xSee all References[13]; the susceptibility of human volunteers with mosquito-transmitted P. vivax infection to superinfection with the homologous strain by blood transfer during latency[14xCooper, W.C. et al. Am. J. Hyg. 1947; 46: 141–148PubMedSee all References[14]; and serologic observations on human P. malariae infection, in which anti-plasmodial antibody levels gradually fell after treatment aimed exclusively at blood stages[15xCollins, W.E. et al. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1964; 13: 1–5PubMedSee all References[15].To base immunologic explanations of the hepatic tropism, behavior and development of pre-erythrocytic stages of Plasmodium on a non-existent `cycle' does not appear appropriate. In other words, although Rajan logically proposes that `by undergoing one or more rounds of replication in the liver, the parasite ensures primary exposure of its antigens to the mammalian immune system', there is simply no evidence to support the idea that the parasite does actually undergo such putative rounds of replication; in fact, the contrary seems to be the case.