Activity Visual Questionnaire Research Articles

Visual function and color vision in adults with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

PurposeColor vision and self-reported visual function in everyday life in young adults with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) were investigated. MethodParticipants were 30 young adults with ADHD and 30 controls matched for age and gender. They were tested individually and completed the Visual Activities Questionnaire (VAQ), Farnsworth-Munsell 100 Hue Test (FMT) and A Quick Test of Cognitive Speed (AQT). ResultsThe ADHD group reported significantly more problems in 4 of 8 areas on the VAQ: depth perception, peripheral vision, visual search and visual processing speed. Further analyses of VAQ items revealed that the ADHD group endorsed more visual problems associated with driving than controls. Color perception difficulties on the FMT were restricted to the blue spectrum in the ADHD group. FMT and AQT results revealed slower processing of visual stimuli in the ADHD group. ConclusionA comprehensive investigation of mechanisms underlying visual function and color vision in adults with ADHD is warranted, along with the potential impact of these visual problems on driving performance.

Visual outcomes and subjective experience after bilateral implantation of a new diffractive trifocal intraocular lens

To assess clinical outcomes and subjective experience after bilateral implantation of a diffractive trifocal intraocular lens (IOL). Midland Eye Institute, Solihull, United Kingdom. Cohort study. Patients had bilateral implantation of Finevision trifocal IOLs. Uncorrected distance visual acuity, corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), and manifest refraction were measured 2 months postoperatively. Defocus curves were assessed under photopic and mesopic conditions over a range of +1.50 to -4.00 diopters (D) in 0.50 D steps. Contrast sensitivity function was assessed under photopic conditions. Halometry was used to measure the angular size of monocular and binocular photopic scotomas arising from a glare source. Patient satisfaction with uncorrected near vision was assessed using the Near Activity Visual Questionnaire (NAVQ). The mean monocular CDVA was 0.08 logMAR ± 0.08 (SD) and the mean binocular CDVA, 0.06 ± 0.08 logMAR. Defocus curve testing showed an extended range of clear vision from +1.00 to -2.50 D defocus, with a significant difference in acuity between photopic conditions and mesopic conditions at -1.50 D defocus only. Photopic contrast sensitivity was significantly better binocularly than monocularly at all spatial frequencies. Halometry showed a glare scotoma of a mean size similar to that in previous studies of multifocal and accommodating IOLs; there were no subjective complaints of dysphotopsia. The mean NAVQ Rasch score for satisfaction with near vision was 15.9 ± 10.7 logits. The trifocal IOL implanted binocularly produced good distance visual acuity and near and intermediate visual function. Patients were very satisfied with their uncorrected near vision.

The Glaucoma Guidelines of the Swedish Ophthalmological Society

The Glaucoma Guidelines of the Swedish Ophthalmological Society

Development of a questionnaire to assess the relative subjective benefits of presbyopia correction

To develop a standardized questionnaire of near visual function and satisfaction to complement visual function evaluations of presbyopic corrections. Eye Clinic, School of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Midland Eye Institute and Solihull Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom. Questionnaire development. A preliminary 26-item questionnaire of previously used near visual function items was completed by patients with monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs), multifocal IOLs, accommodating IOLs, multifocal contact lenses, or varifocal spectacles. Rasch analysis was used for item reduction, after which internal and test-retest reliabilities were determined. Construct validity was determined by correlating the resulting Near Activity Visual Questionnaire (NAVQ) scores with near visual acuity and critical print size (CPS), which was measured using the Minnesota Low Vision Reading Test chart. Discrimination ability was assessed through receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. One hundred fifty patients completed the questionnaire. Item reduction resulted in a 10-item NAVQ with excellent separation (2.92), internal consistency (Cronbach α = 0.95), and test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.72). Correlations of questionnaire scores with near visual acuity (r = 0.32) and CPS (r = 0.27) provided evidence of validity, and discrimination ability was excellent (area under ROC curve = 0.91). Results show the NAVQ is a reliable, valid instrument that can be incorporated into the evaluation of presbyopic corrections.

A Head-to-Head Comparison of 16 Cataract Surgery Outcome Questionnaires

To investigate the responsiveness of 16 questionnaires used in cataract surgery outcomes. Prospective, observational study. Patients at the Ophthalmology Eye Clinic, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, Australia, and 1 matched eye clinic in Sweden. Sixteen Rasch-scaled cataract surgery questionnaires were completed before and 6 months after surgery. These were: the Cataract Symptom Scale, 6 versions of the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire, the Quality of Life and Vision Function Questionnaire, the Cataract TyPE Specification, the Visual Activities Questionnaire, the Visual Disability Assessment (VDA), the Visual Function and Quality of Life questionnaire, the Visual Function Index, Catquest-9SF, the Visual Symptoms and Quality of Life questionnaire, and the Cataract Outcomes Questionnaire. Responsiveness was calculated with the effect size (ES) statistic (change in questionnaire score divided by pooled standard deviation of the preoperative and postoperative scores). Questionnaire responsiveness to cataract surgery (ability to detect clinically important change). All 16 questionnaires and their subscales were responsive to cataract surgery, with visual functioning scales being more responsive than socioemotional scales and some subscales being less responsive. The largest ES was for the Catquest-9SF (1.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.22-1.67), which was the only instrument with a mean and 95% CI of more than 1.0 (very large ES). Three measures had very large ESs and 95% CIs of more than 0.80 (large ES): the VDA (activity limitations and subscale) and the Cataract Outcomes Questionnaire, although their 95% CIs overlapped with a number of other instruments. The Catquest-9SF is short and highly responsive to cataract surgery, and so is ideal for measuring visual functioning outcomes. Other instruments may be preferred to measure different constructs. The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Use of a Novel Power Mapping Technique to Evaluate Multifocal Contact Lens Designs

To determine the utility of a range of clinical and non-clinical indicators to aid the initial selection of the optimum presbyopic contact lens. In addition, to assess whether lens preference was influenced by the visual performance compared to the other designs trialled (intra-subject) or compared to participants who preferred other designs (inter-subject).A double-masked randomised crossover trial of Air Optix Aqua multifocal, PureVision 2 for Presbyopia, Acuvue OASYS for Presbyopia, Biofinity multifocal and monovision was conducted on 35 presbyopes (54.3 ± 6.2 years). Participant lifestyle, personality, pupil characteristics and aberrometry were assessed prior to lens fitting. After 4 weeks of wear, high and low contrast visual acuity (VA) under photopic and mesopic conditions, reading speed, Near Activity Visual Questionnaire (NAVQ) rating, subjective quality-of-vision scoring, defocus curves, stereopsis, halometry, aberrometry and ocular physiology were quantified.After trialling all the lenses, preference was mixed (n = 12 Biofinity, n = 10 monovision, n = 7 Purevision, n = 4 Air Optix Aqua, n = 2 Oasys). Lens preference was not dependent on personality (F = 1.182, p = 0.323) or the hours spent working at near (p = 0.535) or intermediate (p = 0.759) distances. No intersubject or strong intrasubject relationships emerged between lens preference and reading speed, NAVQ rating, halo size, aberrometry or ocular physiology (p > 0.05).Participant lifestyle and personality, ocular optics, contact lens visual performance and ocular physiology provided poor indicators of the preferred lens type after 4 weeks of wear. This is confounded by the wide range of task visual demands of presbyopes and the limited optical differences between current multifocal contact lens designs.

Visual Activities Questionnaire: Assessment of subscale validity for cataract surgery outcomes

To examine the psychometric properties of the Visual Activities Questionnaire (VAQ) and each of its subscales in a modern cataract population using Rasch analysis and if flawed, to revise the VAQ and create a valid measure that maximizes its measurement properties. Flinders Eye Centre, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, Australia. Patients with cataract in 1 or both eyes drawn from the surgical waiting list were mailed the 33-item VAQ for self-administration. The following were examined for the entire questionnaire and each subscale: whether items measured a single construct (unidimensionality), the behavior of response categories, the ability to differentiate between patients' visual abilities (person separation), matching of item difficulty to participant ability (targeting), and whether items function similarly across subgroups of participants (differential item functioning [DIF]). The VAQ was completed by 561 patients. Response categories were used as intended. The VAQ discriminated the visual ability of the population (person separation, 4.88) but had suboptimum targeting, misfitting items, significant multidimensionality, DIF, and 4 dysfunctional subscales. Elimination of items causing multidimensionality resulted in a reduced 13-item VAQ that met all validity criteria for satisfactory instrument performance. Only 1 valid subscale (peripheral vision) could be preserved in the 13-item VAQ. The VAQ in its native form was multidimensional and contained subscales with poor psychometric properties. The revised unidimensional 13-item VAQ was more appropriate for application in cataract outcomes assessment. Ideally, more items should be included to improve the targeting of item difficulty to more able cataract patients.

Contrasting the Use of 2 Vision-specific Quality of Life Questionnaires in Subjects With Open-angle Glaucoma

To compare 2 vision-specific functional status measures to each other and to clinical parameters in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study (CIGTS). CIGTS participants completed the Visual Activities Questionnaire (VAQ) and the National Eye Institute-Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ) and were tested for visual field (VF) and visual acuity (VA). In all, 426 subjects contributed the VAQ and NEI-VFQ scores at 54 months. Pearson correlations were used to assess associations. The VAQ subscales (range, 0 to 100) that assessed light-dark adaptation (mean=66.1), glare disability (66.4), and acuity/spatial vision (67.7) indicated vision-related functions that CIGTS participants found most difficult. On the NEI-VFQ, subjects reported high levels of visual functioning, with mean >/=90 (out of 100) on the total score and in 9 of 12 subscales. General vision (mean=82.6) received the lowest subscale score. Two subscales common to both questionnaires were highly correlated: VA (r=0.68) and peripheral vision (r=0.77) (both P<0.0001). Correlations between participants' perceptions and clinical measures of visual function were in the expected direction, but weaker. Stronger associations were found between clinical measures and the NEI-VFQ than the VAQ. Better eye VF and worse eye VA had the highest number of significant correlations with subjects' perceptions of their visual function. Increasing VF loss was associated with a significant decrease in the overall and peripheral vision subscale scores from both questionnaires, and also several other subscales. CIGTS patients reported excellent visual function on both the NEI-VFQ and VAQ. These findings will help researchers interested in assessing patients' perceptions of their visual function make an informed selection when choosing between the VAQ and the NEI-VFQ.

Evaluating Clinical Change and Visual Function Concerns in Drivers and Nondrivers with Glaucoma

To compare drivers and nondrivers, and to describe the specific concerns of drivers, among individuals with glaucoma. Six hundred seven patients with newly diagnosed glaucoma treated at 14 clinical centers of the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study were randomly assigned to initial medicine or surgery and were followed up every 6 months. Driving status (drivers versus nondrivers) and patient-reported visual function were determined by the Visual Activities Questionnaire and the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire. Clinical evaluation included visual field mean deviation (MD) and visual acuity. Statistical comparisons were made using t, chi(2), and exact tests and regression and Rasch analyses. Drivers were more likely than nondrivers to be male, white, married, employed, and more educated and to have higher incomes and fewer comorbidities. More than 50% of drivers reported at least "some" difficulty performing tasks involving glare, whereas 22% reported at least "some" difficulty with tasks requiring peripheral vision. At 54 months, drivers with moderate/severe bilateral visual field loss (VFL) reported greater difficulty with night driving and tasks involving visual search and visual processing speed than drivers with less bilateral VFL (all P<0.05). Although those who remained drivers over follow-up had better MD in both eyes than those who became nondrivers because of eyesight, a number of drivers had marked VFL. Inquiring about specific difficulties with tasks related to glare, visual processing speed, visual search, and peripheral vision in driving, especially among patients with substantial bilateral visual field damage, will enable physicians to more effectively counsel patients regarding driving.

An Interval-Scaled Scoring Algorithm for Visual Function Questionnaires

The primary purpose of the study is to present and test a simple algorithm for scoring visual function questionnaires (VFQs) that approximates person measure estimates from Rasch analysis, does not introduce nonlinearities at extreme scores, and is insensitive to missing data. A secondary purpose is to test the hypothesis that all VFQs measure the same visual ability variable and can be calibrated to a common measurement scale. Each of 407 consecutively recruited low vision patients were administered two of four visual function questionnaires: Activities of Daily Living Scale (ADVS), National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire (NEI VFQ), 14-item Visual Functioning Index (VF-14), Visual Activities Questionnaire (VAQ). Separate Rasch analyses, using the Andrich rating scale model, were performed on responses to each of the four VFQs and again on the merged data of all instruments. An approximation of visual ability, based on average functional reserve and an inverse hyperbolic tangent transformation, is presented and tested by comparing visual ability estimates from the Rasch analyses to corresponding estimates from the approximations. Relative to person measure estimates from Rasch analysis, the approximations were observed to be linear and highly reliable (intraclass correlations ranged from 0.97 to 0.997). The measurement scale of each of the four instruments was observed to be a linear transformation of the measurement scale estimated from the merged responses of all four instruments. The approximation algorithm transforms rating scale responses for each instrument to a common measurement scale. By randomly censuring item responses for each subject, it was demonstrated that the approximation algorithm is robust and insensitive to missing data. A simple scoring algorithm based on an inverse hyperbolic tangent transformation of average functional reserve produces highly reliable approximations of visual ability estimated from Rasch analysis for the ADVS, NEI VFQ, VAQ, and VF-14. All four instruments measure the same visual ability variable in units that can be calibrated to a common measurement scale.

The Activity Inventory: An Adaptive Visual Function Questionnaire

The Activity Inventory (AI) is an adaptive visual function questionnaire that consists of 459 Tasks nested under 50 Goals that in turn are nested under three Objectives. Visually impaired patients are asked to rate the importance of each Goal, the difficulty of Goals that have at least some importance, and the difficulty of Tasks that serve Goals that have both some importance and some difficulty. Consequently, each patient responds to an individually tailored set of questions that provides both a functional history and the data needed to estimate the patient's visual ability. The purpose of the present article is to test the hypothesis that all combinations of items in the AI, and by extension all visual function questionnaires, measure the same visual ability variable. The AI was administered to 1880 consecutively-recruited low vision patients before their first visit to the low vision rehabilitation service. Of this group, 407 were also administered two other visual function questionnaires randomly chosen from among the Activities of Daily Living Scale (ADVS), National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire (NEI VFQ), 14-item Visual Functioning Index (VF-14), and Visual Activities Questionnaire (VAQ). Rasch analyses were performed on the responses to each VFQ, on all responses to the AI, and on responses to various subsets of items from the AI. The pattern of fit statistics for AI item and person measures suggested that the estimated visual ability variable is not unidimensional. Reading-related and other items requiring high visual resolution had smaller residual errors than expected and mobility-related items had larger residual errors than expected. The pattern of person measure residual errors could not be explained by the disorder diagnosis. When items were grouped into subsets representing four visual function domains (reading, mobility, visual motor, visual information), and separate person measures were estimated for each domain as well as for all items combined, visual ability was observed to be equivalent to the first principal component and accounted for 79% of the variance. However, confirmatory factor analysis showed that visual ability is a composite variable with at least two factors: one upon which mobility loads most heavily and the other upon which reading loads most heavily. These two factors can account for the pattern of residual errors. High product moment and intraclass correlations were observed when comparing different subsets of items within the AI and when comparing different VFQs. Visual ability is a composite variable with two factors; one most heavily influences reading function and the other most heavily influences mobility function. Subsets of items within the AI and different VFQs all measure the same visual ability variable.

Depression and Mood Indicators in Newly Diagnosed Glaucoma Patients

To assess depression and mood indicators in subjects newly diagnosed with chronic open-angle glaucoma. Cross-sectional study of data from a randomized clinical trial. Newly-diagnosed glaucoma patients enrolled in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study (CIGTS) responded at baseline to quality-of-life (QOL) telephone interviews. We studied responses to the 33-item Visual Activities Questionnaire (VAQ), six items from a disease-specific Health Perceptions Index (HPI), and eight questions from the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). We correlated the responses to the HPI and the CES-D with visual acuity (VA) and CIGTS visual field (VF) as well as to the responses to the VAQ. VAQ score was correlated (P < .01 in all cases) with better VA (P = -0.181), better VF (P = 0.139), worse VA (P = -0.128), and worse VF (P = .120). There were also correlations (P ranging from .24 to .38, all P values < or = .001) between patients' perception of their vision (total VAQ score) and each item on the HPI and CES-D. None of the clinical vision measures were associated with any of the CES-D items. The strongest correlation between a clinical measure and an item from the HPI was between worse VF and worry about the possibility of blindness (P = -0.114, P = .005). The odds ratio of reporting mood indicators and symptoms of depression increased with patients' perceptions of worsening visual function but not worsening VA or VF. In these newly diagnosed glaucoma patients, symptoms of depression and altered mood were related to worse self-reported visual function as assessed by the VAQ, but not to monocular clinical measures of visual function.

Development of a near activity visual questionnaire to assess accommodating intraocular lenses

Purpose To develop a questionnaire that subjectively assesses near visual function in patients with ‘accommodating’ intraocular lenses (IOLs). Methods A literature search of existing vision-related quality-of-life instruments identified all questions relating to near visual tasks. Questions were combined if repeated in multiple instruments. Further relevant questions were added and item interpretation confirmed through multidisciplinary consultation and focus groups. A preliminary 19-item questionnaire was presented to 22 subjects at their 4-week visit post first eye phacoemulsification with ‘accommodative’ IOL implantation, and again 6 and 12 weeks post-operatively. Rasch Analysis, Frequency of Endorsement, and tests of normality (skew and kurtosis) were used to reduce the instrument. Cronbach's alpha and test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC) were determined for the final questionnaire. Construct validity was obtained by Pearson's product moment correlation (PPMC) of questionnaire scores to reading acuity (RA) and to Critical Print Size (CPS) reading speed. Criterion validity was obtained by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and dimensionality of the questionnaire was assessed by factor analysis. Results Rasch Analysis eliminated nine items due to poor fit statistics. The final items have good separation (2.55), internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.97) and test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.66). PPMC of questionnaire scores with RA was 0.33, and with CPS reading speed was 0.08. Area under the ROC curve was 0.88 and Factor Analysis revealed one principal factor. Conclusion The pilot data indicates the questionnaire to be internally consistent, reliable and a valid instrument that could be useful for assessing near visual function in patients with ‘accommodating’ IOLS. The questionnaire will now be expanded to include other types of presbyopic correction.

Corneal Staining does not affect the Comfort of Soft Contact Lens Wear

To determine the utility of a range of clinical and non-clinical indicators to aid the initial selection of the optimum presbyopic contact lens. In addition, to assess whether lens preference was influenced by the visual performance compared to the other designs trialled (intra-subject) or compared to participants who preferred other designs (inter-subject).A double-masked randomised crossover trial of Air Optix Aqua multifocal, PureVision 2 for Presbyopia, Acuvue OASYS for Presbyopia, Biofinity multifocal and monovision was conducted on 35 presbyopes (54.3 ± 6.2 years). Participant lifestyle, personality, pupil characteristics and aberrometry were assessed prior to lens fitting. After 4 weeks of wear, high and low contrast visual acuity (VA) under photopic and mesopic conditions, reading speed, Near Activity Visual Questionnaire (NAVQ) rating, subjective quality-of-vision scoring, defocus curves, stereopsis, halometry, aberrometry and ocular physiology were quantified.After trialling all the lenses, preference was mixed (n = 12 Biofinity, n = 10 monovision, n = 7 Purevision, n = 4 Air Optix Aqua, n = 2 Oasys). Lens preference was not dependent on personality (F = 1.182, p = 0.323) or the hours spent working at near (p = 0.535) or intermediate (p = 0.759) distances. No intersubject or strong intrasubject relationships emerged between lens preference and reading speed, NAVQ rating, halo size, aberrometry or ocular physiology (p > 0.05).Participant lifestyle and personality, ocular optics, contact lens visual performance and ocular physiology provided poor indicators of the preferred lens type after 4 weeks of wear. This is confounded by the wide range of task visual demands of presbyopes and the limited optical differences between current multifocal contact lens designs.

The Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study: Interim quality of life findings after initial medical or surgical treatment of glaucoma

Objective To present interim quality of life (QOL) findings in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study (CIGTS) using all available follow-up through 5 years from treatment initiation. Design Randomized controlled clinical trial. Participants Six hundred seven newly diagnosed patients with open-angle glaucoma from 14 clinical centers. Intervention Patients were randomly assigned to either initial medical therapy or initial trabeculectomy. After treatment initiation and early follow-up, patients received clinical and QOL evaluations at 6-month intervals. QOL assessments were administered by telephone at a centralized interviewing center. Main outcome measures The CIGTS collected comprehensive QOL information that included both generic and vision-specific QOL measures. This article focuses on initial treatment group differences related to symptom reporting, as measured by a Symptom and Health Problem Checklist, and changes in daily visual functioning, as measured by the Visual Activities Questionnaire (VAQ). Results Across both treatment groups, there was an overall decline in the percent of participants reporting symptoms over time. Of 43 possible symptoms, 12 symptoms were reported with greater frequency by the surgically treated group and 7 symptoms more frequently by the medically-treated group. The surgical patients reported more total Symptom Impact Glaucoma ( P = 0.005) and, in particular, more bother related to local eye symptoms. Very few treatment group differences were noted in visual functioning, although surgical patients reported more problems with activities related to their visual acuity ( P = 0.024). The percentage of patients across treatment groups reporting worry about blindness was 50% at baseline but declined to approximately 25% over time. Conclusions Overall, the QOL impact reported by the two treatment groups as measured by instruments used in this study is remarkably similar, with relatively few significant study group differences observed after up to 5 years of follow-up in the CIGTS. When significant differences in visual function have been detected using the VAQ, they are consistent with the clinical outcomes. To date, the most persistent QOL finding is the increased impact of local eye symptoms reported by the surgical group compared with the medical group. Although no changes are recommended in the treatment of newly diagnosed glaucoma patients at the time of this interim report, further follow-up will allow for more definitive answers to the QOL impact of these two treatment approaches.