Reviewed by: The CIA in Ecuador by Marc Becker Evan C. Rothera Becker, Marc. The CIA in Ecuador. Durham: Duke University Press, 2020. Marc Becker, currently professor of history at Truman State University and a widely respected authority on Ecuador, excels at using underexplored or recently declassified caches of documents to analyze Ecuadorian politics. Becker's The FBI in Latin America (Duke University Press, 2017) skillfully employed [End Page 434] FBI records to illuminate leftist activism in Ecuador. Similarly, The CIA in Ecuador draws on CIA surveillance documents to explore social movement organizing efforts among the Ecuadorian left. This volume is simultaneously a study of Ecuadorian politics, CIA perceptions of the left in Ecuador, and an extended discussion of how surveillance documents reveal much about the subjects of surveillance as well as the people who created the documents. Becker begins with a 1949 radio broadcast of The War of the Worlds in Quito. Sadly, the radio station delayed explaining that the invasion was a hoax. Rioting by angry crowds left more than a dozen people dead. Communists did not have anything to do with the broadcast or the riot, but this did not stop the CIA from assuming that "radicals must have been behind the mayhem" (2). The CIA report about the broadcast and the riot illustrate both "the pervasiveness of US surveillance operations as well as the potential possibilities, boundaries, and obstacles to their knowledge and understanding of leftist movements in Latin America" (2). Although many of the CIA documents about the Ecuadorian left were deeply flawed, they represent one of the few bodies of information available. Used carefully, as Becker does, these sources can illuminate much about Ecuador during the long 1950s, or the end of WWII through the Cuban Revolution. CIA documents, which saw through the world through the lens of the Cold War, often mischaracterized or misunderstood the Ecuadorian left. Some CIA officers feared communists would disrupt society, but the Partido Comunista del Ecuador (PCE) opposed "extraconstitutional alterations in power" (52). The US government's belief that "Moscow gold" funded the PCE was overblown, but it nevertheless produced extensive surveillance of the Ecuadorian left. Despite the flawed nature of the records and the biases of surveillance officers, they nevertheless yield important insights and serve as a crucial lens with which to examine the Ecuadorian left. The CIA's monitoring of Communist Party activities, Becker explains, sometimes produced the only records scholars have about the Ecuadorian left during the 1950s. Ironically, the CIA's obsessive attention to the communists inadvertently created an important record and reminds us that state organizations and actors often preserve traces of the very ideologies, people, and practices they would like to see disappear. Thanks to the CIA's surveillance, scholars have a detailed summary of what happened at the Fifth PCE Congress in 1952, not to mention other moments during this period. CIA surveillance, Becker concludes, "provides scholars with an opportunity to peek [End Page 435] inside communist party structures to understand how militants organized themselves to advance their political agenda" (183). "The 1950s were a period of continual transitions for the communist party in Ecuador" (93) and, ultimately, the "intense and continuing organizing efforts in the years after the Second World War laid the groundwork for subsequent militant mobilizations that would not have happened were in not for those earlier, less visible actions" (5). That CIA surveillance documents illuminating these earlier and less visible actions became such an important source for Becker's narrative is, as stated above, an ironic consequence of the mass of paper generated by extensive surveillance efforts. These records reveal, in extensive although often inaccurate detail, things about both Ecuador and the US. Furthermore, they provide a historian working several generations after their creation with a rich source base to tell the history of the Ecuadorian left during an understudied period. The CIA did not ignore the Western Hemisphere. Ultimately scholars should be thankful they did not, because "CIA surveillance provides insights into the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats that the party confronted. Our understanding of the past is richer for the documentary record they left behind" (25). Once again Marc Becker has taken a trove of...
Read full abstract
Nov 7, 2024
Julio A Ramos Pastrana + 1
Just Published
Open Access