The Good of Authority in the Theology of Matthias Joseph Scheeben Patrick Auer Jones Both polemics against and apologetics on behalf of the living authority of the Catholic Church can hinge on an understanding of authority as mere arbitration. The presence of living human authorities within the Church can be alternatively criticized or justified by appealing to the raw necessity of designating some person or persons to resolve disputes within a diverse and widely extended polity. The aim of this essay is to call into question just such an understanding of authority. In doing so, it will first take up the question of authority from a philosophical vantage, presenting Yves Simon’s defense of authority as a natural human good. Then, it will turn to the theology of Matthias Joseph Scheeben to offer an analysis of the nature of the Church’s authority in light of her character as an agent not only of God’s power, but of God’s truth. The aim will be to produce a positive account of the Church’s authority through the prism of Scheeben’s analysis of theological faith. In the course of the essay, it will be shown that ecclesial authority stands in an analogous relationship to other forms of human authority. At the same time, the Church’s authority must be understood by clarifying the nature of divine faith, and the Church’s role in producing the act of faith. The twentieth-century philosopher Yves Simon provides a philosophical preamble to Scheeben’s account of the living authority of the Church. In his work A General Theory of Authority, Simon remarks: “The issue of authority has such a bad reputation that a philosopher cannot discuss it without exposing himself to suspicion and malice. Yet authority is present in all [End Page 433] phases of social life.”1 Simon notes that authority is construed, particularly in the twentieth century, as an impediment to justice, human vitality, truth, and order.2 A multitude of philosophical theories underlie this resistance to authority, some radically anarchist, but more commonly of a “liberal” variety (e.g., classically liberal views of democracy and of the function of the free market). Yet, Simon argues, “authority is unmistakably present” even in those societies and their systems which claim to be anti-authoritarian.3 In response, he sets out to show why authority is natural when it comes to justice, human vitality, truth, and order, and why it is in fact essential to all of these when understood in its “plurality of functions.”4 Simon takes aim at a view of authority in which “deficiencies alone cause authority to be necessary.”5 According to this view, a gap in the otherwise free-standing vital functions of political or market order demands the heteronomous influence of an authority outside of that system. Or, in matters of judgment, an irresolvable doubt demands that, absent any reasonable criteria for practical judgment, authority should step in arbitrarily: “Not knowing which way to take, but realizing that movement in any clear direction is better than unending idleness, we let authority decide which way we shall take, and we admire its ability to substitute definite action for endless deliberation.”6 Simon only tangentially engages the question of authority as it relates to theology, and does not delve at all into the question of the living authority of the Catholic Church. It is therefore necessary to expand Simon’s theory of authority if we are to apply it to Christianity. Matthias Joseph Scheeben’s analysis of the relationship between the act of supernatural faith and the Church’s living authority provides the basis for just such an expansion. Scheeben views ecclesiastical authority not solely as a juridical arbiter, but as representative and instrument of God’s truthfulness.7 [End Page 434] The Church’s power for juridical decision is, for Scheeben, only one of its attributes. Indeed, the communication of juridical power to the Church depends upon the investiture of that authority by which “the divine motive of faith confronts us . . . and exercises its influence on us.”8 The Church therefore plays a necessary role not just in presenting the material content of faith, or in...