LiCoO2 (LCO) is commonly used as a cathode for Li-ion batteries (LiBs) owing to its excellent intercalation nature, high voltage, and cyclic performance [1, 2]. However, LCO has issues due to the potential risk of future price increases of Co [3, 4]. Many efforts have been made to reduce the amount of Co in the cathode by replacing it with Ni and/or Mn, and LiNixMnyCozO2 (NMC) has been developed. NMC622, which contains 60 mol % of Ni in the transition metal composition, is now adopted in the majority of the electric vehicle battery chemistry. Although Ni-rich NMC is a promising alternative to low-Co cathodes, it is not clear whether the amount of Co can be further reduced from the present NMC622 without degrading cyclic stability. To further reduce the amount of Co, it is necessary to clarify the role of Co in the charge compensation mechanism and replace it with alternative elements with functions similar to those of Co.In this study, we conducted XAFS, XRD and first-principles calculations for the NMC cathode with various transition metal composition ratios to clarify that the roles of Co, Ni, Mn, and O in the charge compensation mechanism. Synchrotron X-ray experiments were performed at SPring-8 and NewSUBARU synchrotron radiation facility in Japan. The first-principles calculations were carried out with Vienna Ab-initio Simulation Package (VASP) [5, 6], which uses plane-wave basis sets.Fig. 1 shows the oxygen K-edge XANES spectra collected by the partial fluorescence yield (PFY) method at different states of charge (SOCs). As for the LCO, the peak intensity around 528 eV changed along with the SOC, suggesting that oxygen contributes to the charge compensation. Similar spectral changes were also observed with NMC111, NMC622, and slightly with NMC 811. In contrast, the white line energy in the Co L3-edge absorption hardly changed at any transition metal composition. Although there are various theories about the role of Co and oxygen in the charge compensation [7], our results show that there is no obvious change in the charge state of Co and oxygen contributes the most to the charge compensation in the LCO system. Detailed analysis including first-principles calculations will be discussed at the meeting.[1] K. Mizushima et al., Mater. Res. Bull. 15, 783 (1980).[2] A. Du Pasquier et al., J. Power Sources 115, 171 (2003).[3] P.A. Nelson et al., Modeling the Performance and Cost of Lithium-Ion Batteries for Electric-Drive Vehicles, Argonne National Laboratory, 2012.[4] Elsa A. Olivetti e t al., Joule 1, 229 (2017).[5] P. E. Blöch, Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953 (1994).[6] G. Kresse et al., Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758 (1999).[7] B. Li et al., Adv. Mater. 29, 1701054 (2017) Figure 1
Read full abstract