Perception Of Verticality Research Articles

Perception of postural verticality in roll and pitch while sitting and standing in healthy subjects

Assessment of verticality perception is increasingly used in patients with disorders of upright body orientation, e.g. in pusher behavior after hemispheric stroke or in retropulsion in neurovascular or degenerative diseases. The subjective postural vertical (SPV) assesses the individual’s perceived upright body orientation in space and can be determined in a sitting or a standing position. As somatosensory input differs between sitting and standing, we suppose a different representation of verticality. Thus, the aim of this study was to compare the SPV while sitting and while standing, and to determine the influence of proprioceptive and visual stimulations on the SPV in both positions.Twenty healthy subjects (18–40 years, 9 female) participated in two experiments. In experiment 1 the SPV was assessed in the pitch and roll planes while sitting and standing. In experiment 2 we additionally applied somatosensory Achilles tendon vibration and visual optokinetic stimulation.Results of experiment 1 revealed no difference of the SPV error between sitting and standing. Though, we found an increased SPV variability while sitting. Experiment 2 showed no effect of sensory manipulation in the pitch plane, but an effect of optokinetic stimulation in the roll plane. The tilt in direction of the visual stimuli was more pronounced while sitting. Optokinetic stimulation also resulted in a larger SPV variability in roll, indicating larger insecurity in verticality estimation during stimulation.In conclusion, even though the SPV assessment while sitting and standing resulted in similar mean values, the larger variability and the higher sensitivity to visual stimuli while sitting suggest different strategies for verticality estimation while sitting and while standing.

Impaired Balance in Patients with Fibromyalgia Syndrome: Predictors of the Impact of This Disorder and Balance Confidence

Patients with fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) have a nonspecific postural balance disorder and a greater prevalence of falls. Objective: to clarify which aspects of maintaining balance are associated with the impact of the disorder and with balance confidence. Methods: A total of 182 persons with FMS agreed to participate in this study. After re-evaluation, 57 fully met inclusion criteria: age 40–70 years and moderate-severe impact of the illness according to the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ). All participants underwent a posture control analysis with a stabilometric platform, an evaluation of the perception of verticality and an exploration of the vestibular system via functional tests. Additionally, they self-completed questionnaires about balance confidence, central sensitization, pain catastrophizing, kinesiophobia, dizziness and days with episodes of instability. Results: The FIQ was associated with central sensitization and dizziness, which explained 56% of its variance (AdjR2 = 0.566), while days with instability, kinesiophobia and dizziness also explained more than half of the variance of the balance confidence scale (AdjR2 = 0.527). A high percentage of positive responses was found for functional tests (>50%) and a high dispersion in the stabilometric parameters. Conclusion: the detection of factors susceptible to intervention, such as disability due to dizziness, takes on special relevance in patients with FMS.

Subjective Verticality Is Disrupted by Astigmatic Visual Distortion in Older People.

PurposeThere is little research evidence to explain why older adults have more problems adapting to new spectacles incorporating astigmatic changes than younger adults. We tested the hypothesis that astigmatic lenses oriented obliquely would lead to errors in verticality perception that are greater for older than younger adults.MethodsParticipants included 12 young (mean ± SD age 25.1 ± 5.0 years) and 12 older (70.2 ± 6.3 years) adults with normal vision. Verticality perception was assessed using a computer-based subjective visual vertical (SVV) task, under static and dynamic (in the presence of a moving peripheral distractor) conditions and when viewing targets through the near refractive correction (control condition), and two forms of astigmatic lenses oriented in the vertical, horizontal, and oblique meridians.ResultsThe older group demonstrated much greater dynamic SVV errors (e.g., 3.4° for the control condition) than the younger group (1.2°, P = 0.002), larger errors with vertical and horizontal astigmatic lenses (older group 4.1°and 5.2° for toric and magnifier lenses vs. younger group 1.2° and 1.4°, respectively, P < 0.001), and a larger influence of the oblique astigmatic lenses (older group 5.6° vs. younger group 2.1°, P<0.001).ConclusionsAstigmatic lenses produced little or no errors in SVV in young adults, but large static and dynamic SVV errors in older adults. This indicates a greater reliance on visual input with increased age for SVV, and helps explain why oblique astigmatic refractive corrections can cause dizziness in older patients and why they report greater difficulties adapting to new spectacles with astigmatic changes.

Effects of prolonged roll-tilt on the subjective visual and haptic vertical in healthy human subjects.

While verticality perception is normally accurate when upright, a systematic bias ("post-tilt bias") is seen after prolonged roll-tilt. The source of the bias could either be central (shifting "null" position) or related to changes in torsional eye-position. To study the mechanisms of the post-tilt bias in vision-dependent and vision-independent paradigms and to characterize the impact of optokinetic stimulation. The subjective visual-vertical (SVV) and subjective haptic-vertical (SHV) were measured after static roll-tilt (±90deg ear-down ("adaptation") position; duration = 5 min; n = 9 subjects). To assess the effect of visual stimuli, a control condition (darkness) was compared with an optokinetic stimulus (clockwise/counter-clockwise rotation, 60deg/sec) during adaptation. A significant post-tilt bias was more frequent for the SVV than the SHV (72% vs. 54%, p = 0.007) with shifts pointing towards or away from the adaptation position with similar frequency. Exponential-decay time-constants were comparable for both paradigms and directions of shifts. The optokinetic stimulus had no effect on the bias for either paradigm. Emerging in both vision-dependent and vision-independent paradigms, the results support the hypothesis that the post-tilt bias results from a shift in the internal estimate of direction of gravity, while optokinetic nystagmus seems not to be a major contributor.

Horizontal and Vertical Distance Perception in Altered Gravity

The perception of the horizontal and vertical distances of a visual target to an observer was investigated in parabolic flight during alternating short periods of normal gravity (1 g). microgravity (0 g), and hypergravity (1.8 g). The methods used for obtaining absolute judgments of egocentric distance included verbal reports and visually directed motion toward a memorized visual target by pulling on a rope with the arms (blind pulling). The results showed that, for all gravity levels, the verbal reports of distance judgments were accurate for targets located between 0.6 and 6.0 m. During blind pulling, subjects underestimated horizontal distances as distances increased, and this underestimation decreased in 0 g. Vertical distances for up targets were overestimated and vertical distances for down targets were underestimated in both 1 g and 1.8 g. This vertical asymmetry was absent in 0 g. The results of the present study confirm that blind pulling and verbal reports are independently influenced by gravity. The changes in distance judgments during blind pulling in 0 g compared to 1 g support the view that, during an action-based task, subjects base their perception of distance on the estimated motor effort of navigating to the perceived object.

Evaluation of the utricular function with the virtual–subject visual vertical system: comparison with ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials

Introduction: The subjective visual vertical (SVV) is the most frequently assessed modality of verticality perception and has been measured in a variety of clinical situations, including peripheral vestibular lesions.Aim: The main objectives are (1) to collect normative data of Virtual SVV™ from healthy subjects, and (2) to study the correlation between Virtual SVV™ and ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (o-VEMP) on healthy subjects.Materials and methods: Forty-three healthy subjects were recruited. Air conduction (AC)-elicited oVEMPs and bone conduction (BC)-elicited oVEMPs were measured. BC stimuli were produced with a RadioEar B-81 High Output Bone Transducer. Virtual SVV™ were also measured.Results: Virtual SVV™ data from our healthy subjects were consistent with previously published normative SVV data. Normal Virtual SVV™ data did not correlate with normal AC-elicited and BC-elicited oVEMPs.Conclusions: Virtual SVV™ data from our healthy subjects were consistent with previously published normative SVV data. Virtual SVV™ data from our 43 health subjects only had weak correlation with c-VEMP, AC-elicited and BC-elicited oVEMPs. These data serve as a baseline for a future study of patients with unilateral utricular dysfunction.Significance: The Virtual SVV™ can be an attractive substitute for traditional SVV in clinical settings.

Variance based weighting of multisensory head rotation signals for verticality perception.

We tested the hypothesis that the brain uses a variance-based weighting of multisensory cues to estimate head rotation to perceive which way is up. The hypothesis predicts that the known bias in perceived vertical, which occurs when the visual environment is rotated in a vertical-plane, will be reduced by the addition of visual noise. Ten healthy participants sat head-fixed in front of a vertical screen presenting an annulus filled with coloured dots, which could rotate clockwise or counter-clockwise at six angular velocities (1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 16°/s) and with six levels of noise (0, 25, 50, 60, 75, 80%). Participants were required to keep a central bar vertical by rotating a hand-held dial. Continuous adjustments of the bar were required to counteract low-amplitude low-frequency noise that was added to the bar's angular position. During visual rotation, the bias in verticality perception increased over time to reach an asymptotic value. Increases in visual rotation velocity significantly increased this bias, while the addition of visual noise significantly reduced it, but did not affect perception of visual rotation velocity. The biasing phenomena were reproduced by a model that uses a multisensory variance-weighted estimate of head rotation velocity combined with a gravito-inertial acceleration signal (GIA) from the vestibular otoliths. The time-dependent asymptotic behaviour depends on internal feedback loops that act to pull the brain's estimate of gravity direction towards the GIA signal. The model's prediction of our experimental data furthers our understanding of the neural processes underlying human verticality perception.

Decreased grey matter in the postural control network is associated with lateral flexion of the trunk in Parkinson’s disease

BackgroundDisruption of central networks, particularly of those responsible for integrating multimodal afferents in a spatial reference frame, were proposed in the pathophysiology of lateral trunk flexion in Parkinson’s disease (PD). Knowledge about the underlying neuroanatomical structures is limited. ObjectiveTo investigate if decreased focal grey matter (GM) is associated with trunk flexion to the side and if the revealed GM clusters correlate with a disturbed perception of verticality in PD. Methods37 PD patients with and without lateral trunk flexion were recruited. Standardized photos were taken from each patient and trunk orientation was measured by a blinded rater. Voxel-based morphometry (VBM) was used to detect associated clusters of decreased GM. The subjective visual vertical (SVV) was assessed as a marker for perception of verticality and SVV estimates were correlated with GM clusters. ResultsVBM revealed clusters of decreased GM in the right posterior parietal cortex and in the right thalamus were associated with lateral trunk flexion. The SVV correlated with the extent of trunk flexion, and the side of the SVV tilt correlated with the side of trunk flexion. GM values from the thalamus correlated with the SVV estimates. ConclusionsWe report an association between neurodegenerative changes within the posterior parietal cortex and the thalamus and lateral trunk flexion in PD. These brain structures are part of a network proposed to be engaged in postural control and spatial self-perception. Disturbed perception of verticality points to a shifted egocentric spatial reference as an important pathophysiological feature.

Use of Commercial Virtual Reality Technology to Assess Verticality Perception in Static and Dynamic Visual Backgrounds.

The Subjective Visual Vertical (SVV) test and the closely related Rod and Disk Test (RDT) are measures of perceived verticality measured in static and dynamic visual backgrounds. However, the equipment used for these tests is variable across clinics and is often too expensive or too primitive to be appropriate for widespread use. Commercial virtual reality technology, which is now widely available, may provide a more suitable alternative for collecting these measures in clinical populations. This study was designed to investigate verticality perception in symptomatic patients using a modified RDT paradigm administered through a head-mounted display (HMD). A group of adult patients referred by a physician for vestibular testing based on the presence of dizziness symptoms and a group of healthy adults without dizziness symptoms were included. We investigated degree of visual dependence in both groups by measuring SVV as a function of kinematic changes to the visual background. When a dynamic background was introduced into the HMD to simulate the RDT, significantly greater shifts in SVV were found for the patient population than for the control population. In patients referred for vestibular testing, the SVV measured with the HMD was significantly correlated with traditional measures of SVV collected in a rotary chair when accounting for head tilt. This study provides initial proof of concept evidence that reliable SVV measures in static and dynamic visual backgrounds can be obtained using a low-cost commercial HMD system. This initial evidence also suggests that this tool can distinguish individuals with dizziness symptomatology based on SVV performance in dynamic visual backgrounds.

The role of spectral cues in vertical plane elevation perception

The role of spectral cues in vertical plane elevation perception

Use of Vestibular Rehabilitation in the Pediatric Population

Purpose The purpose of this article was to provide a perspective on vestibular rehabilitation for children. Conclusion The developing child with vestibular dysfunction may present with a progressive gross motor delay, sensory disorganization for postural control, gaze instability, and poor perception of motion and verticality. It is important that vestibular-related impairments be identified early in infancy or childhood so that evidence-based interventions can be initiated. A focused and custom vestibular rehabilitation program can improve vestibular-related impairments, enabling participation. Depending on the child's age, diagnosis, severity, and quality of impairments, vestibular rehabilitation programs may consist of gaze stabilization exercises, static and dynamic balance exercises, gross motor practice, and/or habituation exercises. Exercises must be modified for children, done daily at home, and incorporated into the daily life situation.

Dynamic time series smoothing for symbolic interval data applied to neuroscience

This work aimed to appraise a multivariate time series, high-dimensionality data-set, presented as intervals using a Symbolic Data Analysis (SDA) approach. SDA reduces data dimensionality, considering the complexity of the model information through a set-valued (interval or multi-valued). Additionally, Dynamic Linear Models (DLM) are distinguished by modeling univariate or multivariate time series in the presence of non-stationarity, structural changes and irregular patterns. We considered neurophysiological (EEG) data associated with experimental manipulation of verticality perception in humans, using transcranial electrical stimulation. The innovation of the present work is centered on use of a dynamic linear model with SDA methodology, and SDA applications for analyzing EEG data.

Changing Vertical Self-motion Perception

Changing Vertical Self-motion Perception

Effect of dynamic visual motion on perception of postural vertical through the modulation of prior knowledge of gravity

To internally estimate gravitational direction and body orientation, the central nervous system considers several sensory inputs from the periphery and prior knowledge of gravity. It is hypothesized that the modulation of visual inputs, supplying indirect information of gravity, affects the prior knowledge established internally by other sensory inputs from vestibular and somatosensory systems, leading to the alteration of perceived body orientation relative to gravity. In order to test the hypothesis, we examined the effect of presenting a visual motion stimulus during a whole-body static tilt on the subsequent evaluation of the perceived postural vertical. Fifteen subjects watched a target moving along the body longitudinal axis directing from head to feet with constant downward acceleration (CA condition) or constant velocity (CV condition), or they did not receive any visual stimulation (NV condition) during the whole-body static tilt. Subsequently, the direction of the subjective postural vertical (SPV) was evaluated. The result showed that the SPV in the CA condition was significantly tilted toward the direction of the preceding tilt compared to that in the NV condition while those in the CV and NV conditions were not significantly different. The present result suggests that dynamic visual motion along body longitudinal axis with downward acceleration can modulate prior knowledge of gravity, and in turn this affects the perception of body verticality.

The role of vestibular function on the representation of space and its impairment after central and peripheral lesions

Our perception of space is based on the integration of signals from vestibular, visual, and somatosensory systems. These sensory modalities allow awareness of the displacements and positions of our body and body parts, as well as the locations of objects in extra-personal space. Brain lesions can produce severe deficits in the representation of personal or extra-personal space, as demonstrated by the syndrome of unilateral (left) spatial neglect after (right) hemisphere stroke. Many aspects of the neglect syndrome have been ascribed to pathological biases in the internal representation of space, some of which can also be observed in patients with dysfunction of the vestibular pathways, either in the peripheral or central nervous system. The recent studies showed for example, neglect patients like vestibular patients exhibit an ipsilesional (e.g. rightward) deviation of their subjective body midline when pointing straight-ahead, as well as ipsilesional biases in posture and abnormal perception of verticality. Therefore, it has been hypothesized that some impairment in the integration of vestibular signals at the brain level might contribute to impaired spatial cognition and neglect after focal hemispheric damage. A critical role for the vestibular system in neglect would be consistent with its central projections on multisensory integration areas in parietal and frontal cortex which are thought to be involved in the representation of space across egocentric and allocentric spatial frames of reference, and which are typically damaged in neglect patients.

Influence of unilateral spatial neglect on vertical perception in post-stroke pusher behavior

Pusher behavior (PB) impairs verticality in the frontal plane and is often associated with unilateral spatial neglect (USN). However, it is unclear whether USN affects verticality among patients with PB. We aimed to clarify the characteristics of verticality among PB, with and without USN. The study included 43 patients with right hemisphere stroke, including 12 without PB or USN, 10 with only USN, 10 with PB only, and 11 with PB and USN, and 15 age-matched healthy individuals. The subjective visual vertical (SVV), subjective postural vertical with eyes closed (SPV), and subjective postural vertical with eyes open were assessed. Under each condition, the mean (tilt direction) and standard deviation (variability) across trials were calculated. The variability of SVV was significantly greater among patients with only USN (6.9°±5.9°) or those with PB and USN (7.6 ± 4.3°). On SPV, the contralesional tilt was significantly greater, with higher variability, in patients with only PB (-2.2°±1.1° and 6.3°±1.4°, respectively) and those with PB and USN (-2.1°±2.0° and 6.6°±2.0°, respectively) than in the other groups. In patients with PB, SVV differed depending on the presence of USN, but it was suggested that SPV might not be affected by USN. These findings are important to plan PB treatment.

Perception of verticality is altered in people with severe chronic low back pain compared to healthy controls: A cross-sectional study

BackgroundPeople with chronic low back pain (CLBP) have abnormal lumbar proprioception, which increases their reliance on visual input to maintain body verticality. Maintaining verticality is important for spatial orientation, balance and movement coordination. It is unknown if these patients also have altered perception of verticality. ObjectiveTo compare whether the perception of verticality is different between people with and without CLBP. DesignCross-sectional. MethodsTwo comparisons of perception of verticality were done between a group of people with CLBP (n = 25) and healthy people (n = 25); and between a subgroup of people with severe CLBP (n = 14) and healthy people (n = 25). In a dark room, the subjective visual vertical test was performed under 3 conditions: rod, rod-and-frame, and rod-and-disc. In each condition, the rod was tilted 40° clockwise and counterclockwise, and the participants were asked to bring it back to vertical 0° position. The rod deviation from verticality was recorded in degrees. ResultsWhen considering the CLBP group, analysis of variance showed that deviation from verticality had no significant group interaction with condition (p = 0.2), or group main effect (p = 0.2). However, deviation from verticality was significantly different between the conditions (p < 0.001). When considering the severe CLBP subgroup, the interaction effect was significant (p = 0.046). Simple main effects showed that the severe CLBP subgroup had larger deviations from verticality (7.5 ± 0.9 deg) compared to the healthy group (4.2 ± 0.7 deg) specifically on the rod-and-frame condition (p = 0.007). ConclusionPeople with severe CLBP appear to have larger deviations in judging verticality compared to the healthy group.

Altered Visual and Proprioceptive Spatial Perception in Individuals with Parkinson's Disease.

Difficulties in the integration of visual, vestibular, and somatosensory information in individuals with Parkinson's disease (PD) may alter perception of verticality. Accordingly, in this cross-sectional study, we analyzed PD patients' (n = 13) subjective visual vertical (SVV) and subjective haptic vertical (SHV) perceptions and compared them to those of healthy controls (n = 14). We compared SVV and SHV findings among participants with PD, healthy controls, and cutoff points of normality based on prior research literature, using the parametric nonpaired t test (at p < .05) and Cohen's d (at d > 0.8) to determine clinical relevance. We analyzed SVV with the bucket test and SHV with the rod rotations task in clockwise and counterclockwise directions. We calculated Pearson correlations to analyze the association between verticality tests and the most clinically affected body side. We calculated both the percentage of A-effect (expression of body tilt underestimation to the midline) and E-effect (expression of body tilt overestimation in the upright position). Individuals with PD showed greater variability in right SHV supination compared to the healthy control participants (p = .002). There was greater clinical relevance in right (as opposed to left) SVV (d = 0.83), right (as opposed to left) SHV pronation (d = 0.91), and left (as opposed to right) SHV pronation (d = 0.88). We observed a higher proportion of E-effect in individuals with PD. A significantly higher proportion of patients with PD, compared to patients in past literature, had right SHV pronation (p = .001), left SHV pronation (p = .023), right SHV supination (p = .001), left SHV supination (p = .046), and left SHV pronation (p = .046). Thus, subjective visual and proprioceptive perception of verticality is altered in patients with PD, compared to individuals without PD.

Positive self-perception and corticospinal excitability: Recalling positive behavior expands peripersonal space boundaries

Converging evidence suggests that peripersonal space has dynamic properties, that can be influenced by motor and cognitive factors. Here, we investigated whether changes in self-perception may impact upon peripersonal representation. Specifically, employing non-invasive brain stimulation, we tested whether corticospinal excitability elicited by objects placed in the vertical peripersonal vs extrapersonal space can be influenced by changes in self-perception after recalling a personal experience inducing the feeling of high power (vs. positivity vs. low power).In a preliminary study (Study 1, N = 39) participants were presented with an object, whose position was manipulated in the horizontal vs vertical space. We assessed corticospinal excitability by measuring Motor Evoked Potentials (MEPs) using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation with Electromyography co-registration (TMS-EMG). In the horizontal condition, we replicated the well-known motor facilitation induced by objects falling in the peri vs extrapersonal space, while in the vertical dimension MEPs were higher in the extrapersonal space.In the main experiment (Study 2), participants (N = 55) were randomly assigned to feel high power, low power, or a general positive emotion and were asked to observe the same object positioned either in the peripersonal or in the extrapersonal vertical space. Results showed that in the low power condition MEPs were higher in the extrapersonal vs peripersonal, as in Study 1, while in high power and positive conditions MEPs were not influenced by distance.Taken together, our findings suggest a dissociable pattern of motor facilitation underlying vertical vs horizontal space perception and, crucially, that changes in self-perception can influence such a representation.

Vestibular disorders in roll plane from brainstem to cortex

The aim is to review current knowledge of the perception of verticality, its normal function and disorders. This is based on an integrative graviceptive input from the vertical semicircular canals and the otolith organs. The focus is particularly on human psychophysics, neurophysiological and imaging data on vestibular disorders in the roll plane. The signs and symptoms are head tilt, vertical divergence of the eyes (skew deviation), ocular torsion, and tilts of subjective visual vertical (SVV) adjustments, all of which represent the so-called ocular tilt reaction (OTR). Furthermore, these signs will be related to mathematical modeling of specific vestibular cell functions for orientation in space in rodents and in patients. Pathological tilts of the SVV in the roll plane are most sensitive and frequent clinical vestibular signs of unilateral lesions extending from the labyrinths via the brainstem and thalamus to the parieto-insular vestibular cortex [[1]Brandt T. Dieterich M. The dizzy patient: Don’t forget disorders of the central vestibular system.Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2017 Jun; 13: 352-362https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2017.58Google Scholar]. Due to crossings of ascending graviceptive fibers, peripheral vestibular and pontomedullary lesions cause ipsilateral tilts of the SVV; ponto-mesencephalic lesions cause contralateral tilts. In contrast, SVV tilts, which are measured in unilateral vestibular lesions at thalamic and cortical levels, have two different characteristic features: (i) they may be ipsi- or contralateral, and (ii) they are smaller than those found in lower brainstem or peripheral lesions. Motor signs such as head tilt and body lateropulsion, i.e. components of OTR, are typical for vestibular lesions of the peripheral vestibular organ and the pontomedullary brainstem (vestibular nucleus). They are less frequent in midbrain lesions (interstitial nucleus of Cajal) and rare in cortical lesions. Vestibular function in the roll plane and its disorders can be mathematically modeled by an attractor model of the function of angular head velocity cells and head direction cells [[2]Glasauer S. Dieterich M. Brandt T. Neuronal network-based mathematical modelling of perceived verticality in acute unilateral vestibular lesions: from nerve to thalamus and cortex.J. Neurol. 2018 May 29; https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-018-8909-5Google Scholar]. Conclusion: Clinical determinations of the SVV are easy and reliable. They indicate acute unilateral vestibular dysfunctions, the causative lesion of which extends from labyrinth to cortex. Together with additional ocular motor or brainstem signs they allow precise topographical diagnosis of side and level.