Vertebrate Eye Development Research Articles

FGF19‐FGFR4 signaling elaborates lens induction with the FGF8‐L‐Maf cascade in the chick embryo

The fibroblast growth factor (FGF) family is known to be involved in vertebrate eye development. However, distinct roles of individual FGF members during eye development remain largely elusive. Here, we show a detailed expression pattern of Fgf19 in chick lens development. Fgf19 expression initiated in the forebrain, and then became restricted to the distal portion of the optic vesicle abutting the future lens placode, where FGF receptor 4 (Fgfr4), a receptor for FGF19, was expressed. Fgf8, a positive regulator for L-Maf, was expressed in a portion of the optic vesicle. To examine the role of FGF19 signaling during early eye development, Fgf19 was misexpressed near the presumptive lens ectoderm; however, no alteration in the expression of lens marker genes was observed. Conversely, a secreted form of FGFR4 was misexpressed to inhibit an FGF19 signal, resulting in the induction of L-Maf expression. To further define the relationship between L-Maf and Fgf19, L-Maf misexpression was performed, resulting in ectopic induction of Fgf19 expression by Hamburger and Hamilton's stage 12/13. Furthermore, misexpression of Fgf8 induced Fgf19 expression in addition to L-Maf. These results suggest that FGF19-FGFR4 signaling plays a role in early lens development in collaboration with FGF8 signaling and L-Maf transcriptional system.

Six3functions in anterior neural plate specification by promoting cell proliferation and inhibitingBmp4expression

Although it is well established that Six3 is a crucial regulator of vertebrate eye and forebrain development, it is unknown whether this homeodomain protein has a role in the initial specification of the anterior neural plate. In this study, we show that exogenous Six3 can expand the anterior neural plate in both Xenopus and zebrafish, and that this occurs in part through Six3-dependent transcriptional regulation of the cell cycle regulators cyclinD1 and p27Xic1, as well as the anti-neurogenic genes Zic2 and Xhairy2. However, Six3 can still expand the neural plate in the presence of cell cycle inhibitors and we show that this is likely to be due to its ability to repress the expression of Bmp4 in ectoderm adjacent to the anterior neural plate. Furthermore, exogenous Six3 is able to restore the size of the anterior neural plate in chordino mutant zebrafish, indicating that it has the ability to promote anterior neural development by antagonising the activity of the BMP pathway. On its own, Six3 is unable to induce neural tissue in animal caps, but it can do so in combination with Otx2. These results suggest a very early role for Six3 in specification of the anterior neural plate, through the regulation of cell proliferation and the inhibition of BMP signalling.

Photoreceptor morphology is severely affected in the β,β‐carotene‐15,15′‐oxygenase (bcox) zebrafish morphant

The retinoic acid molecule, a vitamin A derivative, is of key importance for eye and photoreceptor development in vertebrates. Several studies have provided evidence that the ventral part of the retina is particularly susceptible to impairment in retinoid signalling during the period of its development. In zebrafish, targeted gene knockdown of beta,beta-carotene-15,15'-oxygenase (bcox), the key enzyme for vitamin A formation, provokes a loss of retinoid signalling during early eye development that results in microphthalmia at larval stages. Using this model, we analysed the consequences of this for the retinal morphology of the fish larvae in structural details. Our analyses revealed that rods and cones do not express photoreceptor specific proteins (rhodopsin, peanut agglutinin, zpr1) in the peripheral retina. The photoreceptors in the central retina showed shortened outer segments, and electron dense debris in their intermembranal space. The number of phagosomes was increased, and cell death was frequently observed in the outer nuclear layer. Furthermore, the number of Muller cells was significantly reduced in the inner nuclear layer. Thus, we found that the lack of retinoid signalling strongly effects photoreceptor development in the ventral and dorsal retina. In addition, shortened outer segments and cell death of the remaining photoreceptors in the central retina indicate that there is an ongoing need for retinoid signalling for photoreceptor integrity and survival at later developmental stages.

Chx10repression ofMitfis required for the maintenance of mammalian neuroretinal identity

During vertebrate eye development, the cells of the optic vesicle (OV) become either neuroretinal progenitors expressing the transcription factor Chx10, or retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) progenitors expressing the transcription factor Mitf. Chx10 mutations lead to microphthalmia and impaired neuroretinal proliferation. Mitf mutants have a dorsal RPE-to-neuroretinal phenotypic transformation, indicating that Mitf is a determinant of RPE identity. We report here that Mitf is expressed ectopically in the Chx10(or-J/or-J) neuroretina (NR), demonstrating that Chx10 normally represses the neuroretinal expression of Mitf. The ectopic expression of Mitf in the Chx10(or-J/or-J) NR deflects it towards an RPE-like identity; this phenotype results not from a failure of neuroretinal specification, but from a partial loss of neuroretinal maintenance. Using Chx10 and Mitf transgenic and mutant mice, we have identified an antagonistic interaction between Chx10 and Mitf in regulating retinal cell identity. FGF (fibroblast growth factor) exposure in a developing OV has also been shown to repress Mitf expression. We demonstrate that the repression of Mitf by FGF is Chx10 dependent, indicating that FGF, Chx10 and Mitf are components of a pathway that determines and maintains the identity of the NR.

MyoD–lacZ transgenes are early markers in the neural retina, but MyoD function appears to be inhibited in the developing retinal cells

Recent findings suggest that eye and skeletal muscle development in vertebrates share the same regulatory network. In that network, Pax3 gene is apparently activated through Dach/Eya/Six feedback loop to mediate MyoD-driven myogenesis. The purpose of this study was to investigate previously reported MyoD–lacZ expression in the developing mouse neural retina and to gain insight into the potential role of MyoD in the embryonic retinal cells. The analysis of MD6.0–lacZ and 258/−2.5lacZ transgenic embryos revealed that the retinal temporal expression pattern of the two transgenes resembled their expression pattern in the MyoD-dependent precursor muscle cells. However, MyoD transcripts and protein could not be found in the sites of MyoD–lacZ retinal expression. Furthermore, our immunohistochemical analysis suggests the existence of diverse factors (e.g., Pax6 and Chx10) within the retinal cells that differentially and inappropriately activate the two transgenes. Finally, the retinal phenotype observed in Pax7−/− knock-out mice suggests a role for Pax7 in photoreceptor cell differentiation, retinal lamination and in the etiopathology of retinoblastoma. Taken together, our data suggest that the MyoD gene evolved a different mechanism to achieve its down-regulation within the retina than that of the Myf5 gene.

Tbx12 regulates eye development in Xenopus embryos

The regulation of vertebrate eye development requires the activity of many transcription factors. In this report, we demonstrate that the T-box factor Tbx12 is necessary for normal development of the retina. Tbx12 is expressed during early stages of retinal development in multiple species of vertebrate embryos. We injected mRNAs encoding wild type and mutant forms of Tbx12 into Xenopus embryos. The Tbx12 injected embryos exhibit multiple defects in eye development including reduced eye size and disruption of normal retinal laminar organization. Tbx12 appears to function as a repressor of transcription during eye development. Our results indicate that Tbx12 activity is required for the proper generation and organization of retinal cells in the vertebrate eye.

The homeobox geneXbh1cooperates with proneural genes to specify ganglion cell fate within theXenopusneural retina

Recent studies on vertebrate eye development have focused on the molecular mechanisms of specification of different retinal cell types during development. Only a limited number of genes involved in this process has been identified. In Drosophila, BarH genes are necessary for the correct specification of R1/R6 eye photoreceptors. Vertebrate Bar homologues have been identified and are expressed in vertebrate retinal ganglion cells during differentiation; however, their retinal function has not yet been addressed. In this study, we report on the role of the Xenopus Bar homologue Xbh1 in retinal ganglion cell development and its interaction with the proneural genes Xath5 and Xath3, whose ability to promote ganglion cell fate has been demonstrated. We show that XHB1 plays a crucial role in retinal cell determination, acting as a switch towards ganglion cell fate. Detailed expression analysis, animal cap assays and in vivo lipofection assays, indicate that Xbh1 acts as a late transcriptional repressor downstream of the atonal genes Xath3 and Xath5. However, the action of Xbh1 on ganglion cell development is different and more specific than that of the Xath genes, and accounts for only a part of their activities during retinogenesis.

Hedgehog signaling in vertebrate eye development: a growing puzzle.

The vertebrate retina has been widely used as a model to study the development of the central nervous system. Its accessibility and relatively simple organization allow analysis of basic mechanisms such as cell proliferation, differentiation and death. For this reason, it could represent an ideal place to solve the puzzle of Hh signaling during neural development. However, the extensive wealth of data, sometimes apparently discordant, has made the retina one of the most complicated models for studying the role of the Hh cascade. Given the complexity of the field, a deep analysis of the data arising from different animal models is essential. In this review, we will compare and discuss all reported roles of Hh signaling in eye development to shed light on its multiple functions.

Direct interaction of geminin and Six3 in eye development.

Organogenesis in vertebrates requires the tight control of cell proliferation and differentiation. The homeobox-containing transcription factor Six3 plays a pivotal role in the proliferation of retinal precursor cells. In a yeast two-hybrid screen, we identified the DNA replication-inhibitor geminin as a partner of Six3. Geminin inhibits cell-cycle progression by sequestering Cdt1 (refs 4, 5), the key component for the assembly of the pre-replication complex. Here, we show that Six3 efficiently competes with Cdt1 directly to bind to geminin, which reveals how Six3 can promote cell proliferation without transcription. In common with Six3 inactivation, overexpression of the geminin gene (Gem; also known as Gmn) in medaka (Oryzias latipes) induces specific forebrain and eye defects that are rescued by Six3. Conversely, loss of Gem (in common with gain of Six3 (ref. 1)) promotes retinal precursor-cell proliferation and results in expanded optic vesicles, markedly potentiating Six3 gain-of-function phenotypes. Our data indicate that the transcription factor Six3 and the replication-initiation inhibitor geminin act antagonistically to control the balance between proliferation and differentiation during early vertebrate eye development.

Regulation of vertebrate eye development by Rx genes

The paired-like homeobox-containing gene Rx has a critical role in the eye development of several vertebrate species including Xenopus, mouse, chicken, medaka, zebrafish and human. Rx is initially expressed in the anterior neural region of developing embryos, and later in the retina and ventral hypothalamus. Abnormal regulation or function of Rx results in severe abnormalities of eye formation. Overexpression of Rx in Xenopus and zebrafish embryos leads to overproliferation of retinal cells. A targeted elimination of Rx in mice results in a lack of eye formation. Mutations in Rx genes are the cause of the mouse mutation eyeless (ey1), the medaka temperature sensitive mutation eyeless (el) and the zebrafish mutation chokh. In humans, mutations in Rx lead to anophthalmia. All of these studies indicate that Rx genes are key factors in vertebrate eye formation. Because these results cannot be easily reconciled with the most popular dogmas of the field, we offer our interpretation of eye development and evolution.

Targeted expression of the dominant-negative FGFR4a in the eye using Xrx1A regulatory sequences interferes with normal retinal development.

Molecular analysis of vertebrate eye development has been hampered by the availability of sequences that can selectively direct gene expression in the developing eye. We report the characterization of the regulatory sequences of the Xenopus laevis Rx1A gene that can direct gene expression in the retinal progenitor cells. We have used these sequences to investigate the role of Fibroblast Growth Factor (FGF) signaling in the development of retinal cell types. FGFs are signaling molecules that are crucial for correct patterning of the embryo and that play important roles in the development of several embryonic tissues. FGFs and their receptors are expressed in the developing retina, and FGF receptor-mediated signaling has been implicated to have a role in the specification and survival of retinal cell types. We investigated the role of FGF signaling mediated by FGF receptor 4a in the development of retinal cell types in Xenopus laevis. For this purpose, we have made transgenic Xenopus tadpoles in which the dominant-negative FGFR4a (Delta FGFR4a) coding region was linked to the newly characterized regulatory sequences of the Xrx1A gene. We found that the expression of Delta FGFR4a in retinal progenitor cells results in abnormal retinal development. The retinas of transgenic animals expressing Delta FGFR4a show disorganized cell layering and specifically lack photoreceptor cells. These experiments show that FGFR4a-mediated FGF signaling is necessary for the correct specification of retinal cell types. Furthermore, they demonstrate that constructs using Xrx1A regulatory sequences are excellent tools with which to study the developmental processes involved in retinal formation.

Loss of eyes in zebrafish caused by mutation of chokh/rx3.

The vertebrate eye forms by specification of the retina anlage and subsequent morphogenesis of the optic vesicles, from which the neural retina differentiates. chokh (chk) mutant zebrafish lack eyes from the earliest stages in development. Marker gene analysis indicates that retinal fate is specified normally, but optic vesicle evagination and neuronal differentiation are blocked. We show that the chk gene encodes the homeodomain-containing transcription factor, Rx3. Loss of Rx3 function in another teleost,medaka, has also been shown to result in an eyeless phenotype. The medaka rx3 locus can fully rescue the zebrafish mutant phenotype. We provide evidence that the regulation of rx3 is evolutionarily conserved, whereas the downstream cascade contains significant differences in gene regulation. Thus, these mutations in orthologous genes allow us to study the evolution of vertebrate eye development at the molecular level.

Retinal expression of zebrafish six3.1 and its regulation by Pax6

Homologues of the homeobox genes sine oculis ( so) and eyeless ( ey) are important regulators of eye development in both vertebrates and invertebrates. A Drosophila paralogue of so, optix, is an orthologue of the vertebrate Six3 gene family. Our analysis of zebrafish six3.1 demonstrated retinal expression in two separate cell layers and the ciliary marginal zone. This pattern is consistent with the observations of Six3 in other vertebrates and indicates functional conservation. We studied the 5 ′ flanking region of six3.1 and showed that separate enhancing elements are required for expression at different stages of eye development. This analysis also revealed specific binding of zebrafish Pax6.1 protein to an element required for six3.1 expression in ganglion cells. Furthermore, an enhancement of six3.1 transcription by Pax6.1 was observed by co-injection experiments. These results provide evidence for a direct regulatory interaction between vertebrate Pax6 and Six3 genes in eye development.

Drosophila retinal homeobox (drx) is not required for establishment of the visual system, but is required for brain and clypeus development

The possibility that mechanisms of retinal determination may be similar between vertebrates and Drosophila has been supported by the observations that Pax6/eyeless genes are necessary and sufficient for retinal development. These studies suggest that the function of other gene families, operating during early eye development, might also be conserved. One candidate is the retinal homeobox (Rx) family of transcription factors. Vertebrate Rx is expressed in the prospective eye and forebrain and is required for eye morphogenesis, retinal precursor appearance, and normal forebrain development, indicating that it is an essential regulator of early eye and brain formation. Here, we test the hypothesis that Drosophila Rx (drx) is required for adult and larval eye development. We have isolated a drx null allele and demonstrate that the mutant compound eye and larval visual system is not detectably abnormal. However, we find that drx is required for development of a central brain structure, the ellipsoid body, suggesting that Rx function in the brain may be conserved. Finally, we characterize a novel anterior head phenotype and demonstrate that drx is required for clypeus development. Thus, our data suggest that drx may be required for the regulation of genes involved in brain morphogenesis and clypeus precursor development. We propose that differences in insect and vertebrate eye development may be explained by changes in gene regulation and/or the tissue of origin for eye precursor cells.

All about Drosophila eye development (almost)

edited by Kevin Moses Springer-Verlag (2002) 282 pages. ISBN 3-540-42590-X £97.50/$149Knowledge of Drosophila eye development has grown almost exponentially over the past few decades. Not only are the mechanisms that account for the formation of this multifaceted structure intrinsically interesting in their own right, but they have also contributed enormously to our understanding of general developmental paradigms and molecular pathways. The explosion in research into the Drosophila eye was sparked principally by the groups of Seymour Benzer and Gerry Rubin, and it is primarily their offspring who have contributed the chapters to the recent volume Drosophila Eye Development (Vol. 37 in the series Results and Problems in Cell Differentiation), edited by Kevin Moses.Each chapter in the book is a stand-alone review making it possible to readup on individual topics. These range from the earliest establishment of the eye-field to retinal connections, colour vision and Drosophila as a model for disease, and together give a fairly comprehensive overview of the current areas of interest in this field. Reading the book from cover to cover is slightly problematic. There was quite a lot of repetition in the early chapters, which describe early patterning genes; TGF-β and Hedgehog signalling featured in several places too. These chapters created a modicum of confusion since the conclusions seemed to differ slightly. Beyond these early chapters we were hooked by a wide range of contributions that each touch on a different problem. Particularly refreshing were those topics that we had not come across in other reviews, such as the evolution of colour vision and applications to human disease modelling. The latter chapter starts with a good, succinct overview of some of the major contributions made through studies of the eye and would be a useful chapter to give to upper-level undergraduates to illustrate the diversity of applications of this model.The book, therefore, provides a valuable introduction to an important paradigm in developmental biology. As a whole it might not be of immediate relevance to cell biologists, although chapters on regulation of growth and proliferation, protein stability, and programmed cell death would be of interest to cell and developmental biologists alike. In addition there is one gem by Don Ready about the emergence of form in the eye, which describes the progression in cell shapes and cell contacts that occur as the eye develops. This short essay highlights some of the amazing changes in cell morphology and considers how these could contribute forces that shape the geometrical regularity of the Drosophila compound eye.There is a danger that the book will become dated as the field progresses,and so those chapters with a well-rounded historical perspective are likely to be the ones that better stand the test of time. Some of the chapters tend to focus on the most recent findings, whereas others, even amongst the better known topics, manage to achieve a balance between the two. Occasionally, we found ourselves wanting more debate on the differing current models and controversies, but the extensive reference lists should allow readers to explore these for themselves. The quality of figures used to illustrate each chapter also varies considerably. Those comparing vertebrate and Drosophila eye development are exceptionally good, particularly the colour diagrams. The chapter on cell death is also nicely illustrated, but in some others the figures are thin on the ground, which makes sections a bit dry or hard to follow.With contributions from many key researchers in the field, this book provides an excellent reference text for those already working with the Drosophila eye and, for those about to, it conveys a fascination for the eye and the intricacy of its development. The only major shortcoming is its cover price (almost £100), which means that a book that many might like to have on their personal bookshelves will instead be confined largely to library shelves.

Extraretinal and retinal hedgehog signaling sequentially regulate retinal differentiation in zebrafish

Hedgehog (Hh) signaling is required for eye development in vertebrates; known roles in the zebrafish include regulation of eye morphogenesis and ganglion cell and photoreceptor differentiation. We employed a temporally selective Hh signaling knockdown strategy, by using antisense morpholino oligonucleotides or the teratogenic alkaloid cyclopamine, in order to dissect the separate roles of Hh signaling arising from specific sources. We also examined the eye phenotype of zebrafish slow muscle-omitted (smu) mutants, which lack a functional smoothened gene, encoding a component of the Hh signal transduction pathway. We find that Hh signaling from extraretinal sources is required for the initiation of retinal differentiation, but this involvement may be independent of the effects of Hh signaling on optic stalk development. We also find that Hh signals from ganglion cells participate in propagating expression of ath5, and we suggest that the effects of Hh signals from the retinal pigmented epithelium on photoreceptor differentiation may be mediated by the transcription factor rx1.

Probing teleost eye development by lens transplantation

Experimental manipulation and other lines of evidence indicate that the lens plays a prominent role in the growth and differentiation of the vertebrate eye. Here we describe a lens transplantation method for studying the role of the lens in teleost eye development. The method involves three steps: (1) preparing embryos for the operations by embedding them in agar, (2) microsurgery with tungsten needles to remove the lens from a donor embryo and insert it into the optic cup of a host embryo lacking its own lens, and (3) a recovery period allowing surface ectoderm to close over the wound left by insertion of the lens into the host embryo. A movie illustrating the method can be found at http://www.life.umd.edu/labs/jeffery. A troubleshooting guide and summary of assays for evaluating the development of the transplanted lens and its effects on other eye parts, including the retina, are presented. Finally, some current applications of the lens transplantation method are briefly described: (1) determination of the autonomy of zebrafish lens mutants and (2) investigation of the role of the lens in eye degeneration in the cavefish Astyanax. The transplantation method will help characterize the mechanisms through which vertebrate eye development is regulated by the lens.

Analysis of gene function in the zebrafish retina

Mutagenesis screens in zebrafish have uncovered several hundred mutant alleles affecting the development of the retina and established the zebrafish as one of the leading models of vertebrate eye development. In addition to forward genetic mutagenesis approaches, gene function in the zebrafish embryo is being studied using several reverse genetic techniques. Some of these rely on the overexpression of a gene product, others take advantage of antisense oligonucleotides to block function of selected loci. Here we describe these methods in the context of the developing eye.

Embryonic retinal gene expression in sonic-you mutant zebrafish.

Hedgehog (Hh) signaling is required for proper eye development in vertebrates; known roles for Hh in the zebrafish include regulation of eye morphogenesis, ganglion cell neurogenesis, and photoreceptor differentiation. To gain insight into the mechanisms by which Hh signaling influences these developmental events, we have examined proliferation, cell death, and expression patterns of several retinal genes in the eyes of embryonic zebrafish lacking the sonic hedgehog gene. We find that features of the eye phenotype of the sonic-you (syu) mutant are consistent with multiple roles for the Hh signal during retinal development. Most interestingly, half of the mutant retinas failed to initiate cell differentiation and, instead, retained a neuroepithelial appearance. In the other half of the mutants, retinal cell differentiation was initiated, but not fully propagated. We also find that Hh signaling is important for retinal cell proliferation and retinal cell survival; together, these functions provide an explanation for progressive microphthalmia in the syu-/- mutant.

Six3 inactivation reveals its essential role for the formation and patterning of the vertebrate eye.

The establishment of retinal identity and the subsequent patterning of the optic vesicle are the key steps in early vertebrate eye development. To date little is known about the nature and interaction of the genes controlling these steps. So far few genes have been identified that, when over-expressed, can initiate ectopic eye formation. Of note is Six3, which is expressed exclusively in the anterior neural plate. However, 'loss of function' analysis has not been reported. Using medaka fish, we show that vertebrate Six3 is necessary for patterning of the anterior neuroectoderm including the retina anlage. Inactivation of Six3 function by morpholino knock-down results in the lack of forebrain and eyes. Corroborated by gain-of-function experiments, graded interference reveals an additional role of Six3 in the proximodistal patterning of the optic vesicle. During both processes of vertebrate eye formation, Six3 cooperates with Pax6.