Purpose: The prevalence of osteoarthritis is higher among women. In post menopausal period both reduction in bone mineral density and osteoarthritis spesific symptoms may begin to appear. The breast size of the women is one of the major factor for kyphotic position. Reduction in bone mineral density and trunk misaligment, primarily affect thoracal vertebra position. Vertebral bone degeneration, depending on age, may make the deteriorated position permanent. This process not only affects muscular strength and range of motion but also affects daily life activities and quality of life. This study is conducted to investigate whether there is a relationship between flexibility, muscle strength, shoulder range of motion and quality of life with perception of depression. Methods: 19 women were recruited in the present study. The exclusion criteria included any psychiatric, neurological or musculoskeletal disorders except neck and upper back pain. At the begining, the volunteers were subjected to the assessment protocol which included demographic data (age, weight in kilograms and height in meters). Manuel muscle test was applied bilatteraly to the rhomboid muscle, trapez muscle, pectoral muscles, upper back erector spinae muscles by the same clinician. Range of motions of upper back and neck were assessed by using standard goniometer. In both, assessment measurements were done 3 times and medium values used. The Scapular symmetry and shoulder protraction was evaluated with measurement of acromion-wall distance, occiput-wall distance, T3-Spina Scapulae, T7- Inferior Angle of Scapulae. Patiens’s quality of life measured with SF-36 and depression with Beck Depression Inventory. After the data were collected analyzed with SPSS 21. Pearson’s correlation analysses test was used to investigate of correlations between the parameters were measured. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: The mean values of age and body mass index of the subjects were 32.16±8.09 years and 23.23±3.20 kg/m2, respectively. There was moderate correlation between right shoulder flexion and Social Function (SF) which is a subscale of SF-36 (r:0.500, p:0.029), left shoulder flexion and Social Function (SF) (r:0.600, p:0.007). There was moderate correlation between left shoulder flexion and Role Physical (RP) (r:0.523, p:0.022), Role Emotional (RE) (r:0.609, p:0.006) and Mental Component Summary (r:0.573, p:0.01), respectively. While there was significant correlation between left shoulder abduction and SF-36 General Health (GH) (r:0.614, p:0.05) and Social Function (SF) (r:0.584, p: 0.009), there was moderate correlation between right and left shoulder rotation and SF-36 Role Physical (RP) (r:0.456, p:0.049). There was moderately negative correlation between neck rightand left rotation and Beck Depression Inventory (r:-0.622, p:0.004) and significant correlation with SF-36 General Health (GH) (r:0.495, p: 0.031). The moderate and strong correlation between muscle strength and subscales of SF-36 with their correlation coefficient and p values were given in the table. The measurements that were conducted to determine the position and flexibility, there was moderately negative correlation between Acromion Wall Distance, SF-36 Role Physical (RP) (r:-0.616, p:0.005), Role Emotional (RE) (r:-0.622, p:0.004) and Mental Component Summary (r:-0.603, p:0.006). There was no correlation between other parameters of the study (p>0.005). Conclusions: According to the results of the present study, there was moderate towards strong correlation between anthropometric measurements, muscle strength and health related quality of life among women with postural kyphosis. The effects of the non-dominance extremity values on their quality of life of the subjects was one of the remarkable results of the present study. Subsequent to maintaining postural integrity by increasing muscular strength and range of motion, may bring about increase in health related quality of life among women suffering from postural kyphosis.Tabled 1Muscle StrengthM. RhomboideusM. TrapeziusM. PectoralisM. Erector SpinaeRLRLRLPhysical Function---r:0.466 p:0.044--r:0.461 p:0.047General Healthr:0.650 p:0.003r:0.650 p:0.003r:0.647 p:0.003r:0.711 p:0.001r:0.468 p:0.044r:0.468 p:0.044r:0.706 p:0.001Social Functionr:0.515 p:0.024r:0.515 p:0.024r:0.492 p:0.032r:0.631 p:0.004r:0.518 p:0.023r:0.518 p:0.023r:0.724 p:0.000Vitalityr:0.463 p:0.046r:0.463 p:0.046-r:0.409 p:0.004--r:0.507 p:0.027Physical Component Summaryr:0.519 p:0.023r:0.519 p:0.023-r:0.582 p:0.009--r:0.580 p:0.009 Open table in a new tab
Read full abstract