Axial Vertebral Rotation Research Articles

Reliability of the axial vertebral rotation measurements of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using the center of lamina method on ultrasound images: in vitro and in vivo study.

This study aimed to investigate the intra- and inter-observer reliability of the axial vertebral rotation (AVR) measurements of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) using the center of lamina (COL) method on ultrasound transverse images. Three cadaver vertebrae were scanned with 42 AVR configurations by both ultrasound and radiograph. In this in vitro study, four observers measured the AVR using the COL method on ultrasound transverse images and three observers measured the AVR using the Stokes' method on radiographs. In the in vivo study, 13 AIS subjects were recruited. Eighteen spinal curvatures were identified and 48 vertebrae were selected for the AVR measurements. Two observers performed the AVR measurements on both the ultrasound images and radiographs. All measurements were performed twice with 1week interval apart to reduce memory bias. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), mean absolute differences (MAD), and standard deviation (SD) were used to analyze the intra- and inter-observer reliability of the AVR measurements. The Bland-Altman plot was used to analyze the 95% limit of the differences between the two methods. The proposed COL method had high intra- and inter-observer reliability on both the in vitro and in vivo studies (ICCs>0.91, MADs<1.4°) and agreed well with the experimental setup (ICCs>0.96, MADs<2.3°). The COL method showed good agreement with the Stokes' method for the in vitro study (ICC 0.84-0.85, MAD 4.5°-5.0°), while poor agreement for the in vivo study (ICC 0.49-0.54, MAD 2.7°-3.5°). The pilot study indicated the proposed COL method was a simple and reliable method to evaluate the AVR on ultrasound images. Standardization of the posture during ultrasound scan and taking radiograph is important.

The change on vertebral axial rotation after posterior instrumentation of idiopathic scoliosis.

Agreement between the correction objectives and the instrumentation strategies remains controversial in idiopathic scoliosis. Most studies have focus on the frontal and sagittal plane. The goal of this study was to evaluate the change on vertebral axial rotation after posterior instrumentation in fused and unfused segments. Fourteen patients operated on for idiopathic scoliosis were prospectively included. Fusion and instrumentation were done by posterior approach. All patients had a pre-operative and a 10-day post-operative radiological evaluation with the EOS system. Axial orientation of the vertebrae with special interest to the apical, junctional, and unfused areas was obtained thanks to the reconstruction software. Mean apical vertebra axial rotation statistically decreased from 21° pre-operatively to 13° post-operatively. But, there were no statistically significant differences between pre-operative and post-operative mean axial intervertebral rotations in the main curve and axial rotation of the non-instrumented lower counter curve. 3D analysis of the spine in standing position is a great advancement for post-operative analysis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) corrections. This study confirmed that actual instrumentations are able to achieve "en bloc" 3D correction of the spine but not intervertebral axial rotation correction.

3D ultrasound imaging method to assess the true spinal deformity.

Spinal deformity is a three-dimensional (3D) spinal disorder with a lateral deviation and coupled with axial vertebral rotation (AVR). The current clinical practice only measures its severity on postero-anterior (PA) radiographs, which may underestimate the deformity. The actual severity should be obtained on the plane of maximal curvature (PMC), which requires a 3D spinal image. There are many approaches to reconstruct 3D spinal images; however, ultrasound is one of the promising techniques with its non-ionizing characteristic. This study proposed an image processing method using the voxel-based bilinear interpolation to reconstruct a 3D spinal image from ultrasound data, from which the AVR was measured and the spinal curvature on the PMC was determined. In-vitro and in-vivo experiments were performed to determine the accuracy of the measurements from the ultrasound method. The results showed that the 3D ultrasound spinal image could be reconstructed. The curvature angle on the PA and the PMC planes could also be determined. The tilt angle of each individual vertebra in in-vitro study showed high accuracy and correlation (MAD <; 0.9° ± 0.2° and r(2) > 0.87) when comparing the measurements from CT with ultrasound. In in-vivo study, the curvature angles measured on the PA radiographs and ultrasound images yielded a small difference (MAD 3.4° ± 1.0°) and a strong correlation (r(2) = 0.63) within a clinical accepted error of 5°.

Clinical and stereoradiographic analysis of adult spinal deformity with and without rotatory subluxation

IntroductionIn degenerative adult spinal deformity (ASD), sagittal malalignment and rotatory subluxation (RS) correlate with clinical symptomatology. RS is defined as axial rotation with lateral listhesis. Stereoradiography, recently developed for medical applications, provides full-body standing radiographs and 3D reconstruction of the spine, with low radiation dose. Hypothesis3D stereoradiography improves analysis of RS and of its relations with transverse plane and spinopelvic parameters and clinical impact. Material and methodsOne hundred and thirty adults with lumbar ASD and full-spine EOS® radiographs (EOS Imaging, Paris, France) were included. Spinopelvic sagittal parameters and lateral listhesis in the coronal plane were measured. The transverse plane study parameters were: apical axial vertebral rotation (apex AVR), axial intervertebral rotation (AIR) and torsion index (TI). Two groups were compared: with RS (lateral listhesis>5mm) and without RS (without lateral listhesis exceeding 5mm: non-RS). Correlations between radiologic and clinical data were assessed. ResultsRS patients were significantly older, with larger Cobb angle (37.4° vs. 26.6°, P=0.0001), more severe sagittal deformity, and greater apex AVR and TI (respectively: 22.9° vs. 11.3°, P<0.001; and 41.0° vs. 19.9°, P<0.001). Ten percent of patients had AIR>10° without visible RS on 2D radiographs. RS patients reported significantly more frequent low back pain and radiculalgia. DiscussionIn this EOS® study, ASD patients with RS had greater coronal curvature and sagittal and transverse deformity, as well as greater pain. Further transverse plane analysis could allow earlier diagnosis and prognosis to guide management. Level of evidence4, retrospective study.

Measurement of axial vertebral rotation using three-dimensional ultrasound images.

BackgroundAxial vertebral rotation (AVR) is one of the important parameters to evaluate the severity and predict the progression of scoliosis. However, the AVR measurements on radiographs may underestimate its actual value. This pilot study investigated a new three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound method to measure AVR.MethodsThree cadaveric vertebrae T7, L1, and L3 were scanned with a 3D medical ultrasound system. Nine sets of ultrasound data, the vertebral rotation from 0 to 40° with 5° increments, were recorded from each vertebra. An in-house program was developed to reconstruct and measure the 3D vertebral images. The rotation of each reconstructed vertebra was determined by the angle between the line going through the centres of either laminae (L-L) or transverse processes (TP-TP) and a reference vertical plane. Three raters measured the rotation in 3 sessions, in which they used the mouse pointer to select the L-L or TP-TP according to their knowledge of vertebral anatomy. The program detected the 3D coordinates of these points and calculated the AVR.The intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to calculate the intra-reliability and inter-reliability. The mean absolute difference (MAD±SD) and the range of difference (RD) between the actual values and the average measurements of each rater were computed to evaluate the accuracy of methods.ResultsWhen rotation was greater than 30° for both L1 and L3, all raters found it difficult to determine one of the lamina areas due to the lack of ultrasound information in an area behind the spinous process. Therefore, the corresponding measurements were excluded. The ICC values of the intra-reliability (L-L, TP-TP) for the three raters were (0.987, 0.991), (0.989, 0.998) and (0.997, 1.000), respectively; meanwhile, the inter-reliability were 0.991 for (L-L) and 0.992 for (TP-TP). All ICC values were greater than 0.98 indicating both methods were highly reliable. The MAD±SD values (L-L, TP-TP) for the three raters were (1.5±0.3°, 1.2±0.2°), (1.6±0.3°, 1.3±0.3°), and (1.7±0.5°, 0.9±0.2°), respectively. The RD (L-L, TP-TP) were (0-4.5°, 0-3.5°), (0-5.1°, 0-4.3°), and (0-5.1°, 0-2.8°) for the three raters, respectively.ConclusionsThe (L-L) and (TP-TP) methods could be used to measure AVR reliability from the 3D ultrasound images.

Validation of 3D surface reconstruction of vertebrae and spinal column using 3D ultrasound data – A pilot study

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a three-dimensional deformity of spine associated with vertebra rotation. The Cobb angle and axial vertebral rotation are important parameters to assess the severity of scoliosis. However, the vertebral rotation is seldom measured from radiographs due to time consuming. Different techniques have been developed to extract 3D spinal information. Among many techniques, ultrasound imaging is a promising method. This pilot study reported an image processing method to reconstruct the posterior surface of vertebrae from 3D ultrasound data. Three cadaver vertebrae, a Sawbones spine phantom, and a spine from a child with AIS were used to validate the development. The in-vitro result showed the surface of the reconstructed image was visually similar to the original objects. The dimension measurement error was <5 mm and the Pearson correlation was >0.99. The results also showed a high accuracy in vertebral rotation with errors of 0.8 ± 0.3°, 2.8 ± 0.3° and 3.6 ± 0.5° for the rotation values of 0°, 15° and 30°, respectively. Meanwhile, the difference in the Cobb angle between the phantom and the image was 4° and the vertebral rotation at the apex was 2°. The Cobb angle measured from the in-vivo ultrasound image was 4° different from the radiograph.

Correlation of Axial Vertebral Rotation with Nerve Root Involvement: The First Clinical Study in Literature

Correlation of Axial Vertebral Rotation with Nerve Root Involvement: The First Clinical Study in Literature

The radiographic method for evaluation of axial vertebral rotation - presentation of the new method.

The objective of this study is to present a new radiographic method for the assessment of vertebral rotation from an antero-posterior view of conventional X-rays which is sufficiently precise in comparison with radiographic methods presently used in clinical practice (methods of Nash-Moe and Perdriolle). This method is based on the properties of the geometric shape of vertebrae and their shared dimensional proportions. It means that the relation between vertebral body width and height doesn’t change significantly within the entire thoracic and lumbar sections of the spine. In order to verify the method, we have constructed a special device for vertebral fixation. Subsequently, the X-ray pictures of individual human vertebrae with predefined rotation values (ranging from 0 degrees to 45 degrees by steps of 3 degrees) were radio-graphically measured and then compared with their actual axial rotation on the vertebral rotation device. All arithmetic averages correlate very closely with the actual values. The verification of axial vertebral rotation with the assistance of CT and MRI pictures of six scoliotic patients (in supine position) and the evaluation of axial vertebral rotation by both the new radiographic method and with the Perdriolle method proved the satisfactory accuracy of our method. The main advantage of the newly presented radiographic method is the uncomplicated measurement of vertebral rotation from AP projection of conventional X-ray pictures or from its printed copies. The gold standard of the new radiographic method is the evaluation of axial rotation of vertebrae to 30 degrees approximately and the shape of vertebral bodies without severe structural deformities. The new radiographic method seems to be suitable for use in clinical practice.

Eigenspine: Computing the correlation between measures describing vertebral pose for patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

This paper describes the concept of eigenspine, a concept applicable for determining the correlation between pair-wise combinations of measures useful for describing the three-dimensional spinal deformities associated with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. The proposed data analysis scheme is based upon the use of principal component analysis (PCA) and canonical correlation analysis (CCA). PCA is employed to reduce the dimensionality of the data space, thereby providing a regularization of the measurements, and CCA is employed to determine the linear dependence between pair-wise combinations of different measures. The usefulness of the eigenspine concept is demonstrated by analyzing the position and the rotation of all lumbar and thoracic vertebrae as obtained from 46 patients suffering from adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. The analysis showed that the strongest linear relationship is found between the lateral displacement and the coronal rotation of the vertebrae, and that a somewhat weaker but still strong correlation is found between the coronal rotation and the axial rotation of the vertebrae. These results are well in-line with the general understanding of idiopathic scoliosis. Noteworthy though is that the correlation between the anterior–posterior displacement and the sagittal rotation was not as strong as expected and that the obtained results further indicate the need for including the axial vertebral rotation as a measure when characterizing different types of idiopathic scoliosis. Apart from analyzing pair-wise correlations between different measures, the method is believed to be suitable for finding a maximally descriptive low-dimensional combination of measures describing spinal deformities in idiopathic scoliosis.

Model-based registration for assessment of spinal deformities in idiopathic scoliosis

Detailed analysis of spinal deformity is important within orthopaedic healthcare, in particular for assessment of idiopathic scoliosis. This paper addresses this challenge by proposing an image analysis method, capable of providing a full three-dimensional spine characterization. The proposed method is based on the registration of a highly detailed spine model to image data from computed tomography. The registration process provides an accurate segmentation of each individual vertebra and the ability to derive various measures describing the spinal deformity. The derived measures are estimated from landmarks attached to the spine model and transferred to the patient data according to the registration result. Evaluation of the method provides an average point-to-surface error of 0.9 mm ± 0.9 (comparing segmentations), and an average target registration error of 2.3 mm ± 1.7 (comparing landmarks). Comparing automatic and manual measurements of axial vertebral rotation provides a mean absolute difference of 2.5° ± 1.8, which is on a par with other computerized methods for assessing axial vertebral rotation. A significant advantage of our method, compared to other computerized methods for rotational measurements, is that it does not rely on vertebral symmetry for computing the rotational measures. The proposed method is fully automatic and computationally efficient, only requiring three to four minutes to process an entire image volume covering vertebrae L5 to T1. Given the use of landmarks, the method can be readily adapted to estimate other measures describing a spinal deformity by changing the set of employed landmarks. In addition, the method has the potential to be utilized for accurate segmentations of the vertebrae in routine computed tomography examinations, given the relatively low point-to-surface error.

Correlation between stereoradiography and 3D topographic measurements

Background The EOS is al ow-dose digital stereoradiography system that can produce highly reproducible spine measurements. The Milwaukee Topographic System (MTS) has reliably detected the 3-dimensional (3D) back surface contour changes. The correlation between Cobb angles and the MTS analog to Cobb angles in both the sagittal and coronal planes have been studied, but data are limited for comparisons of axial vertebral rotation measures derived from the MTS and X ray system. Purpose The goal of this study was to evaluate the correlations between EOS-derived axial rotation and MTS-registered axial surface rotation at each vertebral level. Methods A case control study design was performed, and four subjects with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (ages 10 to 17) had measurements taken using both the MTS and EOS system. The MTS used a handheld laser scanner to gather the subjects’ back geometry while standing. Markers were placed on the subjects’ spinal processes so they could be identified in the scans and a custom software package was used to calculate 3D back measures. The EOS system took bi-planar images of the subjects’ torsos while standing and then calculated spine measurements by semi-automatically making a 3D reconstruction of the spine. The vertebral axial rotations from the MTS and EOS system were compared for the thoracic and lumbar vertebrae. The Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated for all the vertebrae. Results Only one vertebral level measurement, the third lumbar vertebrae (r=0.95, p<0.049), had a significant correlation, although the eighth (r=0.94, p<0.06) and ninth (r=0.92, p<0.08) thoracic vertebrae had high correlations that were close to significance. Conclusions and discussion In this limited study, the MTS predicts for the transverse rotations of the spinal segments, especially in the thoracolumbar and proximal lumbar region. Our current experience may indicate that the larger the vertebral body, the better the 3D reconstructive process using EOS.

Three-dimensional Spine Parameters Can Differentiate Between Progressive and Nonprogressive Patients With AIS at the Initial Visit

Knowledge concerning morphology of the spine is reported in 2-dimensional (2D) or focuses on modification of parameters with progression of spinal deformation. The objective of this study was to compare 3-dimensional (3D) morphologic parameters of the spine at the first visit between progressive and a nonprogressive group of immature adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). The first group was made up of surgically corrected AIS patients (E) (n=19), whereas the second group was composed of nonprogressive AIS that had reached skeletal maturity (n=18). Computerized measurements were undertaken on reconstructed 3D spines. There were 5 categories of measurement: Cobb angles (scoliosis, kyphosis, lordosis), 3D wedging (apical vertebra, mean 2 apical disks), rotation (upper and lower junctional vertebra, apical vertebra, and disk), torsion, and slenderness (height/width ratio of T6, L4, and T1-L5). Nonparametric Mann-Whitney tests were also undertaken. There was no statistical difference between the 2 groups for age, 3D Cobb angle, lordosis, and kyphosis. Mean 3D wedging of the apical disks, lower junctional vertebral axial rotation, torsion and T6, and whole spine height/width ratio were all significantly affected. This study supports the theory that wedging begins in the disks and then in the vertebral body and identifies 3D morphologic parameters that could be used in the prediction of AIS evolution. The findings in the junctional area illustrate that a torsional deformity seems to occur distally from the apex and creates a progressive scoliosis. Curve progression could be predicted based on 3D morphometric parameters, as early as the initial visit.

Physical Significance of the Rib Vertebra Angle Difference and Its 3-Dimensional Counterpart in Early-Onset Scoliosis

Study DesignAnalysis of the rib vertebra angle difference (RVAD) on coronal plane radiographs and the 3-dimensional (3D) RVAD and Local RVAD in the vertebral reference frame from 3D reconstructions of the spine and rib cage of early-onset scoliosis patients (cross-sectional study). ObjectivesTo determine the relationship of RVAD with the geometry of the chest wall. Summary of Background DataAlthough scoliosis is a complex 3D deformity, RVAD is measured on coronal plane radiographs. No clear physical significance has been established for this measurement from a 3D perspective. MethodsWe measured RVAD on posteroanterior radiographs of 42 infantile scoliotic patients (Cobb > 20°) from T4 to T10 using Mehta's method. We computed RVAD 3D using the same landmarks from the 3D reconstruction generated from the calibrated biplanar radiographs. Local RVAD was measured in the local vertebral frontal plane, based on the axial rotation of each vertebra. We divided cases into Phase I and II, based on the rib head overlap with the apical vertebral body on coronal plane radiographs. ResultsApical Local RVAD correlated with Metha's RVAD (Phase I: r = 0.690; Phase II: r = 0.666), and RVAD 3D (Phase I: r = 0.908; Phase II: r = 0.862). Maximal values of RVAD and RVAD 3D were above the apex. Rib vertebra angle difference and Local RVAD were significantly different at the level of maximal RVAD (p < .001) but not at the apex (p = .800). The difference between Local RVAD and maximal RVAD correlated with vertebral axial rotation (Phase I: r = 0.691; Phase II: r = 0.659). ConclusionsRib vertebra angle difference not only indicates asymmetry of the ribs in relation to the spine, it is a compound of physical factors including vertebral axial rotation. The root of its prognostic value remains unclear. Rib vertebra angle difference 3D can serve as an alternative to determine true asymmetry in the costovertebral geometry.

Fully automatic measurements of axial vertebral rotation for assessment of spinal deformity in idiopathic scoliosis

Reliable measurements of spinal deformities in idiopathic scoliosis are vital, since they are used for assessing the degree of scoliosis, deciding upon treatment and monitoring the progression of the disease. However, commonly used two dimensional methods (e.g. the Cobb angle) do not fully capture the three dimensional deformity at hand in scoliosis, of which axial vertebral rotation (AVR) is considered to be of great importance. There are manual methods for measuring the AVR, but they are often time-consuming and related with a high intra- and inter-observer variability. In this paper, we present a fully automatic method for estimating the AVR in images from computed tomography. The proposed method is evaluated on four scoliotic patients with 17 vertebrae each and compared with manual measurements performed by three observers using the standard method by Aaro–Dahlborn. The comparison shows that the difference in measured AVR between automatic and manual measurements are on the same level as the inter-observer difference. This is further supported by a high intraclass correlation coefficient (0.971–0.979), obtained when comparing the automatic measurements with the manual measurements of each observer. Hence, the provided results and the computational performance, only requiring approximately 10 to 15 s for processing an entire volume, demonstrate the potential clinical value of the proposed method.

A Method for Assessing Axial Vertebral Rotation Based on Differential Rod Curvature on the Lateral Radiograph

Bench-top and retrospective radiographical analyses to determine apical vertebral rotation based on differential rod curvature on the postoperative lateral radiograph. To develop a clinically relevant methodology for measuring apical vertebral rotation on postoperative lateral radiographs in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, based on the distance between the spinal rods. Traditional methods of analyzing vertebral rotation on plain radiographs are limited in the postoperative spine with segmental instrumentation. A previous methodology based on pedicle screw tip to rod distances on the posteroanterior radiograph is effective but limited by surgical technique and patient positioning relative to the x-ray beam. The trigonometric relationship between the inter-rod distances on lateral radiographs was defined and validated on a biomechanical model, with apical rotation varying from 0° to 20°. The ability to correct for malposition on the lateral radiograph was tested on 11 postoperative radiographs and correlated against corresponding postoperative computed tomographic scans. The bench-top model had a strong correlation between actual apical rotation and calculated rotation for the full range of image rotations (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.99). For the 11 clinical cases, comparisons of apical rotation measured on computed tomographic scans were highly correlated to the proposed lateral radiograph calculations (r = 0.84). A technique for measuring apical vertebral rotation based on the inter-rod distance on the lateral and posteroanterior radiographs was developed and validated. This technique is resilient to rotation of the patient within the x-ray machine and can complement measurement of rotation on postoperative posteroanterior radiographs.

Loss of apical vertebral derotation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: 2-year follow-up using multi-planar reconstruction computed tomography

The objective of this study was to evaluate 2years post-surgical loss of three-dimensional correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients using multi-planar reconstruction computed tomography (CT). Twenty-seven AIS patients treated by segmental pedicle screw (PS) constructs were included in this study. Correction in the axial plane was evaluated using the "relative apical vertebral rotation angle" (rAVR), defined as the difference between the axial rotation angles of the upper instrumented vertebra and the apical vertebra on reconstructed axial CT images. The Cobb angle of the main curve and apical vertebral translation was measured to evaluate the coronal correction. Thoracic kyphosis was also measured for the evaluation of sagittal profile. Measurements were performed before surgery, and 1week and 2years after surgery. The relationships between the correction losses and skeletal maturity, and variety of spinal constructs were also evaluated. The mean preoperative Cobb angle of the major curve was 59.1°±11.2° before and 13.0°±7.2° immediately after surgery. Two years later, the mean Cobb angle had increased significantly, to 15.5°±7.8°, with a mean correction loss of 2.5°±1.5° (p<0.001). The mean preoperative rAVR of 28.5°±8.4° was corrected to 15.8°±7.8° after surgery. It had increased significantly to 18.5±8.4 by 2years after surgery, with a mean correction loss of 2.7°±1.0° (p<0.001). The mean correction losses for both the Cobb angle and rAVR were significantly greater in the skeletally immature patients. The significant correlations were recognized between the correction losses and the proportion of multi-axial screws, and the materials of constructs. Statistically significant loss of correction in the Cobb angle and apical vertebral axial rotation angle (AVR) were recognized 2years after surgery using PS constructs. The correction losses, especially AVR, were more evident in the skeletally immature patients, and in patients treated with more multi-axial screws and with titanium constructs rather than with stainless constructs.

Prediction of spinal deformity in scoliosis from geometric torsion.

The shape of a curved line that passes through thoracic and lumbar vertebrae is often used to study spinal deformity with measurements in "auxiliary" planes that are not truly three-dimensional (3D). Here we propose a new index, the geometric torsion, which could uniquely describe the spinal deformity. In this study we assessed whether geometric torsion could be effectively used. to predict spinal deformity with the aid of multiple linear regression. Anatomical landmarks were obtained from multi-view radiographic reconstruction and used to generate 3D model of the spine and rib cage of 28 patients. Fourier series best fitted to the vertebral centroids approximated the spinal shape. For each patient, spinal deformity indices were computed. Torsion was calculated and 20 derived parameters were recorded. Torsion inputs were used in a multiple linear regression model for prediction of key spinal indices. The primary clinical Cobb angle (mainly thoracic) was predicted well, with r=0.89 using all 20 inputs of torsion or r=0.83 using just two. Torsion was also well related to the orientation of plane of maximal deformity (r=0.87). Torsion was less accurate but still significant in predicting maximal vertebral axial rotation (r=0.77). This preliminary study showed promising results for the use of geometric torsion as an alternative 3D index of spinal deformity.

Investigating the change in three dimensional deformity for idiopathic scoliosis using axially loaded MRI

BackgroundAdolescent idiopathic scoliosis is a complex three-dimensional deformity, involving a lateral deformity in the coronal plane and axial rotation of the vertebrae in the transverse plane. Gravitational loading plays an important biomechanical role in governing the coronal deformity, however, less is known about how they influence the axial deformity. This study investigates the change in three-dimensional deformity of a series of scoliosis patients due to compressive axial loading. MethodsMagnetic resonance imaging scans were obtained and coronal deformity (measured using the coronal Cobb angle) and axial rotations measured for a group of 18 scoliosis patients (Mean major Cobb angle was 43.4o). Each patient was scanned in an unloaded and loaded condition while compressive loads equivalent to 50% body mass were applied using a custom developed compressive device. FindingsThe mean increase in major Cobb angle due to compressive loading was 7.4o (SD 3.5o). The most axially rotated vertebra was observed at the apex of the structural curve and the largest average intravertebral rotations were observed toward the limits of the coronal deformity. A level-wise comparison showed no significant difference between the average loaded and unloaded vertebral axial rotations (intra-observer error=2.56o) or intravertebral rotations at each spinal level. InterpretationThis study suggests that the biomechanical effects of axial loading primarily influence the coronal deformity, with no significant change in vertebral axial rotation or intravertebral rotation observed between the unloaded and loaded condition. However, the magnitude of changes in vertebral rotation with compressive loading may have been too small to detect given the resolution of the current technique.

Biomechanical comparison of alternative densities of pedicle screws for the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

The objective of this computational study was to compare the biomechanical effects of different implant densities in terms of curve reduction and the force levels at the implant-vertebra interface and on the intervertebral elements. Eight cases were randomly picked among patients who have undergone a posterior spinal instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). For each case, two computer simulations were performed, one with the actual surgery implant pattern and another with the same fusion levels but an alternative implant pattern proposed by an experienced surgeon. The two implant patterns for each case were respectively put into higher and lower implant density group. The spinal correction and the force levels at bone-implant interface and on the intervertebral elements were analyzed and compared between the two groups. There were on average 13% more pedicle screws and 30% more bilaterally placed pedicle screws in the higher versus lower density group. The difference in the density of screws (92% vs. 79%) did not lead to significant difference in terms of the resulting main thoracic (MT) Cobb angle, and the MT apical axial vertebral rotation. The average and maximum implant-vertebra force levels were about 50 and 65%, respectively higher in the higher versus lower density group, but without consistent distribution patterns. The average intervertebral forces did not significantly differ between the two groups. With the same fusion levels, lower density screws allowed achieving similar deformity correction and it was more likely to have lower screw-vertebra loads.

Does lateral vertebral translation correspond to Cobb angle and relate in the same way to axial vertebral rotation and rib hump index? A radiographic analysis on idiopathic scoliosis

The deformity in idiopathic scoliosis (IS) is three dimensional in nature and effective correction involves all three planes. Even though the vertebral translation (VT) is an accepted element in the deformity along with vertebral rotation(VR) as reported by Asher and Cook (Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 20(12):1386-1391, 1995), Kotwicki et al. (Study Health Technol Inf 123:164-168, 2006) and Kotwicki and Napiontek (Pediatr Orthop 28(2):225-229, 2008), rib hump (rib hump index (RI)) and Cobb angle as reported by Aaro and Dahlborn (Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 6(6):567-572, 1981), it was assumed that VT was represented by adequately by Cobb angle and it was not analysed individually. We hypothesized that the Cobb angle and the VT measured in axial plane on CT scan and may not represent the same measurement and factors like coronal plane vertebral tilt,VR and vertebral deformation might affect them in different ways. Hence, VT should be considered as a separate variable and its relationship with VR, RI and Cobb angle should be investigated. Since the newer implants depend on curve translation and derotation for correction studying the role of VT and the relationships is important. VT, VR and RI were measured in CT scans of 75 patients with IS and correlated with Cobb angle. Regression analysis was used to identify the influence of the variables on each other. All the variables significantly correlated with one another but the correlation of Cobb and VT is not perfectly linear and it cannot be used to represent VT. VT influences RI much more than Cobb angle or VR. VT, therefore, merits further study treating it as an independent variable.