Prone Position Ventilation Research Articles

Clinical and epidemiological differences and similarities of viral pneumonias in two pandemics

In a decade, we faced two pandemic viruses, influenza A H1N1pdm09 and SARS CoV-2, whose most serious manifestation is pneumonia. To compare the clinical, epidemiological and management aspects of pneumonias caused by each pandemic virus in adults requiring hospitalization. Comparative, observational study carried out at a regional Chilean hospital, including 75 patients with influenza A H1N1pdm09 prospectively studied in 2009 and 142 patients with SARS-CoV-2 studied in 2020. Patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia were older (56 and 39.7 years respectively, p < 0.01) and had significantly more comorbidities. Cough, fever and myalgias were more frequent in influenza. Dyspnea was more frequent in COVID-19. Patients with COVID-19 had more extensive lung involvement and a longer hospitalization (13.6 and 8.6 days respectively, p = 0.01). There was no difference on ICU admission requirements and mortality attributable to pneumonia. Patients with influenza had greater APACHE scores and a higher frequency of a PaO2/FiO2 ratio ≤ 200. During COVID-19pandemic chest sean replaced x-ray examination. Also high-flow nasal cannulas and awake prone position ventilation were added as treatments. COVID-19 patients were older, had fewer classic flu symptoms but more dyspnea and longer hospitalization periods than patients with influenza.

Critical care echocardiography in prone position patients during COVID-19 pandemic: a feasibility study.

PurposeCritical care echocardiography is a fundamental tool in the hemodynamic evaluation of critically ill patients and prone position ventilation might limit its application. We aim to evaluate the feasibility of transthoracic echocardiography to assess different measurements performed in prone vs supine position in patients during COVID-19 pandemic to answer our research question: What is the feasibility of classic echocardiographic measurements in COVID-19 patients in prone position ventilation?MethodsPatients with covid-19 admitted to ICUs in four academic hospitals with respiratory failure and on mechanical ventilation were evaluated with critical care echocardiography. The first ultrasound assessment was compared between prone and supine patients recording feasibility of several echocardiographic measurements, using Fisher’s exact test complementing with Crombach’s Alpha.Results139 patients were included. Sixty-eight (49%) were evaluated in prone position and seventy one (51%) in supine position. Most variables were highly feasible, left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction were more possible to obtain in prone position, while cardiac output was in supine position. Tricuspid regurgitation was the least feasible overall measurement.ConclusionProne position ultrasound achieved a high feasibility of measurements compared with supine ultrasound in critically ill patients with COVID-19 respiratory failure and on mechanical ventilation.RegistrationPost hoc analysis of Echo-COVID study (NTC04628195, registered November 13, 2020, retrospectively registered).

Blastomycosis-Induced Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Blastomycosis is a systemic mycosis endemic to the Midwestern and South Central United States. Infection is caused by inhaling spores of Blastomyces dermatitidis (B. dermatitidis) that inhabit soil. Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a rare complication of pulmonary blastomycosis with a significantly high mortality rate. We present a case of blastomycosis associated with severe ARDS treated with traditional prone position ventilation (PPV) and neurally adjusted ventilator assist (NAVA) along with antifungal therapy, steroids, and supportive care in a rural setting with no access to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). This case demonstrates that traditional therapies such as prone position ventilation can help patients with blastomycosis-associated ARDS especially in rural settings where advanced therapies such as ECMO are lacking. The use of NAVA in blastomycosis-associated ARDS needs further research.

Characteristics and potential hemodynamic benefits of proning on the right ventricle in intensive care patients with SARS-CoV-2 ARDS

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Introduction One of the key challenges in treating COVID-19 ARDS patients is hemodynamic monitoring. Therapies proven to be effective in ARDS, such as protective ventilation, fluid restriction or high PEEP tend to alter right ventricular (RV) function and indicate a closer in-bed management, which is particularly difficult in prone position (PP) patients. Transthoracic echocardiography(TTE) enables a direct window for hemodynamic monitoring of RV performance. Objective To assess characteristics and potential hemodynamic benefits of proning on the RV in ICU patients with SARS-CoV-2 ARDS, using echocardiography. Methods This is an observational, cross-sectional study of SARS-CoV-2 ARDS in 11 patients hospitalized in a 12 bed ICU in Farhat Hached University hospital in December 2020. All patients were deeply sedated and curarized during the study. After a stabilization period (MAP ≥ 65mmHg), TTE was performed first in the supine position before putting the patient on PP. Same measures were repeated during a second scan 4 to 8 hours after PP setting. Norepinephrine infusion levels were not changed between the two scans. The average duration of a scan was 20 ± 10 minutes depending mostly on echogenicity. Several frequencies and harmonics were tested and we selected the ones that provided the best image quality. PP ventilation (PPV) was performed continuously for 12 hours using the "swimmer position" that enabled affordable TTE views. A quantitative study of the RV was performed using RV focused 4C view. A special view dedicated to the IVC was studied. Parameters measured were RV basal end diastolic diameter, S’ peak wave in TDI, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), fractional area change (FAC) and maximal trans tricuspid velocity (MTTV). Post hoc analysis was performed by two readers (one intensivist and one cardiologist). All parameters are expressed as a mean of two measurements. Results Twenty-four TTEs were performed in 11 patients respectively 40 ± 15mn before and 5.8 ± 1.1hrs after the PP setting. Patients were 71.0 ± 9.4yrs aged, 5(45%) obese, 7(63%) had diabetes mellitus, 4(36%) hypertension, 1(9%) coronary artery disease. All (100%) were on sinus rhythm. 7(63.6%) presented moderate ARDS and 3(27.3%) severe ARDS. None of the patients developed RV failure prior to the examination. The PPV achieved a non-statistically significant improvement in RV function as assessed by the increase of S′, TAPSE, a decrease in RV basal diameter and an increase in FAC. A statistically significant decrease in MTTV (mean 3.20 ± 0.49 m/s before PP vs mean 2.47 ± 0.77m/s (p = 0.01)) was objectified. Conclusions PPV improves hemodynamic parameters of the RV. TEE 4C view is sufficient in the assessment of RV function in PP. SPAP monitoring could be the key parameter to quickly and reliably assess RV response to PPV.

Physiological effect of prone positioning in mechanically ventilated SARS-CoV-2- infected patients with severe ARDS: An observational study.

Background and Aims:Mechanical ventilation in prone position was associated with a reduction in mortality and increase in arterial oxygenation in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients. However, physiological effects of prone position in COVID ARDS patients are unknown.Material and Methods:In this prospective observational study, data of n = 47 consecutive real time RT- PCR confirmed SARS-CoV-2-infected patients with severe ARDS were included. Respiratory mechanics and oxygenation data of recruited patients were collected before and after prone position.Results:Median (Interquartile range, IQR) age of the recruited patients was 60 (50–67) years and median (IQR) PaO2/FiO2 ratio of 61.2 (54–80) mm Hg with application of median (IQR) positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 12 (10–14) cm H2O before initiation of prone position. Out of those patients, 36 (77%) were prone responders at 16 hours after prone session, evident by increase of PaO2 by at least 20 mm Hg or by 20% as compared to baseline, and 73% patients were sustained responders (after returning to supine position). Plateau airway pressure (p < 0.0001), peak airway pressure (p < 0.0001), and driving pressure (p < 0.0001) were significantly reduced in prone position, and static compliance (p = 0.001), PaO2/FiO2 ratio (p < 0.0001), PaO2 (p = 0.0002), and SpO2 (p = 0.0004) were increased at 4 hours and 16 hours since prone position and also after returning to supine position.Conclusion:In SARS-CoV-2-infected patients, mechanical ventilation in prone position is associated with improvement in lung compliance and oxygenation in almost three-fourth of the patients and persisted in supine position in more than 70% of the patients.

Focused Transesophageal Echocardiography in Critical Care: The COVID-19 Pandemic.

Background:The use of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is controversial in patients with COVID-19. The aim of this case series was to demonstrate the usefulness of transesophageal echocardiography in acute cardiovascular care settings in patients with COVID-19 infection.Materials and Methods:We enrolled 13 patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection admitted to the critical care unit of our center from April 1, 2020, to July 30, 2020, in which transesophageal echocardiography was performed. TOE was performed by three cardiologists with training in echocardiography.Results:The main indication was suspected infective endocarditis in four cases, venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cannulation in four cases, suspected prosthetic mitral valve dysfunction in two patients, suspected pulmonary embolism in two patients, and acute right ventricular dysfunction and prone position ventilation in one patient. The final diagnosis was confirmed in 11 patients and discarded in 2 patients. None of the operators result infected.Conclusions:TOE is safe in the context of COVID-19 infection; it must be performed in well-selected cases and in a targeted manner.

Experience of prone position ventilation in clinical nursing application

To understand the effect of supine ventilation in clinical nursing. Application method: 15 cases of respiratory failure and ARDS patients in ICU of our department were treated with recumbent ventilation and nursing measures in recent two years. Effect evaluation: after treatment, 12 patients showed significant improvement of symptoms, and 9 patients were successfully transferred to the department for further treatment. Conclusion: supine ventilation can improve the patient's hypoxia symptoms, increase functional residual air volume, improve ventilation blood flow ratio, reduce mediastinal and cardiac pressure on the lungs, and improve the compliance of the thoracic cavity.

Clinical Practice Guideline: Recommendations on the In-hospital Treatment of Patients with COVID-19.

The mortality of COVID-19 patients who are admitted to a hospital because of the disease remains high. The implementation of evidence-based treatments can improve the quality of care. The new clinical practice guideline is based on publications retrieved by a systematic search in the Medline databases via PubMed and in the Cochrane COVID-19 trial registry, followed by a structured consensus process leading to the adoption of graded recommendations. Therapeutic anticoagulation can be considered in patients who do not require intensive care and have an elevated risk of thromboembolism (for example, those with D-dimer levels ≥ 2 mg/L). For patients in intensive care, therapeutic anticoagulation has no benefit. For patients with hypoxemic respiratory insufficiency, prone positioning and an early therapy attempt with CPAP/noninvasive ventilation (CPAP, continuous positive airway pressure) or high-flow oxygen therapy is recommended. Patients with IgG-seronegativity and, at most, low-flow oxygen should be treated with SARS-CoV-2-specific monoclonal antibodies (at present, casirivimab and imdevimab). Patients needing no more than low-flow oxygen should additionally be treated with janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors. All patients who need oxygen (low-flow, high-flow, noninvasive ventilation/CPAP, invasive ventilation) should be given systemic corticosteroids. Tocilizumab should be given to patients with a high oxygen requirement and progressively severe COVID-19 disease, but not in combination with JAK inhibitors. Noninvasive ventilation, high-flow oxygen therapy, prone positioning, and invasive ventilation are important elements of the treatment of hypoxemic patients with COVID-19. A reduction of mortality has been demonstrated for the administration of monoclonal antibodies, JAK inhibitors, corticosteroids, tocilizumab, and therapeutic anticoagulation to specific groups of patients.

Effect of Trendelenburg position during prone ventilation in fifteen COVID-19 patients. Observational study

Background Prone position ventilation has shown to improve oxygenation and mortality in severe ARDS. The data of prone position ventilation during severe ARDS secondary to COVID-19 have shown similar benefit in oxygenation and mortality. Usually, patient placed in prone position are placed flat or in reverse Trendelenburg positioning to decrease risk of aspiration and abdominal girth compressing the chest. To date, no studies are available to compare the effects of positioning the bed in different angles during the prone position ventilation. Methods An observational study in fifteen patients with severe ARDS secondary to COVID-19 who were placed in the prone position for the first time. All the patients were sedated and chemically paralyzed with no spontaneous effort. All patients were ventilated with the pressure-controlled mode with set PEEP according to the pressure-volume curves. Five patients had esophageal balloon manometry to estimate pleural pressures and trans-pulmonary pressures. Patients were initially placed in reverse Trendelenburg position and later in Trendelenburg position. Tidal volume and respiratory compliance were observed for 30 minutes after bed positioning has been achieved. Tidal volume and total respiratory compliance in both Trendelenburg and reverse Trendelenburg position were compared. Ventilator settings were not changed during the observation. No patients were suspected of increased intra-cranial or intra-ocular pressures. T-test was done to compare the values. Results Tidal volume significantly increased by 80.26 ± 23.4 ml/breath (95% CI 37.7 - 122.9) from 391.3 ± 52.7 to 471.6 ± 60.9 (20.5%) P 0.001. The respiratory system compliance significantly increased by 4.9 ml/cmH2O (95% CI 1.4 - 8.4) from 34.6 ± 4.7 to 39.5 ± 4.6 (14%) P 0.001. Of the five patients with esophageal balloon, the lung compliance significantly increased by 16.7 ml/cmH2O (95% CI 12.8 – 20.6) from 66.6 ± 1.7 to 83.3 ± 3.3 (25%) P 0.001. The chest wall compliance had small but non-significant increase by 1.5 ml/cmH2O (95% CI -1.3 – 4.3) from 65 ± 1.4 to 66.5 ± 2.3 (2%) P 0.085. Conclusion In this study, statistically significant increase in tidal volume, lung and respiratory system compliance were observed in patients placed in the Trendelenburg position during prone position ventilation. The results reflect the effect of body positioning during prone position ventilation. These effects may be the reflection of altered ventilation distribution throughout the lungs and change in pleural pressure as well as trans-pulmonary pressure during body positioning. More studies need to be done to confirm and examine this phenomenon. Precautions should be taken as this maneuver can increase the intra-cranial and intra-ocular pressures. Keywords: COVID-19, Trendelenburg, Reverse Trendelenburg, ARDS

Changes in stroke volume induced by lung recruitment maneuver can predict fluid responsiveness during intraoperative lung-protective ventilation in prone position

BackgroundThe present study aimed to evaluate the reliability of hemodynamic changes induced by lung recruitment maneuver (LRM) in predicting stroke volume (SV) increase after fluid loading (FL) in prone position.MethodsThirty patients undergoing spine surgery in prone position were enrolled. Lung-protective ventilation (tidal volume, 6–7 mL/kg; positive end-expiratory pressure, 5 cmH2O) was provided to all patients. LRM (30 cmH2O for 30 s) was performed. Hemodynamic variables including mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate, SV, SV variation (SVV), and pulse pressure variation (PPV) were simultaneously recorded before, during, and at 5 min after LRM and after FL (250 mL in 10 min). Receiver operating characteristic curves were generated to evaluate the predictability of SVV, PPV, and SV decrease by LRM (ΔSVLRM) for SV responders (SV increase after FL > 10%). The gray zone approach was applied for ΔSVLRM.ResultsAreas under the curve (AUCs) for ΔSVLRM, SVV, and PPV to predict SV responders were 0.778 (95% confidence interval: 0.590–0.909), 0.563 (0.371–0.743), and 0.502 (0.315–0.689), respectively. The optimal threshold for ΔSVLRM was 30% (sensitivity, 92.3%; specificity, 70.6%). With the gray zone approach, the inconclusive values ranged 25 to 75% for ΔSVLRM (including 50% of enrolled patients).ConclusionIn prone position, LRM-induced SV decrease predicted SV increase after FL with higher reliability than traditional dynamic indices. On the other hand, considering the relatively large gray zone in this study, future research is needed to further improve the clinical significance.Trial registrationUMIN Clinical Trial Registry UMIN000027966. Registered 28th June 2017.

Feasibility and effectiveness of prone position ventilation technique for postoperative acute lung injury in infants with congenital heart disease: study protocol for a prospective randomized study

BackgroundProne position ventilation is a widely used lung protection ventilation strategy. The strategy is more convenient to implement in children compared to adults. Due to the precise mechanism of improving oxygenation function, development of pediatric prone ventilation technology has been largely focused on children with acute respiratory distress syndrome. There is a paucity of high-quality studies investigating the effects of prone position ventilation after pediatric cardiac surgery. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of prone position ventilation in infants who develop postoperative acute lung injury after surgery for congenital heart disease.MethodsA single-center, randomized controlled trial of pediatric patients with acute lung injury after surgery for congenital heart disease who will receive prone position ventilation or usual care (control group). A total of 68 children will be enrolled according to the inclusion criteria. The main outcome measures will be lung compliance and oxygenation index. The secondary outcomes will be duration of mechanical ventilation, length of stay in cardiac intensive care unit, reintubation rate, and complication rate.DiscussionThis study will investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of prone position ventilation techniques in children who develop postoperative acute lung injury after surgery for congenital heart disease. The results may help inform strategies to improve airway management after surgery for congenital heart disease.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04607993. Initially registered on 29 October 2020.

Nursing experience of non-invasive ventilation in prone position for a patient with acute respiratory distress syndrome combined with COVID-19

Nursing experience of non-invasive ventilation in prone position for a patient with acute respiratory distress syndrome combined with COVID-19

Evaluation on Improvement of Respiratory Index in Patients with Respiratory Failure in ICU Nursing with Prone Position Ventilation

Evaluation on Improvement of Respiratory Index in Patients with Respiratory Failure in ICU Nursing with Prone Position Ventilation

Considerations of invasive mechanical ventilation in prone position. A narrative review

The evidence regarding logistic considerations and safety events associated with prone position ventilation (PPV) is summarized and a flow diagrama for safe provision of mechanical ventilation in the setting of the COVID-19 pandemic is proposed. A review of the literature was conducted in the Medline via Pubmed, Embase, and Lilacs databases, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Randomized Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health Database, and Google scholar. Overall, 31 articles were selected for the analysis. The incidence of PPV-related safety events varies between 1% and 11.9% and the most frequent complications are pressure ulcers and airway complications. Early initiation of enteral nutrition is recommended, and transfers are possible in patients on PPV. There is controversy regarding contraindications and recommendations for PPV. Recommendations for its safe provision are based on expert opinions and the establishment of protocols for healthcare staff training. Clinical studies are required to determine which are the recommendations that should be considered for safe and reproducible PPV use during this pandemic.

OPERATIVE OUTCOMES IN THORACOSCOPIC-ESOPHAGECTOMY WITH TWO-LUNG VENTILATION IN PRONE POSITION

Objective: To study the post-operative outcomes of two-lung ventilation in patients undergoing prone position thoracoscopicesophagectomy.&#x0D; Study Design: Prospective comparative study.&#x0D; Place and Duration of Study: Department of Thoracic Surgery, Combined Military Hospital, Rawalpindi Pakistan, from Jan to Dec 2019.&#x0D; Methodology: A total of 60 patients operated for both groups of thoraco-esophagectomy in which 34 patients for TLV (two-lung ventilation) and 26 patients for One-lung ventilation were studied. Patients position was prone for Two-lung ventilation in Thoracoscopic-esophagectomy. Post-op blood loss, Hospital stay, duration of anesthesia and operative morbidity was calculated.&#x0D; Results: A total of 60 patients underwent two-lung ventilation in prone position out of which patient of thoracoscopicesophagectomy were 34, while 26 underwent One-lung ventilation in semi-decubitus position thoracoscopic-esophagectomy. All of them were successfully performed without conversion to open thoracotomy. In the study with preparation span for anesthesia induction, mean time of mobilization of thoracic esophagus, mean blood loss during the thoracic mobilization phase, the mean Intensive care unit stay and total hospital stay in two-lung ventilation was less than one-lung ventilation (p&lt;0.05).&#x0D; Conclusion: The present study summarized the clinical outcomes of two-lung ventilation for thoracoscopic-esophagectomy operated patients. This study data showed that Two-lung ventilation intubation in prone position is better approach during the Thoracoscopic-esophagectomy.

Nursing experience of non-invasive ventilation in prone position for a patient with acute respiratory distress syndrome combined with COVID-19

Nursing experience of non-invasive ventilation in prone position for a patient with acute respiratory distress syndrome combined with COVID-19

Advances in the diagnosis and treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome induced by pancreatitis

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is one of the common diseases of the digestive system mainly characterized by acute inflammation of the pancreas and acinar cell destruction, and it can often develop into severe acute pancreatitis (SAP). Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is one of the most common and serious complications of SAP and a common cause of death in patients with SAP. In recent years, there have gained new understanding of the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of SAP-related ARDS, however, a variety of drugs that have been shown to prevent ARDS in SAP animal models have not improved the prognosis of SAP-related ARDS patients in clinical researches. At present, the treatment of SAP-related ARDS still follows the general treatment principles of ARDS, such as treatment of primary disease, lung protective ventilation strategy, prone position ventilation, early short-term use of neuromuscular blockers and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), and so on. However, the influence of high intra-abdominal pressure, intestinal function failure, abdominal incision, and drainage tube on the treatment measures should also be considered for patients with SAP-related ARDS. This article reviews the recent progress in diagnosis and treatment of SAP-related ARDS.

Effect of prone position ventilation on right heart function in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a severe respiratory disease with a high mortality rate. It is characterized by acute onset of pulmonary edema, hypoxemia, and the need of mechanical ventilation. As the primary treatment, ventilation has been considered effective in treating patients with ARDS. Recently, numerous studies have shown that prone position ventilation demonstrates more efficacy compared with traditional supine position. However, the potential impact of the non-physiological prone position on patients remains unclear. Current study aims to evaluate the effect of prone position ventilation on right heart function in ARDS patients. Following Berlin Diagnostic Criteria, 80 eligible patients were recruited and randomly assigned into prone position ventilation group and supine position ventilation group. Different ventilation methods were implemented in these two groups. Both positions showed the beneficial effects, as evidenced by decreased PV score and APACHE II score, enhanced blood gas index and right heart function parameters, and the prognosis analysis. However, compared with those receiving SPV treatment, the patients demonstrated greater benefits from PPV treatment, with significant differences in PV score (p < 0.01) and APACHE II score (p < 0.001), blood gas index such as PAPm (p < 0.05), and right heart function indicators (p < 0.05). Prone position mechanical ventilation is more beneficial than supine position ventilation in improving the blood gas status of patients with moderate to severe ARDS, and it is more helpful to reduce the load on the right heart and promote the recovery of patients.

Patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome due to pandemic Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)

We report on a case study of patients with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Evaluation of factors predicting outcome in patients with COVID-19 are very important. Both patients developed respiratory failure complicated by acute respiratory distress syndrome. Patients were intubated and invasively ventilated, underwent prone positioning and careful ventilation according to criteria for acute respiratory distress syndrome. In addition, biomarkers were daily evaluated including C-reactive protein, d-dimer and high-sensitive troponin T. Although treatment did not differ between patients, one patient survived whereas the other one died. The patient who survived had a faster onset of invasive ventilation with prone positioning, a lower maximal level of C-reactive protein and a lower value of high-sensitive troponin T. The use of mechanical ventilation in combination with a high PEEP and an early start of prone positioning in patients with severe ARDS may be beneficial. The values of C-reactive protein and troponin T levels seems to be predictive for the clinical course. Keywords: Coronavirus disease 2019; COVID-19; Troponin; C-reactive protein; Mechanical ventilation.

Avoiding complications during prone position ventilation

Avoiding complications during prone position ventilation