Ventilation For Acute Respiratory Failure Research Articles

Comparison of programmed sedation care with conventional care in patients receiving mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory failure.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of planned sedation therapy in comparison to standard care for patients receiving mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory failure (ARF). The research included a total of sixty individuals who underwent mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory failure (ARF). Utilizing the random number table method, these patients were randomized at random to either the planned sedation care group (Group PSC) or the conventional care group (Group C). The objective was to assess and contrast the impact of treatment on the two groups. Significantly shorter durations of mechanical ventilation, sedative use, ICU therapy, length of stay, incidence of delirium, and adverse events were observed in Group PSC compared with Group C (P < 0.05). A higher 1-month survival rate following mechanical ventilation, a higher post-intervention forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) as a percentage of the expected value, a higher post-intervention forced vital capacity (FVC), and a higher patient family care satisfaction rate were observed in Group PSC compared to Group C (P < 0.05). The scheduled administration of sedative therapy in patients receiving mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory failure (ARF) offers significant, reliable, and effective therapeutic benefits.

High frequency percussive ventilation in acute respiratory failure

IntroductionHigh-Frequency Percussive Ventilation (HFPV) is a ventilation mode characterised by high-frequency breaths. This study investigated the impact of HFPV on gas exchange and clinical outcomes in acute respiratory failure (ARF) patients during spontaneous breathing, non-invasive ventilation (NIV), and invasive mechanical ventilation (iMV).MethodsThis systematic review included randomised and nonrandomised studies up to August 2023. Inclusion criteria focused on adult ARF patients, HFPV application, comparisons with other ventilation modes, and outcomes related to oxygenation and clinical parameters. A pooled data analysis was performed comparing HFPV with iMV concerning gas exchange, pulmonary infection, and mortality.ResultsOf the 51 identified records, 29 met the inclusion criteria. HFPV was safely and effectively applied to ARF patients during spontaneous breathing or NIV, improving oxygenation. For patients who underwent iMV, HFPV significantly enhanced oxygenation and the arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide, reduced pulmonary infection occurrence, and improved survival. Barotrauma rates were not elevated with HFPV, and hemodynamic stability remained unaffected. HFPV was also utilised in patients undergoing Extra-Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation, resulting in improved lung recruitment and oxygenation.ConclusionHFPV had favourable effects on physiological and certain clinical outcomes in ARF patients. However, the overall evidence quality remains weak, necessitating large-scale randomised controlled trials for definitive conclusions.

Infant feeding and criticality in children.

Data support the protective effects of human breast milk (HBM) feeding in acute illness but little is known about the impact of HBM feeding on the criticality of infants. To explore the relationship between early HBM feeding and severity of illness and recovery in critically ill children requiring intubation and mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory failure (ARF). Prospective cohort study of mothers of patients aged 1-36 months who participated in the acute and follow-up phases of the Randomized Evaluation of Sedation Titration for Respiratory Failure (RESTORE) clinical trial. Participants completed a survey describing HBM dose fed during their infant's first month of life. Of 138 patients, 70 (51%) received exclusive HBM feedings (90%-100% total feeds) and 68 (49%) did not. We found no group differences in severity of illness on paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admission or severity of paediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (PARDS) within the first 24-48 h of intubation/mechanical ventilation (Pediatric Risk of Mortality [PRISM] III-12 score median: 5 vs. 5, p = .88; moderate/severe PARDS: 53% vs. 54%, p = .63). While median time to recovery from ARF was reduced by 1 day in patients who received exclusive HBM feedings, the difference between groups was not statistically significant (median 1.5 vs. 2.6 days, hazard ratio 1.40 [95% confidence interval, 0.99-1.97], p = .06). Human breast milk dose was not associated with severity of illness on PICU admission in children requiring mechanical ventilation for ARF. Data support the protective effects of HBM during acute illness and data from this study support a clinically important reduction in time to recovery of ARF. Paediatric nurses should continue to champion HBM feeding to advance improvements in infant health.

Extracorporeal organ support for critically ill patients: Overcoming the past, achieving the maximum at present, and redefining the future

Extracorporeal organ support (ECOS) has made remarkable progress over the last few years. Renal replacement therapy, introduced a few decades ago, was the first available application of ECOS. The subsequent evolution of ECOS enabled the enhanced support to many other organs, including the heart [veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), slow continuous ultrafiltration], the lungs (veno-venous ECMO, extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal), and the liver (blood purification techniques for the detoxification of liver toxins). Moreover, additional indications of these methods, including the suppression of excessive inflammatory response occurring in severe disorders such as sepsis, coronavirus disease 2019, pancreatitis, and trauma (blood purification techniques for the removal of exotoxins, endotoxins, or cytokines), have arisen. Multiple organ support therapy is crucial since a vast majority of critically ill patients present not with a single but with multiple organ failure (MOF), whereas, traditional therapeutic approaches (mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory failure, antibiotics for sepsis, and inotropes for cardiac dysfunction) have reached the maximum efficacy and cannot be improved further. However, several issues remain to be clarified, such as the complexity and cost of ECOS systems, standardization of indications, therapeutic protocols and initiation time, choice of the patients who will benefit most from these interventions, while evidence from randomized controlled trials supporting their use is still limited. Nevertheless, these methods are currently a part of routine clinical practice in intensive care units. This editorial presents the past, present, and future considerations, as well as perspectives regarding these therapies. Our better understanding of these methods, the pathophysiology of MOF, the crosstalk between native organs resulting in MOF, and the crosstalk between native organs and artificial organ support systems when applied sequentially or simultaneously, will lead to the multiplication of their effects and the minimization of complications arising from their use.

High velocity nasal insufflation versus non-invasive ventilation in acute respiratory failure: a comparative study

Background In order to treat respiratory failure, thermo-humidified nasal high flow oxygen (NHFO) therapy is being used more and more. In several clinical scenarios, NHFO has recently gained popularity as alternative noninvasive respiratory ventilation. Aim The aim is to assess the role of high velocity nasal insufflation (HVNI) versus noninvasive ventilation (NIV) in acute respiratory failure. Patients and methods This is a prospective randomized clinical study conducted on 60 patients admitted to the Chest Department at Menoufia University Hospital with acute respiratory failure. Patients were randomized to receive either noninvasive positive pressure ventilation using an oronasal mask or high-velocity nasal insufflation (initial flow was at 30-40 l/min; temperature was adjusted to 37°C; fraction of inspired oxygen 1.0) with clinical monitoring and arterial blood gas (ABG) monitoring after 2, 6, 12, and 24 h. Results The therapeutic impact of both, HVNI and NIV, on pressure of arterial carbon dioxide (PaCO2), hydrogen ion concentration, arterial oxygen saturation and pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO2) over time was almost similar. There was an improvement in dyspnea and a decrease in respiratory rate over time when compared with baseline results in both groups. There was no statistical difference between both groups. The failure rate in type I respiratory failure (RF) was 33.3% in the HVNI group and 28.6% in the NIV group (P-value 0.7). The failure rate in type II RF was 41.7% in the HVNI group and 25% in the NIV group (P-value 0.3). HVNI was more comfortable for patients and provided better communication and oral intake. Conclusion This study demonstrates that the HVNI was comparable to the NIV in the management of hypoxemic respiratory failure and could be used as a noninvasive method of ventilation alternative to the BiPAP in hypercapnic RF, with more comfortability and better communication in the HVNI group.

Analgesia and Sedation Use During Noninvasive Ventilation for Acute Respiratory Failure.

To describe U.S. practice regarding administration of sedation and analgesia to patients on noninvasive ventilation (NIV) for acute respiratory failure (ARF) and to determine the association of this practice with odds of intubation or death. A retrospective multicenter cohort study. A total of 1017 hospitals contributed data between January 2010 and September 2020 to the Premier Healthcare Database, a nationally representative healthcare database in the United States. Adult (≥ 18 yr) patients admitted to U.S. hospitals requiring NIV for ARF. None. We identified 433,357 patients on NIV of whom (26.7% [95% CI] 26.3%-27.0%) received sedation or analgesia. A total of 50,589 patients (11.7%) received opioids only, 40,646 (9.4%) received benzodiazepines only, 20,146 (4.6%) received opioids and benzodiazepines, 1.573 (0.4%) received dexmedetomidine only, and 2,639 (0.6%) received dexmedetomidine in addition to opioid and/or benzodiazepine. Of 433,357 patients receiving NIV, 50,413 (11.6%; 95% CI, 11.5-11.7%) patients underwent invasive mechanical ventilation on hospital days 2-5 or died on hospital days 2-30. Intubation was used in 32,301 patients (7.4%; 95% CI, 7.3-7.6%). Further, death occurred in 24,140 (5.6%; 95% CI, 5.5-5.7%). In multivariable analysis adjusting for relevant covariates, receipt of any medication studied was associated with increased odds of intubation or death. In inverse probability weighting, receipt of any study medication was also associated with increased odds of intubation or death (average treatment effect odds ratio 1.38; 95% CI, 1.35-1.40). The use of sedation and analgesia during NIV is common. Medication exposure was associated with increased odds of intubation or death. Further investigation is needed to confirm this finding and determine whether any subpopulations are especially harmed by this practice.

Non-invasive Mechanical Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Failure. Clinical Practice Guidelines - on behalf of the German Society of Pneumology and Ventilatory Medicine

The guideline update outlines the advantages as well as the limitations of NIV in the treatment of acute respiratory failure in daily clinical practice and in different indications.Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) has a high value in therapy of hypercapnic acute respiratory failure, as it significantly reduces the length of ICU stay and hospitalization as well as mortality.Patients with cardiopulmonary edema and acute respiratory failure should be treated with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and oxygen in addition to necessary cardiological interventions. This should be done already prehospital and in the emergency department.In case of other forms of acute hypoxaemic respiratory failure with only mild or moderately disturbed gas exchange (PaO2/FiO2 > 150 mmHg) there is no significant advantage or disadvantage compared to high flow nasal oxygen (HFNO). In severe forms of ARDS NIV is associated with high rates of treatment failure and mortality, especially in cases with NIV-failure and delayed intubation.NIV should be used for preoxygenation before intubation. In patients at risk, NIV is recommended to reduce extubation failure. In the weaning process from invasive ventilation NIV essentially reduces the risk of reintubation in hypercapnic patients. NIV is regarded useful within palliative care for reduction of dyspnea and improving quality of life, but here in concurrence to HFNO, which is regarded as more comfortable. Meanwhile NIV is also recommended in prehospital setting, especially in hypercapnic respiratory failure and pulmonary edema.With appropriate monitoring in an intensive care unit NIV can also be successfully applied in pediatric patients with acute respiratory insufficiency.

Safety and efficacy of noninvasive ventilation for acute respiratory failure in general medical ward: a prospective cohort study.

Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) is recommended for use in patients with acute respiratory failure of various etiologies. However, we do not know whether the use of NIV in general medical wards is safe and effective. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of using NIV and factors associated with NIV failure in general medical wards. A prospective cohort study was conducted in general medical wards of the University Hospital. Adult patients with acute respiratory failure treated with NIV were enrolled. The subjects were managed by a multidisciplinary care team that was well trained in the NIV device. The primary outcome was the rate of NIV failure at 48 hours. Secondary outcomes included hospital mortality and factors associated with NIV failure. A total of 86 patients were enrolled. The mean age was 70±17 years old. The Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) III and the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores were 56±17 and 4±3, respectively. The most common indication of NIV use was cardiogenic pulmonary edema (34.9%). The rate of NIV failure at 48 hours and hospital mortality were 20.9% and 12.8%, respectively. The SOFA score was associated with failure of NIV at 48 hours [odds ratio (OR) 1.48, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.16-1.89; P=0.002]. NIV was safe and effective on general medical wards. Cardiogenic pulmonary edema was the most common indication for the application of NIV. The SOFA score was associated with the failure of NIV at 48 hours.

To study indication’s outcomes and complications of non-invasive ventilation in acute respiratory failure

Failure of respiratory system in one or both of its gas-exchanging functions- oxygenation of pulmonary arterial blood and carbon-dioxide elimination from mixed venous blood. Non-Invasive Ventilation is an alternative to invasive ventilation in many conditions it is a valuable component in patient management. Its use in acute respiratory failure is widely accepted and well known. To Study the indications, outcomes, and complications of NIV. This is a prospective observational study conducted on 100 patients admitted with either Type-I or Type -II respiratory failure. Various common indications for use of NIV in acute Respiratory Failure are COPD, ILD, Bronchiectasis, Pneumonia, Pulmonary Thromboembolism, Kyphoscoliosis, and Pulmonary Tuberculosis in that order. The overall success rate of NIV is 84%. NIV helps in improving gas exchange in acute respiratory failure irrespective of its type, reduces intubation and length of hospital stay hence, its use as the first modality of treatment in patients without overt contraindications is recommended. Overall, NIV is safe and effective in patients with acute respiratory failure as there are no major complications associated with its use.

Ten key messages of the S2kguideline on noninvasive mechanical ventilation in acute respiratory failure

Ten key messages of the S2kguideline on noninvasive mechanical ventilation in acute respiratory failure

Effectiveness of non-invasive ventilation in acute respiratory failure by Covid-19 at Befelatanana hospital Antananarivo

Effectiveness of non-invasive ventilation in acute respiratory failure by Covid-19 at Befelatanana hospital Antananarivo

Intermittent non-invasive ventilation to prevent post-extubation treatment failure in patients with obesity

Over the past 20 years, the use of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) has increased in acutely ill patients. More recently, the use of high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) has received clinical interest. NIV or HFNC, or both, is used either to avoid endotracheal intubation or to prevent re-intubation in patients at risk for extubation failure. Clinical practice guidelines inform the appropriate use of NIV 1 Rochwerg B Brochard L Elliott MW et al. Official ERS/ATS clinical practice guidelines: noninvasive ventilation for acute respiratory failure. Eur Respir J. 2017; 501602426 Crossref PubMed Scopus (728) Google Scholar and HFNC. 2 Rochwerg B Einav S Chaudhuri D et al. The role for high flow nasal cannula as a respiratory support strategy in adults: a clinical practice guideline. Intensive Care Med. 2020; 46: 2226-2237 Crossref PubMed Scopus (104) Google Scholar Effect of non-invasive ventilation after extubation in critically ill patients with obesity in France: a multicentre, unblinded, pragmatic randomised clinical trialAmong critically ill adults with obesity undergoing extubation, the use of NIV was effective to reduce treatment-failure within 3 days. Our results are relevant to clinical practice, supporting the use of NIV after extubation of critically ill patients with obesity. However, most of the difference in the primary outcome was due to patients in the oxygen therapy group switching to NIV, and more evidence is needed to conclude that an NIV strategy leads to improved patient-centred outcomes. Full-Text PDF

Noninvasive Ventilation for Acute Respiratory Failure in Pediatric Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the use of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) for acute respiratory failure (ARF) in pediatric patients. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials, and Clinicaltrials.gov with a last update on July 31, 2022. We included RCTs comparing NIV with any comparator (standard oxygen therapy and high-flow nasal cannula [HFNC]) in pediatric patients with ARF. We excluded studies performed on neonates and on chronic respiratory failure patients. Baseline characteristics, intubation rate, mortality, and hospital and ICU length of stays were extracted by trained investigators. We identified 15 RCTs (2,679 patients) for the final analyses. The intubation rate was 109 of 945 (11.5%) in the NIV group, and 158 of 1,086 (14.5%) in the control group (risk ratio, 0.791; 95% CI, 0.629-0.996; p = 0.046; I2 = 0%; number needed to treat = 31). Findings were strengthened after removing studies with intervention duration shorter than an hour and after excluding studies with cross-over as rescue treatment. There was no difference in mortality, and ICU and hospital length of stays. In pediatric patients, NIV applied for ARF might reduce the intubation rate compared with standard oxygen therapy or HFNC. No difference in mortality was observed.

Role of noninvasive ventilation for acute respiratory failure due to snakebite

Introduction: Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) has revolutionised the management of diverse forms of respiratory failure.1 Case report: An 18 year old male patient presented to the emergency department with a history of an Indian krait snake bite on his left upper limb about seven hours ago. He had signs and symptoms of local and systemic envenomation, left upper limb cellulitis and suspected acute tubular necrosis of the kidneys. He was administered anti-snake venom and given supportive care. He was shifted to the intensive care unit where a noninvasive ventilator was used for supporting his respiratory system via a full face mask. He received NIV for thirteen days intermittently alternating with 60 percent oxygen via a Venturi mask. Progressively, he showed significant improvement and was weaned off NIV. He was discharged from hospital with no neurological sequelae. Conclusion: NIV can be used in selected patients with acute neuromuscular respiratory failure while awaiting improvement from specific therapies.

Noninvasive ventilation in acute respiratory failure: a study of clinical outcome and correlates for success

Noninvasive ventilation in acute respiratory failure: a study of clinical outcome and correlates for success

Airway Pressure Release Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Failure Due to COVID-19: No Role, We Still Need More Data.

Airway Pressure Release Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Failure Due to COVID-19: No Role, We Still Need More Data.

Noninvasive Ventilation in Treatment of Respiratory Failure-Related COVID-19 Infection: Review of the Literature

The recently diagnosed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), in December 2019 commonly affects the respiratory system. The incidence of acute hypoxic respiratory failure varied among epidemiological studies with high percentage of patients requiring mechanical ventilation with a high mortality. Noninvasive ventilation is an alternative tool for ventilatory support instead of invasive mechanical ventilation, especially with scarce resources and intensive care beds. Initially, there were concerns by the national societies regarding utilization of noninvasive ventilation in acute respiratory failure. Recent publications reflect the gained experience with the safe utilization of noninvasive mechanical ventilation. Noninvasive ventilation has beneficiary role in treatment of acute hypoxic respiratory failure with proper indications, setting, monitoring, and timely escalation of therapy. Patients should be monitored frequently for signs of improvement or deterioration in the clinical status. Awareness of indications, contraindications, and parameters reflecting either success or failure of noninvasive ventilation in the management of acute respiratory failure secondary to COVID-19 is essential for improvement of outcomes.

Factors Associated with and Prognosis Impact of Perceived Sleep Quality and Estimated Quantity in Patients Receiving Non-Invasive Ventilation for Acute Respiratory Failure.

Background. The objectives of this study were (1) to determine factors associated with impaired sleep and (2) to evaluate the relationship between impaired sleep and the outcome. Methods. Secondary analysis of a prospective observational cohort study in 54 intensive care units in France and Belgium. Sleep quality was quantified by the patients with a semi-quantitative scale. Results. Among the 389 patients included, 40% reported poor sleep during the first night in the ICU and the median (interquartile) total sleep time was 4 h (2–5). Factors independently associated with poor sleep quality were the SOFA score (odds ratio [OR] 0.90, p = 0.037), anxiety (OR 0.43, p = 0.001) and the presence of air leaks (OR 0.52, p = 0.013). Factors independently associated with short-estimated sleep duration (<4 h) were the SOFA score (1.13, p = 0.005), dyspnea on admission (1.13, p = 0.031) and the presence of air leaks (1.92, p = 0.008). Non-invasive ventilation failure was independently associated with poor sleep quality (OR 3.02, p = 0.021) and short sleep duration (OR 0.77, p = 0.001). Sleep quality and duration were not associated with an increase in mortality or length of stay. Conclusions. The sleep of patients with ARF requiring NIV is impaired and is associated with a high rate of NIV failure.

Non-Invasive Mechanical Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Failure: Helmet Interface

Background: Non-invasive mechanical ventilation is one of the most used organ support measures in critical care medicine. Hemet interface has been implemented in everyday practice at ICUs later than classic means of delivery for NIV including face mask. We used helmet interface for first time at ICU and recorded CPAP setting and outcome.&#x0D; Methods: Helmet was used for 9 patients and any complication or side effects were recorded. Also nurses first experience of using the helmet has recorded in a survey.&#x0D; Results: No skin lesion, vomiting, and air leaking were recorded. Also none of the patients complained about claustrophobia, dyspnea, pain, or feeling hot while the helmet was in use. In addition, nursing was easier while using a helmet than it was with face mask.&#x0D; Conclusion: The overall first time use of helmet interface in our department gave us a positive feedback, but more data need to be collected for more effective way of applying NIV and specifically helmet interface.

Science, Medicine, and the Anesthesiologist

Science, Medicine, and the Anesthesiologist