Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Research Articles

Secondary prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE) with low dose apixaban or rivaroxaban in major-thrombophilia carriers.

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are widely used for treatment and secondary prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and represent the gold standard for VTE secondary prophylaxis, with low-intensity DOACs administration becoming increasingly used worldwide in such scenario. Albeit widespread DOACs usage there are few literature data regarding their efficacy and safety in major thrombophilia carriers and almost no data is available for low intensity apixaban and rivaroxaban as secondary VTE prophylaxis in such patients. The aim of our study is to evaluate and confront the efficacy and safety of low-dose DOACs for VTE secondary prophylaxis, in major thrombophilia carriers vs patients at high risk of VTE recurrence for other reasons. We retrospectively evaluated patients who required long-term anticoagulant secondary prophylaxis to prevent recurrent VTE, treated with apixaban 2.5mg BID or rivaroxaban 10mg daily and that were screened for thrombophilia. The examined patients were 339. Baseline characteristics such as sex, age, obesity rate, smoking, number of previous VTEs and comorbidities (such as cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, mild CKD) were equally distributed in either group. The median low-dose DOACs administration time was 19.20months (IQR 12.17-35.67). During low-dose DOACs treatment, 13 (3.8%) VTE recurrences were observed; 14 bleeding events were registered (4,1%), with no major bleeding (MB), 6 clinically relevant non major bleeding (CRNMB) (1.8%) and 8 minor bleeding (2.3%). No statistically significant difference in the rate of VTE recurrence and/or bleeding events emerged between major thrombophilia carriers and non-major thrombophilia carriers. In multivariate analysis increased risk of VTE recurrence was found for patients with cardiovascular comorbidities (HR 4.00 - p = 0.034) and for patients with more than one previous VTE episode (HR 5.14-p = 0.034). Our data suggest that low-dose DOACs may be effective and safe in secondary VTE prophylaxis for carriers of major thrombophilia with no increase in VTE recurrence and/or bleeding risk.

An observational study on the use of low-molecular-weight heparin for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in acute stroke patients

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) including deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) are common complications post-stroke. The UK stroke guidelines recommend the early use of intermittent pneumatic compression devices (IPCDs). At our center, we noticed poor compliance with the use of these devices and sought to develop a pathway for early implementation of low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWH) instead. We retrospectively analyzed the data of 2351 patients in two separate groups and compared both groups to check the incidence of PEs and DVTs as stated on the discharge documentation. Group A consists of 1599 patients who used IPCDs as VTE prophylaxis, whereas Group B involved 752 patients who were placed on the new VTE prophylaxis protocol, which involved the early use of LMWH with enoxaparin delivered subcutaneously. It was observed that IPCDs were not well tolerated by patients, leading to poor compliance with VTE prophylaxis in Group A. VTE compliance was noted to be better in Group B in which the patients were given LMWH in the hospital. Furthermore, symptomatic DVT and PE were not found to be higher in Group B patients, but in fact, the incidence of these conditions was lower in this group. In conclusion, compared to IPCDs, LMWH appears to be well tolerated by patients during the admission period owing to acute stroke. It was observed that the incidence of VTE was reduced in patients who started on early LMWH in the post-stroke period. However, the long-term effects of LMWH prophylaxis, in terms of mortality and morbidity, need to be delineated. Therefore, an additional large trial on the early use of LMWH in comparison to IPCDs is warranted.

Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis after hematopoietic cell transplantation: still a challenge for haematologists and haemostasiologists.

No Abstract.

Risk of Venous Thromboembolism in Adolescents Undergoing Pelvic Osteotomy: Insights From a Propensity-matched Retrospective Cohort Study.

Pelvic osteotomies are surgical procedures that are commonly performed in adolescents and young adults to improve stability or correct various deformities. Venous thromboembolism (VTE), including pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT), are dreaded complications of any major procedure including pelvic osteotomies. Unlike adults, the incidence of DVT and need for prophylactic measures are not well understood in the adolescents. The purpose of this study is to understand the need for VTE prophylaxis in adolescents and determine if their risk profile aligns with adults, who have more established VTE prophylactic guidelines in place for these surgeries. This retrospective cohort study utilized data from the TriNetX Research Network, which includes records from over 80 healthcare organizations and more than 120 million patients. De-identified patient data from January 1, 2003, to March 1, 2024, were extracted using relevant ICD-9 and ICD-10 procedural codes. The study included 2 cohorts: patients aged 13 to 17 years (adolescents) and patients 18 years and older (adults) who underwent pelvic osteotomies. To control for confounding variables, propensity score matching was employed based on sex and relevant comorbidities, including diabetes mellitus, tobacco use, and overweight/obesity. Statistical significance was set at P<0.01. A total of 2374 patients successfully matched in each cohort. Within 90 days following surgical intervention, adult patients had overall risks of 4.5%, 1.9%, and 5.9%, whereas adolescent patients had overall risks of 1.3%, 0.5%, and 1.4% for DVT (RR: 3.419), PE (RR: 4.182), and either DVT or PE (RR: 4.118), respectively. This study examines the rate of VTE in a large cohort of adolescents undergoing pelvic osteotomies. Although we found the rates to be lower in adolescents compared with adults, the high absolute risk in adolescents-above 1%, the threshold established in the literature for considering prophylaxis-underscores the need for tailored risk stratification strategies and targeted thromboprophylaxis protocols for this population. Level III: case-control study or retrospective cohort study.

Factor Xa Inhibitors and Low Molecular Weight Heparins in Perioperative Surgical Thromboprophylaxis: A Network Meta-Analysis.

venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis is crucial for reducing the risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). This network metaanalysis was carried out to determine the most effective intervention among selective Xa inhibitors and low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) for perioperative surgical thromboprophylaxis in major abdominal, pelvic, lumbar spine, and lower limb surgeries. A systematic literature search was conducted for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing selective factor Xa inhibitors, LMWHs, and placebo as thromboprophylaxis agents in major abdominal, pelvic, lumbar spine, and lower limb surgeries. A Bayesian network metaanalysis was performed to compare all interventions for the risk of developing DVT, VTE, major VTE, total bleeding, and major bleeding. The surface under the cumulative ranking curves was used to rank all interventions. Of 1788 retrieved references, 42 RCTs comparing 11 anticoagulants were included. As compared to enoxaparin, the risk of DVT was significantly reduced in patients treated with fondaparinux [RR: 0.53 (95% CrI: 0.31, 0.93)] and rivaroxaban [RR: 0.42 (95% CrI: 0.27, 0.64)]; VTE in patients treated with bemiparin [RR: 0.09 (95% CrI: 0, 0.7)], edoxaban [RR: 0.43 (95% CrI: 0.18, 0.96)], fondaparinux [RR: 0.55 (95% CrI: 0.34, 0.91)] and rivaroxaban [RR: 0.56 (95% CrI: 0.34, 0.85)]; major VTE in patients treated with rivaroxaban [RR: 0.26 (95% CrI: 0.11, 0.6)]. According to the surface under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRA) value, fondaparinux and bemiparin increase the risk of serious bleeding more than other factor Xa inhibitors and LMWHs. Rivaroxaban, fondaparinux, edoxaban, and bemiparin are superior perioperative thromboprophylaxis agents than enoxaparin in major surgeries. Fondaparinux and bemiparin have shown the highest risk of major bleeding compared to other factor Xa inhibitors and LMWHs.

Comparison of Apixaban Versus Enoxaparin for Venous Thromboembolism Prevention After Radical Cystectomy: The CARE Trial

CARE is a pragmatic randomized clinical trial designed to compare adherence, satisfaction, patient out-of-pocket costs, and venous thromboembolism (VTE) rates between apixaban and enoxaparin prescribed as VTE prophylaxis on discharge after radical cystectomy.

Safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants in chronic kidney disease: a meta-analysis

BackgroundDirect oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have emerged as the first-line therapy for venous thromboembolism and stroke prophylaxis in atrial fibrillation. As DOACs are partially excreted renally, their safety in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is unclear. ObjectivesTo synthesize primary evidence on the safety profile of DOACs in patients with CKD. MethodsWe searched MEDLINE and Embase from inception to June 2023 for randomized and nonrandomized cohort studies comparing DOACs with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in CKD patients. Screening and data collection were conducted in duplicate. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding, defined by International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis criteria, stratified by CKD severity. Meta-analysis was done using the Mantel–Haenszel random-effects model, presented as odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95% CIs. ResultsOf the 2355 articles captured in the literature search, 25 nonrandomized studies (n = 6832) and 6 randomized studies (n = 66,898) were included. DOACs reduced major bleeding compared with VKAs in all subgroups (stage 4: OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.58, 0.93; stage 5/renal replacement therapy: OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.50, 0.98; stage unspecified: OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.63, 0.83). Apixaban and rivaroxaban both reduced major bleeding in stage 5/renal replacement therapy patients (apixaban: OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.52, 0.85; rivaroxaban: OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.35, 0.94). ConclusionIn this meta-analysis, DOACs reduced major bleeding compared with VKAs in stage 4, stage 5/renal replacement therapy, and CKD stage unspecified patients. Future analysis should evaluate the impact of specific DOACs and dosage on safety and efficacy in this population.

S1147 Prophylaxis for Venous Thromboembolism Remains Low in Patients Admitted With Severe UC in the Community Setting

S1147 Prophylaxis for Venous Thromboembolism Remains Low in Patients Admitted With Severe UC in the Community Setting

Venous thromboembolism secondary prophylaxis in elderly people (over 75-year-old) with low-dose direct oral anticoagulants: single-center Italian experience

Nowadays, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) represent the gold standard for venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment and VTE secondary prophylaxis; nevertheless, the percentage of elderly patients in major trials and literature data about DOACs usage for VTE secondary prophylaxis in the elderly are scant. Our retrospective study tried to evaluate low-dose DOACs efficacy and safety for elderly VTE secondary prophylaxis in a real-life setting. A cohort of 73 patients (≥ 75 years) considered at high risk of VTE recurrence was treated with apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily (b.i.d.) or rivaroxaban 10 mg daily as VTE secondary prophylaxis. The median low-dose DOACs administration time was 18.40 months. Three (4.1%) VTE recurrence events were observed, with four bleeding events registered (5.5%), including one major bleeding (MB) (1.4%) and two clinically relevant non major bleeding (CRNMB) (2.7%). Our data suggest that low-dose DOACs may be effective and well tolerated for secondary VTE prophylaxis in elderly patients at high risk of VTE recurrence.

Utilising a modified accelerated Delphi process to develop a national multidisciplinary consensus on peri-operative optimisation of patients with obesity undergoing non-bariatric surgery

BackgroundIn the last three decades, the worldwide prevalence of obesity has increased by threefold. Using a modified Delphi consensus technique, the Irish Surgical Research Collaborative (ISRC) aimed to formulate consensus guidelines on the peri-operative optimisation of patients with obesity undergoing non-bariatric surgery. MethodsSubgroups within the ISRC were established to formulate consensus statements using a nominal group technique (NGT) to address the three domains of pre-operative, intra-operative and post-operative care. Three Delphi rounds were circulated nationally to multidisciplinary members of the peri-operative team via electronic survey. Consensus was considered achieved for any statement with >80 % agreement. Data was analysed using Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corp, Redmond, WA). ResultsFollowing three Delphi rounds, a total of 94 statements centred around optimising peri-operative care for patients with obesity undergoing non-bariatric surgery reached consensus. Pre-operatively, access to prehabilitation, use of pre-operative risk stratification tools and strategies to reduce obesity-related co-morbidities were all deemed important along with nomination of a hospital obesity lead. Intra-operatively, the prioritised domains were involvement of consultant anaesthetist and surgeon for safe and considered patient positioning, utilisation of minimally invasive surgical techniques, adherence to venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and surgical site infection prevention strategies as well as adoption of multimodal analgesia. Appropriate analgesia prescription, nutritional support, enhanced recovery after surgery and the role of physiotherapy were all deemed essential elements of post-operative care. ConclusionAs a multidisciplinary peri-operative group, through Delphi consensus, we report agreed perioperative standards to optimise the perioperative care of patients with obesity undergoing non-bariatric surgery. This consensus can be utilised to standardise clinical practice and identify areas for quality improvement.

S1249 Quality Improvement: VTE Prophylaxis for Inflammatory Bowel Disease Admissions - Room for Improvement

S1249 Quality Improvement: VTE Prophylaxis for Inflammatory Bowel Disease Admissions - Room for Improvement

Venous Thromboembolism Risk Assessment and Thromboprophylaxis Practice in Hospitalized Medical Patients: The Experience of a Singapore Teaching Hospital

AbstractDespite the availability of institutional guidelines, the practice of venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk assessment and thromboprophylaxis remains inadequate in Singapore. With hospital-associated VTE (HA-VTE) being a common cause of preventable mortality for medical patients, it is vital for prompt, appropriate prescription of thromboprophylaxis after VTE risk assessment. This study aimed to (1) assess the local practice of VTE risk assessment and prophylaxis according to institutional guidelines, (2) study the risk factors of potential preventable HA-VTE among hospitalized medical patients, and (3) improve the quality of care with respect to early prevention of HA-VTE. An audit was performed on daily new admissions to two general medical wards in a teaching hospital in Singapore (total capacity of 76 beds) over 2 weeks. Each new admission's medical records were reviewed to examine whether (1) VTE risk assessment was performed by the managing medical teams, (2) thromboprophylaxis was prescribed during admission in high VTE risk patients, and (3) any contraindications to pharmacological thromboprophylaxis for cases with high VTE risk but no pharmacological thromboprophylaxis prescribed was present. Only 1 out of 52 cases had VTE risk assessment performed. Thirty-one cases (59.1%) were identified to have high VTE risk using the Padua Prediction Score. However, only 1 out of the 31 cases (3.2%) had VTE prophylaxis prescribed. Adherence to local institutional guidelines remains poor despite increasing awareness of the importance of VTE risk assessment and prophylaxis in the prevention of associated morbidity and mortality. Certain patient profiles should prompt clinicians to perform VTE risk assessment.

Pulmonary Embolism in the Post-partum Period: A Case Report

Background: One well-known hypercoagulable state that raises the risk of venous thromboembolism is pregnancy and it is more common in cesarean delivery. Pulmonary embolisms are difficult to identify based solely on postpartum symptoms. Most of the symptoms are non-specific, therefore they are typically underdiagnosed throughout pregnancy and the postpartum period. Objective: This work presented information on the treatment of high-risk pulmonary embolism in the postpartum phase. Case presentation: This paper reported the case of a 33-year-old female, admitted to the emergency room for shortness of breath. Her personal history showed that she had just given birth to her sixth child by caesarian section a month ago and had a history of hysterectomy due to severe infection. Result: She suffered a high-risk pulmonary embolism in the post-partum period. It takes a strong index of suspicion to diagnose and treat patients in a timely manner. Conclusion: Echocardiography and Multislice Computerized Tomography are the best diagnostic methods. Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis should be taken into account, particularly in patients who have risk factors.

Development and Implementation of a Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Protocol in the Rehabilitation Setting – A Completed Audit Cycle

Abstract Background 63% of all Venous Thromboembolic disease (VTE) is hospital-acquired, and 70% of hospital-acquired VTE is potentially preventable with appropriate prophylaxis. NICE recommends a VTE risk assessment for all patients admitted to acute hospitals within 24 hours. Validated risk assessment models for acute hospitals enhance provision of thromboprophylaxis, but no such protocols exist for the rehabilitation setting. The aims of this audit were to determine if VTE risk assessments are occurring on admission and during acute illness in rehabilitation wards, to assess the proportion of rehabilitation inpatients receiving VTE prophylaxis, and to develop and pilot a VTE Prophylaxis Protocol. Methods An initial audit was carried out on three rehabilitation wards in May/June 2023. A VTE Prophylaxis Protocol was developed based on the HSE VTE Prevention Program template, incorporated into the admission booklet on 3 pilot wards in February 2024, and practice re-audited in April 2024. Results Pre-intervention, 41 patient records were assessed. 0 patients (0%) had a documented VTE risk assessment on admission, 23(56%) had therapeutic anticoagulation continued, and 3(7%) commenced appropriate VTE prophylaxis on admission. 8 eligible at-risk patients did not receive prophylaxis. Post intervention, all patients (n=25) on the three pilot wards were re-audited. 10 patients (40%) had a documented VTE Risk assessment within 24 hours of admission, 9(36%) had therapeutic anticoagulation continued, and 5(20%) received appropriate VTE prophylaxis on admission (2 without a documented risk assessment). 3 at-risk patients did not receive prophylaxis (1 with a completed risk assessment), and 1 risk-assessed patient inappropriately received prophylaxis. Conclusion Implementation of a VTE Prophylaxis Protocol improved VTE risk assessment in rehabilitation. This small sample however did not demonstrate an association between prophylaxis prescription and use of the protocol. Further education and feedback is required to increase use of the protocol as part of this ongoing quality improvement project.

Association between bariatric surgery preoperative chemoprophylaxis and postoperative bleeding.

Use of chemoprophylaxis for prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after bariatric surgery is a generally accepted principle; however, the optimal strategy in terms of medication type and pre- and postoperative dosing is uncertain. In our healthcare system, four hospitals performed bariatric surgery and utilized differing protocols for VTE prophylaxis. The analysis sought to evaluate the association of differing prophylaxis strategies on bleeding and VTE occurrence. Adult patients who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) from 2018 to 2021 at four hospitals were studied. Patients were grouped by whether or not they received preoperative chemoprophylaxis. The primary outcome was postoperative bleeding, defined as requiring a blood transfusion or reoperation for bleeding within 30days. Bivariate analyses were performed with Chi-square and Wilcoxon Rank tests where applicable. Multivariate logistic regression was performed for the outcome of postoperative bleeding. A total of 2145 bariatric surgeries were evaluated (33.6% RYGB, 66.4% SG). Among 1712 patients who underwent surgery at Hospitals A, B, and C, 93.1% received preoperative VTE prophylaxis, compared with 1 patient (0.1%) among 433 patients operated on at Hospital D. Postoperative bleeding occurred more frequently in patients who received preoperative VTE prophylaxis versus those who did not (3.7% vs 1.1%; p < 0.01). After multivariable regression analysis, only RYGB (OR 3.59; p < 0.01) and preoperative VTE prophylaxis (OR 3.54; p = 0.02) were significantly associated with postoperative bleeding. Rates of VTE for patients receiving preoperative VTE prophylaxis or no prophylaxis were not significantly different (0.6% vs. 0.2%; p = 0.26). Preoperative VTE prophylaxis prior to bariatric surgery was associated with postoperative bleeding without differences in VTE occurrence. These results call into question the routine use of VTE chemoprophylaxis for all patients undergoing bariatric surgery and favor selective usage.

Practice variation in venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in adolescent trauma patients: A comparative analysis of pediatric, adult, and mixed trauma centers

IntroductionAdolescent trauma patients are at increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). It is unclear whether VTE prophylaxis practice patterns differ across trauma center types. MethodsThe ACS-TQP database was queried for patients aged 12-17 admitted to a pediatric, adult, or mixed level I/II trauma center. VTE prophylaxis was compared between center types. Preplanned subgroup analyses were performed to evaluate guideline adherence. ResultsOf 101,010 patients included, 35 ​% were treated at a pediatric trauma center (PTC), 43 ​% at a mixed trauma center (MTC), and 22 ​% at an adult trauma center (ATC). VTE prophylaxis was more common at ATCs and MTCs compared to PTCs (51.0 ​% vs 24.9 ​% vs 5.0 ​%,p ​< ​0.001). This trend persisted in subgroup analyses of patients aged 16–17 (63.8 ​% vs 40.5 ​% vs 6.4 ​%,p ​< ​0.001) and with injury severity score greater than 25 (83.8 ​% vs 74.0 ​% vs 35.1 ​%,p ​< ​0.001). ConclusionVTE prophylaxis is administered more frequently to adolescent trauma patients treated at ATCs and MTCs compared to PTCs despite published guidelines. Prospective studies are needed to assess the clinical utility of VTE prophylaxis in the adolescent trauma population.

Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Maxillofacial Surgery.

The aim of this article is to conduct a literature review concerning the need for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis among patients undergoing maxillofacial surgery. This article addresses the diagnosis of VTE, patient risk stratification, and prophylactic measures suitable for the various groups of interest in maxillofacial surgery. From a pool of 44 articles identified, nine were chosen as the most pertinent to the aims of this review.Despite limited data on this topic, individuals undergoing oral and maxillofacial surgery generally exhibit a low risk of VTE. This review emphasizes the importance of implementing prophylactic measures tailored to individual risk factors. Pharmacological prophylaxis merits consideration, particularly when the Caprini score is ≥7. However, further research is needed to optimize prophylactic strategies in maxillofacial surgery.

Evaluating chemical venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in trauma patients at a single Australian center.

Trauma patients are at an elevated risk of developing venous thromboembolism (VTE), with the subsequent mortality in patients requiring intensive care unit admission ranging from 25% to 38%. There remains significant variability in clinical practice related to VTE prophylaxis in trauma patients due to the frequent presence of contraindications impacting the timing and consistency of application. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of the current practice of chemical VTE prophylaxis in trauma patients at a single Australian center. A prospective review was conducted on patients admitted to the ACT Trauma Service (Canberra, Australia) from July to November 2022. The included patients were 18 years or older, without a direct contraindication to anticoagulation, who received chemical VTE prophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin (enoxaparin) for at least three doses and underwent subsequent testing of anti-factor Xa (aFXa) levels. During the study period, 187 patients were admitted, of whom 63 were included in the study. Of these, 47 patients achieved therapeutic levels of anticoagulation as determined by their aFXa levels, while 16 were subtherapeutic. The only statistically significant difference between the two groups was in weight, with patients in the subtherapeutic group weighing an average of 91.9 kg compared to 79.1 kg in the therapeutic group (P<0.05). A fixed-dose enoxaparin regimen was utilized, with limited individualization based on patient factors, such as injuries, comorbidities, and other biological factors. Sixteen patients (25%) had subtherapeutic VTE prophylaxis, as measured by aFXa levels. Higher weight was significantly correlated with inadequate VTE prophylaxis dosing. While age, sex, and smoking status might play important roles in clinical decision-making, weight-based dosing of low-molecular-weight heparin may be more effective in achieving adequate VTE prophylaxis.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of direct oral anticoagulants versus low-molecular-weight heparin and no thromboprophylaxis in primary prevention of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism in China.

Cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (CAVTE) is a preventable, life-threatening complication with a considerable morbidity and mortality. Primary venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis is currently recommended; however, the health and economic benefits have not been evaluated and compared in China. This study aimed to assess and compare the cost-effectiveness of anticoagulants in primary CAVTE prevention among cancer patients in China. A Markov model with a 5-year horizon was established to evaluate the costs and effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) compared to low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) and no prevention in primary prophylaxis of CAVTE in China. Key clinical outcomes were obtained from the available clinical trials, comparing DOACs (rivaroxaban and apixaban) with LMWHs or with no thromboprophylaxis. Utility and the cost inputs were all obtained from the published literature or local data with public sources. The total costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were estimated as the main endpoints of the modal for each strategy. The assessment of uncertainty was performed involving deterministic sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA). Impact of time horizon, generic drug price, and individual DOACs were assessed in scenario and subgroup analyses. Primary prophylaxis using DOACs were projected to yield 1.866 QALYs at a cost of $3,287.893, resulting in the ICERs of $12,895.851 (DOACs vs. no-thromboprophylaxis) and $43,613.184/QALYs (LMWHs vs. DOACs). Sensitivity analysis revealed that ICER was sensitive to the VTE and bleeding risk, drug cost of anticoagulants, self-payment ratio, and overall death rate of cancer. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that DOACs and LMWHs had a 48% and 45% probability of being cost-effective at a 5-year time horizon, respectively. When the time horizon extended to 10 years, DOACs achieved a cost-effective probability of 43%. Among individual DOACs, apixaban was found to be the preferred strategy in VTE prevention due to its incremental health gain with an acceptable cost increase. Primary thromboprophylaxis with DOACs was cost-effective in cancer patients at a willing-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $37,125.24/QALY in China. Cancer death rate, risk of VTE and major bleeding, and the drug cost assumed greater relevance and importance in the decision-making process for primary thromboprophylaxis in cancer.

Women-specific aspects of venous thromboembolism

Women have a higher lifetime risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) than men. Hormone-associated risk factors such as pregnancy, contraception and hormone replacement therapy contribute significantly to this. Contraception with combined hormonal contraception increases the risk of VTE in young women, with the extent of the increase in risk being determined by the level of the estrogen dose and the progestin component. After hormone associated VTE, temporary anticoagulation is sufficient in many cases, provided there are no additional persistent risk factors. Affected women should be informed that the risk of VTE recurrence is increased in a subsequent pregnancy and usually requires VTE prophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin during pregnancy. If the suspicion of recurrent VTE arises during pregnancy, diagnostics must be carried out promptly so that deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism can be reliably confirmed or ruled out.