Venous Thromboembolic Events Research Articles

Development of venous thromboembolic event risk calculator for metabolic and bariatric surgery patients to reduce mortality

IntroductionVenous thromboembolic events (VTEs) after Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (MBS) result in significant morbidity and are the leading cause of mortality. The objective of this study was to identify patients who are at a high risk for developing VTE and who may benefit from extended chemoprophylaxis following MBS. MethodsUsing the 2015-2019 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) participant user file (PUF), we identified 696,069 patients who completed 30-day follow-up data and met the inclusion criteria. Using logistic regression analysis, we identified preoperative and postoperative risk factors associated with VTE and validated our model externally using the MBSAQIP 2020-2021 datasets (N = 273,692). The Hosmer–Lemeshow test was used for goodness of fit and calibration. We also compared our model’s discriminatory capability with that of other VTE risk assessment tools. We then used these risk factors to create an online open source application. ResultsThe overall incidence of VTE after MBS in the 696,069 (MBSAQIP 2015-2019 database) patients included in our analysis was .40% (2759 patients). Our model had a good predictive capability, with a C-statistic of .66. Our model also demonstrated good fit with a Hosmer–Lemeshow chi-square of 11.06 (P = .198). A cut-off point of .4% resulted in a sensitivity of 48.28%, with 24% of patients having a VTE risk greater than .4% within the 2015-2019 MBSAQIP dataset. Among all the perioperative factors selected in the PUF, high risk for VTE included African American race (AOR 1.625, P < .0001), operation length in minutes (AOR: 1.003, P < .0001), preop functional status (AOR 1.012, P = .007), procedure type (RYGB; AOR .768, P < .0001 and RBS; AOR .758, P = .019 with respect to sleeve), preop body mass index (BMI) (AOR 1.012, P < .001), history of pre-op vein thrombosis requiring therapy (AOR 5.041, P < .0001), post-op superficial or organ space surgical site infection (AOR 2.713, P < .0001), preop venous stasis (AOR 1.425, P = .019),at least one readmission within 30 days(AOR 1.583, P < .0001), or at least one reoperation within 30 days (AOR 4.399, P < .0001). ConclusionVTE after MBS can result in increased mortality rates. High-risk patients might benefit from extended chemoprophylaxis. Our model suggests that patients with a VTE risk ≥ .4% in the first 30 days following surgery may benefit from extended chemoprophylaxis.

Aggregate Index of Systemic Inflammation: The Strongest Predictor of In-Hospital Venous Thromboembolism Events among Patients Hospitalized for Trauma or Surgery

BackgroundTo investigate the power of inflammation/immune indices in-hospital deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and any venous thromboembolism event (VTE: DVT + pulmonary emboli; PE) that may occur after trauma or surgery and to identify the strongest predictors. MethodsThis was a retrospective study conducted between January 2020 and December 2022. A total of 216 patients with suspicion of DVT or PE during their hospital stay for trauma or surgery were included in the study. Monocyte-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), systemic inflammatory index (SII), systemic inflammation response index (SIRI), and aggregate index of systemic inflammation (AISI) were calculated. Participants were divided into the following 3 groups: Those without DVT or PE (Control group, n = 70), only DVT (DVT group, n = 71), and both DVT and PE (VTE group, n = 75). ResultsThe median D-dimer, NLR, PLR, MLR, SII, SIRI and AISI values of VTE group were significantly higher than both the control and DVT groups (p< 0.001 for all). The DVT group also had significantly higher values for these parameters compared to controls (p<0.001 for all). All of these indices had significantly high performance to detect DVT or PE (p<0.001 for all). Despite very high performance (some exceeding D-dimer measurement) detected for all examined parameters, AISI was the best predictor in both DVT and VTE (DVT + PE) prediction (AUC = 0.995 and 0.959, respectively) ConclusionThese indices, especially AISI, can play a role in the initial screening and risk stratification of patients at high risk of DVT or VTE after surgery or trauma.

Apixaban as a Secondary Prophylaxis Agent for Patent Foramen Ovale-Associated Stroke.

Background: The purpose of this case report is to describe a case of switching warfarin to apixaban in a patient on anticoagulant prophylaxis for a patent foramen ovale (PFO)-associated stroke. Case Summary: An 86-year-old Afro-Latina female with a past medical history of cerebrovascular accident (CVA) in 2012 secondary to PFO and diagnosed Atrial Fibrillation (AF). Patient was switched from warfarin to apixaban after 3months of labile international normalized ratio (INR) levels. The patient's INR was monitored at a pharmacist-led anticoagulation clinic. As the patient's INR remained subtherapeutic while on warfarin, a shared decision was made to switch the patient to apixaban 2.5mg twice daily due to consistently painful enoxaparin injections, inconsistent vitamin K intake, frequent clinic visits and unstable renal function. Patient tolerated the anticoagulant switch well and reported satisfaction with decreased clinic visits and variable vitamin K diet. At 12months post-switch, the patient's complete blood count remains stable, no reported signs and symptoms of bleeding, and no new CVA or venous thromboembolism (VTE) events identified. Based on an improvement in renal function, the dose was increased to 5mg twice daily.

COVID-19 venous thromboembolism prophylaxis guidelines in pediatrics

IntroductionSARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) infection and multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) are risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Guidelines for VTE prophylaxis were established at our institution at the beginning of the pandemic. Patients who had any VTE risk factors in addition to COVID-19 met criteria for anticoagulation prophylaxis. Patients who were diagnosed with MIS-C met criteria regardless of additional risk factors. Materials and methodsWe conducted a retrospective review of patients admitted with COVID-19 or MIS-C to determine compliance with VTE prophylaxis guidelines and to evaluate the incidence of VTE and bleeding events in our population. Results and conclusionsAmong a total of 678 patients admitted with COVID-19 or MIS-C, 519 (76 %) patients met criteria for VTE prophylaxis and 348 (65.6 %) started prophylaxis. Logistic regression analysis identified a personal or family history of thrombosis or thrombophilia, diagnosis of MIS-C, admission to the intensive care unit, and presence of a central venous catheter as significantly associated with starting VTE prophylaxis. There were 18 patients who developed VTE. Minor bleeding events occurred in 19 patients (5 %), patient important bleeding, no intervention occurred in 8 patients (2 %), clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding in 8 patients (2 %), and major bleeding in 10 patients (3 %). The incidence of VTE in our patients with COVID-19 and MIS-C is similar to VTE rates at other institutions. We found that universally recognized VTE risk factors were appropriate to include as risk factors for thrombosis in hospitalized children with COVID-19 and MIS-C.

Harms with placebo in trials of biological therapies and small molecules as maintenance therapy in inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Randomised placebo-controlled trials for the induction of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remission involve potential harms to those receiving placebo. Whether these harms are also apparent with placebo during maintenance of remission trials in IBD is unclear. We aimed to examine the potential harms associated with receiving placebo in trials of licensed biologics and small molecules for maintenance of remission of ulcerative colitis and luminal Crohn's disease in a meta-analysis. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched several medical literature databases including MEDLINE (from Jan 1, 1946, to May 31, 2024), Embase and Embase Classic (Jan 1, 1947, to May 31, 2024), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from database inception to May 31, 2024, for randomised placebo-controlled trials of licensed biologics and small molecules for maintenance of remission in adults with IBD reporting data on adverse events over a period of 20 weeks or more. There were no language restrictions or prespecified exclusion criteria. We extracted summary data and pooled data using a random-effects model for any treatment-emergent adverse event, drug-related adverse event, infection, worsening of IBD activity, withdrawal due to adverse events, serious adverse events, serious infection, serious worsening of IBD activity, or venous thromboembolic events, reporting relative risks (RRs) for placebo versus active drug with 95% CIs for each outcomes. The protocol for this meta-analysis was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024542624). Our search identified 10 826 citations, of which 45 trials including 16 562 patients (10 319 [62·3%] receiving active drug and 6243 [37·7%] placebo) were eligible. The risks of any treatment-emergent adverse event (7297/9546 [76·4%] patients on active drug vs 4415/5850 [75·5%] on placebo; RR 1·01, 95% CI 0·99-1·04; I2 =47%), serious infection (260/10 242 [2·5%] vs 155/6149 [2·5%]; 0·97, 0·79-1·19; I2 =0%), or venous thromboembolic event (12/4729 [0·3%] vs 9/2691 [0·3%]; 0·72, 0·31-1·66; I2 =0%) were not significantly lower with active drug than placebo. The risks of any infection (3208/8038 [39·9%] vs 1713/4809 [35·6%]; 1·14, 1·05-1·23; I2 =60%) or any drug-related adverse event (1094/2997 [36·5%] vs 609/1950 [31·2%]; 1·24, 1·02-1·50; I2 =75%) were higher with active drug than placebo. However, the risks of any worsening of IBD activity (1038/8090 [12·8%] vs 1181/5191 [22·8%]; 0·58, 0·52-0·64; I2 =40%), any withdrawal due to adverse events (610/10 282 [5·9%] vs 561/6207 [9·0%]; 0·71, 0·60-0·84; I2 =43%), any serious adverse events (1066/10 292 [10·4%] vs 742/6198 [12·0%]; 0·85, 0·77-0·94; I2 =17%), or any serious worsening of IBD activity (101/5707 [1·8%] vs 143/3640 [3·9%]; 0·55, 0·42-0·71; I2 =0%) were lower with active drug than placebo. 21 randomised controlled trials were judged as low risk of bias across all domains. In maintenance of remission trials in IBD, placebo was associated with some clinically significant potential harms. Patients should be counselled about these before participating in clinical trials and consideration given to alternative designs to test novel drugs in IBD. None.

Harms with placebo in trials of biological therapies and small molecules as induction therapy in inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Randomised placebo-controlled trials are the gold standard to assess novel drugs in ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. However, there might be risks associated with receiving placebo. We aimed to examine the harms associated with receiving placebo in trials of licensed biologics and small molecules for the induction of remission in ulcerative colitis and luminal Crohn's disease in a meta-analysis. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Embase Classic, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from database inception to May 30, 2024, for randomised placebo-controlled trials of licensed biologics and small molecules for induction of remission in adults (≥18 years) with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis or luminal Crohn's disease reporting data on adverse events over a minimum treatment period of 4 weeks. There were no prespecified study exclusion criteria. We extracted summary data and pooled data using a random-effects model for any treatment-emergent adverse event, any drug-related adverse event, infection, worsening of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) activity, withdrawal due to adverse events, serious adverse events, serious infection, serious worsening of IBD activity, or venous thromboembolic events (VTEs), reporting relative risks (RRs) with 95% CIs. The protocol for this meta-analysis was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024527341). The search identified 10 826 citations, of which 47 trials including 20 987 patients (14 267 [68·0%] receiving active drug and 6720 [32·0%] receiving placebo) were eligible. The risk of any treatment-emergent adverse event was no different with active drug than with placebo (7660/14 267 [53·7%] patients on active drug vs 3758/6720 [55·9%] on placebo; RR 0·97, 95% CI 0·94-1·00; I2 =36%). However, the risks of worsening of IBD activity (563/13 473 [4·2%] vs 530/6252 [8·5%]; 0·48, 0·40-0·59; I2 =54%), withdrawal due to adverse event (401/13 363 [3·0%] vs 299/6267 [4·8%]; 0·62, 0·48-0·79; I2 =46%), serious adverse event (682/14 267 [4·8%] vs 483/6720 [7·2%]; 0·69, 0·59-0·80; I2 =30%), serious infection (140/14 194 [1·0%] vs 91/6647 [1·4%]; 0·67, 0·50-0·89; I2 =0%), serious worsening of IBD activity (187/11 271 [1·7%] vs 189/5056 [3·7%]; 0·45, 0·34-0·60; I2 =27%), or VTEs (13/7542 [0·2%] vs 12/2981 [0·4%]; 0·45, 0·21-0·94; I2 =0%) were all significantly lower with active drug than placebo. Numbers needed to treat with active drug to avoid these potentially serious adverse events ranged from 23 for worsening of IBD activity to 452 for VTEs. 27 randomised controlled trials were judged as low risk of bias across all domains. Patients with moderately to severely active IBD receiving placebo are more likely to experience significant worsening of IBD activity and some serious adverse events, which might relate to a reduction in risk of these events with active drug. Patients should be counselled about these potential harms, and alternative trial designs to mitigate these harms should be considered. None.

Unravelling the Causal Relationship between Endometriosis and the Risk for Developing Venous Thromboembolism: A Pooled Analysis.

To investigate the effect of endometriosis on venous thromboembolism (VTE) in oral contraceptive (OC) users. Pooled analysis on a harmonized dataset compromising international patient-centric cohort studies: INAS-VIPOS, INAS-SCORE, and INAS-FOCUS. Eleven European countries, the United States, and Canada. Individuals being newly prescribed an OC with or without an endometriosis and no VTE history. Detailed information was captured using self-administered questionnaires at baseline and every 6 to 12 months thereafter. Self-reported VTEs were medically validated and reviewed by an independent adjudication committee. Incidence rates (IRs) were calculated per 10,000 woman-years. The association of endometriosis on VTE was determined in a time-to-event analysis, calculating crude and adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). A total of 22,072 women had an endometriosis diagnosis, and 91,056 women did not. Women with endometriosis contributed 78,751 woman-years during which 41 VTE events occurred (IR: 5.2/10,000, 95% CI: 3.7-7.1) compared to 127 VTEs during 310,501 woman-years in women without endometriosis (IR: 4.1/10,000, 95% CI: 3.4-4.9). The hazard ratio of VTE in women with endometriosis was 1.79 (95% CI: 1.24-2.57) using stabilized IPTW controlling for age, body mass index, smoking, education, age at menarche, and family history of VTE. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses showed similar results. These results highlight the importance of considering endometriosis as a potential factor contributing to VTE in women using OC; however, further research on the relationship between endometriosis and VTE is warranted.

Venous Thromboembolism Incidence, Risk Factors, and Prophylaxis in Burn Patients: a National Trauma Database Study.

Comprehensive studies on the incidence, risk factors, and prophylactic measures related to venous thromboembolism (VTE) are lacking in burn care. This study characterizes VTE risk and existing prevention measures to improve and inform overall patient care in the field of burn care on a national scale. The US National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) was queried from 2007 to 2021 to identify burn-injured patients. Descriptive statistics and multivariate regression analyses were used to explore the association between demographic/clinical characteristics and VTE risk as well as compare various VTE chemoprophylaxis types. There were 326,614 burn-injured patients included for analysis; 5,642 (1.7%) experienced a VTE event during their hospitalization. Patients with VTE were significantly older, had greater BMIs and %TBSA, and were more likely to be male (p<0.001). History of smoking, hypertension or myocardial infarction, and/or substance use disorder were significant predictors of VTE (p<0.001). Patients who received low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) were less likely to have VTE compared to patients treated with heparin when controlling for other VTE risk factors (OR: .564 95% CI .523-.607, p<0.001). Longer time to VTE chemoprophylaxis (>6 hours) initiation was significantly associated with VTE (OR=1.04 95% CI 1.03=1.07, p<0.001). This study sheds light on risk factors and chemoprophylaxis in VTE to help guide clinical practice when implementing prevention strategies in burn patients. This knowledge can be leveraged to refine risk stratification models, inform evidence-based prevention strategies, and ultimately enhance the quality of care for burn patients at risk of VTE.

Pharmacist Use of a Population Management Dashboard for Safe Anticoagulant Prescribing: Evaluation of a Nationwide Implementation Effort.

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have complex dosing regimens and are often incorrectly prescribed. We evaluated a nationwide DOAC population management dashboard rollout whose purpose includes pharmacist review and correction of off-label dosing prescriptions. Using data from Veterans Health Affairs, we identified all patients prescribed DOACs for atrial fibrillation or venous thromboembolism between August 2015 and December 2019. Sites were grouped on the basis of the timing of moderate-high usage of the DOAC population management tool dashboard. Effectiveness was defined as the monthly rate of off-label DOAC prescribing and the rate of clinical adverse events (bleeding, composite of stroke or venous thromboembolism). Implementation was evaluated as the percentage of off-label DOAC prescriptions changed within 7 days. Among the 128 652 patients receiving DOAC therapy at 123 centers, between 6.9% and 8.6% had off-label DOAC prescriptions. Adoption of the DOAC population management tool dashboard before July 2018 was associated with a decline in off-label dosing prescriptions (8.7%-7.6%). Only 1 group demonstrated a significant reduction in monthly rates of bleeding following implementation. All sites experienced a reduction in the composite of venous thromboembolism or stroke following dashboard adoption. There was no difference in the implementation outcome of DOAC prescription change within 7 days in any of the adoption groups. Early adoption of the DOAC population management tool dashboard was associated with decreased rates of off-label DOAC dosing prescription and reduced bleeding. Following adoption of the DOAC population management tool dashboard, all sites experienced reductions in venous thromboembolism and stroke events.

Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in Patients With Hemophilia A: Greater Odds of Postoperative Bleeding and Thromboembolic Events but No Difference in 5-year Implant Survival.

Patients with hemophilia A can develop joint hemarthroses, degenerative changes, and eventually undergo total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). Few data exist concerning complications and prosthesis survival after TSA in this population. (1) Is hemophilia A associated with more bleeding and thromboembolic adverse events after TSA relative to matched controls? (2) Is 5-year TSA prosthesis survival reduced in patients with hemophilia A compared with matched controls? The 2010 to 2022 PearlDiver M161 database was used to identify patients who underwent primary anatomic or reverse TSA. Given that the X-linked recessive condition hemophilia A presents nearly exclusively in males, male patients with hemophilia A who underwent TSA were matched 1:10 with male patients without hemophilia who underwent TSA based on age and Elixhauser comorbidity index (ECI). This yielded 73 patients with hemophilia A who underwent TSA who were matched 1:10 with 729 patients without hemophilia. Ninety-day adverse events were compared with multivariable analysis. Revision within 5 years was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Compared with the control cohort, patients with hemophilia had greater odds of bleeding issues (hematoma, OR 6.8 [95% CI 3.0 to 15.3]; p < 0.001; anemia, OR 2.5 [95% CI 1.5 to 4.2]; p < 0.001, transfusion, OR 5.0 [95% CI 2.4 to 10.3]; p < 0.001), venous thromboembolic events (VTE) (OR 1.9 [95% CI 1.1 to 3.1]; p = 0.01), and prosthetic loosening (OR 3.5 [95% CI 1.4 to 8.0]; p = 0.004). Based on available data, 5-year implant survival was not different in patients with hemophilia (97.3% [95% CI 93.6% to 100.0%]) relative to matched controls (95.2% [95% CI 93.4% to 97.2%]; p = 0.60). The elevated risks of both 90-day bleeding complications (hematoma, anemia, and transfusion) and VTE (DVT and PE) in patients with hemophilia emphasize the special challenges of carefully balancing factor replacement and VTE prophylaxis pre-, intra-, and postoperatively on an individual patient basis with careful hematologist coordination. Further study on Factor VIII levels and targets as well as tranexamic acid and VTE prophylaxis in this population is necessary to provide further guidance. Furthermore, 5-year implant survival was not different between patients with hemophilia and matched controls (patients without hemophilia) based on available data, suggesting that TSA survivorship remains durable and may be offered to patients in this population as indicated. Level III, therapeutic study.

Risk factors that limit use of oral JAK inhibitors in chronic hand eczema: Findings from the Danish Skin Cohort

BackgroundOral Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) have black-box warnings of infections, cancer risk, cardiovascular and venous thromboembolic events. They may be used off-label for chronic hand eczema (CHE). ObjectivesAssess prevalence of risk factors potentially impacting oral JAKi safety in CHE patients. MethodsIn the Danish Skin Cohort, CHE patients were examined for risk factors affecting oral JAKi use at baseline and followed for 12 months. Data were collected through register linkage (e.g., cancer history) and through patient interviews (e.g., smoking habits). ResultsOf 941 adults with CHE (66.2% women; mean age 55.5 [standard deviation 13.3] years), 768 (81.6%) patients had at least one risk factor potentially impacting oral JAKi use, of which 682 (72.5%) had non-modifiable risk factors. Most common risk factors were current or former heavy smoking (62.8%, n=591), obesity (28.1%, n=264), hypercholesterolemia (21.5%, n=202), and hypertension (18.8%, n=177). Among patients without any risk factors at baseline (n=173), 20.2% (n=35) developed ≥1 risk factor during the following 12 months. LimitationsCertain risk factors may be underreported. ConclusionMost CHE patients have risk factors limiting appropriateness of oral JAKi use. Health care providers should assess risk factors in their patients when choosing treatment for CHE.

Enhanced venous thrombosis and hypercoagulability in murine and human metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis

BackgroundPatients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) are at an increased risk of developing venous thromboembolic events, including deep vein thrombosis (DVT). To date, the study of DVT in MASH has been hampered by the lack of reliable models that mimic the pathologic aspects of human disease. ObjectivesTo evaluate DVT severity and hypercoagulability in murine and human MASH. MethodsTranscriptional changes in the liver, plasma markers of coagulation, and DVT severity were evaluated in mice fed a standard chow diet or a high-fructose, high-fat, and high-cholesterol MASH diet for 24 weeks. Plasma analyses of coagulation markers and thrombin generation assays were performed in a well-characterized cohort of patients with or without MASH. ResultsMice fed the MASH diet developed steatohepatitis and fibrosis, mimicking human MASH. Liver RNA sequencing revealed a significant upregulation of pathways related to inflammation and coagulation concomitant with increased levels of plasma coagulation markers including increased prothrombin fragment 1+2, thrombin-antithrombin complex, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 levels, and endothelin 1. MASH exacerbated DVT severity in mice, as evidenced by increased thrombus weight and higher thrombosis incidence (15/15 vs 11/15 in controls, P = .0317). Higher endothelin 1 release and increased apoptosis were found in endothelial cells stimulated with supernatants of palmitate-stimulated HepG2 cells. Patients with MASH exhibited increased levels of plasma coagulation markers and delayed thrombin generation. ConclusionWe report enhanced DVT severity and hypercoagulability, both in murine and human MASH. Our model of MASH-DVT can facilitate a better understanding of the fundamental mechanisms leading to increased venous thromboembolic events in patients with MASH.

1857P Machine learning models (MLM) predict venous thromboembolism events (VTE) in Asian oncological inpatients better than the Khorana Score (KS)

1857P Machine learning models (MLM) predict venous thromboembolism events (VTE) in Asian oncological inpatients better than the Khorana Score (KS)

Multiple myeloma: retrospective assessment of routine thromboprophylaxis and utility of thrombotic risk scores

BackgroundThe high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in multiple myeloma (MM) warrants primary thromboprophylaxis for most patients. Myeloma-specific thrombotic risk scores (TRSs), such as IMPEDE-VTE, SAVED, and PRISM, were developed to improve risk assessment and guide antithrombotic strategies. Their performance is variable and has not yet been tested in Latin America. ObjectivesWe aimed to assess the use of primary thromboprophylaxis, the incidence of VTE and bleeding events, and the effectiveness of TRSs in patients with newly diagnosed MM. MethodsThis was a retrospective, single-center study. Cumulative VTE rates and TRS performance were analyzed using survival and receiver operating characteristic curves. ResultsThe study included 250 newly diagnosed MM patients; the vast majority (98.6%) received aspirin as thromboprophylaxis. VTE occurred in 8% within the initial 6 months, increasing to 14.8% over a median follow-up of 19 months. High rates of major bleeding (4.8%) and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (4.4%) events were documented. A minimal proportion (0.8%, 0.5%, and 1.2%) of patients were classified as low risk by IMPEDE-VTE, PRISM, and SAVED scores, respectively. Only IMPEDE-VTE exhibited a trend for distinguishing between intermediate-risk (7.14%) and high-risk (13.2%) groups (P = .09). PRISM and SAVED scores showed limited utility. VTE did not impact survival. ConclusionAspirin as primary thromboprophylaxis carries an unacceptable risk of VTE and bleeding in patients at intermediate or high thrombotic risk. The IMPEDE-VTE score performed best, although without reaching statistical significance. We confirm that VTE does not portend poor overall survival in MM.

A new simplified risk assessment model enhances postoperative prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in Chinese adult patients with inguinal hernia (CHAT-3): a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) significantly affects the prognosis of surgical patients with inguinal hernia. The complex Caprini score, commonly used for postoperative VTE risk assessment, poses practical challenges for surgeons in clinical settings. The CHAT-3 trial, a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial, compared a simple three-factor model to assess VTE risk against routine practices in postinguinal hernia surgery (IHS) patients. The patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to the intervention or control arm. The intervention group used the three-factor model to identify patients at moderate or high risk of VTE for subsequent prophylaxis according to clinical guidelines. Both groups were followed for 4 weeks, with randomization implemented using computer-generated sequences. The primary outcome measured was the rate of VTE prophylaxis. Secondary outcomes included time spent on VTE risk assessment (surgeon self-reported), postoperative D-dimer trends, perioperative VTE occurrence, bleeding events, and the net clinical benefit. Of the 1109 participants, 508 in the experimental group and 601 in the control group completed follow-up. The three-factor model showed higher VTE prophylaxis rates in all patients (pharmacologic prophylaxis: 26.2 vs. 6.00%, P <0.001) and particularly in those at high risk (pharmacologic prophylaxis: 57.3 vs. 9.50%, P <0.001). The experimental group significantly reduced VTE risk assessment time compared to the Caprini score (1.39±0.55min vs. 5.73±1.35min, P <0.001). The experimental group had lower D-dimer levels (0.26±0.73mg/l vs. 0.35±0.55mg/l, P =0.028). In the experimental group, the patients did not experience an increased risk of VTE (0 vs. 1.66%, P =0.268) and bleeding (1.18 vs. 0.67%, P =0.558) compared to the controls. There was no significant difference in net clinical benefit, which combined VTE and bleeding events, between the experimental and control groups (1.18 vs. 0.83%, P =0.559). Applying the simple three-factor model in perioperative VTE management could quickly identify the patient with a high risk of VTE and improve the prophylaxis rate of perioperative VTE.

Contemplating Screening for Protein S Deficiency: To Screen or Not?

Protein S (PS) deficiency is a thrombophilia disorder due to the reduced activity of protein S which regulates coagulation function leading to venous thromboembolism (VTE) event. It is an autosomal dominant disorder whereby it can be heterozygous or homozygous. A positive family history of protein S deficiency is a significant risk factor for developing thromboembolism. We report a case of an infant born to a mother with suspected protein S deficiency. The dilemma is whether we should screen this infant for protein S deficiency. His baseline coagulation profile was normal according to age and had no thrombotic event throughout his neonatal period.

Upadacitinib for Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review.

Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) remains a clinical challenge associated with considerable morbidity, including colectomy. Upadacitinib (UPA), a selective Janus kinase (JAK)-1 inhibitor, is approved for moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis in patients intolerant or not responding to tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors. It has also increasingly been used off-label for ASUC. We performed a systematic review of all available literature on UPA in ASUC. We identified 11 studies, with a pooled total of 55 patients. Most patients experienced rapid and sustained improvement. Colectomy rate at 90 days was 16.3%. Among those who did not get colectomy, 80% were in steroid-free remission at follow-up. The reported adverse events were low, including 2 venous thromboembolic events. Overall, UPA appears to represent a safe and effective therapy for ASUC.

Use of preoperative erythropoietin-stimulating agents is associated with decreased thrombotic adverse events compared to red blood cell transfusion in surgical patients with anaemia.

Preoperative red blood cell (RBC) transfusions increase post-operative venous thromboembolic (VTE) events. Erythropoietin-stimulating agents (ESAs) increase VTE risk in cancer patients; we aimed to assess ESA versus RBC-associated VTE risks in a broad population of surgical patients. We queried TriNetX Diamond Network from 2006 to 2023, comparing patients with anaemia within 3 months preoperatively who received preoperative ESAs with or without intravenous (IV) iron to patients who received preoperative RBCs. Sub-analyses included (1) all surgeries and (2) cardiovascular surgeries. We propensity score matched for demographics, comorbidities, medical services, post-treatment haemoglobin (g/dL) and, for all-surgery comparisons, surgery type. Outcomes included 30-day post-operative mortality, VTE, pulmonary embolism (PE), disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) and haemoglobin. In our 19,548-patient cohorts, compared with preoperative RBC transfusion, ESAs without IV iron were associated with lower mortality (relative risk [RR] = 0.51 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.45-0.59]), VTE (RR = 0.57 [0.50-0.65]) and PE (RR = 0.67 [0.54-0.84]). Post-operative haemoglobin was higher in the ESA without IV iron cohort compared with the transfusion cohort (10.0 ± 1.4 vs. 9.4 ± 1.8 g/dL, p = 0.002). Cardiac surgical patients receiving ESAs with or without IV iron had lower risk for post-operative mortality, VTE and PE (p < 0.001) than those receiving RBCs. Post-operative haemoglobin differed between patients receiving ESAs with IV iron versus RBCs (10.1 ± 1.5 vs. 9.4 ± 1.9 g/dL, p = 0.0009). Compared with surgical patients who were transfused RBCs, ESA recipients had reduced 30-day post-operative risk of mortality, VTE, PE and DIC and increased haemoglobin levels. IV iron given with ESAs improved mortality.

Prospective Cohort Study of a Treatment Strategy for a Combination of the Left Common Iliac Vein Compression Stenosis and Pelvic Venous Insufficiency.

To develop a strategy for the iliac vein stenting in patients with a combination of the left common iliac vein (LCIV) compression stenosis and pelvic venous insufficiency (PVI). This prospective comparative cohort study included 55 patients with hemodynamically significant LCIV stenosis out of 285 females with PVI screened in 2014-2022. All 55 patients underwent duplex ultrasound, multi-detector computed venography, ovarian venography, and multiplanar pelvic venography. Patients underwent LCIV stenting or the left gonadal vein (LGV) embolization as the primary intervention. The endpoints (chronic pelvic pain [CPP] relief, patency of stents, and reduction in pelvic venous reflux [PVR]) were evaluated 1 and 10 days, as well as 1, 6, and 12 months after the procedure. All patients received antithrombotic therapy after the interventions. The primary LCIV stenting was performed in 49 patients and resulted in the CPP relief in 69.4%, pain reduction from 7.9±1.3 to 1.7±1.1 visual analog scale (VAS) scores (p=0.005), and substantial reduction of PVR in LGV (from 4.3±0.6 seconds to 1.9±0.3 seconds, p=0.003). The LGV embolization as the second stage of treatment was performed in 30.6% of patients with the LGV reflux greater than 5 seconds as a possible cause for the CPP persistence. The primary LGV embolization failed in 100% of patients (no changes in CPP and PVR). The LCIV stenting at the second stage resulted in the CPP relief within 10 days and the pelvic venous reflux (PVR) reduction. There were no complications of stenting, and the patency of stents in the follow-up period was 100%. Postembolization syndrome occurred in 9.5% of patients. No thromboses of the veins of the pelvis and lower extremities were identified. Treatment of patients with a combination of LCIV compression and PVI involves staged endovascular interventions: the LCIV stenting should be considered the first-line treatment, while the LGV embolization is performed when the PVI symptoms persist for more than 6 months and is not acceptable as the first-line treatment. The developed strategy of endovascular treatment for the combination of left common iliac vein (LCIV) and pelvic venous insufficiency (PVI) provides an effective elimination of chronic pelvic pain (CPP) and reflux in the pelvic veins and avoids unnecessary embolizations of the gonadal veins, thereby eliminating possible risks related to complications of embolization. The use of antithrombotic therapy is an effective and safe approach for preventing venous thromboembolic events after endovascular interventions.

Postoperative Acute Intracranial Hemorrhage and Venous Thromboembolism in Patients with Brain Metastases Receiving Acetylsalicylic Acid Perioperatively.

Cranial operations are associated with a high risk of postoperative intracranial hemorrhage (pICH) and venous thromboembolic events, along with increased mortality and morbidity. With the use of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) for prophylaxis becoming more prevalent, the risk of bleeding when ASA is administered preoperatively is unknown, as are the effects of discontinuation upon the occurrence of thromboembolic events, especially in societies with aging demographics. To address these questions, a retrospective analysis was performed using medical records and radiological images of 1862 patients subjected to brain tumor surgery over a decade in our department. The risk of pICH was compared in patients with metastases receiving ASA treatment versus patients not receiving ASA treatment. The occurrence of venous thromboembolic events after surgery was also evaluated. The study group consisted of 365 patients with different types of brain metastases. In total, 20 patients suffered pICH and 7 of these were associated with clinical neurological deterioration postoperatively. Of the 58 patients who took ASA preoperatively, 2 patients experienced pICH, compared with 5 patients in the non-ASA impact group (p = 0.120). Patients who took ASA were not at significantly higher risk of pICH and therefore a worse outcome compared to the group without ASA. Therefore, these data suggest that in patients at high cardiovascular risk, ASA can be safely continued during elective brain tumor surgery.