Background: Lipoprotein (a), Lp(a), is associated with cardiovascular complications and atherothrombosis in arteries. However, the effects of Lp(a) in venous disease are unknown and uninvestigated. Hypothesis: Utilizing a patient population with iliofemoral stenosis from external compression (May-Thurner Syndrome) of which 30% had a prior deep vein thrombosis (DVT), we hypothesize that elevated Lp(a) levels may be associated with an increased risk of major reoperations after intravascular vein stenting (IVS) when compared to patients with non-elevated Lp(a) levels. Methods: In this study, 584 patients who underwent IVS for chronic iliofemoral stenosis between 2011 and 2019 were retrospectively studied. Patients with acute DVT, any prior IVS, or no Lp(a) results were excluded. Patients were stratified into two groups according to Lp(a) levels: non-elevated Lp(a) <50 mg/dL (N=472 patients), and elevated Lp(a) ≥50 mg/dL (N=112). Statistical analysis of demographics, clinical outcomes, and venous clinical severity score (VCSS) included paired t-tests and chi-squared tests. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard models assessed the relationship of Lp(a) with time to major reoperation requiring venography and/or intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). Results: Patients with elevated Lp(a) levels were more likely to be Black (14% vs. 2.3%; p <0.001), hypertensive (56% vs. 44%; p = 0.025), higher preop VCSS pain (2.0 vs. 1.6; P<0.01), and greater number of reoperations (2.1 vs. 1.7; p = 0.037), specifically major reoperations (54% vs. 21%; p = 0.012) than those with non-elevated Lp(a) levels. Both non-elevated and elevated Lp(a) demonstrated comparable changes in composite VCSS scores during post-op, 1, 2, and 3-year follow-up (p = 0.12, 0.3, 0.4, and 0.5, respectively). However, multivariate analysis, controlling for demographic variables and comorbidities, showed no significant association between elevated Lp(a) and major reoperation (HR: 1.3; 95% CI: 0.84-2.00; p = 0.2). A statistically significant interaction was found between Lp(a) and hypertension status (p = 0.003). Compared with the reference group (Lp(a)) <50 mg/dL and no hypertension), those with Lp(a) ≥50 mg/dL and hypertension demonstrated a statistically significant increase in risk for reoperation (p = 0.01). Conclusion: This study found that elevated Lp(a) levels were not associated with major reoperations in patients undergoing IVS for chronic iliofemoral stenosis. While Lp(a) levels have a significant impact in arterial disease, this study suggested that Lp(a) may have a lesser influence in venous disease. As such, the utility of Lp(a) as a predictive biomarker in venous disease may be limited.