Venous Air Trap Research Articles

CRRT circuit venous air chamber design and intra-chamber flow dynamics: a computational fluid dynamics study

BackgroundVenous air trap chamber designs vary considerably to suit specific continuous renal replacement therapy circuits, with key variables including inflow design and filter presence. Nevertheless, intrachamber flow irregularities do occur and can promote blood coagulation. Therefore, this study employed computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations to better understand how venous air trap chamber designs affect flow.MethodsThe flow within a venous air trap chamber was analyzed through numerical calculations based on CFD, utilizing large eddy simulation. The working fluid was a 33% glycerin solution, and the flow rate was set at 150 ml/min. A model of a venous air trap chamber with a volume of 15 ml served as the computational domain. Calculations were performed for four conditions: horizontal inflow with and without a filter, and vertical inflow with and without a filter. Streamline plots and velocity contour plots were generated to visualize the flow.ResultsIn the horizontal inflow chamber, irrespective of filter presence, ultimately the working fluid exhibited a downstream vortex flow along the chamber walls, dissipating as it progressed, and being faster near the walls than in the chamber center. In the presence of a filter, the working fluid flowed uniformly toward the outlet, while in the absence of a filter the flow became turbulent before reaching the outlet. These observations indicate a streamlining effect of the filter.In the vertical inflow chamber, irrespective of filter presence, the working fluid flowed vertically from the inlet into the main flow direction. Part of the working fluid bounced back at the chamber bottom, underwent upward and downward movements, and eventually flowed out through the outlet. Stagnation was observed at the top of the chamber. Without a filter, more working fluid bounced back from the bottom of the chamber.ConclusionsCFD analysis estimated that the flow in a venous air trap chamber is affected by inflow method and filter presence. The “horizontal inflow chamber with filter” was identified as the design creating a smooth and uninterrupted flow throughout the chamber.

Can a low prime volume arterial filter be used as an alternative for a venous bubble trap in minimal extracorporeal circulation? An in vitro investigation.

During cardiac surgery the use of a minimal extracorporeal circulation (MiECC) system may reduce the adverse effects for the patient. This is probably caused by reduced inflammation and hemodilution. For the use of a MiECC circuit, a venous bubble trap (VBT) is warranted for safety reasons. The aim of this study was to assess if an arterial filter with a small prime volume has the same (or better) air removal capacities as a VBT in a MiECC circuit and subsequentially may be used as an alternative. In an in vitro study, air removal properties were compared between the arterial filter and three VBT's on the market, VBT160 (Getinge), VBT 8 (LivaNova and VARD (Medtronic). In a MiECC circuit, the filter devices were placed in a venous position and challenged with massive and micro air. Gaseous microemboli (GME) were measured with a bubble counter proximal and distal of the VBT device. More than 99.9 % of the air was removed after a bolus air challenge by all VBT's. Both the VARD and the AF100 showed better GME removal properties (not significant for the AF100) compared to the other devices. All filters showed GME generation after a challenge with massive air. Compared to the other filters, only the VARD showed no passing of larger bubbles when a volume of 50mL of air was present in the filter. The AF100 seems to be a safe and low prime alternative for use in a MiECC system as a venous air trap. A word of caution, placement of the AF100 arterial filter in the venous line is off label use.

Differences in chamber structure contribute to the incidence of venous air trap chamber coagulation during AN69ST-CHF: clinical and in vitro evaluation

BackgroundDuring continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT) in patients with sepsis and critical conditions, circuit coagulation can occur, often for unclear reasons. In this study, we investigate how the structure of the venous air trap chamber may contribute to venous air trap chamber coagulation. Clinical data were evaluated and experiments were performed.MethodsThe clinical evaluation involved patients who underwent continuous hemofiltration (CHF) using an acrylonitrile-co-methallyl sulfonate surface-treated (AN69ST) hemofilter (AN69ST-CHF) and either an ACH-Σ or Prismaflex CKRT machine in our ICU from April to July 2019. The patient data were divided into two groups based on CKRT machine and the percentage of CHF procedures that could continuously be performed for 22 h (CHF target achievement rate), and coagulation sites were evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed by the Mann–Whitney U test and Pearson’s chi-square test. For in vitro experiments, a system was constructed to circulate a 33% glycerol solution at a flow rate of 150 ml/min. In a venous air trap chamber, fluid dye disappearance times and fluid movements were visually evaluated.ResultsThe clinical evaluation included 22 procedures (8 patients) in the ACH-Σ group and 22 procedures (11 patients) in the Prismaflex group, without significant differences in patient backgrounds between the groups. The CHF target achievement rate was 72.7% (16/22) in the ACH-Σ group and 77.3% (17/22) in the Prismaflex group, revealing no significant difference (p = 0.73). However, significantly fewer venous air trap chamber coagulations were observed in the Prismaflex group (1/5) than in the ACH-Σ group (5/6) (p < 0.01). In vitro evaluation found that the dye disappearance time was significantly shorter when using the Prismaflex device (17.5 s ± 0.7 s) than the ACH-Σ device (51.2 s ± 0.7 s; p < 0.05). Visual evaluation revealed that in the ACH-Σ venous air trap chamber the upper layer of the accumulated fluid was quite stagnant, whereas fluid flowed with uniform agitation through the Prismaflex venous air trap chamber. Hence, differences were observed in fluid flow and retention in the vein air trap chambers, depending on the chamber structure.ConclusionChamber structure may contribute to the occurrence of venous air trap chamber coagulation during CKRT.

Computational fluid dynamics analysis of venous air trap chamber geometry

Computational fluid dynamics analysis of venous air trap chamber geometry

Computational fluid dynamics analysis of venous air trap chamber geometry

Computational fluid dynamics analysis of venous air trap chamber geometry

Simulation of blood coagulation in venous air trap chamber by casein micelle formation

Simulation of blood coagulation in venous air trap chamber by casein micelle formation

Simulation of blood coagulation in venous air trap chamber by casein micelle formation

Simulation of blood coagulation in venous air trap chamber by casein micelle formation

Formation of Blood Foam in the Air Trap During Hemodialysis Due to Insufficient Automatic Priming of Dialyzers.

We were encouraged to investigate the reasons for large amounts of foam observed in bloodlines during hemodialysis (HD). Foam was visible in the venous air trap within the Artis Gambro dialysis device. Estimates of the extent of foam were graded (0-no foam, 10-extensive foam) by two persons that were blind to the type of dialyzer used. Thirty-seven patients were involved in the dialysis procedures. Consecutive dialyses were graded using dialyzers from Fresenius Medical Care (CorDiax dialyzers that were used for high flux HD-FX80 and FX100, and for hemodiafiltration-FX1000). The extracorporeal circuit was primed automatically by dialysate using Gambro Artis software 8.15 006 (Gambro, Dasco, Medolla Italy, Baxter, Chicago, IL, USA). The priming volume recommended by the manufacturer was 1100 mL, whereas our center uses 1500 mL. Extensive amounts of blood foam were visual in the air traps. Although the manufacturer recommended extension of priming volume up to 3000 mL, this did not eliminate the foam. Microbubble measurement during HD revealed the air to derive from the dialyzers. When changing to PF210H dialyzers (Baxter) and using a priming volume of 1500 mL, the foam was significantly less (P < 0.01). The extent of foam correlated with the size of the FX-dialyzer surface (P = 0.002). The auto-priming program was updated to version 8.21 by the manufacturer and the extent of foam in the air trap using FX dialyzers was now reduced and there was no longer a difference between FX and PF dialyzers, although less foam was still visible in the venous air trap during several dialyses. In conclusion, this study urgently calls attention to blood foam development in the venous air trap when using Artis devices and priming software 8.15 in combination with Fresenius dialyzers. Updated auto-priming software (version 8.21) of Artis should be requested to reduce the extent of foam for the Fresenius dialyzers. Other interactions may also be present. We recommend further studies to clarify these problems. Meanwhile caution is warranted for the combined use of dialysis devices and dialyzers with incompatible automatic priming.

Potential impact of oxygenators with venous air trap on air embolism in veno-arterial Extracorporeal Life Support.

Air embolism is a potentially fatal but underrecognized complication in Extracorporeal Life Support (ECLS). Oxygenators containing venous air traps have been developed to minimize the risk of air embolism in daily care. We reproduced air embolism as occurring via a central venous catheter in an experimental setting to test the potential of oxygenators with and without venous bubble trap (VBT) to withhold air. An in vitro ECLS circuit was created and a central venous catheter with a 3-way stopcock and a perforated male luer cap was inserted into the inflow line. Three different oxygenators with and without VBT and their capability to withhold air were examined. After 60 seconds of stable ECLS flow, the stopcock was opened towards the atmosphere for 3 minutes. Afterwards, air accumulation within the oxygenator was determined. Comparison of the total air entrapment showed a significant superiority of the oxygenators with VBT (p < 0.001). All oxygenators were able to partly withhold macro air boli, however, the capacity of oxygenators with VBT was higher. Passing through the oxygenator resulted in a reduction of microbubbles in all cases. Macro air emboli can be substantially reduced by usage of oxygenators that contain a VBT, whereas the capability to withhold microbubbles to a vast extent seems to depend on the intrinsic oxygenator's membrane.

Sources of Mortality on Dialysis with an Emphasis on Microemboli.

Patients on chronic hemodialysis have a shortened survival compared to the general population. There are multiple sources of morbidity and mortality unique to the dialysis population that account for this. Reasons include the effects of blood membrane interactions, intradialytic hypotension, myocardial stunning, excessive interdialytic weight gain, high-flow arteriovenous fistulae, and impaired lipid break down by anticoagulation administered during HD. Another risk factor, not well appreciated, is the occurrence of microemboli of air (microbubbles) during HD. Such microemboli are not effectively removed by the venous air trap and the safety system provides no warning when these small microbubbles enter the venous bloodline of the extra corporeal circuit and then the venous circulation of the patient. Data indicate that the gas emboli are not fully adsorbed and become embedded by fibrin resulting in a combined clot that causes microemboli in the lung. In addition, these microbubbles (of the size of blood corpuscles) can pass the pulmonary circulation into the left heart and then into the general arterial circulation explaining their detection not only in the lungs but also in the brain and heart of patients. Risk factors for such microbubble appearance include the high blood pump speed associated with high-efficiency dialyses. This review will discuss these various issues in relation to the better outcome of patients in Japan and also how to reduce some of these risk factors.

Pulsatility Produced by the Hemodialysis Roller Pump as Measured by Doppler Ultrasound.

Microbubbles have previously been detected in the hemodialysis extracorporeal circuit and can enter the blood vessel leading to potential complications. A potential source of these microbubbles is highly pulsatile flow resulting in cavitation. This study quantified the pulsatility produced by the roller pump throughout the extracorporeal circuit. A Sonosite S-series ultrasound probe (FUJIFILM Sonosite Inc., Tokyo, Japan) was used on a single patient during normal hemodialysis treatment. The Doppler waveform showed highly pulsatile flow throughout the circuit with the greatest pulse occurring after the pump itself. The velocity pulse after the pump ranged from 57.6 ± 1.74 cm/s to -72 ± 4.13 cm/s. Flow reversal occurred when contact between the forward roller and tubing ended. The amplitude of the pulse was reduced from 129.6 cm/s to 16.25 cm/s and 6.87 cm/s following the dialyzer and venous air trap. This resulted in almost nonpulsatile, continuous flow returning to the patient through the venous needle. These results indicate that the roller pump may be a source of microbubble formation from cavitation due to the highly pulsatile blood flow. The venous air trap was identified as the most effective mechanism in reducing the pulsatility. The inclusion of multiple rollers is also recommended to offer an effective solution in dampening the pulse produced by the pump.

A High Blood Level in the Air Trap Reduces Microemboli During Hemodialysis

Previous studies have demonstrated the presence of air microemboli in the dialysis circuit and in the venous circulation of the patients during hemodialysis. In vitro studies indicate that a high blood level in the venous air trap reduces the extent of microbubble formation. The purpose of this study was to examine whether air microbubbles can be detected in the patient's access and if so, whether the degree of microbubble formation can be altered by changing the blood level in the venous air trap. This was a randomized, double-blinded, interventional study of 20 chronic hemodialysis patients. The patients were assigned to hemodialysis with either an elevated or a low blood level in the air trap. The investigator and the patient were blinded to the settings. The numbers of microbubbles were measured at the site of the arteriovenous (AV) access for 2 min with the aid of an ultrasonic Doppler device. The blood level in the air trap was then altered to the opposite setting and a new measurement was carried out after an equilibration period of 30 min. Median (range) for the number of microbubbles measured with the high air trap level and the low air trap level in AV access was 2.5 (0-80) compared with 17.5 (0-77), respectively (P = 0.044). The degree of microbubble formation in hemodialysis patients with AV access was reduced significantly if the blood level in the air trap was kept high. The exposure of potentially harmful air microbubbles was thereby significantly reduced. This measure can be performed with no additional healthcare cost.

A Heparin-Coated Dialysis Filter (AN69 ST) Does Not Reduce Clotting during Hemodialysis when Compared to a Conventional Polysulfone Filter (F×8)

Background: We investigated whether the heparin-coated AN69 ST hemodialysis (HD) filter induced less hypercoagulability during HD than a conventional polysulfone filter (F×8). Methods: In a crossover design, 11 patients were treated alternately with AN69 ST and F×8 filters (45 sessions). All filters were primed with unfractionated heparin (UFH) and unadsorbed UFH was removed by saline flushing. Half the conventional dalteparin dose was given as a bolus dose at the start of HD. Clotting was evaluated hourly in the venous air trap. Prothrombin fragments 1 and 2 (PF1 + 2), antithrombin (AT), β-TG and anti-FXa activity were repeatedly measured. Results: One patient treated with enalapril had two repeated adverse reactions to the AN69 ST filter and was excluded from the study. Use of the AN69 ST filter did not decrease the mean clot score or PF1 + 2, but decreased β-TG compared to the F×8 filter. Conclusion: The heparin-coated AN69 ST filter did not induce less coagulation when compared to the F×8 filter.

Development of Air Micro Bubbles in the Venous Outlet Line: An In Vitro Analysis of Various Air Traps Used for Hemodialysis

Venous air traps were tested in vitro with respect to presence of micro bubbles. Three types of venous air traps were measured (Bioline, Bioline GmbH, Luckenwalde, Germany; Gambro, Gambro AB, Lund, Sweden; Fresenius M.C., Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA, Bad Homburg, Germany). Measurements (n = 10) were taken for each air trap, fluid flow (50-600 mL/min), and fluid level (high/low). A 1.5-MHz ultrasound probe was used with an analysis device. The probe was mounted on the outlet line downstream of the venous air trap. A semisynthetic fluid was used to resemble blood viscosity. Occurrences of micro bubbles, without inducing an alarm of the dialysis device, were detected in almost all measurements. The amount of bubbles increased with increasing flow. There were more bubbles with low fluid level compared with high level. The Bioline tubing released the least bubbles in high fluid level. At low level, the Gambro tubing showed the least bubbles at flows 50-400 mL/min, and the Fresenius M.C. tubing showed the least bubbles at flows 400-600 mL/min. High fluid level in the air trap reduced generation of micro bubbles compared to low level, as did lower fluid flow versus high flow. The design of the air trap was also of importance.

The Sensor in the Venous Chamber Does Not Prevent Passage of Air Bubbles During Hemodialysis

We previously showed, in vitro, that micro bubbles pass the air trap without inducing an alarm. The aim was to investigate if micro bubbles bypass the detector during hemodialysis (HD). During HD (40 patients, 47 HD sessions, 231 measurements), an ultrasound detector was fixed just after the venous air trap. Micro bubble size was measured in the range from 5 microm up to >42.5 microm. Blood flow was at a mean 346 mL/min (SD +/- 57). The mean of all micro bubbles per minute, without inducing an alarm, was at start 128 (range 0-769). Measurements revealed the presence of micro bubbles in all of the series and in 90% of the measurements. There was no difference between start and end of the same dialyses. There was a correlation between blood flow and extent of micro bubbles for the smaller sizes and the sum of all bubbles (r > or = 0.29, P < or = 0.026). Micro bubbles passed the air trap without alarming. Most bubbles were approximately 5 microm.

Air Bubbles Pass the Security System of the Dialysis Device Without Alarming

During hemodialysis microembolic findings have been noted after the venous chamber (subclavian vein). The aim of this study was to evaluate if air could pass the venous chamber and, if so, if it passes the safety-system detector for air-infusion without triggering an alarm. Various in vitro dialysis settings were performed using regular dialysis devices. A dextran fluid was used instead of blood to avoid the risk of development of emboli. Optical visualization as well as recirculation and collection of eventual air into an intermediate bag were investigated. In addition, a specifically designed ultrasound monitor was placed after the venous air trap to measure the presence of eventual microbubbles. Speed of dialysis fluid was changed, as was the level of the fluid in the air trap. Thereby a fluid level was considered "high" if it was close to the top of the air trap and "low" if it was around the mid part of the air trap. By optical vision microbubbles were seen at the bottom of the air trap and could pass the air trap towards the venous line without alarming. During recirculation several mL of air were collected in an intermediate bag after the venous line. Ultrasound monitoring exhibited the presence of microbubbles of the size of approximately 5 microm upwards passing to the venous line in all runs performed. Amount of bubbles differed between devices and in general an increased fluid speed correlated significantly with the increased counts of microbubbles/min. No alarming of the detector occurred. A more concentrated fluid allowed higher counts/min when flow was increased to 600 mL/min. Data revealed that air passes the safety-sensor in the air trap without alarming. The presence of air increased in general with fluid speed and a lower fluid level in the air trap. Differences were present between devices. If this affects the patients has to be elucidated.

The effect of oral anticoagulation on clotting during hemodialysis

Between 5% and 10% of hemodialysis patients are treated with oral anticoagulants. It is currently unknown whether additional anticoagulation with heparin or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) is needed to prevent clotting during hemodialysis. In this prospective, randomized, cross-over study 10 patients treated with oral anticoagulants (phenprocoumon) received either no additional anticoagulation or low dose dalteparin (bolus of 40 IU/kg body weight) before dialysis. Efficacy of hemodialysis was measured by normalized weekly Kt/V and urea reduction rate (URR). Thrombus formation was evaluated by measurement of D-dimer and inspection of air traps and dialyser. The median international normalized ratio (INR) did not differ between both observation periods (phenprocoumon 2.2(2 to 3) vs. dalteparin 2.1(2 to 2.9). The anti-Xa level in dalteparin patients was 0.33 (0.27 to 0.38) IU/mL after 2 hours and 0.16 (0.03 to 0.23) IU/mL after 4 hours of hemodialysis. The median increase of D-dimer was significantly higher in patients without additional dalteparin therapy during hemodialysis (DeltaD-dimer 0.23 microg/mL vs. 0.03 mug/mL) (P= 0.0004). Complete thrombosis of the dialyser membrane occurred in one patient in the phenprocoumon group but in none with combined treatment. The extent of thrombosis in the arterial and venous air trap and dialyser was significantly less in patients with additional dalteparin therapy (P= 0.0014, P= 0.0002, and P= 0.0005, respectively). Weekly Kt/V and URR was similar in both groups. Standard oral anticoagulation with an INR between 2 and 3 is insufficient to prevent clotting during hemodialysis. Additional low dose anticoagulation with a LMWH or heparin is necessary to facilitate treatment.

Risk Factors of System Clotting in Heparin-Free Haemodialysis

Heparin-free haemodialysis must be considered for all dialysis patients with a risk of haemorrhage. This technique is associated with increased danger of system coagulation with a blood loss of up to 250 ml. In 84 patients with a risk of haemorrhage, 296 heparin-free haemodialyses were recorded prospectively. First signs of coagulation were found very much more frequently in the venous airtrap than in the dialyser (146 vs 42). System coagulation occurred in 13 of the 296 dialyses (4%) and was prevented by prophylactic switching of the system and dialyser in 140 dialyses (47%). The time of system coagulation was on average 1.8 hours (+/- 0.2) after the beginning of dialysis. The 13 patients with system coagulation had a reduced blood flow on dialysis (217 +/- 52 vs 240 +/- 36 ml/min). Their initially normal clotting time (12 +/- 5 vs 14 +/- 4 min) was more significantly shortened after 2 h (4 +/- 3 vs 8 +/- 3 min). The activities of antithrombin III (87 +/- 34% vs 88 +/- 39%) and protein C (66 +/- 45% vs 59 +/- 37%) do not differ from those of 47 other patients, even at the time of system coagulation, as measured in five patients (92 +/- 34% for antithrombin III, 51 +/- 29% for protein C). System coagulation and shortening of clotting time thus cannot be regarded as a consequence of absorption of these inhibitory factors of plasmatic coagulation. The danger of system coagulation in heparin-free haemodialysis could probably be further reduced by an improvement of the biocompatibility of systems (airtrap) and dialysers (less activation of thrombocytes).