Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Research Articles

Impact of Left Ventricular Unloading on Outcome of Heart Transplant Bridging With Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support in New Allocation Policy.

The new heart allocation policy places veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO)-supported heart transplant (HT) candidates at the highest priority status. Despite increasing evidence supporting left ventricular (LV) unloading during VA-ECMO, the effect of LV unloading on transplant outcomes following bridging to HT with VA-ECMO remains unknown. From October 18, 2018 to March 21, 2023, 624 patients on VA-ECMO at the time of HT were identified in the United Network for Organ Sharing database and were divided into 2 groups: VA-ECMO alone (N=384) versus VA-ECMO with LV unloading (N=240). Subanalysis was performed in the LV unloading group: Impella (N=106) versus intra-aortic balloon pump (N=134). Recipient age was younger in the VA-ECMO alone group (48 versus 53 years, P=0.018), as was donor age (VA-ECMO alone, 29 years versus LV unloading, 32 years, P=0.041). One-year survival was comparable between groups (VA-ECMO alone, 88.0±1.8% versus LV unloading, 90.4±2.1%; P=0.92). Multivariable Cox hazard model showed LV unloading was not associated with posttransplant mortality after HT (hazard ratio, 0.92; P=0.70). Different LV unloading methods had similar 1-year survival (intra-aortic balloon pump, 89.2±3.0% versus Impella, 92.4±2.8%; P=0.65). Posttransplant survival was comparable between different Impella versions (Impella 2.5, versus Impella CP, versus Impella 5.0, versus Impella 5.5). Under the current allocation policy, LV unloading did not impact waitlist outcome and posttransplant survival in patients bridged to HT with VA-ECMO, nor did mode of LV unloading. This highlights the importance of a tailored approach in HT candidates on VA-ECMO, where routine LV unloading may not be universally necessary.

Transarterial embolization to treat a massive hemothorax during mechanical circulatory support via puncturing of the extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuit

BackgroundCurrent guidelines recommend the use of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) for patients with cardiogenic shock that is refractory to medical therapy. Bleeding is the most common complication of MCS. Transarterial embolization (TAE) is often performed to treat this complication, because it is a less invasive hemostatic procedure. However, the TAE option needs to be carefully considered during MCS, as the access route may be limited during MCS.Case presentationA man in his 70 s was diagnosed with acute myocardial infarction and underwent percutaneous coronary intervention via venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) and Impella. During treatment in the intensive care unit, he suffered damage to a branch of the internal thoracic artery during a cardiac drainage procedure, which was subsequently treated via emergency TAE.An ECMO return cannula and an Impella sheath were inserted into the patient’s right and left femoral arteries, respectively. An approach from the left brachial artery was selected, and the left internal thoracic artery was embolized. Subsequently, the patient required re-intervention to treat re-bleeding from another artery. Because it was difficult to target the target artery from the brachial one, owing to interference from the Impella catheter, the ECMO circuit near the return cannula was punctured and a guiding sheath was inserted. The ECMO flow and the patient’s blood pressure decreased following placement of this guiding sheath. We were thus able to maintain the patient’s blood pressure by increasing the infusion fluids and Impella flow, and embolize the target artery using a gelatin sponge to achieve hemostasis.ConclusionWhen TAE is difficult to perform during MCS using an approach from the upper extremities, a lower extremity approach with a sheath inserted into the ECMO circuit may represent a viable alternative.

Role of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in pediatric myocarditis

ABSTRACT Fulminant myocarditis in children is rare, but it has the potential for high morbidity and mortality. In this report, we review articles demonstrating the role of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) in the fulminant myocarditis, and describe the clinical course of a healthy 11-year-old girl who rapidly deteriorated into cardiogenic shock. The patient was weaned from mechanical ventilation on day 7 and she was discharged from the ICU on day 12. VA-ECMO is considered as a life-saving therapy in patients with hemodynamic instability prior to recovery or other escalation therapy.

Tailoring the Best Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Through Invasive Right Ventricular Pressure-Volume Loops in a Patient Supported by Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

Patients undergoing veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) typically suffer from cardiogenic pulmonary edema and lung atelectasis, which can exacerbate right ventricular (RV) dysfunction through an increase in lung elastance and RV afterload. Invasive mechanical ventilation settings, and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in particular, can help to improve RV performance by optimizing lung recruitment and minimizing alveolar overdistention. In this report, we present a VA-ECMO supported patient in whom in vivo RV pressure-volume (PV) loops were measured during a decremental PEEP trial, leading to the identification of an optimum PEEP level from a cardio-respiratory viewpoint. This innovative approach of tailoring mechanical ventilation settings according to cardio-respiratory physiology through in vivo RV PV loops may provide a novel way to optimize hemodynamics and patient outcomes.

Residual ischaemia in acute myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock supported by venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: does complete revascularization hold the key?

Residual ischaemia in acute myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock supported by venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: does complete revascularization hold the key?

Amniotic fluid embolism rescued using venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation without initial anticoagulation: A case report and literature review.

Amniotic fluid embolism (AFE) is a fatal obstetric condition that often rapidly leads to severe respiratory and circulatory failure. It is complicated by obstetric disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) with bleeding tendency; therefore, the introduction of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is challenging. We report the case of a patient with AFE requiring massive blood transfusion, rescued using VA-ECMO without initial anticoagulation. A 39-year-old pregnant patient was admitted with a complaint of abdominal pain. An emergency cesarean section was performed because a sudden decrease in fetal heart rate was detected in addition to DIC with hyperfibrinolysis. Intra- and post-operatively, the patient had a bleeding tendency and required massive blood transfusions. After surgery, the patient developed lethal respiratory and circulatory failure, and VA-ECMO was introduced. Based on the course of the illness and imaging findings, the patient was diagnosed with AFE. By controlling the bleeding tendency with a massive transfusion and tranexamic acid administration, using an antithrombotic ECMO circuit, and delaying the initiation of anticoagulation and anti-DIC medication until the bleeding tendency settled, the patient was managed safely on ECMO without complications. By day 5, both respiration and circulation were stable, and the patient was weaned off VA-ECMO. Mechanical ventilation was discontinued on day 6. Finally, she was discharged home without sequelae. VA-ECMO may be effective to save the lives of patients who have AFE with lethal circulatory and respiratory failure. For safe management without bleeding complications, it is important to start VA-ECMO without initial anticoagulants and to administer anticoagulants and anti-DIC drugs after the bleeding tendency has resolved.

Differential Hypoxia Risk in Cardiopulmonary Arrest Patients Undergoing Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation and IMPELLA Support.

Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is a therapeutic strategy for managing cardiogenic shock. However, it carries the risk of cardiogenic pulmonary edema, potentially leading to differential hypoxia. Although IMPELLA can mitigate pulmonary congestion, the combination of VA-ECMO and IMPELLA has frequently resulted in differential hypoxia, requiring a transition from VA-ECMO to veno-arteriovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VAV-ECMO). Therefore, this study aimed to examine the influence of IMPELLA on the incidence of differential hypoxia, necessitating a shift to VAV-ECMO. This single-center, retrospective, observational study included patients who experienced cardiopulmonary arrest and received treatment with VA-ECMO combined with an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) or IMPELLA between 2017 and 2022. The primary endpoint assessed the incidence of differential hypoxia, necessitating a switch to VAV-ECMO. Patients with cardiopulmonary arrest received treatment with VA-ECMO in combination with IABP (N = 28) or IMPELLA (N = 29). There was a significant increase in differential hypoxia 96 hours post-VA-ECMO initiation in the IMPELLA group, necessitating a transition to VAV-ECMO. The combination of VA-ECMO and IMPELLA in patients experiencing cardiopulmonary arrest may significantly increase the risk of differential hypoxia. A multidisciplinary approach employing mechanical circulatory support is crucial, with ongoing consideration of the potential risks associated with differential hypoxia.

Brain injury plasma biomarkers in patients on veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: A pilot prospective observational study.

Early diagnosis of acute brain injury (ABI) is critical for patients on veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO) to guide anticoagulation strategy; however, neurological assessment in ECMO is often limited by patient sedation. In this pilot study of adults from June 2018 to May 2019, plasma samples of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), neurofilament light chain (NFL), and tubulin associated unit (Tau) were collected daily after V-A ECMO cannulation and measured using a multiplex platform. Primary outcomes were occurrence of ABI, assessed clinically, and neurologic outcome, assessed by modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Of 20 consented patients (median age = 48.5°years; 55% female), 8 (40%) had ABI and 15 (75%) had unfavorable neurologic outcome at discharge. 10 (50%) patients were centrally cannulated. Median duration on ECMO was 4.5°days (IQR: 2.5-9.5). Peak GFAP, NFL, and Tau levels were higher in patients with ABI vs. without (AUC = 0.77; 0.85; 0.57, respectively) and in patients with unfavorable vs. favorable neurologic outcomes (AUC = 0.64; 0.59; 0.73, respectively). GFAP elevated first, NFL elevated to the highest degree, and Tau showed limited change regardless of ABI. Further studies are warranted to determine how plasma biomarkers may facilitate early detection of ABIs in V-A ECMO to assist timely clinical decision-making.

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Rescue Therapy in Pediatric Bupropion Cardiotoxicity

Abstract Objective Our objective was to describe clinical characteristics and course of pediatric bupropion ingestions requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) life support. Desgin The study included a retrospective cohort of patients ≤18 years of age reported to a regional poison control (PC) system covering three states in the upper Midwest United States. All bupropion exposures ≤18 years of age, coded as receiving ECMO to treat toxicity, were included. Clinical presentation and management including ECMO are presented as descriptive statistics. Results During the study period, 4,951 bupropion exposures were reported; 1,145 (23.1%) were children. Nine patients were coded as undergoing ECMO; four (44.4%) were ≤18 years of age (median 16, range 14–17). All were treated with venoarterial ECMO. The median time from ingestion to presentation was 2.25 hours (range: 1–3.5). Median first systolic blood pressure and pulse were 100 mm Hg (range: 70–124) and 119.5 (range: 70–175). The median time from ingestion to ECMO was 17.63 hours (range: 7.25–33.75); median number of vasopressors was 2.5 (range: 2–3). All experienced multiple seizures, ventricular dysrhythmias, and hypotension. Three of four sustained cardiac arrest. All but one required transfer to an ECMO-capable facility for definitive care. Three patients survived with full neurologic recovery; one died. Conclusion Pediatric bupropion cases requiring ECMO were rare in this study. Time to initiation and duration of EMCO suggest that the variable onset of hemodynamic instability may delay ECMO initiation. It is incumbent on PCs and medical toxicologists to educate prescribers and pediatricians about bupropion's potential lethality and to consider early transfer to an ECMO center.

VENTRICULAR ARRHYTHMIAS IN A UNEXPECTED CARDIAC MAGNETIC RESONANCE

Abstract Background Electrical storm in a widespread inflammation of the myocardium represent a very challenge condition and recognizes a broad spectrum of etiology. Case Presentation A 59–year–old man, without significant prior medical history, came to our attention because, following an emergent hernioplasty procedure, he displayed anterior ST–segment elevation and elevated troponin levels (150.000 ng/L). An echocardiogram revealed an estimated left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) of 39% with anterior hypokinesia. Coronary angiography showed no abnormalities. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated ring–like edema and ring–like late gadolinium enhancement in the left ventricle on T2–weighted and PSIR sequences, with no involvement of the right ventricle. Additionally, there was an increase in extracellular volume. Despite several laboratory tests to investigate infectious or autoimmune causes, the etiology remained inconclusive. To further explore the cause, an endomyocardial biopsy was performed. However, the patient experienced an unstable electrical storm three days later. Management Recurrent ventricular tachycardia (VT) was initially treated with esmolol, amiodarone, and procainamide, but with limited success. Due to VT–induced hemodynamic instability, the patient was sedated with propofol and intubated. Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) confirmed lymphocytic myocarditis. In light of the hemodynamic instability and refractory electrical storm, the patient was promptly cannulated for veno–arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA–ECMO) and started on methylprednisolone. Although there was an apparent resolution of VT, the patient experienced new episodes, necessitating percutaneous stellate ganglion block and an upgraded treatment plan that included mycophenolate mofetil. Given the high burden of arrhythmias, severe ventricular dysfunction, and the lack of response to medications, the patient is now awaiting cardiac transplantation. Conclusion Transmural edema and ring–like late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) in the early phase are predictors of a poor prognosis. In cases of hemodynamic deterioration and refractory electrical storms, it is crucial to promptly initiate mechanical support. Cardiac transplantation remains the sole treatment option for individuals who do not respond to antiarrhythmic and immunosuppressive drugs.

Organ donation after extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a nationwide retrospective cohort study

BackgroundLimited data are available on organ donation practices and recipient outcomes, particularly when comparing donors who experienced cardiac arrest and received extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) followed by veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) decannulation, versus those who experienced cardiac arrest without receiving ECPR. This study aims to explore organ donation practices and outcomes post-ECPR to enhance our understanding of the donation potential after cardiac arrest.MethodsWe conducted a nationwide retrospective cohort study using data from the Japan Organ Transplant Network database, covering all deceased organ donors between July 17, 2010, and August 31, 2022. We included donors who experienced at least one episode of cardiac arrest. During the study period, patients undergoing ECMO treatment were not eligible for a legal diagnosis of brain death. We compared the timeframes associated with each donor’s management and the long-term graft outcomes of recipients between ECPR and non-ECPR groups.ResultsAmong 370 brain death donors with an episode of cardiac arrest, 26 (7.0%) received ECPR and 344 (93.0%) did not; the majority were due to out-of-hospital cardiac arrests. The median duration of veno-arterial ECMO support after ECPR was 3 days. Patients in the ECPR group had significantly longer intervals from admission to organ procurement compared to those not receiving ECPR (13 vs. 9 days, P = 0.005). Lung graft survival rates were significantly lower in the ECPR group (log-rank test P = 0.009), with no significant differences in other organ graft survival rates. Of 160 circulatory death donors with an episode of cardiac arrest, 27 (16.9%) received ECPR and 133 (83.1%) did not. Time intervals from admission to organ procurement following circulatory death and graft survival showed no significant differences between ECPR and non-ECPR groups. The number of organs donated was similar between the ECPR and non-ECPR groups, regardless of brain or circulatory death.ConclusionsThis nationwide study reveals that lung graft survival was lower in recipients from ECPR-treated donors, highlighting the need for targeted research and protocol adjustments in post-ECPR organ donation.

Mechanisms maintaining right ventricular contractility-to-pulmonary arterial elastance ratio in VA ECMO: a retrospective animal data analysis of RV–PA coupling

BackgroundTo optimize right ventricular–pulmonary coupling during veno-arterial (VA) ECMO weaning, inotropes, vasopressors and/or vasodilators are used to change right ventricular (RV) function (contractility) and pulmonary artery (PA) elastance (afterload). RV–PA coupling is the ratio between right ventricular contractility and pulmonary vascular elastance and as such, is a measure of optimized crosstalk between ventricle and vasculature. Little is known about the physiology of RV–PA coupling during VA ECMO. This study describes adaptive mechanisms for maintaining RV–PA coupling resulting from changing pre- and afterload conditions in VA ECMO.MethodsIn 13 pigs, extracorporeal flow was reduced from 4 to 1 L/min at baseline and increased afterload (pulmonary embolism and hypoxic vasoconstriction). Pressure and flow signals estimated right ventricular end-systolic elastance and pulmonary arterial elastance. Linear mixed-effect models estimated the association between conditions and elastance.ResultsAt no extracorporeal flow, end-systolic elastance increased from 0.83 [0.66 to 1.00] mmHg/mL at baseline by 0.44 [0.29 to 0.59] mmHg/mL with pulmonary embolism and by 1.36 [1.21 to 1.51] mmHg/mL with hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction (p < 0.001). Pulmonary arterial elastance increased from 0.39 [0.30 to 0.49] mmHg/mL at baseline by 0.36 [0.27 to 0.44] mmHg/mL with pulmonary embolism and by 0.75 [0.67 to 0.84] mmHg/mL with hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction (p < 0.001). Coupling remained unchanged (2.1 [1.8 to 2.3] mmHg/mL at baseline; − 0.1 [− 0.3 to 0.1] mmHg/mL increase with pulmonary embolism; − 0.2 [− 0.4 to 0.0] mmHg/mL with hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction, p > 0.05). Extracorporeal flow did not change coupling (0.0 [− 0.0 to 0.1] per change of 1 L/min, p > 0.05). End-diastolic volume increased with decreasing extracorporeal flow (7.2 [6.6 to 7.8] ml change per 1 L/min, p < 0.001).ConclusionsThe right ventricle dilates with increased preload and increases its contractility in response to afterload changes to maintain ventricular–arterial coupling during VA extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Venoarterial ECMO in cardiogenic shock: a decade-long single-center analysis

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements None. Introduction Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VA-ECMO) has emerged as a salvage intervention in refractory cardiogenic shock, offering both circulatory and respiratory support as a bridge to recovery, a bridge to transplant, or a bridge to decision. Purpose This study aimed to assess the demographics, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of VA-ECMO patients with cardiogenic shock in a tertiary center. Methods We conducted a retrospective observational study, encompassing patients admitted with cardiogenic shock and treated with VA-ECMO up to October 2023, marking the milestone of the 100th VA-ECMO patient in our unit. Key patient data, including demographics, clinical presentation, ECMO-related complications, and outcomes, were extracted from medical records. Summary statistics were employed for data analysis. Results From 2012 to October 2023, our hospital treated 100 patients in VA-ECMO. The mean age was 58.4 ± 11.9 years, with a male predominance (60%). Approximately 50% of patients were admitted from the emergency room after sudden cardiac arrest. Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) accounted for 39% of cardiogenic shock cases, followed by complicated post-valvular replacement surgery (13%), myocarditis (10%), and acute decompensated heart failure (9%). The median hospital stay was 12.5 days (range: 0 to 114), with a median of 4.0 days on ECMO (range: 0 to 52). All VA-ECMO reported in this cohort were percutaneous, with 39% requiring left ventricular unloading. In 11% cases VA-ECMO served as a bridge to transplant. When it comes to VA-ECMO-related complications, hematological complications, including anemia and thrombocytopenia necessitating transfusion, were observed in 53% of patients, and thromboembolic complications, such as acute limb ischemia, affected 28% of patients. Bleeding complications were notable, with 12% experiencing significant access bleeding, 16% gastrointestinal bleeding, 9% airway bleeding, and 2% intracerebral hemorrhage. Additionally, 39% necessitated renal replacement therapy due to acute kidney failure. The 5-day survival rate stood at 69% (95% CI, 0.61-0.79), declining to 36% at 30 days (95% CI, 0.27-0.48) (see Figure 1). Of the 100 patients, 41 died while on VA-ECMO, with 36 either discharged or undergoing transplantation. Conclusions Our single-center experience illustrates VA-ECMO's predominant use in younger patients following ACS or cardiothoracic surgery. Despite associated complications, particularly thromboembolic events and severe bleeding, our observed mortality rate is slightly lower than reported for refractory cardiogenic shock. New research has emerged from global VA-ECMO registries, as well as clinical trials, however real-world data is lacking. This analysis provides a foundational understanding of cohort characteristics and sets the stage for future comparative studies.Table 1.Patient CharacteristicsFigure 1.Surviving Curve

Unloading the left ventricle in VA-ECMO: a comparative analysis of outcomes

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements None. Introduction Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VA-ECMO) has radically changed the way we see and treat cardiogenic shock, despite the challenges it presents. The retrograde delivery of oxygenated blood to the aorta via the arterial cannula imposes increased afterload on an already strained left ventricle (LV). Unloading techniques aim to reduce the preload and afterload caused by VA-ECMO on the LV. Purpose Our study aims to compare the clinical outcomes of patients on VA-ECMO where additional invasive techniques were employed to unload the LV, against those without unloading strategies. Methods Patients treated with VA-ECMO in our hospital since 2012 were categorized into two groups: the Venting Group (VG) that received LV unloading interventions and the Non-Venting Group (NVG) without such interventions. We collected comprehensive clinical data, including demographics, baseline characteristics, ECMO-related parameters, in-hospital complications, and patient outcomes. Statistical analyses involved chi-square tests for categorical variables and independent samples t-tests for continuous variables to assess the impact of unloading strategies on patient outcomes. Results Our hospital treated 100 patients with VA-ECMO (mean age 58.4 ± 11.9 years, 60% male). Approximately 39% of patients received LV unloading support. The choice of unloading device was guided by our center's expertise. Most commonly, Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump (IABP) was used (61.5%), followed by Impella CP (23.1%), percutaneous atrial septostomy (2.6%) and surgical LV venting (12.8%). Unloading techniques were implemented either concurrently with VA-ECMO cannulation (58.9%), before (17.9%), or after its insertion (23.2%). Most patients (68%) received inotropic drugs, predominantly dobutamine. The mean duration of venting device use was 4.2 ± 3.8 days. Airway bleeding (3.3% NVG vs. 17.9% VG, p=0.032) and thromboembolic complications (19.7% NVG vs. 41.0% VG, p=0.036) were significantly more prevalent in the VG. There were no significant differences in the others reported ECMO-related complications. No significant differences were observed in the mean duration of support with VA-ECMO (3 days NVG vs. 4 days VG, p=0.147) or in the mean duration of hospitalization (13 days NVG vs. 12 VG, p=0.619) between the two groups. The 30-day survival rates were 42% (95% CI, 0.30-0.59) in NVG and 29% (95% CI, 0.18-0.49) in VG, which did not display statistical significance, p=0.24 [Figure 1]. Conclusions In our cohort, incorporating unloading devices alongside VA-ECMO did not yield major differences in survival rates, yet led to a considerable increase in airway bleeding and thromboembolic complications. The precocity of unloading device implantation occurred either as an initial strategy or to prevent increased afterload in hearts with limited contractile reserve.Characteristics and Clinical OutcomesSurviving Curves VG vs. NVG

VA-ECMO weaning strategy using adjusted pulse pressure by vasoactive inotropic score in AMI complicated by cardiogenic shock.

This study evaluated how well serial pulse pressure (PP) and PP adjusted by the vasoactive inotropic score (VIS) predicted venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) weaning success and clinical outcomes in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS) patients. A total of 213 patients with AMI-CS who received VA-ECMO between January 2010 and August 2021 were enrolled in the institutional ECMO registry. Serial PP and VIS were measured immediately, 12, 24, and 48h after VA-ECMO insertion. PP adjusted by VIS was defined as PP/√VIS. The primary outcome was successful VA-ECMO weaning. Successful weaning from VA-ECMO was observed in 151 patients (70.9%). Immediately after VA-ECMO insertion, PP [successful vs. failed weaning, 26.0 (15.5-46.0) vs. 21.0 (12.5-33.0), P=0.386] and PP/√VIS [11.1 (5.1-25.0) vs. 6.0 (3.1-14.2), P=0.118] did not differ between the successful and failed weaning groups. Serial PP and PP adjusted by VIS at 12, 24, and 48h after VA-ECMO insertion were significantly higher in patients with successful weaning than those with failed weaning [successful vs. failed weaning, 24.0 (4.0-38.0) vs. 12.5 (6.0-25.5), P=0.007 for 12h PP, and 10.1 (5.7-22.0) vs. 2.9 (1.7-5.9), P<0.001 for 12h PP/√VIS]. The 12h PP/√VIS showed better discriminative function for successful weaning than 12h PP alone [area under the curve (AUC) 0.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72-0.88, P<0.001 vs. AUC 0.67, 95% CI 0.57-0.77, P=0.002]. Patients with a low 12h PP/√VIS (≤7) had higher rates of in-hospital mortality (44.4% vs. 19.8%, P<0.001) and 6month follow-up mortality (hazard ratio 2.41, 95% CI 1.49-3.90, P<0.001) than those with a high 12h PP/√VIS (>7). PP adjusted by VIS taken 12h following VA-ECMO initiation can predict weaning from VA-ECMO more successfully than PP alone, and its low value was associated with a higher risk of mortality in AMI-CS patients.

Impella vs Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in cardiogenic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis of propensity score matched studies

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): Abiomed Singapore PTE. Ltd. Background/Introduction Cardiogenic shock is a life-threatening condition associated with multi-organ failure and death. Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is well-established in the management of cardiogenic shock; however, mortality rates have remained relatively consistent over the past two decades. Impella is a transluminal microaxial ventricular assist device that improves haemodynamics by unloading the left ventricle and represents an alternative to VA-ECMO. No randomised controlled trials exist to date comparing Impella versus VA-ECMO given difficulties in recruiting patients due to the acute nature of the condition. Whilst a plethora of non-randomised, comparative studies have been published, many are confounded by underlying differences in baseline disease characteristics. Propensity score matched / adjusted studies may mitigate confounding by accounting for differences in important covariates that impact outcomes. Purpose The objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of propensity score matched / adjusted studies to assess the clinical outcomes of Impella versus VA-ECMO in cardiogenic shock patients. Methods A systematic review was undertaken to identify all comparative studies of Impella and VA-ECMO in cardiogenic shock which performed propensity score matching / adjustment of outcomes to account for important covariates. The study limitations were assessed using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations) approach. In-hospital/30-day survival and bleedings requiring transfusion were meta-analysed using the random effects method. Results Six propensity score matched / adjusted studies comparing Impella versus VA-ECMO in cardiogenic shock were included in the meta-analysis. A statistically significant difference in in-hospital/30-day mortality was detected between patients treated with Impella (39.6%) versus VA-ECMO (53.8%) (odds ratio [OR] 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.57 [0.44, 0.74]; p&amp;lt;0.0001). Similarly, Impella (19.9%) was associated with statistically significantly fewer bleeding events requiring transfusion compared with VA-ECMO (28.8%) (OR=0.61 [0.46, 0.80]; p=0.0004). Conclusion(s) This systematic review identified no randomised controlled trials of Impella versus VA-ECMO. The meta-analysis of propensity matched observational trials, represents the highest level of evidence available to date, and suggests that Impella may be associated with increased survival rates and decreased bleeding. Randomised controlled trials are urgently needed to assess cardiac support modalities in cardiogenic shock.

SCAI SHOCK stage classification: valid for all indications and devices in patients with short-term mechanical circulatory support?

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements None. Background The Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention (SCAI) SHOCK stage has demonstrated prognostic value in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS), including patients on venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) support. It has also been validated in different scenarios as acute coronary syndrome -ACS- or out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Purpose Our objective was to study the prognostic value of SCAI SHOCK stage in different indications and etiologies requiring different types of short-term mechanical circulatory support (MCS). Methods Retrospective analysis of consecutive patients supported with VA-ECMO or Impella CP® in a referral center. We studied the SCAI SHOCK stage at MCS implantation according different devices, indication and etiology, and its relationship with in-hospital and follow-up survival. Results 263 patients were included between 2014-March 2023 (Table). The SCAI SHOCK stage was less advanced in complex high risk percutaneous coronary intervention (CHIP-PCI) indication and more advanced in postcardiotomy shock, myocarditis, pulmonary embolism (PE), refractory cardiac arrest or electric storm (Figure A). In-hospital survival was 41.1% and it was significantly lower as SCAI SHOCK stage increased (A 83.9%, B 100%, C 66.7%, D 39.2%, E 24.5%; p=0.000), as well as in follow-up for a median time of 24.5 [47] months (figure B). This association was maintained with both types of devices separately: VA-ECMO (A 80%, B 100%, C 33.3%, D 38.9%, E 24.5%, p=0.001) and Impella (A 84%, B 100%, C 75%, D 42.9%, E 25%, p=0.005). Regarding the indication and etiology for MCS, SCAI SHOCK classification was significantly related with survival in CS indication, as well as in ACS and heart failure (HF) etiology (Figure B). However, no relationship between SCAI and survival was observed in indications as CHIP-PCI (A 83.9%, B 100%, C 50%; p=0.386), electrical storm (C 0%, D 100%, E 70%; p=0.075) and postcardiotomy shock (D 35.6%, E 20%; p=0.470), neither in etiologies as PE (D 0%, E 28.6%; p=1), infective endocarditis (D 28.6%, E 0%; p=1), myocarditis (D 100%, E 0%; p=0.250),and other causes of cardiac arrest (D 0%, E 25%; p=1), nor in patients admitted for elective cardiac surgery. Conclusions SCAI SHOCK stage classification showed prognostic value in patients with short-term MCS indicated by diverse etiologies, including both VA-ECMO and Impella CP devices. The prognostic value was maintained for the indication of CS, and in ACS and HF etiologies, but not in electrical storm, CHIP-PCI, PE, myocarditis or postcardiotomy shock. Studies are needed to validate this classification in other settings.TableFigure

Predicting survival with scales for in-hospital extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements None. Background Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is a rescue option in cardiac arrest (CA) refractory to advanced life support. Patient selection is challenging, and anecdotal scores are specific to this situation. Purpose Our objective was to analyse the usefulness of different scales used in shock and venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenator (VA-ECMO) support in in-hospital ECPR. Methods Retrospective analysis of consecutive ECPR cases in a referal center. The ECPR alert includes in-hospital cardiologist/intensivist, on-call interventional cardiologist/cardiac surgeon for cannulation, and on-call perfusionist. We analysed hospital survival based on our own and other literature-based mortality scales calculated prior to VA-ECMO implantation: SCAI, INTERMACS, CardShock, CSS, SAVE-ECMO, RESCUE-IHCA. Results Out of 222 VA-ECMO implanted, we included 66 ECPR cases between 2014-oct 2023. Baseline, admission and ECPR characteristics are collected in the table. Overall in-hospital survival was 16.7% (n=11) (cerebral performance cathegory 1-2). We developed a sumative mortality scale including factors related to survival in our population and the literature (lactate &amp;gt;10.05, &amp;gt;60 minutes CA, peripheral arterial disease (PAD), and on-call time for ECPR alert activation) (figure A). This scale was significantly related to survival to discharge (figure A). Regarding the scales and their association with survival, only RESCUE-IHCA showed a trend towards statistical significance (16 [15] points in survivors vs 19 [15] in died patients, p=0.096). The remaining scores showed no relationship with survival to discharge: SAVE-ECMO -15,73±4.8 in survivors vs -14,07±4.1 in died patients (p= 0.301), CSS 10,09±1.9 vs 10.40±2.7 (p=0.651), CardShock 4.82±1.3 vs 5.27±1.2 (p=0.287). INTERMACS (all patients 1) and SCAI classification (all patients stage E) are not valid for discriminating survival in this situation. We compared the scales using the ROC curve for hospital survival, and we found that our own scale had the best discriminatory ability (Figure B). Conclusions Scales developed for shock or VA-ECMO support were not significantly related to survival in patients undergoing in-hospital ECPR. The specific ECPR scale RESCUE-IHCA, and our own scale developed in this population showed better discriminatory ability in survival to discharge.Table.Baseline, admission and ECPRFigure.A: Own scale. B: ROC curves

Comparison between acute and chronic refractory cardiogenic shock: is prognosis different?

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements None. Background Short-term mechanical circulatory support (ST-MCS) is essential to reverse refractory cardiogenic shock (RCS). Since compensatory mechanisms are differently activated depending on whether the cause of CS is acute injury or decompensation of advanced chronic heart failure, hypothetically, the prognosis could also be different. Purposes The aim of our study was to compare the prognosis of patients with RCS supported with ST-MCS (venoarterial-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO), Centrimag, Impella CP and Impella 5.0) according to whether the cause of cardiogenic shock was an acute myocardial injury (acute myocardial infarction, myocarditis...) or a worsening of advanced cardiomyopathy. Methods Consecutive patients ≥ 18 years with RCS requiring ST-MCS at a tertiary center from January 2020 to August 2023 were prospectively included. They were stratified according to whether the cause of shock was acute or chronic. Demographic, clinical characteristics before insertion, and outcomes were included in the analysis. Results A total of 86 patients with RCS were supported with ST-MCS in that period, 55 of them (64%) for acute injury and the rest (n=31; 36%) as decompensation of chronic heart failure, with a significantly higher Charlson Comorbidity Index in the chronic group (2(0-3) vs 3(2-4); p=0.01). Acute shock was predominantly supported with VA-ECMO (49.1%) and Impella CP (41.8%), while Impella 5.0 was the most commonly used device in chronic patients (32.2%). The severity of CS was significantly higher in the acute shock group, assessed by SCAI (p=0.005), VIS Score (55.1 (26.19-90.5) vs 8 (3.1-30); p=0.005) and lactate level (5.3 (3-10.3) vs 1.2 (1-2.2) mmol/l; p&amp;lt;0.005) and a higher but non-significant SOFA score (8 (6-10) vs 6 (4-9); p=0,06). However, no differences were found in prognosis, both in-hospital mortality, mortality during support and 30-day and 1-year mortality (Figure 1). Most patients with chronic shock were referred to cardiac transplantation (54.8%) while most patients with acute shock were weaned by myocardial recovery(30.9%), but there were no differences in the final destination of these patients (p=0.089). There were no differences in systemic and local complications between the three groups, except for the rate of device-related ischemia (21.8% vs. 6.4%, p=0.015). Conclusions In our center, most patients in CS who required short-term mechanical circulatory support debut after an acute cardiac injury. Percutaneous ST-MCS is preferentially selected in the acute group, probably because of its easy accessibility in emergency situations. Although patients with acute CS present a more severe overall situation than patients worsening due to advanced heart failure, there were no differences in the short- and long-term prognosis or in the destination treatment of these patients.Table of resultsFigure 1.Mortality in RCS

Pulmonary artery catheter and veno-arterial ECMO training for cardiology fellows: evaluation of a simulation-based program

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements None. Introduction Proficiency in pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) use and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) therapy is crucial for delivering high-quality critical care and improving patient outcomes in cardiac intensive care units (CICUs). Both procedures are conducive to immersive simulation training. Our study focuses on evaluating the efficacy of a simulation-based training program in these specific domains for cardiology fellows. Methods Cardiology fellows participated in two blended learning courses: one on PAC and one on veno-arterial ECMO. The PAC course consisted of a pre-course test of 12 multiple-choice questions assessing knowledge of indications, contraindications, and interpretation of PAC, a 45-minute didactic lecture, followed by a case-based, hands-on simulation training session for 60 minutes. The ECMO course consisted of a pre-course test of 15 multiple-choice questions assessing indications, contraindications, ECMO physiology, and circuit management, a 30-minute didactic lecture, followed by a case-based, hands-on simulation training session. Fellows completed a multiple-choice post-course test within 72 hours post-simulation training. All test questions were designed by experts in cardiac critical care. Results A total of 18 cardiology fellows completed the PAC simulation and 16 completed the ECMO simulation. For the PAC group the average score on the pre-exam was 60%, while on the post exam, the average score increased significantly to 86%, representing a 26% increase (p=0.04). For the ECMO training, the average score on the pre-exam was 67%, and on the post exam, the average score increased substantially to 90% in the ECMO exam, there was a 23% increase in the average post-exam score compared to the pre exam was recorded (p=0.05). Conclusion Simulation-based training in PAC and ECMO has a highly positive impact on the knowledge acquisition of cardiology fellows, with statistically significant increases in average post-exam scores in both areas. These findings not only validate the value of immersive simulation-based training programs but also underscore the need for further investigation into the implementation of educational initiatives aimed at enhancing care in cardiogenic shock.