VEMP Responses Research Articles

Diagnostic value of vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in benign paroxysmal positional vertigo

ObjectivesVestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs) are useful for studying the disturbances along nerve pathways implicated in the transmission of neurological information from otolithic organs related to vestibular function. This study aims to determine the differences in VEMPs in patients affected with benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV). MethodsWe recruited 36 patients, 9 diagnosed with recurrent BPPV (rBPPV), 9 with only one episode of vertigo (iBPPV), and 18 as a control group. We performed cervical and ocular VEMPs (cVEMPs and oVEMPs). ResultsWe observed differences in asymmetry ratio, which was 41.82% in cVEMPs in iBPPV and 68.27% in oVEMPs in rBPPV, while no asymmetry was found in control cases. Also, there was a lack of both VEMP responses in 22.2% of cases and an absence of cVEMP in 11.1% in iBPPV; in rBPPV, 11.1 % presented no responses in cVEMPs or oVEMPs, 22.2% showed no oVEMP, and 11.1% showed no cVEMP. These values were normal in the control group. ConclusionThe value of VEMPs in BPPV demonstrates the implication of vestibular damage, mainly utricle damage. For better sensitivity in detecting otolith abnormalities, we should perform oVEMPs and cVEMPs in recurrent BPPV and early stages of BPPV.

Diagnostic value of vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in benign paroxysmal positional vertigo

ObjectivesVestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs) are useful for studying the disturbances along nerve pathways implicated in the transmission of neurological information from otolithic organs related to vestibular function. This study aims to determine the differences in VEMPs in patients affected with benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV). MethodsWe recruited 36 patients, 9 diagnosed with recurrent BPPV (rBPPV), 9 with only one episode of vertigo (iBPPV), and 18 as a control group. We performed cervical and ocular VEMPs (cVEMPs and oVEMPs). ResultsWe observed differences in asymmetry ratio, which was 41.82% in cVEMPs in iBPPV and 68.27% in oVEMPs in rBPPV, while no asymmetry was found in control cases. Also, there was a lack of both VEMP responses in 22.2% of cases and an absence of cVEMP in 11.1% in iBPPV; in rBPPV, 11.1 % presented no responses in cVEMPs or oVEMPs, 22.2% showed no oVEMP, and 11.1% showed no cVEMP. These values were normal in the control group. ConclusionThe value of VEMPs in BPPV demonstrates the implication of vestibular damage, mainly utricle damage. For better sensitivity in detecting otolith abnormalities, we should perform oVEMPs and cVEMPs in recurrent BPPV and early stages of BPPV.

Vestibular Testing-New Physiological Results for the Optimization of Clinical VEMP Stimuli.

Both auditory and vestibular primary afferent neurons can be activated by sound and vibration. This review relates the differences between them to the different receptor/synaptic mechanisms of the two systems, as shown by indicators of peripheral function-cochlear and vestibular compound action potentials (cCAPs and vCAPs)-to click stimulation as recorded in animal studies. Sound- and vibration-sensitive type 1 receptors at the striola of the utricular macula are enveloped by the unique calyx afferent ending, which has three modes of synaptic transmission. Glutamate is the transmitter for both cochlear and vestibular primary afferents; however, blocking glutamate transmission has very little effect on vCAPs but greatly reduces cCAPs. We suggest that the ultrafast non-quantal synaptic mechanism called resistive coupling is the cause of the short latency vestibular afferent responses and related results-failure of transmitter blockade, masking, and temporal precision. This "ultrafast" non-quantal transmission is effectively electrical coupling that is dependent on the membrane potentials of the calyx and the type 1 receptor. The major clinical implication is that decreasing stimulus rise time increases vCAP response, corresponding to the increased VEMP response in human subjects. Short rise times are optimal in human clinical VEMP testing, whereas long rise times are mandatory for audiometric threshold testing.

Evaluation of vestibular evoked myogenic potential values in elder patients with hip fractures: A prospective controlled study

Background/Aim: Hip fractures among the elderly are a major public health problem that cause high rates of morbidity and mortality. There are many studies regarding prevention and defining the underlying causes of hip fractures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP) test responses of elderly patients without vestibular symptoms hospitalized due to fall-related hip fractures in order to evaluate the subclinical vestibular dysfunction rates in patients with hip fractures. Methods: Twenty-two patients aged 67-79 hospitalized due to fall-related hip fractures and 24 control patients presenting to the orthopedic clinic due to knee pain were included in the study. The participants underwent detailed otological examination and cVEMP tests. The two groups’ cVEMP records were then compared. Results: The demographic characteristics of the participants in the patient and control groups including age, gender, and race were similar. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups’ absent VEMP response rates. No significant difference in terms of P1 and N1 latencies was determined between the right and left ears in either group. The hip fracture group (study group) had significantly increased P1 and N1 latencies in cVEMP which is associated with central vestibular dysfunction. (P=0.008 and P=0.007, respectively). Conclusion: The rate of subclinical peripheral vestibular dysfunction, which can be identified by cVEMP evaluation, is increased in elderly patients with hip fractures caused by low energy trauma. Precautions like vestibular rehabilitation can be a preventive measure for hip fractures in the elderly.

New model of superior semicircular canal dehiscence with reversible diagnostic findings characteristic of patients with the disorder.

Third window syndrome is a vestibular-cochlear disorder in humans in which a third mobile window of the otic capsule creates changes to the flow of sound pressure energy through the perilymph/endolymph. The nature and location of this third mobile window can occur at many different sites (or multiple sites); however, the most common third mobile window is superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SSCD). There are two essential objective diagnostic characteristics needed to validate a model of SSCD: the creation of a pseudoconductive hearing loss and cVEMP increased amplitude and decreased threshold. Adult Mongolian gerbils (n = 36) received surgical fenestration of the superior semicircular canal of the left inner ear. ABR and c+VEMP testing were carried out prior to surgery and over acute (small 1 mm SSCD, 1-10 days) or prolonged (large 2 mm SSCD, 28 days) recovery. Because recovery of function occurred quickly, condenser brightfield stereomicroscopic examination of the dehiscence site was carried out for the small SSCD animals post-hoc and compared to both ABRs and c+VEMPs. Micro-CT analysis was also completed with representative samples of control, day 3 and 10 post-SSCD animals. The SSCD created a significant worsening of hearing thresholds of the left ear; especially in the lower frequency domain (1-4 kHz). Left (EXP)/right (CTL) ear comparisons via ABR show significant worsening thresholds at the same frequency representations, which is a proxy for the human pseudoconductive hearing loss seen in SSCD. For the c+VEMP measurements, increased amplitude of the sound-induced response (N1 2.5 ms and P1 3.2 ms) was observed in animals that received larger fenestrations. As the bone regrew, the c+VEMP and ABR responses returned toward preoperative values. For small SSCD animals, micro-CT data show that progressive osteoneogenesis results in resurfacing of the SSCD without bony obliteration. The large (2 mm) SSCD used in our gerbil model results in similar electrophysiologic findings observed in patients with SSCD. The changes observed also reverse and return to baseline as the SSCD heals by bone resurfacing (with the lumen intact). Hence, this model does not require a second surgical procedure to plug the SSCD.

A study on incidence of vestibular deficits in children with sensory neural hearing loss by using cervical Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials (cVEMP)

This study was conducted from an Audiology & rehabilitation clinic in Kerala- India from January 2022 to August 2022.In both evolutionary and embryonic perspective, the organs responsible for hearing and balance (auditory & vestibular system) have a common origin and developmental pattern. Sensory neural hearing loss (SNHL) is a common congenital sensory deficit occurring in large number of children and it is extensively investigated and has well defined management protocols such as hearing aids or cochlear implants and speech-language rehabilitation. But in comparison with the case of SNHL, very little effort has been done to investigate and treat the vestibular deficits which can co-occur along with SNHL. This study is an attempt to throw some light about the incidence of vestibular deficits in hearing impaired children. It was found that abnormal/absent VEMP responses were found in 57% of children with SNHL. VEMP responses were completely absent in 65% of ears with severe to profound hearing loss. Vestibular dysfunction was also present in 19% of children with moderate to moderately severe hearing loss. Incidence of vestibular deficits increases in higher degree of hearing loss such as severe to profound category. Motor delay was also reported in 10 out of 26 participants in this study which could be attributed to lack of visual motor development in children with vestibular deficits. However a large number of vestibular deficits in children with SNHL still remain under reported and uninvestigated which points to the need for conducting vestibular assessment in children diagnosed with SNHL.

Bone conducted vibration is an effective stimulus for otolith testing in cochlear implant patients.

BACKGROUND:Treatment with a cochlear implant (CI) poses the risk of inducing a behaviorally unmeasurable air-bone gap leading to false negative absence of cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMPs, oVEMPs) to air conducted sound (ACS).OBJECTIVE:To investigate VEMP response rates to ACS and bone conducted vibration (BCV) in CI patients and the applicability of the B81 transducer for BCV stimulation.METHODS:Prospective experimental study including unilateral CI patients, measuring cVEMPs and oVEMPs to ACS and to BCV, comparing response rates, signed asymmetry ratios, latencies, and amplitudes.RESULTS:Data of 13 CI patients (mean age 44±12 years) were analyzed. For the CI side, oVEMP and cVEMP response rates were significantly higher for BCV (77%cVEMP, 62%oVEMP) compared to ACS (23%cVEMP, 8%oVEMP). For the contralateral side, no difference between response rates to ACS (85%cVEMP, 69%oVEMP) and BCV (85%cVEMP, 77%oVEMP) was observed. Substantially higher asymmetries were observed for ACS (–88±23%for cVEMPs, –96±11%for oVEMPs) compared to BCV (–12±45%for cVEMPs, 4±74%for oVEMPs).CONCLUSIONS:BCV is an effective stimulus for VEMP testing in CI patients. The B81 is a feasible stimulator.

Assessment of the Clinical Use of Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials and the Video Head Impulse Test in the Diagnosis of Early-Stage Parkinson's Disease.

To explore the usefulness of vestibular tests including "vestibular evoked myogenic potentials" (VEMPs) and the video head impulse test (vHIT) in the early diagnosis of "idiopathic Parkinson's disease" (PD). The study involved 80 participants including 40 patients (24 males, 16 females; age average 63.20 ± 7.94 years) with PD and 40 healthy individuals (18 males and 22 females; age average of 60.36 ± 7.68 years). The Modified Hoehn and Yahr (H&Y) scale was used to measure how Parkinson's symptoms progress and the level of disability. Patients with PD underwent cVEMPs, oVEMPs, and vHIT and the results were compared with those of 40 age-matched healthy control (HC) subjects. vHIT results and VEMP responses were registered in all patients and HCs. One-sided absent cVEMP responses were found in 6 (15%) patients with PD and 8 (20%) patients had bilaterally absent responses. Five (12.5%) patients had 1-sided absent oVEMP responses and it was bilateral in 6 (15%). Patients with PD had significantly shorter cVEMP P1, N1 latency, lower cVEMP amplitudes, and oVEMP amplitudes than the HC group. The cVEMP and oVEMP amplitude asymmetry ratio was significantly higher in the PD group (P < .05). Evaluation of vHIT results and vestibular-ocular reflex (VOR) gain between the groups revealed that anterior canal and posterior canal VOR gains results were remarkably lower in the PD group than in the HCs (P < .05). There was no difference in right and left lateral canal VOR gains between the groups (P > .05). The results of this study suggest that cVEMP and vHIT can be used to evaluate the vestibular system in patients with early-stage Parkinson's disease.

Normative and Pathological Ranges of Cervical Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials in Normal Subjects and Patients with Complete Compensated Unilateral Vestibular Loss: A Cross Sectional Study.

To know the normative ranges of VEMP response metrics in healthy young adults. To know the pathological cutoff of VEMP metrics in unilateral vestibular loss patients. To compare our VEMP metrics with the normative values of other studies from the western world. Prospective cross-sectional study. Tertiary care audiovestibular laboratory. 30 healthy subjects and 15 cases with a unilateral complete compensated loss. Various VEMP parameters-p1 latency, n1 latency, p1-n1 amplitude and Interaural asymmetry ratio (IAR) were entered into databases and analyzed. We compared our parameters with the most cited scientific data on VEMP available in the PubMed database, and we analyzed the results. 90% of controls and 80% of cases got VEMP responses at 95dB HL threshold, 500Hz with subject/patient placed in sitting upright with head turned to opposite side position. The normative data of VEMP response metrics in young adults for p1, n1 latencies, p1-n1 amplitude, and IAR are 13 ± 2ms, 21 ± 2ms, 91 ± 33 uV, and 9.25 ± 7.3, respectively. As the VEMP test has 100% sensitivity and 100% (95% CI 87-100%) negative predictive value in detecting the saccular dysfunction, we recommend the VEMP test as a mandatory tool in the vestibular test battery. There is no statistically significant difference in various VEMP parameters between the control and normal sides of the case group.

Vestibular‐Evoked Myogenic Potential Outcomes Associated with Pediatric Sports‐Related Concussion

To 1) characterize vestibular-evoked myogenic potential responses in children and young adults with sports-related concussion (SRC) histories as compared with a normal healthy control group, and 2) correlate VEMP characteristics to SRC/sport history outcomes. Prospective cohort study. Seventy-six children and young adults with and without a history of SRC received cervical and ocular VEMP testing using a 500 Hz tone burst air conduction stimuli. VEMP response parameters (response rates, peak latencies, and peak-to-peak amplitudes) were assessed. Other clinical vestibular measures were performed. In the SRC group, sport history outcomes including number of SRC sustained over a lifetime, years of playing contact sports, and length of time playing contact sports were collected via in-person questionnaire. Children and young adults with SRC had significantly reduced oVEMP responses and peak-to-peak amplitudes and greater amplitude response asymmetries between left and right ear. There was no effect of group on cVEMP findings. A greater frequency of SRCs sustained throughout a lifetime, a greater number of contact sports played, and a longer duration of playing a contact sport correlated with significantly poorer VEMP response characteristics. Our results suggest that SRC and repeated subclinical head impact events have an effect on oVEMP outcomes. SRC may affect the utricle, superior vestibular nerve, and/or brainstem-mediated vestibular-ocular-reflex pathway. The prevalence of post-concussion-related dizziness is becoming increasingly common in a pediatric-otology clinic, thus performing VEMP testing in youth post-SRC provides an objective, noninvasive, and cost-effective method for monitoring the effects of sports-related impact on the vestibular system and related neural pathways. 3 Laryngoscope, 132:436-442, 2022.

Comparison of cervical and ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potential responses between tone burst versus chirp stimulation.

To compare the effectiveness of chirp and tone burst stimuli in oVEMP and cVEMP testing for healthy adults METHODS: This study was conducted in 56 healthy volunteers (112 ears). Ocular and cervical VEMP (oVEMP, cVEMP) tests were performed for each participant using tone burst and chirp stimuli. VEMP response rates, latency of each peak (p1-n1, n1-p1), peak to peak amplitude (p1-n1 amplitude and n1-p1 amplitude), and rectified amplitudes were measured and compared between these two different stimuli. VEMP response rates with chirp stimuli are higher than the tone burst stimuli for both cVEMP and oVEMP tests (The difference was statistically significant for oVEMP, p = 0.001). Chirp stimuli have higher p1n1 amplitude and rectified amplitude and shorter p1and n1 latency then tone burst stimuli for cVEMP (p = 0.015, p = 0.007, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, respectively). Chirp stimuli also have higher n1p1 amplitude and shorter n1and p1 latency then tone burst stimuli for oVEMP (p = 0.006, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, respectively). The present findings show that the chirp stimulus triggers earlier VEMP responses with higher amplitudes than the tone burst stimulus during cVEMP and oVEMP testing. VEMP response rate with chirp stimulus is also higher than the tone burst. Therefore chirp stimulus can be used in VEMP testing as effectively as, if not more than, tone burst stimulus in clinical practice.

Normal values for cervical and ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials using EMG scaling: effect of body position and electrode montage

Background The clinical utility of cervical and ocular vestibular-evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP and oVEMP) is limited by variability of testing protocols and a dearth of normative data using contemporary methods for amplitude scaling. Aims/objectives To investigate the effect of body position and electrode montage on VEMP responses and to establish normative values. Material and Methods This is a repeated measures study of 44 healthy young adult subjects (22 men and 22 women). Results The highest response rate (99%) for cVEMP was achieved in the supine position with the head elevated and turned. For oVEMP, the highest response rate (90%) was achieved using nasal alar electrode montage with the subject in a sitting position. Scaled peak-to-peak amplitude was higher in males than in females for both cVEMP and oVEMP. Conclusion Normative data for 44 young healthy adults was successfully collected for two body positions for cVEMP and two head positions and two electrode montages for oVEMP. Significance Our findings describe VEMP protocols that efficiently detect VEMP responses, and we provide normative VEMP response data for young healthy subjects. We describe a potential difference in response between males and females, which may be clinically important.

Outcome of otolith organ function after treatment of sudden sensorineural hearing loss

Objective:This study aimed to assess the clinical practice value of ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential（oVEMP） and cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential（cVEMP） in monitoring the rehabilitation of vestibular function in patients with suddensen sorineural hearing loss（SSHL）. Method:Twenty-four patients with SSHL were retrospectively enrolled， showing no VEMP response on the affected side but exhibiting VEMP responses after therapies We analyzed the improvement and the restoration of hearing and the parameters of VEMP response. Result:After treatment, seven patients showed VEMP recovery, including three cases with both oVEMP and cVEMP recovery, three cases with oVEMP recovery, and one case with cVEMP recovery. Between VEMP recoved group and VEMP unrecoved group, before treatment, no significant difference was found in the thresholds of pure-tone audiometry（PTA）. However, after treatment, VEMP recoved group exhibited lower PTA thresholds and better PTA shift （P<0.01）. Multivariate analysis revealed that recovery of VEMP was the independent risk factor for the therapeutic effect of SSHL. Conclusion:The Combination of oVEMP and cVEMP is an objective tool for assessing vestibular otolithic end organ function during dynamic functional recovery in SSHL and the recovery of VEMP could predict the auditory improvement.

Static and dynamic otolith reflex function in people with Parkinson's disease.

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder with possible vestibular system dysfunction. This study reports the transient and sustained functions of the otoliths and their reflex pathways in PD compared to healthy controls (HC) and determines if otolith function relates to previous fall history. Forty participants with PD and 40 HC had their otolith function assessed. Transient saccular and utricular-mediated reflexes were assessed by cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMPs and oVEMPs, respectively) elicited by air-conducted stimulus (clicks) and bone-conducted vibration (light tendon hammer taps). Static otolith function was assessed by the Curator Subjective Visual Vertical (SVV) test. Compared to HC, the PD group had significantly more absent cVEMP responses to both clicks (47.5% vs. 30%, respectively, p = 0.03) and taps (21.8% vs. 5%, respectively, p = 0.002). Only the PD group had bilaterally absent tap cVEMPs, this was related to previous falls history (p < 0. 001). In both groups, click oVEMPs were predominantly absent, and tap oVEMPs were predominantly present. The PD group had smaller tap oVEMP amplitudes (p = 0.03) and recorded more abnormal SVV responses (p = 0.01) and greater error on SVV compared to HC, p < 0.001. SVV had no relationship with VEMP responses (p = 0.14). PD impacts on cVEMP reflex pathways but not tap oVEMP reflex pathways. Bone-conducted otolith stimuli (taps) are more robust than air-conducted sound stimuli (clicks) for both o and cVEMPs. A lack of association between SVV and VEMP responses suggest that static and dynamic otolith functions are differentially affected in PD.

Optimization of Cervical and Ocular Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential Testing Using an Impulse Hammer in Adults, Adolescents, and Children.

To characterize cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential (c- and oVEMP) responses using an impulse hammer (IH) in adults and pediatrics at standardized force levels and evaluate: the relationship of force level on VEMP amplitude, sternocleidomastoid (SCM) contraction on cVEMP amplitude, required number of tap stimuli, and subject comfort. Using these data, optimal testing parameters were selected. Prospective study. Tertiary referral center. Seventy-eight healthy adults, adolescents, and children with no hearing or vestibular deficits. All subjects received c- and oVEMP testing using IH and 500 Hz tone burst air conduction stimuli. Adults received hard, medium, and soft force levels. Adolescents and children received medium and soft force levels. A comfort questionnaire was administered pre- and post-testing. IH VEMP response parameters (response rates, latency, cVEMP pre-stimulus SCM Electromyography [EMG], and peak-to-peak amplitude) were assessed per force level. Subjective reporting for patient comfort was also assessed. VEMP response rates ranged from 92 to 100%. Force had a linear relationship with VEMP amplitude. SCM contraction had a linear relationship with raw cVEMP amplitude; however, dissipated with amplitude normalization. Force level did not impact the number of taps needed. A minimum peak force of 15 to 20 N, accounting for SCM contraction, and using a lower EMG monitoring limit for cVEMP is recommended to elicit reliable responses. Overall, IH VEMP is appropriate and comfortable to use in adults and pediatrics and can be useful when an air conduction stimulus is contraindicated or not preferred.

Vestibular dysfunction in patients with auditory neuropathy detected by vestibular evoked myogenic potentials

ObjectivesThis study aimed to determine vestibular involvement in patients with auditory neuropathy (AN) using ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential (oVEMP), cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP), caloric tests, video Head Impulse Tests (vHIT), and Suppression Head Impulse Paradigm (SHIMP) tests. MethodsTwenty-two patients with AN (study group) and 50 age-and-gender-matched healthy subjects (control group) were enrolled. All patients underwent air-conducted sound oVEMP and cVEMP tests. In the study group, 20 patients underwent a caloric test, 10 patients underwent a video Head Impulse Test (vHIT), and nine patients underwent the Suppression Head Impulse Paradigm (SHIMP) test. ResultsSignificant differences in VEMP abnormalities were found between the two groups. Most AN patients showed no VEMP response, while only a few patients showed VEMP responses with normal parameters. Some AN patients presented abnormal VEMP parameters, including thresholds, latencies, and amplitudes. The abnormal rate (including no response and abnormal parameters) was 91% in the cVEMP test and 86% in the oVEMP test. No significant difference was found between oVEMP and cVEMP abnormalities. AN patients exhibited a 70% abnormal rate in the caloric test. Most AN patients showed normal VOR gains. Most patients showed no overt corrective saccades in vHIT, and exhibited normal anticompensatory saccades in the SHIMP test. ConclusionMany AN patients experience vestibular dysfunction, which may be detected by using a vestibular functional test battery. SignificanceVEMP abnormalities might reflect the status and degree of vestibular involvement in AN.

Vestibular and radiological evaluation of hearing impaired children with delayed Motor development

Background: Combined hearing and vestibular loss in children pose potentially significant problems. Children and infants with vestibular problems are faced with motor problems that could limit their normal development.Objectives: the aim of the study is to assess the relationship between the vestibular disorders and the delayed motor development in hearing impaired children as well as to assess the integrity of the vestibular system through clinical testing and radiological imaging in those children with delayed motor development.Methods: Thirty hearing impaired children with history of delayed motor milestones, and a control group of 10 hearing impaired children with normal motor development were included with variable degree of hearing loss. Each child was subjected to careful history taking, general examination, otoscopic examination, motor and balance questionnaires were answered by the parents or caregivers, audiological evaluation either through conditioned play audiometry or conventional audiometry, speech audiometry and Immittancemetry. Vestibular evaluation through cVEMP and caloric tests and finally the radiological studies through CT and MRI of the petrous bone.Results: There were variable degrees of hearing loss among both groups. In the control group (10 HI children, 20 ears), 18 ears (90%) had VEMP response, while two ears (10%) had absent VEMP, while in the study group (30 HI children, 60 ears), 48 ears (80%) had VEMP response, while 12 ears (20%) had absent VEMP. All children in the control group had normal caloric response, while in the study group, 23 children (77%) had normal response, and seven children (23%) had abnormal caloric response, 4 children had bilateral weakness and 3 had unilateral weakness. CT and MRI study of petrous bone was done for the control group and revealed normal radiology, while in the study group, 21 children had normal imaging (70%) and the last 9 children (30%) had abnormal findings, the most common abnormalities was enlarged vestibular aqueduct (13%), followed by common cavity (7%).Conclusion: Children with hearing loss, irrespective of the degree of hearing loss, the vestibular system should be screened, assessed as it may be responsible for co-morbidities in fine and gross motor difficulties. Early intervention and effective therapy will be the proper way to get good outcome.

Recovery of ocular and cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials after treatment of inner ear diseases

Purpose: This study aimed to assess the clinical value of ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential (oVEMP) and cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP) for monitoring the rehabilitation of vestibular function in patients treated for peripheral vertigo.Materials and methods: Fifteen patients who had been diagnosed with peripheral vertigo and showed no VEMP response on the affected side but exhibited symptom alleviation and VEMP responses after therapies were retrospectively enrolled. We analyzed the restoration and parameters of their VEMP response.Results: After treatment, six patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss showed VEMP recovery, including two with both oVEMP and cVEMP recovery, three with oVEMP recovery only, and one with cVEMP recovery only. Two patients with Meniere’s disease (MD) showed cVEMP recovery, while the other three MD patients showed oVEMP recovery. Three patients with herpes zoster oticus exhibited cVEMP recovery. One patient with vestibular neuritis exhibited cVEMP recovery. Among the patients with cVEMP and/or oVEMP restoration, most patients presented normal VEMP parameters; however, some patients showed abnormal VEMP parameters after treatment.Conclusion: Combined oVEMP and cVEMP are objective tools for assessing vestibular otolithic end organ function during dynamic functional recovery from vestibular diseases.

Cervical Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential in Children with Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder of prelingual onset

children with ANSD of pre-lingual onset, and to compare c-VEMP findings to those in children with non- ANSD sensorineural (non -ANSD SNHL) of pre-lingual onset.Methods: The study included 35 children with bilateral ANSD, and 32 children with bilateral non-ANSD SNHL of severe, severe to profound, or profound degree. Both groups of children had the onset SNHL pre-lingually. The study also included 15 control children. Mean age and SD were 6.9 years ± 2.9 for the control children, 7.8 years ± 3.1 for the ANSD children, and 8.8 years ± 3.4 for the non-ANSD children. All participant children were subjected to full history taking, otological examination, hearing assessment, recording for auditory brainstem response and cochlear microphonics, Distortion product otoacoustic emission recording, and c-VEMP recording.Results: Results showed that the vast majority of ANSD children (88% of ears) had intact c-VEMP response. Moreover, there was no statistically significant difference between the ANSD children and control children as regards the VEMP parameters (P1-N1 amplitude, asymmetric ratio, P1 latency, N1 latency, and inter-aural latency differences of P1 and N1). There was no statistically significant difference between ANSD with risk factors and those without risk factors as regards VEMP parameters. Results indicate that the vast majority of ANSD children with pre-lingual onset, even those with risk factors, have normal saccular function along with intact and normally functioning inferior vestibular nerve, and the other central connections responsible for the VEMP response. On the other hand, 53.1% of ears children with non-ANSD SNHL had an absent c-VEMP response, and 46.9% of ears had intact and normal c-VEMP response. The overall results indicate that while the pathology of non-ANSD SNHL involves the saccule in more than half of children, the underlying pathology ANSD spares the saccule and its central connection.Conclusions: Results suggest that the site of lesion in ANSD children of pre-lingual onset is restricted to the auditory system with sparing the vestibular system in the majority of children. These findings support the choice of cochlear implantation as the best line of management in children with ANSD, even in the presence of risk factors. So cochlear implantation in children with ANSD is safer than children with SNHL as there will be no fear of bilateral saccular dysfunction in the case saccular damage occurred in the surgery side as a result of the surgical procedure.

Air-Conducted Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potential Testing in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults: Thresholds, Frequency Tuning, and Effects of Sound Exposure.

Pediatric vestibular evaluations incorporate cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potential (c- and oVEMP, respectively) testing; however, in children, c- and oVEMP thresholds have been minimally investigated and frequency tuning is unknown. Children are also at risk for unsafe sound exposure secondary to VEMP. While it is unknown if VEMP threshold testing leads to cochlear changes, it is possible that this risk increases due to the increased number of trials needed to obtain a threshold. Obtaining VEMP thresholds at various frequencies in children provides further information for pediatric normative VEMP data. Assessing for cochlear changes after VEMP threshold testing would provide information on the safety of threshold VEMP testing in children. The objectives of this study were to (1) characterize c- and oVEMP thresholds in children, adolescents, and young adults with normal hearing using 500 and 750 Hz tone burst (TB) stimuli, (2) compare frequency tuning of 500 and 750 Hz TB, and (3) assess whether cochlear changes exist after VEMP threshold testing. It is hypothesized that children, adolescents, and young adults would not show age-related changes to the vestibular system. Therefore, reliable VEMP thresholds would be seen below maximum acoustical stimulation levels (e.g., <125 dB SPL) and frequency tuning will be similar for 500 and 750 Hz TB stimuli. Ten children (age 4-9), 10 adolescents (age 10-19), and 10 young adults (age 20-29) with normal hearing and tympanometry participated. All subjects received c- and oVEMP testing at maximum stimulation and threshold. To address frequency tuning, but not exceed recommended sound exposure allowance, subjects received a 500 Hz TB stimulus in one ear and a 750 Hz TB stimulus in the other ear. Subjects completed tympanometry pre-VEMP, and audiometric threshold testing, distortion product otoacoustic emission testing, and subjective questionnaire pre- and post-VEMP to study the effect of VEMP exposure on cochlear function for each stimulus frequency. (1) cVEMP thresholds were determined for both stimulus frequencies for children (500 Hz = 106 dB SPL; 750 Hz = 106 dB SPL), adolescents (500 Hz = 107.5 dB SPL; 750 Hz = 109.5 dB SPL), and young adults (500 Hz = 111.5 dB SPL; 750 Hz = 112 dB SPL). oVEMP thresholds were also obtained in response to both stimulus frequencies for children (500 Hz = 111.1 dB SPL; 750 Hz = 112.2 dB SPL), adolescents (500 Hz = 112.5 dB SPL; 750 Hz = 114.5 dB SPL), and young adults (500 Hz = 116 dB SPL; 750 Hz = 117 dB SPL). Similar thresholds were found between groups except for children who had significantly lower thresholds compared with adults for cVEMP (500 Hz: p = 0.002; 750 Hz: p = 0.004) and oVEMP (500 Hz: p = 0.01; 750 Hz: p = 0.02). In addition, equivalent ear-canal volume and VEMP thresholds were linearly correlated. (2) There was no significant effect of stimulus frequency on VEMP response rates, latencies, peak to peak amplitudes, or thresholds, suggesting similar frequency tuning for 500 and 750 Hz. (3) There were no significant effects of VEMP threshold testing on cochlear function for either stimulus frequency. Children, adolescents, and young adults show VEMP thresholds below high stimulation levels and had similar frequency tuning between 500 and 750 Hz. Use of 750 Hz could be regarded as the safer stimuli due to its shorter duration and thus reduced sound exposure. Children with smaller ear-canal volume had present responses at maximum stimulation and lower thresholds, suggesting that VEMP testing could be initiated at lower acoustic levels to minimize sound exposure and optimize testing.