Velopharyngeal Insufficiency In Patients Research Articles

Nasal rustle: An evidence-based description

“Nasal rustle” (also known as “nasal turbulence”) is a loud nasal distortion that can be heard during speech production in certain children with velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI). It occurs when there is a leak of airflow into the nasal cavity through a small velopharyngeal opening. While the perception of audible nasal emission—including nasal rustle—is a standard means for the diagnosis of VPI, there is no consensus on the sound generation mechanism. Current hypotheses include aerodynamic turbulence, velar flutter, and bubbling of mucus secretion. This study investigates the correlation between the acoustic signal of nasal rustle and physical movement at the superior velopharyngeal port. Several pediatric VPI patients were recorded via high-speed video nasopharyngoscopy and simultaneous nasometry during production of speech sounds susceptible to nasal rustle. Instances of perceived nasal rustle in the acoustic signal were identified and compared with the high-speed video. A high correlation was found between the bubbling frequency of mucus secretion above the velopharyngeal port and frequencies in the nasal acoustic signal, suggesting that secretion bubbling is a mechanism for generating nasal rustle. From this analysis, an integrated description of nasal rustle invoking physiological, physical, and acoustic principles is proposed.“Nasal rustle” (also known as “nasal turbulence”) is a loud nasal distortion that can be heard during speech production in certain children with velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI). It occurs when there is a leak of airflow into the nasal cavity through a small velopharyngeal opening. While the perception of audible nasal emission—including nasal rustle—is a standard means for the diagnosis of VPI, there is no consensus on the sound generation mechanism. Current hypotheses include aerodynamic turbulence, velar flutter, and bubbling of mucus secretion. This study investigates the correlation between the acoustic signal of nasal rustle and physical movement at the superior velopharyngeal port. Several pediatric VPI patients were recorded via high-speed video nasopharyngoscopy and simultaneous nasometry during production of speech sounds susceptible to nasal rustle. Instances of perceived nasal rustle in the acoustic signal were identified and compared with the high-speed video. A high correlation was found b...

Surgical Outcomes for Speech Surgery in 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome: The Dilemma of Persistent Velopharyngeal Insufficiency After Pharyngeal Flap Operation.

The majority of patients with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome suffer from velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI). Patients with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22qDS) commonly present with a large central velopharyngeal gap in the setting of poor velar and pharyngeal wall motion. The posterior pharyngeal flap is considered the most effective technique to treat VPI in this complex patient group. This study aims to critically evaluate success rates of surgical management of VPI in 22qDS patients and discuss options for management of a failed posterior pharyngeal flap (PPF) with persistent VPI. A systematic review was performed through MEDLINE and Scopus to examine the outcomes of PPF surgery to treat VPI in patients with 22qDS. Complications were defined as persistent VPI, hyponasal speech, and obstructive sleep apnea. To demonstrate an approach to management, the authors outline a recent patient with a failed PPF in this patient population at the authors' institution. The authors comprehensively reviewed 58 articles, 13 of which contained relevant information with extractable data. Of the 159 patients with 22qDS who underwent PPF to treat VPI, successful outcomes were reported in 135 patients (80%; range: 0%-100%). Complications were reported in 14% of patients, with need for revision operations in 3%. Surgical management of VPI in patients with 22qDS is challenging, with variable success rates reported in the literature. If unsuccessful, the surgeon faces additional challenges with the revision surgery including a scarred PPF donor site, distorted palatal recipient site, and further medialization of internal carotid arteries. Surgical revision of a failed PPF requires meticulous preoperative planning and technical execution.

Repeat Double-Opposing Z-Plasty for the Management of Persistent Velopharyngeal Insufficiency.

Persistent velopharyngeal insufficiency occurrence after double-opposing Z-plasty has been treated with either posterior pharyngeal flap or sphincteroplasty. Both these methods can be accompanied by mild discomfort, such as mouth breathing and hyponasal resonance, and can lead to severe complications, such as sleep apnea and upper airway compromise. The purpose of this study was to review the efficacy of repeat double-opposing Z-plasty for the management of persistent velopharyngeal insufficiency in patients who received a prior surgical intervention by double-opposing Z-plasty. All patients who were treated by repeat double-opposing Z-plasty between January 2000 and December 2014 were reviewed. Patient demographics, cleft type, surgical technique, and complications, such as wound dehiscence, infection, fistula, and upper airway obstruction, were evaluated. Preoperative and postoperative speech evaluations were reviewed for comparison. Fourteen patients underwent repeat double-opposing Z-plasty, with an average follow-up of 34 months. There was no complication including wound dehiscence, flap necrosis, fistula, or upper airway compromise. Velopharyngeal competence (resonance, nasal emission, intraoral pressure, social/personal problems) was significantly improved postoperatively (P < 0.05). Only 1 patient required posterior pharyngeal flap for persistent velopharyngeal insufficiency. Repeat double-opposing Z-plasty is an effective and safe surgical strategy for the management of persistent velopharyngeal insufficiency, in patients who received a prior surgical intervention by double-opposing Z-plasty. This strategy allows speech improvement and reduces the risk of postoperative upper airway compromise.

A Treatment Protocol for Velopharyngeal Insufficiency and the Outcome.

A simple algorithm is applied to treat velopharyngeal insufficiency. The purpose of this study was to assess its success rate and complications. The diagnosis includes speech perceptual assessment and nasopharyngoscopy, focusing on velopharyngeal closure ratio. The treatment is composed of a double-opposing Z-plasty for marginal velopharyngeal insufficiency or a pharyngeal flap for moderate to severe velopharyngeal insufficiency. A retrospective chart review was conducted for 84 consecutive nonsyndromic postpalatoplasty patients undergoing velopharyngeal insufficiency surgery from August of 2007 to December of 2014. The demographic, perioperative, and follow-up data were collected. Statistical analyses were performed. Mean age at velopharyngeal insufficiency surgery was 7.0 years. The overall improvement rate for patients was 86.9 percent. Nine patients in the double-opposing Z-plasty group and two patients in the pharyngeal flap group were refractory to velopharyngeal insufficiency surgery. The improvement rates for each surgical group were 80.4 percent for the double-opposing Z-plasty group and 94.7 percent for the pharyngeal flap group. There were no significant differences in postoperative velopharyngeal function between the coronal and noncoronal groups. Airway-associated complications were observed in nine patients (10.7 percent). The complications in the double-opposing Z-plasty group were observed in two patients (4.3 percent), and none of the patients presented obstructive sleep apnea. Seven patients (18.4 percent) in the pharyngeal flap group showed postoperative snoring, and one (2.6 percent) of them presented with obstructive sleep apnea. The authors' algorithm is a simple patient- and surgeon-friendly strategy to obtain satisfactory improvement of velopharyngeal function for velopharyngeal insufficiency patients, with a low risk of airway complications. Therapeutic, IV.

Pharyngeal Flap Is Effective Treatment for Post Maxillary Advancement Velopharyngeal Insufficiency in Patients With Repaired Cleft Lip and Palate

Patients with repaired cleft lip and cleft palate (CL/P) can develop velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) after Le Fort I maxillary advancement. The aim of this study was to evaluate speech outcomes in patients who required a pharyngeal flap after Le Fort I maxillary advancement. This retrospective cohort study included all patients with repaired CL/P who underwent a Le Fort I osteotomy and subsequently required a pharyngeal flap to correct VPI. Patients were included if they had outcome measurements documented at 3 time points: 1) before Le Fort I (baseline), 2) after Le Fort I, and 3) after pharyngeal flap. Outcome measurements, including speech characteristics (resonance, nasal emission, and intraoral pressure) and velopharyngeal function, were evaluated on perceptual assessment by a speech pathologist specializing in cleft care. Velopharyngeal closure was assessed with multi-view videofluoroscopy or nasopharyngoscopy. Patient characteristics and descriptive statistics were summarized and continuous data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Repeated-measures analysis of variance and paired samples t test were used to measure changes in speech outcome variables between time points. All P values were 2-tailed and considered significant for values less than .05. There were 23 patients for analysis (13 girls [56.5%] and 10 boys [43.5%]). Two patients (9%) had cleft palate only, 9 (39%) had unilateral cleft lip and palate (CLP), and 12 (52%) had bilateral CLP. Follow-up evaluations performed on average 12months postoperatively showed statistically meaningful improvement for all variables, including decreased hypernasality, reduced nasal emission, and increased intraoral pressure for consonant production. Patients with repaired CL/P who had VPI after Le Fort I maxillary advancement showed significant improvement in all outcome measurements after pharyngeal flap (P < .001). The superiorly based pharyngeal flap is highly successful in correcting VPI after Le Fort I maxillary advancement in patients with repaired CL/P.

Lateralization of the Pharyngeal Flap for Treatment of Lateral Velopharyngeal Gap.

Pharyngeal flap is usually used for treatment of velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI); it is bridged between the posterior pharyngeal wall and the soft palate traversing the central part of the velopharyngeal port. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of lateralization of the pharyngeal flap for treatment of VPI in patients with lateral velopharyngeal gap. Fifteen patients with VPI due to lateral velopharyngeal gap were subjected to closure of the gap by pharyngeal flap that was lateralized to fill the gap. Preoperative and postoperative assessment of velopharyngeal functions including flexible nasopharyngoscopy, auditory perceptual assessment (APA), and nasometric assessment were performed. Postoperatively, flexible nasopharyngoscopy showed complete velopharyngeal closure in all the patients, with significant improvement of speech parameters as measured by APA. Also, nasalance score showed significant improvement for oral and nasal sentences that was measured by nasometry. Lateralization of the pharyngeal flap for treatment of VPI in patients with lateral velopharyngeal gap is an effective method; it improves the velopharyngeal closure and the speech of the patients.

Rhinopharyngeal autologous fat injection for treatment of velopharyngeal insufficiency in patients with cleft palate.

Patients with cleft palate are prone to velopharyngeal insufficiency. In minor cases or when hypernasal speech does not resolve after velopharyngoplasty, an augmentation pharyngoplasty with autologous fat can be proposed. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the short-term (within 2 months) and long-term efficiency (during the 24 months following the procedure) of our procedure in the setting of velopharyngeal insufficiency related to a cleft palate. Twenty-two patients with cleft palate related velopharyngeal insufficiency were included in this retrospective study. All patients were operated following the same technique, in the same institution. The pre- and postoperative evaluations included a nasometry, a subjective evaluation using the Borel-Maisonny score, and a nasofibroscopy to assess the degree of velopharyngeal closure. Scores of Borel-Maisonny and nasometry were compared before, shortly after the procedure (within 2 months) and long term after the procedure (within 24 months). Forty-one procedures in 22 patients with a cleft palate performed in our institution between October 2004 and January 2012 were included in the study. Nine patients had a previous velopharyngoplasty with persistent rhinolalia despite intensive speech therapy. In 14 patients the procedure was repeated because of recurrent hypernasal speech after the first injection. The average number of procedures per patient was 1.8. Postoperative nasometry and Borel-Maisonny scores were statistically significantly improved and remained stable until the end of the follow-up (median 42 months postoperative) in most patients. Complications were rare and minor. Autologous fat injection is a simple procedure for treatment of minor velopharyngeal insufficiencies in patients with cleft palate, with good long-term results and few complications.

Submucous cleft palate: a systematic review of surgical management based on perceptual and instrumental analysis.

Objective : Submucous cleft palate (SMCP) is a congenital condition associated with abnormal development of the soft palate musculature. In a proportion of cases, this results in velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI), the treatment for which includes pharyngeal flap surgery, pharyngoplasty, and palate reconstruction. The aim of this paper is to determine whether there is superiority of one or more types of surgical procedure over the others in improving speech in patients with VPI secondary to SMCP. Methodology : Nine databases, including MEDLINE and EMBASE, were searched between inception and January 2013 to identify articles published relating to the surgical management of SMCP. Only studies that reported outcome measures for postoperative speech were included in the systematic review. Results : Twenty-six studies analyzing the outcomes of surgery for VPI in patients with SMCP met the inclusion criteria. In these studies, speech outcomes were measured either in a binary fashion (i.e., normal speech or evidence of VPI) or using scales of VPI severity. Of the 26 studies, only two utilized blinded speech assessment, and 12 included both preoperative and postoperative speech assessment. Conclusions : The review found little evidence to support any specific surgical intervention. This is in large part due to the inclusion of mixed etiologies within study populations and the lack of unbiased validated preoperative and postoperative speech assessment. Further methodologically rigorous studies need to be conducted to provide a secure evidence base for the surgical management of SMCP.

Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome in children with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome after operative intervention for velopharyngeal insufficiency.

Introduction: Surgical treatment of velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome is often warranted. In this patient population, VPI is characterized by poor palatal elevation and muscular hypotonia with an intact palate. We hypothesize that 22q11.2 deletion patients are at greater risk of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) after surgical correction of VPI, due, in part, to their functional hypotonia, large velopharyngeal gap size, and the need to surgically obstruct the velopharynx.Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome treated at a tertiary pediatric hospital between the years of 2002 and 2012. The incidence of VPI, need for surgery, post-operative polysomnogram, post-operative VPI assessment, and OSA treatments were evaluated.Results: Forty-three patients (18 males, 25 females, ages 1–14 years) fitting the inclusion criteria were identified. Twenty-eight patients were evaluated by speech pathology due to hypernasality. Twenty-one patients had insufficient velopharyngeal function and required surgery. Fifteen underwent pharyngeal flap surgery, three underwent sphincter pharyngoplasty, two underwent Furlow palatoplasty, and one underwent combined sphincter pharyngoplasty with Furlow palatoplasty. Of these, eight had post-operative snoring. Six of these underwent polysomnography (five underwent pharyngeal flap surgeries and one underwent sphincter pharyngoplasty). Four patients were found to have OSA based on the results of the polysomnography (average apnea/hypopnea index of 4.9 events/h, median = 5.1, SD = 2.1). Two required continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) due to moderate OSA.Conclusion: Surgery is often necessary to correct VPI in patients with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. Monitoring for OSA should be considered after surgical correction of VPI due to a high occurrence in this population. Furthermore, families should be counseled of the risk of OSA after surgery and the potential need for treatment with CPAP.

Submucous Cleft Palate: A Systematic Review of Surgical Management Based on Perceptual and Instrumental Analysis.

Objective: Submucous cleft palate (SMCP) is a congenital condition associated with abnormal development of the soft palate musculature. In a proportion of cases, this results in velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI), the treatment for which includes pharyngeal flap surgery, pharyngoplasty, and palate reconstruction. The aim of this paper is to determine whether there is superiority of one or more types of surgical procedure over the others in improving speech in patients with VPI secondary to SMCP. Methodology: Nine databases, including MEDLINE and EMBASE, were searched between inception and January 2013 to identify articles published relating to the surgical management of SMCP. Only studies that reported outcome measures for postoperative speech were included in the systematic review. Results: Twenty-six studies analyzing the outcomes of surgery for VPI in patients with SMCP met the inclusion criteria. In these studies, speech outcomes were measured either in a binary fashion (i.e., normal speech or evidence of VPI) or using scales of VPI severity. Of the 26 studies, only two utilized blinded speech assessment, and 12 included both preoperative and postoperative speech assessment. Conclusions: The review found little evidence to support any specific surgical intervention. This is in large part due to the inclusion of mixed etiologies within study populations and the lack of unbiased validated preoperative and postoperative speech assessment. Further methodologically rigorous studies need to be conducted to provide a secure evidence base for the surgical management of SMCP.

Cadaveric Study of the Posterior Pedicle Nasoseptal Flap

The posterior pedicle nasoseptal flap has been the workhorse for endoscopic reconstruction of medium to large cranial base defects, with excellent outcomes and minimal flap failures. The authors present the anatomical foundations for the use of the nasoseptal flap for reconstruction of soft palate and pharyngeal defects and for surgical treatment of velopharyngeal insufficiency in a cadaveric model. Posterior pedicle nasoseptal flaps were endoscopically harvested and transposed to the naso/oropharynx in seven cadavers. The reach and relationships of the flap with nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal structures were documented. A total of nine nasoseptal flaps (bilateral in two specimens) were transposed into the nasopharynx and oropharynx. The most anterior aspect of the flap was visualized transorally several millimeters inferior to the soft palate in all specimens. Six flaps were sutured transorally to the posterior pharyngeal wall and three were sutured to defects of the soft palate. The width of a fully harvested flap (entire septal mucosa) was more than twice the width of the posterior nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal wall in all specimens. Nasoseptal flaps were easily tailored endoscopically and transorally with standard instrumentation to fit the defects. In a cadaveric model, the nasoseptal flap can be transposed into the nasopharynx and upper oropharynx and is a potential alternative for pharyngeal reconstruction and surgical treatment of velopharyngeal insufficiency in patients in whom traditional flaps are not available. The application of this technique for reconstruction of pharyngeal and velar defects is novel, and further studies evaluating clinical outcomes are needed.

Superiorly Based Pharyngeal Flap for Treatment of Velopharyngeal Insufficiency in Patients With 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome

There are no previous blinded studies for comparison of preoperative versus postoperative perceptual speech assessments when using a pharyngeal flap for treating velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) in patients diagnosed with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of superiorly based pharyngeal flap surgery on speech in these patients using blinded judgments of experienced speech therapists. A retrospective study of 12 consecutive patients who had undergone pharyngeal flap surgery for treatment of VPI between 2002 and 2009 was conducted. Seven girls and 5 boys between 4 and 15 (median, 6) years old at the time of surgery were included in the study. Six patients were born with a submucous cleft palate (including 2 occult), and 1 patient, with an overt cleft palate. The remaining 5 patients had no signs of a palatal pathology. All palatal clefts had been repaired before pharyngeal flap surgery except in 2 patients with occult submucous cleft palate. Preoperative and postoperative audio recordings were blinded for scoring independently by 3 senior speech therapists. There was a significant improvement in hypernasality (P = 0.002), audible nasal emission (P = 0.033), weak pressure consonants (P = 0.008), and speech intelligibility (P = 0.021) after pharyngeal flap surgery. Hyponasality did not develop significantly with surgery. One patient was diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea. Superiorly based pharyngeal flap resulted in a significant speech improvement in 12 consecutive patients with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome having VPI.

Speech Outcome after Palatal Repair in Nonsyndromic versus Syndromic Robin Sequence

The authors' purpose was to document speech outcome after cleft palate repair in patients with syndromic versus nonsyndromic Robin sequence. Results of secondary correction of velopharyngeal insufficiency using a superiorly based pharyngeal flap or double-opposing Z-palatoplasty are also reported. Charts of patients with Robin sequence and cleft palate between 1980 and 2007 were reviewed. Data collected included date of birth, sex, syndrome/association, cleft palatal type (Veau I or II), age at palatoplasty, incidence of palatal fistula, postoperative speech assessment, videofluoroscopic results, need for secondary operation for velopharyngeal insufficiency, and type of secondary operation (pharyngeal flap or double-opposing Z-palatoplasty). The authors identified 140 patients with Robin sequence who had palatal closure. Postoperative speech evaluation was available for 96 patients (69 percent). A syndrome or association was identified in 42 patients (30 percent). Primary palatoplasty was successful in 74 patients (77 percent); speech was characterized as competent and competent to borderline competent. The authors found a significantly higher incidence of velopharyngeal insufficiency following palatal repair for syndromic (38 percent) than nonsyndromic Robin sequence (16 percent). (p = 0.039). In patients with velopharyngeal insufficiency, competent or borderline competent speech was determined after double-opposing Z-palatoplasty (two of five patients) or pharyngeal flap (eight of 10 patients). The rate of velopharyngeal insufficiency in syndromic Robin sequence is significantly greater than in nonsyndromic Robin sequence. The authors prefer pharyngeal flap for velopharyngeal insufficiency in patients with Robin sequence, whether syndromic or nonsyndromic, without retrognathism or signs/symptoms of obstructive sleep apnea.

Recent Advances in Surgical Pharyngeal Modification Procedures for the Treatment of Velopharyngeal Insufficiency in Patients With Cleft Palate

Background To review recent advances in pharyngeal modification procedures for the treatment of velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) in patients with cleft palate after primary repair. In addition, we discuss some of the advantages and disadvantages of the various pharyngoplasty techniques, as well as their safety and efficacy. Methods A review of frequently used pharyngeal modification techniques in correction of VPI was performed, and their advantages and disadvantages are outlined. Several techniques in pharyngoplasty most recently described in the literature are compared and contrasted. Results The goal of surgical pharyngeal modification procedures is to correct the abnormal failure of velopharyngeal closure. Multiple techniques used in VPI surgery have proven to be effective. They have similar adverse effect profiles, but what distinguishes them is likely their effectiveness in cases of severe VPI. Conclusions Velopharyngeal insufficiency is a problematic issue both for the patient and the treating surgeon. The negative effect of VPI on patients' quality of life has long been known, and over the years numerous techniques have been described to correct or improve this problem. Pharyngoplasty and pharyngeal flap or combination procedures are most effective in cases of severe VPI.

Recent Advances in Surgical Pharyngeal Modification Procedures for the Treatment of Velopharyngeal Insufficiency in Patients With Cleft Palate

Recent Advances in Surgical Pharyngeal Modification Procedures for the Treatment of Velopharyngeal Insufficiency in Patients With Cleft Palate

Noncleft Velopharyngeal Insufficiency: Etiology and Need For Surgical Treatment

Objective. Velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) occurs frequently in cleft palate patients. VPI also occurs in patients without cleft palate, but little is known about this patient population and this presents a diagnostic dilemma. Our goal is to review the etiology of noncleft VPI and the surgical treatment involved. Design/Patients. A retrospective review of VPI patients from 1990 to 2005. Demographic, genetic, speech, and surgical data were collected. We compared the need for surgery and outcomes data between noncleft and cleft VPI patients using a Student's t-test. Results. We identified 43 patients with noncleft VPI, of which 24 were females and 19 were males. The average age at presentation of noncleft VPI was 9.6 years (range 4.5–21). The average patient age at the time of study was 13.4 years. The etiology of VPI in these noncleft patients was neurologic dysfunction 44%, syndrome-associated 35%, postadenotonsillectomy 7%, and multiple causes 14%. The need for surgical intervention in the noncleft VPI group was 37% (15/43) compared to the cleft palate controls, which was 27% (12/43). There was not a statistical difference between these two groups (P > 0.5). Conclusion. Noncleft VPI often occurs in patients who have underlying neurologic disorders or have syndromes. The rate of speech surgery to address VPI is similar to that of cleft palate patients. We propose that newly diagnosed noncleft VPI patients should undergo a thorough neurologic and genetic evaluation prior to surgery.

Research on Construction of the Korean Speech Corpus in Patient with Velopharyngeal Insufficiency

Received June 15, 2012 Revised July 25, 2012 Accepted July 26, 2012 Address for correspondence Tack-Kyun Kwon, MD, PhD Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 110-744, Korea Tel +82-2-2072-0738 Fax +82-2-745-2387 E-mail kwontk@snu.ac.kr Background and ObjectivesZZWe aimed to develop a Korean version of the velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) speech corpus system. Subjects and MethodZZAfter developing a 3-channel simultaneous speech recording device capable of recording nasal/oral and normal compound speech separately, voice data were collected from VPI patients aged more than 10 years with/without the history of operation or prior speech therapy. This was compared to a control group for which VPI was simulated by using a french-3 nelaton tube inserted via both nostril through nasopharynx and pulling the soft palate anteriorly in varying degrees. The study consisted of three transcriptors: a speech therapist transcribed the voice file into text, a second transcriptor graded speech intelligibility and severity and the third tagged the types and onset times of misarticulation. The database were composed of three main tables regarding (1) speaker’s demographics, (2) condition of the recording system and (3) transcripts. All of these were interfaced with the Praat voice analysis program, which enables the user to extract exact transcribed phrases for analysis. ResultsZZIn the simulated VPI group, the higher the severity of VPI, the higher the nasalance score was obtained. In addition, we could verify the vocal energy that characterizes hypernasality and compensation in nasal/oral and compound sounds spoken by VPI patients as opposed to that characgerizes the normal control group. ConclusionZZWith the Korean version of VPI speech corpus system, patients’ common difficulties and speech tendencies in articulation can be objectively evaluated. Comparing these data with those of the normal voice, mispronunciation and dysarticulation of patients with VPI can be corrected. Korean J Otorhinolaryngol-Head Neck Surg 2012;55:498-507

The management of velopharyngeal insufficiency with Furlow double-opposing Z-plasty procedure

The aim of the study was an evaluation of Furlow’s method in correction of velopharyngeal insufficiency. A prospective study was conducted by a speech pathologist and a plastic surgeon. Rating of hypernasality and speech intelligibility were completed prior to and after surgical intervention. Nasometric measurements were also performed before and after surgical intervention. From May 2003 through September 2006, the first author performed 44 Furlow surgeries for the treatment of velopharyngeal insufficiency in patients with cleft palate. Patients with short, repaired cleft palates but with preserved normal function of pharyngeal sphincter qualified for the operation. The surgery was performed using double-opposing Z-plasty. The method was used in 24 males and 20 females aged from 6 to 25 years (mean age, 12 years). One patient (2%) developed wound dehiscence, and two further patients (4.5%) developed maceration of the wound margins, which delayed the healing process by only several days. Very good, good, or moderate results were obtained in 41 patients (91%). Poor outcome of treatment—excessive hypernasality or poor speech quality after the operation—was still present in four patients (9%). In our opinion, Furlow’s method is a very useful treatment method in patients with velopharyngeal insufficiency especially with sagittal orientation of levator veli palatini muscles.

Velopharyngeal insufficiency in hemifacial microsomia: Analysis of correlated factors

To investigate the incidence of unilateral hypodynamic palate (UHP) and velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) in hemifacial microsomia (HFM), and to determine the dysmorphic manifestations having significant associations with UHP/VPI in HFM. This was a nonrandomized study of 48 patients with unilateral HFM without cleft palate. The correlation between each anomaly and UHP/VPI was analyzed statistically. In addition, we observed 4 HFM patients with cleft palate to examine the influence on cleft palate speech. The incidence of UHP in HFM was 50.0% and that of VPI was 14.6%. All the VPI patients had UHP. Severe micrognathia and soft tissue deficiency, macrostomia, and mental retardation were significant risk factors for developing VPI in HFM. Moreover, UHP exacerbated speech in HFM with cleft lip and palate. Significant correlations were detected between VPI and HFM. This finding should be helpful in the overall management of HFM.

Does Velopharyngeal Closure Pattern Affect the Success of Pharyngeal Flap Pharyngoplasty?

Historically at The Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto, pharyngeal flap pharyngoplasty has been the treatment of choice for treatment of velopharyngeal insufficiency, regardless of velopharyngeal closure pattern. The authors hypothesize that pharyngeal flap pharyngoplasty is more effective in treating velopharyngeal insufficiency in patients with circular or sagittal velopharyngeal closure and less effective in treating the coronal closure pattern. Ninety-three patients who underwent superiorly based pharyngeal flap surgery for velopharyngeal insufficiency were evaluated in a retrospective chart review. Closure pattern was determined preoperatively by nasopharyngoscopy or multiview videofluoroscopy. Nasalance was assessed preoperatively and at 6 weeks and 1 year postoperatively. Nasalance during nonnasal speech was decreased on average, for all closure patterns, postoperatively. However, a significantly higher percentage of patients were corrected to normal nasalance scores in thenoncoronal group than in the coronal group (57 percent versus 35 percent, respectively) at 1 year postoperatively (p < 0.05). Surgical overcorrection, as determined by postoperative hyponasality, occurred at a rate of 13 percent in the coronal group versus 7 percent in the noncoronal group (not statistically significant). The results demonstrate that hypernasality in patients with a coronal velopharyngeal closure pattern can be improved by pharyngeal flap pharyngoplasty. This procedure, however, is more frequently effective in correcting noncoronal closure pattern velopharyngeal insufficiency than coronal pattern velopharyngeal insufficiency. The authors are now more selective in their approach to the management of velopharyngeal insufficiency and are more inclined to treat coronal pattern velopharyngeal insufficiency with sphincter pharyngoplasty.