Vein Reflux Research Articles

Techniques for Embolization of the Ovarian Vein and Pelvic Reservoir

Pelvic venous disorders are a common and under diagnosed cause of chronic pelvic pain in women, presenting with chronic, noncyclical pelvic pain for greater than 6 months and the presence of pelvic varicosities. Pelvic varices and ovarian vein reflux are a strong indicator of venous origin chronic pelvic and may benefit from embolization. This most commonly occurs in multiparous, premenopausal women with symptoms of gravity dependent pelvic pain and postcoital pain. Additional causes of pelvic venous disorders include iliac vein compression, internal iliac vein reflux, and renal vein compression, however for the purposes of this article we will focus on ovarian vein insufficiency. The mainstay of treatment for pelvic venous insufficiency is Ovarian Vein Embolization and embolization of the pelvic venous reservoir. This article will focus on the patient presentation and workup, followed by a detailed summary of how to perform this procedure, current research to support treatment, possible technical challenges and complications, and finally future research priorities.

Increased Lower Extremity Pain During Menstruation in Patients With Chronic Venous Insufficiency

We noted some patients with chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) whose pain worsened during menstruation. Limited research is available regarding whether lower extremity pain from CVI worsens with menses. The aim of this survey is to determine if there is significant lower extremity pain with menses in patients with CVI and what factors may be associated with it. Patients with lower extremity pain and CVI were asked whether their pain worsened during menses. Data was collected between March 2017 and August 2020. Participants consisted of 278 consecutive patients with ages ranging from 26 to 57 years (mean, 41.81 ± 8.52 years). Data was also collected on patient age, degree of venous reflux on their most recent duplex, and presenting symptoms. For statistical analysis, one-way analysis of variance tests were used. Among all patients, 40% did experience worsening of lower extremity pain with menses. There was no significant mean age difference between those who reported worsening and those that did not (P = .513). There was no significant mean difference in degree of presenting symptoms and those that reported worsening and those that did not (P = .092). Also, there was no significant mean difference in the right great saphenous vein reflux in those that reported worsening and those that did not (P = .585). Lastly, there was no significant mean difference in the left great saphenous vein reflux in those that reported worsening and those that did not (P = .648). Of all patients surveyed, 40% reported worsening of their lower extremity pain during their menstruation. The degree of venous reflux, age, and degree of presenting symptoms of patients does not seem to be associated with whether they reported worsening or not. These findings suggest that some women with CVI experience increased pain during menstruation. These findings may have important implications in understanding what is modulating increased lower extremity pain during menstruation in patients with CVI.

C32 CONSTRICTIVE PERICARDITIS WITH PLATYPNEA ORTHODEOXIA

Abstract A 56–year–old woman is admitted to our centre for biventricular heart failure. In anamnesis she reports a submandibular phlegmon complicated by pleuropericarditis at the age of 13 years requiring repeated pericardiocentesis. In the last three years she has been hospitalised twice for ascites and discharged with a diagnosis of idiopathic liver cirrhosis. On admission she presented with peripheral oedema, ascites and hippocratic fingers; oxygen saturation is 80% in room air. On blood tests creatinine, transaminases, albumin, coagulation and NT–proBNP are normal, bilirubin is elevated. An echocardiography is performed showing a calcific spicola impinging the free wall of the right ventricle producing endocavitary obstruction; diffusely thickened pericardium, septal bounce, annulus reversus and expiratory reflux in the suprahepatic veins. Biventricular contractile function is normal and no significant valvulopathy is present. CT scan confirms the presence of diffuse pericardial calcifications, small liver and irregular profile with large ascitic effusion. Decongestive therapy is started with weight loss of 22 kg and regression of oedema but severe hypoxia persists with evidence of platypnea–orthodeoxia syndrome. An echocardiography is repeated showing passage of microbubbles in the left atrium from the sixth beat onwards, compatible with intrapulmonary shunt. A large arteriovenous malformation (AVM) of the right lower pulmonary branch is found at CT angiography, which is also revealed by targeted invasive angiography. Cardiac catheterisation and cardiac MRI confirmed the diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis. Percutaneous closure of the AVM with complete resolution of the hypoxia and subsequent pericardiectomy is performed. The patient is discharged on day XXVII with normal saturation on room air, in good haemodynamic compensation and with normal liver stasis parameters. In conclusion, constrictive pericarditis is a rare cause of heart failure and to our knowledge this is the second case described reporting a pulmonary AVM secondary to constrictive pericarditis.

Cyanoacrylate adhesive closure in the European and American 2022 clinical practice guidelines

Over the last decade non-thermal non-tumescent (NTNT) methods of truncal reflux elimination in chronic venous disease (CVD) are becoming increasingly popular. The main NTNT modalities are mechanochemical ablation and cyanoacrylate adhesive closure (CAC). The advantages of non-thermal ablation are avoidance of tumescent anesthesia, low periprocedural pain and bruising, high patient comfort and satisfaction rates. CAC method has an additional benefit of avoiding the postprocedural compression. CAC is one of promising non-thermal ablation procedures, that leads to truncal vein occlusion and reflux elimination via endovenous delivery of n-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate. This review is aimed at assessment of the updated European and American clinical practice guidelines on CVD management, particularly the role of CAC. Current evidence shows high efficacy and safety of the CAC, its advantages regarding the periprocedural pain and ecchymoses, risk of adverse events, closure rates in the long-term, procedure and recovery time and patients’ quality of life. Therefore, along the current gold standard of varicose vein treatment – thermal ablation, the updated 2022 European and American clinical practice guidelines have significantly emphasized the role of NTNT modalities in general and CAC in particular. Specifically, the European Society for Vascular Surgeons guidelines recommend CAC for patients with great saphenous vein (GSV) incompetence when the NTNT technique is preferred. American guidelines recommend both thermal and non-thermal ablation for the patients with symptomatic axial reflux of the GSV, depending on the available expertise of the treating physician and the preference of the patient.

Surgical and endovascular treatment of pelvic venous disorder: Results of a multicentre retrospective cohort study

ObjectiveIn the present study, we investigated the clinical outcomes after gonadal vein resection (GVR) and gonadal vein embolization (GVE) with coils in patients with pelvic venous disorder (PeVD). We also assessed the rates of procedural complications and disease recurrence. MethodsOur multicenter retrospective cohort study included 361 female patients with PeVD-related chronic pelvic pain (CPP) and gonadal vein reflux who underwent GVR (n = 184) or GVE with coils (n = 177) from 1999 to 2020. The clinical outcomes (ie, presence and severity of CPP, procedural complications, disease recurrence) were assessed at 1 month and 1, 3, and 5 years after intervention. The pain intensity before and after treatment was assessed using a visual analog scale. All the patients underwent duplex ultrasound after GVR and GVE, and those with persistent CPP and suspected perforation of the gonadal vein by the coils were also evaluated by multiplanar pelvic venography. ResultsGVR and GVE was associated with the reduction or elimination of CPP at 1 month after treatment in 100% and 74% of patients and postprocedural complications in 14% and 37% of patients, respectively (Р < 0.01 for both). The most common complication after either GVR or GVE was pelvic vein thrombosis (11% and 22% patients, respectively; P < .01 between groups). GVE was associated with postembolization syndrome in 20%, coil protrusion in 6%, and coil migration in 1% of patients. The long-term recurrence rate after GVR and GVE was 6% and 16%, respectively (P < .01). ConclusionsBoth GVR and GVE were found to be effective in treating patients with PeVD. However, GVR was associated with better efficacy in the relief of CPP and lower rates of procedural complications and disease recurrence.

Early results following comparison of radiofrequency and microfoam ablation of large diameter truncal veins demonstrate high closure rates and symptomatic relief

ObjectiveEndovenous closure of truncal veins with a large diameter (LD) (≥8 mm) has been associated with higher risk of post ablation thrombus propagation into the deep venous system. Similar findings after Varithena microfoam ablation (MFA) have not been characterized. The study objective was to analyze outcomes after both radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and MFA and of LD truncal veins. MethodsA retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database was performed. All patients who underwent MFA and RFA for LD symptomatic truncal vein reflux (≥8 mm) were identified. All patients had postoperative duplex (48-72 hours) scanning. Patients underwent subsequent clinical follow-up at 3 to 6 weeks. Demographic data, CEAP Classification, Venous Clinical Severity Score, procedure details, adverse thrombotic events, and follow-up data were abstracted. ResultsBetween June 2018 and September 2022, 784 consecutive limbs (RFA, n = 560; MFA, n = 224) underwent truncal vein (great, accessory, and small saphenous) closure for symptomatic reflux. Sixty-six limbs in the MFA group met inclusion criteria. Sixty-six consecutive limbs treated with RFA during the same time period were included as a comparison group. The mean truncal vein diameter treated was 10.5 mm (RFA, 10.0 mm; MFA, 10.9 mm). Twenty-nine limbs (44%) in the RFA group underwent concomitant phlebectomy. Tributary veins were concomitantly sclerosed in 34 MFA limbs (52%). Total procedural times were shorter in the MFA group (MFA, 31.6 minutes vs RFA, 55.7 minutes) (P < .001). Immediate closure rates were 100% and 95% in the RFA and MFA groups, respectively. Venous Clinical Severity Scores improved after treatment in both groups (RFA, from 9.5 to 7.8; P ≤ .001) (MFA, from 11.3 to 9.0; P ≤ .001). In the RFA and MFA groups, 83% and 79% of venous ulcers healed during the study period, respectively. Symptomatic superficial phlebitis occurred after RFA in 11% and 17% MFA. The incidence of postablation proximal deep venous thrombus extension was 3.0% in the RFA group and 6.1% in the MFA group, which was not statistically significant. All resolved with short-term oral anticoagulant therapy. No remote deep venous thromboses or pulmonary emboli occurred in either group. ConclusionsHigh early closure rates, symptom relief and ulcer healing rates can be achieved after RFA and MFA of LD saphenous veins. Both techniques can be used safely across a wide array of CEAP classes. Longer term studies are required to characterize the durability of MFA closure and sustained symptom relief in LD truncal veins.

Treatments for symptomatic class I patients in CEAP classification with saphenous vein reflux: A pilot study

BackgroundFor patients with telangiectasia or reticular veins (CEAP [clinical, etiologic, anatomic, pathophysiologic] class C1), less invasive endovenous (EV) treatments have emerged. However, no prospective studies have compared compression stockings (CSs) and EV ablation treatment for C1 symptomatic refluxing saphenous veins. The present prospective study compared the therapeutic results of the two treatment modalities. MethodsFrom June 2020 to December 2021, 46 patients with telangiectasia or reticular veins (<3 mm; class C1) with axial saphenous reflux and venous congestion symptoms were prospectively enrolled. The patients were assigned to CS (n = 21) or EV treatment (n = 25), according to patient preference. Complications, clinical improvement scales (eg, the venous clinical severity score [VCSS]), and quality of life, including the Aberdeen varicose vein symptom severity score (AVSS) and venous insufficiency epidemiological and economic study – quality of life/symptoms (VEINES-QOL/Sym), were evaluated and compared between the two groups at 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment. ResultsNo major complications occurred in either group. The median VCSS was 2.0 (interquartile range [IQR], 1.0-2.0), 1.0 (IQR, 0.5-2.0), 1.0 (IQR 0.0-1.0), and 0.0 (IQR 0.0-1.0) at baseline and 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment in the CS group, respectively. The corresponding VCSSs were 3.0 (IQR, 1.0-3.0), 1.0 (IQR, 0.0-1.0), 0.0 (IQR, 0.0-0.0), and 0.0 (IQR, 0.0-0.0) in the EV group. The median AVSS was 4.4 (IQR, 3.0-5.5), 2.1 (IQR, 1.3-4.6), 1.0 (IQR, 0.0-2.8), and 0.0 (IQR, 0.0-1.8) at baseline and 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment in the CS group, respectively. The corresponding scores were 6.2 (IQR, 3.8-12.3), 1.6 (IQR, 0.6-2.8), 0.0 (IQR, 0.0-2.6), and 0.0 (IQR, 0.0-0.4) in the EV group. The mean VEINES-QOL/Sym score was 92.7 ± 8.1, 100.4 ± 7.3, 104.3 ± 8.2, and 106.0 ± 9.7 in the CS group at baseline and 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment, respectively. The corresponding scores were 83.6 ± 8.0, 102.9 ± 6.6, 107.9 ± 3.9, and 109.6 ± 3.7 in the EV group. Both groups showed considerable improvement in the VCSS, AVSS, and VEIN-SYM/QOL scores, and no significant between-group differences were observed for ≤6 months. Among the severely symptomatic patients (pretreatment VEINES-QOL/Sym score ≤90), the EV group exhibited more marked improvement (P = .029 for the VCSS and P = .030 for the VEINES-QOL/Sym score). ConclusionsBoth CSs and EV treatment provided clinical and quality of life improvement in symptomatic C1 patients with refluxing saphenous veins, with no significant between-group differences. However, a subgroup analysis revealed that EV treatment provided statistically significant improvement in the severe symptomatic C1 group.

Consecutive Cyanoacrylate Adhesion of the Multiple Segments With a Single Manual Compression for Great Saphenous Vein Reflux

Consecutive Cyanoacrylate Adhesion of the Multiple Segments With a Single Manual Compression for Great Saphenous Vein Reflux

Abstract No. 186 Assessment of Change in Treatment Modalities Utilized for Chronic Venous Disease and Elimination of Axial Vein Reflux

Abstract No. 186 Assessment of Change in Treatment Modalities Utilized for Chronic Venous Disease and Elimination of Axial Vein Reflux

Hemodynamic and neurobiological factors for the development of chronic pelvic pain in patients with pelvic venous disorder

ObjectiveThe study was aimed at the identification of hemodynamic and neurobiological factors for the development of chronic pelvic pain (CPP) in patients with pelvic venous disorder (PeVD) using ultrasound, radionuclide, and enzyme immunoassay methods. MethodsThis cohort study included 110 consecutive patients with PeVD and 20 healthy controls. Seventy patients with PeVD had symptoms (CPP in 100% of cases, discomfort in hypogastrium, dyspareunia, vulvar varices, and dysuria), and 40 were asymptomatic. Patients underwent clinical examination, duplex ultrasound study of the pelvic veins and lower extremities, and single-photon emission computed tomography of the pelvic veins with in vivo labeled red blood cells. The prevalence, duration, severity, and pattern of reflux in the pelvic veins, as well as the severity of pelvic venous congestion, were evaluated. Healthy controls underwent only clinical and duplex ultrasound examination. All 130 patients were assessed using enzyme immunoassays to determine plasma levels of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and substance P (SP). ResultsSymptomatic patients with PeVD had a higher prevalence of reflux in the ovarian veins (OVs) than asymptomatic ones (45.7% vs 10%, respectively; P = .001) and a greater reflux duration (4.1 ± 1.7 seconds vs 1.4 ± 0.3 seconds; P = .002), although no differences in the OV diameter were found. Similar results were obtained when comparing the diameters of the parametrial veins (PVs) and the duration of reflux in them. Type II/III reflux (greater than 2 seconds) was identified in 41.4% of symptomatic and in only 5% of asymptomatic patients (P = .001). Among patients with CPP, 24.2% had a combined reflux in the OVs, PVs, and uterine veins, and 45.7% had a combined reflux in the OVs and PVs, whereas 90% of patients without CPP had only an isolated reflux in the PVs. The pelvic venous congestion was moderate or severe in 95.7% of patients with CPP and in only 15% patients without CPP (P = .001). In patients with PeVD, the presence of CPP was associated with higher levels of CGRP and SP compared with asymptomatic patients (CGRP: 0.48 ± 0.06 vs 0.19 ± 0.02 ng/mL, respectively, P = .001; SP: 0.38 ± 0.08 vs 0.13 ± 0.03 ng/mL, P = .001). ConclusionsIn patients with PeVD, significant hemodynamic and neurobiological factors for the CPP development were found to be reflux in the pelvic veins greater than 2 seconds, involvement of several venous collectors, and increased plasma levels of CGRP and SP.

Accurate diagnosis of isolated iliac vein thrombosis in third trimester pregnancy with clues on great saphenous vein reflux: a case report and review of literature

BackgroundPregnancy is known to be a risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE). We report the case of a pregnant patient with difficult to diagnose iliac vein thrombosis, establishing a definite diagnosis by clues of great saphenous vein reflux.Case presentationA 37-year-old G1P0 woman at 35 weeks of assisted twin gestation presented with a complaint of persistent left lower limb edema and tenderness. A vascular ultrasound was used to examine the bilateral lower limb. Doppler of left lower extremity revealed continuous great saphenous vein reflux. Right saphenofemoral veins demonstrated venous stasis and no reflux. Unilateral continuous great saphenous vein reflux suggested left iliac veins obstruction or extrinsic compression. Anterograde venography showed a completely occlusive filling defect of the left external iliac vein, which is the definitive diagnosis of acute deep venous thrombosis. The patient underwent a cesarean delivery following inferior vena cava filter (IVCF) placement, and no signs of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE) were reported after delivery.ConclusionIn pregnant women with suspected deep vein thrombosis, it is imperative to assess the presence of unilateral continuous great saphenous vein reflux.

Comparing the Effects of Radial and Jacketed Laser Tip Fibers on Outcome of Endovenous Laser Ablation of Lower Limb Truncal Venous Reflux

Saphenous vein reflux is one of the leading causes of cosmetic and functional disabilities.The recent ESVS guidelines recommend endovenous thermal ablation over surgery or sclerotherapy for the treatment of great saphenous vein (GSV) reflux in patients with chronic venous disease.The aim of this study is to compare different laser fiber tip configurations to outcome regarding technical success and incidence of complications. A retrospective analysis conducted on patients with documented GSV reflux from 2020 to 2022, comparing baseline parameters and outcome between 2 groups of laser tip fibers used; radial tip and jacketed tip. Primary end point was technical success. Secondary endpoints included incidence of complications in each group, and VCSS score difference in both groups. Inclusion criteria entailed patients with primary varicose veins over the age of 18 years, free from malignancy, hematological disorders, and having documented GSV reflux of more than 0.5 seconds. All patients had endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) of the, with complementary foam sclerotherapy or ambulatory phlebectomies as required. A total of 74 patients underwent EVLA (85 limbs). 54 were done using the radial laser fibers, and 32 using jacketed fibers. Technical success was achieved in 78 limbs (92.9%), 6 limbs (7.1%) had recanalization of the proximal 3cm GSV at 1 month, 2 patients experienced hematomas, and 5 patients had superficial vein thrombosis.There was no significant association between postoperative pain, bruising, recanalization, hematoma, and superficial vein thrombosis, with different laser fiber tip configurations (p-value .95, .6, .18, 1, & 1 respectively), nor was there any significant difference in VCSS between them (p-value .14).Technical success was 90% in the jacketed fibers and 94.1% in the radial fibers group (p-value 0.18). Neither does laser fiber tip configuration nor its make have a significance on outcome of EVLA of GSV reflux. Both radial and jacketed laser fiber tips exhibit similar safety and efficacy in EVLA.

Effect of Obesity and Bariatric Surgery on Saphenous Veins.

Obesity is a risk factor for chronic venous disease (CVD) of the lower limbs (LL), affecting venous anatomy and physiology. Weight loss after bariatric surgery (BS) can reduce intra-abdominal pressure, improve mobility, and ultimately improve venous hemodynamics and CVD-related symptoms. There are no studies in the literature that adequately assess the effect of the obesity and BS on the LL veins, especially the saphenous veins (SV). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of obesity and BS on the saphenous veins. This is a longitudinal prospective study carried out from 2019 to 2021 with 19 patients, totaling 38 LL, underwent clinical evaluation (CEAP Classification) and by Doppler ultrasonography, to analyze their SV diameter and reflux measurements, in the preoperative period and again 6months to 2years after BS being performed. There was no statistical difference between the groups regarding the characteristics of reflux in the SV among the evaluated LL. There was no significant increase in the diameter of the great SV in the majority of its segments. The groups were similar in terms of the small SV diameters. Moreover, a significant reduction in the clinical class of CEAP was observed after BS. Obesity and bariatric surgery had no influence on diameter or reflux in saphenous veins, but a reduction in the CEAP Clinical Classification was observed in the postoperative period.

Evaluation of Versatility of Mechanochemical Ablation (MOCA) in the Management of Great Saphenous Vein Reflux: A Day-case Intervention with Good Outcomes

Evaluation of Versatility of Mechanochemical Ablation (MOCA) in the Management of Great Saphenous Vein Reflux: A Day-case Intervention with Good Outcomes

Venous leg ulcers and prevalence of surgically correctable reflux disease in a national registry

BackgroundChronic venous disorders are common, with varicose veins occurring in ∼40% of the population. Venous leg ulcers affect 1% to 2% of the population, with the prevalence increasing ≤4% for those aged >65 years. Both conditions are expensive and together are responsible for ≤2% of the annual healthcare budget expenditure of Western societies. The ESCHAR (effect of surgery and compression on healing and recurrence) and EVRA (early venous reflux ablation) trials demonstrated that surgical correction of superficial venous reflux reduced ulcer recurrence, resulted in faster healing times (EVRA), and was proved cost-effective. Largescale data regarding patients with chronic venous leg ulcers presenting to venous centers with treatable superficial venous insufficiency has not been previously reported. Our study was designed to evaluate the percentage of patients with leg ulcers presenting to dedicated vein centers who were found to have surgically correctable superficial venous insufficiency. MethodsThe American Vein & Lymphatic Society Patient Reported Outcome Venous Registry began collecting data in 2014 and is one of two national registries focused on chronic venous disorders. The database was queried first for the presence of an ulcer using the CEAP (clinical, etiologic, anatomic, pathophysiologic) classification (C6 status). These de-identified data were further correlated by crossing the number of ulcers for the same limb using the revised venous clinical severity score (rVCSS). The demographics, index duplex ultrasound details, and rVCSS features for ulcer duration and compression use were analyzed. Once the presence of an ulcer had been validated by CEAP and rVCSS, the population was divided into groups according to the ultrasound-reported anatomic pathology (eg, normal, reflux, obstruction, reflux plus obstruction). The query was directed toward all patients seeking a venous evaluation at participating centers from January 2018 through January 2022. ResultsMore than 270,000 unique patient records were reviewed. Of the 270,000 records, 163,027 (60%) had had duplex ultrasound scans available, for 1794 unique patients (1879 limbs), representing 1.1% with a leg wound. Of these patients, 55.4% were men and 44.6% were women. Group S included patients with isolated superficial pathology (n = 1291; 68.7%). Group M included patients with mixed superficial and deep pathology (n = 238; 12.7%). Group D included patients with isolated deep vein pathology (n = 58; 3.1%). Finally, group N included patients with leg wounds but no venous pathology (n = 292; 15.5%). The rVCSSs for groups S and M were significantly higher than those for group N. In group S, the dominant patterns involved the great saphenous vein (GSV) above the knee (54.8%), the small saphenous vein (30.7%), and the anterior accessory GSV (14.4%). The frequency of single, double, and triple axial vein reflux identified 1.45 vessels eligible for ablation treatment per limb. In group M, the dominant patterns involved the GSV above the knee (61.7%), the small saphenous vein (26.2%), and the anterior accessory GSV (12.1%), for 1.52 axial segments per limb. Of the 84.4% of venous ulcer patients, duplex ultrasound analysis revealed that 97% of this large subset had had surgically correctable disease. ConclusionsThe American Vein & Lymphatic Society Patient Reported Outcome Venous Registry demonstrated that 85% of the leg wounds in the present study were venous in origin and 97% possessed surgically correctable disease. Our findings support early referral to dedicated vein centers with appropriate venous reflux management as a part of the multidisciplinary team caring for patients with venous leg ulcers.

Historical view onto the contribution of phlebodynamometry to the knowledge of venous hemodynamics in the lower extremity

Contribution of phlebodynamometry to the knowledge of the venous hemodynamics in the lower extremity is assessed from the historical point of view. Höjensgard, Stürup, and Arnoldi yielded in the 50's and 60's of the last century substantial information concerning changes of venous pressure in superficial and deep veins of the lower extremity arising during calf pump activity. They confirmed the previous finding that the venous pressure in the quiet standing position corresponds to the column of blood extending from the point of measurement to the heart. During calf pump activity, the systolic-diastolic amplitudes in lower leg veins are very marked; in contrast to that, they are only modest in the popliteal vein. The mentioned authors documented marked decrease in pressure in the posterior tibial vein as well as in the great saphenous vein arising during calf pump activity in healthy people. Contrary to that, the pressure in the popliteal vein did not decrease; it kept principally the value of the resting hydrostatic pressure. This difference of pressure between the thigh veins and the lower leg veins has been called ambulatory pressure gradient; its value in the examined patient cohort was 37.4±6.4 mm Hg. Ambulatory pressure gradient constitutes the suction force that triggers reflux in incompetent superficial and deep veins; this refluxing flow causes ambulatory venous hypertension. Simultaneous pressure recordings in the posterior tibial vein and great saphenous vein in healthy volunteers documented that the systolic and diastolic pressure amplitudes were similar in both veins. The systolic pressure in the posterior tibial vein increased on average by 75 mm Hg; this generates a strong impulse propelling the venous blood mainly into the popliteal vein, and partially into the great saphenous vein. Thus, there is a double-barreled outflow of venous blood from the lower extremity toward the heart. The steep increase in systolic pressure in the great saphenous vein gave evidence of the incompetence of the calf perforators system in healthy people. At present, plethysmography is able to yield similar information on the hemodynamic status of the lower limbs like phlebodynamometry.

A Bibliometric Overview on Endovenous Laser Ablation Research

In managing saphenous vein reflux, endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) has emerged as a trendy minimally invasive substitute in recent years. The development of this field benefits from a thorough understanding of its state of development, and bibliometric analysis may help this. However, no bibliometric analysis has adequately summed up this field. In this study, we sought to analyze decades' worth of EVLA literature. The present study aimed to retrieve information from journals listed in the Web of Science (WoS) search engine with the dataset "TI= (EVLA) or TI= (Endovenous Laser Ablation)." We searched the WoS core collection. There were 471 publications (70.701% articles). They were cited 8062 times totally and 17.12 times per article. The mean Hirsch (H) index of the published documents was 49. Over the past 20 years, there has been a gradual rise in the number of publications and citations in EVLA research, suggesting that the field has gained attention. The United States of America (USA) (n=99), England (n=48), Netherlands (n=48), Türkiye (n=46), and Germany (n=40) were the top five publishing countries on EVLA research. The findings showed that the number of published documents was limited. The contribution was only from 46 countries. The number of publications and the number of broadcasting countries should be increased.

Chronic Venous Disease of the Lower Extremities: A State-of-the Art Review.

Chronic venous disease is a common disease, the prevalence of which increases with age, and can cause debilitating symptoms that adversely affect the quality of life. The risk factors include family history, female sex, obesity, pregnancy, parity, and history of deep vein thrombosis. Moreover, it is associated with venous obstruction, reflux, or both, which, in turn, leads to ambulatory venous hypertension. Chronic venous disease is the leading cause of leg ulcers, which place a significant cost burden on the health care system. Compression therapy remains the cornerstone of treatment, particularly for more advanced disease. Superficial saphenous vein reflux can be associated with significant symptoms. Catheter techniques, both thermal and nonthermal, have demonstrated efficacy and safety in successful closure and symptom improvement. Deep vein obstruction can be broadly divided into thrombotic and nonthrombotic and can lead to symptomatic chronic venous disease. Recanalization using balloons and stents has been increasingly used and studied in such patients. It is critical to develop training opportunities and guidelines to improve evidence-based and appropriate care for cardiologists treating chronic venous disease.

Patterns of Saphenous Vein Reflux and Treatment Plan

Patterns of Saphenous Vein Reflux and Treatment Plan

Correlation between reflux time and venous clinical severity score in patients undergoing saphenous vein ablation: A prospective study

It is unclear whether reflux time independently correlates with severity of symptoms in patients with great saphenous vein reflux. Eighty patients (mean age 64+/-12.7years, 56% female) undergoing great saphenous vein (GSV) ablation for symptomatic reflux were assessed prospectively. Fifty-seven underwent ablation with radiofrequency, 23 with cyanoacrylate adhesive. Venous clinical severity score (VCSS) was assessed at, or prior to the time of ablation. The highest reflux time in the GSV was selected. VCSS values ranged from 2 to 20 (median 7). Mean reflux time was 5.3 s (+/-3.3). The Spearman rank correlation yielded a value of rs = -0.123, p (2-tailed) = .279, which was not significant. The patients with concomitant deep vein reflux had higher VCSS (p < .05). Analysis of patients with only superficial vein reflux (n = 45) also demonstrated a poor correlation between VCSS and reflux time (rs = -0.051, p (2-tailed) = .741). This prospective study did not demonstrate a correlation between reflux time and VCSS.