Vectors For Cancer Gene Therapy Research Articles

Chimeric PSA enhancers exhibit augmented activity in prostate cancer gene therapy vectors.

The native PSA enhancer and promoter confer prostate-specific expression when inserted into adenovirus vectors capable of efficient in vivo gene delivery, although the transcriptional activity is low. By exploiting properties of the natural PSA control regions, we have improved the activity and specificity of the prostate-specific PSA enhancer for gene therapy and imaging applications. Previous studies have established that androgen receptor (AR) molecules bind cooperatively to AREs in the PSA enhancer core (-4326 to -3935) and act synergistically with AR bound to the proximal promoter to regulate transcriptional output. To exploit the synergistic nature of AR action we generated chimeric enhancer constructs by (1) insertion of four tandem copies of the proximal AREI element; (2) duplication of enhancer core; or (3) removal of intervening sequences (-3744 to -2855) between the enhancer and promoter. By comparing to the baseline construct, PSE, containing the PSA enhancer (-5322 to -2855) fused to the proximal promoter (-541 to +12), the three most efficacious chimeric constructs, PSE-BA (insertion of ARE4), PSE-BC (duplication of core) and PSE-BAC (insertion of core and ARE4), are 7.3-, 18.9-, and 9.4-fold higher, respectively. These chimeric PSA enhancer constructs are highly androgen inducible and retain a high degree of tissue discriminatory capability. Initial biochemical studies reveal that the augmented activity of the chimeric constructs in vivo correlates with their ability to recruit AR and critical co-activators in vitro. The enhanced activity, inducibility and specificity of the chimeric constructs are retained in an adenoviral vector (Ad-PSE-BC-luc). Systemic administration of Ad-PSE-BC-luc into SCID mice harboring the LAPC-9 human prostate cancer xenografts shows that this prostate specific vector retained tissue discriminatory capability compared with a comparable cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter driven vector.

Selective gene delivery toward gastric and esophageal adenocarcinoma cells via EpCAM-targeted adenoviral vectors.

Application of recombinant adenoviral vectors for cancer gene therapy is currently limited due to lack of specificity for tumor cells. For gastric and esophageal adenocarcinoma, we present here that the relative abundant expression of the primary adenovirus receptor, coxsackie/adenovirus receptor (CAR), on normal epithelium compared to carcinoma favors the transduction of the epithelium. As such, to achieve specific transduction of cancer cells, targeting approaches are required that ablate the binding of the virus to CAR and redirect the virus to tumor-specific receptors. By immunohistochemistry and reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction assays, we demonstrate a marked difference in expression of the human epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) between normal and (pre)malignant lesions of the stomach and esophagus. Based on this, we explored the feasibility of using EpCAM to achieve gastric and esophageal adenocarcinoma selective gene transfer. Adenoviral vectors redirected to EpCAM using bispecific antibodies against the adenovirus fiber-knob protein and EpCAM specifically infected gastric and esophageal cancer cell lines. Using primary human cells, an improved ratio of tumor transduction over normal epithelium transduction was accomplished by the EpCAM-targeted vectors. This study thus indicates that EpCAM-targeted adenoviral vectors may be useful for gastric and esophageal cancer-specific gene therapy in patients.

Tissue-specific, tumor-selective, replication-competent adenovirus vector for cancer gene therapy.

We have previously described two replication-competent adenovirus vectors, named KD1 and KD3, for potential use in cancer gene therapy. KD1 and KD3 have two small deletions in the E1A gene that restrict efficient replication of these vectors to human cancer cell lines. These vectors also have increased capacity to lyse cells and spread from cell to cell because they overexpress the adenovirus death protein, an adenovirus protein required for efficient cell lysis and release of adenovirus from the cell. We now describe a new vector, named KD1-SPB, which is the KD1 vector with the E4 promoter replaced by the promoter for surfactant protein B (SPB). SPB promoter activity is restricted in the adult to type II alveolar epithelial cells and bronchial epithelial cells. Because KD1-SPB has the E1A mutations, it should replicate within and destroy only alveolar and bronchial cancer cells. We show that KD1-SPB replicates, lyses cells, and spreads from cell to cell as well as does KD1 in H441 cells, a human cancer cell line where the SPB promoter is active. KD1-SPB replicates, lyses cells, and spreads only poorly in Hep3B liver cancer cells. Replication was determined by expression of the E4ORF3 protein, viral DNA accumulation, fiber synthesis, and virus yield. Cell lysis and vector spread were measured by lactate dehydrogenase release and a "vector spread" assay. In addition to Hep3B cells, KD1-SPB also did not express E4ORF3 in HT29.14S (colon), HeLa (cervix), KB (nasopharynx), or LNCaP (prostate) cancer cell lines, in which the SPB promoter is not expected to be active. Following injection into H441 or Hep3B tumors growing in nude mice, KD1-SPB caused a three- to fourfold suppression of growth of H441 tumors, similar to that seen with KD1. KD1-SPB had only a minimal effect on the growth of Hep3B tumors, whereas KD1 again caused a three- to fourfold suppression. These results establish that the adenovirus E4 promoter can be replaced by a tissue-specific promoter in a replication-competent vector. The vector has three engineered safety features: the tissue-specific promoter, the mutations in E1A that preclude efficient replication in nondividing cells, and a deletion of the E3 genes which shield the virus from attack by the immune system. KD1-SPB may have use in treating human lung cancers in which the SPB promoter is active.

Non-viral vectors in cancer gene therapy: principles and progress.

This review focuses on the use of synthetic (non-viral) delivery systems for cancer gene therapy. Therapeutic strategies such as gene replacement/mutation correction, immune modulation and molecular therapy/'suicide' gene therapy type approaches potentially offer unique and novel ways of fighting cancer, some of which have already shown promise in early clinical trials. However, the specific and efficient delivery of the genetic material to remote tumors/metastases remains a challenge, which is being addressed using a variety of viral and non-viral systems. Each of these disparate systems has distinct advantages and disadvantages, which need to be taken into account when a specific therapeutic gene is being used. The review concentrates on particulate gene delivery systems, which are formed through non-covalent complexation of cationic carrier molecules (e.g. lipids or polymers) and the negatively charged plasmid DNA. Such systems tend to be comparatively less efficient than viral systems, but have the inherent advantage of flexibility and safety. The DNA-carrier complex acts as a protective package, and needs to be inert and stable while in circulation. Once the remote site has been reached the complex needs to efficiently transfect the targeted (tumor) cells. In order to improve overall transfection specificity and efficiency it is necessary to optimize intracellular trafficking of the DNA complex as well as the performance after systemic administration. Common principles and specific advantages or disadvantages of the individual synthetic gene delivery systems are discussed, and their interaction with tumor-specific and generic biological barriers are examined in order to identify potential strategies to overcome them.

Polymer-coated adenovirus permits efficient retargeting and evades neutralising antibodies.

Adenovirus is a widely used vector for cancer gene therapy because of its high infection efficiency and capacity for transgene expression in both dividing and nondividing cells. However, neutralisation of adenovirus by pre-existing antibodies can lead to inefficient delivery, and the wide tissue distribution of the coxsackie and adenovirus receptor (CAR, the primary receptor for adenovirus type 5) precludes target selectivity. These limitations have largely restricted therapeutic use of adenovirus to local or direct administration. A successful viral gene therapy vector would be protected from neutralising antibodies and exhibit a preferential tropism for target cells. We report here the development of a covalent coating and retargeting strategy using a multivalent hydrophilic polymer based on poly-[N-(2-hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide] (pHPMA). Incorporation of targeting ligands such as basic fibroblast growth factor and vascular endothelial growth factor on to the polymer-coated virus produces ligand-mediated, CAR-independent binding and uptake into cells bearing appropriate receptors. Retargeted virus is resistant to antibody neutralisation and can infect receptor-positive target cells selectively in mixed culture, and also in xenografts in vivo. Multivalent polymeric modification of adenovirus is an effective way of changing its tropism and interaction with the immune system. As a non-genetic one-step process, the technology is simple, versatile and should yield vectors with an improved safety profile.

52 oral The development of a novel Epstein Barr-virus targeted adenoviral vector for cancer gene therapy

52 oral The development of a novel Epstein Barr-virus targeted adenoviral vector for cancer gene therapy

A lentiviral vector expressing a fusogenic glycoprotein for cancer gene therapy.

The gibbon ape leukaemia virus envelope fusogenic membrane glycoprotein (GALV FMG) is a highly potent cytotoxic gene with great potential for use in cancer gene therapy. Here, we show that production of a VSV-G pseudotyped lentiviral vector expressing GALV FMG reconciles the requirements of viral production with the cytotoxic effects of GALV in human cells and has high titres on both dividing and quiescent tumour cells. Direct intratumoral injection of these stocks eradicated progressively growing human tumour xenografts. The potent bystander effect of the FMG transgene is a major contributor to the success of this approach but immunological activation may also be a factor. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration in vivo of the potential both of FMG and lentiviral vectors for cancer gene therapy and highlights the importance of exploring different vector systems to complement the biological properties of the therapeutic transgene.

Improved safety through tamoxifen-regulated induction of cytotoxic genes delivered by Ad vectors for cancer gene therapy.

The transfer of pro-apoptotic genes to tumors is one of the most promising strategies for anticancer gene therapy. However, the use of potentially toxic genes, such as tumor suppressor genes or apoptotic genes, needs controllable transgene activation. To achieve regulation of the transgene at a desired time, we developed an adenovirus (Ad) vector, in which the apoptotic activity of the target gene has been made 4-OHT-dependent by fusion to the ligand binding-domain of the estrogen receptor (ER). For evaluation of the system in human tumor cells, we used the E2F1 gene which encodes a transcription factor that triggers massive apoptosis in several human cancers. AdER-E2F1 expressed high levels of transgene over at least 1 week. Upon activation of E2F1 by the ligand 4-hydroxy-tamoxifen (4-OHT) the ER-E2F1 fusion protein correctly translocated from the cytosol to the nucleus, transactivated E2F-dependent promoters, and rapidly induced substantial E2F1-related toxicity. Finally, experiments in nude mice showed tightly regulated tumor growth suppression in vivo. Taken together, our system represents a powerful approach for tight regulation and rapid induction of cytotoxicity as the major criteria for safe gene delivery.

Replicative adenoviruses for cancer therapy.

Rapid advances are being made in the engineering of replication-competent viruses to treat cancer. Adenovirus is a mildly pathogenic human virus that propagates prolifically in epithelial cells, the origin of most human cancers. While virologists have revealed many details about its molecular interactions with the cell, applied scientists have developed powerful technologies to genetically modify or regulate every viral protein. In tandem, the limited success of nonreplicative adenoviral vectors in cancer gene therapy has brought the old concept of adenovirus oncolysis back into the spotlight. Major efforts have been directed toward achieving selective replication by the deletion of viral functions dispensable in tumor cells or by the regulation of viral genes with tumor-specific promoters. However, the predicted replication selectivity has not been realized because of incomplete knowledge of the complex virus-cell interactions and the leakiness of cellular promoters in the viral genome. Capsid modifications are being developed to achieve tumor targeting and enhance infectivity. Cellular and viral functions that confer greater oncolytic potency are also being elucidated. Ultimately, the interplay of the virus with the immune system will likely dictate the success of this approach as a cancer therapy.

Development of synthetic promoters for radiation-mediated gene therapy.

Exposure of cells to ionising radiation results in the activation of specific transcriptional control (CArG) elements within the early growth response 1 (Egr1) gene promoter, leading to increased gene expression. As part of a study investigating the potential use of these elements in radiation-controlled gene therapy vectors, we have incorporated their sequences into a synthetic gene promoter and assayed for the ability to induce expression of a downstream reporter gene following irradiation. In vector-transfected MCF-7 breast adenocarcinoma cells, the synthetic promoter was more effective than the wild-type Egr1 counterpart in up-regulating expression of the reporter gene after exposure to a single 5 Gy dose, and equally effective as the wild-type in U87-MG glioma cells. The level of gene expression achieved using the synthetic promoter was dependent on the inducing radiation dose for both U87-MG and MCF-7 cells, being maximal at 3 Gy and decreasing at 5 and 10 Gy. Furthermore, induction could be repeated by additional radiation treatments. The latter indicates that up-regulation should be additive during fractionated radiotherapy schedules. To demonstrate the potential clinical benefit of such an approach, the synthetic promoters were also shown to drive expression of the herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase gene, leading to enhanced cell killing in the presence of the prodrug ganciclovir (GCV) when compared with cells treated with radiation alone. Our results demonstrate that the synthetic promoter is responsive to low doses of ionising radiation and therefore isolated CArG elements function as radiation-mediated transcriptional enhancers outside their normal sequence context. The continued development and optimisation of such radiation-responsive synthetic promoters is expected to make a valuable contribution to the development of future radiation-responsive vectors for cancer gene therapy.

Bifidobacterium longum as a delivery system for cancer gene therapy: selective localization and growth in hypoxic tumors.

A fundamental obstacle in gene therapy for cancer is the specific delivery of an anticancer gene product to a solid tumor, and yet no systemic delivery system that specifically targets solid tumors currently exists. A strain of domestic bacteria, Bifidobacterium longum, which is nonpathogenic and anaerobic, selectively localized and proliferated in several types of mouse solid tumors after systemic application. In this report, we further describe a novel approach to cancer gene therapy in which genetically engineered Bifidobacterium is used as a tumor-specific vector. Similarly to wild-type B. longum, genetically engineered B. longum could be detected in tumor tissue only and was not found in a large survey of normal mouse tissues after intravenous injection. This finding strongly suggests that obligate anaerobic bacteria such as Bifidobacterium can be used as highly specific gene delivery vectors for cancer gene therapy.

The development of a novel Epstein Barr-Virus targeted adenoviral vector for cancer gene therapy

The development of a novel Epstein Barr-Virus targeted adenoviral vector for cancer gene therapy

Vaccinia virus-mediated expression of wild-type p53 suppresses glioma cell growth and induces apoptosis.

The use of vaccinia virus vectors for cancer gene therapy may become a powerful method to achieve efficient anti-tumor effects. We used recombinant vaccinia virus expressing wild-type p53 (rVV-p53) to examine the biological effects of exogenous tumor suppressor p53 in human (U-373MG, U-87MG, LN-Z308) and rat glioma cells (9L, C6) in vitro. All glioma cell lines infected with rVV-p53 exhibited growth inhibition and underwent apoptosis as demonstrated by morphological studies using nuclear staining and flow cytometry. The key role of p53 in cell growth inhibition was confirmed as measured by colony forming efficiency. Growth inhibition and apoptosis were independent of the endogenous p53 status of the glioma cell lines.

Influence of p53 on herpes simplex virus type 1 vectors for cancer gene therapy

Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV 1) vectors are under investigation for use in gene therapy for colorectal cancer liver metastases. Approximately 60% of colorectal cancers possess p53 mutations, and p53 mutations can cause tumor cell resistance to radiation therapy and chemotherapy. p53 is also known to colocalize with at least one HSV 1 protein and influence HSV 1 gene expression. The purpose of this study was to determine if the loss or mutation of p53 in tumor cells alters the cytotoxicity of HSV 1 vectors. HSV 1 vector-mediated in vitro cytotoxicity assays were performed using stable transfectants of SAOS-2-LM2 cells and WiDr cells that express no p53, wild-type p53, mutant p53, or both wild-type p53 and mutant p53. All stable transfectants were equally susceptible to HSV 1 vector cytotoxicity, and cell lines with mutant p53 were not resistant to HSV 1 vectors. These results provide additional rationale for the application of HSV 1 vector gene therapy for colorectal cancer.

Viral and nonviral gene delivery vectors for cancer gene therapy.

The development of vectors that are capable of efficient gene delivery is crucial to the success of gene therapy. We have developed both recombinant viral and nonviral vectors with the goal of correcting genetic abnormalities in cancer cells that are responsible for malignant transformation. Infection of cancer cells by recombinant adenovirus (Adv) indicates that the level of transduction is variable and dependent on the virus-to-cell ratio. Infection of cells with Adv/p53 resulted in levels of tumor suppressor p53 gene expression that could mediate tumor cell growth suppression and apoptosis, both in vitro and in vivo. The treatment of cancer cells with cisplatin prior to Adv transduction resulted in a higher level of therapeutic gene expression. Epidermal growth factor (EGF)/DNA complexes targeted to cancer cells overexpressing the EGF receptor resulted in efficient transduction of several lung cancer cell lines in vitro. As a result, these vectors provide improved methods with which to treat cancer in the clinical setting with gene therapy.

Vaccinia Virus for Human Gene Therapy

Recombinant vaccinia virus may be an ideal viral vector for cancer gene therapy. It has a large genome that is able to be engineered for the insertion and simultaneous expression of multiple genes. It reliably infects a large variety of tumors and expresses high levels of the gene(s) of interest. Although naturally cytopathic, it can be engineered to be noncytopathic but still infectious. Recently, it has been used in preclinical trials of animals and patients with cancer.

Targeted adenoviral vectors for cancer gene therapy.

The delineation of the molecular basis of cancer allows for the possibility of specific intervention at the molecular level for therapeutic purposes. To this end, viral and nonviral vectors have been designed for delivery and expression of genes into target malignant and non-malignant cells. Gene transfer by available vectors, applied both in the ex vivo and in in vivo contexts, has resulted frequently in the desired cellular phenotypical changes. In this regard, recombinant adenoviruses have been particularly efficient for in vivo gene transfer. Importantly, numerous human clinical protocols using adenoviruses have rapidly entered Phase I clinical trials. However, major vector-related problems remain to be solved before the transfer of therapeutic genes by adenoviruses can become an effective and common place strategy for cancer. An overriding obstacle is the basic ability to deliver therapeutic genes specifically into tumor cells. Here we review a diverse number of advances in adenoviral vectors being developed for overcoming this obstacle. As vector technology fulfills these requirements for obtaining the "targetable-injectable" vector, it is anticipated that promising results already observed in pre-clinical studies will translate quickly into the clinic.

Targeted adenoviral vectors for cancer gene therapy (Review)

In order to realise the full potential of gene therapy as a rational approach to the treatment of cancer, it will be necessary to achieve delivery of the therapeutic gene selectively to target tumour cells. Such cancer cell-specific gene delivery is mandated in the context of locoregional or compartmentalised carcinomas, and is also an absolute requirement for the treatment of disseminated disease. Moreover, underlying any cancer gene therapy approach is the need to achieve a high level of efficiency of gene transfer to the target cells. Of the existing viral and nonviral gene delivery vehicles, the adenoviral vector uniquely fulfils two requirements of an intravenously administered vector for cancer gene therapy: systemic stability and the ability to accomplish efficient transduction of cancer cells. However, it is necessary to modify native adenoviral tropism in order to achieve selective transduction of target tumour cells. A number of strategies have been developed for this purpose, involving genetic or immunological modifications to either of two adenoviral capsid proteins, the fibre and penton base. These strategies are designed to generate a targetable, injectable vector which would represent a major advance in the field of cancer gene therapy.

Gene therapy of cancer

Gene therapy of cancer

Vectors for cancer gene therapy.

Many viral and non-viral vector systems have now been developed for gene therapy applications. In this article, the pros and cons of these vector systems are discussed in relation to the different cancer gene therapy strategies. The protocols used in cancer gene therapy can be broadly divided into six categories including gene transfer to explanted cells for use as cell-based cancer vaccines; gene transfer to a small number of tumour cells in situ to achieve a vaccine effect; gene transfer to vascular endothelial cells (VECs) lining the blood vessels of the tumour to interfere with tumour angiogenesis; gene transfer to T lymphocytes to enhance their antitumour effector capability; gene transfer to haemopoietic stem cells (HSCs) to enhance their resistance to cytotoxic drugs and gene transfer to a large number of tumour cells in situ to achieve nonimmune tumour reduction with or without bystander effect. Each of the six strategies makes unique demands on the vector system and these are discussed with reference to currently available vectors. Aspects of vector biology that are in need of further development are discussed in some detail. The final section points to the potential use of replicating viruses as delivery vehicles for efficient in vivo gene transfer to disseminated cancers.