With the emergence of the first organized societies and state formations, construction activity was inextricably linked with the methods of material realization. Even when there were no separate professions of civil engineer and architect, quite complex structures were erected, the construction of arches and vaults allowed to cover huge spaces. Professional skills in the field of construction developed in the process of building associations, so architecture and the beginnings of civil engineering intertwined into a single conglomeration of empirical knowledge passed from teachers to students and consolidated directly in the constructed facilities. The strength of the structure was achieved through the balancing of the structural system and proven in practice methods of load distribution. Construction techniques passed from one era to another, taking into account differences in cultures and worldviews. Each historical culture developed its own style, which reflected the peculiarities of its worldview. The ideological and symbolic content of architecture in those days, of course, dominated the means of functional organization and design solutions. Subsequently, architecture and civil engineering became separate disciplines, which were supplemented by additional ones. Initially, architectural education was provided within art academies, but with the advent of the first educational institutions that graduated civil engineers, it began to be provided there. At the turn of the XIX - XX centuries, the rationalist approach to architecture became increasingly popular. When the final distinction between engineering and architectural training in universities took place, a number of both positive and negative consequences of this phenomenon emerged. Currently, the dominance of construction technology and the widespread introduction of standard architectural solutions have led to the idea that architects can be replaced by developers who need to complete any accelerated courses. To correct the situation at least to some extent, it is necessary to understand that technology exists for the implementation of architectural solutions, and not vice versa.