Vasopressors In Patients Research Articles

Use of Vasopressors in Patients with AKI on Continuous Kidney Replacement Therapy

Use of Vasopressors in Patients with AKI on Continuous Kidney Replacement Therapy

Efficacy and safety of dynamic arterial elastance for weaning vasopressor support in septic shock patients: a randomised controlled trial protocol

IntroductionThe dynamic arterial elastance (EaDyn), calculated as pulse pressure variation divided by stroke volume variation, has been studied as a predictor of vasopressor weaning. However, its potential as a haemodynamic...

The concomitant use of ultra short beta-blockers with vasopressors and inotropes in critically ill patients with septic shock: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BackgroundSeptic shock is associated with systemic inflammatory response, hemodynamic instability, impaired sympathetic control, and the development of multiorgan dysfunction that requires vasopressor or inotropic support. The regulation of immune function in sepsis is complex and varies over time. However, activating Beta-2 receptors and blocking Beta-1 receptors reduces the proinflammatory response by influencing cytokine production. Evidence that supports the concomitant use of ultra short beta-blockers with inotropes and vasopressors in patients with septic shock is still limited. This study aimed to evaluate the use of ultra short beta-blockers and its impact on the ICU related outcomes such as mortality, length of stay, heart rate control, shock resolution, and vasopressors/inotropes requirements. MethodsA systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials including critically ill patients with septic shock who received inotropes and vasopressors. Patients who received either epinephrine or norepinephrine without beta-blockers “control group” were compared to patients who received ultra short beta-blockers concomitantly with either epinephrine or norepinephrine “Intervention group”. MEDLINE and Embase databases were utilized to systematically search for studies investigating the use of ultra short beta-blockers in critically ill patients on either epinephrine or norepinephrine from inception to October 10, 2023. The primary outcome was the 28-day mortality. While, length of stay, heart rate control, and inotropes/ vasopressors requirements were considered secondary outcomes. ResultsAmong 47 potentially relevant studies, nine were included in the analysis. The 28-day mortality risk was lower in patients with septic shock who used ultra short beta-blockers concomitantly with either epinephrine or norepinephrine compared with the control group (RR (95%CI): 0.69 (0.53, 0.89),I2=26%;P=0.24). In addition, heart rate was statistically significantly lower with a standardized mean difference (SMD) of -22.39 (95% CI: -24.71, –20.06) among the beta-blockers group than the control group. The SMD for hospital length of stay and the inotropes requirement were not statistically different between the two groups (SMD (95%CI): -0.57 (-2.77, 1.64), and SMD (95%CI): 0.08 (-0.02, 0.19), respectively). ConclusionThe use of ultra short beta-blockers concomitantly with either epinephrine or norepinephrine in critically ill patients with septic shock was associated with better heart rate control and survival benefits without increment in the inotropes and vasopressors requirement.

Intravenous angiotensin II as an add-on to standard of care vasopressors in patients with refractory shock on mechanical circulatory support: a single centre retrospective case series

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements None. Background Refractory shock is life-threatening condition characterized by hypotension with mean arterial pressure (MAP) less than 65 mmHg and end-organ dysfunction, despite volume resuscitation and high doses of vasopressors. Mortality rates in refractory shock exceeds 90%. Angiotensin II (Ang II) is a non-catecholamine vasopressor that targets the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system by agonism of the angiotensin type 1 receptors. Ang II has been studied in settings of vasodilatory shock, however there is paucity of data regarding the usage of Ang II in patients with preexisting heart failure or in patients requiring mechanical circulatory support (MCS), either short term such as venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) or long term such as left ventricular assist device (LVAD) (1,2). Purpose This report is aimed to analyse baseline characteristics of patients who have received Ang II from the moment it became available in our institution (January 2023). Methods Five patients were included in this retrospective analyses. Demographic, clinical and laboratory parameters as well as hourly changes of vasopressors doses, MAP, lactates, and diuresis were collected and analysed. Results Median age of 5 included patients, 4 of whom were male, was 53 years old (range 18-57). The most common comorbidities were chronic kidney disease (n=3), diabetes mellitus (n=3) and arterial hypertension (n=3), treated with valsartan as chronic therapy. All patients presented with severe shock. 4 patients were on VA-ECMO support, 1 had additionally implanted Impella for left ventricular unloading and 2 had implanted LVAD. All patients had severely reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (median 15%, range 10-25%). In 4 cases vasopressors were initiated due to sepsis and in 1 case during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Median values prior to administration of Ang II were as following: MAP 51 mmHg (range 41-56 mmHg), lactates 6.7 mmol/L (range 2.4-10.7 mmol/L) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score 9 (range 5-11). Four hours following administration of Ang II median MAP was 61 mmHg (range 54-77 mmHg). Patient who ultimately survived had better response to Ang II, with median rise of MAP of 22 mmHg (range 12-22 mmHg). In contrast, patients who ultimately died didn’t respond to Ang II, with rise of MAP of only 2.5 mmHg. Median duration of Ang II administration was 52 h (range 20-96 h). 60% of patients are alive up to the present day. Complete patient data are shown in Table 1. Hourly changes of vasopressor doses and MAP are shown in Figure 1. Conclusion Ang II is an effective vasopressor with rapid effect. This case series suggests that it may be considered as salvage treatment option in patients on MCS with refractory shock. Patients who responded to Ang II had better survival, similar to previous findings. Therefore, Ang II should be considered in earlier phases of shock when maximum doses of vasopressors have not yet been reached.

Does Point-of-Care Ultrasound Affect Fluid Resuscitation Volume in Patients with Septic Shock: A Retrospective Review.

Fixed, large volume resuscitation with intravenous fluids (IVFs) in septic shock can cause inadvertent hypervolemia, increased medical interventions, and death when unguided by point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS). The primary study objective was to evaluate whether total IVF volume differs for emergency department (ED) septic shock patients receiving POCUS versus no POCUS. We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study from 7/1/2018 to 8/31/2021 of atraumatic adult ED patients with septic shock. We agreed upon a priori variables and defined septic shock as lactate ≥4 and hypotension (SBP <90 or MAP <65). A sample size of 300 patients would provide 85% power to detect an IVF difference of 500 milliliters between POCUS and non-POCUS cohorts. Data are reported as frequencies, median (IQR), and associations from bivariate logistic models. 304 patients met criteria and 26% (78/304) underwent POCUS. Cardiac POCUS demonstrated reduced ejection fraction in 15.4% of patients. Lung ultrasound showed normal findings in 53% of patients. The POCUS vs. non-POCUS cohorts had statistically significant differences for the following variables: higher median lactate (6.7 [IQR 5.2-8.7] vs. 5.6], p = 0.003), lower systolic blood pressure (77.5 [IQR 61-86] vs. 85.0, p < 0.001), more vasopressor use (51% vs. 34%, p = 0.006), and more positive pressure ventilation (38% vs. 24%, p = 0.017). However, there were no statistically significant differences between POCUS and non-POCUS cohorts in total IVF volume ml/kg (33.02 vs. 32.1, p = 0.47), new oxygen requirement (68% vs. 59%, p = 0.16), ED death (3% vs. 4%, p = 0.15), or hospital death (31% vs. 27%, p = 0.48). There were similar distributions of lactate, total fluids, and vasopressors in patients with CHF and severe renal failure. Among ED patients with septic shock, POCUS was more likely to be used in sicker patients. Patients who had POCUS were given similar volume of crystalloids although these patients were more critically ill. There were no differences in new oxygen requirement or mortality in the POCUS group compared to the non-POCUS group.

Prognostic role of urinary ketone body in patients with sepsis-associated encephalopathy without hepatic failure: a retrospective cohort study.

Sepsis-associated encephalopathy (SAE) is defined as a dysfunction of the central nervous system experienced during sepsis with variable clinical features. The study aims to identify the prognostic role of urinary ketone bodies in relation to clinical outcomes in patients with SAE. The Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III (MIMIC-III) database was used to conduct a retrospective cohort study. We recruited 427 patients with SAE admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) from the MIMIC-III database. Patients with SAE were divided into a survival group (380 patients) and a non-survival group (47 patients). We used the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and the multivariate logistic regression analysis to analyze the relationship between the level of urinary ketone bodies and the clinical prognosis in patients with SAE. The primary outcome was the relationship between urinary ketone body levels and 28-day mortality of SAE. The secondary outcomes were the relationship between urinary ketone body levels and length of ICU stays, Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), Glasgow Coma Scale, mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy, and the use of vasopressors. The 28-day mortality of patients with SAE was 11.0%. Urinary ketone body levels were not significantly associated with the 28-day mortality of patients with SAE. Urinary ketone body levels were associated with SOFA score and the use of vasopressors in patients with SAE. The SOFA score was an independent risk factor for the 28-day mortality in patients with SAE. Urinary ketone body levels were significantly associated with SOFA score and the use of vasopressors in patients with SAE. Furthermore, the SOFA score can predict the prognosis of short-term outcomes of patients with SAE. Therefore, we should closely monitor the changes of urinary ketone bodies and SOFA score and intervene in time.

Study on Ward-Based Practice of Vasopressor Administration for Patients with Sepsis, in National Hospital of Sri Lanka (NHSL)

Background: Vasopressors are administrated peripherally in hemodynamically unstable patients with sepsis in the initial period. International guidelines are available for peripheral administration of vasopressors, including Surviving Sepsis guidelines 2021.Objective: Assess the ward-based practice regarding peripheral administration of vasopressors in patients with sepsis, in NHSL.Methods: A prospective cross-sectional study, during a period of six weeks in 2022, setting of Medical and surgical wards in NHSL, in a group of 52 patients.Results: Noradrenaline was the vasopressor used for all patients with septic shock. 93% of patients had peripheral noradrenaline infusions for a medium duration of 77.7 hours. Peripheral cannula for noradrenaline was sited in the forearm at 46% and in the dorsum of the hand at 34%. Only 7% had a central line for vasopressors. Other infusions along with noradrenaline in the same cannula were given in 75%. Approximately 90% were monitored hourly during the infusion of vasopressors. ICU referral was done only in 5.7% of patients. Adverse reactions were noted in 38% of patients, all minor complications.Conclusion: Peripheral administration of vasopressors was prolonged compared to standard. Adverse reactions were identified, but all were minor complications.

INITIATION TIMING OF VASOPRESSOR IN PATIENTS WITH SEPTIC SHOCK: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS.

Background: Vasopressor plays a crucial role in septic shock. However, the time for vasopressor initiation remains controversial. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore its initiation timing for septic shock patients. Methods: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Sciences were searched from inception to July 12, 2023, for relevant studies. Primary outcome was short-term mortality. Meta-analysis was performed using Stata 15.0. Results: Twenty-three studies were assessed, including 2 randomized controlled trials and 21 cohort studies. The early group resulted in lower short-term mortality than the late group (OR [95% CI] = 0.775 [0.673 to 0.893], P = 0.000, I2 = 67.8%). The significance existed in the norepinephrine and vasopressin in subgroup analysis. No significant difference was considered in the association between each hour's vasopressor delay and mortality (OR [95% CI] = 1.02 [0.99 to 1.051], P = 0.195, I2 = 57.5%). The early group had an earlier achievement of target MAP ( P < 0.001), shorter vasopressor use duration ( P < 0.001), lower serum lactate level at 24 h ( P = 0.003), lower incidence of kidney injury ( P = 0.001), renal replacement therapy use ( P = 0.022), and longer ventilation-free days to 28 days ( P < 0.001). Conclusions: Early initiation of vasopressor (1-6 h within septic shock onset) would be more beneficial to septic shock patients. The conclusion needs to be further validated by more well-designed randomized controlled trials.

Using of Oral Midodrine in Weaning of Intravenous Vasopressors in Patients with Septic Shock Admitted to ICU

Abstract Background Septic shock is the most severe form of sepsis, in which profound underlying abnormalities in circulatory and cellular/metabolic parameters lead to substantially increased mortality. Diagnosis of septic shock is based on presence of certain symtoms, signs &amp; there is also many Biomarkers which are essential for Diagnosis and Prognosis of Sepsis patients like CRP, Prolactin &amp; BNP. Objective To assess whether the use of adjunctive oral midodrine in patients with vasopressordependent hypotension reduces the time to cessation of intravenous vasopressor. Patients and Methods In order to achieve this aim, we included a total of 140 patients admitted to the ICU unit at Ain Shams University Hospitals who developed septic shock and required IV vasopressors. Patients were divided into 2 groups: Group (A): consists of 70 patients who will receive IV vasopressors only (control group). Group (B): consists of 70 patients who will receive IV vasopressors with adjunctive oral midodrine (midodrine group) or (case group). Results In our study there were no significant differences among patient’s demographics, clinical and hemodynamic parameters suggesting so that the observed results were not secondary to baseline group characteristics. Our results indicate that use of oral midodrine during recovery from septic shock has no effect on the duration and weaning of IV vasopressor infusions. Although the previous parameters were lower in the IV vasopressor with midodrine group compared with the IV vasopressor only group, but the differences weren't significant. The IV vasopressor duration in hours was (139.65 ± 46.21 VS 141.30 ± 79.00) and the IV vasopressor weaning duration in hours was (65.37 ± 13.94 VS 73.20 ± 35.78). These insignificant results may be attributed to the absence of special protocol for vasopressor weaning in the unit, in addition to the obligatory and temporary stoppage of vasopressor weaning when hemodynamic instability occurs (MAP ≤65 mmHg or SBP &amp;lt; 90 mmHg, low urine output &amp;lt; 0.5 ml/kg/h). Our results are inconsistent with most of studies that have demonstrated that midodrine use was associated with a rapid and effective wean from IV vasopressors. Conclusion Use of midodrine doesn't reduce duration of IV vasopressor infusion and weaning during the recovery phase of septic shock. Use of midodrine has no impact on overall survival, length of ICU stay and ICU mortality. Administration of midodrine improved MAP in midodrine group.

Resuscitation goals in septic shock: fluid therapy and vasoactive drugs, an integrative review

Severe sepsis and septic shock are complex syndromes with high mortality that frequently affect ICU patients. Contributions such as the Surviving Sepsis campaign have led to the issuing of guidelines for managing these patients. This manuscript aims to provide a review of state of the art using a systematic review of resuscitation and the use of vasopressors in patients with septic shock. Using MESH terms and Boolean operators, systematic research for information was carried out in PubMed in February 2023. We included 28 articles of which 18 were selected using the prism algorithm that met the inclusion criteria (analysis of septic shock, fluid resuscitation, or the use of vasopressors in septic shock in humans). In conclusion, the management of septic shock should be performed based on clear objectives to improve outcomes, for which maintenance of physiological levels of oxygenation, serum lactate, and mean arterial blood pressure are crucial.

Oral Midodrine as an Adjunct in Rapid Weaning of Intravenous Vasopressor Support in Spinal Cord Injury.

Background Majority of acute cervical spinal cord injury end up requiring long-term stay in intensive care unit (ICU). During the initial few days after spinal cord injury, most patients are hemodynamically unstable requiring intravenous vasopressors. However, many studies have noted that long-term intravenous vasopressors remain the main reason for prolongation of ICU stay. In this series, we report the effect of using oral midodrine in reducing the amount and duration of intravenous vasopressors in patients with acute cervical spinal cord injury. Materials and Methods Five adult patients with cervical spinal cord injury after initial evaluation and surgical stabilization are assessed for the need for intravenous vasopressors. If patients continue to need intravenous vasopressors for more than 24 hours, they were started on oral midodrine. Its effect on weaning of intravenous vasopressors was assessed. Results Patients with systemic and intracranial injury were excluded from the study. Midodrine helped in weaning of intravenous vasopressors in the first 24 to 48 hours and helped in complete weaning of intravenous vasopressors. The rate of reduction was between 0.5 and 2.0 µg/min. Conclusion Oral midodrine does have an effect in reduction of intravenous vasopressors for patients needing prolonged support after cervical spine injury. The real extent of this effect needs to be studied with collaboration of multiple centers dealing with spinal injuries. The approach seems to be a viable alternative to rapidly wean intravenous vasopressors and reduce duration of ICU stay.

Norepinephrine versus phenylephrine for treating hypotension during general anaesthesia in adult patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery: a multicentre, open-label, cluster-randomised, crossover, feasibility, and pilot trial

BackgroundIntraoperative hypotension is associated with postoperative complications. The use of vasopressors is often required to correct hypotension but the best vasopressor is unknown. MethodsA multicentre, cluster-randomised, crossover, feasibility and pilot trial was conducted across five hospitals in California. Phenylephrine (PE) vs norepinephrine (NE) infusion as the first-line vasopressor in patients under general anaesthesia alternated monthly at each hospital for 6 months. The primary endpoint was first-line vasopressor administration compliance of 80% or higher. Secondary endpoints were acute kidney injury (AKI), 30-day mortality, myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery (MINS), hospital length of stay, and rehospitalisation within 30 days. ResultsA total of 3626 patients were enrolled over 6 months; 1809 patients were randomised in the NE group, 1817 in the PE group. Overall, 88.2% received the assigned first-line vasopressor. No drug infiltrations requiring treatment were reported in either group. Patients were median 63 yr old, 50% female, and 58% white. Randomisation in the NE group vs PE group did not reduce readmission within 30 days (adjusted odds ratio=0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.6–1.39), 30-day mortality (1.01; 0.48–2.09), AKI (1.1; 0.92–1.31), or MINS (1.63; 0.84–3.16). ConclusionsA large and diverse population undergoing major surgery under general anaesthesia was successfully enrolled and randomised to receive NE or PE infusion. This pilot and feasibility trial was not powered for adverse postoperative outcomes and a follow-up multicentre effectiveness trial is planned. Clinical trial registrationNCT04789330 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Using the diastolic shock index to determine when to promptly administer vasopressors in patients with septic shock.

Using the diastolic shock index to determine when to promptly administer vasopressors in patients with septic shock.

Alterations of actin cytoskeleton and arterial protein level in patients with obstructive jaundice.

Vascular hypo-responsiveness to vasopressors in patients with obstructive jaundice (OJ) is a common anesthetic event, which leads to perioperative complications and increased mortality. The cause of this clinical issue remains unclear. In this study, we estimated the actin cytoskeleton and arterial protein level in the artery of OJ patients by proteomic analysis. Ten patients with OJ due to bile duct diseases or pancreatic head carcinoma were enrolled, while another ten non-jaundice patients with chronic cholecystitis or liver hemangioma as the control group. Vascular reactivity to noradrenaline was measured before anesthesia on the day of surgery. Artery samples in adjacent tissues of removed tumor were collected and evaluated by 2-dimensional electrophoresis. Proteins with differential expression were detected by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry with immunoblot confirmation. The results confirmed the phenomenon of vascular hypo-reactivity in OJ patients as suppressed aortic response to noradrenaline were existed in these patients. We also found that actin cytoskeleton and several actin-binding proteins were up- or down-regulated in the artery of OJ patients. These proteins changed in OJ patents might be the basic mechanism of vascular hypo-reactivity, further studies to uncover the role of these proteins in OJ is critical for clinical treatment of these patients.

Clinical Update on Vasopressors and Titration Strategies.

Clinical Update on Vasopressors and Titration Strategies.

Hydrocortisone, ascorbic acid, and thiamine (HAT) for sepsis and septic shock: a meta-analysis with sequential trial analysis

BackgroundSepsis is a primary global health threat and costs a lot, requiring effective and affordable treatments. We performed this meta-analysis to explore the treatment of hydrocortisone, ascorbic acid, and thiamine (HAT) in sepsis and septic shock.MethodsWe searched Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to August 14, 2021. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the HAT treatments in sepsis and septic shock. The primary outcome was the change in SOFA score over the 72 h. The second outcomes were the hospital, and 28-/30-day mortality, the duration of vasopressors, PCT clearance, hospital length of stay (LOS), and ICU LOS. We performed a subgroup analysis and a trial sequential analysis (TSA). The Der Simonian–Laird random-effects models were used to report the pooled risk ratios (RR) or mean difference (MD) with confidence intervals (CI).ResultsNine RCTs, enrolling 1427 patients of sepsis and septic shock treated with HAT (717) or only standard care (710), were included. There was a significant difference between the two groups in the change in SOFA score over the first 72 h (MD 0.65, 95% CI 0.30 to 1.00), the duration of vasopressors (MD − 18.16, 95% CI − 25.65 to − 10.68) and the PCT clearance (MD 14.54, 95% CI 0.64 to 28.43). In addition, there was no significant difference in the hospital mortality (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.34), the 28-/30-day mortality (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.15), the hospital LOS (MD 0.78, 95% CI − 0.30 to 1.86), and ICU LOS (MD 0.12, 95% CI − 0.53 to 0.78).ConclusionsThe HAT combination improves the SOFA score in the first 72 h and reduces the duration of vasopressors in patients with sepsis. Given the minor mean difference of the change in SOFA score, the mortality benefit has not been observed.Trial registrationPROSPERO, CRD42020203166.

Effect of Glucose-Insulin-Potassium Infusion on Hemodynamics in Patients with Septic Shock

BACKGROUND: Glucose-insulin-potassium (GIK) demonstrates a cardioprotective effect by providing metabolic support and anti-inflammatory action, and may be useful in septic myocardial depression. AIM: The aim of this study was to assess role of GIK infusion in improving hemodynamics in patients with septic shock in addition to its role in myocardial protection and preventing occurrence of sepsis-induced myocardial dysfunction and sepsis-induced arrhythmias. METHODS: This study was conducted on 75 patients admitted to the Critical Care Department in Cairo University Hospital with the diagnosis of septic shock during the period from January 2019 to December 2019. Patients were divided into two groups; first group was managed according to the last guidelines of surviving sepsis campaign and was subjected to the GIK infusion protocol while second group was managed following the last guidelines of surviving sepsis campaign only without adding GIK infusion. RESULTS: Patients in the GIK group showed better lactate clearance (50% vs. 46.7%) and less time needed for successful weaning of vasopressors than the control group (3.57±1.16 vs. 3.6±1.45 days) thought not reaching statistical significance. There was no statistically significant difference between both groups regarding development of septic-induced cardiomyopathy (16.7% in the control group vs. 13.3% in the GIK group); however, patients with hypodynamic septic shock showed better improvement in hemodynamic profile in the GIK group. Sepsis-induced arrhythmias occurred more in patients of the control group than in patients of the GIK group with no statistically significant difference between both groups (33.3% vs. 20%, p = 0.243). Few side effects were developed as a result of using GIK infusion protocol. CONCLUSIONS: GIK may help in improving hemodynamics and weaning of vasopressors in patients with refractory septic shock and those with septic induced cardiomyopathy. The use of GIK was well tolerated with minimal adverse reactions.

Association of Continuous Intraoperative Vasopressor Use With Reoperation Rates in Head and Neck Free-Flap Reconstruction

Continuous vasopressor use in free-flap reconstruction is a point of contention among microvascular surgeons despite data demonstrating safety. To investigate the association between continuous vasopressor use and the incidence of reoperation in the early postoperative period. In this cohort study, a retrospective medical record review was conducted of patients who underwent head and neck free-flap reconstructions between May 1, 2014, and October 31, 2019, in an academic tertiary care center. All patients undergoing free-flap reconstruction for head and neck defects were included. Continuous intraoperative vasopressors. Patient medical records were queried for demographic variables; intraoperative use of vasopressors; vasopressor type, duration, and infusion rate; reoperation within the first 5 postoperative days; and reason for reoperation. Four hundred forty-nine consecutive free-flap reconstructions were performed on 426 patients. The mean age was 62 years (IQR, 55.7-71.1); 293 patients were men (65.3%), 380 were White (84.6%), 55 were Black (12.2%), and 14 were of other race or ethnicity (3.1%). A total of 174 patients received a continuous vasopressor during their reconstruction. Twenty-three reoperations occurred within 5 days postoperatively, 8 of which included vasopressors during initial intervention. Vasopressor type had no association with reoperation (4.5% vs 5.5% [8/174 vs 15/275, respectively] for patients who received vasopressors vs those who did not) (dobutamine odds ratio [OR], 1.02 [95% CI, 0.21-2.91]; dopamine OR, 1.48 [95% CI, 0.33-4.26]). No difference was seen in the duration (dobutamine OR, 1.50 [95% CI, 0.78-2.90]; dopamine OR, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.59-1.28]) or infusion rate (dobutamine OR, 1.50 [95% CI, 0.99-1.02]; dopamine OR, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.99-1.01]) of vasopressors between patients who underwent reoperation and those who did not. Analysis after the exclusion of reasons for reoperation that did not represent possible microvascular anastomosis failure (eg, Doppler malfunction, donor site complications) showed no increased propensity for reoperation (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.27-3.9). In this cohort study, use of vasopressors for extensive periods intraoperatively during free-tissue transfer appeared to have no association with the rate of reoperation within 5 days of intervention, regardless of agent used, simultaneous use of agents, type of free-flap operation performed, or reason for reoperation. This study adds to the body of literature supporting the judicious use of vasopressors in patients requiring intraoperative pharmacological pressure support during free-flap reconstruction.

Knowledge of and Compliance with Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines among Anesthesiologists: A Nationwide Survey in China.

We aimed to describe anesthesiologists' knowledge of and compliance with the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) guidelines in the perioperative management of patients with sepsis in China. We designed a questionnaire-based, cross-sectional survey. We sent out online questionnaires during 2019 to evaluate whether anesthesiologists in China were familiar with and applied SSC guidelines in perioperative management. We also compared anesthesiologists' knowledge of and compliance with the guidelines among different levels of hospital. In this study, we obtained 971 responses from anesthesiology departments across China. The survey responses showed that 39.0% of anesthesiologists rated their knowledge of the SSC guidelines as being “very familiar” or at least “somewhat familiar.” In total, 68.9% of respondents chose “Initial fluid resuscitation followed by frequent hemodynamic reassessment” as their therapy strategy for patients with septic shock; 62.0% of anesthesiologists chose lactate as a marker of initial resuscitation in clinical practice, and 39.1% thought bundle therapy needed to be started within 1 hour of sepsis diagnosis. A total of 37.1% and 27.1% of respondents chose hydroxyethyl starches and gelatins, respectively, as the preferred fluids for septic shock. As the first choice of vasopressors in patients with sepsis, 727 (74.9%) anesthesiologists chose the correct answer (norepinephrine). Anesthesiologists from tertiary hospitals (class A) had greater familiarity and compliance with the SSC guidelines than those from other hospitals (P < 0.001). In summary, anesthesiologists in China have some knowledge of the SSC guidelines and tend to practice in keeping with these guidelines. However, for some items, anesthesiologists are not up to date with the latest version of the SSC guidelines. The popularity of these guidelines is not homogenous among different levels of hospital. Anesthesiologists must strengthen their knowledge of the SSC guidelines and update their practice in a regular and timely manner, especially in other tertiary and primary hospitals.

Effect of vitamin C in critically ill patients with sepsis and septic shock: A meta-analysis.

The objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy of vitamin C in patients experiencing sepsis and septic shock. The PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about vitamin C treatments for critically ill patients suffering from sepsis and septic shock from inception until December 31, 2019. The primary outcome was mortality, and the secondary outcomes were the ICU length of stay and the dose of vasopressors. A meta-analysis of nine RCTs with a total of 584 patients (301 in the intervention group and 283 in the control group) was conducted. There were significant differences between the vitamin C group and the control group in 28-day mortality (fixed effects OR = 0.60 95% CI [0.42, 0.85], p = 0.004) and in the dose of vasopressors (SMD = -0.88 95% CI [-1.48, -0.29], p = 0.003); however, the ICU length of stay was the same between the two groups (SMD = -0.33 95% CI [-0.87, 0.20] p = 0.23). This meta-analysis demonstrated that the use of vitamin C (compared with placebo) led to a reduction in ICU mortality and a reduction in the dose of vasopressors in patients with septic shock. However, the ICU length of stay was not significantly different between the two groups. Therefore, multicentre and high-quality RCTs are needed to further clarify the safety and effectiveness of vitamin C among patients with sepsis and septic shock.