Sanjiv Kaul, MD, FASE,* James G. Miller, PhD,* Paul A. Grayburn, MD, Shinichi Hashimoto,Mark Hibberd, MD, PhD, Mark R. Holland, PhD, FASE, Helene C. Houle, BA, RDMS, RDCS, RVT, FASE,Allan L. Klein, MD, FASE, Peg Knoll, RDCS, FASE, Roberto M. Lang, MD, FASE,Jonathan R. Lindner, MD, FASE, Marti L. McCulloch, RDCS, FASE, Stephen Metz, PhD,Victor Mor-Avi, PhD, FASE, Alan S. Pearlman, MD, FASE, Patricia A. Pellikka, MD, FASE, Nancy DeMarsPlambeck,BS,RDMS,RDCS,RVT,DavidPrater,MS, ThomasR.Porter,MD,FASE,DavidJ.Sahn,MD,FASE,James D. Thomas, MD, FASE, Kai E. Thomenius, PhD, and Neil J. Weissman, MD, FASEINTRODUCTIONThe leadership at the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE)decided on a proactive role in defining selected areas of researchnecessary in this decade that will meet our future clinical needs.Consequently, ASE sponsored a Technology and ResearchSummit in the fall of 2010 in conjunction with the AmericanHeart Association Scientific Sessions in Chicago. In addition to theASE executive committee, in attendance were the editor, deputyeditor, and one of the associate editors of the Journal of theAmerican Society of Echocardiography. Also invited were physician-scientists active in the field of cardiovascular ultrasound, respectedultrasound physicists, and senior engineers from the various ultra-sound companies.The agenda for the full-day meeting covered a selected range ofsubjects including the assessment of global and regional left ventricu-lar function, regional myocardialperfusion, molecular imaging, thera-peutic ultrasound, and peripheral vascular imaging. Also addressedwere research necessary to determine the broad clinical utility ofhand held ultrasound devices and the impact of future technologicaldevelopments on the field of cardiovascular imaging.Because of time constraints, other important and worthy areas ofresearch were not discussed. There was an hour devoted to the dis-cussion of each subject that was initiated by the chairs and panelistsassigned to each of the topics. The discussion was robust, and at theend, the chairs and panelists for each topic were requested to sub-mit in writing a short synopsis of the discussion. These have beencompiled into a document that we believe will serve as a roadmapfor cardiovascular ultrasound research for this decade. At the endof each section a short list of references for selected reading isprovided.Although we have defined the areas that are ripe for future re-search, we also strongly believe that we havetotrain the future scien-tists who will implement this research agenda. ASE has historicallyawarded one or two fellowship training grants a year and also anaward for researchtraining of a sonographer. At some institutions fel-lowshavealsoreceivedtraininggrantsfromthelocalAmericanHeartAssociation, and very occasionally a training grant (F32) from theNational Institutes of Health. However, this is not enough. We needmore institutional training grants from the National Institutes ofHealth in order to train an adequate number of MD and PhD scien-tists in cardiovascular imaging. To our knowledge there are currentlyonlyahandfulofsuchtraininggrantsinthecountry,whichiswoefullyinadequate. We believe that we need at least 20–25 such traininggrants devoted to the general field of cardiovascular imaging so thatwithin a decade there will be enough physicians trained in scientificmethods and clinical research to address the subjects that havebeen discussed in this report.The field of cardiovascular ultrasound is very broad, ranging fromclinical validation of new technology to studies requiring knowledgeof physics, mathematics, organic chemistry, physiology, pharmacol-ogy, molecular and vascular biology, genetics, clinical trials, and out-come research. Cross-training of individuals in one or more of thesefields is essential for cardiovascular ultrasound to thrive and succeed.Ourhopeisthatthisreportwillencourageyoungpeopletorealizethescope of cardiac ultrasound research and make a career in this dy-namic field.Selected Reading