Vascular Access Team Research Articles

ThTP5.12 Assessment of malnutrition and nutritional interventions in patients presenting with acute small bowel obstruction – are we ‘getting it right first time’?

Abstract Aims High levels of morbidity and mortality are associated with small bowel obstruction (SBO), a common general surgical emergency. Assessment of malnutrition and introduction of early nutritional interventions are of paramount importance in the management algorithm of these patients. We audited our practice of managing acute small bowel obstruction at a busy district general hospital comparing our practice against National Audit of Small Bowel Obstruction (NASBO) recommendations. Methods Data were gathered for all patients presenting with bowel obstruction to our Trust between 01/08/2022 and 30/11/2022. In depth review of patient case records was undertaken using electronic patient record systems (e-Track and Evolve). Results 195 patients were admitted with acute bowel obstruction. 68 patients (35%) had acute SBO (M: F; 34:34). 58 (85%) had no documentation of duration for which they had been ‘nil by mouth’ (NBM) prior to hospitalisation. Malnutrition universal screening tool score (MUST score) was completed in 29 (43%) patients. 59% of patients had an emergency computed tomography (CT) which confirmed diagnosis of SBO. 60% of patients were managed non-operatively. On an average, patients were kept ‘NBM’ for two days (range; 1-16 days). Average waiting time for peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) was 9.6 days. Conclusions Evaluating our practice of managing patients with acute SBO has highlighted multiple areas for improvement to ‘get it right first time’. We have included stakeholders; nursing staff, dieticians, surgeons, junior doctors and vascular access team to implement action plan to optimise management in this cohort of patients in line with NASBO guidelines.

Evaluation of extended-length cannula inserted using ultrasound guidance in patients with difficult IV access.

Historically, gaining peripheral intravenous (IV) access for patients with difficult intravenous access (DIVA) has been problematic and associated with increased complications, central venous access device insertion and reduced patient satisfaction. Consequently, extended-length peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVCs) have been developed, but to date no real-world data exploring their effectiveness with NHS patients has been published. This article reports on the results of introducing extended-length PIVCs, inserted using ultrasound guidance in patients with DIVA by a vascular access team. This began in 2019, across an adult tertiary hospital setting in the NHS with about 750 beds. The specialties at this hospital include, but are not limited to, emergency medicine; head and neck; vascular; diabetes and endocrinology; respiratory; care of the older person; stroke services; gastroenterology; and trauma and orthopaedics. The vascular access team recorded 1485 individual insertions between 2019 to 2022, with a mean dwell time of 6 days, a first attempt success rate of 91%, and a therapy completion rate of 75 and 78% for inpatient and outpatients respectively. Indications included administration of IV fluids, medication, blood products and access for investigations or procedures. Obtaining reliable IV access in patients with DIVA prevents treatment delays, cancelled or delayed procedures, both of which benefit patients and the healthcare organisation. The data presented in this study support the use of extended-length PIVCs in patients with DIVA and has led to the development of new referral pathways.

Clotted blood samples in the neonatal intensive care unit: A retrospective, observational study to evaluate interventions to reduce blood sample clotting.

Blood draws for laboratory investigations are essential for patient management in neonatal intensive care units (NICU). When blood samples clot before analysis, they are rejected, which delays treatment decisions and necessitates repeated sampling. To decrease the incidence of rejected blood samples taken for laboratory investigation as a result of clotted sample. This retrospective observational study used routine data on blood draws from preterm infants collected between January 2017 and June 2019 in a 112-cot NICU in Qatar. Quality improvement interventions to reduce the rate of clotted blood samples included: awareness raising and safe sampling workshops with NICU staff, involvement of the neonatal vascular access team, development of a complete blood count (CBC) sample collection pathway, review of sample collection equipment, introducing the Tenderfoot® heel lance, establishment of benchmarks and provision of dedicated blood extraction equipment. First attempt blood draw occurred in 10 706 cases, representing a 96.2% success rate. In 427 (3.8%) cases, the samples were clotted requiring repeat collection. The overall rate of clotted specimens decreased from 4.8% in 2017 and 2018 to 2.4% in 2019, with odds ratios of 1.42 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13-1.78, p = .002), 1.46 (95% CI 1.17-1.81, p < .001) and 0.49 (95% CI 0.39-0.63, p < .001), respectively. The majority (87%-95%) of blood samples were by venepuncture using an intravenous (IV) catheter or the NeoSafe™ blood sampling device. Heel prick sampling was the second (2%-9%) most common method. Clotted samples were most frequently associated with needle use, 228 of 427 (53%), and IV cannula, 162 of 427 (38%), with odds ratios of 4.14 (95% CI 3.34-5.13, p < .001) and 3.11 (95% CI 2.51-3.86, p < .001), respectively. Our interventions over 3 years were associated with reduced rates of sample rejection due to clotting, and this led to improved patient experience through fewer repeated samplings. The insights gained from this project can help to improve patient care. Interventions that reduce the rate of blood sample rejection by clinical laboratories can lead to economic savings, timelier diagnostic and treatment decisions, and contribute to an improved quality care experience for all critical care patients, irrespective of age, by reducing the need for repeated phlebotomy and the risk of related complications.

379 To Tunnel or Not to Tunnel a Catheter for Kidney Replacement Therapy in the Medical ICU: Role of an Advanced Hemodialysis Vascular Access Team

379 To Tunnel or Not to Tunnel a Catheter for Kidney Replacement Therapy in the Medical ICU: Role of an Advanced Hemodialysis Vascular Access Team

UltraSound guided PEripheral Catheterization increases first-atTempt success RAte in hospitalized patients when compared with conventional technique: SPECTRA - Randomized Clinical Trial.

Peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) insertion is the most common invasive procedure in the hospital setting. Ultrasound guided PIVC insertion in specific populations and settings has shown patient care benefits. To compare the success rate of first attempts of ultrasound guided PIVC insertion performed by nurse specialists with conventional PIVC insertion performed by nurse assistants. Randomized, controlled, single-center clinical trial registered on the ClinicalTrials.gov platform under registration NTC04853264, conducted at a public university hospital from June to September 2021. Adult patients hospitalized in clinical inpatient units with an indication for intravenous therapy compatible with a peripheral venous network were included. Participants in the intervention group (IG) received ultrasound guided PIVC performed by nurse specialists from the vascular access team, while those in the control group (CG) received conventional PIVC by nurse assistants. The study included a total of 166 patients: IG (n = 82) and CG (n = 84), mean age 59.5 ± 16.5 years, mostly women (n = 104, 62.7%) and white (n = 136, 81.9%). Success rate on the first attempt of PIVC insertion in IG was 90.2% and in CG was 35.7% (p < 0.001), with a relative risk of 2.5 (95% CI 1.88-3.40) for success in IG versus CG. Overall assertiveness rate was 100% in IG and 71.4% in CG. Regarding procedure performance time, the medians in IG and CG were 5 (4-7) and 10 (6-27.5) min respectively (p < 0.001). As for the incidence of negative composite outcomes, IG had lower rates compared to CG, 39% versus 66.7% (p < 0.001), generating a 42% lower probability of negative outcomes in IG, 0.58 (95% CI: 0.43-0.80). Successful first-try insertion was higher in the group receiving ultrasound-guided PIVC. Moreover, there were no insertion failures and IG presented lower insertion time rates and incidence of unfavorable outcomes.

Nudging to select single-lumen over multiple-lumen peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) in a large safety net system.

Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are increasingly used for vascular access in inpatient settings. Compared to multilumen PICCs, single-lumen PICCs carry a lower rate of complications, including central-line-associated bloodstream infection and thrombosis. Despite this, multilumen PICCs are still overused. This quality improvement initiative was implemented across 11 hospitals at New York City Health + Hospitals safety net system. The electronic health record (EHR) interventional radiology or vascular access team consultation orders were modified to allow for lumen choice, with default selection to a single-lumen PICC. Average single-lumen PICC utilization increased by 25.5%, from 44.4% to 69.9% (P < .001). CLABSI rates had a nonsignificant reduction by 26.7% from 2.44 to 1.79 infections per month (P = .255). Among provider types in the postintervention period, single-lumen PICC utilization ranged from 67.7% for advanced practice providers to 82.4%-94.6% for physicians. Among provider specialties, utilization ranged from 31.8% for neurology to 97.7% for orthopedics. Additionally, there was large variation in pre- and postintervention differences in utilization by hospital. We successfully increased single-lumen PICC utilization across all 11 safety net hospitals. This expands on previous work on improving single-lumen PICC use and use of default nudges in large, resource-limited settings. Further study is needed to examine variation among provider types, specialties, and hospitals.

Nurses' Perceptions of Infusion Therapy During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, nurses were faced with challenges when caring for patients, safely administering intravenous (IV) medications and solutions, and protecting themselves from the virus. To address these challenges, nurses moved infusion pumps outside of intensive care unit (ICU) rooms of patients with COVID-19 to minimize their exposure to the virus, conserve personal protective equipment, and efficiently administer IV medications and solutions. The purpose of this qualitative descriptive study was to explore and describe nurses' perception of managing infusion pumps outside the ICU rooms of patients with COVID-19 at 6 acute care hospitals. Eight interviews were conducted with ICU nurse managers, assistant nurse managers, clinical nurses, and vascular access team staff. From the interviews, the overarching theme was "figure out a way," with the subtheme "no clear-cut policy." Additional themes were: (1) limiting nurses' exposure, (2) increased risk for infection and error, (3) teamwork, and (4) roller coaster of emotions. The findings from this study revealed that, during this unprecedented pandemic, nurses were innovative and figured out a way to care for patients who were critically ill with COVID-19. Understanding this experience provides insight into creating policies and procedures to guide patient care in future pandemics or emergency care.

Supporting clinical competency in managing peripherally inserted central catheters during the COVID-19 pandemic: an education evaluation

Hospitals had to create new practices and training due to the severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic. An increase in patient acuity and the need for peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) across the hospital required an urban community hospital to educate and support in-patient nurses to manage PICCs in acute and complex care units. Traditionally, these skills were performed by specialized registered nurses (RNs) from the Vascular Access Team (VAT). This paper highlights the education plan, implementation, and evaluation of a hospital-wide training for RNs and registered practical nurses (RPNs) in in-patient units during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Clinical Resource Leaders (CRLs) created a modular approach to upskill existing nurses and train new hires. Various education strategies, such as the use of competency assessments, creating practice supports, and incorporating specialists as a resource, were utilized to ensure knowledge transfer, application, and guidance of evidence-informed clinical practices. Vascular Access Team documentation was utilized to obtain Kirkpatrick's (2021) level 4 evaluation. This training program was implemented after the second wave of the pandemic and was also embedded into nursing orientation. This structured approach ensured that nurses were competent to support the increased acuity and needs of patients. Eighty percent of full-time and part-time nurses were trained to manage PICC lines. Education evaluation results show a decrease in PICC-related VAT assistance requests with a baseline of 570 calls down to 149 six months after education was implemented. Leaders are encouraged to ensure teams have role clarity, policies, and practice supports to be successful.

Safety and Efficacy of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Placement by Surgical Intensivist–Led Vascular Access Team

This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of bedside peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) placement under ultrasonography (USG) guidance in the general ward by a surgical intensivist-led vascular access team versus that of PICC placement in the intensive care unit (ICU) or fluoroscopy unit. We conducted this retrospective study of all patients who underwent PICC placement between March 2021 and May 2022. Clinical, periprocedural, and outcome data were compared for PICC placement in the ICU, general ward, and fluoroscopy unit groups, respectively. A total of 354 PICC placements were made in 301 patients. Among them, USG-guided PICC placement was performed in 103 and 147 cases in the ICU and general ward, respectively, while fluoroscopy-guided PICC placement was performed in 104 cases. USG-guided PICC placement more often required post-procedural catheter repositioning than fluoroscopy-guided PICC placement (P<0.001), but there was no significant difference in any adverse events (P=0.796). In addition, USG-guided PICC placement in the general ward was more efficient than fluoroscopy-guided PICC placement (0.73 days vs. 5.73 days, respectively; P<0.001). In the multivariate analysis, previous PICC placement within 6 months was an independent risk factor for a PICC-associated bloodstream infection (odds ratio, 2.835; 95% confidence interval, 1.143-7.034; P=0.025). USG-guided PICC placement in the general ward by a surgical intensivist-led vascular access team has comparable safety and efficiency to that of USG-guided PICC placement in the ICU or fluoroscopy-guided PICC placement.

2022 Association for Vascular Access Scientific Meeting: Poster Abstracts

2022 Association for Vascular Access Scientific Meeting: Poster Abstracts

Femorally inserted central catheters with exit site at mid-thigh: A low risk alternative for central venous catheterization.

Femorally inserted central catheters are increasingly used, especially after the COVID-19 pandemic, also thanks to widespread of tunneling techniques that allow the exit site to be moved away from the groin. In this retrospective observational study, femorally inserted catheters, with exit site at mid-thigh and the tip in Inferior vena cava or in Inferior vena cava at the junction with right atrium, have been observed and complications have been analyzed. All catheters were inserted by trained Nurses of a tertiary hospital Vascular Access Team. In 142 catheters (126 inserted via common femoral vein and 16 inserted via superficial femoral vein) and 3060 catheter days, we observed an infection rate of 1.3 events/1000 catheter days (all of them in oncologic patients and up to 30 days of catheterization), 2 cases of thrombotic events (1.41%) and 17 cases of accidental removal (11.97%). Other rare complications, as primary malposition, tip migration, arterial pseudoaneurysm, have been recorded. The average length of catheters inserted, from the exit site to the tip, was 47.6 ± 2.4 cm. The attention to the correct position of the tip, the exit site at mid-thigh and the new techniques during insertion make these femoral catheters as safe as other central vascular access devices. For this kind of central access device, a catheter at least 50 cm long is needed.

The case for implementing nurse-led vascular access service teams.

British Journal of NursingVol. 31, No. 19 CommentThe case for implementing nurse-led vascular access service teamsAndrew BartonAndrew Barton(E-mail Address: [email protected])Nurse Consultant IV Therapy and Vascular Access, Frimley Health NHS Foundation Trust, and Chair, NIVASSearch for more papers by this authorAndrew BartonPublished Online:28 Oct 2022https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2022.31.19.S6AboutSectionsView articleView Full TextPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail View article References Barton A; for National Infusion and Vascular Access Society. The benefits of a nursing led vascular access service team: a white paper to outline a standardised structure and approach for the NHS to deliver vascular access services in every hospital, 2022. https://tinyurl.com/NIVAS-whitepaper-2022 (accessed 20 October 2022) Google ScholarCarr PJ, Moureau NL. Specialized vascular access teams. In: Moureau NL (ed). Vessel health and preservation: the right approach for vascular access. Cham, Switzerland: SpringerOpen; 2019 Crossref, Google ScholarGuerrero MA. National evaluation of safety peripheral intravenous catheters in a clinician-led project. Br J Nurs. 2019;28(2):S29-S32. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2019.28.2.S29 Link, Google ScholarHamilton H, O'Byrne M, Nicholai L. Central lines inserted by clinical nurse specialists. Nurs Times. 1995;91(17):38–39 Medline, Google ScholarHarnage S. Seven years of zero central-line-associated bloodstream infections. Br J Nurs. 2012;21(21):S6-S12. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2012.21.Sup21.S6 Link, Google ScholarHelm RE, Klausner JD, Klemperer JD, Flint LM, Huang E. Accepted but unacceptable: peripheral IV catheter failure. J Infus Nurs. 2015;38(3):189-203. https://doi.org/10.1097/NAN.0000000000000100 Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarJackson A, Coop S. Zero central-line infections in a 550-bedded district general hospital. Br J Nurs. 2012;21(14):S24, S26-S28. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2012.21.Sup14.S24 Link, Google ScholarLoon FHJV, Puijn LAPM, Houterman S, Bouwman ARA. Development of the A-DIVA scale: a clinical predictive scale to identify difficult intravenous access in adult patients based on clinical observations. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(16):e3428. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000003428 Crossref, Medline, Google ScholarMoore A. Roundtable: ensuring safe vascular access. HSJ Guides. 2021. https://guides.hsj.co.uk/5921.guide (accessed 20 October 2022) Google Scholar FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails 27 October 2022Volume 31Issue 19ISSN (print): 0966-0461ISSN (online): 2052-2819 Metrics History Published online 28 October 2022 Published in print 27 October 2022 Information© MA Healthcare LimitedPDF download

PEDIATRIC AND MEDICINE RESIDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS OF ULTRASOUND VASCULAR ACCESS AND RESULTS OF AN INTERSPECIALTY, SIMULATION-BASED ULTRASOUND VASCULAR ACCESS WORKSHOP

PEDIATRIC AND MEDICINE RESIDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS OF ULTRASOUND VASCULAR ACCESS AND RESULTS OF AN INTERSPECIALTY, SIMULATION-BASED ULTRASOUND VASCULAR ACCESS WORKSHOP

CLABSI Reduction Strategy: Utilizing Weekly Rounds with an Interdisciplinary Team.

Introduction: Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) in pediatric ICU patients lead to a wide variety of adverse outcomes, including increased mortality and morbidity, longer length of stay in the hospital, and greater healthcare costs.1 Pediatric cardiac ICU patients are at a significantly higher risk for these healthcare-associated infections because of an increase in risk factors, such as congenital anomalies, presence of surgical wounds, compromised immune function post cardiopulmonary bypass, and the presence of multiple invasive medical devices.2 After noting an increase in the pediatric cardiac ICU CLABSI rate, an interdisciplinary team was formed to approach the problem. Objectives: The primary aim was to decrease the pediatric cardiac ICU’s CLABSI rate by 25% in 8 months by engaging an interdisciplinary team with identifying and addressing CLABSI maintenance bundle concerns in real time on the unit. Methods: An interdisciplinary team with representatives from nursing, unit leadership, intensive care physicians, infection prevention, nurse practitioners, vascular access team, and quality improvement utilized initial Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles to develop a rounding tool that identified threats to the CLABSI prevention bundle with patient-specific interventions to consider implementing. Weekly interdisciplinary rounds were then conducted on all central lines. Additional PDSA cycles focused on addressing unit-specific gaps in education and increasing awareness of best practices for central line care and maintenance. These included addition and delineation of space to separate clean and dirty supplies, hygiene supplementations to the care bundle, eRecord handoff updates, and both in-person and online educational offerings. Results: Preliminary data suggested a decrease in CLABSI rate during the initial 4-month intervention period (Fig. 1). The focus on central line care has also led to more consistent and robust observations for bundle compliance. In 2021, zero CLABSIs were noted for the initial 4 months after intervention contributing to a unit record of 243 days CLABSI-free. We would like to call attention to 2 points in Figure 1. Point two represents the initiation of weekly interdisciplinary CLABSI rounds. Point three represents 2 premature infants, atypical for unit census, on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation with hemodialysis catheters that required off-label use of Prismaflex. Conclusions: Engagement of a microsystem’s interdisciplinary team to focus efforts on identifying and addressing real-time concerns to central lines has led to a short-term decrease in CLABSI rate. Sustaining this decrease in CLABSIs will require continual reassessment of the effectiveness of strategies utilized. Additional PDSA interventions as a result of the weekly rounds are being investigated, including the use of antimicrobial sheets for high-risk patients, the creation of unit-specific prepackaged sterile central line dressing kits, and transitioning from alcohol to chlorohexidine scrubs for hub accessing.Fig

Vascular access teams: a global outlook on challenges, benefits, opportunities, and future perspectives

Specialized vascular access training for medical professionals organized into vascular access teams (VATs) was shown to improve patient outcomes, clinical efficiency, and cost savings. Professional perspectives on VAT benefits, organization, challenges, and opportunities on a global scale remain inadequately explored. Using detailed perspectives, in this study, we explored the global VAT landscape, including challenges faced, clinical and clinico-economic impacts of VATs, with emphasis on underresearched facets of VAT initiation, data dissemination, and metrics or benchmarks for VAT success. Semistructured in-depth interviews of 14 VAT professionals from 9 countries and 5 continents were used to elicit qualitative and quantitative information. Catheter insertions (100%) and training (86%) were the most performed VAT functions. Based on a 1-7 scale evaluating observed impacts of VATs, patient satisfaction (6.5) and institutional costs (6.2) were ranked the highest. VAT co-initiatives, advanced technology utilization (6.6), and ongoing member training (6.3) distinctly impacted VAT endeavors. Most institutions (64%) did not have routine mechanisms for recording VAT-related data; however, all participants (100%) stated the importance of sharing data to demonstrate VAT impacts. Time constraints (57%) emerged as one of the major deterrents to data collection or dissemination. The majority (64%) experienced an increased demand or workload for VAT services during the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite the global variances in VATs and gaps in VAT-related data, all participants unanimously endorsed the benefits of VAT programs. Evaluating the impact of VATs, disseminating VAT-related data, and forging specialized institutional partnerships for data sharing and training are potential strategies to tackle the hurdles surrounding VAT formation and sustenance.

Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters Versus Central Venous Catheters for in-Hospital Parenteral Nutrition.

Our objective was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the use of peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICCs) by a vascular access team (VAT) versus central venous catheters (CVCs) for in-hospital total parenteral nutrition (TPN). The study used a cost-effectiveness analysis based on observational data retrospectively obtained from electronic medical records from 2018 to 2019 in a teaching hospital. We included all interventional procedures requiring PICCs or CVCs with the indication of TPN. We recorded the costs of insertion, maintenance, removal, and complications. The main outcome measure was the incidence rate of catheter-associated bacteremia per 1000 catheter days. Cost-effectiveness analysis was performed from the hospital perspective within the context of the publicly funded Spanish health system. Confidence intervals for costs and effectiveness differences were calculated using bootstrap methods. We analyzed 233 CVCs and 292 PICCs from patients receiving TPN. Average duration was longer for PICC (13 versus 9.4 days, P &lt; 0.001). The main reason for complications in both groups was suspected infection (9.77% CVC versus 5.18% PICC). Complication rates due to bacteremia were 2.44% for CVC and 1.15% for PICC. The difference in the incidence of bacteremia per 1000 catheter days was 1.29 (95% confidence interval, -0.89 to 3.90). Overall, costs were lower for PICCs than for CVCs: the difference in mean overall costs was -€559.9 (95% confidence interval, -€919.9 to -€225.4). Uncertainty analysis showed 86.37% of results with lower costs and higher effectiveness for PICC versus CVC. Placement of PICC by VAT compared with CVC for TPN reduces costs and may decrease the rate of bacteremia.

Novel Multidisciplinary Vascular Access Team Helps to Improve ICU Workflow Amidst Covid-19 Pandemic.

The surge in critically ill patients has pressured hospitals to expand their intensive care unit capacities and critical care staff. This was difficult given the country's shortage of intensivists. This paper describes the implementation of a multidisciplinary central line placement team and its impact in reducing the vascular access workload of ICU physicians during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic. Vascular surgeons, interventionalists, and anesthesiologists, were redeployed to the ICU Access team to place central and arterial lines. Nurses with expertise in vascular access were recruited to the team to streamline consultation and assist with line placement. While 51 central and arterial lines were placed per 100 ICU patients in 2019, there were 87 central and arterial lines placed per 100 COVID-19 ICU patients in the sole month of April, 2020. The ICU Access Team placed 107 of the 226 vascular access devices in April 2020, reducing the procedure-related workload of ICU treating teams by 46%. The ICU Access Team was able to complete a large proportion of vascular access insertions without reported complications. Given another mass casualty event, this ICU Access Team could be reassembled to rapidly meet the increased vascular access needs of patients.

Techniques to Improve Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Placement

Techniques to Improve Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Placement

Peripherally inserted central catheters versus non-tunnelled ultrasound-guided central venous catheters in newborns: a retrospective observational study

ObjectivesWe aimed to compare the success rates and other catheter-related parameters between peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) and non-tunnelled ultrasound-guided central venous catheters (USG-CVCs) including femoral, jugular, brachiocephalic and subclavian...

Vascular access unit: Six-years experience report in France.

The role of nurses in peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) placement has been limited in France. Having a fully trained nurse-led PICC team can positively impact nursing profession and make better use of valuable human and economic healthcare resources. It can also improve the standards of patient's care, procedural experience, and safety. The aim of this article is to report the successful outcomes of nurse-led PICC team performed over a 6-year period from a single central hospital in France. The authors reviewed all PICCs insertions performed by their trained nurse led team between 2014 and 2019. All quantitative and qualitative variables were considered: the patients admitted, the type of PICC inserted, overall procedural time, the mentor's help, the insert failures, the number of punctures required, the procedural pain utilizing Visual Analog Scale (VAS), any procedural complications, chest X-rays needed, the follow up to the eighth day (D8). From 2014 to 2019, 12,687 PICC were inserted with 128 failed procedures (1%). In 2019, 73% of procedural insertion time was less than 10 min. The request of support rapidly decreased to 2 calls/month. More than 90% of procedures were associated with mild pain (VAS ⩽ 3). After the first month of training, 81% of all procedures were performed with a single insertion puncture. Accidental artery puncture during procedure was 0.5%. The authors found room for improvement, progressing from 97% in the first year to 99% in 2019. Furthermore, the authors found that only 1.85% of all catheters developed local infection within D8, and only 0.83% evolved in vein thrombosis. Total bloodstream infection was at 0.1%. The authors report successful outcomes from data collected during the 6-year period demonstrating clear benefits of a nurse-led vascular access team with regard to system wide efficiencies and patient satisfaction.