PLASMID DNA-BASED GENE TRANSFER is attractive because it eliminates the need for a biological vector, although it has been handicapped by the lack of efficient and/or effective delivery methods. When compared with viral delivery, the advantages include reduced potential for immunogenicity, integration into the genome, and environmental spread. One method that has emerged as a means to facilitate delivery of plasmid DNA is in vivo electroporation or electropermeabilization. Gene therapy-specific descriptions include gene electroinjection, gene electrotransfer, electrically mediated delivery, or electrogene transfer. For the purpose of this minireview, all these terms are referred to as in vivo EP. In vivo EP has also been used to facilitate transdermal delivery, the use of electric pulses to transport molecules through the skin, but this area of research will not be discussed. Electroporation originated for in vitro transfection (Neumann et al., 1982) and over the past 25 years has become a standard laboratory method. The administration of electric fields under specific pulse conditions increases cell membrane permeability, which allows uptake of molecules through the cell membrane. The initial demonstration of in vivo EP was the delivery of chemotherapeutic agents to solid tumors (Okino et al., 1987). In the midto late 1990s, the effectiveness of this approach for drug delivery was demonstrated in a variety of different tumors in animals and humans (Gothelf et al., 2003). This technique was then tested for enhanced plasmid DNA delivery (Heller et al., 1996; Nishi et al., 1996). In vivo EP is applicable to all tissues tested, the primary issue being accessibility. The use of in vivo EP for plasmid DNA delivery has seen tremendous growth, including the initiation of the first clinical trials. Gene expression level and kinetic patterns after in vivo EP delivery can be varied for different applications by manipulation of the electrode configuration, electrical parameters, and tissue of delivery (Table 1). The versatility of expression is a distinct advantage, and these variables should be carefully selected to match the specific gene transfer application. Therapeutic in vivo EP delivery focuses on a variety of applications such as cancer therapy, regulation of protein levels to enhance or reduce function, or the amelioration of symptoms of iatrogenic or natural disease. Vaccine and preventive gene expression has also been demonstrated. Like other gene delivery methods, enhancement of transgene expression by in vivo EP may also be developed for possible economic rather than therapeutic benefit. Examples include the production of monoclonal antibodies (Perez et al., 2004; Tjelle et al., 2004) or the generation of healthier livestock (Prud’homme et al., 2006). Plasmids or oligonucleotides may also be delivered to explore promoter or gene function. Expression of reporter genes may be used to optimize in vivo EP parameters, to explore the mechanism of EP, or simply to demonstrate delivery in a new tissue. The increased use of in vivo EP for gene delivery has established its potential for many therapeutic applications. Numerous published studies and reviews (Heller, 2003; Andre and Mir, 2004; Heller et al., 2005) describe in vivo EP delivery of plasmid DNA. This minireview is limited in scope to the most recent studies using in vivo EP for delivery of plasmid DNA. The focus is on those studies that demonstrated a clear therapeutic response with the potential to be used clinically.