AbstractEstimating the hydraulic properties of the vadose zone is essential to understand soil‐water dynamics and achieving appropriate water management in agricultural lands. Inverse modelling methods are commonly used to estimate hydraulic properties from field observations. Unlike the extensively applied local search methodologies, data assimilation techniques can fully account for multiple uncertainties and are becoming a widely used tool for estimating hydraulic parameters. However, only few applications on real field tests are available. The main objective of this study was to estimate the van Genuchten‐Mualem (VGM) parameters and the saturated hydraulic conductivity () of a heterogeneous low‐lying farmland at the margin of the Venice Lagoon, Italy, characterized by high peat content, sandy drifts, and a very shallow water table. To this end, two methods were tested, that is, the Ensemble Smoother (ES) and the Levenberg–Marquardt (LM) algorithm associated with hydrological modelling performed with Hydrus‐1D. Volumetric water content (VWC) observations were collected at three monitoring sites from May to September 2011. Results on parameters highlighted that the ES technique effectively reduced the uncertainty of and , but it was less effective on and . The results on VWC showed that the ES efficiency decreased with the increasing non‐linearity of the system (e.g., higher sand content) and when the variability of the experimental data was lower (e.g., deepest soil layers where saturation remained permanently close to 1). Both LM and ES allowed to reproduce the VWC observations in the calibration and validation phases, with the former and the latter performing better in the case of sandy and peat soils, respectively. As concerns the method applicability, the ES was less time‐demanding as it efficiently updated all the parameters at once and was less dependent on the user choices. Finally, the paper points out the importance of previous knowledge of the VGM parameters (e.g., from lab hydraulic analyses) in defining the constraints for the optimization.
Read full abstract