The article is devoted to the philosophical and legal analysis of social and legal anomie based on an anthropological approach, given that the loss of value, legal, and moral guidelines for a person during social anomie, first of all, puts him before the choice of a way of existence through selfrealization in a legitimate, or misconduct. It is emphasized that socio-legal anomie, as a crisis-transitional state of the development of society, is inherent in a certain period to all socio-legal formations. In order for society to restore full-fledged civilizational development, it is necessary to form value guidelines based on the norms of natural law according to the principle of anthropocentrism, which provides for the supremacy of the rights and freedoms of man and citizen and their protection by all legal methods and means. It has been found that with socio-legal anomie, the person comes to the fore, namely the need to observe and preserve their rights, freedoms, and human dignity, that is, the principle of human- centeredness is activated. A person with formed legitimate beliefs implements them in his own behavior, and also tries to direct the behavior of others in a legitimate direction, which allows him to avoid deviant behavior. The presence of stable value beliefs and orientations also prevents the manifestation of conformist behavior, in particular among young people. It is noted that today society is used to being guided by legal norms established and sanctioned by the state, and even a slight destabilization of this sphere can cause a certain collapse not only in the sphere of social and legal relations, but also in the personal self-realization of a person. This happens because a person ceases to feel fully protected by the state-legal mechanism and can disregard the principles of social coexistence for the purpose of self-realization. Such a situation often leads to manifestations of deviant behavior, or illegal and criminal behavior. We focus on the fact that natural and legal norms, as an ideal regulator of social relations, become a criterion for determining the lawful behavior of a person. Of course, such norms have always been taken as a basis for the formation of the legal framework in democratic, legal states, because if positive law did not contain the norms of natural law, then it would be purely an instruction of behavior, and not a living and effective law.
Read full abstract