Value Of Contrast-enhanced Ultrasonography Research Articles

Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis.

This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in diagnosing clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). Literature published in five databases was searched. Twelve studies were included. The pooled results showed sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio of CEUS were 79% (95% CI: 75%-83%), 84% (95% CI: 80%-88%), 4.97 (95% CI: 3.86-6.39), 0.24 (95% CI: 0.20-0.30), and 20.32 (95% CI: 13.84-29.84), respectively. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.86. In conclusion, CEUS demonstrates high sensitivity and specificity in diagnosing ccRCC, showing good diagnostic accuracy.

The value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in predicting stroke occurrence: A prospective study

ObjectivesThis study aimed to investigate the association between contrast-enhanced ultrasound-detected (CEUS) perfusion patterns of carotid plaque and the occurrence of stroke. Materials and methodsThis prospective observational study finally enrolled 256 patients (151 of them having undergone CEUS) from 7851 patients who underwent carotid artery ultrasound from May 2019 to December 2019 with the endpoint being the occurrence of stroke. The risk factors and carotid ultrasound fetures was obtained from those patients. Analyze the relationship between these variables and stoke occurrence. ResultsPatients in the recurrent stroke group and those in the no-recurrent stroke group were statistically different in stenosis rate, plaque echo, fibrous cap integrity, calcification of fibrous cap, hypoechoic area within the plaque, and the pattern of neovascularization perfusion from plaque surface to plaque interior (P < 0.05). Upon adjusting for variables, in all subjects, Cox regression analysis showed that symptoms experienced within the past 6 months (RR = 2.486, 95 % CI: 1.282–4.821), moderate-to-severe carotid stenosis (RR = 2.407, 95 % CI: 1.480–4.593), calcification of fibrous cap (RR = 1.599, 95 % CI: 0.727–3.516) and patchy hypoechoic areas within plaque (RR = 2.486, 95 % CI: 1.107–5.578)independently predicted stroke occurrence across all subjects.; Among subjects underwent CEUS, Cox regression analysis demonstrated that moderate-to-severe carotid artery stenosis (RR = 2.105, 95 % CI: 1.425–4.510) and microbubbles entering the interior of the plaque from its surface (RR = 2.323, 95 % CI: 1.175–4. 594) were independent predictors of stroke occurrence. ConclusionsThe neovascularization perfusion pattern from the plaque surface to its interior serves as an independent predictor of stroke occurrence, thereby potentially enhancing clinical decision-making.

Quantitative and qualitative analysis of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for differentiating benign and malignant superficial enlarged lymph nodes.

In many clinical situations, it is critical to exclude or identify abnormally lymph nodes (LNs). The nature of superficial abnormally LNs is closely related to the stage, treatment, and prognosis of the disease. Ultrasound (US) is an important method for examining superficial LNs due to its cheap and safe characteristics. However, it is still difficult to determine the nature of some LNs with overlapping benign and malignant features in images. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) can be used to evaluate the microperfusion status of tissues in real time, and it can improve diagnostic accuracy to a certain extent. Therefore, in this study, we will analyze the correlation between CEUS quantitative parameters and benign and malignant superficial abnormally LNs, to evaluate the efficacy and value of CEUS in distinguishing benign and malignant superficial LNs. This study retrospectively analyzed 120 patients of abnormal LNs who underwent US and CEUS at the China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University from December 2020 to August 2023. All 120 cases of abnormal LNs underwent US-guided coarse needle biopsy, and accurate pathological results were obtained, along with complete US and CEUS images. According to the pathological results, LNs were divided into benign and malignant groups, and the qualitative and quantitative parameters of US and CEUS between the two groups were analyzed. The cutoff value is determined by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of the subjects, and sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy are applied to evaluate the ability of the cutoff value to distinguish between the two groups. There were a total of 120 LNs, including 36 in the benign group and 84 in the malignant group. The results showed that malignant LNs were usually characterized by the disappearance of lymphatic hilum, round ness index (L/T) <2, irregular morphology, and the manifestation of uneven perfusion (P<0.05). The differences in the quantitative parameters peak enhancement (PE), rise time (RT), time to peak (TTP), wash-in rate (WIR), and wash-out rate (WOR) were statistically significant (P<0.05). The result showed that RT and TTP in the malignant LNs were higher than those in the benign LNs, while the PE, WIR, and WOR were lower. A comparison of the ∆ values showed that the differences in ∆PE, ∆WIR, and ∆fall time (FT) were statistically significant (P<0.05), Among them, the ∆PE and ∆WIR of malignant LNs were higher than those of benign LNs, while the ∆FT was lower than that of benign LNs. Quantitative analysis of CEUS features is valuable in the diagnosis of benign and malignant LNs, and US combined with CEUS helps to improve the accuracy of identifying the nature of LNs.

The Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in the Evaluation of Central Lung Cancer with Obstructive Atelectasis.

Purpose: To assess the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) alongside contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) in evaluating central lung cancer (CLC). Materials and Methods: From 2006 to 2022, 54 patients with CLC and obstructive atelectasis (OAT) underwent standardized examinations using CEUS in addition to CECT. The ability to differentiate CLC from atelectatic tissue in CECT and CEUS was categorized as distinguishable or indistinguishable. In CEUS, in distinguishable cases, the order of enhancement (time to enhancement) (OE; categorized as either an early pulmonary arterial [PA] pattern or a delayed bronchial arterial [BA] pattern of enhancement), the extent of enhancement (EE; marked or reduced), the homogeneity of enhancement (HE; homogeneous or inhomogeneous), and the decrease in enhancement (DE; rapid washout [<120 s] or late washout [≥120 s]) were evaluated. Results: The additional use of CEUS improved the diagnostic capability of CECT from 75.9% to 92.6% in differentiating a CLC from atelectatic tissue. The majority of CLC cases exhibited a BA pattern of enhancement (89.6%), an isoechoic reduced enhancement (91.7%), and a homogeneous enhancement (91.7%). Rapid DE was observed in 79.2% of cases. Conclusions: In cases of suspected CLC with obstructive atelectasis, the application of CEUS can be helpful in differentiating tumor from atelectatic tissue and in evaluating CLC.

Value of contrast-enhanced sonography in the diagnosis of vesicoureteral reflux.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the urinary tract and bladder (ceVUS) is an alternative examination method to micturition cysturethrography (MCU/VCUG) for suspected vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) that is increasing in practice. The purpose of this review is to present the current value of ceVUS in the diagnosis. A systematic literature search was performed using the keywords "vesicoureteral reflux", "ceVUS", "VCUG" of the databases MEDLINE and Cochrane Library as well as a review of current German, European, and American guidelines on this topic. In addition, recommendations for action in clinical practice were developed. ceVUS is a quick-to-learn examination method that is equivalent to VCUG for the diagnosis of vesicoureteral reflux and should be used as the diagnostic method of first choice when available given the absence of radiation exposure. · Like VCUG, ceVUS is the diagnostic method of first choice in suspected vesicoureteral reflux and should be used preferentially given the absence of radiation exposure.. · Especially in comparison to the alternative VCUG, ceVUS is a quick-to-learn examination method.. · ceVUS can also be used to diagnose other pathologies of the lower urinary tract.. · Conen P, Thiemann J, Stredele R et al. Value of contrast-enhanced sonography in the diagnosis of vesicoureteral reflux. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2024; 196: 1022 - 1028.

Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the activity of idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis: a retrospective study.

To explore the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the disease activity of idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis (IRPF). This retrospective study included 148 CEUS examinations from 63 patients with IRPF treated in our hospital from April 2016 to September 2021. They were divided into two groups: IRPF active group (69 examinations) and inactive group (79 examinations). Uni- and multivariable analyses were used to identify independent risk factors for IRPF activity. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were drawn to establish different diagnostic models to evaluate the diagnostic value of IRPF activity. The z test was used to compare the differences of the area under the curves (AUCs). The value of CEUS in evaluating the variation of disease activity over time was also investigated between repeat patient studies. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed the thickness [odds ratio (OR) = 14.125, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 3.017-66.123] was the most significant independent risk factor for IRPF activity (P < 0.01). The best diagnostic model was model 3, which was established by CEUS score combined with thickness. The AUC was 0.944 (95%CI = 0.912-0.977), and the sensitivity and specificity were 89.86% and 86.08%, respectively. The diagnostic performance was not significantly improved after combining clinical symptom (back pain) and laboratory indicators [erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP)]. Compared with before treatment, the CEUS score and thickness were significantly decreased after treatment (x2 = 14.580, P < 0.001 and z = 4.708, P < 0.001, respectively). CEUS has good diagnostic value for IRPF disease activity. Key points •Thickness and contrast-enhanced ultrasound score were significantly higher in the active group than those in inactive group (P < 0.001). •With thickness of 4 mm and contrast-enhanced ultrasound 2 score as optimal cut-off values, the sensitivity and specificity were 89.86%, 81.01% and 52.17%, 100.00%, respectively. •During follow-up, when the disease progressed, the change of CEUS score was earlier than the change of thickness.

Assessment of the Effects of Sphingosine Kinase 1/Sphingosine-1-Phosphate on Microangiogenesis at Rat Myofascial Trigger Points Using Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography.

Few studies have assessed the effects of sphingosine kinase 1/sphingosine-1-phosphate (SPHK1/S1P) on microangiogenesis at rat myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) using contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS). This study aimed to address these deficiencies. Here, we investigated the effects of SPHK1/S1P on MTrP microangiogenesis and the value of CEUS in evaluating these effects. Forty Sprague‒Dawley rats were subdivided into two groups: control and MTrP groups. MTrPs were established by 8 weeks of the strike procedure combined with eccentric motion and 4 weeks of recovery. All rats were euthanized after having undergone CEUS with an overdose of pentobarbital sodium. MTrP and control tissue samples were removed for haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) imaging. The tissue was dehydrated, cleared, and embedded before sectioning. The sections were then incubated overnight at 4°C, and immunohistochemistry was carried out with primary antibodies including rabbit anti-CD31, rabbit anti-SPHK1and rabbit anti-S1PR1. MTrP rats exhibited spontaneous electrical activity (SEA) and a local twitch response (LTR) during electromyography (EMG) examination. The CEUS time-intensity curves (TICs) showed that the perfusion intensity in the MTrPs and surrounding tissue area was increased, with faster perfusion than in normal sites, while the TICs in the control group slowly increased and then slowly decreased. The correlation coefficient between the microvessel density (MVD) and sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor 1 (S1PR1) was 0.716 (p <0.01). Spearman correlation analysis revealed that Spearman's rho (ρ) values between the MVD and peak intensity (PI), between the MVD and area under the curve (AUC), and between the MVD and SPHK1 were > 0.5 (p <0.05), > 0.7 (p <0.01), and > 0.7 (p <0.01), respectively. CEUS is valuable for detecting microangiogenesis within MTrPs, and SPHK1/S1P plays an important role in promoting MTrP tissue microangiogenesis.

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography for Transabdominal and Transrectal Ultrasound in Staging Cervical Cancer: A Reliability Study.

This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the consistency of transrectal contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (TR-CEUS) with post-operative pathology and the value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) in staging surgically treated cervical cancer when combined with conventional ultrasonography (US). From October 2020 to March 2023, hospitalized patients with stage IB and II cervical cancer confirmed by total hysterectomy were consecutively enrolled. The standard images of US and CEUS by transabdominal (TA-US/CEUS) and transrectal (TR-US/CEUS) approaches and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were acquired, on which the size and stage of the tumors were evaluated, and the consistency of results with the pathological specimen was analyzed. Thirty-nine patients with cervical cancer were finally enrolled in this study. The results showed that CEUS significantly improved the reliability of TA-US in evaluating tumor diameter; the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was from 0.672 to 0.735. TR-US indicated good reliability with or without the addition of CEUS (ICC=0.796 and 0.780). In terms of tumor staging, CEUS improved the consistency of transabdominal (weighted κ values from 0.689 to 0.731) and transrectal staging of tumors (κ from 0.758 to 0.785), and the staging of TR-US combined with TR-CEUS had the highest consistency with post-operative results, similar to MRI (κ, respectively 0.785 and 0.789). CEUS can reflect the heterogeneity of the tumor. Heterogeneous enhancement and perfusion defects were more common in >2 cm cervical cancer (50%, 20/40 and 52.5%, 21/40), respectively, and perfusion defects were more common in moderately to poorly differentiated tumors (66.67%, 20/30). For stage IB and IIA cervical cancer, CEUS can aid in assessing the International Federation for Gynecology and Obstetrics staging of tumors alongside TA-US and TR-US. The combination of TR-US and TR-CEUS has shown good consistency with pathology in the staging of cervical cancer, comparable to that of MRI.

Value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in detection of endoleak after endovascular repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm

Objective: To investigate the value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in detecting endoleak after endovascular repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR). Methods: The postoperative follow-up data of 102 patients with infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm treated with EVAR in Tianjin Medical University General Hospital from August 2015 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 79 males and 23 females, aged 50-91 (69.6±7.6) years old. Using CT angiography (CTA) as the gold standard for diagnosing endoleaks, the effectiveness of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and CDUS in detecting endoleaks was evaluated by paired design chi-square test, and the Kappa value was calculated for consistency test. Patients were divided into groups according to body mass index (BMI), and the number of false-negative endoleaks detected by contrast-enhanced ultrasound in each group was calculated, and its ratio to the actual number of endoleaks was calculated to evaluate whether BMI was related to false-negative ultrasound-enhanced ultrasound. Results: A total of 203 follow-up visits met the inclusion criteria. Endoleaks were detected 36 times (17.7%) by CTA, 31 times (15.3%) by contrast-enhanced ultrasound, 16 times (7.9%) by CDUS, and they all detected type Ⅰ, type Ⅱ and type Ⅲ endoleaks. There was no significant difference between contrast-enhanced ultrasound and CTA in endoleak detection rate and determination of endoleak types (endoleak detection rate: 15.3% vs 17.7%; determination of endoleak types: type Ⅰ 4 vs 4, type Ⅱ 26 vs 31, type Ⅲ 1 vs 1; all P>0.05). CDUS and CTA had statistically significant differences in the detection rate of endoleaks and determination of endoleak types (endoleak detection rate: 7.9% vs 17.7%; determination of endoleak types: type Ⅰ 4 vs 4, type Ⅱ 11 vs 31, type Ⅲ 1 vs 1; all P<0.001). Compared with CTA, contrast-enhanced ultrasound has a sensitivity of 83.3%, a specificity of 99.4%, a Youden index of 0.827, a coincidence rate of 96.6%, a positive predictive value of 96.8%, a negative predictive value of 96.5%, and a Kappa value of 0.875(P<0.001). The two showed excellent diagnostic consistency. All 6 endoleaks not detected by contrast-enhanced ultrasound were type Ⅱ endoleak that did not require treatment, and 3(15.8%) occurred in obese patients with a BMI≥32 kg/m2. Compared with CTA, CDUS had a sensitivity of 38.9%, a specificity of 98.8%, a Youden index of 0.377, a coincidence rate of 88.2%, a positive predictive value of 87.5%, a negative predictive value of 88.2%, and a Kappa value of 0.482 (P<0.001). The two showed moderate diagnostic agreement. The correlation coefficient of the maximum diameter of aneurysms measured by ultrasound and CT was r=0.873(P<0.001). Conclusions: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound is accurate in detecting endoleak after infrarenal EVAR, and its sensitivity to endoleak detection in obese patients with BMI≥32 kg/m2 will be reduced. CDUS is not suitable for detection of endoleak after infrarenal EVAR, but it can be used to monitor the change of the largest diameter of aneurysm after EVAR.

The value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in differential diagnosis of primary testicular germ cell tumors and non-germ cell tumors over 50 years old.

Unlike young and middle-aged patients, seminoma is not common in patients with primary testicular tumors over the age of 50, so it cannot follow the general ideas and norms for diagnosing and treating testicular tumors, and its characteristics need to be considered separately. The conventional ultrasonography and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) findings of primary testicular tumors in patients over 50 years old were retrospectively analyzed and compared with the pathological results to compare the diagnostic value of these two methods. Of the 13 primary testicular tumors, 8 were primary lymphomas. Conventional ultrasound of 13 cases of testicular tumors showed hypoechoic with rich blood flow, and it was difficult to identify the type accurately. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of conventional ultrasonography in diagnosing non-germ cell tumors (lymphoma and Leydig cell tumor) were 40.0%, 33.3%, 66.7%, 14.3%, and 38.5%, respectively. CEUS findings: 7 of 8 lymphomas showed uniform hyperenhancement. 2 cases of Leydig cell tumors showed uniform high enhancement. 2 cases of seminoma and 1 case of spermatocytic tumor showed heterogeneous enhancement, with necrosis in the interior. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy rate of non-germ cell tumor diagnosis according to the non-necrotic area of CEUS were 90.0%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 75.0% and 92.3%, respectively. Compared with conventional ultrasound, the difference was statistically significant (P=0.039). Primary testicular tumors in patients over 50 years old are mainly lymphoma, and CEUS is significantly different between germ cell tumors and non-germ cell tumors. Compared with conventional ultrasound, CEUS can distinguish testicular germ cell tumors from non-germ cell tumors more accurately. Preoperative ultrasonography is significant for accurate diagnosis and can guide clinical treatment.

The value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in the diagnosis of primary testicular non-neoplastic and neoplastic lesions in adults

BackgroundDifferent pathological types of testicular tumors are treated differently. Malignant germ cell tumors require radical orchiectomy, while benign tumors may only need mass enucleation. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) is more sensitive than conventional ultrasonography in displaying tumor microvessels, which helps distinguish between benign and malignant tumors.MethodsThis was a retrospective analysis of 35 patients with pathological-confirmed primary testicular non-neoplastic and neoplastic lesions in our hospital from February 2017 to February 2022. Conventional ultrasonography and CEUS imaging findings of included lesions were retrospectively analyzed and their diagnostic values were compared with the pathological results.ResultsThere were 13 cases of benign testicular lesions (including 1 case of spontaneous hematoma, 2 cases of segmental infarctions, 5 cases of epidermoid cysts, 2 cases of Sertoli cell tumors, and 3 cases of Leydig cell tumors) and 23 cases of malignant testicular lesions (including 10 cases of seminomas, 1 case of embryonal carcinoma, 2 cases of mixed germ cell tumors, 2 cases of spermatocytic tumors, and 8 cases of lymphomas). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy rates of conventional ultrasound in diagnosing benign testicular tumors by "onion skin-like" echo (epidermoid cysts) and peripheral annular blood flow were 30.8%, 100.0%, 100.0%, 71.9% and 75.0%, respectively. All testicular non-neoplastic lesions and epidermoid cysts showed no enhancement by CEUS. All Sertoli-Leydig cell tumors (SLCTs)’ CEUS imaging showed uniform high enhancement (no necrosis area), fast forward, and slow backward. 80.0% (12/15) malignant germ cell tumors showed heterogeneous enhancement and fast forward and fast backward in CEUS. All lymphomas showed fast forward and fast backward, and 87.5% (7/8) of them showed uniform high levels of enhancement in CEUS. According to CEUS without enhancement (non-neoplastic lesions and epidermoid cysts) and uniform high enhancement with fast forward and slow backward (SLCT), the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy rates for diagnosing benign testicular tumors were all 100.0%. Compared with conventional ultrasound, the difference was statistically significant (p = 0.004).ConclusionsCEUS could accurately distinguish between benign and malignant testicular tumors, as well as differentiate specific pathological types (testicular focal infarction, epidermoid cysts, spermatocytic tumors, SLTC and lymphoma). Accurate preoperative diagnosis is critical for guiding the selection of appropriate treatment plans for different pathological types of testicular tumors.

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography of the placental barrier; the protective umbrella of the fetus during pregnancy.

Ultrasonography is the preferred technique to evaluate the status of maternal and fetal health during pregnancy. Non-obstetric acute or chronic conditions occurring during pregnancy must be diagnosed as early as possible to permit timely and necessary treatment for the sake of maternal and fetal health. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) during pregnancy. This prospective study included 14 pregnant women requiring pregnancy termination and six healthy pregnant women. The 14 pregnant women requiring pregnancy termination underwent CEUS prior to surgery to investigate the pattern of contrast agent diffusion. The six healthy pregnant women did not undergo CEUS. The structure of placentae with and without contrast agent injection were also compared by light microscopy. CEUS analysis failed to identify any signs of contrast agents in the umbilical cord blood and fetus. There were no obvious changes in the morphology of placentae with and without contrast agent injection under light microscope. CEUS identified the need for early treatment in one pregnant woman with an ovarian tumor. Due to the protective effect of the placental barrier on the fetus, CEUS during pregnancy may represent a safe form of imaging technology that can provide valuable information for the diagnosis of non-obstetric acute or chronic disorders and to guide thefuture treatment of pregnant women.

Pyogenic liver abscess: contrast-enhanced ultrasound allows morpho-evolutive classification and guides personalized management

Aim: The aim of this study is to propose a contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)-based morphologic classification of pyogenic liver abscess (PLA) reflecting different evolutive stages and to assess the added value of CEUS in the management of PLA. Methods: Forty-four PLAs of different etiologies in 44 patients (male/female = 24/20; mean age 66 ± 14.7 years) were evaluated with ultrasound (US) B-mode and CEUS (using SonoVue). PLAs were mainly located in the right lobe (n = 28, 63.6%) with a mean diameter of 6.8 cm [standard deviation (SD) ± 3.2, range 1.7–15 cm]. Conventional US findings were categorized as the presence and extension of liquified areas, echogenicity and echostructure of the index lesion. Peripheral hyperenhancing rim, transient segmental enhancement, hyperenhancing septa and “honeycomb” aspect were considered PLA hallmarks in the arterial phase after contrast agent injection. CEUS results were judged as clinically relevant if they modified the approach to percutaneous treatment in comparison with pre-operative US B-mode findings. Results: CEUS was superior to US B-mode as to depiction of PLA internal echostructure and enabled identification of 4 evolutive stages of PLA: type I (tumor-like), type II (“honeycomb”), type III (multiloculated with incomplete septa), and type IV (cystic-like). In 22 cases (67.4%) out of 34 who underwent percutaneous treatment, the operator tailored percutaneous approach according to PLA internal echostructure observed during CEUS exam. Conclusions: CEUS depicts the internal structure of PLA so allowing a morpho-evolutive classification of PLA and provides invaluable information for immediately tailoring the management to the single case. By showing the structure of PLA more precisely, CEUS allows a morpho-evolutive PLA classification and guides tailored management in the single case.

The value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant ovarian sex cord stromal tumors.

Sex cord-stromal tumors (SCSTs) are uncommon neoplasms that are typically difficult to diagnose before surgery due to limited experience in their medical imaging. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) can evaluate the microvessel density of tumors, and the microvessel density of malignant tumors is significantly greater than that of benign tumors, so this provides a method for CEUS to differentiate benign and malignant tumors. The CEUS diagnoses of 31 patients with pathologically confirmed SCSTs were retrospectively analyzed and compared to conventional ultrasound-based diagnoses. Based on the pathological results, the patients were divided into benign and non-benign groups. Using pathology as the gold standard, four-table data were used to evaluate the authenticity of conventional ultrasonography and CEUS. Among these 31 SCST patients, only the size of the lesion and the stripy hypoenhancement on CEUS differed significantly between the benign group and the non-benign group (P<0.05). In the benign group (n=25), 22 patients showed sparse stripes of hypoenhancement, 1 showed no enhancement, and 2 showed hyperenhancement. In 5 cases of malignant SCSTs, 4 showed hyperenhancement (with non-enhanced areas inside the tumor), and 1 showed sparse strips of hypoenhancement; in 1 case of borderline SCST, the tumor showed uniform hyperenhancement. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy rate of the conventional ultrasound diagnoses for the 31 SCST patients were 52.0%, 16.7%, 72.2%, 7.7%, and 45.2%, respectively. In relation to CEUS, sparse strips of hypoenhancement or no enhancement were valuable diagnostic criteria for diagnosing benign SCSTs. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy rate of CEUS were 92.0%, 83.3%, 95.8%, 71.4%, and 90.3%, respectively. The accuracy of CEUS was higher than that of conventional US, and the difference was statistically significant (χ2=14.467, P=0.000). Sparse strips of hypoenhancement or no enhancement on CEUS are the characteristic manifestations of benign SCSTs, and hyperenhancement (with a non-enhanced area observable inside the mass) may be suggestive of malignant tumors. CEUS significantly improved the differentiation of benign and malignant SCSTs.

The Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in the Evaluation of Carotid Web.

ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to investigate whether contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is more advantageous than conventional ultrasound in the diagnosis of carotid web (CaW) and to compare the clinical characteristics of patients in different age groups.MethodsSeventeen patients admitted to the hospital from October 2019 to December 2021 were included in our study. Patients were initially diagnosed with CaW using digital subtraction angiography (DSA), and conventional ultrasound and CEUS were completed. Baseline patient data were analyzed and compared between the <60 years old CaW group and the ≥60 years old CaW group to explore the differences between the two groups. Then, comparing the accuracy of conventional ultrasound and CEUS.ResultsA total of 17 CaW patients participated in this study, including 4 female patients (23.5%) and 13 male patients (76.5%), with an average age of 59.41 (±10.86) years. There were 9 patients (52.9%) with left CaW and 8 patients (47.1%) with right CaW. Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) occurred in 14 patients (82.4%). Thrombosis occurred in five of 17 patients (29.4%). There was a significant statistical difference about the thrombosis between the <60 years old CaW group and the ≥60 years old CaW group [<60 years group: 0 (0%), ≥60 years group: 5 (62.5%), P = 0.005]. Seven patients (41.2%) received medical management, nine patients (52.9%) had carotid artery stenting (CAS), and one patient (5.9%) had carotid endarterectomy (CEA). None of the patients had recurrent stroke during the follow-up period. The diagnostic rate of CaW and thrombus by CEUS was higher than that by conventional ultrasound, and there was a significant statistical difference in the diagnosis of thrombus between CEUS and conventional ultrasound (χ2 = 4.286, P = 0.038).ConclusionsCEUS may have a higher diagnostic accuracy for CaW with thrombosis, and it has a higher clinical application prospect.

Development and Validation of a Prognostic Nomogram for Prognosis in Patients With Renal Artery Stenosis.

Background and ObjectiveRenal artery stenosis (RAS) is associated with an increased risk of renal function deterioration (RFD). Our previous study showed that renal cortical blood perfusion assessed by contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) was an important related factor for RFD in RAS patients. Based on several conventional related factors confirmed by previous studies, we aimed to establish and verify a CEUS+ scoring system to evaluate the risk of RFD at 1 year of follow-up in RAS patients.MethodsThis study was a single-center retrospective study. A total of 497 elderly RAS patients (247 in the training group and 250 in the verification group) admitted to the Beijing Hospital from January 2016 to December 2019 were included. The baseline characteristics of the patients on admission (including general conditions, previous medical history, blood pressure, blood creatinine, RAS, and cortical blood perfusion in the affected kidney) and renal function [glomerular filtration rate (GFR)] at 1-year of follow-up were collected. We used the univariate and multivariate logistic regressions to establish a CEUS+ scoring system model, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and area under the curve (AUC) to evaluate prediction accuracy, and the decision curve analysis and nomogram to evaluate the clinical application value of CEUS+ scoring system model.ResultsAmong the 497 patients enrolled, 266 (53.5%) were men, with an average age of (51.7 ± 19.3) years. The baseline clinical-radiomic data of the training group and the verification group were similar (all p > 0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis results showed that age [Odds ratio (OR) = 1.937, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.104–3.397), diabetes (OR = 1.402, 95% CI: 1.015–1.938), blood pressure (OR = 1.575, 95% CI: 1.138–2.182), RAS (OR = 1.771, 95% CI: 1.114–2.816), and area under ascending curve (AUCi) (OR = 2.131, 95% CI: 1.263–3.596) were related factors for the renal function deterioration after 1 year of follow-up (all p < 0.05). The AUC of the ROC curve of the CEUS+ scoring system model of the training group was 0.801, and the Youden index was 0.725 (specificity 0.768, sensitivity 0.813); the AUC of the ROC curve of the validation group was 0.853, Youden index was 0.718 (specificity 0.693, sensitivity 0.835). There was no significant difference in ROC curves between the two groups (D = 1.338, p = 0.325). In addition, the calibration charts of the training and verification groups showed that the calibration curve of the CEUS+ scoring system was close to the standard curve (p = 0.701, p = 0.823, both p > 0.10).ConclusionThe CEUS+ scoring system model is helpful in predicting the risk of worsening renal function in elderly RAS patients.

Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Mummified Thyroid Nodules.

Mummified thyroid nodules (MTNs) are rarely reported and are usually misdiagnosed as malignant nodules. This article first reviewed the contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) enhancement features of 218 MTNs and classified them into three (A, B, C) patterns. The A pattern MTNs show linear hypo-enhancement, the B pattern MTNs show heterogeneous hypo-enhancement, and the C pattern MTNs show no enhancement in thyroid nodules. The A and C pattern enhancements of MTNs demonstrated a high specificity compared with the enhancement of previously reported typical papillary thyroid carcinomas (PTCs). To further study the B pattern MTNs, 24 B pattern MTNs and 42 PTCs were enrolled in this study, and CEUS parameters for each nodule were evaluated. Univariate analysis indicated that compared with PTCs, the B pattern MTNs more frequently exhibited heterogeneous hypo-enhancement and clear margins after clearance (p <0.05). A multivariate analysis revealed that heterogeneous hypo-enhancement and clear margins after clearance were independent characteristics related to the B pattern MTNs for differentiating them from PTCs (p <0.05). Thus, preoperative CEUS may provide more important information for distinguishing MTNs from malignant thyroid nodules to avoid surgical excisions or unnecessary fine-needle aspiration (FNA).

Comparative the clinical value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography, enhancement CT and MRI for diagnosing of liver lesions.

To investigate the accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography, CT-enhancement and MRI in the diagnosis of liver-occupying lesions. 176 patients with suspected liver lesions in our hospital were retrospectively studied from July 2014 to July 2016. All of the 176 patients were diagnosed by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography, enhanced CT and MRI, and the pathological examination was performed. The results of pathological examination were regarded as the results of the diagnosis. The diagnostic accuracywas then compared among contrast-enhanced ultrasound, enhanced CT and MRI of these patients. The results of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography showed that 164 of the 176 patients had liver-occupying lesions, and the accuracy of the diagnosis was 95.35%, which was significantly higher than that of CT enhancement and MRI (80.23% 84.30%). The accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography, in the diagnosis of primary liver cancer was significantly higher than that of CT enhancement and MRI (P < 0.05), and the difference was significant difference (P < 0.05). The examination of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography is relatively simple, and the patients can get duplicateexamination, so we should choose the contrast-enhanced ultrasonography as the preferred method of diagnosis in liver mass, especially primary liver cancer.

Diagnostic Performance of Atherosclerotic Carotid Plaque Neovascularization with Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound: A Meta-Analysis.

Objectives To evaluate the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for atherosclerotic carotid plaque neovascularization. Methods The electronic databases like PubMed, Embase, OVID, and Web of Science were used to search for the relevant studies, which are involved in the evaluation of the diagnostic parameters of QUS for atherosclerotic carotid plaque neovascularization. Review Manager 5.4 and Stata 14.0 were used to estimate the pooled diagnostic value of CEUS. Forest plots, sensitivity analysis, and Deeks' funnel plots were performed on the included studies. Results Ten studies eventually met the final inclusion criteria. For diagnostic performance, CUES showed that the pooled values of sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood odds ratios, negative likelihood odds ratios, and diagnostic odds ratios were 0.83 (95% CI 0.78-0.86), 0.77 (95% CI 0.68-0.84), 3.61 (95% CI 2.59-5.03), 0.23 (95% CI 0.18-0.28), and 16.02 (95% CI 10.02-25.60), respectively. The estimate of the area under curve (AUC) was 0.85 (95% CI 0.82-0.88). Conclusion Our research supported that CEUS had high sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of atherosclerotic carotid plaque neovascularization. More high-quality prospective multicenter studies focusing on the accuracy of CEUS for carotid atherosclerotic plaque should be performed to verify our conclusions.

Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound for Diagnosis of Renal Cystic Mass

Background: Cystic Renal Cell Carcinoma (CRCC) is often difficult to differentiate from complex cysts with sonographic manifestations of renal carcinoma. Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) is a new technology, and its clinical utility in the diagnosis of renal cystic mass has not been established. Objective: The objective of this study is to analyze the characteristics of CEUS of renal cystic masses and to explore the clinical significance and value of CEUS in the diagnosis of CRCC. Methods: This study was a retrospective study. A total of 32 cystic masses from January 2018 to December 2019 were selected. The images of conventional Ultrasound (US) and CEUS were confirmed via surgical pathology. Routine US was used to observe the location, shape, size, boundary, cyst wall, internal echo, and blood supply of each cystic mass. CEUS observed contrast enhancement of the cyst wall, cystic septa, and solid nodules of cystic masses. Results: There were 26 cases of CRCC, 5 cases of renal cysts, and 1 case of renal tuberculosis. The enhancement pattern, degree of enhancement, and pseudocapsular sign by CEUS in benign and malignant masses had statistically significant differences (P&lt;.05). In the diagnosis of CRCC, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 92.3%, 83.3%, 90.6%, 96.0%, and 71.4% for CEUS; 57.6%, 66.7%, 59.3%, 88.2%, and 26.7% for conventional US, respectively. CEUS had a higher sensitivity and accuracy than the conventional US (P&lt;.05), although the diagnostic specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of the two methods were not significantly different (P&gt;.05). Conclusion: CEUS is more accurate in the diagnosis of renal cystic masses, and it can be used as an effective imaging method.