Valuation Effects Research Articles

The Valuation Effect and Consequences of Clawback Adoption in Real Estate Investment Trusts

The Valuation Effect and Consequences of Clawback Adoption in Real Estate Investment Trusts

Finding the right shade of embeddedness: the effect of political embeddedness on green innovation

PurposeFew efforts have considered political embeddedness heterogeneity and examined whether different types of political embeddedness can pose different valuation effect on green innovation. Address to this concern, this paper aims to provide a more nuanced conceptualization of different types of political embeddedness and their effects on green innovation.Design/methodology/approachThis paper conducts negative binomial method to test our predicts and adopts propensity score match (PSM) and placebo test to mitigate endogeneity issues.FindingsThe interpersonal political embeddedness (IPPE) has a stronger positive effect on green innovation than the interorganizational political embeddedness (IOPE) and that such effect depends on multiple factors at an individual (i.e. Cheif executive officer (CEO) duality), firm (i.e. firm growth) and environment (i.e. industrial competition) level. Figure 1 is the research model. The relationship is more pronounced when the firm has a dual leadership structure and a high level of firm growth and is less pronounced when a firm is engaged in intensive industrial competition.Originality/valueThe authors extend political embeddedness literature by introducing and distinguishing the concept of IPPE and IOPE. The authors enrich green innovation research by revealing how corporate green innovation is effected by the IPPE and the IOPE.

The currency channel of the global bank leverage cycle

The amplitude of leverage procyclicality is heterogeneous across banks and across countries. This paper introduces international diversification of bank balance sheets as a factor in this observed heterogeneity, with a special emphasis on currency diversification. Based on a new theoretical framework, it shows that the impact of international diversification on leverage procyclicality depends on the relative performance of economies, the global business cycle and the exchange rate regime. By altering the distribution of global bank portfolios, international diversification adds a currency channel to the risk channel of the global leverage cycle. Using granular data on banks located in Prance, the paper shows that the pre-crisis international diversification of banks increased leverage procyclicality during the 2008–2009 crisis. Focusing on the currency channel, namely the valuation effect of currency diversification, my results show that it had a negative effect on leverage procyclicality during this period. The currency channel thus helped to offset part of the increased risk caused by the crisis. These findings draw attention to the specific role of balance sheet currency diversification in financial stability risk.

A clash of cultures: The governance and valuation effects of corporate cultural distance

AbstractWe find that the cultural distance between the CEO and a firm's directors increases the sensitivity of CEO turnover and compensation to performance while enhancing shareholder value. This effect is concentrated in the cultural distance between the CEO and independent directors. More culturally distant CEOs adopt less risky financial and operating policies. To establish causality, we use the sudden exit of directors as a source of exogenous change in cultural distance. Overall, our results suggest that cultural distance increases information collection costs. This causes the board to monitor with increased rigor and to rely on “hard” information to assess CEO performance.

Corporate climate risk and stock market reaction to performance briefings in China.

This study aims to enrich our understanding of the valuation consequence of climate risk in financial markets. The primary focus of our study is on the stock price reaction to firms’ climate-risk-related information. We employ transcripts of Chinese listed firms’ performance briefings to capture the climate risk at the firm level. Using a sample of Chinese listed firms between 2009 and 2021, we find that greater corporate climate risks lead to negative market reactions over a short time window, consistent with the market quickly comprehending corporate climate risks. This result holds for a series of robustness checks. We further find that the negative impact of corporate climate risk on the stock price reaction operates through the increased market trading activities, greater investor attention, and reduced positive media coverage. Finally, we demonstrate that industry carbon emission, local abnormal temperature, state ownership, institutional shareholding, and dividend payout are important moderators that shape the association of the corporate climate risk and the adverse market reaction. Our evidence suggests that disclosures of climate-related information can help the stock market to price climate risk more efficiently.

Do investors value audit quality of complex estimates?

In recent years, Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) inspections have repeatedly reported audit deficiencies related to complex fair value measurements. Motivated by the PCAOB's concern, this paper investigates whether audit quality of fair value measurements has information value to investors. Using a sample of U.S. public banks during 2008–2019, I find a significantly positive (negative) association between stock prices (bid-ask spreads) and the perceived audit quality of fair value estimates. This finding is consistent with investors valuing audit quality as it enhances the reliability of—and reduces the uncertainty associated with—complex estimates. Furthermore, using the fair value hierarchy mandated by SFAS 157, Fair Value Measurement, I find the incremental valuation effect of the perceived audit quality is greater for the substantial estimation uncertainties and potential management bias inherent in Level 3 fair value assets. In addition, I find some evidence that an auditor's banking industry expertise plays a more significant role than Big 4 status in investors' perceptions of audit quality with respect to FVM. Additional cross-sectional results reveal that the documented effect is greater for banks with declining capital adequacy and for smaller banks. Collectively, my findings suggest that perceived audit quality is important to investors in assessing the informativeness of complex fair value measurements.

The Impact of Stochastic Volatility on Initial Margin and MVA for Interest Rate Derivatives

ABSTRACT In this research we investigate the impact of stochastic volatility on future initial margin (IM) and margin valuation adjustment (MVA) calculations for interest rate derivatives. An analysis is performed under different market conditions, namely during the peak of the Covid-19 crisis when the markets were stressed and during Q4 of 2020 when volatilities were low. The Cheyette short-rate model is extended by adding a stochastic volatility component, which is calibrated to fit the EUR swaption volatility surfaces. We incorporate the latest risk-free rate benchmarks (RFR), which in certain markets have been selected to replace the IBOR index. We extend modern Fourier pricing techniques to accommodate the RFR benchmark and derive closed-form sensitivity expressions, which are used to model IM profiles in a Monte Carlo simulation framework. The various results are compared to the deterministic volatility case. The results reveal that the inclusion of a stochastic volatility component can have a considerable impact on nonlinear derivatives, especially for far out-of-the-money swaptions. The effect is particularly pronounced if the market exhibits a substantial skew or smile in the implied volatility curve. This can have severe consequences for funding cost valuation and risk management.

Impact of Investment Openness on National External Wealth: Based on Valuation Effects Perspective

In recent years, the rise of investment protectionism has led to the decline of investment openness all over the world. Based on the perspective of valuation effects which affects changes in national external wealth, we carry out empirical analysis and find that investment openness has inhibitory effect on national external wealth in the short term but promotes it in the lag period. Furthermore, we use the open economy macroeconomic theory (NOEM) to construct DSGE model and find that reducing the degree of investment openness will lead to the rise of domestic investment asset prices and produce positive valuation effects, which will lead to the short term increase of national external wealth. However, this effect has poor persistence. In the long run, the reduction of openness will hinder transnational investment, reduce the income of transnational investment, and eventually lead to the deterioration of national external wealth. The DSGE model we constructed can be applicable for solving some problems for open economic policy. From the conclusion we have acquired, it is indicated that nations who want to maintain the steady growth of the external wealth should continue to improve investment openness and international investment environment, alleviate investment information asymmetry, and avert increasing investment protectionism.

Legal protection systems, corporate governance and firm performance: a cross-country comparison

PurposeThis paper builds on the “Law and Finance” theory and aims to examine the effect of the legal and institutional environment on the governance–performance relationship in the context of non-US firms. More precisely, it examines whether and how the country’s legal system and the level of investor protection interact with the firm-level corporate governance and affect firm performance.Design/methodology/approachThe authors used the “G-Index” governance score developed by the Governance Metrics International rating for a sample of 12,728 firm-year observations from 23 countries over the 2009–2016 period.FindingsThe results show that the interaction between the country-level institutions and corporate governance system significantly affect the firm performance. In particular, the findings indicate that firms operating in common law countries tend to exhibit a positive valuation effect and higher performance than firms with a comparable corporate governance level operating in civil law countries. More precisely, the authors find that in common law countries, higher investor protection with enhanced corporate governance is associated with better firm performance. However, firms operating in civil law countries with weaker investor protection and a comparable corporate governance level tend to experience a negative valuation effect.Originality/valueThe findings suggest that the institutional and legal environment is crucial and important in determining the value-maximizing level of good governance practices. Managers and regulators should carefully analyze the cost of these initiatives and should coordinate it with the needs of the country’s legal system. The challenge for the company will be how to adjust its corporate governance strategy according to the needs and demands of the country’s legal system in which the company operates to improve its performance. The regulators should ensure a fit between the specifics of the national legal and institutional environment and corporate governance standards and practices.

Emotions in New Venture Teams: Affects as Signals, Emotional Diversity, and Valuation Effects in Crowdfunded Projects

Emotions in New Venture Teams: Affects as Signals, Emotional Diversity, and Valuation Effects in Crowdfunded Projects

Ownership concentration and firm valuation in a typical frontier market

This study investigates the valuation effect of concentrated ownership in a typical frontier market. Using an extensive sample of Vietnamese publicly listed firms, we find that the valuation effect is inconclusive before combined equity holdings reach a certain threshold beyond which market valuation increases exponentially with ownership. The latter log-linear effect can be interpreted as a more profound dominance of the monitoring incentives of large shareholders over the potential expropriation of minority shareholders at higher levels of concentration. Our finding reconciles the seemingly conflicting results of previous studies and contributes to understanding corporate governance practices in frontier markets.

Corporate social responsibility and market efficiency: Evidence from ESG and misvaluation measures

We study the impact of corporate social responsibility (CSR) on firm misvaluation in the US. Our results indicate that a firms Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) profile significantly affects valuation: an improvement of a firms CSR leads to a higher ratio of actual to true firm value. Analyzing the relation between ESG and misvaluation separately, we find that ESG expands existing overvaluation whereas it reduces undervalued firms’ deviation from the true value. We argue that both valuation effects are attributable to the worldwide trend of sustainable investing. Further analyses reveal a moderating role of market sentiment towards sustainability in the ESG-misvaluation relationship. Our findings suggest that firms CSR is indeed perceived as valuable by shareholders and supports stakeholder theorys view in considering CSR as beneficial.

Valuation effect of the extent and quality of corporate sustainability disclosure across sectors in Nigeria

Valuation effect of the extent and quality of corporate sustainability disclosure across sectors in Nigeria

The valuation effects of hotel mergers

This study aims to evaluate the merger effect of hotel mergers between 1981 and 2019 and assess which theoretical framework mergers in the lodging industry would conform. Previously, no work has been done about the nature of hotel mergers using the combined return, while this lack of thoroughness in assessing the motivation of those mergers has triggered different interpretations. The design of this study follows the traditional framework of an event study by assessing various types of cumulative abnormal returns around the announcement date. The key finding of this study suggests that the nature of hotel mergers strongly supports the synergy hypothesis. In order to explore the causal inferences of this result by bidder and target, an additional analysis was conducted by regressing the cumulative abnormal returns on accounting measures as well as merger- and hotel industry–specific variables. This panel data analysis showed that in a merger where both the bidder and target are affected, the amount of total debt, being engaged in the casino business, and whether the merger was involving a stock swap sent out positive signals to the market, whereby longer duration and higher deal value lifted the undervalued target. JEL Classifications: G34 (Mergers; Restructuring; Corporate Governance)

COVID-19, firm exposure, and firm value: A tale of two lockdowns

We study how a public health crisis affects the corporate sector at different phases of outbreak. Using an event study approach, we find significant valuation effects in a sample of Chinese listed firms following two symbolic events in the outbreak of COVID-19: (1) the lockdown of Hubei province; and (2) the containment of the disease in China and its spread to overseas. Market responded negatively (positively) to the first (second) event. Regression analysis further reveals that, following the first event, firms with Hubei (foreign) exposures earned significantly lower (higher) returns. Foreign exposures, however, had significantly negative effects on returns following the second event. The valuation effects of Hubei and foreign exposures also vary across firm ownership and industries. Our results indicate that, in a globalized world, firms' international status, internal networks and input-output linkages all play important roles in determining their exposures to the pandemic.

Underwriter Compensation, Marketing Effects, Investor Attention, and IPO Performance

After the systematic reform in the IPO market from 2005, underwriting spreads in China keep increasing and become even higher than that in the US market during the past decade. Besides, unlike “the seven percent solution” in the US, spreads in China demonstrate a significant cross-sectional variation. Using the sample of IPOs from 2005 to 2015, we examine the determinants and economic meaning of underwriting spreads in China. We find significant firm, issuance, and policy characteristics that explain the variation of underwriting spreads. Next, we extract abnormal components of spreads to further explore their valuation effects. We document that abnormal spreads can reflect promotional efforts performed by underwriters. Specifically, they are positively associated with institutional investor participation and offer price revision in the IPO process. Moreover, we show that promotional efforts lead to reductions in IPO underpricing. Overall, issuing companies benefit from the deregulation of underwriting services in the way that greater promotional efforts lead to less underpricing and more capital raised by IPO firms. However, government interventions and policy uncertainty can result in increased IPO listing costs in China.

IPO Valuation and IPO Inter-Industry Effects

This study examines the valuation effects of initial public offerings (IPOs) and intra-industry effects of IPOs in Turkey between 2010 and 2018. The purpose of this study is to find out whether initial public offerings are overvalued and whether they impact the pricing of industry peers. First, the valuation of IPOs is investigated. Price-to-value ratios of Turkish IPOs are compared with sector average ratios to determine whether IPOs are overvalued. Turkish IPOs are not overvalued against industry rivals’ price-to-value ratios based on sales and earnings-before-interest-taxes-depreciation-and-amortization (EBITDA) and earnings. Similarly, valuation based on price-to-value ratios is not related to initial pricing of IPOs. Second, the intra-industry effects of IPOs are investigated. Sector-adjusted abnormal returns of IPOs are compared to market-adjusted abnormal returns. The results are not affirmative: There is no statistically significant difference between the two abnormal returns. Turkish IPOs do trigger significant price declines on rival companies’ stocks. Altogether, the findings indicate that there is neither overvaluation of IPOs nor intra-industry effects over rival companies. Companies do not time the market based on industrial overvaluation. This may indicate market efficiency or lack of competition in the IPO market.

The value of tunneling: Evidence from master limited partnership formations

AbstractShareholders of publicly traded subsidiaries are potentially susceptible to expropriation (tunneling) by parent companies (Atanasov et al., 2010). A recent study suggests that this is particularly true among US master limited partnerships (MLPs), where there is often a substantial divergence between the control rights and cash‐flow rights of parent firms, through their general partner interests (Atanassov & Mandell, 2018). Although the negative impact of tunneling on controlled firms is documented in the literature, little is known about the valuation consequences of tunneling for shareholders of parent corporations. Changes to the MLP agency environment over the prior two decades—namely, the allowance of modifications to a fiduciary duty under Delaware law and the introduction of incentive distribution rights—have likely increased the incentive and opportunity for tunneling and provide a rich setting for addressing this question. I examine the effects of changing tunneling incentives on stock returns of parent corporations announcing the formation of MLPs and document significantly higher announcement period returns for MLP formations after these changes, amounting to roughly $188 million of additional value for shareholders of forming corporations, on average. Considered in concert with additional testing, this suggests that parent corporation shareholders benefit from the increased ability to tunnel MLP assets.

Valuation Effects of Norway’s Board Gender-Quota Law Revisited

We highlight the complexities in estimating the valuation effects of board gender quotas by critically revisiting studies of Norway’s pioneering board gender-quota law. We use the short-run event study of Ahern and Dittmar [Ahern KR, Dittmar A (2012) The changing of the boards: The impact on firm valuation of mandated female board representation. Quart. J. Econom. 127(1):137–197] to illustrate (1) the difficulties in attributing quota-related news to specific dates, (2) the need to account for contemporaneous cross-correlation of stock returns when judging the statistical significance of event-related abnormal stock returns, and (3) the fundamental difficulty of separating quota-induced valuation effects from the influences of firm characteristics and macroeconomic events such as the financial crisis. We provide new evidence suggesting that the valuation effect of Norway’s quota law was statistically insignificant. Overall, our evidence suggests that, at the time of the Norwegian quota, the supply of qualified female director candidates was high enough to avoid the negative consequences of the quota highlighted previously in the literature. This paper was accepted by Renee Adams, finance.

The valuation effects of unit versus share‐only IPOs

AbstractUnits consist of shares and warrants. Some firms issue units in initial public offerings (IPOs) after which warrant holders can exercise warrants and purchase shares from the issuer. Why do firms choose to issue units instead of only shares? I answer this question based on Merton's investor recognition model. Firms lacking pre‐IPO publicity can benefit from an increase in investor recognition. I find that unit firms have less pre‐IPO publicity than share‐only firms. Separate trading between warrants and shares and eventual exercise of the warrants will increase the number of shareholders and therefore firm value.