Vagus Nerve Stimulation Therapy Research Articles

Safety Profile of Abdominal Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Performed for Renal Disease Surveillance in Tuberous Sclerosis Complex Patients with Vagus Nerve Stimulation

IntroductionIndividuals with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) often present with refractory epilepsy and may be undergoing treatment with vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) to control seizures. Surveillance magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is necessary to monitor for the renal angiomyolipomas associated with TSC; however, MRI of the abdomen is not approved for patients withVNS therapy. We have many TSC patients with refractory epilelpsy who benefitted from VNS therapy, so we developed an MRI protocol that allows MRI of the abdomen to be performed in these patients to permit safe imaging of their kidneys. Here we report our results using this protocol. MethodsWe performed a retrospective review for all TSC patients seen from 01/01/1997 to 10/01/2022 at a single center to determine VNS implantation status. Patients with VNS implants and abdomen imaging performed according to the protocol for kidney surveillance were included. ResultsSixteen patients with 48 total MRIs of the abdomen were found: 34 (71%) scans were conducted under sedation and 14 (29%) without sedation. None of the patients reported any adverse effects (pain or discomfort). No instances of VNS dysfunction were noted when re-interrogating the device immediately after completion of the imaging studies or at later neurology follow-up appointments. All MRI scans were of good quality for interpretation. ConclusionAbdominal MRIs performed in typical VNS exclusion zones were not associated with adverse events or VNS dysfunction. We believe this protocol is safe and permits the best method for monitoring renal disease in TSC patients with VNS.

Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Neurologic Recovery

Neural plasticity, a potential mode of managing various neurologic diseases, can be modulated via bursts of neurotransmitter release, including norepinephrine and acetylcholine. One method to do so is by electrically stimulating the vagus nerve while performing a specific task. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has proven to be a viable intervention for conditions, including treatment-resistant epilepsy, depression, and, more recently, motor recovery after ischemic stroke. This article aims to explain the neurobiologic mechanism of VNS-induced cortical plasticity. It highlights both animal and human studies of VNS therapy, with a primary focus on recovery after stroke, traumatic brain injury, and spinal cord injury recovery. Furthermore, we discuss the long-term effects of VNS therapy, suggest potential solutions to overcome challenges encountered in previous studies, and elaborate on future directions in the field.

The effect of Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) on seizure control, cognitive function, and quality of life in individuals with drug-resistant epilepsy: A systematic review article.

To evaluate the effect of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) on seizure control, cognitive functions, and quality of life in individuals with drug-resistant epilepsy. An extensive search of electronic databases was carried out in order to carry out this systematic review. The databases Google Scholar, Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library were searched first to carryout gray literature. To reduce the quantity of pointless studies in the advanced search, the search is limited to "human studies" and "English language" publications only. Combining keywords and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms like ("Vagus Nerve Stimulation" OR "VNS") AND ("Epilepsy" OR "Seizure Control") AND ("Cognitive Function" OR "Quality of Life"). Studies that have been published up to November 30/2023 were included. The search strategy yielded a total of 392 relevant studies. The mean age of participant's ranges from 11 years to 33 years. The duration of follow-up ranging from 6 to 36 months. Eleven studies were included in the review. The mean≥50% response rate after VNS therapy was 56.94% ranged from 48.90% to 83.00%. Four and three studies provided information about Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory (QOLIE-31) and The Liverpool Seizure Severity Scale (LSSS) questionnaires respectively. Epilepsy is a chronic disease characterized by sudden abnormal discharge of brain neurons, which leads to transient brain dysfunction and the presence of spontaneous recurrent seizures. Vagus nerve stimulation has recently been proposed as a potential tool in the treatment of seizure, depressive symptoms, and cognitive impairments. There has been variation in the effects of VNS treatment on seizure control, cognitive functions, and quality of life among patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. So, a comprehensive review of exciting literature is important to see the pooled effect. Previous systematic review and meta-analysis papers were mostly randomized control trial type with specific diseases. The use of a wider variety of study designs than only randomized controlled trials is important. So, we included retrospective and prospective cohort studies in addition to randomized control trials. This enables a more thorough assessment of the connection between quality of life, cognitive function, and vagus nerve stimulation. In addition, the paper looks at a wide range of disease kinds and patterns. We have established a uniform and comprehensive approach throughout the selected studies by mandating the inclusion of all three crucial parameters: vagus nerve stimulation, cognitive function, and quality of life. This systematic review examined 392 relevant studies on vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) therapy, with participants ranging from 11 to 33 years old and follow-up durations of 6-36 months. Eleven studies were included, and the mean response rate after VNS therapy was 56.94%, ranging from 48.90% to 83.00%. The review also reported on quality of life and cognitive function, and seizure severity frequency result from several studies.

Disturbances of Interoception in Schizophrenia – Focus on Neuroimaging

Abstract: The current paper presents the most recent theoretical understanding of interoception (INTC) in light of the predictive processing framework and the Embodied Predictive Interoceptive Coding model and reviews recent experimental data on different interoceptive disturbances in schizophrenia (SCZ) such as lower interoceptive accuracy, nociceptive dysfunction reflected by reduced pain sensitivity, disturbed thermoregulation, impaired gastrointestinal regulation, cardiovascular and respiratory dysfunction, and immune disturbances. The immense clinical implications of these disturbances are discussed in the context of the high rates of morbidity and mortality in SCZ related to suicide and cardiac death. Next, the potential of INTC-related treatments is reviewed, and conclusions are made on the evidence for the use of vagus nerve stimulation, mindfulness-based interventions, and exercise therapy. The neuroimaging perspective is given in a brief account of the INTC-related findings in healthy individuals suggesting the right anterior insula and anterior cingulate cortex as key brain areas for interoceptive awareness, accuracy, and sensibility, by supporting higher-order representation and integration of visceral, and somatosensory interoception with exteroceptive information. In SCZ, on the other hand, neuroimaging research on specific interoceptive abilities is lacking but indirect evidence points to disrupted activation of major INTC network hubs. There is converging evidence of changes in these hubs in terms of both structure and function (volume reductions, aberrant activation, and connectivity). This narrative review identifies several gaps in contemporary INTC-related research in SCZ that need to be addressed in future experimental and clinical studies to elucidate the exact nature of the disturbances of interoceptive abilities in modalities other than cardioception; the interactions between different interoceptive modalities; the association between interoceptive abilities and other mental functions (such as emotion recognition and regulation, decision making, learning, memory, etc.); the efficacy of nonpharmacological and pharmacological INTC-based interventions; and the relation of disturbed interoceptive abilities with brain structure and function.

Baseline characteristics and predictors for early implantation of vagus nerve stimulation therapy in people with drug-resistant epilepsy: Observations from an international prospective outcomes registry (CORE-VNS).

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) Therapy is routinely indicated for people with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). We analyzed the baseline characteristics of individuals receiving the recently released VNS models and identified factors associated with early or late implantation. The Comprehensive Outcomes Registry of subjects with Epilepsy (CORE-VNS), a prospective observational study evaluating the clinical and psychosocial outcomes of VNS Therapy®, is following participants for up to 60 months after VNS implantation. In this analysis, we used Cox proportional hazards model to identify baseline characteristics associated with the time from diagnosis to first implantation. Of the 819 enrolled, 792 (96.7%) participants implanted with a VNS device were evaluated. 529 (64.6%) underwent the first implantation and 263 (32.1%) a re-implantation. Participants' median age at first implant was 24 years; 492 (62.1%) were ≥18 years old and 166 (20.3%) were < 12 years old. The average number of failed ASMs prior to VNS implantation was 7.1, and 145 (17.7%) had undergone previous epilepsy-related surgery. Epilepsy was classified as focal in 47.7% of participants, generalized in 16.1% and combined focal and generalized in 34.2%. Many of the participants (40.9%) had epilepsy of unknown etiology. The median time from diagnosis to first implantation was 10.33 years and was significantly shorter in participants with combined focal and generalized epilepsy compared to those with focal epilepsy alone, and in participants with genetic and immune epilepsy compared to those with unknown etiologies. In people with DRE, VNS Therapy is provided after multiple failures of ASMs and after failure of epilepsy surgery in one in six individuals. Time from diagnosis to first implantation is associated with epilepsy type and etiology, likely reflecting variable treatment pathways. Clearer guidelines on when and how non-drug therapies should be deployed in people with DRE related to different epilepsy factors are needed. Neuromodulation can be a very helpful treatment in people who have seizures that do not respond to medications. The most widely utilized neuromodulation therapy is vagus nerve stimulation (VNS). We present data from a large, global study to show that people use an average of seven anti-seizure medications before attempting VNS Therapy and that it takes about 10 years for people to get their first VNS implant. We advocate for clearer treatment guidelines on how and when to consider VNS Therapy in people with seizures that are resistant to medication.

Expert opinion on use of vagus nerve stimulation therapy in the management of pediatric epilepsy: a Delphi consensus study

Purpose: To provide consensus-based recommendations for use of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) therapy in the management of pediatric epilepsy. Methods: Delphi methodology with two rounds of online survey was used to build consensus. A steering committee developed 43 statements related to pediatric epilepsy and the use of VNS therapy, which were evaluated by a panel of 12 neurologists/neurosurgeons with expertise in pediatric epilepsy, who graded their agreement with each statement on a scale of 1 (“I do not agree at all”) to 5 (“I strongly agree”). For each statement, consensus was established if ≥70% of the agreement scores were 4 or 5 and <30% were 1 or 2 in the final survey. Results: Twenty-four statements regarding the need for seizure reduction in pediatric epilepsy, the recommended treatment algorithm, the benefits and safety of VNS therapy, management of side effects of VNS therapy, patient selection for VNS therapy, and the use, dosing, and titration of VNS therapy achieved consensus. VNS and other neuromodulation therapies should be considered for pediatric patients with drug-resistant epilepsy who are not candidates for resective surgery, or who do not remain seizure free after resective surgery. When VNS therapy is initiated, the target dose range should be achieved via the fastest and safest titration schedule for each patient. Scheduled programming can be helpful in dose titration. Conclusion: The expert consensus statements represent the panelists’ collective opinion on the best practice use of VNS therapy to optimize outcomes in the management of pediatric epilepsy.

Deep brain stimulation versus vagus nerve stimulation for the motor function of poststroke hemiplegia: study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial

IntroductionDeep brain stimulation (DBS) and vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) can improve motor function in patients with poststroke hemiplegia. No comparison study exists.Methods and analysisThis is a randomised, double-blind, controlled clinical...

Vagus Nerve Stimulation Paired With Rehabilitation for Chronic Stroke: Characterizing Responders.

Implantable vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) paired with volitional upper extremity rehabilitation can improve impairment and function among moderately to severely impaired, chronic stroke survivors. This study is a retrospective analysis of the in-clinic rehabilitation phase of the blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized pivotal VNS-REHAB trial to determine whether dosing parameters during in-clinic paired VNS therapy were associated with responder status and whether covariates might impact that determination. Data were limited to 53 participants in the active VNS group who had received VNS implants prior to undergoing 6weeks of in-clinic rehabilitation paired with VNS. Tasks were standardized across all participants. Dosing parameters included number of stimulations and task time. The primary outcome was the Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Assessment (FMA-UE), evaluated at the end of 6weeks (Post-1). Participants were classified a priori as responders based on an improvement of≥6 points on the FMA-UE from baseline to Post-1. Dosing parameters were not associated with FMA-UE responder status at the end of 6weeks. Covariates including age, gender, paretic hand, baseline severity, and chronicity of stroke were also not significant associations of response. While responders to VNS could be defined, therapy dosing and participant attributes did not provide greater specification for association of responder status. Limitations of this study include small sample size and non-linearity of the FMA-UE. Future studies will include reassessing responder categorization using more linear scales and examining stroke lesion characteristics to determine whether these measures are more sensitive to dosing parameters. for more insights from the authors (see the Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, available at: http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink ).

Quantifying Vagus Nerve Stimulation Outcomes in Multifocal Refractory Epilepsy: A Model Across Multiple Surgeries.

Objective This study aims to develop a quantifiable model for evaluating the outcomes of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) in patients with multifocal refractory epilepsy, particularly focusing on those who have undergone multiple surgeries. By adopting a patient-centered approach, the study seeks to provide a robust framework for assessing VNS efficacy across various patient demographics, including both adult and pediatric patients, and those with impaired cognitive and communicative abilities. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of 49 patients with multifocal refractory epilepsy who underwent at least one VNS surgery. The cohort was divided into two groups: adults (≥16 years) and a combined pediatric group that included patients under 16 years of age and patients with impaired cognitive and communicative skills. The Liverpool Seizure Severity Scale (LSSS) was used for adults, while the Hague Seizure Severity Scale (HASS) was employed for the pediatric group. Key outcome measures, including changes in seizure frequency, quality of life (QoL), number of hospitalizations, and other clinical metrics, were quantified using our proposed model. The iterative use of the mentioned scales was also assessed for validity by comparison with the Engel Outcome Scale (EOS). A total of 96 procedures were assessed. Results The results indicated a significant reduction in seizure severity post-surgery across both groups, as quantified by the LSSS for adults and HASS for pediatric and cognitively impaired patients. The model also demonstrated a consistent decrease in seizure frequency and an improvement in QoL metrics over successive surgeries. Minimal major side effects were reported, supporting the effectiveness of our quantification approach in capturing VNS outcomes. Conclusions This study introduces a novel, quantifiable model for evaluating VNS outcomes, providing a comprehensive tool for clinicians to assess the effectiveness of VNS in managing multifocal refractory epilepsy. By integrating multiple outcome measures into a cohesive framework, our model can aid in better understanding VNS therapy's impact and contribute to more informed clinical practice.

Consolidating roles of neuroimmune reflexes: specificity of afferent, central, and efferent signals in homeostatic immune networks.

Neural reflexes occupy a central role in physiological homeostasis. The vagus nerve is a major conduit for transmitting afferent and efferent signals in homeostatic reflex arcs between the body and the brain. Recent advances in neuroscience, immunology, and physiology have revealed important vagus nerve mechanisms in suppressing inflammation and treating rheumatoid arthritis and other autoimmune conditions. Numerous clinical trials indicate that there is significant benefit to vagus nerve stimulation therapy. Although many questions are still unanswered, it will be important, even necessary, to pursue answers that will be useful in guiding interventions to modulate immunological and physiological homeostasis.

Integrating the 5-SENSE Score for Patient Selection in Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Drug-Resistant Epilepsy.

Addressing the challenge of drug-resistant epilepsy, our study offers a novel perspective by retrospectively applying the 5-SENSE score, initially created for stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) planning, to evaluate its predictive value in patients undergoing vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) therapy. We conducted a comprehensive preoperative diagnostic work-up, including computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography-CT (PET-CT), video-electroencephalogram (video-EEG), and clinical semiology. We then stratified 76 patients into three groups - low, moderate, and high focality - based on the focality of the seizure-onset zone. Such stratification was made to check the scoring ability in predictingVNStherapy seizure reduction. Our findings demonstrate an association between the extent of focality at the seizure-onset zone and the effectiveness of VNS, which may help to define the role of the 5-SENSE score in patient selection for VNS. This high dispersion of responses in the group with high focality reinforces the idea that outcome estimation is difficult and argues for an individualized strategy in the treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy. A study at the level of the 5-SENSE score indicates the importance of detailed preoperative assessments that may better optimize selection for VNS therapy and further improve clinical outcomes.

Neural mechanisms responsible for vagus nerve stimulation-dependent enhancement of somatosensory recovery

Impairments in somatosensory function are a common and often debilitating consequence of neurological injury, with few effective interventions. Building on success in rehabilitation for motor dysfunction, the delivery of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) combined with tactile rehabilitation has emerged as a potential approach to enhance recovery of somatosensation. In order to maximize the effectiveness of VNS therapy and promote translation to clinical implementation, we sought to optimize the stimulation paradigm and identify neural mechanisms that underlie VNS-dependent recovery. To do so, we characterized the effect of tactile rehabilitation combined with VNS across a range of stimulation intensities on recovery of somatosensory function in a rat model of chronic sensory loss in the forelimb. Consistent with previous studies in other applications, we find that moderate intensity VNS yields the most effective restoration of somatosensation, and both lower and higher VNS intensities fail to enhance recovery compared to rehabilitation without VNS. We next used the optimized, moderate intensity to evaluate the mechanisms that underlie recovery. We find that moderate intensity VNS enhances transcription of Arc, a canonical mediator of synaptic plasticity, in the cortex, and that transcript levels were correlated with the degree of somatosensory recovery. Moreover, we observe that blocking plasticity by depleting acetylcholine in the cortex prevents the VNS-dependent enhancement of somatosensory recovery. Collectively, these findings identify neural mechanisms that subserve VNS-dependent somatosensation recovery and provide a basis for selecting optimal stimulation parameters in order to facilitate translation of this potential intervention.

A side-by-side comparison of fine-tuning options for treatment of medically refractory epilepsy: Antiseizure medications, vagus nerve stimulation and ketogenic diet therapies

There are many treatment options available for patients with medically refractory epilepsy including antiseizure medications, surgery, devices and ketogenic diet therapy. Ketogenic diet therapy has been shown to be a safe and effective treatment option in adult and pediatric patients. In order to obtain maximal clinical effectiveness and tolerability of any treatment option, adjustments are often necessary. This article outlines the “fine-tuning” options available for antiseizure medications, vagus nerve stimulation and ketogenic diet therapies and demonstrates that ketogenic diet therapies offer a wider array of personalizing and fine-tuning options.

Role of vagus nerve stimulation in epilepsy

ABSTRACT Introduction and purpose: Epilepsy affects 1% globally, with 2.6 to 6 million cases in Europe. 30-40% of the 50 million epilepsy patients globally don't respond to drugs. For those ineligible for surgery, Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) therapy offers an alternative for drug-resistant epilepsy and major depression. A brief description of the state of knowledge: Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) is a modern therapy using implanted or non-invasive devices to regulate nerve activity with controlled electrical impulses. Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) is effective for focal seizures, including simple partial seizures and auras. It also shows promise in reducing seizures in generalized tonic-clonic seizures and benefits patients with epileptic encephalopathies like Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. VNS effectively decreases both the frequency and duration of seizures in individuals contending with intractable epilepsy. The use of vagus nerve stimulation is generally a safe and well-tolerated form of treatment. VNS therapy improves psychomotor functions in patients with severe drug-resistant epilepsy, showing positive effects on cognitive aspects. The precise mechanism through which VNS affects the body is not fully understood, but it has demonstrated effectiveness, especially in cases of drug-resistant epilepsy. Conclusions: Extensive research backs Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) as an effective palliative for intractable epilepsy, reducing seizures. Yet, identifying specific patients who would benefit most from VNS treatment lacks clear criteria. Neuromodulation remains crucial for healthcare professionals handling drug-resistant epilepsy.

Evaluating the Efficacy of Vagus Nerve Stimulation across 'Minor' and 'Major' Seizure Types: A Retrospective Analysis of Clinical Outcomes in Pharmacoresistant Epilepsy.

Background: Evaluating the differential impact of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) therapy across various seizure types, our study explores its efficacy specifically in patients with categorized minor and major seizures. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study involving 76 patients with pharmacoresistant epilepsy treated at the University Emergency Hospital of Bucharest between 2021 and 2024. Seizures were classified as 'minor' (including focal-aware and non-motor/absence seizures) and 'major' (including focal to bilateral tonic-clonic and generalized motor seizures), based on modified International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) criteria. This classification allowed us to assess the response to VNS therapy, defined by a 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency at the 12-month follow-up. Results: Our findings reveal that major seizures respond more favorably to VNS therapy, significantly reducing both frequency and intensity. In contrast, minor seizures showed a less pronounced response in frequency reduction but noted improvements in neurocognitive functions, suggesting a nuanced benefit of VNS in these cases. Conclusion: The study underscores the importance of seizure type in determining the efficacy of VNS therapy, advocating for personalized treatment approaches based on seizure classification. This approach could potentially enhance clinical outcomes by tailoring VNS settings to specific seizure types, improving overall management strategies in pharmacoresistant epilepsy.

Vagus Nerve Stimulation Therapy in Epilepsy: An Overview of Technical and Surgical Method, Patient Selection, and Treatment Outcomes.

Epilepsy affects over 65 million people worldwide. One-third of people with epilepsy do not respond to medication and may benefit from surgery. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is the first neuromodulation therapy for the treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy. This method is used in combination with anti-seizure medications in adults and in the pediatric population. VNS has also been demonstrated to have benefits for some epilepsy comorbidities, such as depression, and can be used in combination with other neuromodulation therapies in epilepsy. The authors present an overview of VNS physiology, patient selection, surgery and risks, neuromodulation therapy, and application to epilepsy comorbidities.

Complications and Mortality Rate of Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Drug-Resistant Epilepsy.

The goal of this study is to evaluate the complications and mortality associated with vagus nerve stimulation (VNS). We retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients who underwent VNS implantation for the treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) between 2000 and 2023. The mean follow-up time was 10.6 years, ranging from three months to 22 years. In total, 55 adult and pediatric patients received VNS therapy with 117 procedures performed over 23 years. The most common early complications were hoarseness and cough which were reported in eight adult patients (6.8%). Four children with intellectual disability (ID) had infection (3.4%), eight patients had lead breakage (6.8%), and two had device migration (1.7%). Fourof all patients (7.3%) demonstrated late complications due to chronic nerve stimulation including vocal cord dysfunction, late-onset severe AV block, and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Three patients (5.5%) had VNS deactivated permanently due to complications and/or lack of efficacy. Two patients died from probable sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) with an incidence of 3.4/1000 person-years. VNS therapy is safe over long-term follow-up but not without risks. Most post-operative complications are minor and transient for adults. Children with ID tend to have infection and device migration. Late-onset cardiac complications and OSA can develop in some patients during VNS therapy and should not be overlooked. The SUDEP rate may decrease with VNS therapy over time.

Vagal Nerve Stimulation in the Pediatric Population and Correlation Between Family and Treatment Team Perspectives: Single-center Experience.

Vagal nerve stimulation (VNS) is an adjunctive therapy to pharmacological treatment in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of VNS therapy for seizure frequency reduction and improving quality of life (QOL) measures in children with refractory epilepsy and to evaluate the correlation between the perspectives of families and those of the treating team. This was a prospective cohort study conducted at Abha Maternity and Children's Hospital, Saudi Arabia, from 2018 to 2022. A total of 21 pediatric patients who completed one year of follow-up after VNS implantation were included. Patients were aged between 2 and 14 years, with a mean age of 8.14 ± 3.92; 11 (52.4%) patients were female. Family and physician assessments were collected blinded to each other using Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) scores and QOL assessments to evaluate the correlation between the families' and treating team's perspectives on VNS outcomes. In this study involving 21 patients with intractable epilepsy, VNS showed significant efficacy in reducing the frequency of seizures. VNS significantly reduced the number of seizures per week from a baseline median of 35 to a median of 0.25 at the end of the follow-up period, representing a dramatic reduction of 99.3% (p < 0.001). The number of emergency department visits per year decreased from a baseline median of 12 to a median of 2, a reduction of 83.3% (p < 0.001), whereas the number of hospital admissions per year decreased from a baseline median of 3 to a median of 1, a 66.7% decrease (p < 0.001). The number of antiepileptic medications taken decreased from a median of 4 to 3 (p < 0.001). Notably, 28.57% of the patients achieved complete seizure freedom, and 38% exhibited significant improvement, with at least 50% reduction in seizure frequency. Importantly, none of the patients experienced an escalation in seizure frequency following VNS treatment. The family and physician assessments showed varying degrees of alignment in perceptions, with "concentration" exhibiting a significant positive correlation (r = 0.498, p = 0.022), indicating noteworthy agreement, whereas verbal communication did not show a substantial correlation (r = -0.062, p = 0.791), indicating a divergence of views. VNS is a promising and well-tolerated therapy for individuals with intractable seizures, offering clinical benefits and potential enhancements in various aspects of QOL. The varying perceptions between family and physician assessments highlight the importance of considering multiple perspectives when evaluating treatment outcomes.

Ultrasound-driven piezoelectret-based nanogenerator stimulates vagus nerve for myocardial infarction treatment

Myocardial infarction (MI) stands as the predominant cause of morbidity and mortality within the spectrum of cardiovascular diseases, with an unfavorable long-term prognosis. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) emerges as a potential clinically significant intervention for alleviating myocardial remodeling after MI, offering promise as a therapeutic approach. However, challenges persist in addressing the fundamental issues of flexibility, miniaturization, and the long-term use of VNS devices. Here, we devised an implantable ultrasound-driven piezoelectret-based nanogenerator (UPN) as a wireless-powered and battery-free vagus nerve stimulator. The UPN with the features of flexibility and lightweight exhibited a maximum output of 10.68 V and 261 μA (peak to peak) under an ultrasonic probe setup at 700 mW cm−2. In the in vivo efficacy study, VNS therapy resulted in a notable improvement in cardiac function with the treatment of UPN, a 20.42 % enhancement in left ventricular ejection fraction and an 11.76 % increase in fractional shortening on the 28th day were realized. Concomitantly, inflammatory responses, myocardial fibrosis, and sympathetic nerve remodeling witnessed a significant reduction. Particularly noteworthy is the observed therapeutic effect linked to the inhibition of the IL-17 and TNF signaling pathways. In summary, this study introduces a novel strategy for nerve stimulation, offering a potential avenue for treating chronic inflammatory diseases.

Distal Versus Proximal Arm Improvement After Paired Vagus Nerve Stimulation Therapy After Chronic Stroke

ObjectiveTo evaluate differences in upper-extremity (UE) segment-specific (proximal or distal segment) recovery after vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) paired with UE rehabilitation (Paired-VNS) compared with rehabilitation with sham-VNS (Control). We also assessed whether gains in specific UE segments predicted clinically meaningful improvement. DesignThis study reports on a secondary analysis of Vagus nerve stimulation paired with rehabilitation for UE motor function after chronic ischemic stroke (VNS-REHAB), a randomized, triple-blinded, sham-controlled pivotal trial. A Rasch latent regression was used to determine differences between Paired-VNS and Controls for distal and proximal UE changes after in-clinic therapy and 3 months later. Subsequently, we ran a random forest model to assess candidate predictors of meaningful improvement. Each item of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) and Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) was evaluated as a predictor of response to treatment. SettingNineteen stroke rehabilitation centers in the USA and UK. ParticipantsDataset included 108 participants (N=108) with chronic ischemic stroke and moderate-to-severe UE impairments. InterventionsNot applicable. Main Outcome MeasuresFMA-UE and WMFT. ResultsDistal UE improvement was significantly greater in the Paired-VNS group than in Controls immediately after therapy (95% confidence interval, 0.27-0.73; P≤.001) and after 3 months (95% confidence interval, 0.16-0.75; P=.003). Both groups showed similar improvement in proximal UE at both time points. A subset of both distal and proximal items from the FMA-UE and WMFT were predictors of meaningful improvement. ConclusionsPaired-VNS improved distal UE impairment in chronic stroke to a greater degree than intensive rehabilitation alone. Proximal improvements were equally responsive to either treatment. Given that meaningful UE recovery is predicted by improvements across both proximal and distal segments, Paired-VNS may facilitate improvement that is otherwise elusive.