Adolescent Vaccination Research Articles

Indiana Parental Perceptions of the Acceptability of General and HPV-Specific State Vaccine Requirements.

State vaccine requirements are a tool for improving child and adolescent vaccination immunization coverage, but to be effective, parental buy-in is needed. The objective of this study was to assess the demographic, healthcare characteristics, and health beliefs associated with parental acceptance of general and HPV-specific state vaccine requirements. Indiana parents (N = 601) with children ages 11-17 years old completed a survey during March 2020.Results showed that 47.2% and 43.1% of parents believed there should always be general and HPV-specific state vaccine requirements, respectively. In multivariable analysis, higher odds of parental support for general state vaccine requirements were associated with being unsure whether HPV-associated cancer is a problem in the participant's county and having higher perceived benefits of HPV vaccines. Lower odds were associated with private insurance, having less than a bachelor's degree, and having less confidence in vaccines. In comparison, parents had higher odds of agreeing with HPV-specific state vaccine requirements if they reported higher interpersonal altruism and higher perceived benefits of HPV vaccines; they had lower odds if they were non-Hispanic White. Findings indicate that while similar percentages of parents agreed with general and HPV-specific state vaccine requirements, there were different characteristics associated with acceptance of each. Results can inform the development of tailored interventions for improving parental support for general and HPV-specific state vaccine requirements.

High levels of antibodies 6 months after COVID-19 vaccination in children with severe chronic diseases: A prospective longitudinal case series.

High levels of antibodies 6 months after COVID-19 vaccination in children with severe chronic diseases: A prospective longitudinal case series.

Immunogenicity, effectiveness, and safety of COVID-19 vaccines among children and adolescents aged 2-18years: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, there is an urgent need for safe and effective COVID-19 vaccines to protect children and adolescents. This study aims to provide scientific evidence and recommendations for the application of COVID-19 vaccines in children and adolescents by analyzing the latest studies. We systematically searched MEDLINE (accessed through PubMed), Embase, and Web of Science from January 1, 2020, to October 8, 2022. Eligible clinical trials, cohort studies, case‒control studies, and cross-sectional studies with extractable data were included in immunogenicity, effectiveness, and safety analyses. According to the heterogeneity, we chose a fixed-effect model (when I2 ≤ 50) or a random-effects model (when I2 > 50) to pool effect values. A total of 88 articles were included. The seroconversion rates after the first, second, and third doses of the vaccines were 86.10%, 96.52%, and 99.87%, respectively. After the first and second doses, vaccine effectiveness (VE) against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection was 42.87% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 27.09%-58.65%] and 63.33% (95% CI = 52.09%-74.56%), respectively. After the first and second doses, VE against COVID-19 was 60.65% (95% CI = 44.80%-76.50%) and 75.77% (95% CI = 63.99%-87.56%), respectively. VE against hospitalization due to COVID-19 after the first and second doses was 72.74% (95% CI = 51.48%-94.01%) and 82.78% (95% CI = 75.78%-89.78%), respectively. The most common adverse events were injection site pain, fatigue/asthenia/tiredness, headache, myalgia/muscle pain, and chills. The incidence rate of myocarditis or pericarditis was 2.42/100,000 people. In addition, the subgroup analysis showed that children aged ≤ 5years had the lowest incidence of adverse events, and the incidence rate of adverse events was higher for mRNA vaccines than for inactivated vaccines. COVID-19 vaccines have good immunogenicity, effectiveness, and safety among children and adolescents. We recommend that children and adolescents be vaccinated as soon as possible to protect them and slow the spread of COVID-19.

A case for vaccinating adolescent girls for protection against COVID-19 during pregnancy and childbirth in resource-limited settings

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has had severe implications worldwide, including increased adverse maternal and neonatal health outcomes. Vaccination is one way of protecting against these adverse health outcomes. However, in some low-resource settings, vaccine inequity has led to poor uptake of COVID-19 vaccination. There are very high rates of adolescent pregnancy in low-resource settings, which are likely to become even higher as we begin to see the full effects of COVID-19 lockdown measures, including school closures. Although the benefits of COVID-19 vaccination in adolescents are debated, we propose that adolescent girls should be prioritised in COVID vaccination roll out in low-resource settings. This is to provide protection from severe COVID-19 disease in pregnancy, preventing adverse maternal and neonatal health outcomes.

Cost Effectiveness of Implementing a Universal Birth Hepatitis B Vaccination Program in Ontario.

The World Health Organization recommends a universal hepatitis B vaccination within the first 24 h of birth. However, hepatitis B vaccines are given during adolescence in many jurisdictions including in Ontario, Canada. The objective of this study was to assess the cost effectiveness of shifting the hepatitis B vaccination timing from adolescence to birth. A state-transition model of 18 health states representing the natural history of acute and chronic hepatitis B was developed to conduct a cost-utility analysis. Most input parameters were obtained from the Canadian literature or publicly available provincial data. The model followed a lifetime model time horizon with health outcomes and costs being discounted at 1.5% annually. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to test the robustness of the model. Analyses were conducted from a public-payer perspective with all costs adjusted to 2021 Canadian dollars. Hepatitis B vaccination in newborns dominated the current strategy of adolescent vaccination. The probabilistic analysis showed that the newborn strategy was cost effective in 100% of the iterations at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000/quality-adjusted life-year and cost saving in 79.39% of the iterations. A microsimulation projected that a newborn vaccination may lead to reductions in cases by 16.1% in acute hepatitis B, 43.2% in chronic hepatitis B, 48.2% in hepatocellular carcinoma, and 51.9% in hepatitis B liver-related death. Our analysis suggests that changing the age of the hepatitis B vaccination recommendation from adolescent to newborn is cost effective and mostly a cost-saving strategy. Newborn vaccination may lead to cost and health benefits while aligning with best available evidence and guidance from the World Health Organization.

COVID-19 Adult, Childhood, and Adolescent Vaccination Coverage Among Military and Civilian Families, United States.

The COVID-19 pandemic affected the lives of military members and their families, with over 400,000 cases among U.S. military members since the start of the pandemic. The objective of this study is to examine and compare COVID-19 vaccination coverage of military members (active duty and Reserve/National Guard) and their family members (spouses, children, and adolescents) to that of their civilian counterparts using a large, nationally representative study. Data from March 2 to May 9, 2022, of the Household Pulse Survey were analyzed for this study (n = 207,758). COVID-19 vaccination status (≥1 dose) was assessed for military members and their spouses, civilians, and children (aged 5 to 11 and 12 to 17 years) from both military and civilian families. Differences between military members, spouses, and their children compared to civilian adults and children were assessed using chi-squared and t-tests. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the association between military status and COVID-19 vaccination after controlling for sociodemographic characteristics. Reasons for not getting vaccinated for adults and children from military and civilian families were assessed. Compared to civilian adults and adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics, military members were more likely to be vaccinated (adjusted prevalence ratio = 1.07, 95% CI: 1.01-1.13). Vaccination coverage between active duty and civilian adults differed by subgroups. For example, among military members, COVID-19 vaccination coverage decreased with increasing age, from 87.5% among those aged 18 to 39 years to 56.0% among those aged ≥55 years. In contrast, among civilian adults, vaccination coverage increased with increasing age, from 78.5% among those aged 18 to 39 years to 91.2% among those aged ≥55 years. Military members were also less likely to be vaccinated than their civilian counterparts if they were Hispanic (68.5% vs. 85.2%), had a Bachelor's degree or higher (87.5% vs. 93.8%), or had $100,000 or more in annual household income (76.7% vs. 92.6%). Military members who had anxiety or depression (70.1%) were less likely to be vaccinated compared to civilian adults (84.4%). Military spouses (74.4%) were less likely to be vaccinated than civilian adults (84.7%). Children and adolescents who were homeschooled (35.1%) or had no preventive checkups in the past year (32.4%) were less likely to be vaccinated than their respective counterparts (52.5% and 54.0%, respectively). Military adults compared to civilian adults were more likely to report lack of trust in the government (47.5% vs. 35.2%) and, for children/adolescents, the belief that the vaccine is not needed (42.1% vs. 28.1%) as reasons for non-vaccination. Despite vaccine mandates and the high vaccination coverage found among the majority of military members, disparities exist in some subgroups. Educational interventions and increased communication from trusted leaders, such as medical providers and commanders, could increase confidence in vaccines among military families. Ensuring access to vaccines, empowering healthcare providers to recommend vaccines, and reminding parents of missed vaccinations or preventive checkups can help improve vaccination coverage. Achieving high vaccination among military members and their families is essential in protecting those in the forefront of the pandemic response and promoting the safety and security of the nation.

The Impact of Social Determinants of Health on Meningococcal Vaccination Awareness, Delivery, and Coverage in Adolescents and Young Adults in the United States: A Systematic Review.

Vaccines remain a fundamental intervention for preventing illness and death. In the United States, suboptimal vaccine uptake in adolescents and young adults has been observed for meningococcal conjugate (MenACWY) and serogroup B meningococcal (MenB) vaccines, particularly among marginalized communities, despite current recommendations by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. A systematic literature search was conducted in the MEDLINE and MEDLINE In-Process, Embase, Cochrane, PsychInfo, and CINAHL databases to identify both drivers of, and barriers to, MenACWY and MenB vaccine uptake in adolescents and young adults. A total of 34 of 46 eligible studies that presented outcomes stratified by race/ethnicity, geography, and socioeconomic status were selected for review. Results showed MenACWY and MenB vaccination coverage in adolescents and young adults is impacted by racial/ethnic, socioeconomic, and geographic disparities. Gaps also exist in insurance for, or access to, these vaccines in adolescents and young adults. Moreover, there was variability in the understanding and implementation of the shared decision-making recommendations for the MenB vaccine. Disease awareness campaigns, increased clarity in accessing all meningococcal vaccines, and further research on the relationships between measures of marginalization and its impact on vaccine coverage in adolescents and young adults are needed to reduce the incidence of severe infections.

Pertussis epidemiology in Canada, 2005-2019.

Pertussis, also known as whooping cough, is an endemic vaccine-preventable disease that affects the respiratory tract and is caused by the bacterium Bordetella pertussis. Between 1999 and 2004, the adolescent booster dose of pertussis was introduced across Canada. This report describes the epidemiology of pertussis in Canada from 2005 to 2019, the period after adolescent acellular vaccination was recommended. We analyzed pertussis incidence by year, age groups, sex and geographic region using national surveillance data from the Canadian Notifiable Disease Surveillance System. Hospitalization data from the Discharge Abstract Database was used to investigate pertussis hospitalizations by sex and age. Deaths from pertussis were explored using Statistics Canada's vital statistics data. Vaccination coverage data was gathered from the 2019 Childhood National Immunization Coverage Survey and 2018-2019 Seasonal Influenza Vaccination Coverage Survey. Between 2005 and 2019, there were a total of 33,481 pertussis cases with the average annual incidence rate of 6.4 cases per 100,000 population. The highest average age-specific incidence rate was among infants under one year of age (n=68.7 cases per 100,000 population). There were a total of 1,593 pertussis hospitalizations; nearly 80% of these hospitalizations were infants under one year of age. Hospitalization rates were 8.2 times higher in infants three months or younger compared to infants four to 11 months of age. There were 17 deaths; all among infants under one year of age. The highest morbidity and fatality of pertussis were among infants under one year of age. It is important to take measures to reduce transmission to infants who are too young to be vaccinated. Increasing vaccine coverage in children and pregnant women are important to reduce the burden of disease.

Validation of the Chinese Versions of the Carolina Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Immunization Attitudes and Beliefs Scale and HPV and Vaccination Knowledge Scales

Background: It is vital to address parents’ human papillomavirus (HPV) knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs to reduce vaccine hesitancy and increase adolescent HPV vaccination rates. Objective: To validate the Chinese versions of the Carolina HPV Immunization Attitudes and Beliefs Scale (CHIAS), HPV Knowledge scale (GK23), and Vaccination Knowledge Scale (VK9) and to investigate parents’ current perspectives on HPV vaccination. Methods: Convenience sampling was used to recruit 195 Chinese parents. The CHIAS, GK23, and VK9 were translated into Chinese and content validity was established. The structural validity of the CHIAS was assessed by confirmatory factor analysis, and internal consistency of the scales was assessed by Cronbach’s alpha (α) for the CHIAS-C and by Kuder-Richardson 20 for the GK23 and VK9. Results: Internal consistency of all 3 scales was acceptable, with Cronbach’s α for the 4 domains of the CHIAS-C ranging from 0.68 to 0.85, and Kuder-Richardson 20 score of 0.88 and 0.75 for the GK23 and VK9, respectively. The 4-factor structure of the CHIAS-C was found to be a good fit to the data and its structural validity was established. Conclusions: The Chinese versions of the CHIAS, GK23, and VK9 are valid and reliable instruments to evaluate attitudes, beliefs, and knowledge of HPV and HPV vaccination among Chinese-speaking parents. Implications for Practice: These instruments may facilitate investigation of parents’ views toward HPV vaccination and inform the design of targeted interventions to address vaccine hesitancy. What Is Foundational: Parents’ knowledge and attitudes are determining factors in vaccination decision-making and should be considered in HPV vaccine promotion efforts.

Digital Health Interventions to Improve Adolescent HPV Vaccination: A Systematic Review.

Digital technologies are being increasingly utilized in healthcare to provide pertinent and timely information for primary prevention, such as vaccination. This study aimed to conduct a systematic review to describe and assess current digital health interventions to promote HPV vaccination among adolescents and parents of adolescents, and to recommend directions for future interventions of this kind. Using appropriate medical subject headings and keywords, we searched multiple databases to identify relevant studies published in English between 1 January 2017 and 31 July 2022. We screened and selected eligible studies for inclusion in the final analysis. We reviewed a total of 24 studies, which included interventions using text messages (4), mobile apps (4), social media and websites (8), digital games (4), and videos (4). The interventions generally improved determinants of HPV vaccination, such as HPV-related knowledge, vaccine-related conversations, and vaccination intentions. In particular, text message and social media interventions targeted improved vaccine uptake behaviors, but little meaningful change was observed. In conclusion, digital health interventions can cost-effectively provide education about HPV vaccination, offer interactive environments to alleviate parental vaccine hesitancy, and ultimately help adolescents engage in HPV vaccine uptake.

Subclinical myocardial assessment after BNT162b2 messenger RNA COVID-19 vaccination in adolescents with chronic heart disease: a speckle-tracking echocardiography study.

Case reports of the development of perimyocarditis in adolescents and young adults after BNT162b2 messenger RNA (mRNA) COVID-19 vaccination have raised concerns about the cardiac side effects of the vaccine. The aim of the study was to evaluate clinical follow-up and subclinical myocardial function after mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in adolescents with chronic heart disease. Forty-one adolescents aged 12-18 who were followed up at paediatric cardiology clinic between December 2021 and May 2022, and who had received two doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA vaccine were included in the study. The patients were evaluated five times in total - before the vaccination, one week after receiving the first dose, one month after receiving the first dose, one week after receiving the second dose, and one month after receiving the second dose. Cardiac assessment for all patients included an electrocardiogram, transthoracic echocardiography, and two-dimensional speckle-tracking strain echocardiography for left ventricular subclinical myocardial function. The mean age of the adolescents was 16.2 ± 1.5 years, and 56% (n = 23) were male. There was no statistically significant difference in patients' echocardiographic measurements including left ventricular global longitudinal strain and electrocardiogram parameters including PR, QRS, and QTc intervals through the follow-up. Seven patients reported cardiac complaints at post-vaccination follow-up visits, but laboratory and echocardiographic evidence of cardiac involvement was not observed. Based on the results of our study, the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine did not cause impairment in subclinical myocardial function assessed by speckle-tracking echocardiography in adolescents with chronic heart disease.

COVID-19 Vaccination in Pediatrics: Was It Valuable and Successful?

The mass vaccination of children against coronavirus 2019 disease (COVID-19) has been frequently debated. The risk-benefit assessment of COVID-19 vaccination versus infection in children has also been debated. This systematic review looked for answers to the question "was the vaccination of our children valuable and successful?". The search strategy of different articles in the literature was based on medical subject headings. Screening and selection were based on inclusion/exclusion criteria. The search results revealed that the majority of the reported adverse events after COVID-19 vaccination in pediatrics were mild to moderate, with few being severe. Injection site discomfort, fever, headache, cough, lethargy, and muscular aches and pains were the most prevalent side effects. Few clinical studies recorded significant side effects, although the majority of these adverse events had nothing to do with vaccination. In terms of efficacy, COVID-19 disease protection was achieved in 90-95% of cases for mRNA vaccines, in 50-80% of cases for inactivated vaccines, and in 58-92% of cases for adenoviral-based vaccines in children and adolescents. Based on available data, COVID-19 immunizations appear to be safe for children and adolescents. Furthermore, multiple studies have proven that different types of vaccines can provide excellent protection against COVID-19 in pediatric populations. The efficacy of vaccines against new SARS-CoV-2 variants and the reduction in vaccine-related long-term adverse events are crucial for risk-benefit and cost-effectiveness assessments; therefore, additional safety studies are required to confirm the long-term safety and effectiveness of vaccinations in children.

The potential public health impact of adolescent 4CMenB vaccination on Neisseria gonorrhoeae infection in England: a modelling study

IntroductionDiagnoses of gonorrhoea in England rose by 26% between 2018 and 2019. Recent evidence that a vaccine against meningococcal B disease currently offered to infants in the UK (4CMenB) could additionally protect (with 31% efficacy) against gonorrhoea has led to renewed hope for a vaccine. A Phase 2 proof-of-concept trial of 4CMenB vaccination against gonorrhoea in adults is currently underway.ObjectivesTo investigate the potential public health impact of adolescent gonorrhoea vaccination in England, considering different implementation strategies.MethodsWe developed a deterministic transmission-dynamic model of gonorrhoea infection among heterosexual 13–64-year-olds stratified by age, sex and sexual activity. We explored the impact of a National Immunisation Programme (NIP) among 14-year-olds for a vaccine with 31% efficacy, 6 years’ duration of protection, and 85% uptake. We also explored how impact might change for varying efficacy (20–50%) and uptake (75–95%), the addition of a catch-up programme, the use of boosters, and varying duration of protection.ResultsAn NIP against gonorrhoea could lead to 50,000 (95% credible interval, CrI 31,000-80,000) and 849,000 (95%CrI 476,000-1,568,000) gonorrhoea infections being averted over 10 and 70 years, respectively, in England, for a vaccine with 31% efficacy and 85% uptake. This is equivalent to 25% (95%CrI 17–33%) of heterosexual infections being averted over 70 years. Vaccine impact is predicted to increase over time and be greatest among 13–18-year-olds (39% of infections 95%CrI 31–49% averted) over 70 years. Varying vaccine efficacy and duration of protection had a noticeable effect on impact. Catch-up and booster vaccination increased the short- and long-term impact, respectively.ConclusionsA partially-effective vaccine against gonorrhoea infection, delivered to 14-year-olds alongside the MenACWY vaccine, could have an important population impact on gonorrhoea. Catch-up and booster vaccination could be considered alongside cohort vaccination to increase impact.

When schools were open for in-person teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic - the nordic experience on control measures and transmission in schools during the delta wave

BackgroundExtensive measures to control spread of SARS-CoV-2 have led to limited access to education for millions of children and adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic. Education and access to schools is vital for children and adolescents’ learning, health, and wellbeing. Based on high vaccine uptake and low incidence levels, the Nordic countries (Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden) decided to start the academic year 2021/22 with schools open for in-person teaching and moderate mitigation measures. We describe trends in SARS-CoV-2 infections and vaccination coverage among students during the first 12 weeks of the fall semester.MethodsIn this multinational, retrospective, observational study, we have used surveillance and registry data from each of the Nordic countries to describe vaccine uptake (≥12 years), infection incidence (whole population) and transmission of SARS-CoV-2 among students. The study period, week 30 to 41 (Jul 26th – Oct 17th), represents the autumn semester from immediately before school started until fall break. In addition, we collected information on mitigation measures applied by the respective countries.ResultsThere were slight variations between the countries regarding existing infection prevention and control (IPC) measures, testing strategies and vaccination start-up among adolescents. All countries had high vaccine uptake in the adult population, while uptake varied more in the younger age groups. Incidence in the school-aged population differed between countries and seemed to be influenced by both vaccine uptake and test activity. Infection clusters among school-aged children were described for Denmark and Norway, and the number of clusters per week reflected the incidence trend of the country. Most events consisted of only 1–2 cases. Larger clusters appeared more frequently in the higher grades in Norway and in lower grades in Denmark.ConclusionData from the Nordic countries indicate that vaccination of adults and adolescents, in addition to mitigation measures, enabled full in-person learning. As SARS-CoV-2 infection does not represent a severe medical risk for most children as previously thought, measures targeting this group should be carefully adjusted and kept at a minimum. Our data add to the evidence on incidence and transmission of SARS-CoV-2 among students in schools open for in-person teaching, and may be valuable for decision makers worldwide.

COVID-19 coronavirus infection in children: Clinical presentation, diagnosis, vaccination, and treatment

In late 2019, a new subtype of coronavirus named Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2) rapidly spread around the world, causing a global pandemic. Initially, the proportion of confirmed cases among children was relatively small, and it was believed that children were rarely infected. Subsequent observations have shown that in children and adolescents, the infection is either asymptomatic or paucisymptomatic, and therefore the true incidence is underestimated due to the lack of testing. The article systematizes the results of studies on the prevalence, diagnosis, clinical features, vaccination, and treatment of children with a new coronavirus infection COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2. The SARS-CoV-2 positivity rate throughout the peak of the pandemic in children was low compared to adults. Children are not only less likely to become infected with the virus, but they also endure the infection more easily than adults. The mortality rate in children with COVID-19 was <0.5%. In most children, infection is either asymptomatic or paucisymptomatic. Vaccination of children and adolescents is recommended mainly to achieve herd immunity in all age groups. However, there are no convincing data on the duration of the immune response, the level of the required protective antibody titer, as well as on the long-term side effects of vaccination due to the insufficient follow-up period and the uncertainty of the immune response criteria. As information is accumulated on the viral load of children and adolescents, their role in the transmission of the virus, diagnostic approaches in this age group are optimized. The effectiveness of the treatment was tested on patients admitted to the hospital, and recommendations for treatment were developed. Currently, global research efforts are focused on the protection of particularly vulnerable children, the prospects for total childhood vaccination, its effectiveness and safety.

Comparing the pertussis antibody levels of healthy children immunized with four doses of DTap-IPV/Hib (Pentaxim) combination vaccine and DTaP vaccine in Quzhou, China.

Despite the high coverage of pertussis vaccines in high-income countries, pertussis resurgence has been reported in recent years, and has stimulated interest in the effects of vaccines and vaccination strategies. Immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies against pertussis toxoid (PT), filamentous hemagglutinin (FHA), and pertactin (PRN) after immunization with four doses of co-purified or component vaccines were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Serological data of PT-IgG geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) over time since vaccination were used to fit the mathematical models. A total of 953 children were included in this study; 590 participants received four doses of the component acellular vaccine and 363 participants received four doses of the co-purified acellular vaccine. The GMCs and the seropositivity rate of pertussis IgG were significantly influenced by the production methods, and the immunogenicity of the component acellular vaccine was superior to that of the co-purified acellular vaccine. The fitted mathematical models for the component acellular vaccine and the co-purified acellular vaccine were Y=91.20e-0.039x and Y=37.71x-0.493, respectively. The initial GMCs of the component acellular vaccine was higher than that of the co-purified acellular vaccine, but both were similar at 72 months after immunization. Pertussis IgG levels waned over time after four doses of acellular pertussis vaccine, regardless of whether component or co-purified vaccine was used. The development and promotion of component acellular pertussis vaccines should be accelerated in China, and booster doses of pertussis vaccine in adolescents, adults, and pregnant women should be employed.

Racial and Ethnic Differences in COVID-19 Vaccination Coverage Among Children and Adolescents Aged 5-17 Years and Parental Intent to Vaccinate Their Children - National Immunization Survey-Child COVID Module, United States, December 2020-September 2022.

Some racial and ethnic groups are at increased risk for COVID-19 and associated hospitalization and death because of systemic and structural inequities contributing to higher prevalences of high-risk conditions and increased exposure (1). Vaccination is the most effective prevention intervention against COVID-19-related morbidity and mortality*; ensuring more equitable vaccine access is a public health priority. Differences in adult COVID-19 vaccination coverage by race and ethnicity have been previously reported (2,3), but similar information for children and adolescents is limited (4,5). CDC analyzed data from the National Immunization Survey-Child COVID Module (NIS-CCM) to describe racial and ethnic differences in vaccination status, parental intent to vaccinate their child, and behavioral and social drivers of vaccination among children and adolescents aged 5-17 years. By August 31, 2022, approximately one third (33.2%) of children aged 5-11 years, more than one half (59.0%) of children and adolescents aged 12-15 years, and more than two thirds (68.6%) of adolescents aged 16-17 years had received ≥1 COVID-19 vaccine dose. Vaccination coverage was highest among non-Hispanic Asian (Asian) children and adolescents, ranging from 63.4% among those aged 5-11 years to 91.8% among those aged 16-17 years. Coverage was next highest among Hispanic or Latino (Hispanic) children and adolescents (34.5%-77.3%). Coverage was similar for non-Hispanic Black or African American (Black), non-Hispanic White (White), and non-Hispanic other race† or multiple race (other/multiple race) children and adolescents aged 12-15 and 16-17 years. Among children aged 5-11 years, coverage among Black children was lower than that among Hispanic, Asian, and other/multiple race children. Enhanced public health efforts are needed to increase COVID-19 vaccination coverage for all children and adolescents. To address disparities in child and adolescent COVID-19 vaccination coverage, vaccination providers and trusted messengers should provide culturally relevant information and vaccine recommendations and build a higher level of trust among those groups with lower coverage.

Development of an algorithm for finding pertussis episodes in a population-based electronic health record database

ABSTRACT While tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccines for adolescents and adults were licensed in 2005 and immunization strategies proposed, the burden of pertussis in this population remains under-recognized mainly due to atypical disease presentation, undermining efforts to optimize protection through vaccination. We developed a machine learning algorithm to identify undiagnosed/misdiagnosed pertussis episodes in patients diagnosed with acute respiratory disease (ARD) using signs, diseases and symptoms from clinician notes and demographic information within electronic health-care records (Optum Humedica repository [2007–2019]). We used two patient cohorts aged ≥11 years to develop the model: a positive pertussis cohort (4,515 episodes in 4,316 patients) and a negative pertussis (ARD) cohort (4,573,445 episodes and patients), defined using ICD 9/10 codes. To improve contrast between positive pertussis and negative pertussis (ARD) episodes, only episodes with ≥7 symptoms were selected. LightGBM was used as the machine learning model for pertussis episode identification. Model validity was determined using laboratory-confirmed pertussis positive and negative cohorts. Model explainability was obtained using the Shapley additive explanations method. The predictive performance was as follows: area under the precision–recall curve, 0.24 (SD, 7 × 10−3); recall, 0.72 (SD, 4 × 10−3); precision, 0.012 (SD, 1 × 10−3); and specificity, 0.94 (SD, 7 × 10−3). The model applied to laboratory-confirmed positive and negative pertussis episodes had a specificity of 0.846. Predictive probability for pertussis increased with presence of whooping cough, whoop, and post-tussive vomiting in clinician notes, but decreased with gastrointestinal bleeding, sepsis, pulmonary symptoms, and fever. In conclusion, machine learning can help identify pertussis episodes among those diagnosed with ARD.

Safety and immunogenicity of SCB-2019, an adjuvanted, recombinant SARS-CoV-2 trimeric S-protein subunit COVID-19 vaccine in healthy 12–17 year-old adolescents

ABSTRACT We previously demonstrated the efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccine candidate, SCB-2019, in adults in the SPECTRA phase 2/3 efficacy study. We extended the study to include 1278 healthy 12–17-year-old adolescents in Belgium, Colombia, and the Philippines who received either two doses of SCB-2019 or placebo 21 days apart, to assess immunogenicity as neutralizing antibodies against prototype SARS-CoV-2 and variants of concern, and safety and reactogenicity as solicited and unsolicited adverse events with a comparator group of young adults (18–25 years). In participants with no evidence of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection SCB-2019 immunogenicity in adolescents was non-inferior to that in young adults; respective geometric mean neutralizing titers (GMT) against prototype SARS-CoV-2 14 days after the second vaccination were 271 IU/mL (95% CI: 211–348) and 144 IU/mL (116–178). Most adolescents (1077, 84.3%) had serologic evidence of prior SAR-CoV-2 exposure at baseline; in these seropositive adolescents neutralizing GMTs increased from 173 IU/mL (135–122) to 982 IU/mL (881–1094) after the second dose. Neutralizing titers against Delta and Omicron BA SARS-CoV-2 variants were also increased, most notably in those with prior exposure. SCB-2019 vaccine was well tolerated with generally mild or moderate, transient solicited and unsolicited adverse events that were comparable in adolescent vaccine and placebo groups except for injection site pain – reported after 20% of SCB-2019 and 7.3% of placebo injections. SCB-2019 vaccine was highly immunogenic against SARS-CoV-2 prototype and variants in adolescents, especially in those with evidence of prior exposure, with comparable immunogenicity to young adults. Clinical trial registration: EudraCT 2020–004272–17; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04672395.

Feminized vaccine? Parents’ attitudes toward HPV vaccination of adolescents in Poland: A representative study

ABSTRACT In 2023, the process of gradually introducing universal, free HPV vaccination into the vaccination program for children in Poland began. For this reason, the attitudes of parents of adolescents toward these vaccinations were examined in this study. The survey was conducted among 360 parents of children (girls and boys) aged 9–15. To achieve the best possible representativeness of the sample, parents were selected for the survey using a random-quota method. The survey was carried out using the CATI. The surveyed parents declared a high level of knowledge about HPV and awareness of HPV vaccination (74.2% of parents had heard of HPV, and 61.4% had heard of the HPV vaccine). The study showed a statistically significant relationship between parents’ education and knowledge of HPV infection – the higher the parent’s (mother or father) education, the higher the declared knowledge. Education was also a statistically significant factor influencing the declaration of vaccinating a child against HPV. In addition to parental education, the gender of the child was also a significant factor influencing willingness to vaccinate against HPV. Parents of boys were significantly more likely – than parents of girls – to declare that they would not vaccinate their sons against HPV. A significant factor influencing declarations to vaccinate against HPV was the child’s vaccination against COVID-19. The study results indicate a strong correlation between parental education and parental knowledge and attitudes about HPV and the HPV vaccine.