Vaccination Of Cancer Patients Research Articles

Influenza Vaccination in Cancer Patients Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

The safety and efficacy of influenza vaccination is not well-studied in cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed aiming to summarize available data regarding influenza vaccination in ICI-treated cancer patients. Peer-reviewed studies or nonpeer-reviewed conference abstracts including ICI-treated cancer patients who received at least 1 dose of influenza vaccine were deemed eligible. A systematic search in PubMed/EMBASE was performed until October 26, 2021. Endpoints of interest included mortality as the primary outcome and secondary safety outcomes such as the incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Twenty-five studies were included in the systematic review, among which 9 were included in the meta-analysis. Meta-analysis of 3 studies (n=589, weighted age 64 y, men 61%, influenza vaccinated 32%) showed pooled odds ratio for death in influenza vaccinated versus nonvaccinated patients at 1.25 [(95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.81-1.92), P=non significant (NS)]. Meta-analysis of 6 studies studies (n=1285, weighted age 60 y, men 59%, influenza vaccinated 48%) showed pooled odds ratio for any irAEs in influenza vaccinated versus nonvaccinated patients at 0.82 [95% CI: 0.63-1.08, P=NS]. Similar results were observed in sensitivity analyses for serious irAEs, as well as when only peer-reviewed studies were included. Influenza vaccination appears to be a safe and reasonable intervention for cancer patients receiving ICIs. Most data are derived from retrospective observational studies. Randomized studies are needed to provide high-quality evidence.

Humoral and cell-mediated immune response to the third dose of BNT162b2 anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in patients with cancer on active treatment: Focus on wild type, Delta and Omicron strains.

e13505 Background: Although a full course of COVID-19 vaccine is effective in cancer patients, the duration of the protection and the efficacy of a booster dose against the new variants remain unknown. We prospectively evaluated the immunogenicity of the third dose of the SARS-CoV-2 BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine in cancer patients undergoing active treatment. Methods: Patients with solid cancer, vaccinated with a booster dose during active treatment, were prospectively enrolled in this study. Patients were classified in SARS-CoV-2 naïve (without previous COVID-19 infection) and SARS-CoV-2 experienced (with previous COVID-19 infection). Neutralizing antibody (NT Abs) titer and total anti-Spike IgG concentration were quantified in serum. Heparinized whole blood samples were used for SARS-CoV-2 Interferon Gamma Release Assay (IGRA). The primary endpoint was to assess the increase of IgG antibody level between baseline (T0) and 3 weeks after the booster (T1). Results: 142 consecutive patients were recruited. In SARS-CoV-2 naïve subjects, median level of IgG was 157 BAU/mL (interquartile range (IQR) 62-423) at T0 and reached median of 2080 (IQR 2080-2080) at three weeks after booster administration (T1; p < 0.0001). A median 16-fold increase of SARS-CoV-2 NT Abs titre (IQR 4-32) was observed in naïve subjects (from median 20 IQR 10-40 to median 640 IQR 160-640; p < 0.0001). Median IFN-γ level at T1 was significantly higher than that measured at T0 in SARS-CoV-2 naïve subjects (p = 0.0049) but not in SARS-CoV-2 experienced patients. No difference was observed in terms of median response between patients treated with immunotherapy and chemotherapy (p > 0.05). A stronger correlation between SARS-CoV-2 NT Abs and total IgG level was observed at T0 (r = 0.76; p < 0.0001) compared to T1 (r = 0.27, p = 0.0081). No correlation as regards the number of days was observed from the first to the third vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 NT Abs/total IgG. The median level of SARS-CoV-2 NT Abs was 32-fold lower against Omicron compared to wild type strain (p = 0.0004) and 12-fold lower compared to Delta strain (p = 0.0110). Conclusions: The third dose is able to trigger both the humoral and the cell-mediated immune response in cancer patients on active treatment. Our preliminary data about the neutralization of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine against variants of concern (VOCs) seem to confirm the vaccine lower activity.

Patients' perspectives and safety of COVID-19 vaccination among cancer patients: A prospective single-center study.

e24043 Background: Concerns about safety and treatment interference are known barriers to COVID-19 vaccination in cancer patients. Data on safety and tolerability in this population remain scarce. One of the objectives of this study is to describe COVID-19 vaccination safety in cancer patients. Methods: Patients diagnosed with a malignancy requiring systemic treatment in the last 12 months and undergoing COVID-19 vaccination were prospectively enrolled in this single-center study. Validated questionnaires to assess vaccine-related adverse events (VRAEs) were collected; chart review identified baseline characteristics and treatments received. Descriptive statistics and logistic regressions were performed. Results: 253 questionnaires were collected from 171 patients, enrolled between May and September 2021. 130 patients were survey-eligible after the 1st dose (D1) and 185 after 2nd dose (D2). 91 questionnaires were collected after D1 (Questionnaire 1: Q1) and 162 after D2 (Questionnaire 2: Q2). Surveys couldn’t be collected due to interval > 1 month between D1 / enrollment, patients’ unavailability, withdrawal of study or death. Median age was 55 (24-87) and 62.8% were female. 58.5% had solid tumors, treated with chemotherapy (49%) or checkpoint inhibitors only (9.5%); 19.4% malignancies were treated with targeted therapies and 22.1% had hematological malignancies. Most frequent solid tumors were breast (31.3%), lung (15.9%) and gastro-intestinal (GI) (14.3%). Patients received 45.6% Pfizer/BioNTech, 52.8% Moderna and 1.6% Oxford/AstraZeneca. A combination of 2 different vaccines was administered to 11.9%. Interval between D1 and D2 was ≤30 days in 53.1%, 31-90 days in 42.6%, and 91-180 days in 4.3%. Among all patients, 84.1% developed VRAEs after a median of 2 days post-vaccine for a median of 4 days. 74.5% had local symptoms (Sx) (pain, sensitivity and/or redness at injection site and/or arm) and 65.8% had systemic Sx. Most frequent systemic Sx were fatigue, chills or myalgia (39.4%), GI (6.3%) and fever (2.9%). Most patients (90.7%) described their Sx as having no / minimal impact (Gr 1), 7.8% reported seeking medical consultation (Gr 2), and 1.5% lead to hospitalization (Gr 3) (1 cardiovascular event, 1 infection; causality with concurrent systemic treatment not excluded and 1 due to malignancy). Gr 2, but not Gr 3, VRAEs were more common after D2 (11.4% vs 2.5%, p = 0.03). 41.7% considered their Sx as a new health problem. On multivariate analysis, younger age and female sex were significantly associated with the development of any Sx (OR 1.08, p = 0.01; OR 2.92, p = 0.02, respectively) and local Sx (OR 1.04, p = 0.04; OR 2.19, p = 0.04), but not systemic Sx or new health problem. Conclusions: Patients experienced mostly minor and transient symptoms post-vaccination; few perceived these as a new health problem. COVID-19 vaccination is overall safe and well-tolerated among cancer patients.

Adverse drug reactions of the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-1273 vaccine in a cohort of cancer patients of a tertiary hospital in Madrid, Spain.

e24072 Background: SARS-CoV-2 vaccines efficacy and safety have been tested in phase 3 studies which did not include cancer patients. Information is scarce regarding COVID-19 vaccines safety in this population. Methods: The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety profile of the mRNA-1273 vaccine across cancer patients and its relationship to patients’ demographics. This cross sectional study included patients 18-years or older with solid malignancies receiving active treatment in Hospital Clínico San Carlos (Madrid, Spain) who had received the three dose schedule of the mRNA9 1273 vaccine. Patient electronic medical records were reviewed retrospectively to collect data between April 19, 2021 and December 31, 2021. Patients with documented previous infection by SARS-Cov-2 were excluded. Results: 93 patients met inclusion criteria. 31 patients (33%) were male and 62 patients (66%) were female. Mean age was 61 [SD 8]. 33% of the study population had metastatic disease. The majority of patients (60%) had ECOG 0 whereas 32% and 8% of the population had ECOG 1 and 2 respectively. Most common tumors were breast (33%) and gastrointestinal (17%). Treatment modalities included chemotherapy (37%), targeted therapy (23%), immunotherapy (12%) and combined therapy (28%). Local adverse effects at the site of injection and systemic adverse reactions had different trends, local adverse reactions were reported more frequently after the first and second dose than after the third (42%, 50% and 36% respectively), while systemic adverse reactions were reported less frequently after the first and second dose than after the third (16%, 35% and 53% respectively). Most common systemic adverse effect was fever followed by malaise and myalgia. No grade 4 or 5 adverse events were reported. We found a statistically significant association between sex and systemic adverse reactions after the third dose with a moderate correlation assessed by Cramer’s V. Cochran-Armitage test showed a statistically significant linear trend, p = 0.012, with higher ECOG score associated with a lower proportion of patients suffering from systemic side effects. A logistic regression showed that females had 5.79 times higher odds to exhibit systemic adverse events after the third dose (p = 0.01) compared to males. Increasing age was associated with a decreased likelihood of exhibiting adverse events (p = 0.016). ECOG scores didn’t show a statistically significant association. Conclusions: mRNA-1273 vaccine shows a tolerable safety profile, which is similar to the non-oncologic population. The likelihood of adverse reactions appears to be associated with gender and age. Its association with ECOG scores is less evident. Further studies are needed to elucidate the safety profile of COVID-19 vaccines in cancer patients.

Combination treatment of radiofrequency ablation and peptide neoantigen vaccination: Promising modality for future cancer immunotherapy.

3151 Background: We previously reported the safety and immunogenicity of a personalized neoantigen-based peptide vaccine, iNeo-Vac-P01, in patients with a variety of cancer types. The current study investigated the synergistic effects between radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and neoantigen vaccination in cancer patients and tumor-bearing mice. Methods: 28 cancer patients were enrolled in this study, including 10 patients who had received RFA treatment within 6 months before scheduled for vaccination, and 18 patients who had not. Individualized neoantigen peptide vaccines were designed, manufactured, and delivered for all patients, followed by subcutaneous administration of GM-CSF as an adjuvant. Mouse models were used to validate the synergistic efficacy of combination treatment of RFA and neoantigen vaccination. Results: Longer median progression free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS) were observed in patients receiving RFA prior to vaccines compared to patients only receiving vaccines (4.42 and 20.18 months vs. 2.82 and 10.94 months). Ex vivo ELISpot assay showed that patients who received both had stronger IFN-γ responses against patient-specific neoantigens at baseline and post vaccination. Mice receiving RFA together with vaccine displayed higher antitumor immune responses than mice receiving single modality; addition of anti-PD-1 further enhanced the antitumor response. Conclusions: Neoantigen vaccination after RFA treatment led to an overall increase in clinical response and immune response among patients of different cancer types. Combination treatment of both modalities in mice further validated their synergistic antitumor potentials, which could be further enhanced by the addition of anti-PD-1. The mechanisms of their synergies require further investigation. Clinical trial information: NCT03662815.

Clinical impact of SARS-CoV-2 delta variant infection in tumor patients and the impact of vaccination on different cancer treatment regimens.

e18750 Background: Data on SARS-CoV-2 infections in oncological patients in the outpatient settings are scarce. Methods: During the spread of the delta variant between April 2021 and September 2021, a total of 10.677 patients were tested for SARS-CoV-2 infection by RT-qPCR in seven outpatient clinics in Bavaria, Germany. Results: Within the tested patient cohort, 4.960 patients (46.5%) suffered from a malignant disease (74% solid tumors and 26% malignant hematological diseases). This group was compared with 5.717 patients (53.5%) without a malignant disease (33.1% with other hematological diseases and 66.9% patients without a hematological or oncological disease). During the observation period, 119 (2.4%) patients with malignancies were tested positive (88 patients with solid tumors; 31 patients with malignant hematological diseases) compared to 115 positive patients (2.0%) in the control group. 32 of 119 positively tested patients (26.9%) suffering from malignant disease required hospitalization and 9/32 patients (28.1%) died during the clinical course. Conclusions: These observations are in clear contrast to data from patients we evaluated during the pre-delta variants period between 15 and 26 April 2020 in the same seven outpatient clinics. In this period, a total of 1.227 patients were tested for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-qPCR. 78/1227 patients (6.3%) were tested positive in RT-qPCR and most showed mild symptoms of infection. None of the SARS-CoV-2 infected patients died. These data were analyzed when no vaccination was available. These data were evaluated during a period where no vaccine was available. Vaccination of patients with malignancies with BiontechPfizer's mRNA vaccines was started in April 2021. The response to the vaccine was tested by an antibody assay (Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S-immunoassay, Roche) at the earliest four weeks after the second vaccination. To assess the response, we compared five patient cohorts: Patients who received (i) B cell depleting antibodies, (ii) checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), (iii) chemotherapy, or (iv) tyrosin kinase inhibitors (TKIs), and (v) healthy controls. The patients treated with ICI or TKI showed a comparable vaccination response to the healthy patients, while patients receiving Rituximab/Obinutuzumab showed no significant humoral vaccination response at all. The more severe disease course of patients infected by the SARS-CoV-2 delta variant compared to the initial waves of infections strongly underline the importance of vaccination in cancer patients.

SARS-CoV-2 infection in cancer patients on active therapy after the booster dose of mRNA vaccines

IntroductionThe protective role against SARS-CoV-2 infection by the third booster dose of mRNA vaccines in cancer patients with solid malignancies is presently unknown. We prospectively investigated the occurrence of COVID-19 in cancer patients on active therapy after the booster vaccine dose. MethodsCancer patients on treatment at the Center for Immuno-Oncology (CIO) of the University Hospital of Siena, Italy, and health care workers at CIO who had received a booster third dose of mRNA vaccine entered a systematic follow-up monitoring period to prospectively assess their potential risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Serological and microneutralization assay were utilized to assess levels of anti-spike IgG, and of neutralizing antibodies to the SARS-CoV-2 Wild Type, Delta and Omicron variants, respectively, after the booster dose and after negativization of the nasopharyngeal swab for those who had developed COVID-19. ResultsNinety cancer patients with solid tumors on active treatment (Cohort 1) and 30 health care workers (Cohort 2) underwent a booster third dose of mRNA vaccine. After the booster dose, the median value of anti-spike IgG was higher (p = 0.009) in patients than in healthy subjects. Remarkably, 11/90 (12%) patients and 11/30 (37%) healthy subjects tested positive to SARS-CoV-2 infection during the monitoring period. Similar levels of anti-spike IgG and of neutralizing antibodies against all the investigated variants, with geometric mean titers of neutralizing antibodies against the Omicron being the lowest were detected after the booster dose and after COVID-19 in both Cohorts. ConclusionsThe occurrence of SARS-CoV-2 infection we observed in a sizable proportion of booster-dosed cancer patients and in healthy subjects during the Omicron outbreak indicates that highly specific vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 variants are urgently required.

The efficacy of BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) and CoronaVac vaccines in patients with cancer.

Although vaccination is efficacious and prevents infection in the general population, there is limited data about Coronavirus disease‐19 (Covid‐19) occurrence after vaccination in cancer patients. It was aimed to evaluate the efficacy of BNT162b2 (Pfizer–BioNTech) and CoronaVac vaccines against Covid‐19 in patients with cancer. In this single‐center, retrospective, cross‐sectional, and descriptive study, the data of cancer patients referred to the medical oncology clinic of a university hospital were analyzed. The sample of the study consisted of cancer patients who had Covid‐19 or were vaccinated against Covid‐19. A total number of 2578 patients were included in the study. Of the patients, 2000 have never been infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus and 578 patients have had a positive reverse‐transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR) for Covid‐19. It was found that 2094 patients (81.2%) were fully vaccinated, and 484 patients (18.8%) did not receive full‐dose vaccination. A statistically significant difference in Covid‐19 occurrence was found between the patients who had full‐dose vaccination or not (p = 0.000). In in‐group comparisons of full‐dose vaccinated patients, while no difference was observed between two doses of BNT162b2 (Pfizer–BioNTech) and three doses of CoronaVac (p = 0.432), a statistically significant difference was observed between all other groups (p < 0.005). When the data of 578 patients who experienced Covid‐19 was analyzed, a statistically significant difference was observed between the groups who were full‐dose vaccinated and those who were not (p = 0.000). It is recommended that this vulnerable patient group should be prioritized in vaccination programs, and full‐dose vaccination (at least two doses of vaccines) should be completed as soon as possible.

Antibody Response to COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines in Oncologic and Hematologic Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy.

Background: Information on immune responses in cancer patients following mRNA COVID-19 vaccines is still insufficient, but generally, patients had impaired serological responses, especially those with hematological malignancies. We evaluated serological response to COVID-19 mRNA vaccine in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy compared with healthy controls. Methods: In total, 195 cancer patients and 400 randomly selected controls who had been administered a Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna COVID-19 vaccines in two doses were compared. The threshold of positivity was 4.33 BAU/mL. Patients were receiving anticancer treatment after the first and second dose of the vaccines. Results: a TOTAL OF 169 patients (87%) had solid tumors and 26 hemolymphopoietic diseases. Seropositivity rate was lower in patients than controls (91% vs. 96%), with an age/gender-adjusted rate ratio (RR) of 0.95 (95% CL = 0.89–1.02). Positivity was found in 97% of solid cancers and in 50% of hemolymphopoietic tumors. Both advanced and adjuvant therapy seemed to slightly reduce seropositivity rates in patients when compared to controls (RR = 0.97, 95% CL = 0.89–1.06; RR = 0.94, 95% CL = 0.87–1.01). Conclusions: the response to vaccination is similar in patients affected by solid tumors to controls. On the contrary, hemolymphopietic patients show a much lower response than controls.

COVID-19 Vaccination in Patients With Malignancy; A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety.

BackgroundData on the efficacy and safety of COVID-19 vaccines in patients with malignancy are immature. In this paper, we assessed the literature involving the use of COVID-19 vaccines in cancer patients and reported the seroconversion rates as the main outcome and severity of COVID-19 infection and side effects following COVID-19 vaccination as the secondary outcomes.MethodsA systematic review with meta-analysis was performed. Searches were conducted in electronic websites, databases, and journals, including Scopus, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science from January 01, 2019, to November 30, 2021. Studies reporting data on the safety and efficacy of COVID vaccine in cancer patients using any human samples were included. The risk of bias was assessed using the NEWCASTLE-OTTAWA scale in the included studies.ResultsA total of 724 articles were identified from databases, out of which 201 articles were duplicates and were discarded. Subsequently, 454 articles were excluded through initial screening of the titles and abstracts. Moreover, 41 studies did not report the precise seroconversion rate either based on the type of cancer or after injection of a second dose of COVID vaccine. Finally, 28 articles met all the inclusion criteria and were included in this systematic review. The overall seroconversion rates after receiving a second dose of COVID-19 vaccine, based on type of cancer were 88% (95% CI, 81%-92%) and 70% (95% CI, 60%-79%) in patients with solid tumors and hematologic malignancies, respectively.ConclusionOverall, we conclude that vaccination against COVID-19 in patients with active malignancies using activated and inactivated vaccines is a safe and tolerable procedure that is also accompanied by a high efficacy.

Immunogenicity after second and third mRNA-1273 vaccination doses in patients receiving chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or both for solid tumours.

Immunogenicity after second and third mRNA-1273 vaccination doses in patients receiving chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or both for solid tumours.

The national COVID-19 vaccination campaign targeting the extremely vulnerable: the Florence Medical Oncology Unit experience in patients with cancer

BackgroundInternational and national oncology societies had released recommendations in favor of COVID-19 vaccination in cancer patients. In the context of the national vaccination campaign targeting the so called extremely vulnerable, we aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of the mRNA vaccines in a cohort of 623 patients. MethodsBetween March 26 and April 04, 2021, the Pfizer and BioNTech BNT162b2 mRNA and the Moderna mRNA-1273 vaccines were given as a two-dose prime-boost regimen. Starting on September 25th 2021 a third dose was offered to patients in whom a suboptimal immunogenicity with COVID-19 vaccination could be expected. Safety assessments were performed by phone call 7 days after each dose. Electronic health records were accessed to review demographic information, disease history, treatment detail, and outcome events of participants patients’. FindingsNo toxicities were reported in 63.7%, 54%, and in 48.7% patients with cancer after each dose. Mild-to-moderate pain at the injection site was the most commonly adverse event. After the second dose, 46% of the 610 patients reported toxicity, with more systemic side-effects observed. Fever was reported in 45% of patients, with a temperature ≥ 38 °C in 21.4% of them. Of the 335 patients receiving a third vaccine dose, 51% reported toxicity, with 13% of patients reporting more than one effect. Logistic regression analysis reported mixed results, with limited variables or categories reporting a significant odd ratio. The type of vaccine reported a significant value at first dose (OR = 0.12; CI 0.52, 0.26; p = 0.00). Thirty-four cases of COVID-19 infection were reported with only one patient requiring a short-term hospitalization for monitoring. InterpretationThe safety profile of the mRNA vaccines does not raise any specific concerns and support prioritization of vaccination for cancer patients.

Peripheral lymphocyte subset counts predict antibody response after SARS-CoV-2 mRNA-BNT162b2 vaccine in cancer patients: Results from the Vax-On-Profile study

BackgroundThe adaptive immune response following COVID-19 vaccination is essential for humoral immunogenicity and clinical protection against symptomatic infections. We present the results of circulating lymphocyte profiling and their correlation with antibody response in cancer patients tested serologically six months after receiving a two-dose schedule of mRNA-BNT162b2 vaccine. MethodsAbsolute counts of lymphocyte subsets were determined using peripheral blood immunophenotyping. We collected samples for flow cytometry analysis alongside quantitative detection of IgG antibodies against the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein (S1). An IgG titer ≥ 50 AU/mL defined a positive seroconversion response. Results311 patients were evaluable for lymphocyte profiling and serologic testing. A preliminary multivariate analysis revealed that cytotoxic chemotherapy was the most consistent factor associated with lower counts of all lymphocyte subpopulations. T helper and B cells were found to be useful in predicting the occurrence of a positive seroconversion response using ROC curve analysis. A significant positive linear correlation was shown when anti-RBD-S1 IgG titers were compared to these lymphocyte subset counts. Univariate analysis indicated that antibody titers and seroconversion rates were significantly improved in the high-level T and B cell subgroups. Multivariate analysis confirmed these significant interactions, as well as the negative predictive value of immunosuppressive corticosteroid therapy. ConclusionsThese findings suggest that simple and widely available peripheral counts of T helper and B cells correlate with humoral response to mRNA-BNT162b2 vaccine in actively treated cancer patients. Upon validation, our results could provide additional insights into the predictive assessment of vaccination efficacy.

Acceptance, effects, and tolerability in the vaccination process against SARS-CoV-2 virus among cancer patients in Bosnia and Herzegovina: a single-center cross-sectional study

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has been the main public health issue since the end of 2019. The vaccination campaign in Bosnia and Herzegovina started in April 2021, with several vaccines available. Our study aimed to evaluate the acceptance, effects, and tolerability of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 among cancer patients. We conducted a cross-sectional, observational study between 22 October and 30 November 2021, at the Clinic of Oncology, Clinical Center University of Sarajevo. Patients were enrolled during their regular visit to the Clinic of Oncology by agreeing to complete an individual paper questionnaire. The study included 1063 patients with malignant diseases, of whom 681 (64.1%) were adequately vaccinated patients. In the study population, 76.9% of patients reported that they did not experience any side effects due to vaccination, while only 0.5% had side effects, causing a delay in their treatment. Among adequately vaccinated patients, there were 40 patients (3.8%) who were infected with SARS-CoV-2 after the second or booster dose of the vaccine. Five patients (0.5%) were hospitalized due to COVID-19 after being adequately vaccinated. The findings of our study suggest that cancer patients have a higher acceptance of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 than the general population in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Vaccination side effects are tolerable and do not cause major delays in specific cancer treatment. The protective effects of COVID-19 vaccines in the cancer patients presented in our study are comparable to available results of similar studies, which included the general population.

Evaluation of Safety and Side Effects COVID-19 Vaccine in Cancer Patients Being Treated.

According to the instructions of Iran’s National Corona Response Committee in the Iranian Ministry of Health and Medical Education, patients undergoing treatments for their cancer are prioritized in Covid-19 vaccination. The present study was therefore conducted to investigate the toxicity and acute side-effects of a Covid-19 vaccine in cancer patients presenting to Medical Oncology Clinic of Kermanshah University of Medical Science. After excluding the patients with active infection and the recently-infected ones with Covid-19, they underwent the vaccination. The patients with cell counts exceeding 3,000 received two doses of the vaccine with a 21-day interval and treatment of their underlying disease was postponed for 7 days. The side-effects were mild and tolerable and included fever (case 10), pain at the injection site (7), dizziness (7), body pain (6), abdominal pain (6), myalgia (6), headache (6), chills (3), shortness of breath (3), diarrhea (1), runny nose (1) and dryness of the throat (1). No significant toxicity was reported in the patients who were safely vaccinated under the supervision of the medical oncology clinic.

Perception and Experience of Oncologists regarding Vaccination of Cancer Patients on Active Treatment

Perception and Experience of Oncologists regarding Vaccination of Cancer Patients on Active Treatment

Immunogenicity and safety after the third dose of BNT162b2 anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in patients with solid tumors on active treatment: a prospective cohort study

BackgroundAlthough a full course of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine is effective in cancer patients, the duration of the protection and the efficacy of a booster dose against the new variants remain unknown. We prospectively evaluated the immunogenicity of the third dose of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) BNT162b2 messenger RNA vaccine in cancer patients undergoing active treatment.Patients and methodsPatients with solid cancer, vaccinated with a booster dose during active treatment, were enrolled in this study. Patients were classified into SARS-CoV-2 naïve (without previous COVID-19 infection) and SARS-CoV-2 experienced (with previous COVID-19 infection). Neutralizing antibody (NT Ab) titer and total anti-Spike immunoglobulin G (IgG) concentration were quantified in serum. Heparinized whole blood samples were used for SARS-CoV-2 Interferon Gamma Release Assay (IGRA). The primary endpoint was to assess the increase of IgG antibody level between baseline and 3 weeks after the booster.ResultsOne hundred and forty-two consecutive patients were recruited. In SARS-CoV-2-naïve subjects, the median level of IgG was 157 BAU/ml [interquartile range (IQR) 62-423 BAU/ml] at T0 and reached a median of 2080 BAU/ml (IQR 2080-2080 BAU/ml) at 3 weeks after booster administration (T1; P < 0.0001). A median 16-fold increase of SARS-CoV-2 NT Ab titer (IQR 4-32) was observed in naïve subjects (from median 20, IQR 10-40, to median 640, IQR 160-640; P < 0.0001). Median interferon-γ level at T1 was significantly higher than that measured at T0 in SARS-CoV-2-naïve subjects (P = 0.0049) but not in SARS-CoV-2-experienced patients. The median level of SARS-CoV-2 NT Abs was 32-fold lower against Omicron compared to the wild-type strain (P = 0.0004) and 12-fold lower compared to the Delta strain (P = 0.0110).ConclusionsThe third dose is able to trigger both the humoral and the cell-mediated immune response in cancer patients on active treatment. Our preliminary data about the neutralization of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine against variants of concern seem to confirm the lower vaccine activity.

COVID-19 vaccination in cancer patients: a narrative review.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has affected over 220 million individuals worldwide, and has been shown to cause increased disease severity and mortality in patients with active cancer versus healthy individuals. Vaccination is important in reducing COVID-19-associated morbidity and mortality. Thus, the aim of this article was to review the existing knowledge on effectiveness, immunogenicity and safety of COVID-19 vaccines in patients with cancer. Fifty-four articles were included following a search of PubMed and Google Scholar databases for studies published between January 2020 and September 2021 that investigated humoral and cell-mediated immune responses following COVID-19 vaccination in patients with cancer. Immunogenicity of vaccines was found to be lower in patients with cancer versus healthy individuals, and humoral immune responses were inferior in those with haematological versus solid cancers. Patient-, disease-, and treatment-related factors associated with poorer vaccine responses should be identified and corrected or mitigated when possible. Consideration should be given to offering patients with cancer second doses of COVID vaccine at shorter intervals than in healthy individuals. Patients with cancer warrant a third vaccine dose and must be prioritized in vaccination schedules. Vaccine adverse effect profiles are comparable between patients with cancer and healthy individuals.

Potential mechanisms involved on how systemic IgG antibodies specific to vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and induced by active immunotherapy decrease platelet derived free-VEGF

CIGB-247 is a vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-based active immunotherapy and it is currently under investigation for cancer treatment. This specific active immunotherapy encompasses two vaccine candidates that use a human VEGF variant molecule as antigen, in combination with two clinically tested adjuvants: VSSP or aluminum phosphate. CIGB-247 has been evaluated in patients with advanced solid tumors, recruited in two phase I clinical trials, and it has been shown to be safe and immunogenic by activating both cellular and humoral immune responses against human VEGF. The immunization induces specific IgG antibodies, and also shows as effect, the reduction of free-VEGF levels within platelets (platelet-derived free VEGF). The production of systemic IgG antibodies and the presence of VEGF in another compartment, almost exclusively within platelets, have arisen some questions about this effect detected in the vaccinated-cancer patients. Based on some relevant published works about platelet endocytosis and VEGF pharmacodynamics during bevacizumab treatment as well as the phase I clinical data of CIGB-247, this investigation aims to hypothesize and analyze the potential mechanisms involved in the reduction of platelet-derived free VEGF as a result of vaccination with CIGB-247. Abbreviations: FcγR: Fc gamma receptors; IC: immune complexes; VEGF: vascular endothelial growth factor; VEGFR1: vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1; VEGFR2: vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2.

Abstract P3-11-02: Evaluation of the effects of anticancer treatments in cancer patients undergoing SARS-COV2 vaccination (VAX-on study: Breast cancer subgroup analysis)

Abstract Background: Since the beginning of the covid19 pandemic, clinical and demographic data showed that cancer patients are at high risk of developing severe consequences of Sars-Cov2 disease. For this reason, vaccination is strongly recommended, especially for patients on active treatment. Nevertheless, the efficacy of the Sars-Cov2 vaccine in cancer patients is not fully investigated. Our trial aim to explore the seroconversion in a large series of vaccinated cancer patients undergoing active treatment. Here we present a subgroup analysis concerning patients affected by breast cancer. Methods: The “VAX-on” is a single-center study that enrolled 366 cancer patients who underwent oncological treatment within the last six months. The study was approved by the ethics committee and all patients had to sign specific informed consent to be enrolled. Subjects were vaccinated against Sars-Cov2 with mRNA vaccine BNT162b2 (Comirnaty) - Pfizer BioNTech. Blood samples were obtained to quantify the production of specific anti-Spike IgG antibodies at day 21 from the first dose and at 6-8 weeks after the second dose. The antibody laboratory title cut-off of 50 U.A./mL defined the seroconversion. Results are shown as Mean and Standard Deviation for continuous variable, percentage (%) for categorical ones. The Mann-Whitney test or Chi-Square test were used to compare continuous or categorical groups, respectively. Results: A total of 100 patients with breast cancer were enrolled. Clinical and demographic data are summarized in Table 1. The median age was 60.5 years and the majority had an ECOG PS of 0 (75%). Almost all were women (97%), with advanced cancer in 60% of cases. In early or advanced setting 46% patients were treated with chemotherapy while 54% were on target therapy (also including monoclonal antibody and CDK4/6 inhibitors). The mean antibody title after the first dose of mRNA Comirnaty vaccine was 2185.03±9303.26 U.A./mL (M±SD), while after the second dose the mean antibody title rise to 6492.10±10425.95 (M±SD). After the first dose 61% of patients were considered as immunized, meanwhile after the second dose 86% of patients resulted immunized (defined as an antibody title &amp;gt;50 U.A./mL). In the 9 patients in treatment with steroids (prednisone &amp;gt; 10mg/die or equivalent), there was a trend to a decreased antibody development compared to patients without chronic use of steroids (p 0.06 and 0.05 after the first and second dose, respectively). Of interest, patients using G-CSF (12%) had a significant reduction in the production of Sars-Cov2 antibody after vaccination compared to patients who did not use them (p 0.02 and &amp;lt;0.001 after the first and second dose, respectively), with only 75% resulted positively immunized after the second dose (p=0.04). No differences were seen when comparing patients in advanced with non-advanced stage. Conclusions: Our study demonstrated 86% seroconversion in cancer patients after the second dose of mRNA vaccine regardless of disease stage or type of cancer treatment received. Further evaluations are needed to define whether the use of corticosteroids and G-CSF have an impact on seroconversion. Table 1.Parameters *Gender (F) (%)97 (97.00)Age (yrs)60.55±11.94Advanced Stage (Yes) (%)60 (60.00)ECOGPS (%)075 (75.00)121 (21.00)24 (4.00)Setting (%)Other Therapy60 (60.00)Adjuvant &amp; Neoadjuvant40 (40.00)Therapy (%)Other46 (46.00)Target54 (54.00)Last cycle &amp;lt;28 days (Yes) (%)81 (81.00)Timing CHT 1st Dose17.75±28.66Timing CHT 2nd Dose15.80±28.44Steroids (&amp;gt;10 mg)/&amp;gt; 7 days9 (9.00)FANS last 7 days (Yes) (%)15 (15.00)G-CSF last 21 days (Yes) (%)12 (12.00)Previous Allergies (Yes) (%)19 (19.00)Antibody Title 1st Dose2185.03±9303.26Antibody Level 1st Dose (&amp;gt;50) (%)61 (62.89)Antibody Title 2nd Dose6492.10±10425.95Antibody Level 2nd Dose (&amp;gt;50) (%)86 (92.47) Citation Format: Agnese Fabbri, Eleonora Marrucci, Fabrizio Nelli, Marco Mazzotta, Angelo Onorato, Primi Francesca, Mario Giovanni Chilelli, Antonella Virtuoso, Carlo Signorelli, Julio R Giron Berrios, Marta Schirripa, Rossella Donghia, Enzo Maria Ruggeri. Evaluation of the effects of anticancer treatments in cancer patients undergoing SARS-COV2 vaccination (VAX-on study: Breast cancer subgroup analysis) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-11-02.