V20 Gy Research Articles

RADT-05. VASCULAR OVERLAP PROVIDES PROTECTION FROM GAMMA-KNIFE-INDUCED RADIATION NECROSIS IN A METASTATIC BRAIN TUMOR COHORT

Abstract INTRODUCTION Radiation necrosis (RN) is a long-term complication of Gamma-Knife (GK) Radiosurgery, an established treatment for metastatic brain tumors. Few dosimetric parameters have shown to predict RN, including tumor target volume, treatment dose, and V12 Gy (volume of normal brain receiving 12 Gy). Vascularity has yet to be explored as an independent predictor of RN. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the role of vascular overlap in GK-induced RN. METHODS All metastatic brain tumor patients treated with GK between 2014-2019 were retrospectively screened for post-treatment radiographic RN. Vascular overlap, defined by the MCA-ACA and MCA-PCA border regions, was determined by two blinded neurosurgeons and one radiation oncologist. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine factors predictive of RN using variables determined significant by univariate analysis and clinical relevance. Covariates included V12 as a binary variable (≥8 vs. <8 cm3), vascular overlap, supratentorial location, and eloquent location. RESULTS 6% (20/321) of all metastatic brain tumor patients developed RN and were included for analysis, with the final cohort being 60% (12/20) female with a mean age of 59 years, comprising 77 lesions. V12 (≥8 cm3) showed a significant increase in risk of developing RN [OR = 8.18; (coef, 95% CI: 2.10 (0.49, 3.72), p=0.011)]. Conversely, vascular overlap showed a protective effect against RN [OR = 0.23 (-1.49 (-2.79, -0.19), p=0.024)], with a lower rate of RN in areas of vascular overlap (10%) than non-vascular overlap (26%). Neither supratentorial location [OR = 3.31 (1.20 (-0.76, 3.16), p=0.231)] nor location within eloquent brain [OR = 0.96 (-0.04 (-1.48, 1.39), p=0.95)] showed significance. CONCLUSION For the first time, we show that patients with metastatic brain lesions in anatomical regions of vascular overlap treated with GK are less likely to develop RN. Future work should validate these findings with the goal of optimizing radiation dosing to mitigate RN incidence and recurrence rates.

Clinical Outcomes and Relevance of Composite V12 Gy in Patients With Four or More Brain Metastases Treated With Single Fraction Stereotactic Radiosurgery

AimsTissue V12Gy (total brain volume receiving 12Gy including target) can predict for late toxicity in single target benign disease treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). The value of this metric remains uncertain for multiple brain metastases. This retrospective cohort study reports the outcomes and evaluates the predictors of toxicity in patients with four or more brain metastases treated with single-fraction SRS. Materials and methodsTwo hundred twenty-six patients with 2160 metastases treated from 2014-21 were retrospectively studied. Symptomatic late toxicity (new/progressive neurological symptoms ≥3 months post SRS) with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) changes suggestive of treatment effect were analysed. Kaplan–Meier and competing risk analysis was used to assess survival and toxicity respectively. Resultsmedian number of metastases/patient was 6 (range: 4-41) and median composite tissue V12Gy (inclusive of planning target volume (PTV)) was 11.3 cc (IQR: 6.1 cc–17.1 cc). Sixteen out of the 226 patients developed symptomatic late radiation adverse event (R-AE), and the cumulative incidence was 4.9% at 1 year and 6.9% at 2 years. The total target volume was significantly predictive of the risk of late R-AE. Volume of the largest lesion, V12Gy and V15Gy did not predict for late R-AE, but plotted graphs showed suggestions of linear relationships between dosimetric parameters and late R-AE. ConclusionWithin the limitations of this study, the cumulative incidence of symptomatic toxicity remains acceptable despite routinely accepting a composite tissue V12Gy in excess of 10 cc to treat multiple brain metastases. Advances in knowledgeV12Gy has limitations as a plan quality metric in multiple brain metastases treated with SRS. There is insufficient evidence to have a defined target limit as <10 cc.

Moving beyond mean heart dose: The importance of cardiac substructures in radiation therapy toxicity.

Normal tissue tolerance dose limits to the heart have been established to reduce the risk of radiation-induced cardiac disease (RICD). Dose constraints have been developed based on either the mean dose delivered to the whole heart (MHD) or the dose delivered to a specific volume, for example, volume of heart receiving equal to or greater than 30 Gy (V30). There is increasing evidence that the impact of thoracic radiation on cardiac morbidity and mortality has been underestimated. Consequently, there is a need to reduce the dose delivered to the heart in radical radiotherapy treatment planning. The pathophysiology of RICD may relate to dose to specific cardiac substructures (CS) rather than the traditionally observed MHD for common toxicities. The MHD or V30 Gy threshold dose rarely represents the true dose delivered to individual CS. Studies have shown the dose to specific areas may be more strongly correlated with overall survival (OS). With advances in modern radiotherapy techniques, it is vital that we develop robust, evidence-based dose limits for CS, to fully understand and reduce the risk of RICD, particularly in high-risk populations with cardiac risk factors. The following review will summarise the existing evidence of dose limits to CS, explain how dose limits may vary according to different disease sites or radiation techniques and propose how radiotherapy plans can be optimised to reduce the dose to these CS in clinical practice.

COMPARATIVE RADIATION DOSIMETRY OF WHOLE BREAST RADIOTHERAPY USING IMRT AND VMAT TECHNIQUES IN LEFT SIDED BREAST CANCER PATIENTS AFTER BREAST CONSERVING SURGERY

Background:The radiotherapy of left sided breast cancers is mandatory and integral part of treatment and challenging because of surrounding critical structures posing increased risk of complications. The main objective of this study was to quantify doses toorgan at risk(OARs) including left lung, heart, contralateral breast, spinal cord, and planning target volume (PTV) using different radiation techniques like Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)&amp;volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and comparison of radiation dosimetry. Methods: A prospective study of 30 patients of left sided breast cancer who had undergone Breast Conservative Surgery (BCS) and chemotherapy was done for adjuvant radiation. For every patient radiation planning was done by two different techniques IMRT and VMAT. Then the comparison of radiation dosimetry parameters was done for all the techniques including the parameters like PTV coverage, doses to OAR like heart, left lung, contralateral breast and spinal cord and head of humerus. The Homogenity Index (HI) were calculated. Result: The Mean age of the patient was 46.7 years. When comparing the doses delivered in IMRT and VMAT Technique for left sided breast cancer post breast conservation surgery there was significant difference in PTV Breast and axilla V95 Gy. It was 96.2±1.9% (IMRT) vs 94.8±1.71% (VMAT), (p=0.004). However significant sparing of Organs at Risk was seen. With ipsilateral lung dose mean V5 Gy was 77.86± 9.68% (IMRT) v/s 83.04± 9.86 % (VMAT), (p=0.0446). Also mean V30 Gy was 14.6±4.82% with IMRT vs 16.54±5.86% with VMAT, (p=0.0169). Heart mean dose was 8.8±1.49 Gy with IMRT and 10.98±3.7 Gy with VMAT, (p=0.0227). Further V30 Gy for Heart was 4.61±3.8% with IMRT and 6.72±4.0% with VMAT, (p=0.0132).No significant difference was seen with IMRT and VMAT technique for contralateral lung, contralateral breast and spinal cord. Conclusion: In treatment of patients with radiation with left breast cancer patients post BCS using IMRT and VMAT technique it is seen significant dose reduction with IMRT Technique for ipsilateral lung and Heart as compared to VMAT technique. Significant V95 coverage for PTV Breast and axilla with IMRT as compared to VMAT. Hence in our Study IMRT technique was found to be superior for better sparing of Organ at risk and better PTV coverage.

Correlation between dose-volume parameters and rectal bleeding after 12 fractions of carbon ion radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

Carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) is currently used to treat prostate cancer. Rectal bleeding is a major cause of toxicity even with CIRT. However, to date, a correlation between the dose and volume parameters of the 12 fractions of CIRT for prostate cancer and rectal bleeding has not been shown. Similarly, the clinical risk factors for rectal bleeding were absent after 12 fractions of CIRT. To identify the risk factors for rectal bleeding in 12 fractions of CIRT for prostate cancer. Among 259 patients who received 51.6 Gy [relative biological effectiveness (RBE)], in 12 fractions of CIRT, 15 had grade 1 (5.8%) and nine had grade 2 rectal bleeding (3.5%). The dose-volume parameters included the volume (cc) of the rectum irradiated with at least x Gy (RBE) (Vx) and the minimum dose in the most irradiated x cc normal rectal volume (Dx). The mean values of D6cc, D2cc, V10 Gy (RBE), V20 Gy (RBE), V30 Gy (RBE), and V40 Gy (RBE) were significantly higher in the patients with rectal bleeding than in those without. The cutoff values were D6cc = 34.34 Gy (RBE), D2cc = 46.46 Gy (RBE), V10 Gy (RBE) = 9.85 cc, V20 Gy (RBE) = 7.00 cc, V30 Gy (RBE) = 6.91 cc, and V40 Gy (RBE) = 4.26 cc. The D2cc, V10 Gy (RBE), and V20 Gy (RBE) cutoff values were significant predictors of grade 2 rectal bleeding. The above dose-volume parameters may serve as guidelines for preventing rectal bleeding after 12 fractions of CIRT for prostate cancer.

Reirradiation of metastases of the central nervous system: part 1-brain metastasis.

Because of improved survival of cancer patients, more patients irradiated for brain metastases develop intracerebral recurrences requiring subsequent courses of radiotherapy. Five studies focused on reirradiation with whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) after initial WBRT for brain metastases. Following the second WBRT course, improvement of clinical symptoms was found in 31-68% of patients. Rates of neurotoxicity, such as encephalopathy or cognitive decline, were reported in two studies (1.4% and 32%). In another study, severe or unexpected adverse events were not observed. Survival following the second WBRT course was generally poor, with median survival times of 2.9-4.1 months. The survival prognosis of patients receiving two courses of WBRT can be estimated by a scoring tool considering five prognostic factors. Three studies investigated reirradiation with single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SF-SRS) following primary WBRT. One-year local control rates were 74-91%, and median survival times ranged between 7.8 and 14 months. Rates of radiation necrosis (RN) after reirradiation were 0-6%. Seven studies were considered that investigated re-treatment with SF-SRS or fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy (FSRT) following initial SF-SRS or FSRT. One-year local control rates were 60-88%, and the median survival times ranged between 8.3 and 25 months. During follow-up after reirradiation, rates of overall (asymptomatic or symptomatic) RN ranged between 12.5% and 30.4%. Symptomatic RN occurred in 4.3% to 23.9% of cases (patients or lesions). The risk of RN associated with symptoms and/or requiring surgery or corticosteroids appears lower after reirradiation with FSRT when compared to SF-SRS. Other potential risk factors of RN include the volume of overlap of normal tissue receiving 12 Gy at the first course and 18 Gy at the second course of SF-SRS, maximum doses ≥40 Gy of the first or the second SF-SRS courses, V12 Gy >9 cm3 of the second course, initial treatment with SF-SRS, volume of normal brain receiving 5 Gy during reirradiation with FSRT, and systemic treatment. Cumulative EQD2 ≤100-120 Gy2 to brain, <100 Gy2 to brainstem, and <75 Gy2 to chiasm and optic nerves may be considered safe. Since most studies were retrospective in nature, prospective trials are required to better define safety and efficacy of reirradiation for recurrent or progressive brain metastases.

Feasibility of Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery Sparing Radiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Lung Cancer

Efforts to mitigate radiotherapy (RT) associated cardiotoxicity have focused on constraining mean heart dose (MHD). However, recent studies have shown greater predictive power with cardiac substructure dose metrics such as the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery volume (V) receiving 15Gy (V15Gy) ≥10%. Herein, we investigated the feasibility of LAD radiation sparing in contemporary IMRT/VMAT lung cancer plans. Single institution retrospective analysis of 54 locally advanced lung cancer patients treated with thoracic RT between February 2018-August 2021. After excluding 33 (5=non-IMRT/VMAT or intentionally LAD-optimized; 28=LAD V15Gy<10%), 21 plans with LAD V15Gy ≥10% were identified for LAD re-optimization with intent to meet LAD V15Gy <10% while maintaining meeting organ-at-risk (OAR) metrics and target coverage with original plan parameters. Dosimetric variables were compared using paired t tests. Most (57.1%, 12/21) were treated with definitive RT, 8/21 (38.1%) with post-operative RT, and one with neoadjuvant RT. The median prescribed RT dose was 60Gy (range 50.4-66Gy) in 30 fractions (range 28-33). LAD re-optimized plans (vs original) led to significant reductions in mean LAD V15Gy (39.4% ±13.9% vs 9.4% ±13.0%; p<0.001) and mean LAD dose (12.9Gy ± 4.6Gy vs 7.6Gy ±2.8Gy; p<0.001). Most (85.7%; 18/21) LAD re-optimized plans achieved LAD V15Gy <10%. There were no statistically significant differences in overall lung, esophageal, or spinal cord dose metrics. Only one re-optimization (1/21) exceeded an OAR constraint that was initially met in the original plan. To our knowledge, this is the first report describing the feasibility of LAD-optimized lung cancer RT planning using the newly identified LAD V15 Gy constraint. We observed that LAD V15Gy <10% is achievable in more than 85% of plans initially exceeding this constraint, with minimal dosimetric tradeoffs. Our results support the feasibility of routine incorporation of the LAD as an OAR in modern thoracic IMRT/VMAT planning.

Dose conformity and falloff in single-lesion intracranial SRS with DCA and VMAT methods.

Intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) aims at achieving highly conformal dose distribution and, at the same time, attaining rapid dose falloff outside the treatment target. SRS is performed using different techniques including dynamic conformal arcs (DCA) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). In this study, we compare dose conformity and falloff in DCA and VMAT plans for SRS with a single target. To compare dose conformity in SRS plans, we employ a novel conformity index , RTOG conformity index ( ), and Riet-Paddick conformity index ( ). In addition, we use indices , , and to evaluate dose falloff. For each of the considered 118 cases of SRS, two plans were created using DCA and VMAT. A two-tailed Student's t-test was used to evaluate the difference between the employed indices for the DCA and VMAT plans. The studied VMAT plans were characterized by higher dose conformity than the DCA plans. The differences between the conformity indices for the DCA plans and VMAT plans were statistically significant. The DCA plans had a smaller number of monitor units (MUs) and smaller indices R50%, V10 Gy, and V12 Gy than the VMAT plans. However, the differences between R50%, V10 Gy, and V12 Gy for the DCA and VMAT plans were not statistically significant. Although the studied VMAT plans had higher dose conformity, they also had larger MUs than the DCA plans. In terms of dose falloff characterized by parameters R50%, V10 Gy, and V12 Gy, DCA serves as a reasonable alternative to VMAT in the case of a single brain metastasis.

A Prospective Study on the Use of Deep Inspiration Breath-Hold Technique in External Beam Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer

Background Breast cancer is the most common cancer and the leading cause of death in women. The deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) technique helps reduce the dose received by the heart and lungs in breast cancers during adjuvant radiotherapy (RT). We present the dosimetry of heart and lungs with DIBH technique, reproducibility, and ease of execution. Materials and Methods This is a prospective study among breast cancer patients planned for adjuvant RT following either breast conservation or mastectomy. Patients received adjuvant RT to a dose of 42.5 Gy/16 Fr to the chest wall/whole breast followed by a boost of 10 Gy/5 Fr for breast conservation surgery patients with either three-dimensional conformal RT or volumetric modulated arc therapy technique. The dosimetric parameters such as lung mean dose, heart mean dose, and V25 Gy were compared between DIBH and free-breathing (FB) scans. Data were analyzed using SPSS software, and p-value &lt;0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results The study was conducted from September 2018 to August 2020, and 32 patients were included. The compliance to the DIBH technique was good. The dose received by ipsilateral lung V20 (17 vs. 25%) and mean dose (9 vs. 12 Gy) were significantly lower in DIBH compared with FB (p &lt; 0.001). The V5 (31 vs. 15%), V25 (9 vs. 2%), and mean dose (7 vs. 3.3 Gy) to the heart were much higher in FB compared with DIBH (p &lt; 0.001). Conclusion DIBH-based RT treatment delivery for breast cancer patients requiring adjuvant RT showed good compliance and offers a significant reduction in radiation dose to the heart and lung.

Improving the Efficiency of Single-Isocenter Multiple Metastases Stereotactic Radiosurgery Treatment

PurposeMultiple brain metastases can be treated efficiently with Stereotactic Radio Surgery (SRS) using a Single Isocenter Dynamic Conformal Arc (SIDCA) technique. Currently plans are manually optimized, which may lead to unnecessary table angles and arcs being used. This study aimed to evaluate an automatic 4π-optimization SIDCA algorithm for treatment efficiency and plan quality.Methods and MaterialsAutomatic 4π-optimized SIDCA plans were created and compared to the manually optimized clinical plans for 54 patients who received single-fraction SRS to 2-10 metastases. The number of table angles and arcs were compared with a paired t-test using a Bonferroni-corrected significance level of p<0.05/4=0.0125. The reduction in treatment time was estimated from the difference in the number of table angles and arcs. Plan quality was assessed through the volume-averaged inverse Paddick Conformity Index (CI) and Gradient Index (GI), and the volume of normal brain surrounding each metastasis receiving 12 Gy (local V12 Gy). For a five-patient subset the automatic plans were manually adjusted further. CI and GI were assessed for non-inferiority using a one-sided t-test with the non-inferiority limit equal to the 95% inter-observer reproducibility limit from a separate planning study (corrected significance level p<0.05/(4−1)=0.017).ResultsThe automatic plans significantly improved treatment efficiency with a mean reduction in the number of table angles and arcs of −0.5±0.1 and −1.3±0.2 respectively (± standard error, both p<0.001). Estimated treatment time saving was −2.7±0.5minutes, 14% of the total. The volume-averaged CI and GI were non-inferior to the clinical plans (both p<0.001), although there was a small systematic shift in CI of 0.07±0.01. The resulting difference in local V12 Gy, 0.25±0.04cm3, was not clinically significant. Minor manual adjustment of the automatic plans removed these slight differences whilst preserving the improved treatment efficiency.ConclusionsAutomatic 4π-optimization can generate SIDCA SRS plans with improved treatment efficiency and non-inferior plan quality.

Dosimetry and treatment efficiency of SBRT using TaiChiB radiotherapy system for two-lung lesions with one overlapping organs at risk.

This study aims to assess the dosimetry and treatment efficiency of TaiChiB-based Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) plans applying to treat two-lung lesions with one overlapping organs at risk. For four retrospective patients diagnosed with two-lung lesions each patient, four treatment plans were designed including Plan Edge, TaiChiB linac-based, RGS-based, and a linac-RGS hybrid (Plan TCLinac, Plan TCRGS, and Plan TCHybrid). Dosimetric metrics and beam-on time were employed to evaluate and compare the TaiChiB-based plans against Plan Edge. For Conformity Index (CI), Plan TCRGS outperformed all other plans with an average CI of 1.06, as opposed to Plan Edge's 1.33. Similarly, for R50%, Plan TCRGS was superior with an average R50% of 3.79, better than Plan Edge's 4.28. In terms of D2 cm, Plan TCRGS also led with an average of 48.48%, compared to Plan Edge's 56.25%. For organ at risk (OAR) sparing, Plan TCRGS often displayed the lowest dosimetric values, notably for the spinal cord (Dmax 5.92 Gy) and lungs (D1500cc 1.00 Gy, D1000cc 2.61 Gy, V10 Gy 15.14%). However, its high Dmax values for the heart and great vessels sometimes exceeded safety thresholds. Plan TCHybrid presented a balanced approach, showing doses comparable to or better than Plan Edge without crossing safety limits. In terms of beam-on time, Plan TCLinac emerged as the most efficient treatment option in three out of four cases, followed closely by Plan Edge in one case. Plan TCRGS, despite its dosimetric advantages, was the least efficient, recording notably longer beam-on times, with a peak at 33.28 minutes in Case 2. For patients with two-lung lesions treated by SBRT whose one lesion overlaps with OARs, the Plan TCHybrid delivered by TaiChiB digital radiotherapy system can be recommended as a clinical option.

Dose Evaluation in 2-Phase Method for Advanced Esophageal Cancer by Hybrid Irradiation Techniques

PurposeIn concurrent chemoradiotherapy for advanced esophageal cancer, a 2-phase method consisting of initial irradiation of a wide elective nodal region and boost irradiation of the primary lesion is commonly employed. Although dose escalation to the primary lesion may be required to achieve higher local control rates, the radiation dose to critical organs must not exceed dose constraints. To achieve an optimum balance of dose prescription and dose reduction to surrounding organs, such as the lungs and heart, we compared hybrid dose distributions and investigated the best combination of the following recent irradiation techniques: volumetric modulation arc therapy (VMAT), proton broad-beam irradiation, and intensity-modulated proton beam therapy (IMPT). Materials and MethodsForty-five patients with advanced esophageal cancer whose primary lesions were located in the middle- or lower-thoracic region were studied. Radiotherapy plans for the initial and boost irradiation in the 2-phase method were calculated using VMAT, proton broad-beam irradiation, and IMPT calculation codes, and the dose-volume histogram indices of the lungs and heart for the accumulated plans were compared. ResultsIn plans using boost proton irradiation with a prescribed dose of 60 Gy(RBE), all dose-volume histogram indices were significantly below the tolerance limits. Initial and boost irradiation with VMAT resulted in the median dose of V30 Gy(RBE)(heart) of 27.4% and an achievement rate below the tolerance limit of 57.8% (26 cases). In simulations of dose escalation up to 70 Gy(RBE), initial and boost IMPT resulted in the highest achievement rate, satisfying all dose constraints in 95.6% (43 cases). ConclusionApplying VMAT to both initial and boost irradiation is not recommended because of the increased risk of the cardiac dose exceeding the tolerance limit. IMPT may allow dose escalation of up to 70 Gy(RBE) without radiation risks to the lungs and heart in the treatment of advanced esophageal cancer.

Skin dose-volume predictors of moderate-severe late side effects after whole breast radiotherapy

BackgroundToxicity after whole breast Radiotherapy is a relevant issue, impacting the quality-of-life of a not negligible number of patients. We aimed to develop a Normal Tissue Complication Probability (NTCP) model predicting late toxicities by combining dosimetric parameters of the breast dermis and clinical factors. MethodsThe skin structure was defined as the outer CT body contour's 5 mm inner isotropic expansion. It was retrospectively segmented on a large mono-institutional cohort of early-stage breast cancer patients enrolled between 2009 and 2017 (n = 1066). Patients were treated with tangential-field RT, delivering 40 Gy in 15 fractions to the whole breast. Toxicity was reported during Follow-Up (FU) using SOMA/LENT scoring. The study endpoint was moderate-severe late side effects consisting of Fibrosis-Atrophy-Telangiectasia-Pain (FATP G ≥ 2) developed within 42 months after RT completion. A machine learning pipeline was designed with a logistic model combining clinical factors and absolute skin DVH (cc) parameters as output. ResultsThe FATP G2 + rate was 3.8 %, with 40/1066 patients experiencing side effects. After the preprocessing of variables, a cross-validation was applied to define the best-performing model. We selected a 4-variable model with Post-Surgery Cosmetic alterations (Odds Ratio, OR = 7.3), Aromatase Inhibitors (as a protective factor with OR = 0.45), V20 Gy (50 % of the prescribed dose, OR = 1.02), and V42 Gy (105 %, OR = 1.09). Factors were also converted into an adjusted V20Gy. ConclusionsThe association between late reactions and skin DVH when delivering 40 Gy/15 fr was quantified, suggesting an independent role of V20 and V42. Few clinical factors heavily modulate the risk.

Incidence of acute and delayed rectal toxicities following hydrogel spacer insertion in men receiving dose-escalated radiotherapy for prostate cancer

Objectives: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a hydrogel spacer in reducing acute and delayed rectal toxicities. Materials and Methods: Patients undergoing definitive radiotherapy between January 2015 and March 2018 were retrospectively identified from our institutional cancer registry. Planning data were collected on dose-volume histograms (DVH) for V65, V70 and V75 Gy. All patients underwent definitive volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) of 78 Gy over 39 fractions in a single centre. Toxicity reporting and definitions were in accordance with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) guidelines. Results: A total of 162 patients received radiotherapy during the study period (spacer n = 80; no spacer n = 82). Baseline characteristics between groups were comparable. Acute rectal toxicity was documented in 19 men (24%) with spacer versus 36 men (44%) without spacer devices ( p = 0.007). Over a median post-treatment follow-up period of 17 months (range = 3–38 months), there was a significant reduction in delayed toxicity in men with spacers compared to men without (17 men 21% vs. 31 men 39%, p = 0.021). Conclusion: Hydrogel spacer devices reduce rectal radiation exposure in prostate cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy. This translates into a clinical benefit in terms of acute and delayed rectal toxicities. Level of evidence: cohort study

Proton PBS Planning Techniques, Robustness Evaluation, and OAR Sparing for the Whole-Brain Part of Craniospinal Axis Irradiation.

Proton therapy is a promising modality for craniospinal irradiation (CSI), offering dosimetric advantages over conventional treatments. While significant attention has been paid to spine fields, for the brain fields, only dose reduction to the lens of the eye has been reported. Hence, the objective of this study is to assess the potential gains and feasibility of adopting different treatment planning techniques for the entire brain within the CSI target. To this end, eight previously treated CSI patients underwent retrospective replanning using various techniques: (1) intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) optimization, (2) the modification/addition of field directions, and (3) the pre-optimization removal of superficially placed spots. The target coverage robustness was evaluated and dose comparisons for lenses, cochleae, and scalp were conducted, considering potential biological dose increases. The target coverage robustness was maintained across all plans, with minor reductions when superficial spot removal was utilized. Single- and multifield optimization showed comparable target coverage robustness and organ-at-risk sparing. A significant scalp sparing was achieved in adults but only limited in pediatric cases. Superficial spot removal contributed to scalp V30 Gy reduction at the expense of lower coverage robustness in specific cases. Lens sparing benefits from multiple field directions, while cochlear sparing remains impractical. Based on the results, all investigated plan types are deemed clinically adoptable.

Radiotherapy Planning in Synchronous Bilateral Breast Cancer Irradiation: A Dosimetric Study

Background: The large radiation field and surrounding normal structures make treatment planning and dose delivery of synchronous bilateral breast cancer (SBBC) much more difficult than it is for unilateral breast cancer. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) can produce acceptable normal tissue sparing while improving target dose coverage compared to 3D-CRT. With this context in mind, we carried out a study to examine the dosimetric variations of IMRT and VMAT techniques using a single isocenter for planning cases of SBBC. Patients and methods: Five patients were considered for this study. All the patients had undergone bilateral mastectomy. Dose prescribed was 50 Gy in 25 fractions. VMAT and IMRT plans were created for each patient. All the plans made were mono-isocentric. Dosimetric data of the target and organs at risk (OAR) were compared. Results: There is a trend towards better PTV coverage using VMAT compared to IMRT (V95 IMRT=94.8720, V95 VMAT=95.8740; P=0.316). VMAT plans significantly improved the dose homogeneity as V105% decreased from 2.886% to 0.312% using VMAT plans (P=0.001). IMRT plans showed trend towards higher lung Dmean and V20Gy than VMAT plans. The irradiation dose to the heart was significantly higher in the IMRT plan than VMAT plan, resulting in Dmean of 15.836 Gy vs 13.580 Gy (P=0.026), V25Gy of 16.498% vs 13.832% (P=0.046) and V30 Gy of 9.774% vs 7.022% (P= 0.043). Conclusion: The single isocentric VMAT technique can be performed conveniently in SBBC. It improves target volume coverage with optimal normal tissue sparing. It is a feasible approach while planning synchronous bilateral breast irradiation.&#x0D;

An IMRT planning technique for treating whole breast or chest wall with regional lymph nodes on Halcyon and Ethos.

Field size limitations on Halcyon and Ethos treatment machines largely preclude use of the conventional monoisocentric three-field technique for breast/chest wall and regional lymph nodes. We present an alternative, IMRT-based planning approach that facilitates treatment on Halcyon and Ethos while preserving plan quality. Eight breast and regional node cases (four left-sided, four right-sided) were planned for an Ethos machine using a 15-17 field IMRT technique. Institutional plan quality metrics for CTV and PTV coverage and OAR sparing were assessed. Five plans (four right-sided, one left-sided) were also planned using a hybrid 3D multisocenter technique. CTV coverage and OAR sparing were compared to the IMRT plans. Eclipse scripting tools were developed to aid in beam placement and plan evaluation through a set of dosimetric scorecards, and both are shared publicly. On average, the IMRT plans achieved breast CTV and PTV coverage at 50Gy of 97.9% and 95.7%, respectively. Supraclavicular CTV and PTV coverages at 45Gy were 100% and 95.5%. Axillary lymph node CTV and PTV coverages at 45Gy were 100% and 97.1%, and IMN CTV coverage at 45Gy was 99.2%. Mean ipsilateral lung V20 Gy was 19.3%, and average mean heart dose was 1.6Gy for right-sided cases and 3.0Gy for left-sided. In comparison to the hybrid 3D plans, IMRT plans achieved higher breast and supraclavicular CTV coverage (99.9%vs. 98.6% and 99.9%vs. 93.4%), higher IMN coverage (99.6%vs. 78.2%), and lower ipsilateral lung V20 Gy (19.6%vs. 28.2%). Institutional plan quality benchmarks were achieved for all eight cases using the IMRT-based planning approach. The IMRT-based planning approach offered superior conformity and OAR sparing than a competing hybrid 3D approach.

Simulating an intra-fraction adaptive workflow to enable PTV margin reduction in MRIgART volumetric modulated arc therapy for prostate SBRT.

This study simulates a novel prostate SBRT intra-fraction re-optimization workflow in MRIgART to account for prostate intra-fraction motion and evaluates the dosimetric benefit of reducing PTV margins. VMAT prostate SBRT treatment plans were created for 10 patients using two different PTV margins, one with a 5 mm margin except 3 mm posteriorly (standard) and another using uniform 2 mm margins (reduced). All plans were prescribed to 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions and adapted onto each daily MRI dataset. An intra-fraction adaptive workflow was simulated for the reduced margin group by synchronizing the radiation delivery with target position from cine MRI imaging. Intra-fraction delivered dose was reconstructed and prostate DVH metrics were evaluated under three conditions for the reduced margin plans: Without motion compensation (no-adapt), with a single adapt prior to treatment (ATP), and lastly for intra-fraction re-optimization during delivery (intra). Bladder and rectum DVH metrics were compared between the standard and reduced margin plans. As expected, rectum V18 Gy was reduced by 4.4 ± 3.9%, D1cc was reduced by 12.2 ± 6.8% (3.4 ± 2.3 Gy), while bladder reductions were 7.8 ± 5.6% for V18 Gy, and 9.6 ± 7.3% (3.4 ± 2.5 Gy) for D1cc for the reduced margin reference plans compared to the standard PTV margin. For the intrafraction replanning approach, average intra-fraction optimization times were 40.0 ± 2.9 seconds, less than the time to deliver one of the four VMAT arcs (104.4 ± 9.3 seconds) used for treatment delivery. When accounting for intra-fraction motion, prostate V36.25 Gy was on average 96.5 ± 4.0%, 99.1 ± 1.3%, and 99.6 ± 0.4 for the non-adapt, ATP, and intra-adapt groups, respectively. The minimum dose received by the prostate was less than 95% of the prescription dose in 84%, 36%, and 10% of fractions, for the non-adapt, ATP, and intra-adapt groups, respectively. Intra-fraction re-optimization improves prostate coverage, specifically the minimum dose to the prostate, and enables PTV margin reduction and subsequent OAR sparing. Fast re-optimizations enable uninterrupted treatment delivery.

Dynamics and predictors of hematologic toxicity during cranio-spinal irradiation.

Craniospinal irradiation (CSI) is a complex radiotherapy (RT) technique required for treating specific brain tumors and some hematologic malignancies. With large volumes of hematogenous bone marrow (BM) being irradiated, CSI could cause acute hematologic toxicity, leading to treatment interruptions or severe complications. We report on the dynamics and dose/volume predictors of hematologic toxicity during CSI. Pediatric patients (≤ 18years) undergoing CSI in a tertiary cancer center were included. Medical records were retrospectively reviewed for clinical data and blood parameters were collected at baseline and weekly, until four weeks after the end of RT. The BM substructures were contoured, and dose-volume parameters were extracted. We used Wilcoxon rank-sum test to compare quantitative data, Chi square test for qualitative data and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves for dose/volume thresholds. Fifty-one patients were included. Severe toxicities (grade 3-4) were recorded as follows: 2% anemia, 8% thrombocytopenia, 25% leukopenia, 24% neutropenia. Ninety-eight percent of patients had lymphopenia (grade 1-4) at some point. Twenty-nine percent required granulocyte-colony stimulating factor, 50% had an infection and 8% required a blood transfusion. Dmean > 3.6 Gy and V15 Gy > 10.6% for Pelvic Bones were associated with a higher risk of developing any ≥ G3 toxicities. Dmean > 30-35 Gy to the thoracic and lumbar spine was predictive for G3-4 anemia and thrombocytopenia, and Cervical Spine Dmean > 30 Gy was associated with ≥ G3 neutropenia. CSI was well tolerated, without life-threatening complications in our cohort, but hematologic toxicity was frequent, with severity increasing with higher mean doses delivered to the hematogenous BM and larger volumes of BM receiving 30-35 Gy.

Outcomes of Proton Therapy to Infradiaphragmatic Sites in Pediatric Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients

Purpose: When treating pediatric patients with radiotherapy (RT), an important area of optimization is reducing integral dose with the goal of minimizing toxicity. As a result, proton radiation (PT) is a well-established RT modality for certain clinical indications within pediatrics. However, there is limited data on outcomes of PT in pediatric patients with Hodgkin lymphoma who receive RT to infradiaphragmatic targets. We report on radiation planning details, doses achieved to organs at risk (OARs), and outcomes for this population, and additionally provide comparative dosimetric data between photon and proton plans for a patient subset. Methods: This is a single-institution retrospective study of pediatric patients with Hodgkin lymphoma who received curative intent PT to infradiaphragmatic targets between 2011-2022. Demographic and clinical factors were collected from the electronic medical record, and toxicity was reported using CTCAE version 5.0. Dosimetric and clinical factors associated with toxicity and oncologic outcomes were assessed via Cox regression, while the paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed rank sum test was used for dosimetric analyses. Photon comparison plans were generated for a subset of 10 patients who received PT to a range of infradiaphragmatic subsites, and doses to key OARs were compared across modalities via the Wilcoxon signed rank sum test. Results: Twenty-one patients comprising 22 PT courses were included. Median follow-up was 4.8 years. Mean age at the time of RT was 14.2 years (range 4-22 years) and 48% were male. Median dose was 21 Gray equivalent (GyE) over 14 fractions. 50% of patients received PT to multiple subdiaphragmatic sites, and top locations treated in single-target PT courses included spleen (32%), retroperitoneum (14%), and pelvis (3%). Most common acute grade 1 (G1) toxicities were fatigue (59%) and anorexia (36%). Rates of acute G2 and G3+ toxicity were 18% and 0%, respectively. The average maximum dose (Dmax) to the spinal cord was 15.3 Gy and bowel bag (BB) was 19.9 Gy. Multiple BB metrics were significantly different between patients who developed nausea and those who did not: V5 Gy (median 42% vs. 2%, p=.0068), V15 Gy (median 30% vs. 1%, p=.0056), V20 Gy (median 26% vs. 0%, p=.0038), mean (median 949 vs. 35 cGy, p=.0063), and Dmax (median 2295 vs. 2184 cGy, p=.0301). Rectum Dmax also significantly varied between those who did or did not develop abdominal discomfort (median 119 vs. 0 cGy, p=.0071). No other OAR metrics were significantly different based on acute toxicity. Following PT, two patients developed persistent gastrointestinal issues of unclear etiology, and one patient developed chronic kidney disease (CKD). No statistically significant differences in doses to BB (V5 Gy, V15 Gy, V20 Gy, Dmax, or mean) or kidney (mean or V5 Gy) were detected between these patients and those without chronic abdominopelvic sequelae. Kidney V18 Gy and V20 Gy for the patient with subsequent CKD was 2% and 0%, respectively. No patients developed a second malignancy after PT, and 0% experienced progression of disease (POD) after final course of PT. In our 10 patient subset with photon comparison plans, protons achieved numerically lower averages for all OARs assessed with the exception of spinal cord Dmax (889 vs. 851 cGy), although these differences were not statistically significant (all p&amp;gt;0.05). Conclusions: PT is well-tolerated when utilized to target single or multiple infradiaphragmatic locations in pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma patients and leads to excellent oncologic and toxicity outcomes with long-term follow-up. PT may confer dosimetric advantages when compared to photons, although larger patient subsets are needed.