V1 Neurons In Cats Research Articles

Relationship Between Contrast Adaptation and Orientation Tuning in V1 and V2 of Cat Visual Cortex

Previous studies investigating the response properties of neurons in the primary visual cortex of cats and primates have shown that prolonged exposure to optimally oriented, high-contrast gratings leads to a reduction in responsiveness to subsequently presented test stimuli. We recorded from 119 neurons in cat V1 and V2 and found that in a high proportion of cells contrast adaptation also occurs for gratings oriented orthogonal to a neuron's preferred orientation, even though this stimulus did not elicit significant increases in spiking activity. Approximately 20% of neurons adapted equally to all orientations tested and a further 46% showed at least some adaptation to orthogonally oriented gratings, whereas 20% of neurons did not adapt to orthogonal gratings. The magnitude of contrast adaptation was positively correlated with adapting contrast, but was not related to the spiking activity of the cells. Highly direction selective neurons produced stronger adaptation to orthogonally oriented gratings than other neurons. Orientation-related adaptation was correlated with the rate of change of orientation tuning in consecutive cells along electrode penetrations that traveled parallel to the cortical layers. Nonoriented adaptation was most common in areas where orientation preference changed rapidly, whereas orientation-selective adaptation was most common in areas where orientation preference changed slowly. A minority of neurons did not show contrast adaptation (14%). No major differences were found between units in different cortical layers, V1 and V2, or between complex and simple cells. The relevance of these findings to the current understanding of adaptation within the context of orientation column architecture is discussed.

Contrast invariance of functional maps in cat primary visual cortex.

Neurons in cat primary visual cortex (V1) are clustered according to their preference for stimulus position, orientation, spatial frequency, and eye of presentation, thereby giving rise to functional maps. It is not known, however, whether a similar arrangement is present for stimulus contrast. Neurons in cat V1 vary considerably in their contrast responses, and might be clustered in a systematic fashion in this respect. Additionally, stimulus contrast might affect other functional maps. For example, there has been debate over whether the contrast threshold of neurons in cytochrome oxidase blobs is lower than elsewhere. Here we have imaged intrinsic signals to measure orientation maps in cat V1 at a range of contrast levels. We determined, on a pixel-by-pixel basis, contrast-response functions and orientation tuning curves. The fit parameters describing contrast responses were more or less uniform: We found no regions where neurons have lower contrast threshold than elsewhere. If such regions do exist, their functional maps must be substantially weaker than maps of orientation preference. Moreover, we found that contrast has no impact on maps of orientation preference: The orientation selectivity of each pixel is invariant with stimulus contrast. The contrast invariance that we demonstrate at the level of maps is well known at the level of single neurons. It suggests that neurons contributing to a pixel response generally have similar orientation preferences or similar contrast responses. The latter explanation is likely to hold in pinwheel centers, where preferred orientation of nearby neurons can differ markedly. In summary, our data suggest that contrast is represented uniformly over the surface of cat V1, and changes in contrast do not affect maps of orientation preference.

Different mechanisms underlie three inhibitory phenomena in cat area 17.

Recently, it has been proposed that all suppressive phenomena observed in the primary visual cortex (V1) are mediated by a single mechanism, involving inhibition by pools of neurons, which, between them, represent a wide range of stimulus specificities. The strength of such inhibition would depend on the stimulus that produces it (particularly its contrast) rather than on the firing rate of the inhibited cell. We tested this hypothesis by measuring contrast-response functions (CRFs) of neurons in cat V1 for stimulation of the classical receptive field of the dominant eye with an optimal grating alone, and in the presence of inhibition caused by (1) a superimposed orthogonal grating (cross-orientation inhibition); (2) a surrounding iso-oriented grating (surround inhibition); and (3) an orthogonal grating in the other eye (interocular suppression). We fitted hyperbolic ratio functions and found that the effect of cross-orientation inhibition was best described as a rightward shift of the CRF ('contrast-gain control'), while surround inhibition and interocular suppression were primarily characterised as downward shifts of the CRF ('response-gain control'). However, the latter also showed a component of contrast-gain control. The two modes of suppression were differently distributed between the layers of cortex. Response-gain control prevailed in layer 4, whereas cells in layers 2/3, 5 and 6 mainly showed contrast-gain control. As in human observers, surround gratings caused suppression when the central grating was of high contrast, but in over a third of the cells tested, enhanced responses for low-contrast central stimuli, hence actually decreasing threshold contrast.

Pattern adaptation and cross-orientation interactions in the primary visual cortex

The responsiveness of neurons in the primary visual cortex (V1) is substantially reduced after a few seconds of visual stimulation with an effective pattern. This phenomenon, called pattern adaptation, is uniquely cortical and is the likely substrate of a variety of perceptual after-effects. While adaptation to a given pattern reduces the responses of V1 neurons to all subsequently viewed test patterns, this reduction shows some specificity, being strongest when the adapting and test patterns are identical. This specificity may indicate that adaptation affects the interaction between groups of neurons that are jointly activated by the adapting stimulus. We investigated this possibility by studying the effects of adaptation to visual patterns containing one or both of two orientations—the preferred orientation for a cell, and the orientation orthogonal to it. Because neurons in the primary visual cortex are sharply tuned for orientation, stimulation with orthogonal orientations excites two largely distinct populations of neurons. With intracellular recordings of the membrane potential of cat V1 neurons, we found that adaptation to the orthogonal orientation alone does not evoke the hyperpolarization that is typical of adaptation to the preferred orientation. With extracellular recordings of the firing rate of macaque V1 neurons, we found that the responses were not reduced by adaptation to the orthogonal orientation alone nearly as much as by adaptation to the preferred orientation. In the macaque we also studied the effects of adaptation to plaids containing both the preferred and the orthogonal orientations. We found that adaptation to these stimuli could modify the interactions between orientations. It increased the amount of cross-orientation suppression displayed by some cells, even turning some cells that showed cross-orientation facilitation when adapted to a blank stimulus into cells that show cross-orientation suppression. This result suggests that pattern adaptation can affect the interaction between the groups of neurons tuned to the orthogonal orientations, either by increasing their mutual inhibition or by decreasing their mutual excitation.