Analytical methods must be validated so that the performance characteristics meet the requirements for the intended analytical application. Many excellent papers on validation of analytical methods have been published [l-7], and typical analytical parameters used in assay validation have been specified [l, 2, 4, 7-101: these include precision, accuracy, limit of detection, limit of quantitation, selectivity, linearity and ruggedness. In particular, development of a stability-indicating assay to monitor unchanged drug is of paramount importance in the course of stability studies on pharmaceutical dosage forms [ll-141. The selectivity (specificity) of an analytical method determines its ability to measure accurately and precisely the analyte in the presence of components of the sample matrix such as inactive ingredients, impurities and degradation products [15, 161. In the development of a stability-indicating assay, selectivity is the most critical criterion of the method’s validity. Liquid chromatography (LC) is usually the analytical technique most suitable for a stability-indicating assay of pharmaceuticals. Although LC has powerful resolving capacity, it is still quite often a challenge for the analytical chemist to develop a truly specific assay method. It is usually not difficult to check for interferences from the placebo ingredients or impurities. A placebo mixture can be easily prepared and analysed. Information on inherent impurities is often available from the drug manufacturer, as are authentic samples of relevant chemicals. The most difficult problem that the analyst faces is validation of the method’s selectivity against potential degradation products. Even for commonly used drugs, potential degradation products are not always known, and reference chemicals are frequently not available. In many cases, this problem can be overcome by producing degradation products, in situ, under different stress conditions, and analysing them without isolation or identification. Often degradation products are chromatographically very similar to the parent compound and they may elute at the same time. Therefore, it is critical to evaluate peak identity and homogeneity: whether the eluting peak observed on a chromatogram represents one component or a coeluting mixture of two or more components. Therefore, a technique that permits judgement with some certainty of the purity of an eluting chromatographic peak is of particular benefit to the analytical chemist. There are several methods of determining the purity of a peak, including techniques such as comparing the retention time of the eluting peak with the retention time of a known