JOHN PIZER Cosmopolitanism and Weltliteratur With the demise of Soviet Communism and the concomitant intensification of cultural and economic globaUzation Ui the 1990s, the issue of cosmopoUtanism has become a central topic Ui rnteUectual debates. There are many definitions of this concept, but common to aU of them is a focus on the transcendence of national and regional perspectives. The cosmopoUtan views the entire globe as her homeland, attempts to gain a purchase on ethical , artistic, poUtical, and economic domains from an international rather than from a more locaUzed vantage point. The cosmopoUtan paradigm has existed at least since the advent of the Stoics, who viewed aU humanity as chUdren of Zeus and urged their foUowers to regard themselves as citizens of the world. While the Stoic ideal has found adherents throughout subsequent history, transnational forces have become so predominant that world citizenship has started to become a pervasive, often unwelcome feeling rather than a Utopian construct. The circumstance that globaUsm is perceived by many as a reality rather than as a dream (or threat) is thus responsible for the contemporary renewal and enhancement of debate on the venerable cosmopoUtan ideal. The vehemence of the discussions is evident Ui the attacks from both the right and the left poUtical spectrums provoked by Martha Nussbaum's now weU-known essay "Patriotism and CosmopoUtanism," which first appeared Ui the Boston Review Ui 1994. Drawing on the Stoics, Nussbaum argued that a truly cosmopoUtan education would lead not only to greater international cooperation, interest in and respect for the citizens of the world who reside outside America's borders, but to deeper Internal knowledge as Americans begin to see themselves through the perspective of foreign Others.1 From the right, Gertrude Himmetfarb responded that cosmopoUtanism was an "Ulusion" since much of the world ignores "Western" values such as civil rights for minorities and tolerance of divergent reUgious and political viewpoints. Cosmopolitanism, Ui .Himmetfarb's opinion, also negates feelings of famiUal, communal, and national cohesion.2 From the left, Immanuel WaUerstein argued that cosmopoUtanism as an ethical paradigm does nothing to obviate global inequalities or to strengthen democratic institutions, since proclamations of world citizenship simply tend to obscure the chaUenges facing the world's oppressed peoples and may actually nurture the socioeconomic status quo.3 The most compelling treatments of cosmopolitanism are more nuanced than those delineated above, tending neither toward Nussbaum's Goethe Yearbook XIII (2005) 166 John Pizer almost unqualified embrace nor its outright rejection from leftist and rightist political positions. Less polemic engagements attempt to sustain a cosmopolitanism that chaUenges and recognizes the viability of local and even national polities while arguing for the importance, indeed necessity, of international socioeconomic, cultural, and political frameworks.4 Ever since Goethe first enunciated the term Weltliteratur Ui 1827,5 but especiaUy after the publication of the Gespräche mit Goethe m 1836,6 this paradigm has been both attacked and defended for its cosmopolitan strains. The original 1827 pronouncement Ui Über Kunst und Altertum was ostensibly prompted by a positive review in the Paris Globe of a recently published French adaptation of Torquato Tasso. Having noted that his references to the French reports are not primarily motivated by personal considerations, Goethe goes on to announce the advent of a new world literary age: Überall hört und liest man von dem Vorschreiten des Menschengeschlechts, von den weiteren Aussichten der Welt- und Menschenverhältnisse. Wie es auch im ganzen hiemit beschaffen sein mag, welches zu untersuchen und näher zu bestimmen nicht meines Amtes ist, wUl ich doch von meiner Seite meine Freunde aufmerksam machen, daß ich überzeugt sei, es bUde sich eine allgemeine Weltliteratur, worin uns Deutschen eme ehrenvolle RoUe vorbehalten ist. He goes on to assert that Germany is drawing the attention, approbation and censure, the comprehension and miscomprehension of all nations (GA 14:908). Already evident Ui this first enunciation of Weltliteratur is a balance between a perception of universal trends and a focus on the central role Germany plays in them. Unlike the Stoics and most other early cosmopoUtans , Goethe does not abnegate the national domain as an element m cultural and civic discourse. Indeed, Ui his notes on Weltliteratur, Goethe...