Utilization Of Angiotensin-converting Enzyme Inhibitors Research Articles

Predictors of acute kidney injury after percutaneous nephrolithotomy in adult patients: prospective observational study.

To assess the frequency and the predictive factors of Acute Kidney injury (AKI) in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL). A prospective observational work. Demographic, preoperative laboratory data, stone characteristics, and intraoperative and postoperative data were gathered. Perioperative AKI had been defined as an elevation in serum creatinine by ≥ 0.3 mg/dl within 48h, or ≥ 1.5 times baseline, or urine volume less than 0.5ml/ kg/hour for 6hours. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the predictive factors of AKI. ROC curves were utilized to determine the cutoff values of the risk variables. P-values were deemed statistically significant when they were less than 0.05. A total of 418 participants had been involved. The frequency of AKI was 13.9, and 17.2% of patients with AKI developed CKD. The risk factors were age > 46.5 years, smoking, BMI > 28.5 kg/m2, hypertension, diabetes, utilization of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI), haemoglobin < 10.8 gm/dl, baseline creatinine > 1.41 mg/dl, eGFR < 65.2 ml/min./1.73 m2, serum uric acid > 5.2 mg/dl, stone volume > 1748 mm3, large tract size, long operative time, and intra-operative bleeding. Patients with AKI had a notably extended duration of hospitalization (3.2 days ± 0.45 vs 2.1 ± 0.42, p < 0.001). Perioperative AKI occurred in 13.9% of individuals undergoing PNL. Identification and optimization of the risk factors and meticulous technique during PNL procedures should be attempted to decrease the risk of AKI.

Trends in pharmacotherapy utilization among patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Study objectiveHalf of patients with heart failure have preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Over the years, guidelines have recommended or advised against various therapies for HFpEF management. However, there is limited evidence on the trends in utilization of the various medications. The aim of this study was to examine the trends in the use of pharmacotherapies among patients with HFpEF from 2008 through 2020. DesignRetrospective cohort study of patients with HFpEF used MarketScan® Commercial and Medicare Supplemental Databases (2007–2020). ParticipantsPatients with HFpEF. Outcome measuresUtilization rates for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs), aldosterone receptor antagonists (ARAs), diuretics, β-blockers, calcium channel blockers (CCBs), phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors (PDE5Is), nitrates, digoxin, and sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) within 90 days of the first HFpEF diagnosis. ResultsWe identified 156,730 patients with HFpEF (mean [SD] age, 73 [13.4] years; 57 % females). From 2008 to 2020, we found increased utilization rates for ARNIs (0.02 % vs. 0.17 % of all patients, p < 0.01), ARBs (14.3 % vs. 18.6 %, p < 0.01), ARAs (7.0 % vs. 8.4 %, p < 0.01), CCBs (30.6 % vs. 33.4 %, p < 0.01), and SGLT2i (0.001 % vs. 0.021 %, p < 0.01). By contrast, the utilization of ACEIs (30.4 % vs. 20.5 %, p < 0.01), digoxin (9.5 % vs. 2.4 %, p < 0.01), nitrates (10.7 % vs. 4.9 %, p < 0.01), diuretics (54.1 % vs. 50.4 %, p = 0.20), and β-blockers (52.6 % vs. 51.7 %, p < 0.01) decreased, while utilization rates of PDE5Is remained stable (1.5 % vs. 1.1 %, p = 0.90) . ConclusionsDuring the 13-year study period, the utilization of ARNIs, ARBs, ARAs, CCBs, and SGLT2i increased while the utilization of digoxin, nitrates, diuretics, and β-blockers decreased among patients with HFpEF.

A STUDY ON UTILIZATION OF ANGIOTENSIN-CONVERTING ENZYME INHIBITORS AND ANGIOTENSIN RECEPTOR BLOCKERS IN PATIENTS WITH CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES

Objectives: The objective of this study was to assess the prescribing pattern, most common indication, and adverse effects associated with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) in patients with cardiovascular diseases, and to identify the risk factors associated with cardiovascular diseases in a tertiary care hospital.Methods: A prospective observational study was carried out for a period of 6 months from October 2016 to March 2017 in both inpatients and outpatients of the cardiology department. Patients received either ACEIs or ARBs were enrolled in the study. The relevant details of the patients were collected from the patient case note and treatment chart and data analyzed.Results: Of 100 patients, 23.0% were female and 77.0% were male. Among them, majority of patients were in the age group of 41–60 years. Diabetes mellitus (39%), smoking (20%), and alcohol (14%) were the common risk factors. The most common indications of ACEIs were found to be ischemic heart diseases (IHDs) (17%) followed by hypertension (HTN)/IHD (12%), and IHD/heart failure (12%). Main indications of ARBs were found in HTN/ IHD (16%). Utilization of ACEIs (70%) was found to be higher when compared with ARBs (30%). Ramipril (69%) and telmisartan (18%) were the most commonly used ACEIs and ARBs, respectively. While analyzing the adverse effects of ACEIs and ARBs, about 5.71% of patients were identified with ramipril induced dry cough.Conclusions: The complications of cardiovascular diseases can be reduced by knowing the incidence of risk factors and alternative therapy can be initiated by assessing the incidence of adverse drug reactions related to ACEIs and ARBs

Improving heart failure patient outcomes utilizing guideline-directed therapy.

Heart failure (HF) prevalence continues to rise and remains a significant burden to patients, caregivers, providers, and the healthcare system. Guideline-directed medical therapy with standard neurohormonal blockade has been the cornerstone of medical management for many years. Despite aggressive utilization of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, beta-blockers, and aldosterone antagonists, HF hospitalizations and readmissions are common and residual mortality remains high. With the development of two novel medical therapies (sacubitril/valsartan and ivabradine), the American College of Cardiology, American Heart Association, and Heart Failure Society of America released a pharmacologic update to provide guidelines for incorporation of these agents into clinical practice. Although effective via different mechanisms of action, both agents now have a prominent role in risk reduction. HF medical regimens often become quite complex, especially when associated with comorbid conditions, and require frequent follow-up. Providers must be proficient in patient monitoring, medication dose titration, and therapy optimization. Individualized patient care strategies such as guideline-directed therapy can promote long-term adherence and quality of life.

Anti-hypertensive medicines prescribing for medical outpatients in a premier teaching hospital in Nigeria: a probable shift of paradigm.

Previous studies of anti-hypertensive medicines utilization pattern in Nigeria showed that Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) were often the least prescribed. However, the appropriate use of ACEIs in the black population achieves good blood pressure control and provides additional long term cardio- and renovascular protection benefits. To assess the current utilization pattern of antihypertensive medicines with specific emphasis on identifying possible shift in the frequency of use of ACEIs. A prospective cross-sectional assessment of the current utilization pattern of anti-hypertensive medicines was conducted among 300 randomly selected cohort at a 900-bed premier Teaching Hospital located in Ibadan, Southwestern Nigeria. The current utilization pattern was compared with the results of a study conducted at the same site and published 10 years ago. Of the 300 random cohorts, a majority (79%) were females (237) with mean age 58.7 years (SD=2.81 years. Stage 2 hypertension was the most frequent diagnosis (54.3%). The utilization of ACEIs and long acting CCB (amlodipine) significantly increased from 8.6% and 21% (Ten years ago) to 29.93% and 36.68% respectively (p < 0.0001). The use of thiazide diuretic and methyldopa declined significantly from 39.4% and 23.3% (Ten years ago) to 16.12% and 9.7% respectively (p < 0.0001). Adverse drug reactions due to ACEIs were documented in 1.5% (3), while laboratory monitoring of serum potassium, urea and creatinine was conducted in only 37% (111) of cohort. Potentially harmful drug-drug interactions were identified in 25% (75) of cohorts, and the most frequent were ACEIs + NSAIDs (53.3%), ACEIs + amiloride / hydrochlorothiazide (22.6%). Anti-hypertensive medicines utilization has significantly shifted towards the increased use of ACEIs and long acting dihydropyridine CCBs. The use of thiazides and methyldopa has declined significantly. Physicians appeared more cognizant of the long term cardio- and renovascular benefits inherent in using ACEIs in a high cardiovascular risk group such as black hypertensive.

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors: first-line agents in cardiovascular protection?

This editorial refers to ‘Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors reduce mortality in hypertension: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials of renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system inhibitors involving 158 998 patients’, by L.C. van Vark et al. , doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehs075 The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) is essential for the regulation of blood pressure, cardiovascular and renal function. Drugs inhibiting the RAAS, particularly angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), represent the cornerstone of blood pressure control and considered key components of the modern comprehensive management of cardiovascular disease.1 In essential hypertension, utilization of ACE inhibitors and ARBs is based on their effectiveness of lowering blood presssure, high tolerability, and the possibility to prevent or reverse target organ damage. Importantly, controlled clinical trials have demonstrated that these drugs can reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.1 ACE inhibitors and ARBs, however, differ in their mechanisms of action and also their effectiveness in reducing clinical, particularly cardiovascular outcomes, and can therefore not be viewed as interchangeable. The study by van Vark et al. 2 demonstrates the following important findings: (i) in hypertensive patients, RAAS blockade is associated with a significant reduction of all-cause mortality; (ii) but this benefit is limited to ACE inhibitors and not shared by ARBs. The present results are not surprising, as they confirm and extend previous reports indicating that ACE, but not ARBs, reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. In a recent meta-analysis of 11 trials (55 050 patients) by Strauss and Hall that compared ARBs with either placebo or active treatments, only stroke was less likely in patients treated with ARBs than in those receiving a comparator.3 Their benefit in reducing stroke notwithstanding, ARBs did not reduce total mortality, but increased the risk of myocardial infarction (MI) by 8% …

Influence of demand-side measures to enhance renin–angiotensin prescribing efficiency in Europe: implications for the future

European countries strive to enhance prescribing efficiency. This includes renin–angiotensin drugs following the availability of generic angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs). Aims: To compare angiotensin receptor blocker utilization and expenditure patterns in Austria and Croatia following prescribing restrictions, as well as with other European countries introducing different supply- and demand-side measures. Lastly, to appraise the impact of generic losartan in Croatia on utilization of patented angiotensin receptor blockers. Method: Observational retrospective study principally between 2001 and 2007, using defined daily doses and €/1000 inhabitants/year. Demand-side measures were based on the four ‘E’s – education, engineering, economics and enforcement. Results: Greater intensity of follow-up of prescribing restrictions in Croatia enhanced utilization of ACEIs versus Austria. There was high utilization of ACEIs in Scotland following intensive demand-side measures, similar to Austria and Croatia. Demand-side measures in Spain (Catalonia) and Sweden also appeared to moderate angiotensin receptor blockers utilization. The combination of measures helped stabilize expenditure on renin–angiotensin drugs when adjusted for population sizes despite appreciable increases in volumes. The only exception was Portugal, with less intensive measures. Conclusion: Multiple and intensive demand-side measures enhanced prescribing efficiency. The more intense follow-up of ARB prescribing restrictions in Croatia had a greater influence on subsequent utilization patterns than Austria. Both findings confirm earlier studies. Reforms also favorably enhanced the prescribing of generic losartan once available.

Pharmacoepidemiology of antihypertensive drugs in primary care setting of Bahrain between 1998 and 2000

To compare pattern of antihypertensive drug utilization in 1998 with 2000 following the: (a) publication of 1999 World Health Organization/International Society of Hypertension (WHO/ISH) guidelines for drug management of hypertension; and (b) introducing new antihypertensives to the essential drug list, in primary care, Bahrain. Retrospective prescription-based survey carried out in seven out of 20 primary care health centers in Bahrain. A total of 9272 patients comprising 6543 with uncomplicated hypertension and 2729 with diabetic hypertension were studied. Between 1998 and 2000, the prescription rate of beta-blockers and methyldopa significantly declined (p < 0.0001) while the rate of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and calcium channel blockers (CCBs) increased (p < 0.0001) in uncomplicated hypertension. However, in diabetic hypertension there was a non-significant decline in utilization of beta-blockers, CCBs, methyldopa, and diuretics whereas a significant increase in prescribing of ACE inhibitors (p < 0.0001). Inclusion of Perindopril into the essential drug list resulted in an overall increase in utilization of ACE inhibitors: use of captopril and enalapril declined while lisinopril and perindopril increased. Substitution of immediate-release (IR) indapamide by sustained-release (SR) formulation did not change the overall utilization of diuretics; however, intra-class changes were evident with a significant decline in use of thiazide diuretics and concomitant increase in use of SR indapamide by 2000. The antihypertensive prescribing pattern is influenced by WHO/ISH guidelines as well as by introduction of new antihypertensives to primary care essential drug list in primary care. The choice of a drug is also influenced by presence of co-morbidity with diabetes mellitus.

Outpatient utilization of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) among heart failure (HF) patients after hospital discharge

Outpatient utilization of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) among heart failure (HF) patients after hospital discharge

Outpatient utilization of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors among heart failure patients after hospital discharge

ObjectivesThis study was designed to assess outpatient angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) use after heart failure (HF) hospitalization. BackgroundAssuring therapy with ACEIs at discharge after HF hospitalization is a key Medicare quality measure. The benefits of such quality improvement attempts will be limited if therapy is not continued long-term. MethodsTo assess the factors associated with filling an ACEI prescription in the 30 days postdischarge and the proportion of patients who filled such prescriptions subsequently up to 365 days postdischarge, we studied 219 patients with depressed ejection fraction (EF) specifically and 960 HF patients in general. ResultsSixty-seven percent of patients with depressed EF and 55% of the total cohort were discharged with ACEIs. Overall 81.2%/77.1% (depressed EF/total cohort) of survivors discharged with ACEIs had filled a prescription by 30 days postdischarge; only 66.3%/63.3% were current users at 365 days. In contrast, for patients with no discharge order for ACEIs, only 12.7%/12.0% (depressed EF/total cohort) had filled such a prescription by 30 days and 12.5%/18.8% were current users at 365 days postdischarge. Patients with a discharge order for ACEIs were more likely to fill a prescription within 30 days postdischarge (hazard ratio 10.93, 95% confidence interval 5.28, 22.61, for patients with depressed EF). ConclusionsFor patients with HF who are discharged while taking ACEIs, there is a significant decline in use after discharge. Patients not discharged with ACEIs are unlikely to be started as outpatients. Quality improvement efforts therefore need to be focused on both discharge planning and outpatient care.

Effect of heart failure program on cardiovascular drug utilization and dosage in patients with chronic heart failure.

Utilization and dosage of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) remain low. Recent data suggest that care of patients with CHF in specialized heart failure programs is associated with improved clinical outcomes. Specialized heart failure care is associated with better utilization and higher dose of cardiovascular drugs. Data from 133 patients with CHF referred to a heart failure program were analyzed. Mean functional class 3.1 +/- 0.5, left ventricular ejection fraction 19 +/- 8. Utilization and doses of cardiovascular drugs were examined at initial evaluation and at last visit, after an average period of 17 +/- 14 months. Hospitalization and survival data were determined. Utilization of ACE inhibitors and angiotensin-receptor blockers increased from 87 to 100% (p < 0.001). Average daily dose increased by 60%, from the equivalent of captopril 105 +/- 78 mg to 167 +/- 86 mg (p < 0.001). Utilization of the following drugs increased significantly: beta blockers (16-37%, p < 0.001), metolazone (10-23%, p = 0.007), spironolactone (1-36%, p < 0.001), amiodarone (7-15%, p = 0.05), hydralazine (1-9%, p = 0.004), and nitrates (20-33%, p = 0.03). One-year survival was 90%. The 3- and 6-month hospitalization rates for heart failure were 4 and 7%, and for all cardiovascular causes they were 6 and 11%, respectively. Care of patients with CHF in a specialized heart failure program was associated with significant increase in the utilization and doses of all beneficial cardiovascular drugs, especially ACE inhibitors. It was also associated with excellent clinical outcomes.

The use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors in patients with acute myocardial infarction in community hospitals. Michigan State University Inter-Institutional Collaborative Heart (MICH) Study Group.

Previous studies documenting underutilization of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) have been limited to Medicare populations. This study examines ACEI prescription rates and predictors in a community sample of hospitalized patients with AMI. The charts of 1163 community patients with AMI, prospectively identified at admission between January 1, 1994, and April 30, 1995, were reviewed. Only 64 of 158 (40%) patients considered ideal candidates for ACEI prescription were discharged with a prescription for an ACEI. In a multivariate logistic regression model, prior ACEI utilization [adjusted odds ration (OR) = 3.26; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.05-5.20], presence of congestive heart failure (OR = 2.33; CI = 1.50-3.61) and black race (OR = 2.20; CI = 1.34-3.64) were identified as positive predictors of ACEI prescription. Conversely, lack of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) measurement (OR = 0.46; CI = 0.28-0.75), LVEF > 40 ( OR = 0.27; CI = 0.18-0.40), and acute renal failure (OR = 0.08; CI = 0.01-0.44) were negative predictors. Women were also less likely to be discharged with an ACEI prescription (OR = 0.71; CI = 0.48-1.05). Furthermore, women were significantly less likely to have LVEF measured prior to discharge than were males (77 vs. 85%, p = 0.001). This study underscores the need for improvement in the utilization of ACEI in eligible patients with AMI. It also identifies opportunities for improvement in prescription rates, especially in women.

Effect of heart failure program on cardiovascular drug utilization in patients with chronic heart failure

Summary Background: Utilization and dosage of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) remain low. Recent data suggest that care of patients with CHF in specialized heart failure programs is associated with improved clinical outcomes. Hypothesis: Specialized heart failure care is associated with better utilization and higher dose of cardiovascular drugs. Methods: Data from 133 patients with CHF referred to a heart failure program were analyzed. Mean functional class 3.1 +- 0.5, left ventricular ejection fraction 19 +- 8. Utilization A related editorial entitled “Specialized Heart Failure Centers-A Success or an Indicator of the Failure of Our Health Care Delivery System” by Pittand Nicklas appears on page 881. and doses of cardiovascular drugs were examined at initial evaluation and at last visit, after an average period of 17 * 14 months. Hospitalization and survival data were determined. Results: Utilization of ACE inhibitors and angiotensinreceptor blockers increased from 87 to 100% (p < 0.001). Average daily dose increased by 60%, from the equivalent of captopril 105 A 78 mg to 167 A 86 mg (p< 0.001). Utilization of the following drugs increased significantly: beta blockers (16-37%,p<0.001),metolazone( 10-23%,p=0.007), spironolactone (1-36%,p<0.001), amiodarone (7-15%,p=0.05), hydralazine (1-9%, p = 0.004), and nitrates (20-33%, p = 0.03). One-year survival was 90%. The 3- and 6-month hospitalization rates for heart failure were 4 and 7%, and for all cardiovascular causes they were 6 and 1 1 %, respectively.