Uterine Tachysystole Research Articles

High-Dose versus Low-Dose Oxytocin for Labor Augmentation: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Background/Objectives: Although oxytocin administration is recommended for delayed labor progress, there is no consensus over the preferred optimal dose of oxytocin. We aimed to perform a meta-analysis of pregnancy outcomes comparing high-dose versus low-dose oxytocin regimens for augmentation of delayed labor. Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were systematically searched for studies comparing high-dose with low-dose oxytocin for labor augmentation from inception up to May 2023. The outcomes assessed were cesarean rate, instrumental delivery rate, postpartum hemorrhage, neonatal death, and uterine tachysystole. Subgroup analysis was performed with randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and propensity-matched studies. Statistical analysis was performed using Rstudio. Heterogeneity was assessed with I2 statistics, and a random-risk effect was used if I2 > 50%. Results: Twenty-one studies met inclusion criteria, and eighteen were RCTs. A total of 14.834 patients were included, of whom 7.921 (53.3%) received high-dose and 6.913 (46.6%) received low-dose oxytocin during labor augmentation. No statistical differences were found in cesarean delivery, neonatal mortality, postpartum hemorrhage and vaginal instrumentation rate. However, uterine tachysystole incidence was significantly higher with high-dose oxytocin (95% Cl, 1.30-1.94, p = 0.3; 0.6; I2 = 9%). Conclusions: Labor augmentation with a low-dose oxytocin regimen is effective as with a high-dose regimen, but with significantly less uterine tachysystole events, which can lead to intrauterine and neonatal complications. Our findings suggest that a low-dose regimen may be safe and effective for labor augmentation in medical practice.

Impact of dinoprostone versus cook cervical ripening balloon on induction in pregnancies complicated by small-for-gestational-age fetuses at term

Objective To explore the complications and pregnancy outcomes of vaginal dinoprostone vs. Cook’s double balloon for the induction of labor among pregnancies complicated by small-for-gestational-age (SGA) at term. Methods This retrospective study included consecutive singleton pregnancies complicated by SGA treated at Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital between January 2017 and December 2021. The patients were divided into the Cook’s double balloon and dinoprostone groups according to the induction method they received. The primary outcome was vaginal delivery. Results This study included 318 women [165 (aged 30.25 ± 4.72 years) and 153 (aged 28.80 ± 3.91 years) in the dinoprostone and Cook’s balloon groups]. The dinoprostone group had a higher vaginal delivery rate than the Cook’s balloon group (83.6% vs. 71.9%, p = .012). The cervical ripening duration (9.73 ± 4.82 vs. 17.50 ± 8.77 h, p < .001) and induction to delivery duration (22.11 ± 8.13 vs. 30.27 ± 12.28, p < .001) were significantly shorter in the dinoprostone group compared with the Cook’s balloon group. Less women needed oxytocin infusion in the dinoprostone group compared with that in the Cook’s balloon group (32.7% vs. 86.3%, p < .001). Dinoprostone was independently associated with vaginal delivery (HR = 1.756, 95%CI: 1.286–2.399, p = .000). The rates of uterine tachysystole and spontaneous rupture of the fetal membrane were significantly higher in the dinoprostone group than that in the Cook’s balloon group (10.3% vs. 0.7%, p < .001; 7.3% vs. 1.3%, p = .012). There were no differences in maternal complications and neonatal outcomes between the two groups. Conclusion In pregnant woman with pregnancies complicated by SGA, cervical ripening using dinoprostone were more likely to achieve vaginal delivery than those with Cook’s balloon, and with a favorable complication profile.

Misoprostol with balloon vs oxytocin with balloon in high-risk pregnancy induction: a randomized controlled trial

Pregnancies at high risk for maternal, fetal, or placental complications often necessitate induction of labor in the late preterm or early term period for delivery. Limited data exist on the safest method of induction to use in this specific patient population. This study aimed to compare the combination of oxytocin plus a Cook balloon vs misoprostol plus a Cook balloon for induction of labor in high-risk pregnancies. We conducted an open-label, randomized controlled trial at a single institution from July 2020 to May 2022. The study was approved by the institutional review board and registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04492072). Individuals with a high-risk pregnancy, at least ≥22 weeks' gestation, with a singleton in cephalic presentation, Bishop score ≤6, and intact membranes were offered enrollment. A high-risk pregnancy was defined as a pregnancy with any of the following complications: hypertensive disease of pregnancy, fetal growth restriction, oligohydramnios, suspected placental abruption requiring delivery, uncontrolled pregestational diabetes, or abnormal biophysical profile or nonstress test requiring delivery. The primary outcome was the rate of cesarean delivery. Secondary maternal outcomes included induction to delivery interval, number of vaginal deliveries within 24 hours, rates of uterine tachysystole, intraamniotic infection, operative vaginal delivery, and postpartum hemorrhage. Secondary fetal outcomes included fetal heart rate abnormalities, stillbirth, Apgar scores <7 at 5 minutes, admission to the neonatal intensive care unit, arterial umbilical blood pH <7.1, sepsis, and neonatal death. A subgroup analysis was planned for the primary outcome to assess the different indications for cesarean delivery. An intent-to-treat analysis was performed. During the 22 months of the trial, a total of 150 patients were randomized, and 73 (49%) of those were induced with oxytocin and a Cook balloon and 77 (51%) were induced with misoprostol and a Cook balloon. There was no significant difference in the overall rate of cesarean delivery between the study groups, (21.9% vs 31.1%; relative risk, 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.41-1.21), nor among those for which the cesarean delivery was performed for a specific indication. There were no differences in the secondary maternal and fetal or neonatal adverse outcomes. In high-risk pregnancies, the rate of cesarean delivery and adverse maternal and fetal outcomes were similar for induction of labor with oxytocin and a Cook balloon and for induction with misoprostol and a Cook balloon.

Comparison of Intracervical Foley's Catheter With Vaginal Misoprostol Versus Intravaginal Misoprostol Alone for Cervical Ripening and Induction of Labor.

Introduction Induction of labor implies stimulation of contractions before the spontaneous onset of labor, with or without membranes. Augmentation refers to the enhancement of spontaneous contractions that are considered inadequate because of failed cervical and fetal descent. This study compared the effectiveness of intracervical Foley catheter insertion and vaginal misoprostol versus only vaginal misoprostol in the induction of labor and other outcomes relted to it. Methods The present study was a randomized controlled trial that included 148 women divided into two groups: (i) Group A, which received intracervical Foley catheter insertion and vaginal misoprostol (25 µg), and (ii) Group B, which received intravaginal administration of tablet misoprostol (25 µg) alone. We compared the median time from the time of induction to vaginal delivery, incidence of cesarean delivery, chorioamnionitis, puerperal infection, uterine tachysystole, neonatal information at delivery, and discharge status (i.e., birth weight, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, and neonatal death) between groups. Results We found that the rates of puerperal infection (n=36; 48.6%) and meconium-stained amniotic fluid (n=45; 60.8%) were higher in Group B than in Group A (n=20; 27.0% and n=25; 33.8%, respectively), which were statistically significant differences (p=0.0066 and p=0.0009, respectively). In addition, NICU admission was higher in Group B (n=47; 63.5%) than in Group A (n=30; 40.5%), which was a statistically significant difference (p=0.0051). Conclusion An intracervical Foley catheter with 25 µg of misoprostol was more effective for induction of labor than 25 µg of intravaginal misoprostol alone every six hours for a maximum of four doses in terms of induction to delivery interval, meconium-stained amniotic fluid, mode of delivery, intrapartum complications, and puerperal infection.

Pre-induction cervical ripening and hygroscopic cervical dilators in pre-labor induction

Introduction Induction of labor (IOL) is becoming a universal topic in Obstetrics, when the risk of continuing a pregnancy outweighs the benefits. Preinduction is a more recent tool to prepare the cervix when the BISHOP-score is low. About one-third of IOL cases require cervical ripening, which is the physical softening, thinning, and dilation of the cervix in preparation for labor and birth. We report a single center experience regarding the use of hygroscopic dilators in the pre-labor phase to obtain cervical ripening before labor induction. Materials & Methods We conducted a retrospective observational study comparing patient records from the Gynecology and Obstetrics Unit in “Santo Stefano” Hospital in Prato, Tuscany. The inclusion criteria for participants were women who had undergone pre-labor induction because of a BISHOP-score < 3. The gestational age of all the pregnant women was at term (> 37 weeks). Results From January 2022 to April 2022, a total of 581 women delivered at term of gestational age at the Gynecology and Obstetrics Unit in “Santo Stefano” Hospital. Cervical ripening was necessary for 82 women with a Bishop score < 3 and hygroscopic cervical dilators were used in 35/82 (42.7%) patients. All patients showed a change in Bishop-score upon removal of the dilators. All 35 patients (100%) reported an increase in terms of consistency and dilation of the cervix but not in terms of length. None of the patients reported discomfort during the 24 h that they kept the hygroscopic dilators in place. No patients reported uterine tachysystole on cardiotocographic tracing, vaginal bleeding, rupture of membranes or cervical tears. Conclusions Our results are in line with those in the literature, demonstrating the validity of hygroscopic dilators in cervical maturation of pregnancies at term and their efficacy was again highlighted in terms of both maternal and fetal safety and patient satisfaction.

Comparison of Obstetric Outcomes Between Controlled-Release Dinoprostone Vaginal Delivery System (PROPESS) and Administration of Oral Dinoprostone for Labor Induction in Multiparous Women at Term.

The aim of this study was to compare the rate of vaginal delivery and adverse outcomes of a controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal delivery system (PROPESS) and the administration of oral dinoprostone for labor induction in multiparous women at term. This retrospective case-controlled study included 92 multiparous pregnant women (46 and 46 in the PROPESS and oral dinoprostone groups, respectively) who required labor induction at ≥37 weeks of gestation. The primary outcome was the success rate of vaginal delivery following the insertion of PROPESS only or the administration of oral dinoprostone (up to six tablets) only. The secondary outcomes were uterine tachysystole with non-reassuring fetal status, the proportion of cases requiring pre-delivery oxytocin, and the rate of cesarean delivery. The proportion of pregnant women who delivered vaginally as the primary outcome was significantly higher in the PROPESS group (33/46 [72%]) than in the oral dinoprostone group (16/46 [35%], p < 0.01). In the secondary outcomes, the proportion of cases requiring pre-delivery oxytocin in the PROPESS group was significantly lower than that in the oral dinoprostone group (24% vs. 57%, p < 0.01). In multiparous women at term, PROPESS may be able to induce labor and lead to a higher vaginal delivery rate without adverse outcomes compared to oral dinoprostone.

A Comparison of Two Dosing Regimens of Misoprostol in Labour Induction: A Randomised Controlled Trial

Objective: To compare the effectiveness and safety of 50μg of sublingual misoprostol administered six (6) hourly to that of 50μg of vaginal misoprostol administered four (4) hourly. Methodology: A non-blinded, randomized controlled trial conducted from Sept 1, 2014, to Nov 31, 2014, at a tertiary hospital in Ghana. Hundred and sixty women with medical or obstetric indications for labour induction were randomized into two groups. Results: The rate of vaginal delivery, caesarean section, uterine tachysystole and uterine hyperstimulation were similar in both groups. Sixty-three (78.8%) and 66 (82.5%) mothers in the vaginal and sublingual groups delivered vaginally. More (10.0%) mothers in the vagina group required emergency caesarean for foetal distress. Six (vaginal group) and 8 (sublingual group) of the mothers required emergency caesarean for cephalopelvic disproportion. Three mothers from each group had an emergency caesarean section due to failed labour induction. Almost the same number of mothers had uterine tachysystole in both groups. More (3.8%) mothers in the vaginal group had uterine hyperstimulation. Differences in the mean induction delivery interval and the need for oxytocin augmentation were not significant. No differences were found in the intrapartum passage of meconium, blood loss in the third stage of labour, 5-minute Apgar score &lt;7, and neonatal intensive care unit admissions. Conclusion: The sublingual regimen was as effective and safe as the vaginal regimen in achieving vaginal delivery.

GBS colonization and risk of infection with foley catheter inductions

Rising rates of induction following the ARRIVE trial with increasing time spent on labor and delivery has led to consideration of outpatient induction regimens. Foley catheter inductions have lower rates of uterine tachysystole, but concern exists for risk of chorioamnionitis due to ascending infection, particularly in the setting of GBS colonization. We aimed to determine the association of GBS colonization and the risk of chorioamnionitis in those women undergoing induction with Foley catheter dilation.

The utilization of transperineal ultrasound following fetal heart deceleration after epidural analgesia: a case report

BackgroundWe report a case of fetal heart rate decelerations and relaxation of pelvic muscles and fetal descent using transperineal ultrasound after initiation of epidural labor analgesia.Case presentationA 32-year-old woman, G1P0 with gestational age of 40 weeks, required epidural analgesia when her cervical dilatation was 2 cm. Baseline transperineal ultrasound examination was performed before epidural puncture. The fetal heart rate tracing was normal before the initiation of analgesia. Approximately 10 min after the epidural administration of the loading dose, the patient reported onset of analgesia and the FHR tracing showed variable-decelerations. There was no hypotension or evidence of uterine tachysystole. Transperineal ultrasound was performed again after epidural analgesia took effect. The anteroposterior diameter of the levator hiatus increased from 5.3 to 6.6 cm and angle of progress increased from 116°to 133°. The relaxation of pelvic muscle and rapid descent of fetal head may have contributed to the FHR deceleration. The midwife elevated the fetal head through the vagina with her hand, and the FHR recovered soon thereafter.ConclusionsChanges in fetal heart rate after initiation of neuraxial analgesia are unpredictable. In addition to FHR and tocodynametric monitoring, performing TPU may helpful in distinguishing the reasons for FHR change and initiating corresponding corrective measures.

Outcome of Inducing Labor in Pregnancies with Suspected Fetal Growth Restriction: Oxytocin Discontinuation during the Active Phase of Labor versus Conventional Management.

Although fetal growth restriction (FGR) is associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery during induced labor, there is limited evidence to guide labor management. This study aimed to investigate the prognosis of induced labor in pregnancies with suspected FGR and whether oxytocin discontinuation during the active phase of labor affects maternal and neonatal outcomes. This retrospective cohort study investigated singleton pregnancies with vertex presentation and indications for labor induction owing to FGR after 34.0 weeks of gestation at Osaka University Hospital. From January 2010 to December 2013, women were conventionally managed, and oxytocin was continued until delivery unless there was an indication for discontinuation (conventional management group). From January 2013 to December 2020, oxytocin was routinely discontinued, or the dose was reduced at the beginning of the active phase of labor (oxytocin discontinuation group). A total of 161 women (conventional management group, n = 74; oxytocin discontinuation group, n = 87) were included. After the active phase of induced labor, the total incidence of cesarean delivery was very low (3.1%), and the duration was short (173 ± 145 minutes). Oxytocin discontinuation was associated with lower cesarean delivery (1.1 vs. 5.4%; p = 0.12) and uterine tachysystole (9.8 vs. 23.0%; p = 0.08) rates and longer duration of the second stage of labor (mean: 56.5 ± 90 vs. 34.2 ± 45 minutes; p = 0.08) than conventional management; however, the difference was not significant. The other maternal and neonatal outcomes, including postpartum hemorrhage, did not also significantly differ between them. After the active phase of induced labor for suspected FGR, the risk of cesarean delivery is low, and the high incidence of uterine tachysystole and rapid labor progression should be considered cautiously. Oxytocin can be safely discontinued during the active phase of labor in women undergoing labor induction for FGR without an increased risk of cesarean delivery or other unfavorable outcomes. · The cesarean delivery rate was low after the active phase.. · The labor progress after the active phase was rapid.. · Oxytocin can be safely discontinued during the active phase..

Induction of Labor at Term with Oral Misoprostol or as a Vaginal Insert and Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert - A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study.

Introduction The efficacy, safety, and perinatal outcome of oral misoprostol (OM), a misoprostol vaginal insert (MVI), and a dinoprostone vaginal insert (DVI) for induction of labor at term was examined in a prospective multicenter cohort study (ethics committee vote 4154–07/14). The primary aims of the study were the induction-birth interval (IBI), the cumulative delivery rates after 12 h, 24 h, and 48 h as well as the mode of delivery. Method 322 pregnant women were included in four German tertiary perinatal centers (MVI 110, DVI 64, OM 148). They did not vary in age or BMI. Statistical analysis was carried out using a multivariate linear regression analysis and binary logistic regression analysis. Results With regards to the median IBI, MVI and OM were equally effective and superior to the DVI (MVI 823 min [202, 5587]; DVI 1226 min [209, 4909]; OM 847 min [105, 5201]; p = 0.006). Within 24 hours, 64% were able to deliver with DVI, 85.5% with MVI and 87.5% with OM (p < 0.01). The rates of secondary Caesarean sections (MVI 24.5%; DVI 26.6%; OM 18.9%) did not differ significantly. Uterine tachysystole was found in 20% with MVI, 4.7% with DVI and 1.4% with OM (p < 0.001). A uterine rupture did not occur in any of the cases. Perinatal acidosis occurred (umbilical cord arterial pH < 7.10) in 8.3% with MVI, 4.7 with DVI and 1% with OM (p = 0.32). Neonatal condition was only impaired in three cases (5-minute Apgar score < 5). Summary Induction of labor at term using the prostaglandins misoprostol and dinoprostone is an effective intervention that is safe for the mother and child. Oral application of misoprostol demonstrated the highest efficacy while maintaining a favorable safety profile.

Effect of a Perinatal Clinical Decision Support System on the Incidence and Management of Uterine Tachysystole

A multihospital community health care system installed and implemented a new perinatal clinical decision support software program in October 2020. This system included artificial intelligence to assess uterine contractions and to display an alert if uterine tachysystole (UT; more than five contractions in a 10-minute period averaged over 30 minutes) was detected. Only one study was identified in the literature that demonstrated that the rate of UT decreased after implementation of this perinatal system.

Continued versus discontinued oxytocin after the active phase of labor: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

To systematically assess the effect of discontinued vs continued oxytocin after active stage of labour is established. Pubmed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched to 18 April 2021. The risk ratio or mean difference with corresponding 95% confidence interval were computed to investigate the effect of intervention or control on maternal and fetus outcomes. This review was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews: CRD42021249635. Discontinuing oxytocin when the active labour was established might decrease the risk of cesarean delivery [RR (95% CI): 0.84 (0.72-0.98), P = 0.02]. However, when we restricted our analysis to women who performed cesarean section after the active phase was reached, the difference was no longer significant [RR (95% CI): 0.82 (0.60-1.10), P = 0.19]. The incidence of uterine tachysystole [RR (95% CI): 0.36 (0.27-0.49)], postpartum hemorrhage [RR (95% CI): 0.78 (0.65-0.93)], and non-reassuring fetal heart rate [RR (95% CI): 0.66 (0.58-0.76)] were significantly lower in the oxytocin discontinuation group. We also found a possible decrease in the risk of chorioamnionitis in discontinued oxytocin group [RR (95% CI): 2.77 (1.02-5.08)]. An increased duration of active [MD (95% CI): 2.28 (2.86-41.71)] and second [MD (95% CI): 5.36 (3.18-7.54)] phase of labour was observed in discontinued oxytocin group, while the total delivery time was not significantly different [MD (95% CI): 20.17 (-24.92-65.26)]. After the active labor is reached, discontinuation of oxytocin could be considered a new recommendation for the improved maternal and fetal outcomes without delaying labour.

Spontaneous Rupture of an Unscarred Uterus in the Second Stage of Labour: A Case Report and Review of Literature

Background: Uterine rupture is a rare, but severe pregnancy complication. It is mostly associated with history of uterine surgery, especially previous cesarean section but can rarely occur in unscarred uterus. Diagnosing this condition in the absence of uterine scar requires a high degree of suspicion and fetal heart tracing abnormalities remain the most common symptom. Case Report: 21-year-old G2P1 was admitted in latent labour. Pitocin was used for augmentation. Fetal heart tracing was in category 1 except an episode of bradycardia accompanied by uterine tachysystole that was resolved by resuscitative measures and turning off Pitocin. Later in the labour course, the FHT showed recurrent late and variable decelerations, cervix was found to be fully dilated at the time. Pushing was started and following a prolong deceleration, cesarean section was performed that showed a uterine rupture in the posterior wall of uterus. Conclusion: Although rare, uterine rupture should be considered as a diagnosis even in the absence of uterine scar as the main risk factor.

The association between uterine contraction frequency and fetal scalp pH in women with suspicious or pathological fetal heart rate tracings: A retrospective study

ObjectiveCurrent guidelines provide little supporting literature for the definition of uterine tachysystole during labour and no distinction is made for optimal contraction frequency depending on the clinical situation. We hypothesize that fetal hypoxia is frequently caused by uterine tachysystole and that high uterine contraction frequencies are especially harmful when fetal heart rate (FHR) abnormalities are present. We studied the association between contraction frequency and fetal scalp pH values in women with an indication for fetal blood sampling (FBS) based on FHR abnormalities. Study designA retrospective study including 762 women was performed in a tertiary teaching hospital in the Netherlands from January 2015 until January 2020. Women with a singleton pregnancy with a gestational age ≥ 34+0 weeks were included when FBS was performed because of suspicious or pathological FHR tracings. Exclusion criteria were maternal age < 18 years, failed fetal scalp pH values, lack of thirty minute registration by tocodynamometry prior to FBS, poor quality of uterine monitoring, intrauterine resuscitation in the thirty minutes prior to FBS, maternal body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m2 and neonatal birth weight < 10th percentile.Uterine contractions in the thirty minutes prior to FBS were manually annotated by a researcher who was blinded to FBS values, FHR and other obstetrical data. Linear and logistic analysis were used to explore the association between uterine contraction frequency and FBS results. ResultsLow fetal scalp pH values were significantly associated with contraction frequency prior to FBS. Fetuses of women with four to five contractions per ten minutes prior to FBS were 2.4 times more likely to have hypoxia as compared to fetuses of women with two to three contractions per ten minutes (aOR 2.4, 95% CI 1.1–5.4). With increasing contraction frequency, the risk of fetal hypoxia further increased. ConclusionsContraction frequency above four per ten minutes prior to FBS is significantly associated with fetal hypoxia in women with FHR abnormalities. We suggest to aim for a maximum contraction frequency of four per ten minutes in these women.

Evaluation of Low-dose and High-dose Intravaginal Misoprostol for Induction of Labour: A Randomised, Double-blinded, Single Centre Study

Introduction: Misoprostol is a synthetic prostaglandin E1 analogue widely used for cervical ripening and labour induction. However, misoprostol optimal dose required to induce labour is still controversial. Aim: To determine the efficacy and safety of 25 µg and 50 µg of intravaginal misoprostol for induction of labour at term and to evaluate maternal and neonatal complications. Materials and Methods: The present study was a prospective, randomised, double blind, single centre study carried out during March 2019 to December 2020. All the selected participants were randomised (1:1) to group 1 which received 25 µg of intravaginal misoprostol (n=70) and group 2 received 50 µg of intravaginal misoprostol (n=70). Based on the Bishop’s score, misoprostol was chosen as labour inducing agent. Number of misoprostol doses, mode of delivery, vaginal delivery duration, maternal and neonatal complications was recorded. Statistical significance among study groups were analyzed by using Chi-square test. Results: Postdatism was most frequently reported indication in both the study groups (57.1% and 52.9%). A total of 14 and 4 participants in group 2 and group 1 received only single dose of misoprostol (p&lt;0.01). Participants who received misoprostol 50 µg (n=60, 85.7%) has slightly showed higher vaginal deliveries compared to misoprostol 25 µg (n=57, 81.4%). The mean duration of induction time in group 2 was 10.12 hours and group 1 women showed 13.56 hours (p&lt;0.0001). Maternal and neonatal complications were slightly higher in 50 µg misoprostol group. Maternal complications such as uterine tachysystole (n=4), Postpartum Haemorrhage (PPH) (n=3) and uterine hyperstimulation syndrome (n=2). Neonatal complications with 50 µg misoprostol were Apgar &lt;7 at 1 min (n=4), Apgar &lt;7 at 5 min (n=3), Special Care Baby Unit (SCBU) admissions (n=2) and severe birth asphyxia (n=1). Misoprostol with 25 µg has showed Apgar &lt;7 at 1 min (n=2), Apgar &lt;7 at 5 min (n=2), SCBU admissions (n=1). Conclusion: The efficacy and safety results of 25 µg intravaginal misoprostol were comparable with 50 µg of intravaginal misoprostol for labour induction. The advantages of 50 µg misoprostol were it favours the vaginal deliveries, lesser active induction time and decrease number of misoprostol doses required to induce labour. However, higher dose of misoprostol showed higher frequencies of both maternal and neonatal complications.

Labour Induction at Term; Oral versus Intravaginal Misoprostol

Objective: To compare oral misoprostol (100mg) to vaginal misoprostol (25 µg) for cervical ripening and labor induction. Study design: Interventional study Place &amp; duration of study: The study was carried out at Lady Willingdon Hospital, Lahore, during August 2006 to January 2007. Patients &amp; methods: Fifty nine women with medical or obstetric indications for labor induction with undilated uneffaced cervices were assigned randomly to receive 100µg of oral or 25µg of vaginal misoprostol every 4 hours for 24 hours. Intravenous oxytocin was then given using a standardized protocol. Results: Among 59 subjects. 29 received oral and 30 received vaginal misoprostol. The mean interval from start of induction to delivery was 1240 ± 845 minutes for orally treated women and 1381±802 minutes for vaginally treated women (P=.06). More orally treated women delivered vaginally in 24 hours than vaginally treated women 17 versus 16 (P=.14). Twenty five women (86.2%) who received oral misoprostol delivered vaginally, compared with 26 women (86.7%) who received vaginal misoprostol (P=.07). Oxytocin was given to 14 (49.6%) orally treated and 16(53.3%) vaginally treated subjects. More women in oral group had tachysystole, three compared with one (P.06) and – hyper stimulation. Frequencies of intrapartum complications and birth outcome were similar between groups. Conclusion: Oral misoprostol 100 µg and vaginal misoprostol 25µg were similarly effective for cervical ripening and labor induction. Oral administration was associated with trends toward higher likelihood of vaginal delivery and more uterine tachysystole.

Outpatient Cervical Ripening With Misoprostol in Low-Risk Pregnancies.

ObjectiveTo determine if outpatient cervical ripening with daily misoprostol can reduce admission to delivery time in women with low-risk pregnancies at 39 or more weeks of gestation.Study designThis is a retrospective cohort study of a convenience sample of low-risk pregnancies that underwent elective outpatient cervical ripening compared to matched controls for parity (nulliparous vs. parous) and gestational age. Time from admission to delivery, induction agents, presence of tachysystole, mode of delivery, length of hospitalization, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission, and low Apgar scores were compared.ResultsFifty-six patients who underwent outpatient cervical ripening with daily dosing of misoprostol were compared to 56 patients matched for parity and gestational weeks who underwent inpatient cervical ripening/induction of labor with misoprostol. We found the time from admission to delivery in the outpatient cervical ripening cohort was significantly lesser than the inpatient cohort (17.5 ± 11.5 hours outpatient vs. 26.6 ± 15.6 hours inpatient, P=0.001). More patients (N=18, 32%) were able to deliver within 12 hours of admission in the outpatient induction group compared to the inpatient group (N=8, 11%, P=0.010). There were no differences in frequency of cesarean delivery, uterine tachysystole with or without fetal heart rate changes, NICU admission, low Apgar scores, or low umbilical artery pH values between the two groups.ConclusionOutpatient cervical ripening with misoprostol may be a feasible alternative to inpatient cervical ripening in low-risk pregnancies, may help improve patient experience, and reduce the operational burden that elective induction confers upon labor and delivery units.

Maternal Hypotension and Tachysystole Following Neuraxial Anesthesia: Effect on Fetus in Labor.

Maternal Hypotension and Tachysystole Following Neuraxial Anesthesia: Effect on Fetus in Labor.

Vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical Foley catheter for cervical ripening in postdate primigravid women: a randomized clinical trial

BackgroundBeing one of the most common indications of labor induction, postdate pregnancy can lead to serious maternal and fetal complications. In this study we aimed to compare vaginal misoprostol with intracervical Foley catheter (FC) for cervical ripening in postdate primigravid women.MethodsThis randomized clinical trial included 120 primigravid women aged 18–35 years with singleton, postdate pregnancies, and Bishop score ≤ 4. Participants were randomized into two equal groups. The first group received 25 µg vaginal misoprostol and the second group had an 18 Fr FC inserted into their cervical canal. Labor induction was performed using oxytocin in both groups if progression of labor or true contractions did not occur within 6 h of the interventions. In case of nonreassuring fetal heart rate, fetal distress, placental abruption, or prolonged labor, C-section was performed.ResultsThe frequency of normal vaginal delivery, Cesarean section, meconium-stained amniotic fluid, and neonatal intensive care unit admission did not differ significantly between groups. Placental abruption and uterine tachysystole occurred more frequently in the misoprostol group (15.0 vs. 1.7%, P = 0.008 and 21.7 vs. 0.0%, P < 0.001, respectively). A significantly higher number of women in the FC group required oxytocin (73.3 vs. 41.7%, P < 0.001). Duration of labor was significantly higher in the FC group (P = 0.001).ConclusionsDue to the lower rate of placental abruption and uterine tachysystole observed with FC, it appears to be superior to vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening in postdate primigravid women; however, its longer labor duration and higher oxytocin requirement should be taken into consideration.Trial registrationIranian Registry of Clinical Trials, IRCT20181218042033N4. Registered 19/04/2020. Retrospectively registered, https://www.irct.ir/trial/47037