Purpose: To compare abdominal myomectomy (AM) with uterine artery embolization (UAE) for treatment of myomas with respect to objective and subjective outcomes. Methods: A retrospective chart review of patients who underwent AM (n = 36) and UAE (n = 73) over a 3-year period was done. Follow-up consisted of phone interviews with patients, who reported symptom changes on a six-point scale. Results were compared using the t test and the X 2 test, with P <0.05 as the statistical limit. Results: Although the UAE group was significantly older (45 versus 38), with a lower initial Hct (33 versus 36), the days hospitalized (0 versus 3), days requiring narcotics (2.5 versus 5.9), and days to normal activity (7.5 versus 35) were significantly lower. The AM group lost an average of 380 cc blood, while the UAE group had minimal blood loss. Both groups were similar in the preprocedure incidence of menorrhagia, pain, and pressure. On follow-up, the UAE group showed significant improvement in menorrhagia symptoms compared with the AM group, with no significant difference in improvement of other symptoms. Complications in the AM group (n = 7, 19.4%) included requirement for nonautologous blood transfusion (n = 2), wound infection, adhesions, readmission for ileus, chronic pelvic pain, and chronic incision pain. UAE patient complications (n = 3, 4.1%) included endometritis, readmission for pain, and transient leg numbness. Conclusion: UAE is a good alternative to AM, with fewer hospitalization days, less blood loss, quicker return to work, and fewer complications. Subjective symptom improvement resembled that of AM, with significantly better resolution of menorrhagia.