Use Of Transradial Access Research Articles

UTILITY OF PERCUTANEOUS TRANSAXILLARY ACCESS FOR PERIPHERAL VASCULAR PROCEDURES AND INTERVENTIONS

The use of transfemoral (TF) access for endovascular peripheral vascular procedures can be precluded in many occasions; such as hostile aortoiliac segments. The use of transradial access can be limited by the vessel size, distance from lesion and loss of support, and availability of tools with

Does VALIDATE-SWEDEHEART invalidate the use of bivalirudin in myocardial infarction?

Over the past two decades, technological advances in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) [such as 2 nd generation drug eluting stents (DES), use of transradial access] and antithrombotic therapy (more potent P2Y 12 agents) have made PCI safer and more effective in treating patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The use of direct and indirect thrombin inhibitors along with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPI) during PCI have contributed to improved angiographic and clinical outcomes, but at the cost of increased bleeding complications and its attendant risks of morbidity and death (1).

Manual heating of the radial artery (Balbay maneuver) to facilitate radial puncture prior to transradial coronary catheterization

ObjectiveTransradial access is widely used for both diagnostic and interventional cardiac procedures. The use of transradial access offers several advantages, including decreased bleeding, fewer vascular complications, and reduced length of hospital stay and cost. However, the small size of the radial artery limits the size of the equipment that can be used via this approach. In this study we sought to investigate whether preprocedural manual heating of the radial artery facilitates radial artery puncture. MethodsPatients undergoing transradial cardiac catheterization were randomized to subcutaneous nitroglycerin plus diltiazem or manual heating. The study endpoint was puncture score (score 1: easiest – puncture at first attempt; score 2: second attempt; score 3: third attempt; score 4: fourth attempt or more; score 5: puncture failed). ResultsNinety consecutive patients were enrolled in the study, 45 allocated to the drug treatment group and 45 to the heating group. Patients underwent radial artery ultrasound before catheterization. Complications were rare: one hematoma (drug treatment group) and one radial artery occlusion (heating group). Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were similar. Baseline radial artery diameter was similar in both groups (2.41±0.46 mm and 2.29±0.48 mm in the heating and drug treatment groups, respectively). However, the median puncture score was lower in the heating group (1; interquartile range 1-2) compared to the drug treatment group (2; interquartile range 1-3; p=0.001). ConclusionsPreprocedural manual heating of the radial artery facilitates radial artery puncture in patients undergoing transradial cardiac catheterization.

Manual heating of the radial artery (Balbay maneuver) to facilitate radial puncture prior to transradial coronary catheterization

ObjectiveTransradial access is widely used for both diagnostic and interventional cardiac procedures. The use of transradial access offers several advantages, including decreased bleeding, fewer vascular complications, and reduced length of hospital stay and cost. However, the small size of the radial artery limits the size of the equipment that can be used via this approach. In this study we sought to investigate whether preprocedural manual heating of the radial artery facilitates radial artery puncture. MethodsPatients undergoing transradial cardiac catheterization were randomized to subcutaneous nitroglycerin plus diltiazem or manual heating. The study endpoint was puncture score (score 1: easiest – puncture at first attempt; score 2: second attempt; score 3: third attempt; score 4: fourth attempt or more; score 5: puncture failed). ResultsNinety consecutive patients were enrolled in the study, 45 allocated to the drug treatment group and 45 to the heating group. Patients underwent radial artery ultrasound before catheterization. Complications were rare: one hematoma (drug treatment group) and one radial artery occlusion (heating group). Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were similar. Baseline radial artery diameter was similar in both groups (2.41±0.46 mm and 2.29±0.48 mm in the heating and drug treatment groups, respectively). However, the median puncture score was lower in the heating group (1; interquartile range 1-2) compared to the drug treatment group (2; interquartile range 1-3; p=0.001). ConclusionsPreprocedural manual heating of the radial artery facilitates radial artery puncture in patients undergoing transradial cardiac catheterization.

Bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin: a meta-analysis of patients receiving percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndromes

ObjectiveAcute coronary syndrome (ACS) encompasses ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), with generally high thrombus burden and non-ST segment elevation ACS (NSTE-ACS), with lower thrombus burden. In the setting of...

Efficacy of Radial Versus Femoral Access in the Acute Coronary Syndrome: Is it the Operator or the Operation That Matters?

In the recently published MATRIX (Minimizing Adverse Haemorrhagic Events by TRansradial Access Site and Systemic Implementation of angioX) trial, the use of transradial access (TRA) compared to transfemoral access (TFA) during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) was associated with a reduction in net adverse cardiovascular events. However, the results of MATRIX must be interpreted with caution due to several limitations including the strong modulating effect of operator/center experience on the relative efficacy of TRA and the inclusion of 2 distinct patient populations (ST-segment elevation and non-ST-segment elevation ACS). Therefore, although important, the results of MATRIX have strong limitations and are not sufficient to definitively identify an approach of choice during PCI for ACS. Further research is needed before strong, evidence-based recommendations regarding the approach of choice during PCI for ACS can be made.

Selective use of transradial access for endovascular treatment of severe intracranial vertebrobasilar artery stenosis

ObjectiveTo study the feasibility and safety of transradial artery access for endovascular intervention of severe intracranial vertebrobasilar stenosis for selected patients not suitable for transfemoral access. MethodsThis was a retrospective analysis of 58 patients who had undergone intervention for severe intracranial vertebrobasilar stenosis using transradial access between January 2012 and September 2014. The reasons for transradial access were traced. The outcome measures were the technical success rate, 30-day stroke or death in the territory of the culprit artery, periprocedural and access site complication rates. ResultsOut of the 58 patients, 19 patients (32.8%) used the transradial approach due to poor iliofemoral artery access, 28 (48.3%) due to unfavorable brachiocephalic or subclavian artery anatomy, 11 (19%) due to unfavorable vertebral artery anatomy. The technical success rate was 100%. There were four periprocedural complications, one of which was asymptomatic. The 30-day stroke rate was 5.2% (3/58 patients), with two of them having no residual neurological deficits. There was no mortality. None had access site complications. ConclusionsFor selected patients with severe intracranial vertebrobasilar stenosis with difficult femoral access or anatomical variations precluding provision of a stable support for intracranial intervention, the transradial approach was shown to be a safe and feasible alternative route of access. Future trials of endovascular treatment for intracranial posterior circulation strokes should take into account the route of access.

Underutilization of Radial Access in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Insights From the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the frequency and temporal trends in use of transradial access (TRA) for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The use of TRA has been associated with less bleeding and improved clinical outcomes in patients undergoing PCI for STEMI. The frequency of TRA compared with transfemoral access for patients undergoing PCI for STEMI or other indications (non-ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction, unstable angina, and non-acute coronary syndrome) in The Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium database between 2010 and 2013 was evaluated. Propensity matching was used to assess the relationship of TRA with in-hospital clinical end points of major bleeding, transfusion, and death. The TRA cohort of patients was stratified into deciles based on their predicted bleeding risk and compared with PCI indication. Of 122,728 PCI procedures, 17,912 (14.6%) were via TRA. Among patients with STEMI cases, 8.3% of the PCI cases were performed via TRA. The use of TRA increased over the study period although the growth was slower for STEMI than for other indications, P<0.001. The use of TRA for PCI in STEMI was associated with a lower rate of bleeding (11.7% versus 20.0%; P<0.001) and vascular complications (0.7% versus 2.6%; P=0.001), but no mortality difference (1.25% versus 2.33%; P=0.175). There was a strong negative association between the predicted risk of bleeding and the use of TRA (P<0.001). The use of radial access for PCI in STEMI is increasing but at a slower pace than for patients with other indications. TRA was associated with a reduction in bleeding and transfusion, but there is a strong negative correlation between the predicted risk of bleeding and actual use of TRA in STEMI.

The transradial approach during transcatheter structural heart disease interventions: a review.

To review the safety and feasibility of a transradial (TR) approach during transcatheter structural or congenital heart disease interventions when utilized as either as a primary or secondary arterial access site. Studies and case reports published between 2002 and 2014 utilizing the TR access during transcatheter structural and congenital heart disease interventions during alcohol septal ablation (ASA), ventricular septal defect (VSD), renal denervation (RD), paravalvular leak (PVL) closure, transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI, secondary access) and endovascular repair of aortic coarctation (ERAC, secondary access) were evaluated. Access-site (femoral vs. TR) vascular and bleeding complications were assessed. Femoral access complications ranged from 0.16% to 40%, with an overall incidence of 2.2% (56/2521). There were 18 reports or studies specifically evaluating the utility of TR access in the context of transcatheter structural heart disease interventions (ASA: 3; VSD: 1; RD: 3; PVL closure: 1; TAVI: 7, ERAC: 3). The use of TR access either as primary or secondary access site was feasible and allowed the completion of the procedure in all cases. The overall incidence of access-site complications following a TR approach was 0.5% (2/406 patients), with no major vascular or bleeding complications. A TR approach during transcatheter structural heart disease interventions appears to be a safe, effective means of delivering high procedural success accompanied by lower bleeding complications compared with the transfemoral approach.

Tailored use of transradial access for above-the-knee angioplasty.

To report the results and complications of a single-center experience of above-the-knee angioplasty via transradial access (TRA). In a prospective study, 110 consecutive patients (88 men; mean age 72 years, range 37-90) referred for critical limb ischemia (26, 24%) or claudication were eligible for lower limb angioplasty via TRA (patients with TASC D lesions of the superficial femoral artery and below-the-knee lesions were excluded). The majority of patients (84, 76%) were treated via a left TRA. A total of 170 lesions were addressed, of which 38 (22%) were occlusions; 113 stents were positioned in 82 patients. The overall technical success rate was 91%, with a 63% success rate in occlusions and a 98% success rate in stenoses; by location, the success rates were 91% in suprainguinal lesions and 90% in infrainguinal lesions. No hemorrhagic or local complications requiring surgery were observed. At 1-month follow-up, 101 patients had a downward shift of at least one category in the Rutherford classification of symptoms (clinical success rate 92%); 18 (16%) patients had occlusion of their access radial artery, but none had symptoms or discomfort. The present study demonstrates that TRA is a safe and effective approach for lower extremity arterial revascularization, at least for interventionists with longstanding experience in TRA and in selected anatomical subsets.

El uso del acceso radial en la angioplastia primaria: resultados en 1.029 pacientes consecutivos y análisis en subgrupos desfavorables

Introduction and objectivesThe transradial approach is associated with a reduction in vascular access-related complications after primary percutaneous coronary interventions. The purpose of this study was to examine the feasibility of the routine use of transradial access in primary angioplasty and to evaluate how it affects subgroups with less favorable characteristics. MethodsWe analyzed 1029 consecutive patients with an ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome treated with primary angioplasty. ResultsTransradial access was the primary approach in 93.1% of the patients. The success rate of primary angioplasty was 95.9%, and 87.6% of the patients were event-free 30 days after the procedure. Crossover was required in 3.0% of the patients with primary transradial access, and this rate remained stable over the years. Predictors of the need for crossover were age older than 75 years (odds ratio=2.50, 95% confidence interval, 1.09–5.71; P=.03) and a history of ischemic heart disease (odds ratio=2.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.12–6.24; P=.02). Primary transfemoral access use was higher in women older than 75 years. Use of the transradial approach in this subgroup did not affect reperfusion time or the success of angioplasty, although there was a greater need for crossover (10.9% vs 2.6%; P=.006). Among patients in cardiogenic shock, the transradial approach was used in 51.5%; reperfusion times and angioplasty success rates were similar to those obtained with transfemoral access, but there was a greater need for crossover. ConclusionsTransradial access can be used safely and effectively in most primary angioplasty procedures. In older women and in patients in cardiogenic shock, there is a higher crossover requirement, with no detriment to reperfusion time.Full English text available from:www.revespcardiol.org/en

Use of the Radial Approach in Primary Angioplasty: Results in 1029 Consecutive Patients and Analyses in Unfavorable Subgroups

Introduction and objectivesThe transradial approach is associated with a reduction in vascular access-related complications after primary percutaneous coronary interventions. The purpose of this study was to examine the feasibility of the routine use of transradial access in primary angioplasty and to evaluate how it affects subgroups with less favorable characteristics. MethodsWe analyzed 1029 consecutive patients with an ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome treated with primary angioplasty. ResultsTransradial access was the primary approach in 93.1% of the patients. The success rate of primary angioplasty was 95.9%, and 87.6% of the patients were event-free 30 days after the procedure. Crossover was required in 3.0% of the patients with primary transradial access, and this rate remained stable over the years. Predictors of the need for crossover were age older than 75 years (odds ratio=2.50, 95% confidence interval, 1.09–5.71; P=.03) and a history of ischemic heart disease (odds ratio=2.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.12–6.24; P=.02). Primary transfemoral access use was higher in women older than 75 years. Use of the transradial approach in this subgroup did not affect reperfusion time or the success of angioplasty, although there was a greater need for crossover (10.9% vs 2.6%; P=.006). Among patients in cardiogenic shock, the transradial approach was used in 51.5%; reperfusion times and angioplasty success rates were similar to those obtained with transfemoral access, but there was a greater need for crossover. ConclusionsTransradial access can be used safely and effectively in most primary angioplasty procedures. In older women and in patients in cardiogenic shock, there is a higher crossover requirement, with no detriment to reperfusion time.

The effects of intra-arterial vasodilators on radial artery size and spasm: implications for contemporary use of trans-radial access for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention

Transradial access (TRA) offers advantages including decreased vascular complications, reduced length of hospital stay, and reduced cost. The size of the radial artery (RA) limits the equipment that can be used via TRA. Intra-arterial (IA) vasodilators prevent and treat RA spasm, yet are not uniformly used in TRA and their effect on the absolute size of the RA remains unknown. 121 patients undergoing TRA for cardiac catheterization were included. 78 patients underwent RA angiography prior to administration of IA vasodilators ('no vasodilator' group), 43 patients underwent radial angiography after administration of an IA verapamil and nitroglycerin cocktail ('vasodilator' group). Quantitative angiography was used to compare the RA diameters. Clinical characteristics were similar between the groups, except that patients in the 'no vasodilator' cohort were taller (1.67 ± 0.1 m vs. 1.73 ± 0.1 m, p=0.002), and heavier (84.9 ± 18.2 kg vs. 75 ± 17.1 kg, p=0.003). In the 'vasodilator' group the proximal RA diameter was larger (2.29 ± 0.47 mm vs. 2.09 ± 0.41 mm, p=0.02) as was the narrowest segment (1.83 ± 0.56 mm vs 1.39 ± 0.43, p<0.0001) compared to the 'no vasodilator' group. At the RA origin, 79.4% of those in the 'vasodilator' group were larger than a 6 Fr guide catheter, compared to 51.4% in the 'no vasodilator' group (p=0.004). At the narrowest segment a higher percentage of RAs in the 'vasodilator' group were larger than a 5 Fr guide catheter (65.1% vs 26.9%, p<0.001) and a 6 Fr catheter (34.9% vs 10.3%, p=0.001). IA vasodilators increase pre-procedural RA diameter in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization via TRA. This increase in diameter has important implications for procedural planning. Boyer et al. performed a blinded controlled clinical trial investigating the effects of intra-arterial vasodilators on radial artery size and spasm during cardiac catheterization. The study demonstrates that intra-arterial vasodilators significantly increased the radial artery size throughout the entire course of the vessel and significantly decreased the amount of radial artery spasm. The authors conclude that these findings support the use of intra-arterial vasodilators during cardiac catheterization and have important implications for emerging technologies such as larger bore sheathless radial procedures.

Influence of access site choice on incidence of neurologic complications after percutaneous coronary intervention

Neurologic complications (NCs) are a rare but potentially devastating complication that may follow percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In recent years, there has been an increase in use of transradial access, driven by a developing body of evidence that favors its use over femoral access. Concerns have been raised, however, that transradial access may increase the risk of NC compared with transfemoral access. We aimed to investigate the influence of access site selection on the occurrence of NCs through a period of transition during which transradial access became the dominant route for PCI procedures performed in the United Kingdom. We performed a retrospective analysis of the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society database between January 2006 and December 2010. The data were split into 2 cohorts based on access site. An NC was defined as a periprocedural ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, or transient ischemic attack occurring before hospital discharge. Binary logistic multivariate analysis was used to investigate the influence of access site utilization on NCs and adjust for measured confounding factors. Between 2006 and 2010, the use of radial access increased from 17.2% to 50.8% of all PCI procedures. A total of 124,616 radial procedures and 223,476 femoral procedures were studied with a NC rate of 0.11% in each cohort. In univariate (odds ratio 1.01, 95% CI 0.82-1.24, P = .93) and multivariate analysis (odds ratio 0.99, 95% CI 0.79-1.23, P = .91), there was no significant association between the use of radial access and the occurrence of NCs. These results suggest that radial access is not associated with an increased risk of clinically detected NCs, even during a period when there was a rapid evolution in the preferred access site for PCI in the United Kingdom. These are reassuring results, particularly for operators embarking on a change to radial access for PCI.

Impact of access site selection and operator expertise on radiation exposure; a controlled prospective study

Published data relating to arterial access site selection and radiation exposure during coronary procedures suggest radial access may lead to increased radiation exposure, but this is based on poorly controlled studies. We sought to measure radiation exposure to patients and operators during elective coronary angiography (CA) according to access site, with other procedure related variables controlled for. We also investigated the specific effect of operator expertise in relation to radiation exposure. 100 consecutive patients undergoing first time elective CA were recruited prospectively. An expert transradial (TR) and an expert transfemoral (TF) operator performed 25 cases each via their default route. A trainee cardiologist with intermediate experience in both access sites performed 25 cases via each route. Angiographic projections were standardised and optimised radiation protection was utilised for all procedures. The primary endpoints were operator and patient exposure, quantified by effective dose (ED) and dose area product (DAP) respectively. Secondary endpoints included fluoroscopy time (FT) and time to patient ambulation. The trainee operator recorded higher values for radiation exposure in radial and femoral cases when compared to the expert operators. There were no significant differences in radiation exposure during CA to operator or patient according to access site when standardised by operator experience. For the trainee, ED for TR and TF procedures was 8.8 ± 4.3 μSv and 8.5 ± 6.5 μSv (P = .86) and DAP was 25.4 ± 4.8 Gycm(2) vs 25.2 ± 8.3 Gycm(2) (P = .9). For the expert TR and TF operators, ED was 6.4 ± 4.7 μSv vs 6.1 ± 5.6 μSv (P = .85) and DAP was 21.7 ± 6.5 Gycm(2) vs 22.4 ± 8.0 Gycm(2), (P = .74). There was no significant difference in FT in relation to access site. Time to ambulation was significantly longer with TF access. The use of TR access has no adverse effect on radiation exposure or FT for diagnostic CA, but does allow for quicker ambulation compared to TF access. The magnitude of radiation exposure is related to operator expertise for both access sites. The results of previous studies reflect the effect of uncontrolled patient and operator variables and not access site selection.

047 Trends in access site choice and PCI outcomes: insights from the UK national PCI dataset

BackgroundThere has been a drive to change access site practice for PCI with the aim of reducing access site complications. This is increasingly important with the shift to more acute...

Left Radial versus Right Radial Approach for Coronary Artery Catheterization: A Prospective Comparison

Despite several advantages of the transradial over the transfemoral approach, the use of transradial access for coronary interventions in daily practice is still low. Major limitations are the technical and anatomical issues related with right radial artery access. The left radial approach may have an advantage from the point of view of the vascular anatomy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of routinely using the left radial compared to the right radial approach. This is a prospective single center study comparing left radial to right radial access for coronary artery catheterization. The overall in-hospital major adverse cardiac and cerebral events (MACCE), procedural success rate, bleeding, vascular and procedural complications, fluoroscopy time, number of catheters, and amount of contrast agent used were assessed. A total of 1,032 coronary angiograms were performed: 420 were performed using the right radial artery and 612 the left radial artery. No differences were observed in MACCE and success rate between the two groups. No cases of major or minor bleeding and vascular complications requiring surgical intervention were reported. Fluoroscopy time and the number of catheters used were significantly less in the left radial group (P = 0.001 and P = 0.007, respectively), while the volume of contrast was similar (P = 0.264). The left radial approach in our series was demonstrated to be safe and feasible in daily practice, and in this study was associated with a reduction in fluoroscopy time and number of catheters used.

Decreased complication rates using the transradial compared to the transfemoral approach in percutaneous coronary intervention in the era of routine stenting and glycoprotein platelet IIb/IIIa inhibitor use: A large single-center experience

Studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of the transradial approach for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were carried out mainly before the widespread use of stents and glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors. We sought to determine the association between the choice of the vascular access site and procedural complications after PCI performed with routine stenting and GP IIb/IIIa inhibition. The data source was a prospective registry of 13,499 consecutive cases of PCI at the University Health Network, Toronto, Canada, from April 2000 to September 2006. Logistic regression was used to calculate the probability of selection to the radial access group. Using propensity score methodology, 3,198 patients with femoral access were randomly matched to 3,198 patients with radial access based on clinical, angiographic, and procedural characteristics. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify the independent predictors of access site-related complications. Major adverse cardiac event was defined as death, myocardial infarction, abrupt vessel closure, or coronary artery bypass surgery. Use of the transradial approach was associated with fewer vascular access complications (1.5% vs 0.6%, P<.001) and a shorter length of hospital stay. Multivariable analysis revealed transradial access (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.2-0.7) to be an independent predictor of lower risk, whereas primary PCI (OR 4.36, 95% CI 1.4, 13), recent myocardial infarction (OR 2.0 95% CI 1.2, 3.4), age (per 10 years increase: OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.1-1.7) and female gender (0R 2.78 95% CI 1.7, 4.6) were independent predictors of a higher risk of access site complications. Use of transradial access for PCI is safe and is independently associated with a reduced rate of in-hospital access site complications and reduced length of hospital stay.

Comparison of the risk of vascular complications associated with femoral and radial access coronary catheterization procedures in obese versus nonobese patients

In this retrospective review of 5,234 cardiac catheterizations and percutaneous coronary interventions, the rate of vascular complications was highest in extremely thin and morbidly obese patients and lowest in moderately obese patients, consistent with the previously reported "obesity paradox." The use of transradial access and arterial access closure devices was associated with reduced vascular complications in the population of obese patients.